Home  »  Company  »  Gillette India  »  Quotes  »  Auditor Report
Enter the first few characters of Company and click 'Go'

Auditor Report of Gillette India Ltd.

Jun 30, 2023

GILLETTE INDIA LIMITEDReport on the Audit of the Ind-AS Financial StatementsOpinion

We have audited the accompanying Ind-AS financial statements of GILLETTE INDIA LIMITED (“the Company”), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at June 30, 2023, the Statement of Profit and Loss (including Other Comprehensive Income), the Statement of Cash Flows, the Statement of Changes in Equity for the year then ended and the Notes to the Ind-AS financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information (hereinafter referred to as ‘financial statements’).

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid financial statements give the information required by the Companies Act, 2013, (“the Act”) in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the Indian Accounting Standards prescribed under Section 133 of the Act read with the Companies (India Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015, as amended, (Ind-AS) and with other accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at June 30, 2023, the profit, total comprehensive income, changes in equity and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Basis for Opinion

We conducted our audit of the financial statements in accordance with the Standards on Auditing (SAs) specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Our responsibilities under those Standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements’ section of our report. We are independent of the Company in accordance with the Code of Ethics issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (‘ICAI’) together with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements under the provisions of the Act and the Rules thereunder, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the ICAI’s Code of Ethics. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

Key Audit Matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the financial statements of the current period. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters. We have determined the matters described below to be the key audit matters to be communicated in our report.

Sr.

Key Audit Matter

Auditor’s Response

1.

Revenue Recognition (note no. 2.3(a) and 20 to the financial statements)

Revenue is measured net of trade discounts, rebates and various types of Marketing and Distribution Activities such as incentives and promotions.

The estimation of the various types of discounts, incentives and rebate schemes to be recognised based on sales made during the year is material and considered to be judgmental owing to the varying terms of the agreements with customers which are based on annual contracts or shorter term arrangements. In addition, the value and timing of promotions for products varies from period to period, and the activity can span over a year end.

Our audit procedures included:

(a) Assessing the appropriateness of the revenue recognition accounting policies, including those relating to discounts, incentives and rebates by comparing with applicable accounting standards.

(b) Testing the design, implementation and operating effectiveness of the Company’s general IT controls and key IT/manual application controls over the Company’s systems which govern recording of revenue and rebates/schemes in the general ledger accounting system.

(c) We tested the design, implementation and operating effectiveness of controls over the calculation of discounts, incentives and rebates including review of the independent service auditor’s SOC 1 (Type 2) report with regards to the third party service organization’s system and the suitability of the design and operating effectiveness of IT / manual controls relating to processing of claims.

Sr. Key Audit Matter

Auditor’s Response

Accumulated experience is used to estimate

(d)

Performing substantive testing (including year-end

the provision for discounts and rebates

cut-off testing) by selecting samples of revenue

considering the terms of the underlying

transactions recorded during the year (and before

schemes and arrangements with customers.

and after the financial year end) by verifying the

There is also a risk that revenue may

underlying documents, which included sales invoices,

be overstated due to fraud including

contracts and shipping documents.

through manipulation of the discounts and

(e)

We compared the historical discounts, rebates/

incentives recognised resulting from the

schemes and allowances to current payment trends.

pressure local management may feel to

We also considered the historical accuracy of the

achieve performance targets.

Company’s estimates in previous years.

(f)

Performing substantive testing by checking samples of rebate / schemes transactions to supporting documentation.

(g)

We assessed manual journals posted to revenue to identify unusual items.

(h)

Considering the adequacy of the Company’s disclosures in respect of revenue.

2. Uncertain Tax Positions (note no. 27 and 36

(a)

We evaluated the design and tested the operating

to the financial statements)

effectiveness of controls over the assessment

The Company is subject to a range of tax risks. There is inherent judgement involved

of uncertain tax positions and completeness of disclosures.

in determining provisions for uncertain

(b)

We discussed the status and potential exposures

tax positions. The Company is subject to

in respect of significant tax litigations with the

periodic challenges by local tax authorities

Company’s tax team including their views on the

on a range of tax matters during the

likely outcome of each assessment / litigation and

normal course of business, including direct

magnitude of potential exposure.

taxes, transfer pricing and indirect taxes. Applicable tax laws and regulations are subject to differing interpretations and the resolution of a final tax position can take several years to complete. Where the amount of tax payable is uncertain, the Company establishes provisions based on Management’s judgement of the likelihood of settlement being required.

(c)

We focused on the judgements made by Management in assessing the likelihood of potentially material exposures and the estimates used to determine such provisions where required. In particular, we focused on the impact of changes in local tax regulations and ongoing inspections by local tax authorities, which could materially impact the amounts recorded in the financial statements.

(d)

We involved our in-house tax experts to evaluate

Given the number of judgements involved

and challenge the appropriateness of Management''s

in estimating the provisions relating to

assessment and judgements to estimate the

uncertain tax positions and the complexities

provisions held in respect of uncertain tax positions.

of dealing with tax rules, this was considered

To do this, we assessed the provisions recognized in

as a key audit matter.

the financial statements using the outcome of prior and ongoing tax assessments conducted on the Company, correspondences between the Company and relevant tax authorities, judgemental positions taken in tax returns and current year estimates, our own experience in these areas and assessing whether the approach applied by the Company is supported by the practice in the industry.

(e)

We have also assessed the adequacy of the Company''s disclosures in respect of tax and uncertain tax positions.

Information Other than the Ind-AS Financial Statements and Auditor’s Report Thereon

The Company’s Board of Directors is responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the Director’s Report and Report on Corporate Governance but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon.

Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information identified above and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If, based on the work we have performed on the other information that we obtained prior to the date of this auditor’s report, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.

Management’s Responsibilities for the Financial Statements

The Company’s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Act with respect to the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance, changes in equity and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the financial statements, Management is responsible for assessing the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless Management either intends to liquidate the Company or to cease

operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.

The Board of Directors is also responsible for overseeing the Company’s financial reporting process.

Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with SAs will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.

As part of an audit in accordance with SAs, we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. We also:

• Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.

• Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. Under Section 143(3)(i) the Act, we are also responsible for expressing our opinion on whether the company has adequate internal financial controls system in place and the operating effectiveness of such controls.

• Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by Management.

• Conclude on the appropriateness of Management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast

significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Company to cease to continue as a going concern.

• Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the financial statements, including the disclosures, and whether the financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.

Materiality is the magnitude of misstatements in the financial statements that, individually or in aggregate, makes it probable that the economic decisions of the users of the financial statements may be influenced. We consider quantitative materiality and qualitative factors in (i) planning the scope of our audit work and in evaluating the results of our work; and (ii) to evaluate the effect of any identified misstatements in the financial statements.

We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.

We also provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards.

From the matters communicated with those charged with governance, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditor’s report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2020, (“the Order”), issued by the Central

Government of India in terms of sub-section (11) of Section 143 the Act, we give in the “Annexure A” a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the said Order, to the extent applicable.

2. As required by Section143(3) of the Act, we report that:

a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit.

b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books. As stated in Note 44 of the financial statements, the Company has maintained periodic backups of relevant information extracted from its ERP on servers physically located in India. The Company is in process of implementing a system to perform daily backups to comply with the requirements of the Companies (Accounts) Fourth Amendment Rules, 2022.

c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss (including Other Comprehensive Income), the Cash Flow Statement and the Statement of Changes in Equity dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account.

d) In our opinion, the aforesaid financial statements comply with the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with relevant rules issued thereunder.

e) On the basis of the written representations received from the Directors of the Company as on June 30, 2023, and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the Directors of the Company are disqualified as on June 30, 2023, from being appointed as a Director in terms of Section 164(2) of the Act.

f) With respect to the adequacy of the internal financial controls with reference to financial statements of the Company and the operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to our separate Report in “Annexure B”.

g) According to information and explanations given to us and based on our examination of the records of the Company, the Company has paid / provided managerial remuneration in accordance with the requisite approvals

mandated by the provisions of Section 197 of the Act.

h) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor’s Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i) The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position in its financial statements -Refer Note 36 to the financial statements.

ii) The Company did not have any longterm contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses.

iii) There has been no delay in transferring amounts, required to be transferred to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.

iv) The Management has represented that:

a) to the best of its knowledge and belief, other than as disclosed in the financial statements, no funds have been advanced or loaned or invested (either from borrowed funds or share premium or any other sources or kind of funds) by the Company to or in any other person or entity, including foreign entity (“Intermediaries”), with the understanding, whether recorded in writing or otherwise, that the Intermediary shall, whether, directly or indirectly lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or on behalf of the Company (“Ultimate Beneficiaries”) or provide any guarantee, security or the like on behalf of the Ultimate Beneficiaries;

b) to the best of its knowledge and belief, other than as disclosed in the financial statements, no funds have been received by the Company from any person or entity, including foreign entity (“Funding Parties”), with the understanding, whether recorded in writing or otherwise, that the Company shall, whether, directly or indirectly, lend or

invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or on behalf of the Funding Party (“Ultimate Beneficiaries”) or provide any guarantee, security or the like on behalf of the Ultimate Beneficiaries;

Based on such audit procedures performed by us which are considered reasonable and appropriate in the circumstances, nothing has come to our notice that has caused us to believe that the representations under sub-clause (i) and (ii) of Rule 11(e), as provided above, contain any material misstatement.

v) As per information and explanation furnished by Management and based on the records of the Company, the dividend proposed in the previous year, as well as the interim dividend declared and paid by the Company during the year is in accordance with Section 123 of the Act, as applicable.

The Board of Directors of the Company have proposed a final dividend for the year ended June 30, 2023, which is subject to the approval of the members at the ensuing Annual General Meeting. The proposed dividend is in accordance with Section 123 of the Act.

vi) Proviso to Rule 3(1) of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014 for maintaining books of account using accounting software which has a feature of recording audit trail (edit log) facility is applicable to the Companies for financial periods commencing April 1, 2023, and accordingly, reporting under Rule 11(g) of Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, is not applicable for the financial year ended June 30, 2023.

For KALYANIWALLA & MISTRY LLP CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

Firm Regn. No.: 104607W / W100166

Daraius Z. Fraser PARTNER

M. No.: 42454 UDIN: 23042454BGXFTA8283

Mumbai: August 29, 2023.


Jun 30, 2022

Report on the Audit of the Ind AS Financial Statements

Opinion

We have audited the accompanying Ind AS Financial Statements of GILLETTE INDIA LIMITED (“the Company”), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at June 30, 2022, the Statement of Profit and Loss (including Other Comprehensive Income), the Statement of Changes in Equity, the Statement of Cash Flows for the year then ended and the Notes to the Ind-AS financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information (hereinafter referred to as ‘financial statements’).

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid Ind-AS financial statements give the information required by the Companies Act, 2013 (the Act) in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the Indian Accounting Standards prescribed under section 133 of the Act read with the Companies (Indian Accounting

Standards) Rules, 2015, as amended (Ind-AS), and with other accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at June 30, 2022, the profit, total comprehensive income, changes in equity and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Basis for Opinion

We conducted our audit of the Ind-AS financial statements in accordance with the Standards on Auditing (SAs) specified under section 143(10) of the Companies Act, 2013. Our responsibilities under those Standards are further described in the ‘Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements’ section of our report. We are independent of the Company in accordance with the Code of Ethics issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India together with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the Ind-AS financial statements under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and the Rules thereunder, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the Code of Ethics. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

Key Audit Matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the Ind-AS financial statements of the current period. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the Ind-AS financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters. We have determined the matters described below to be the key audit matters to be communicated in our report.

Sr.

Key Audit Matter

Auditor’s Response

1.

Revenue Recognition (note no. 2.3(a) and 20 to the financial statements)

Revenue is measured net of trade discounts, rebates and various types of Marketing and Distribution Activities such as incentives and promotions.

The estimation of the various types of discounts, incentives and rebate schemes to be recognised based on sales made during the year is material and considered to be judgmental owing to the varying terms of the agreements with customers which are based on annual contracts or shorter term arrangements. In addition, the value and timing of promotions for products varies from period to period, and the activity can span over a year end.

Our audit procedures included:

(a) Assessing the appropriateness of the revenue recognition accounting policies, including those relating to discounts, incentives and rebates by comparing with applicable accounting standards.

(b) Testing the design, implementation and operating effectiveness of the Company’s general IT controls and key IT/manual application controls over the Company’s systems which govern recording of revenue and rebates/schemes in the general ledger accounting system.

Sr. Key Audit Matter

Auditor’s Response

Accumulated experience is used to estimate the

(c)

We tested the design, implementation and

provision for discounts and rebates considering

operating effectiveness of controls over

the terms of the underlying schemes and

the calculation of discounts, incentives and

arrangements with customers.

rebates including review of the independent

There is also a risk that revenue may be overstated

service auditor’s SOC 1 (Type 2) report with

due to fraud including through manipulation of

regards to the third party service organization’s

the discounts and incentives recognised resulting

system and the suitability of the design

from the pressure local management may feel to

and operating effectiveness of IT / manual

achieve performance targets.

controls relating to processing of claims.

(d)

Performing substantive testing (including year-end cut-off testing) by selecting samples of revenue transactions recorded during the year (and before and after the financial year end) by verifying the underlying documents, which included sales invoices, contracts and shipping documents.

(e)

We compared the historical discounts, rebates/schemes and allowances to current payment trends. We also considered the historical accuracy of the Company’s estimates in previous years.

(f)

Performing substantive testing by checking samples of rebate / schemes transactions to supporting documentation.

(g)

We assessed manual journals posted to revenue to identify unusual items.

(h)

Considering the adequacy of the Company’s disclosures in respect of revenue.

2. Uncertain Tax Positions (note no. 27 and 36 to the

Our

audit procedures included:

financial statements)

(a)

We evaluated the design and tested the

The Company is subject to a range of tax

operating effectiveness of controls over the

risks. There is inherent judgement involved in

assessment of uncertain tax positions and

determining provisions for uncertain tax positions.

completeness of disclosures.

The Company is subject to periodic challenges

(b)

We discussed the status and potential

by local tax authorities on a range of tax matters

exposures in respect of significant tax

during the normal course of business, including

litigations with the Company’s tax team

direct taxes, transfer pricing and indirect taxes.

including their views on the likely outcome of

Applicable tax laws and regulations are subject

each assessment / litigation and magnitude

to differing interpretations and the resolution of a final tax position can take several years to

of potential exposure.

complete. Where the amount of tax payable is uncertain, the Company establishes provisions based on Management’s judgement of the likelihood of settlement being required.

(c)

We focused on the judgements made by Management in assessing the likelihood of potentially material exposures and the estimates used to determine such provisions where required. In particular, we focused on

Given the number of judgements involved in

the impact of changes in local tax regulations

estimating the provisions relating to uncertain tax

and ongoing inspections by local tax

positions and the complexities of dealing with tax

authorities, which could materially impact the

rules, this was considered as a key audit matter.

amounts recorded in the financial statements.

Sr.

Key Audit Matter

Auditor’s Response

(d) We involved our in-house tax experts to evaluate and challenge the appropriateness of Management''s assessment and judgements to estimate the provisions held in respect of uncertain tax positions. To do this, we assessed the provisions recognized in the financial statements using the outcome of prior and ongoing tax assessments conducted on the Company, correspondences between the Company and relevant tax authorities, judgemental positions taken in tax returns and current year estimates, our own experience in these areas and assessing whether the approach applied by the Company is supported by the practice in the industry.

(e) We have also assessed the adequacy of the Company''s disclosures in respect of tax and uncertain tax positions.

Information Other than the Ind-AS Financial Statements and Auditor’s Report Thereon

The Company’s Board of Directors is responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the Director’s Report and the Report on Corporate Governance but does not include the Ind-AS financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon which we obtained prior to the date of this auditor’s report.

Our opinion on the Ind-AS financial statements does not cover the other information and we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the Ind-AS financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the Ind-AS financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.

Management’s Responsibility for the Ind-AS Financial Statements

The Company’s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 (“the Act”) with respect to the preparation of these Ind-AS financial statements that give a

true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance, changes in equity and the cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards specified under section 133 of the Act. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding of the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the Ind-AS financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the Ind-AS financial statements, Management is responsible for assessing the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless Management either intends to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.

The Board of Directors is also responsible for overseeing the Company’s financial reporting process.

Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Ind-AS financial statements

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the Ind-AS financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with SAs will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these Ind-AS financial statements.

As part of an audit in accordance with SAs, we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional scepticism throughout the audit. We also:

• Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.

• Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. Under section 143(3)(i) of the Companies Act, 2013, we are also responsible for expressing our opinion on whether the company has adequate internal financial controls system in place and the operating effectiveness of such controls.

• Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by Management.

• Conclude on the appropriateness of Management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast

significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Company to cease to continue as a going concern.

• Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the financial statements, including the disclosures, and whether the financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.

Materiality is the magnitude of misstatements in the financial statements that, individually or in aggregate, makes it probable that the economic decisions of the users of the financial statements may be influenced. We consider quantitative materiality and qualitative factors in (i) planning the scope of our audit work and in evaluating the results of our work; and (ii) to evaluate the effect of any identified misstatements in the Ind-AS financial statements.

We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.

We also provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards.

From the matters communicated with those charged with governance, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the Ind-AS financial statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditor’s report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be communicated in our report because the

adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order, 2020 (“the Order”), issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub section (11) of section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013, we give in the Annexure A, a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order, to the extent applicable.

2. As required by section 143(3) of the Act, we report that:

a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit.

b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books.

c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss (including Other Comprehensive Income), the Cash Flows Statement and the Statement of Changes in Equity dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account.

d) In our opinion, the aforesaid Ind-AS financial statements comply with the Accounting Standards specified under section 133 of the Act, read with the relevant rules issued thereunder.

e) On the basis of the written representations received from the Directors of the Company as on June 30, 2022, taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the Directors of the Company are disqualified as on June 30, 2022, from being appointed as a Director in terms of section 164 (2) of the Act.

f) With respect to the adequacy of the internal financial controls with reference to financial statements of the Company and the operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to our separate Report in Annexure B.

g) According to information and explanations given to us and based on our examination of the records of the Company, the Company has paid managerial remuneration in

accordance with the requisite approvals mandated by the provisions of section 197 of the Act.

h) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor’s Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014 (“the Rules”), in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i) The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position in its Ind-AS financial statements - Refer Note. 36 to the Ind-AS financial statements.

ii) The Company did not have any longterm contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses.

iii) There has been no delay in transferring amounts, required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.

iv) The Management has represented that:

a) to the best of its knowledge and belief, other than as disclosed in the standalone Ind-AS financial statements, no funds have been advanced or loaned or invested (either from borrowed funds or share premium or any other sources or kind of funds) by the Company to or in any other person or entity, including foreign entity (“Intermediaries”), with the understanding, whether recorded in writing or otherwise, that the Intermediary shall, whether, directly or indirectly lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or on behalf of the Company (“Ultimate Beneficiaries”) or provide any guarantee, security or the like on behalf of the Ultimate Beneficiaries;

b) to the best of its knowledge and belief, other than as disclosed in the standalone Ind-AS financial statements, no funds have been received by the Company from any

person or entity, including foreign entity (“Funding Parties”), with the understanding, whether recorded in writing or otherwise, that the Company shall, whether, directly or indirectly, lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or on behalf of the Funding Party (“Ultimate Beneficiaries”) or provide any guarantee, security or the like on behalf of the Ultimate Beneficiaries;

Based on such audit procedures performed by us which is considered reasonable and appropriate in the circumstances, nothing has come to their notice that has caused us to believe that the representations under sub-clause (i) and (ii) of Rule 11 (e) of the Rules as provided under a) and (b) above contain any material misstatement.

v) As per information and explanation represented by Management and based

on the records of the Company, the dividend proposed in the previous year, declared and paid by the Company during the year is in accordance with section 123 of the Act, as applicable.

The Board of Directors of the Company have proposed final dividend for the year which is subject to the approval of the members at the ensuing Annual General Meeting. The amount of dividend proposed is in accordance with section 123 of the Act, as applicable.

For KALYANIWALLA & MISTRY LLP CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

Firm Regn. No.: 104607W / W100166

Daraius Z. Fraser Partner

M. No.42454 UDIN: 22042454APNGBA5383

Mumbai: August 22, 2022.


Jun 30, 2021

to the members of Gillette india limited

Report on the Audit of the Ind AS Financial Statements

Opinion

We have audited the accompanying Ind AS Financial Statements of GILLETTE INDIA LIMITED (“the Company”), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at June 30, 2021, the Statement of Profit and Loss (including other comprehensive income), the Statement of Changes in Equity, the Statement of Cash Flows for the year then ended and the Notes to the Ind-AS financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information (hereinafter referred to as ‘financial statements’).

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid Ind-AS financial statements give the information required by the Companies Act, 2013 (the Act) in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the Indian Accounting Standards prescribed under section 133 of the Act read with the Companies (Indian Accounting

Standard) Rules, 2015, as amended (Ind-AS), and with other accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at June 30, 2021, the profit, total comprehensive income, changes in equity and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Basis for Opinion

We conducted our audit of the Ind-AS financial statements in accordance with the Standards on Auditing (SAs) specified under section 143(10) of the Companies Act, 2013. Our responsibilities under those Standards are further described in the ‘Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements’ section of our report. We are independent of the Company in accordance with the Code of Ethics issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India together with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the Ind-AS financial statements under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and the Rules thereunder, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the Code of Ethics. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

Key Audit Matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the Ind-AS financial statements of the current period. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the Ind-AS financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters. We have determined the matters described below to be the key audit matters to be communicated in our report.

Sr.

Key Audit Matter

Auditor’s Response

1.

Revenue Recognition (note no. 2.3(a) and 19 to the financial statements)

Revenue is measured net of trade discounts, rebates and various types of Marketing and Distribution Activities such as incentives and promotions.

The estimation of the various types of discounts, incentives and rebate schemes to be recognised based on sales made during the year is material and considered to be judgmental owing to the varying terms of the agreements with customers which are based on annual contracts or shorter term arrangements. In addition, the value and timing of promotions for products varies from period to period, and the activity can span over a year end.

Our audit procedures included:

(a) Assessing the appropriateness of the revenue recognition accounting policies, including those relating to discounts and incentives by comparing with applicable accounting standards.

(b) Testing the design, implementation and operating effectiveness of the Company’s general IT controls and key IT/manual application controls over the Company’s systems which govern recording of revenue and rebates/schemes in the general ledger accounting system.

Sr.

Key Audit Matter

Auditor’s Response

Accumulated experience is used to estimate the provision for discounts and rebates considering the terms of the underlying schemes and arrangements with customers.

There is also a risk that revenue may be overstated due to fraud including through manipulation of the discounts and incentives recognised resulting from the pressure local management may feel to achieve performance targets.

(c) We tested the design, implementation and operating effectiveness of controls over the calculation of discounts and rebates including review of the independent service auditor’s SOC 1 (Type 2) report with regards to the third party service organization’s system and the suitability of the design and operating effectiveness of IT / manual controls relating to processing of claims.

(d) Performing substantive testing (including year-end cut-off testing) by selecting samples of revenue transactions recorded during the year (and before and after the financial year end) by verifying the underlying documents, which included sales invoices/contracts and shipping documents.

(e) We compared the historical discounts, rebates/schemes and allowances to current payment trends. We also considered the historical accuracy of the Company’s estimates in previous years.

(f) Performing substantive testing by checking samples of rebate/schemes transactions to supporting documentation.

(g) We assessed manual journals posted to revenue to identify unusual items

(h) Considering the adequacy of the Company’s disclosures in respect of revenue.

2. Uncertain Tax Positions (note no. 26 and 35 to the

Our

audit procedures included:

financial statements)

(a)

We evaluated the design and tested the

The Company is subject to a range of tax

operating effectiveness of controls over the

risks. There is inherent judgement involved in

assessment of uncertain tax positions and

determining provisions for uncertain tax positions.

completeness of disclosures.

The Company is subject to periodic challenges

(b)

We discussed the status and potential

by local tax authorities on a range of tax matters

exposures in respect of significant tax

during the normal course of business, including

litigations with the Company’s tax team

direct taxes, transfer pricing and indirect taxes.

including their views on the likely outcome of

Applicable tax laws and regulations are subject

each assessment / litigation and magnitude

to differing interpretations and the resolution of a final tax position can take several years to

of potential exposure.

complete. Where the amount of tax payable is uncertain, the Company establishes provisions based on Management’s judgement of the likelihood of settlement being required.

(c)

We focused on the judgements made by Management in assessing the likelihood of potentially material exposures and the estimates used to determine such provisions where required. In particular, we focused on

Given the number of judgements involved in

the impact of changes in local tax regulations

estimating the provisions relating to uncertain tax

and ongoing inspections by local tax

positions and the complexities of dealing with tax

authorities, which could materially impact the

rules, this was considered as a key audit matter.

amounts recorded in the financial statements.

Sr.

Key Audit Matter

Auditor’s Response

(d) We involved our in-house tax experts to evaluate and challenge the appropriateness of Management''s assessment and judgements to estimate the provisions held in respect of uncertain tax positions. To do this, we assessed the provisions recognized in the financial statements using the outcome of prior and ongoing tax assessments conducted on the Company, correspondences between the Company and relevant tax authorities, judgemental positions taken in tax returns and current year estimates, our own experience in these areas and assessing whether the approach applied by the Company is supported by the practice in the industry.

(e) We have also assessed the adequacy of the Company''s disclosures in respect of tax and uncertain tax positions.

Information Other than the Ind-AS financial statements and Auditor’s Report Thereon

The Company’s Board of Directors is responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the Director’s Report and the Report on Corporate Governance but does not include the Ind-AS financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon which we obtained prior to the date of this auditor’s report.

Our opinion on the Ind-AS financial statements does not cover the other information and we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the Ind-AS financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the Ind-AS financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.

Management’s Responsibility for the Ind-AS financial statements

The Company’s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 (“the Act”) with respect to the preparation of these Ind-AS financial statements that give a

true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance, changes in equity and the cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards specified under section 133 of the Act. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding of the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the Ind-AS financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the Ind-AS financial statements, Management is responsible for assessing the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless Management either intends to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.

The Board of Directors are also responsible for overseeing the Company’s financial reporting process.

Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the ind-AS financial statements

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the Ind-AS financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with SAs will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these Ind-AS financial statements.

As part of an audit in accordance with SAs, we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. We also:

• Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.

• Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. Under section 143(3)(i) of the Companies Act, 2013, we are also responsible for expressing our opinion on whether the company has adequate internal financial controls system in place and the operating effectiveness of such controls.

• Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by Management.

• Conclude on the appropriateness of Management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast

significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Company to cease to continue as a going concern.

• Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the financial statements, including the disclosures, and whether the financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.

Materiality is the magnitude of misstatements in the financial statements that, individually or in aggregate, makes it probable that the economic decisions of the users of the financial statements may be influenced. We consider quantitative materiality and qualitative factors in (i) planning the scope of our audit work and in evaluating the results of our work; and (ii) to evaluate the effect of any identified misstatements in the Ind-AS financial statements.

We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.

We also provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards.

From the matters communicated with those charged with governance, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the Ind-AS financial statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditor’s report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be communicated in our report because the adverse

consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order, 2016 (“the Order”), issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub section (11) of section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013, we give in the Annexure A, a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order, to the extent applicable.

2. As required by section 143(3) of the Act, we report that:

a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit.

b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books.

c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss (including Other Comprehensive Income), the Cash Flow Statement and the Statement of Changes in Equity dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account.

d) In our opinion, the aforesaid Ind-AS financial statements comply with the Accounting Standards specified under section 133 of the Act, read with relevant rules issued thereunder.

e) On the basis of the written representations received from the Directors as on June 30, 2021, taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the Directors are disqualified as on June 30, 2021 from being appointed as a Director in terms of Section 164 (2) of the Act.

f) With respect to the adequacy of the internal financial controls with reference to financial statements of the Company and

the operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to our separate Report in Annexure B.

g) According to information and explanations given to us and based on our examination of the records of the Company, the Company has paid managerial remuneration in accordance with the requisite approvals mandated by the provisions of Section 197 of the Act.

h) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor’s Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i) The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position in its Ind-AS financial statements - Refer Note. 35 to the Ind-AS financial statements.

ii) The Company did not have any longterm contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses.

iii) There has been no delay in transferring amounts, required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.

For KALYANIWALLA & MISTRY LLP

chartered accountants

Firm Regn. No.: 104607W / W100166

Daraius Z. Fraser Partner

M. No.42454 UDIN: 21042454AAAADZ7425

Mumbai: August 24, 2021.


Jun 30, 2018

Report on Audit of the Ind AS Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying Ind AS financial statements of Gillette India Limited (“the Company”), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at June 30, 2018, the Statement of Profit and Loss (including other comprehensive income), the Statement of Changes in Equity and the Statement of Cash Flows for the year then ended, including a summary of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory information (hereinafter referred to as the Ind AS financial statements).

Management’s Responsibility for the Ind AS Financial Statements

The Company’s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 (“the Act”) with respect to the preparation of these Ind AS financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance including other comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) prescribed under section 133 of the Act read with relevant Rules issued thereunder.

This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the Ind AS financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor’s Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these Ind AS financial statements based on our audit.

We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made thereunder.

We conducted our audit of the Ind AS financial statements in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the Ind AS financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the Ind AS financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the Ind AS financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant to the Company’s preparation of the Ind AS financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Company’s Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the Ind AS financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the Ind AS financial statements.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid Ind AS financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India including the Ind AS, of the state of affairs of the Company as at June 30, 2018, its profit (including other comprehensive income), changes in equity and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Other Matter

The comparative financial information of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2017, included in these Ind AS financial statements have been audited by the predecessor auditor whose report for the year ended June 30, 2017 expressed an unmodified opinion on those audited financial statements vide their audit report dated August 24, 2017.

Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order, 2016 (“the Order”) issued by the Central Government in terms of section 143(11) of the Act, we give in “Annexure A” a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.

2. As required by section 143(3) of the Act, we report that:

a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit.

b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books.

c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss (including Other Comprehensive Income), Statement of Changes in Equity and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account.

d) In our opinion, the aforesaid Ind AS financial statements comply with the Indian Accounting Standards prescribed under section 133 of the Act read with relevant rules issued thereunder.

e) On the basis of the written representations received from the Directors as on June 30, 2018, taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the Directors is disqualified as on June 30, 2018, from being appointed as a Director in terms of section 164(2) of the Act.

f) With respect to the adequacy of the internal financial controls over financial reporting of the Company and the operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to our separate Report in “Annexure B”.

g) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor’s Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i) The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position in its Ind AS financial statements - Refer Note 35 to the Ind AS financial statements.

ii) The Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses.

iii) There has been no delay in transferring amounts, required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.

ANNEXURE - “A” TO THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT

Referred to in paragraph 1 under ‘Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements’ in our Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of the Company on the Ind AS Financial Statements for the year ended June 30, 2018.

1. Fixed Assets:

a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

b) As explained to us, the Company has a program for physical verification of fixed assets at periodic intervals. In our opinion, the period of verification is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. The discrepancies reported on such verification are not material and have been properly dealt with in the books of account.

c) According to the information and explanations given to us, the title deeds, comprising all the immovable properties of buildings, other than self-constructed buildings, are held in the name of the Company. In respect of immovable properties of land that have been taken on lease and disclosed as non-current / current assets in the financial statements, the lease agreements are in the name of the Company, where the Company is the lessee in the agreement.

2. The inventory has been physically verified by the Management at reasonable intervals during the year. In our opinion, the frequency of such verification is reasonable. In respect of inventory lying with third parties, these have substantially been confirmed by them. The discrepancies noticed on verification between the physical stocks and the book records were not material.

3. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured, to companies, firms, limited liability partnerships or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 189 of the Act.

4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has complied with the provisions of sections 185 and 186 of the Act, with respect to investments made, guarantees given and securities provided.

5. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not accepted deposits from the public to which the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and the provisions of sections 73 to 76 of the Act and the rules framed thereunder apply.

6. According to the information and explanations given to us, the maintenance of cost records has not been prescribed by the Central Government under section 148(1) of the Act.

7. According to the information and explanations given to us and records of the Company examined by us, in our opinion:

a) the Company is generally regular in depositing the undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, employees’ state insurance, income-tax, sales tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value added tax, goods and services tax, cess, profession tax and other material statutory dues, as applicable, with the appropriate authorities and there are no undisputed amounts payable in arrears as at June 30, 2018 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

b) there are no dues of income-tax, sales tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value added tax and goods and services tax which have not been deposited with the appropriate authorities on account of any dispute, other than the following:

Name of Statute

Nature of Dues

Forum where Dispute is Pending

Period to which the Amount Relates*

Amount Involved (Rs. in lakhs)**

The Central Excise Act, 1944

Excise Duty

Appellate Authority -up to Commissioners/ Revisional authorities level

1994-95 to 1997-98, 2002-03 to 2016-17

30 416

Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal

1994-95 to 1998-99, 2002-03 to 2007-08

164

High Court

1990-91

9

Supreme Court

2000-01

6

Sales Tax and Laws as per statutes applicable in various states

Sales Tax and VAT

Appellate Authority -up to Commissioners/ Revisional authorities level

1999-00 to 2016-17

4 463

Tribunal

1997-98, 1999-00, 2002-03, 2005-06 to 2010-11

36

High Court

2005-06

60

Customs Act, 1962

Customs Duty

Appellate Authority -up to Commissioners/ Revisional authorities level

2000-01, 2005-06, 2006-07, 2012-13

1 582

Tribunal

1995-96

27

Finance Act, 1994

Service Tax

Appellate Authority -up to Commissioners/ Revisional authorities level

2001-02, 2004-06, 2007-08 to 2015-16

2 626

Tribunal

2010-11 to 2013-14

81

* Period denotes the financial year April to March

** includes penalty and interest on taxes, wherever applicable

8. The Company has not taken any loans or borrowings from financial institutions, banks or government nor has issued any debentures.

9. The Company has not raised any money by way of initial public offer, further public offer (including debt instruments) or term loans during the year.

10. According to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud by the Company or on the Company by its officers or employees has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.

11. According to the information and explanations given to us and based on our examination of the records, the Company has paid / provided for managerial remuneration in accordance with the requisite approvals mandated by the provisions of section 197 read with Schedule V to the Act.

12. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company is not a Nidhi company.

13. According to the information and explanations given to us and based on our examination of the records of the Company, transactions with the related parties are in compliance with sections 177 and 188 of the Act where applicable. The details of such related party transactions have been disclosed in the Ind AS financial statements as required by the applicable accounting standards.

14. According to the information and explanations give to us and based on our examination of the records, the Company has not made any preferential allotment or private placement of shares or fully or partly convertible debentures during the year.

15. According to the information and explanations given to us and based on our examination of the records, the Company has not entered into any non-cash transactions with Directors or persons connected with him.

16. The Company is not required to be registered under section 45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934.

For KALYANIWALLA & MISTRY LLP

CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

Firm Regn. No.: 104607W / W100166

Daraius Z. Fraser

Partner

M. No. 42454

Place : Mumbai

Date : August 23, 2018.


Jun 30, 2017

To the Members of Gillette India Limited

Report on the Ind AS Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying Ind AS financial statements of Gillette India Limited ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at June 30, 2017, and the Statement of Profit and Loss (including Other Comprehensive Income), the Cash Flow Statement and the Statement of Changes in Equity for the year then ended, and a summary of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management''s Responsibility for the Ind AS Financial Statements

The Company''s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act") with respect to the preparation of these Ind AS financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance including other comprehensive income, cash flows and changes in equity of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) specified under Section 133 of the Act.

This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the Ind AS financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor''s Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these Ind AS financial statements based on our audit.

In conducting our audit, we have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made there under.

We conducted our audit of the Ind AS financial statements in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the Ind AS financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the Ind AS financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the Ind AS financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant to the Company''s preparation of the Ind AS financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Company''s Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the Ind AS financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence obtained by us is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the Ind AS financial statements.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid Ind AS financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at June 30, 2017, and its profit, total comprehensive income, its cash flows and the changes in equity for the year ended on that date.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by Section 143(3) of the Act, based on our audit, we report, to the extent applicable that:

(a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit.

(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books.

(c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss including Other Comprehensive Income, the Cash Flow Statement and Statement of Changes in Equity dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account.

(d) I n our opinion, the aforesaid Ind AS financial statements comply with the Indian Accounting Standards prescribed under Section 133 of the Act.

(e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on June 30, 2017 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on June 30, 2017 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164(2) of the Act.

(f) With respect to the adequacy of the internal financial controls over financial reporting of the Company and the operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to our separate Report in "Annexure A". Our report expresses an unmodified opinion on the adequacy and operating effectiveness of the Company''s internal financial controls over financial reporting.

(g) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor''s Report in accordance with Rule

11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, as amended, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i. The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position in its Ind AS financial statements.

ii. The Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses.

iii. There has been no delay in transferring amounts, required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.

iv. The Company did not have any holdings or dealings in Specified Bank Notes as defined in the Notification S.O. 3407(E) dated the November 8, 2016 of the Ministry of Finance, during the period from November 8, 2016 to December 30,

2016.

2. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2016 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government in terms of Section 143(11) of the Act, we give in "Annexure B" a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.

Report on the Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting under Clause (i) of Sub-section 3 of Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act")

We have audited the internal financial controls over financial reporting of Gillette India Limited ("the Company") as of June 30, 2017 in conjunction with our audit of the Ind AS financial statements of the Company for the year ended on that date.

Management''s Responsibility for Internal Financial Controls

The Company''s Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal financial controls based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India ("ICAI"). These responsibilities include the design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls that were operating effectively for ensuring the orderly and efficient conduct of its business, including adherence to Company''s policies, the safeguarding of its assets, the prevention and detection of frauds and errors, the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, and the timely preparation of reliable financial information, as required under the Companies Act, 2013.

Auditor''s Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company''s internal financial controls over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting (the "Guidance Note") issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the Standards on Auditing prescribed under Section 143(10) of the Companies Act, 2013, to the extent applicable to an audit of internal financial controls. Those Standards and the Guidance Note require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether adequate internal financial controls over financial reporting was established and maintained and if such controls operated effectively in all material respects.

Our audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the adequacy of the internal financial controls system over financial reporting and their operating effectiveness. Our audit of internal financial controls over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal financial controls over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the Company''s internal financial controls system over financial reporting.

Meaning of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting

A Company''s internal financial control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of Ind AS financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A Company''s internal financial control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of Management and Directors of the Company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company''s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Inherent Limitations of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting

Because of the inherent limitations of internal financial controls over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper Management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of the internal financial controls over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the internal financial control over financial reporting may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Opinion

In our opinion, to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the Company has, in all material respects, an adequate internal financial controls system over financial reporting and such internal financial controls over financial reporting were operating effectively as at June 30, 2017, based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.

(i) a. The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of the property, plant and equipment.

b. The property, plant and equipment were physically verified during the year by the Management in accordance with a regular programme of verification which, in our opinion, provides for physical verification of all the property, plant and equipment at reasonable intervals. According to the information and explanations given to us no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

c. According to the information and explanations given to us and the records examined by us and based on the examination of the registered sale deed / transfer deed / conveyance deed provided to us, we report that, the title deeds, comprising all the immovable properties of buildings, other than self-constructed buildings, are held in the name of the Company as at the balance sheet date. In respect of immovable properties of land that have been taken on lease and disclosed as non-current / current assets in the financial statements, the lease agreements are in the name of the Company, where the Company is the lessee in the agreement.

(ii) As explained to us, the inventories were physically verified during the year by the Management at reasonable intervals and no material discrepancies were noticed on such physical verification.

(iii) The Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured, to companies, firms, Limited Liability Partnerships or other parties covered in the Register maintained under Section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013.

(iv) I n our opinion and according to the information and explanation given to us, the Company has complied with the provisions of Section 185 and 186 of the Companies Act, 2013 in respect of grant of loans, making investments and providing guarantees and securities, as applicable.

(v) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not accepted any deposit during the year within the meaning of the provisions of Sections 73 and 76 or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 2013. According to the information and explanations given to us, no order has been passed by the Company Law Board or the National Company Law Tribunal or the Reserve Bank of India or any Court or any other Tribunal on the Company.

(vi) The maintenance of cost records has not been prescribed by the Central Government under Section 148(1) of the Companies Act, 2013.

(vii) According to the information and explanations given to us and according to the books and records as produced and examined by us, in our opinion:

a. The Company has been regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues including Provident Fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Service Tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty, Value Added Tax, Cess and other material statutory dues as applicable to it with the appropriate authorities.

b. As at June 30, 2017, the following are the particulars of dues on account of Income Tax, Sales Tax, Service Tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty and Value Added Tax matters that have not been deposited on account of any disputes:

Name of Statute

Nature of Dues

Forum where Dispute is Pending

Period to which the Amount

Relates*

Amount Involved ('' in lakhs)

The Central Excise Act, 1944

Excise

duty

Appellate Authority -up to Commissioners/ Revisional authorities level

1994-95 to 1997-98, 2002-03, 2004-05, 2008-09 to 2015-16

24 801

Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal

1994-95 to 1998-99, 2004-05 to 2007-08

150

High Court

1990-91

9

Sub-total

24 960

Finance Act, 1994

Service

tax

Appellate Authority -up to Commissioners/ Revisional authorities level

2001-02, 2003-04 to 2005-06, 2007-08 to 2014-15

2 431

Sub-total

2 431

Customs Act, 1962

Custom

Duty

Appellate Authority -up to Commissioners/ Revisional authorities level

2000-01, 2005-06, 2006-07, 2012-13

1 582

Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal

1995-96

27

Sub-total

1 609

Name of Statute

Nature of Dues

Forum where Dispute is Pending

Period to which the Amount Relates*

Amount Involved ('' in lakhs)

Sales Tax and Laws as per statutes applicable in various states

Sales Tax and VAT

Appellate Authority -up to Commissioners/ Revisional authorities level

1999-00 to 2013-14

2 707

Appellate Authority -Tribunal

1997-98, 1999-00, 2002-03, 2005-06 to 2010-11

1 06

High Court

2005-06

60

Sub-total

2 873

The Income Tax Act, 1961

Income

Tax

Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)

201 1-12, 2012-13

3 665

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

2010-11

10 529

Sub-total

14 194

Total

46 067

* generally, the year refers to the period April to March.

Out of the total disputed dues aggregating Rs, 46 067 lakhs as above, Rs, 14 194 lakhs has been stayed for recovery by the relevant authorities.

(viii) The Company has not taken any loans or borrowings from financial institutions, banks and government or has not issued any debentures and hence reporting under clause (viii) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

(ix) The Company has not raised moneys by way of initial public offer or further public offer (including debt instruments) or term loans and hence reporting under clause (ix) of the Order is not applicable.

(x) To the best of our knowledge and according to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud by the Company and no material fraud on the Company by its officers or employees has been noticed or reported during the year.

(xi) I n our opinion and according to the information and explanation given to us, the Company has paid / provided managerial remuneration in accordance with the requisite approvals mandated by the provisions of section 197 read with Schedule V to the Companies Act, 2013.

(xii) The Company is not a Nidhi Company and hence reporting under clause (xii) of the Order is not applicable.

(xiii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us the Company is in compliance with Section 177 and 188 of the Companies Act, 2013, where applicable, for all transactions with the related parties and the details of related party transactions have been disclosed in the financial statements etc. as required by the applicable accounting standards.

(xiv) During the year the Company has not made any preferential allotment or private placement of shares or fully or partly convertible debentures and hence reporting under clause (xiv) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

(xv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, during the year the Company has not entered into any non-cash transactions with its directors or directors of its holding Company or persons connected with them and hence provisions of section 192 of the Companies Act, 2013 are not applicable. The Company did not have any subsidiary or associate Company during the year.

(xvi) The Company is not required to be registered under section 45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934.

For DELOITTE HASKINS & SELLS LLP

Chartered Accountants

(Firm''s Registration No. 117366W/W-100018)

sd/-

Shyamak R Tata

Partner

(Membership No. 038320)

MUMBAI, August 24, 2017


Jun 30, 2016

To the Members of

Gillette India Limited

Report on the Financial Statements

1. We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Gillette India Limited ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at June 30, 2016, the Statement of Profit and Loss and the Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management''s Responsibility for the Financial

Statements

2. The Company''s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act") with respect to the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, as applicable. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditors'' Responsibility

3. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made there under. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under

Section 143(10) of the Act and the Order under section 143(11) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

4. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant to the Company''s preparation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Company''s Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

5. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the financial statements.

Opinion

6. I n our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at June 30, 2016, and its profit and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

7. As required by Section 143(3) of the Act, we report that:

(a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit.

(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books.

(c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account.

(d) In our opinion, the aforesaid financial statements comply with the Accounting Standards prescribed under Section 133 of the Act, as applicable.

(e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on June 30, 2016 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on June 30, 2016 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164(2) of the Act.

(f) With respect to the adequacy of the internal financial controls over financial reporting of the Company and the operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to our separate Report in "Annexure A". Our report expresses an unmodified opinion on the adequacy and operating effectiveness of the Company''s internal financial controls over financial reporting.

(g) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor''s Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i. The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position in its financial statements in accordance with the generally accepted accounting practice - also Refer Note 24(a) to the financial statements.

ii. The Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses.

iii. There has been no delay in transferring amounts, required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company

8. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2016 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government in terms of Section 143(11) of the Act, we give in "Annexure B" a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.

Report on the Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting under Clause (i) of Sub-section 3 of Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act")

We have audited the internal financial controls over financial reporting of Gillette India Limited ("the Company") as of June 30, 2016 in conjunction with our audit of the financial statements of the Company for the year ended on that date.

Management''s Responsibility for Internal Financial Controls

The Company''s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal financial controls based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. These responsibilities include the design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls that were operating effectively for ensuring the orderly and efficient conduct of its business, including adherence to Company''s policies, the safeguarding of its assets, the prevention and detection of frauds and errors, the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, and the timely preparation of reliable financial information, as required under the Companies Act, 2013.

Auditor''s Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company''s internal financial controls over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting (the "Guidance Note") issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the Standards on Auditing prescribed under Section 143(10) of the Companies Act, 2013, to the extent applicable to an audit of internal financial controls. Those Standards and the Guidance Note require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether adequate internal financial controls over financial reporting was established and maintained and if such controls operated effectively in all material respects.

Our audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the adequacy of the internal financial controls system over financial reporting and their operating effectiveness. Our audit of internal financial controls over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal financial controls over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the Company''s internal financial controls system over financial reporting.

Meaning of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting

A Company''s internal financial control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A Company''s internal financial control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company''s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Inherent Limitations of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting

Because of the inherent limitations of internal financial controls over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of the internal financial controls over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the internal financial control over financial reporting may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Opinion

In our opinion, to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the Company has, in all material respects, an adequate internal financial controls system over financial reporting and such internal financial controls over financial reporting were operating effectively as at June 30, 201 6, based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.

(i) a. The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of the fixed assets.

b. The fixed assets were physically verified during the year by the Management in accordance with a regular programme of verification which, in our opinion, provides for physical verification of all the fixed assets at reasonable intervals. According to the information and explanations given to us no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

c. With respect to immovable properties of land and buildings that are freehold, according to the information and explanations given to us and the records examined by us and based on the examination of the registered sale deed / transfer deed / conveyance deed provided to us, we report that, the title deeds of such immovable properties are held in the name of the Company as at the balance sheet date. In respect of immovable properties of land and buildings that have been taken on lease and disclosed as fixed asset in the financial statements, the lease agreements are in the name of the Company, where the Company is the lessee in the agreement.

(ii) As explained to us, the inventories were physically verified during the year by the Management at reasonable intervals and no material discrepancies were noticed on such physical verification.

(iii) The Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured, to companies, firms, Limited Liability Partnerships or other parties covered in the Register maintained under Section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013.

(iv) I n our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has complied with the provisions of Section 185 and 186 of the Companies Act, 2013 in respect of grant of loans, making investments and providing guarantees and securities, as applicable.

(v) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not accepted any deposit during the year within the meaning of the provisions of Sections 73 and 76 or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 2013. According to the information and explanations given to us, no order has been passed by the Company Law Board or the National Company Law Tribunal or the Reserve Bank of India or any Court or any other Tribunal on the Company.

(vi) The maintenance of cost records has been prescribed by the Central Government under Section 148(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 in respect of specified products of the Company. For such products, we have broadly reviewed the cost records maintained by the Company pursuant to the Companies (Cost Records and Audit) Rules, 2014, as amended, and are of the opinion that, prima facie, the prescribed cost records have been made and maintained. We have, however, not made a detailed examination of the cost records with a view to determine whether they are accurate or complete.

(vii) According to the information and explanations given to us and according to the books and records as produced and examined by us, in our opinion:

a. The Company has been regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues including Provident fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Service Tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty, Value Added Tax, Cess and other material statutory dues as applicable to it with the appropriate authorities.

b. As at June 30, 2016, the following are the particulars of dues on account of Income Tax, Sales Tax, Service Tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty and Value Added Tax matters that have not been deposited on account of any disputes:

Name of Statute

Nature of Dues

Forum where Dispute is Pending

Period to which the Amount

Relates*

Amount Involved (Rs, in lakhs)

The Central Excise Act, 1944

Excise

duty

Appellate Authority -up to Commissioners/ Provisional authorities level

1994-95 to 1997-98, 2002-03, 2004-05, 2008-09 to 2015-16

24 801

Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal

1994-95 to 1998-99, 2004-05 to 2007-08

150

High Court

1990-91

9

Sub-total

24 960

Name of Statute

Nature of Dues

Forum where Dispute is Pending

Period to which the Amount Relates3

Amount Involved (Rs, in lakhs)

Finance Act, 1994

Service

tax

Appellate Authority -up to Commissioners/ Revisional authorities level

2001-02, 2003-04 to 2005-06, 2007-08 to 2014-15

2 431

Sub-total

2 431

Customs Act, 1962

Custom

Duty

Appellate Authority -up to Commissioners/ Revisional authorities level

2000-01, 2005-06, 2006-07, 2012-13

1 582

Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal

1995-96

27

Sub-total

1 609

Sales Tax and Laws as per statutes applicable in various states

Sales Tax and VAT

Appellate Authority -up to Commissioners/ Revisional authorities level

1999-00 to 2013-14

8 41

Appellate Authority -Tribunal

1997-98, 1999-00, 2002-03, 2005-06 to 2010-11

4 44

High Court

2005-06

60

Sub-total

1 345

The Income Tax Act, 1961

Income

Tax

Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)

2006-07, 2011-12

7 827

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11

15 549

Sub-total

23 376

Total

53 721

(xi) I n our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has paid / provided managerial remuneration in accordance with the requisite approvals mandated by the provisions of section 197 read with Schedule V to the Companies Act, 2013.

(xii) The Company is not a Nidhi Company and hence reporting under clause (xii) of the Order is not applicable.

(xiii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us the Company is in compliance with Section 177 and 188 of the Companies Act, 2013, where applicable, for all transactions with the related parties and the details of related party transactions have been disclosed in the financial statements etc. as required by the applicable accounting standards.

(xiv) During the year the Company has not made any preferential allotment or private placement of shares or fully or partly convertible debentures and hence reporting under clause (xiv) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

(xv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, during the year the Company has not entered into any non-cash transactions with its directors or directors of its holding, subsidiary or associate company or persons connected with them and hence provisions of section 192 of the Companies Act, 2013 are not applicable.

(xvi) The Company is not required to be registered under section 45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934.

For DELOITTE HASKINS & SELLS LLP

Chartered Accountants

(Firm''s Registration No. 117366W/W-100018)

sd/-

Shyamak R Tata

Partner

(Membership No. 038320)

MUMBAI,

August 23, 2016


Jun 30, 2015

Report on the Financial Statements

1. We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Gillette India Limited ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at June 30, 2015, the Statement of Profit and Loss and the Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management's Responsibility for the Financial Statements

2. The Company's Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act") with respect to the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgements and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditors' Responsibility

3. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made thereunder. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

4. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant to the Company's preparation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on whether the Company has in place an adequate internal financial controls system over financial reporting and the operating effectiveness of such controls. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Company's Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

5. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the financial statements.

Opinion

6. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at June 30, 2015, and its profit and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

7. As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2015 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government in terms of Section 143(11) of the Act, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.

8. As required by Section 143(3) of the Act, we report that:

(a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit.

(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books.

(c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account.

(d) In our opinion, the aforesaid financial statements comply with the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014.

(e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on June 30, 2015 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on June 30, 2015 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164(2) of the Act.

(f) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor's Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

a. The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position in its financial statements in accordance with Generally Accepted accounting practice - also Refer Note 24(a) to the financial statements.

b. The Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses.

c. There has been no delay in transferring amounts, required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.

In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the nature of the Company's business/activities during the year are such that clauses (ix) and (xi) of paragraph 3 and 4 of the Order are not applicable to the Company. In respect of the other clauses, we report as under:

(i) In respect of its fixed assets:

a. The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

b. The fixed assets were physically verified during the year by the Management in accordance with a regular programme of verification which, in our opinion, provides for physical verification of all the fixed assets at reasonable intervals. According to the information and explanations given to us no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

(ii) In respect of its inventories:

a. As explained to us, the inventories were physically verified during the year by the Management at reasonable intervals.

b. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the Management were reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company ' and the nature of its business.

c. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of its inventories and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.

(iii) The Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured, to companies, firms or other parties covered in the Register maintained under Section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, having regard to the explanations that some of the items are of special nature and suitable alternative sources are not readily available for obtaining comparable, quotations, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business for purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any major weakness in such internal control system.

(v) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not accepted any deposit during the year within the meaning of the provisions of Sections 73 and 76 or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 2013. According to the information and explanations given to us, no order has been passed by the Company Law Board or the National Company Law Tribunal or the Reserve Bank of India or any Court or any other Tribunal on the Company.

(vi) We have broadly reviewed the cost records maintained by the Company, pursuant to the Companies (Cost Records and Audit) Rules, 2014, as amended and prescribed by the Central Government under sub-section (1) of Section 148 of the Companies Act, 2013, and are of the opinion that, prima facie, the prescribed cost records have been made and maintained. We have, however, not made a detailed examination of the cost records with a view to determine whether they are accurate or complete.

(vii) According to the information and explanations given to us, and according to the books and records as produced and examined by us, in our opinion:

a. The Company is regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues, including Provident Fund, Employees' State Insurance, Income-Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty, Value Added Tax, Cess and other material statutory dues as applicable to it with the appropriate authorities.

b. As at June 30, 2015, the following are the particulars of dues on account of Income-Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Value Added Tax and Cess matters that have not been deposited on account of any dispute:

Name of Nature Forum where Statute of Dues Dispute is Pending

The Central Excise Appellate Authority - Excise Act, duty up to Commissioners/ 1944 Revisional authorities level

Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal

High Court

Sub-total

Finance Act, Service Appellate Authority - 1994 tax up to Commissioners/ Revisional authorities level

Sub-total

Customs Act, Custom Appellate Authority - 1962 Duty up to Commissioners/ Revisional authorities level

Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal

Sub-total

Sales Tax Sales Tax Appellate Authority - and Laws as and VAT up to Commissioners/ per statutes Revisional authorities applicable level in various states

Appellate Authority -Tribunal

High Court

Sub-total

The Income Income Income Tax Appellate Tax Act, Tax Tribunal 1961

Sub-total

Total

Name of Statute Period to which Amount the Amount Involved Relates* (Rs. in lakhs)

The Central Excise Act, 1944 1993-94 to 1997- 20,494 98, 2002-03, 2003-04, 2007-08 to 2014-15

1994-98,2004-07 150

1990-91 9

Sub-total 20,653

Finance Act, 1994 2001-02, 2003-04, 2,031 2005-06, 2007-08 to 2013-14

Sub-total 2,031

Customs Act, 1962 2000-01, 2005-06, 1,582 2006-07, 2012-13

1995-96 27

Sub-total 1,609

Sales Tax and Laws as Per Statutes applicable in Various States 1999-00 to 2,616 2013-14

1997-98, 1999-00, 374 2002-03, 2004-05, 2005-06 to 2009-10

2005-06 60

Sub-total 3,050

The Income Tax Act, 1961 2006-07, 2008-09, 5,882 2009-10

Sub-total 5,882 Total 33,225

Out of the total disputed dues aggregating Rs. 33 225 lakhs as above, Rs. 5 882 lakhs has been stayed for recovery by the relevant authorities.

c The Company has been regular in transferring amounts to the Investor Education and Protection Fund in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) and Rules made thereunder within time.

(viii) The Company does not have accumulated losses at the end of the financial year and the Company has not incurred cash losses during the financial year covered by our audit and in the immediately preceding financial year.

(ix) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not given guarantees for loans taken by others from banks and financial institutions.

(x) To the best of our knowledge and according to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud by the Company and no significant fraud on the Company has been noticed or reported during the year.

For DELOITTE HASKINS & SELLS LLP

Chartered Accountants

(Firm's Registration No. 117366WAV-100018)

Shyamak R Tata

Partner

MUMBAI, August 29, 2015 (Membership No. 038320)


Jun 30, 2014

1. We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Gillette India Limited ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at June 30, 2014, the Statement of Profit and Loss and the Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

2. The Company''s Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the Accounting Standards notified under the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act") (which continue to be applicable in respect of Section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013 in terms of General Circular 15/2013 dated 13th September, 2013 of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs) and in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India. This responsibility includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditors'' Responsibility

3. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with the ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

4. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers the internal control relevant to the Company''s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company''s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

5. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

6. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at June 30, 2014;

(b) in the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the profit of the Company for the year ended on that date; and

(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows of the Company for the year ended on that date.

Emphasis of Matter

7. Further, as reported for the previous year ended June 30, 2013, the Company had provided and since paid excess commission amounting to Rs. 24 lakhs (including service tax of Rs. 3 lakhs). The Company''s application to the Central Government for waiver is yet to be approved by the Central Government.

Our opinion is not qualified in respect of this matter.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

8. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government in terms of Section 227(4A) of the Act, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.

9. As required by Section 227(3) of the Act, we report that:

(a) We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit.

(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books.

(c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account.

(d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards notified under the Act (which continue to be applicable in respect of Section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013 in terms of General Circular 15/2013 dated 13th September, 2013 of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs).

(e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on June 30, 2014 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on June 30, 2014 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 274(1)(g) of the Act.

ANNEXURE TO THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR''S REPORT (Referred to in paragraph 8 under ''Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements'' section of our report of even date)

In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the nature of the Company''s business/activities during the year are such that clauses xi, xii, xiii, xiv, xvi, xix and xx of paragraph 4 of the Order are not applicable to the Company. In respect of the other clauses, we report as under:

(i) In respect of its fixed assets:

a. The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

b. The fixed assets were physically verified during the year by the Management in accordance with a regular programme of verification which, in our opinion, provides for physical verification of all the fixed assets at reasonable intervals. According to the information and explanations given to us no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

c. During the Financial Year, in our opinion, a substantial part of fixed assets has not been disposed off by the Company.

(ii) In respect of its inventories:

a. As explained to us, the inventories were physically verified during the year by the Management at reasonable intervals.

b. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the Management were reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

c. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of its inventories and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.

(iii) The Company has neither granted nor taken any loans, secured or unsecured, to/from companies, firms or other parties covered in the Register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, having regard to the explanations that some of the items purchased are of special nature and suitable alternative sources are not readily available for obtaining comparable quotations, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard to purchases of inventory and fixed assets and the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any major weakness in such internal control system.

(v) To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information and explanations given to us, there are no contracts or arrangements that needed to be entered in the Register maintained in pursuance of Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(vi) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not accepted any deposit from the public during the year within the meaning of the provisions of Sections 58A & 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956.

(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an adequate internal audit system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

(viii) We have broadly reviewed the cost records maintained by the Company, as prescribed by the Central Government under Section 209(1)(d) of the Act and are of the opinion that prima facie the prescribed cost records have been maintained and are being made up. We have, however, not made a detailed examination of the cost records with a view to determine whether they are accurate or complete.

(ix) According to the information and explanations given to us and according to the books and records as produced and examined by us, in our opinion:

a. The Company has generally been regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor education and protection fund, employees'' state insurance, income tax, sales tax, wealth tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty, cess and other material statutory dues as applicable to it with the appropriate authorities.

b. There were no undisputed amounts payable in respect of provident fund, investor education and protection fund, employees'' state insurance, income tax, sales tax, wealth tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty, cess and other material statutory dues in arrears as at June 30, 2014 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

c. As at June 30, 2014, the following are the particulars of dues on account of income tax, sales tax, wealth tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty and cess, matters that have not been deposited on account of any disputes:

Name of Nature Forum where Period to which Amount Statute of Dues Dispute the Amount Involved is Pending Relates* (Rs. in lakhs)

The Central Excise Appellate Authority - 1994 - 98, 2002- 17 355 Excise Act, duty upto Commis -sioners/ 03, 2004, 2008 – 1944 Revisional authorities June 2014 level

Customs, Excise and 1994-98 150 Service Tax Appellate 2004-07 Tribunal

High Court 1991 9

Sub-total 17 514

Finance Act, Service Appellate Authority - 2001-02, 2004, 1 591 1994 tax upto Commiss -ioners/ 2005-06, 2007-08 Revisional authorities to June 2013 level

Sub-total 1 591

Customs Act, Custom Appellate Authority - 2005-07, 2000-01, 1 588 1962 Duty upto Commiss -ioners/ 2013 Revisional authorities level

Customs, Excise and 1996 27 Service Tax Appellate Tribunal

Sub-total 1 615

Sales Tax Sales Tax Appellate Authority - 1999-00 to 2010- 1 275 and Lawsas and VAT upto Commi - ssioners/ 11 per statutes Revisional authorities applicable level in various states

Appellate Authority 1997-98, 1999-00, 36 -Tribunal 2002-05, 2006-10

High Court 2005-06 60

Sub-total 1 371

The Income Income Income Tax Appellate 2006-07,2008-09 6 197 Tax Act, Tax Tribunal 1961

Sub-total 6 197

*generally, the year refers to the period April to March.

Out of the total disputed dues aggregating Rs. 28 288 lakhs as above, Rs. 6 197 lakhs has been stayed for recovery by the relevant authorities.

(x) The Company does not have accumulated losses at the end of the financial year and the Company has not incurred cash losses during the financial year covered by our audit and in the immediately preceding financial year.

(xi) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not given guarantee for loans taken by others from banks and financial institutions.

(xii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the Company, we report that funds raised on short-term basis have, prima facie, not been used during the year for long-term investment.

(xiii) During the year the Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to the parties and companies covered in the Register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(xiv) To the best of our knowledge and according to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud by the Company and no significant fraud on the Company has been noticed or reported during the year.

For DELOITTE HASKINS & SELLS LLP

Chartered Accountants

(Firm''s Registration No. 117366W/W-100018)

Shyamak R Tata

(Partner) MUMBAI, August 12, 2014 (Membership No. 038320)


Jun 30, 2013

Report on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Gillette India Limited ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at June 30, 2013, the Statement of Profit and Loss and the Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

The Company''s Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the Accounting Standards referred to in Section 211 (3C) of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act") and in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India. This responsibility includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditors'' Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with the ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers the internal control relevant to the Company''s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company''s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us. the aforesaid financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at June 30, 2013;

(b) in the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the profit of the Company for the year ended on that date: and

(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows of the Company for the year ended on that date.

Emphasis of Matter

We draw attention to Note 36 (b) to the financial statements regarding the excess commission provided but not paid to the Non-Executive Directors amounting to Rs. 24 lakhs (including service tax ofRs. 3 lakhs), which is subject to the approval of the Members at the ensuing Annual General Meeting of the Company and the Central Government.

Further, as reported for the previous year ended June 30, 2012, the Company had provided excess commission amounting to Rs. 48 lakhs (including service tax of Rs. 10 lakhs) which was since ratified by the Members of the Company at the 28th Annual General Meeting of the Company and paid during the current year, the application for which is as yet pending for approval with the Central Government.

Our opinion is not qualified in respect of this matter.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government in terms of Section 227(4A) of the Act, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.

2. As required by Section 227(3) of the Act, we report that:

(a) We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit.

(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books.

(c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash Flow'' Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account.

(d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards referred to in Section 211 (3C) of the Act.

(e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on June 30. 2013 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on June 30, 2013 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 274( l)(g) of the Act.

(i) Having regard to the nature of the Company''s business/ activities/results during the year, clauses x, xi. xii, xiii, xiv, xv, xvi, xviii, xix and xx of paragraph 4 of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

(ii) In respect of its fixed assets:

a. The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of the fixed assets.

b. The Company has a program of verification of fixed assets to cover all the items in a phased manner over a period of three years which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. Pursuant to the program, certain fixed assets were physically verified by the Management during the year. According to the information and explanations given to us no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

c. The fixed assets disposed off during the year, in our opinion, do not constitute a substantial part of the fixed assets of the Company and such disposal has, in our opinion, not affected the going concern status of the Company.

(iii) In respect of its inventories:

a. As explained to us, the inventories were physically verified during the year by the Management at reasonable intervals.

b. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the Management were reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

c. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of its inventories and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.

(iv) The Company has neither granted nor taken any loans, secured or unsecured, to/from companies, firms or other parties listed in the Register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(v) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, having regard to the explanations that some of the items purchased are of special nature and suitable alternative sources are not readily available for obtaining comparable quotations, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard to purchases of inventory and fixed assets and the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any major weakness in such internal control system.

(vi) According to the information and explanations given to us, there are no contracts or arrangements, the particulars of which needs to be entered in the register maintained in pursuance of Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(vii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not accepted any deposit from the public during the year within the meaning of the provisions of Sections 58A & 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. There are no unclaimed deposits as at the year end.

(viii) In our opinion, the Company has an adequate internal audit system commensurate with the size and the nature of its business.

(ix) We have broadly reviewed the cost records maintained by the Company pursuant to the Companies (Cost Accounting Records) Rules, 2011 prescribed by the Central Government under Section 209(1 )(d) of the Act and are of the opinion that, prima facie, the prescribed cost records have been maintained. We have, however, not made a detailed examination of the cost records with a view to determine whether they are accurate or complete.

(x) According to the information and explanations given to us, in respect of statutory dues:

a. The Company has generally been regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues, including Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund. Employees'' State Insurance, Income-tax, Sales Tax, Service Tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues as applicable to it with the appropriate authorities. The provisions relating to Wealth Tax are not applicable to the Company.

b. There were no undisputed amounts payable in respect of Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Customs Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues in arrears as at June 30, 2013, for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable except of Income-tax and Sales Tax dues

The above excludes disputed unpaid Excise demands of Rs. 2 934 lakhs raised by the authorities on the third parties with whom the company has business transactions/ contractual obligation.

There were no disputed dues remaining unpaid in respect of Cess during the year.

(xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the Company, we report that funds raised on short-term basis have, prima facie, not been used during the year for long-term investment.

(xii) To the best of our knowledge and according to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud by the Company and no material fraud on the Company has been noticed or reported during the year.

For DELOITTE HASKINS & SELLS

Chartered Accountants

(Firm Registration No. 117366W)

K. A. Katki

Partner

MUMBAI, August 06, 2013 (Membership No. 038568)


Jun 30, 2012

1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Gillette India Limited ("the Company"), as at June 30, 2012, the Statement of Profit and Loss and the Cash Flow Statement of the Company for the Year ended on that date, both annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in India. These Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatements. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the Management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

3. Attention is invited to:

(i) Note 36(a) to the financial statements regarding the re-appointment of the Managing Director of the Company which is subject to approval by the Central Government as required by sub-section (4) of Section 316 of the Companies Act, 1956, and the Members at the ensuing Annual General Meeting of the Company.

(ii) Note 36(b) to the financial statements, regarding the excess commission provided but not paid to the Non-Executive Directors amounting to Rs. 48 24 905 (including service tax of Rs. 9 88 800), which is subject to the approval of the Members at the ensuing Annual General Meeting of the Company and the Central Government.

4. As required by the Companies (Auditors' Report) Order, 2003 (CARO) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of Section 227(4A) of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure, a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.

5. Further to our comments as stated in paragraphs 3 and the Annexure referred to in Paragraph 4 above, we report as follows:

(a) we have obtained all the information and explanation which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

(b) in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books;

(c) the Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

(d) in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in compliance with the Accounting Standards referred to in Section 211 (3C) of the Companies Act, 1956;

(e) in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

(i) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at June 30, 2012;

(ii) in the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the profit of the Company for the Year ended on that date; and

(iii) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows of the Company for the Financial Year ended on that date.

6. On the basis of written representations received from the Directors as on June 30, 2012 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the Directors is disqualified as on June 30, 2012 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 274(1 )(g) of the Companies Act, 1956.

Annexure to the Auditor's Report

(Referred to in paragraph 4 of our report of even date)

(i) Having regard to the nature of the Company's business/ activities/result, clauses vi, x, xi, xii, xiii, xiv, xv, xvi, xviii, xix and xx of CARO are not applicable.

(ii) In respect of its fixed assets:

a. The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of the fixed assets.

b. The fixed assets were physically verified during the Year by the Management in accordance with a regular programme of verification, which in our opinion provides for physical verification of all the fixed assets within an interval of three years. According to the information and explanations given to us, no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

c. The fixed assets disposed off during the year, in our opinion, do not constitute a substantial part of the fixed assets of the Company and such disposal has, in our opinion, not affected the going concern status of the Company.

(iii) In respect of its inventory:

a. As explained to us, the inventories were physically verified by the Management at reasonable intervals during the period.

b. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the Management were reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

c. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of its inventories and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.

(iv) The Company has neither granted nor taken any loans, secured or unsecured, to/from companies, firms or other parties listed in the Register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(v) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, having regard to the explanations that some of the items purchased are of special nature and suitable alternative sources are not readily available for obtaining comparable quotations, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard to purchases of inventory and fixed assets and the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any major weakness in such internal control system.

(vi) According to the information and explanations given to us, there are no contracts or arrangements, the particulars of which needs to be entered in the register maintained in pursuance of Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an adequate internal audit system commensurate with the size and the nature of its business.

(viii) We have broadly reviewed the cost records maintained by the Company pursuant to the Companies (Cost Accounting Records) Rules, 2011 prescribed by the Central Government under Section 209(1 )(d) of the Companies Act, 1956 and are of the opinion that prima facie the prescribed cost records have been maintained. We have, however, not made a detailed examination of the cost records with a view to determine whether they are accurate or complete.

(ix) According to the information and explanations given to us in respect of statutory dues:

a. The Company has generally been regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues, including Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees' State Insurance, Income tax, Sales-tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues as applicable to it with the appropriate authorities. The provisions relating to Wealth Tax are not applicable to the Company.

b. There were no undisputed amounts payable in respect of Income-tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues in arrears as at June 30, 2012, for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

c. Details of Excise Duty, Service Tax, Sales tax and Custom Duty which have not been deposited as on June 30, 2012 on account of disputes are given below:

Statute Nature Forum where Period to which Amount of the dispute the amount involved dues is pending relates (Rs.)

The Central Excise Appellate Nov'94 - May'96, 829689387 Excise Act, duty Authority - upto Sep'95 - Nov'95, 1944 Commissi oners/ May-1996, Revisional July - 1997, authorities level Apr'02 - Jan'03, Apr'04 - Sep'04, Dec'04 - Sep'07, Apr'08 - Jan'12, Sep'09 - Mar'll

Appellate Apr'94 - Sep'96 14232540 Authority - Nov'96 - May'98 Tribunal

High Court 1991 891574

Sub- total 844813501

Finance Service Appellate 2001-02, 4954606 Act, 1994 tax Authority - upto Jan'04 - Dec'04, Commissioners/ Apr'05 - Mar'06, Revisional Apr'05 - Sep'05 authorities level

Sub- total 4954606

Customs Custom Appellate May'05 - Dec'06 157600562 Act, 1962 Duty Authority - upto Commissioners/ Revisional authorities level

Customs, Excise 1996 2653495 and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal

Sub- total 160254057

Sales Tax Sales Tax Appellate 1997-1998 to 215273908 Laws as Authority - upto 2009-2010 per statutes Commissioners/ applicable Revisional in various authorities level states Appellate 1997-1998, 15339400 Authority - 1999-2000, Tribunal 2002-2003, 2004-2005.

Sub- total 230613308

Himachal Entry Tax High Court April 2011 to 27185357 Pradesh Tax June 2012 on Entry of Goods into Local Area Act, 2010

Sub- total 27185357



The above excludes disputed unpaid Excise demands of Rs. 293896485 raised by the authorities on the third parties with whom the Company has business transactions/contractual obligation.

There were no disputed dues remaining unpaid in respect of Income Tax and Cess during the year.

(x) According to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the Company, we report that the funds raised on short term basis have not been used during the year for long term investment.

(xi) To the best of our knowledge and according to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud by the Company and no material fraud on the Company has been noticed or reported during the year.



For DELOITTE HASKINS & SELLS

Chartered Accountants

(Firm Registration No. 117366W)



K. A. Katki

Partner

Mumbai, August 23, 2012 (Membership No. 038568)


Jun 30, 2011

1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Gillette India Limited ("the Company"), as at June 30, 2011, the Profit and Loss account and also the Cash Flow Statement of the Company for the Financial Year ended on that date, both annexed thereto. These Financial Statements are the responsibility of the Company's Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these Financial Statements based on our audit.

2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Auditing Standards generally accepted in India. These Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the Financial Statements are free of material misstatements. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and the disclosures in the Financial Statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the Management, as well as evaluating the overall Financial Statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

3. Attention is invited to Note B5 of Schedule 17 annexed to and forming part of the Financial Statements, regarding the excess commission paid to the Non-Executive Directors amounting to Rs. 21.41 lakhs, which is subject to the approval of the Members at the ensuing 27th Annual General Meeting of the Company and the Central Government.

4. As required by the Companies (Auditors' Report) Order, 2003 (CARO) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of Section 227(4A) of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure, a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.

5. Further to our comments as stated in paragraph 3 and the Annexure referred to in Paragraph 4 above, we report as follows:

(a) we have obtained all the information and explanation which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

(b) in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the company so far as it appears from our examination of those books;

(c) the Balance Sheet, the Profit and Loss Account and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

(d) in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, the Profit and Loss Account and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in compliance with the Accounting Standards referred to in Section 211(3C) of the Companies Act, 1956;

(e) in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956 in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

(i) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at June 30, 2011;

(ii) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the profit of the Company for the Financial Year ended on that date; and

(iii) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows of the Company for the Financial Year ended on that date.

6. On the basis of written representations received from the Directors as on June 30, 2011 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the Directors is disqualified as on June 30, 2011 from being appointed as a Director in terms of Section 274(1 )(g) of the Companies Act, 1956.

Annexure to the Auditors' Report (Referred to in paragraph 4 of our report of even date)

(i) Having regard to the nature of the Company's business / activities / result, clauses vi, x, xi, xii, xiii, xiv, xv, xvi, xviii, xix and xx of CARO are not applicable.

(ii) In respect of its fixed assets

a. The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of the fixed assets.

b. The fixed assets were physically verified during the Financial Year by the Management in accordance with a regular programme of verification, which in our opinion provides for physical verification of all the fixed assets at reasonable intervals. According to the information and explanations given to us, no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

c. The fixed assets disposed off during the Financial Year, in our opinion, do not constitute a substantial part of the fixed assets of the Company and such disposal has, in our opinion, not affected the going concern status of the Company.

(iii) In respect of its inventory:

a. As explained to us, the inventories were physically verified by the management at reasonable intervals during the period.

b. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the Management were reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

c. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of its inventories and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.

(iv) The Company has neither granted nor taken any loans, secured or unsecured, to/from companies, firms or other parties listed in the Register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(v) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, having regard to the explanations that some of the items purchased are of special nature and suitable alternative sources are not readily available for obtaining comparable quotations, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard to purchases of inventory and fixed assets and the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any major weakness in such internal control system.

(vi) According to the information and explanations given to us, there are no contracts or arrangements, the particulars of which needs to be entered in the register maintained in pursuance of Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an adequate internal audit system commensurate with the size and the nature of its business.

(viii) We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the Company pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under Section 209(1 )(d) of the Companies Act, 1956 in respect of manufacture of shaving systems, and are of the opinion that prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have, however, not made a detailed examination of the records with a view to determining whether they are accurate or complete. To the best of our knowledge and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost records for any other product of the Company.

(ix) According to the information and explanations given to us in respect of statutory dues:

a. The Company has generally been regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues, including Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees' State Insurance, Income tax, Sales-tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues as applicable to it with the appropriate authorities.

b. There were no undisputed amounts payable in respect of Income-tax, Wealth Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues in arrears as at June 30, 2011, for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

c. Details of Excise duty, Service Tax, Sales tax and Custom Duty which have not been deposited as on June 30, 2011 on account of disputes are given below:

Statute Nature of Forum Period to which the Amount the dues where amount relates involved dispute is (Rs. in pending Lakhs)

The Central Excise Appellate May - 1996, Nov'94 - 5142.32 Excise Act, duty Authorities May '96, Jull '97 - 1944 July 31 '97, Apr '04- Sep '04, Sept - 1995 - Nov- 1995, Apr'02- Jan '03, Apr '02 - Jan '03, Dec '04 - Sept '07 and Apr '08 - Oct'10

Tribunal Apr '94 - Sep '96 142.33 Nov '96 - May '98

High Court 1991 8.92

Sub-total 5293.57

Finance Act, Service Appellate 2001-02, Jan '04 - Dec 49.55 1994 tax Authorities '04, Apr 05 to Mar 06, Apr 05 to Sep 05

Sub-total 49.55

Customs Act, Custom Appellate 1996-97, May 05 to 1554.60 1962 Duty Authorities Dec06

Sub-total 1554.60

Sales Tax Sales Tax Tribunal 1997-98,1999-2000, 155.05 Laws as 2000-2001, 2002-2003 per statutes & 2003-2004 applicable in Appellate 1997-1998 to 2009-10 2222.94 various states Authorities

Sub-total 2377.99

Himachal Entry Tax Appellate April 2011 to June 2011 90.30 Pradesh Tax Authorities on Entry of Goods into Local Area Act, 2010

Sub-total 90.30

The above excludes disputed unpaid Excise demands of Rs. 2771.47 lakhs raised by the authorities on the third parties with whom the company has business transactions/contractual obligation.

There were no disputed dues remaining unpaid in respect of Income Tax, Wealth Tax and Cess during the Financial Year.

(x) According to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, we report that the funds raised on short term basis have not been used during the Financial Year for long term investment.

(xi) To the best of our knowledge and according to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud by the Company and no material fraud on the Company has been noticed or reported during the Financial Year.

For DELOITTE HASKINS & SELLS

Chartered Accountants

(Registration No. 117366W)

K. A. Katki

Mumbai, Partner

August 26, 2011 Membership No. 038568


Jun 30, 2010

1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Gillette India Limited ("the Company"), as at June 30, 2010, the Profit and Loss account and also the Cash Flow Statement of the Company for the year ended on that date, both annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in India. These Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatements. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the Management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 (CARO) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of Section 227 (4A) of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure, a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.

4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in Paragraph 3 above, we report as follows:

a) we have obtained all the information and explanation which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

b) in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the company so far as it appears from our examination of those books;

c) the Balance Sheet, the Profit and Loss Account and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

d) in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, the Profit and Loss Account and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in compliance with the Accounting Standards referred to in Section 211(3C) of the Companies Act, 1956;

e) in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956 in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

(i) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at June 30, 2010;

(ii) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the profit of the Company for the year ended on that date and

(iii) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows of the Company for the year ended on that date.

5. On the basis of written representations received from the Directors as on June 30, 2010 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the Directors is disqualified as on June 30, 2010 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 274(1 )(g) of the Companies Act, 1956.

Annexure to the Auditors Report (Referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date)

(i) Having regard to the nature of the Companys business/ activities/result, clauses vi, x, xi, xii, xiii, xiv, xv, xvi, xviii, xix and xx of CARO are not applicable.

(ii) In respect of its fixed assets:

a. The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of the fixed assets.

b. The fixed assets were physically verified during the year by the management in accordance with a regular programme of verification, which in our opinion provides for physical verification of all the fixed assets at reasonable intervals. According to the information and explanations given to us, no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

c. The fixed assets disposed off during the year, in our opinion, do not constitute a substantial part of the fixed assets of the Company and such disposal has, in our opinion, not affected the going concern status of the Company.

(iii) In respect of its inventory:

a. As explained to us, the inventories were physically verified by the management at reasonable intervals during the year.

b. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management were reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

c. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of its inventories and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.

(iv) The Company has neither granted nor taken any loans, secured or unsecured, to/from companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(v) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, having regard to the explanations that some of the items purchased are of special nature and suitable alternative sources are not readily available for obtaining comparable quotations, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard to purchases of inventory and fixed assets and the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any major weakness in such internal control system.

(vi) According to the information and explanations given to us, there are no contracts or arrangements, the particulars of which needs to be entered in the register maintained in pursuance of Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(vii) In our opinion, the company has an adequate internal audit system commensurate with the size and the nature of its business.

(viii) We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the Company pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under Section 209( 1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 in respect of manufacture of shaving systems, and are of the opinion that prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have, however, not made a detailed examination of the records with a view to determining whether they are accurate or complete. To the best of our knowledge and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost records for any other product of the Company.

(ix) According to the information and explanations given to us in respect of statutory dues:

a. The Company has generally been regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues, including Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees State Insurance, Income-tax, Sales-tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues as applicable to it with the appropriate authorities.

b. There were no undisputed amounts payable in respect of income-tax, wealth-tax, custom duty, excise duty, cess and other material statutory dues in arrears as at June 30, 2010, for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

c. Details of excise duty, service-tax, sales-tax, custom duty and interest charged by Delhi Development Authority on unearned increase which have not been deposited as on June 30, 2010 on account of disputes are given below:

Statute Nature Forum Period to which the Amount of the where amount relates involved dues dispute is (Rs. in pending Lakhs)

The Central Excise Appellate May-1996, Nov.94 - 2477.01 Excise Act, Duty Authorities May 96, July 97 - 1944 July 31 97, Apr. 04- Sept. 04, Sept. - 1995 -Nov- 1995, Apr. 02 - Jan. 03, Dec. 04 - Sept. 07, Apr. 08 - Apr. 09

Tribunal Apr.94 - Sep. 96 12719.20 Nov. 96 - May 98 Sept. 03 - Jan. 08

High Court 1991 8.92

Sub-total 15205.13

Finance Act, Service Appellate 2001-02, Jan.04 - 49.55 1994 Tax- Authorities Dec04,

Apr. 05 to Mar. 06, Apr. 05 to Sep. 05

Sub-total 49.55

Custom Duty Appellate 1996-97, May05 to 1554.60 Authorities Dec. 06

Sub-total 1554.60

Sales Tax Sales Tribunal 1997-98,1999-2000, 45.40 Laws as Tax 2000-2001,2002-2003 per statutes & 2003-2004 applicable in various states

Appellate 1997-1998 to 2009-10 2167.04 Authorities Sub-total 2212.44

Delhi Penal Assistant 29.09.1995 to 394.57 Development Interest Director 31.05.2007 Authority Act 1957

Sub-total 394.57

The above excludes disputed unpaid Excise demands of Rs.2201.83 lakhs and unpaid Service Tax demands of Rs.12 Lakhs raised by the authorities on the third parties with whom the company has business transactions/contractual obligation.

There were no disputed dues remaining unpaid in respect of income tax, wealth tax and cess during the year.

(x) According to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the Company, we report that the funds raised on short term basis have not been used during the year for long term investment.

(xi) To the best of our knowledge and according to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the year.

For DELOITTE HASKINS & SELLS Chartered Accountants

(Registration No. 117366W)

N.P. Sarda Mumbai, Partner

August 18, 2010 Membership No. 9544

Disclaimer: This is 3rd Party content/feed, viewers are requested to use their discretion and conduct proper diligence before investing, GoodReturns does not take any liability on the genuineness and correctness of the information in this article

Get Instant News Updates
Enable
x
Notification Settings X
Time Settings
Done
Clear Notification X
Do you want to clear all the notifications from your inbox?
Settings X