Home  »  Company  »  Hind. Hardy Spic  »  Quotes  »  Auditor Report
Enter the first few characters of Company and click 'Go'

Auditor Report of Hindustan Hardy Spicer Ltd.

Mar 31, 2015

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of HINDUSTAN HARDY SPICER LIMITED, which comprise the Balance Sheet as at March 31,2015, and the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management's Responsibility for the Financial Statements

The Company's Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the Accounting Standards referred to in section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act").This responsibility includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditors' Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Company's preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31, 2015;

b) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the loss for the year ended on that date; and

c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2015 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (1.1) of section 143 of the Act, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.

2. As required by section 143(11)oftheAct,wereportthat:

a) we have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our . knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;

b) in our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books.

c) the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account.

d) in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards referred to in section 133 of the CompaniesAct,2013.

e) on the basis of written representations received from the directors as on March 31, 2015, and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2015, from being appointed as a director in terms of sub-section (2) of section 164 of the Companies Act, 2013.

Annexure referred to in Para 1 of our report on Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements:

1. The nature of Company's activities during the year has been such that following clauses of paragraph 3 of the Companies (Auditors' Report) Order, 2015 are not applicable to the Company: Clauses (iii), (v),(viii), (x), (xii).

2. a) The company is maintaining proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

b) As explained to us, all the assets have not been physically verified by the management during the year but there is a regular programme of verification which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the company and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

3. a) As per the information furnished, the inventory has been physically verified during the year by the management. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is reasonable.

b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the company and the nature of its business.

c) The company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The discrepancies noticed on verification between the physical stocks and the book records were not material.

4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of its business, for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in internal control system.

5. We have broadly reviewed the books of account and records maintained by the Company relating to the manufacture of automotive parts and accessories, pursuant to the rules by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records u/s 148(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 and are of the opinion that prima facie the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have, however, not made a detailed examination of the records with a view to determining whether they are accurate or complete. To the best of our knowledge and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost records u/s 148(1 )of the Companies Act,2013 for any other products of the Company.

6. a) The company is generally regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor education protection fund, employees' state insurance, income tax, value added tax, wealth tax, custom duty, service tax, excise duty, cess and other material statutory dues applicable to it. According to the information and explanations give to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of provident fund, investor education protection fund, employees' state insurance, income tax, value added tax, wealth tax, custom duty, service tax, excise duty, cess and other material statutory dues applicable to were in arrears, as at 31st March 2015, fora period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

b) According to the information and explanation given to us, there are no dues of sale tax, customs duty, wealth tax, excise duty and cess which have not been deposited on account of any dispute, in case of income tax, demand out standing for the following years are disputed before the higher authorities and hence not deposited. The details of which are as under:-

Nature of Amount Period for which Forum where the the dues (Rs Lakhs) the amount relates dispute is pending (Assessment Years)

Income Tax 20.64 lacs 2005-06 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Income Tax 43.81 lacs 2010-11 Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)

Total 64.45 lacs

c) The company has transferred the required amount within time to investor education fund and protection fund in accordance with the relevant provisions of Companies Act,1956(1 of 1956) and rules made thereunder.

7. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to a financial institution or bank In our opinion, the term loans have been applied for the purpose for which they were raised.

8. In our opinion, the term loans have been applied for the purpose for which they were raised.

For J.L.BHATT& COMPANY Chartered Accountants Firm Reg. No: 101332W

YOGESH J. BHATT Partner Membership No. 30170 Mumbai, 5th May 2015




Mar 31, 2014

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Hindustan Hardy Spicer Limited, which comprise the Balance Sheet as at March 31, 2014, and the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

The Company''s Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act"). This responsibility includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditors'' Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan andperform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Company''s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31, 2014;

b) in the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss Account, of the profit for the year ended on that date; and

c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 ("theOrder") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Act, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.

2. As required by section 227(3) of the Act, we report that:

a) we have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;

b) in our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books

c) the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account.

d) in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards referred to in subsection (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956;

e) on the basis of written representations received from the directors as on March 31, 2014, and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2014, from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.

ANNEXURE TO AUDITORS REPORT (Referred to in paragraph 1 of our report of even date)

The nature of the Company''s business / activities during the year is such that clauses (vi), (x), (xiii) and (xiv) of paragraph 4 of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.

(i) In respect of its fixed assets :

a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

b) Some of the fixed assets were physically verified during the year by the Management in accordance with a programme of verification, which in our opinion provides for physical verification of all the fixed assets at reasonable intervals. According to the information and explanations given to us no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

c) During the year the Company has not disposed off any substantial part of its fixed assets. Therefore, it has not affected the going concern assumption of the Company.

(ii) In respect of its inventories:

a) As explained to us, inventories were physically verified during the year by the Management at reasonable intervals.

b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management were reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of its inventories and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.

iii) a) According to the information and explanations given to us, during the year the Company has not granted unsecured loans to any party covered in the register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act 1956.

Accordingly sub-clauses (b) to (d) are not applicable.

b) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not taken loans, secured or unsecured, from companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act 1956

Accordingly sub-clauses (f) and (g) are not applicable.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services and we have not observed any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in such internal control system.

(v) In respect of contracts or arrangements entered in the register maintained in pursuance of section 301 of the Companies Act 1956, to the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information and explanations given to us,

a) The particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to in Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been entered in the register required to be maintained under that Section.

b) Excluding certain transactions of purchase of goods of special nature for which alternate quotations are not available, where each of such transactions is in excess of Rs. 5 lakhs in respect any party, the transactions have been made at price which are prima facie reasonable having regard to the prevailing market price at the relevant time.

(vi) In our opinion, the internal audit functions carried out during the year by a firm of Chartered Accountants appointed by the Management have been commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

(vii) We have broadly reviewed the books of account and records maintained by the Company relating to the manufacture of automotive parts and accessories, pursuant to the rules by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records u/s 209(1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 and are of the opinion that prima facie the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have, however, not made a detailed examination of the records with a view to determining whether they are accurate or complete. To the best of our knowledge and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Central Government has prescribed the maintenance of cost records u/s 209(1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956.

(viii) In respect of statutory dues;

a) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has been generally regular in deposition undisputed Statutory dues, including Provident Funds, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise duty, Cess and any other material statutory dues with the appropriate authorities. There are no arrears at the year end.

b) According to the information and explanations given to us, details of disputed statutory dues pertaining to income tax, sales tax, wealth tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty, octroi and cess which have not been deposited as on 31st March 2014 on account of any dispute are given below :

Nature of the dues Amount Period for which Forum where the (Rs Lakhs) the amount relates dispute is pending (Assessment Years)

Income Tax 20.64 2005-06 CIT (A)

Income Tax 43.81 2010-11 CIT (A)

Total 64.45

(ix) In our opinion and according to the information given to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to banks.

(x) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

(xi) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not given any guarantees for loans taken by others from banks and financial institutions and thus the questions of whether the terms and conditions are prima facie prejudicial to interest of company does not arise.

(xii) In our opinion and according to the information given to us, the term loan raised by the Company has been applied for the purpose for which the loan was obtained.

(xiii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, and on an overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, funds raised on short term basis have prima facie, not been used during the year for long term investment.

(xiv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties and companies covered in the Register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act, 1956, during the year and hence the question of whether the price at which shares have been issued is prejudicial to interest of company does not arise.

(xv) To the best of our knowledge and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not issued any debentures and hence the question of whether security has been created for debentures issued does not arise.

(xvi) As informed to us, the Company has not raised monies by public issues during the year and hence the question of disclosure and verification of end use of such monies does not arise.

(xvii) To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the Company was noticed or reported during the year.

For J. L. BHATT & COMPANY

Chartered Accountants Firm Reg. No: 101332W

YOGESH J. BHATT

Partner

Membership No. 30170

Mumbai, 19th May 2014


Mar 31, 2013

We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Hindustan Hardy Spicer Limited as at 31st March, 2013, and also the Profit and Loss Account and the Cash Flow Statement of the Company for the year ended on that date both annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company''s Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for ouropinion.

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 issued by the Central Government of India in terms of Section 227 (4A) of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 & 5 of the said Order.

2. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 1 above, we report that:

a. we have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;

b. in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books;

c. the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

d. in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in compliance with the Accounting Standards referred to in Section 211 (3C) of the Companies Act, 1956;

e. On the basis of written representations received from the directors and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the directors from whom such representations have been received is disqualified as on March 31, 2013 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956; and

f. in our opinion and to the best of our information and according.to explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

i) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31 st March, 2013;

ii) in the case of the Profit & Loss Account, of the profit of the Company for the year ended on that date; and

iii) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

ANNEXURE TO AUDITORS REPORT

(Referred to in paragraph 1 of our report of even date)

The nature of the Company''s business / activities during the year is such that clauses (vi), (x), (xiii) and (xiv) of paragraph 4 of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.

(i) In respect of its fixed assets:

a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

b) Some of the fixed assets were physically verified during the year by the Management in accordance with a programme of verification, which in our opinion provides for physical verification of all the fixed assets at reasonable intervals. According to the information and explanations given to us no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

c) During the year the Company has not disposed off any substantial part of its fixed assets. Therefore, it has not affected the going concern assumption of the Company.

(ii) In respect of its inventories:

a) As explained to us, inventories were physically verified during the year by the Management at reasonable intervals.

b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management were reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of its inventories and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.

iii) a) According to the information and explanations given to us, during the yearthe Company has not granted unsecured loans to any party covered in the register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act 1956.

Accordingly sub-clauses (b) to (d) are not applicable.

b) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not taken loans, secured or unsecured, from companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act 1956

Accordingly sub-clauses (f) and (g) are not applicable.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services and we have not observed any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in such internal control system.

(v) In respect of contracts or arrangements entered in the register maintained in pursuance of section 301 of the Companies Act 1956, to the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information and explanations given to us,

a) The particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to in Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been entered in the register required to be maintained under that Section.

b) Excluding certain transactions of purchase of goods of special nature for which alternate quotations are not available, where each of such transactions is in excess of Rs. 5 lakhs in respect any party, the transactions have been made at price which are prima facie reasonable having regard to the prevailing market price at the relevant time.

(vi) In our opinion, the internal audit functions carried out during the year by a firm of Chartered Accountants appointed by the Management have been commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

(vii) We have broadly reviewed the books of account and records maintained by the Company relating to the manufacture of automotive parts and accessories, pursuant to the rules by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records u/s 209(1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 and are of the opinion that prima facie the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have, however, not made a detailed examination of the records with a view to determining whether they are accurate or complete. To the best of our knowledge and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost records u/s 209(1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 for any other products of the Company.

(viii) In respect of statutory dues;

a) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has been generally regular in deposition undisputed Statutory dues, including Provident Funds, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise duty, Cess and any other material statutory dues with the appropriate authorities. There are no arrears at the year end.

b) According to the information and explanations given to us, there are no disputed statutory dues pertaining to income tax, sales tax, wealth tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty, octroi and cess which have not been deposited as on 31 st March 2013

(ix) In our opinion and according to the information given to us, the Company has not defaulted in Repayment of dues to banks.

(x) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

(xi) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not given any guarantees for loans taken by others from banks and financial institutions and thus the questions of whether the terms and conditions are prima facie prejudicial to interest of company does not arise.

(xii) In our opinion and according to the information given to us, the term loan raised by the Company has been applied for the purpose for which the loan was obtained.

(xiii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, and on an overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, funds raised on short term basis have prima facie, not been used during the year for long term investment.

(xiv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties and companies covered in the Register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act, 1956, during the year and hence the question of whether the price at which shares have been issued is prejudicial to interest of company does not arise.

(xv) To the best of our knowledge and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not issued any debentures and hence the question of whether security has been created for debentures issued does notarise.

(xvi) As informed to us, the Company has not raised monies by public issues during the year and hence the question of disclosure and verification of end use of such monies does not arise.

(xvii) To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the Company was noticed or reported during the year.

For J. L. BHATT & COMPANY

Chartered Accountants

Firm Reg. No: 101332W

YOGESH J. BHATT

Partner

Membership No. 30170

Mumbai, 06th May 2013


Mar 31, 2012

We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Hindustan Hardy Spicer Limited as at 31st March, 2012, and also the Profit and Loss Account and the Cash Flow Statement of the Company for the year ended on that date both annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 issued by the Central Government of India in terms of Section 227 (4A) of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 & 5 of the said Order.

2. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 1 above, we report that:

a. we have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;

b. in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books;

c. the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

d. in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in compliance with the Accounting Standards referred to in Section 211(3C) of the Companies Act, 1956;

e. On the basis of written representations received from the directors and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the directors from whom such representations have been received is disqualified as on March 31, 2012 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956; and

f. in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

i) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31st March, 2012;

ii) in the case of the Profit & Loss Account, of the profit of the Company for the year ended on that date; and

iii) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

ANNEXURE TO AUDITORS REPORT (Referred to in paragraph 1 of our report of even date)

The nature of the Company's business / activities during the year is such that clauses (vi), (x), (xiii) and (xiv) of paragraph 4 of the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.

(i) In respect of its fixed assets :

a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

b) Some of the fixed assets were physically verified during the year by the Management in accordance with a programme of verification, which in our opinion provides for physical verification of all the fixed assets at reasonable intervals. According to the information and explanations given to us no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

c) During the year the Company has not disposed off any substantial part of its fixed assets. Therefore, it has not affected the going concern assumption of the Company.

(ii) In respect of its inventories:

a) As explained to us, inventories were physically verified during the year by the Management at reasonable intervals.

b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management were reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of its inventories and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.

iii) a) According to the information and explanations given to us, during the year the Company has not granted unsecured loans to any party covered in the register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act 1956.

Accordingly sub-clauses (b) to (d) are not applicable.

b) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not taken loans, secured or unsecured, from companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act 1956

Accordingly sub-clauses (f) and (g) are not applicable.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services and we have not observed any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in such internal control system.

(v) In respect of contracts or arrangements entered in the register maintained in pursuance of section 301 of the Companies Act 1956, to the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information and explanations given to us,

a) The particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to in Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been entered in the register required to be maintained under that Section.

b) Excluding certain transactions of purchase of goods of special nature for which alternate quotations are not available, where each of such transactions is in excess of Rs. 5 lakhs in respect of any party, the transactions have been made at price which are prima facie reasonable having regard to the prevailing market price at the relevant time.

(vi) In our opinion, the internal audit functions carried out during the year by a firm of Chartered Accountants appointed by the Management have been commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

(vii) We have broadly reviewed the books of account and records maintained by the Company relating to the manufacture of automotive parts and accessories, pursuant to the rules by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records u/s 209(1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 and are of the opinion that prima facie the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have, however, not made a detailed examination of the records with a view to determining whether they are accurate or complete. To the best of our knowledge and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost records u/s 209(1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 for any other products of the Company.

(viii) In respect of Statutory dues;

a) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has been generally regular in deposition undisputed Statutory dues, including Provident Funds, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees' State Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise duty, Cess and any other material statutory dues with the appropriate authorities. There are no arrears at the year end.

b) According to the information and explanations given to us, there are no disputed statutory dues pertaining to income tax, sales tax, wealth tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty, octroi and cess which have not been deposited as on 31st March 2012

(ix) In our opinion and according to the information given to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to banks.

(x) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

(xi) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not given any guarantees for loans taken by others from banks and financial institutions and thus the questions of whether the terms and conditions are prima facie prejudicial to interest of company does not arise.

(xii) In our opinion and according to the information given to us, the term loan raised by the Company has been applied for the purpose for which the loan was obtained.

(xiii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, and on an overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, funds raised on short term basis have prima facie, not been used during the year for long term investment.

(xiv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties and companies covered in the Register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act, 1956, during the year and hence the question of whether the price at which shares have been issued is prejudicial to interest of company does not arise.

(xv) To the best of our knowledge and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not issued any debentures and hence the question of whether security has been created for debentures issued does not arise.

(xvi) As informed to us, the Company has not raised monies by public issues during the year and hence the question of disclosure and verification of end use of such monies does not arise.

(xvii) To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information and explanations given us, no fraud on or by the Company was noticed or reported during the year.

For J. L. BHATT & COMPANY Chartered Accountants Firm Reg. No: 101332W



YOGESH J. BHATT Partner Membership No. 30170

Mumbai, 16th April 2012


Mar 31, 2011

We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Hindustan Hardy Spicer Limited as at 31st March, 2011, and also the Profit and Loss Account and the Cash Flow Statement of the Company for the year ended on that date both annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial state- ments based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

1. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 issued by the Central Government of India in terms of Section 227 (4A) of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 & 5 of the said Order.

2. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 1 above, we report that:

a. we have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;

b. in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books;

c. the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

d. in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in compliance with the Accounting Standards referred to in Section 211(3C) of the Companies Act, 1956;

e. On the basis of written representations received from the directors and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the directors from whom such representations have been received is disqualified as on March 31,2011 from being appointed asa director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956; and

f. in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

i) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31st March, 2011;

ii) in the case of the Profit & Loss Account, of the profit of the Company for the year ended on that date; and

iii) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

ANNEXURE TO AUDITORS REPORT (Referred to in paragraph 1 of our report of even date)

The nature of the Companys business / activities during the year is such that clauses (vi), (x), (xiii) and (xiv) of paragraph 4 of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.

(i) In respect of its fixed assets :

a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

b) Some of the fixed assets were physically verified during the year by the Management in accordance with a programme of verification, which in our opinion provides for physical verification of all the fixed assets at reasonable intervals. According to the information and explanations given to us no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

c) During the year the Company has not disposed off any substantial part of its fixed assets. Therefore, ithas not affected the going concern assumption of the Company.

(ii) In respect of its inventories:

a) As explained to us, inventories were physically verified during the year by the Management at reasonable intervals.

b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management were reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of its inventories and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.

iii) a) According to the information and explanations given to us, during the year the Company has not granted unsecured loans to any party covered in the register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act 1956.

Accordingly sub-clauses (b) to (d) are not applicable.

b) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not taken loans, secured or unsecured, from companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act 1956

Accordingly sub-clauses (f) and (g) are not applicable.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services and we have not observed any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in such internal control system.

(v) In respect of contracts or arrangements entered in the register maintained in pursuance of section 301 of the Companies Act 1956, to the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information and explanations given to us,

a) the particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to in Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been entered in the register required to be maintained under that Section.

b) Excluding certain transactions of purchase of goods of special nature for which alternate quotations are not available, where each of such transactions is in excess of Rs. 5 lakhs in respect of any party, the transactions have been made at price which are prima facie reasonable having regard to the prevailing market price at the relevant time.

(vi) In our opinion, the internal audit functions carried out during the year by a firm of Chartered Accountants appointed by the Management have been commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

(vii) We have broadly reviewed the books of account and records maintained by the Company relating to the manufacture of automotive parts and accessories, pursuant to the rules by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records u/s 209(1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 and are of the opinion that prima facie the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have, however, not made a detailed examination of the records with a view to determining whether they are accurate or complete. To the best of our knowledge and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost records u/s 209(1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 for any other products of the Company.

(viii) In respect of Statutory dues;

a) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has been generally regular in deposition undisputed Statutory dues, including Provident Funds, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees State Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise duty, Cess and any other material statutory dues with the appropriate authorities. There are no arrears at the year end.

b) According to the information and explanations given to us, details of disputed statutory dues pertaining to income tax, sales tax, wealth tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty, octroi and cess which have not been deposited as on 31st March 2011 on account of any dispute are given below:

Nature of Amount Period for which Forum where the

the dues (Rs. Lacs) the amount relates dispute is pending

(Assessment Years) Income Tax 12.69** 2005-06 Income Tax

Appellate Tribunal

Total 12.69

** Subject to reduction as order giving effect to Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is awaited.

(ix) In our opinion and according to the information given to us, the Company has not defaulted in

(x) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

(xi) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not given any guarantees for loans taken by others from banks and financial institutions and thus the question of whether the terms and conditions are prima facie prejudicial to interest of company does not arise.

(xii) In our opinion and according to the information given to us, the term loan raised by the Company has been applied for the purpose for which the loan was obtained.

(xiii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, and on an overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, funds raised on short term basis have prima facie, not been used during the year for long term investment.

(xiv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties and companies covered in the Register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act, 1956, during the year and hence the question of whether the price at which shares have been issued is prejudicial to interest of company does not arise.

(xv) To the best of our knowledge and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not issued any debentures and hence the question of whether security has been created for debentures issued does not arise.

(xvi) As informed to us, the Company has not raised monies by public issues during the year and hence the question of disclosure and verification of end use of such monies does not arise.

(xvii) To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the Company was noticed or reported during the year.

For J. L. BHATT & COMPANY

Chartered Accountants

FirmReg.No:101332W

YOGESH J. BHATT

Partner

Membership No. 30170

Mumbai, 23.05.2011.


Mar 31, 2010

We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Hindustan Hardy Spicer Limited as at 31st March, 2010, and also the Profit and Loss Account and the Cash Flow Statement of the Company for the year ended on that date both annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial state- ments based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those standards-require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial Statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

1. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 issued by the Central Government of India in terms of Section 227 (4A) of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 & 5 of the said Order.

2. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 1 above, we report that:

a. we have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;

b. in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books;

c. the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

d. in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in compliance with the Accounting Standards referred to in Section 211 (3C) of the Companies Act, 1956;

e. On the basis of written representations received from the directors and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the directors from whom such representations have been received is disqualified ason March 31,2010 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956; and

f. Attention is invited to Note No. 4(H) of Schedule 18 regarding pending approval of the Central Government in respect of the remuneration paid to chairman exceeding the limits prescribed under the Companies Act 1956.

g. in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to explanations given to us, the said accounts subject to paragraph (f) above give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

i) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31st March, 2010;

ii) in the case of the Profit & Loss Account, of the profit of the Company for the year ended on that date; and

iii) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

ANNEXURE TO AUDITORSREPORT

(Referred to in paragraph 1 of our report of even date)

The nature of the Companys business / activities during the year is such that clauses (vi), (x), (xiii) and (xiv) of paragraph 4 of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.

(i) In respect of its fixed assets :

a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

b) Some of the fixed assets were physically verified during the year by the Management in accordance with a programme of verification, which in our opinion provides for physical verification of all the fixed assets at reasonable intervals. According to the information and explanations given to us no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

c) During the year the Company has not disposed off any substantial part of its fixed assets. Therefore, it has not affected the going concern assumption of the Company.

(ii) In respect of its inventories:

a) As explained to us, inventories were physically verified during the year by the Management at reasonable intervals.

b) in our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management were reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

c) in our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of its inventories and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.

iii) a) According to the information and explanations given to us, during the year the Company has not granted unsecured loans to any party covered in the register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act 1956.

Accordingly sub-clauses (b) to (d) are not applicable.

b) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not taken loans, secured or unsecured, from companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act 1956

Accordingly sub-clauses (f) and (g) are not applicable.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services and we have not observed any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in such internal control system.

(v) In respect of contracts or arrangements entered in the register maintained in pursuance of section 301 of the Companies Act 1956, to the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information and explanations given to us,

a) the particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to in Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been entered in the register required to be maintained under that Section.

b) Excluding certain transactions of purchase of goods of special nature for which alternate quotations are not available, where each of such transactions is in excess of Rs. 5 lakhs in respect of any party, the transactions have been made at price which are prima facie reasonable having regard to the prevailing market price at the relevant time.

(vi) In our opinion, the internal audit functions carried out during the year by a Accountants appointed by the Management have been commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

(vii) We have broadly reviewed the books of account and records maintained by the Company relating to the manufacture of automotive parts and accessories, pursuant to the rules by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records u/s 209(1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 and are of the opinion that prima facie the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have, however, not made a detailed examination of the records with a view to determining whether they are accurate or complete. To the best of our knowledge and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost records u/s 209(1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 for any other products of the Company.

(viii) In respect of Statutory dues;

a) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has been generally regular in deposition undisputed Statutory dues, including Provident Funds, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees State Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise duty, Cess and any other material statutory dues with the appropriate authorities. There are no arrears at the year end.

b) According to the information and explanations given to us, details of disputed statutory dues pertaining to income tax, sales tax, wealth tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty, octroi and cess which have not been deposited as on 31 st March 2010 on account of any dispute are given below:

Nature of Amount Period for which Forum where the the dues (Rs. Lacs) the amount relates dispute is pending (Assessment Years)

Penalty under 0.66 2004-05 Commissioner of Income Tax Act Income Tax (Appeals)

IncomeTax 12.69** 2005-06 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Total 13.35

** Subject to reduction as order giving effect to Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is awaited.

(ix) In our opinion and according to the information given to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to banks.

(x) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

(xi) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not given any guarantees for loans taken by others from banks and financial institutions and thus the question of whether the terms and conditions are prima facie prejudicial to interest of company does not arise.

(xii) In our opinion and according to the information given to us, the term loan raised by the Company has been applied for the purpose for which the loan was obtained.

(xiii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, and on an overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, funds raised on short term basis have prima facie, not been used during the year for long term investment.

(xiv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties and companies covered in the Register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act, 1956, during the year and hence the question of whether the price at which shares have been issued is prejudicial to interest of company does not arise.

(xv) To the best of our knowledge and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not issued any debentures and hence the question of whether security has been created for debentures issued does not arise.

(xvi) As informed to us, the Company has not raised monies by public issues during the year and hence the question of disclosure and verification of end use of such monies does not arise.

(xvii) To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information and explanations given us, no fraud on or by the Company was noticed or reported during the year.

For J. L. BHATT & COMPANY

Chartered Accountants

YOGESH J.BHATT

Partner Mumbai, 23.04. 2010. Membership No. 30170

 
Subscribe now to get personal finance updates in your inbox!