Home  »  Company  »  KDDL Ltd.  »  Quotes  »  Auditor Report
Enter the first few characters of Company and click 'Go'

Auditor Report of KDDL Ltd.

Mar 31, 2017

To the Members of KDDL Limited

Report on the Standalone Financial Statements

1. We have audited the accompanying standalone financial statements of KDDL Limited (''the Company''), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 31 March 2017, the Statement of Profit and Loss and the Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management''s Responsibility for the Standalone Financial Statements

2. The Company''s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 (''the Act'') with respect to the preparation of these standalone financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards prescribed under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014 (as amended). This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the standalone financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor''s Responsibility

3. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these standalone financial statements based on our audit.

4. We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made there under.

5. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonableassuranceaboutwhetherthesestandalonefinancialstatementsare free from material misstatement.

6. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial controls relevant to the Company''s preparation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Company''s Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

7. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on these standalone financial statements.

Opinion

8. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid standalone financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31 March 2017, and its profit and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

9. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2016 (''the Order'') issued by the Central Government of India in terms of Section 143(11) of the Act, we give in the Annexure I a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.

10. Further to our comments in Annexure I, as required by Section 143(3) of the Act, we report that:

a. we have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;

b. in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books;

c. the standalone financial statements dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

d. in our opinion, the aforesaid standalone financial statements comply with the Accounting Standards prescribed under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014 (as amended);

e. on the basis of the written representations received from the directors and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31 March 2017 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164(2) of the Act;

f. we have also audited the internal financial controls over financial reporting (IFCoFR) of the Company as on 31 March 2017 in conjunction with our audit of the standalone financial statements of the Company for the year ended on that date and our report dated 30 May 2017 as per Annexure II expresses unqualified opinion;

g. with respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor''s Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014 (as amended), in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i. the Company, as detailed in Note 32 (c) to 32 (f) to the standalone financial statements, has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position;

ii. the Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses;

iii. there has been no delay in transferring amounts, required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund bythe Company; and

iv. the company, as detailed in Note 45 to the standalone financial statements, has made requisite disclosures in these standalone financial statements as to holdings as well as dealings in Specified Bank Notes during the period from 8 November 2016 to 30 December 2016. Based on the audit procedures performed and taking into consideration the information and explanations given to us, in our opinion, these are in accordance with the books of account maintained by the company.

Annexure I

Based on the audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting a true and fair view on the financial statements of the Company and taking into consideration the information and explanations given to us and the books of account and other records examined by us in the normal course of audit, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, we report that:

(I) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) The Company has a regular program of physical verification of its fixed assets under which fixed assets are verified in a phased manner over a period of three years, which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. In accordance with this program, certain fixed assets were verified during the year and no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

(c) The title deeds of all the immovable properties (which are included under the head ''fixed assets'') are held in the name of the Company except for the following piece of land situated at Parwanoo which was transferred to the Company, as a result of amalgamation of Himachal Fine Blanks Limited, erstwhile wholly owned subsidiary of the company.

Nature of property

Total Number of Cases

Whether leasehold /freehold

Gross block as on 31 March 2017 (Rs.)

Net block on 31 March 2016 (Rs.)

Remarks

Land

1

Freehold

566,913

566,913

The management is completing formalities for transferring the title deeds.

(ii) In our opinion, the management has conducted physical verification of inventory at reasonable intervals during the year, except for goods-in-transit and stocks lying with third parties. For stocks lying with third parties at the year-end, written confirmations have been obtained by the management. No material discrepancies were noticed on the aforesaid verification.

(iii) The Company has granted secured loan to a company covered in the register maintained under Section 189 of the Act; and with respect to the same:

(a) in our opinion the terms and conditions of grant of such loans are not, prima facie, prejudicial to the company''s interest.

(b) the schedule of repayment of principal and payment of interest has been stipulated in the contract. The repayment of the principal amount and payment of interest did not fall due during the year covered by our audit.

(c) there is no overdue amount in respect of loans granted to such company.

(iv) In our opinion, the Company has complied with the provisions of Sections 185 and 186 of the Act in respect of loans, investments, guarantees and security.

(v) In our opinion, the Company has complied with the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India, the provisions of Sections 73 to 76 and other relevant provisions of the Act and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014 (as amended) as applicable, with regard to the deposits accepted. According to the information and explanations given to us, no order has been passed by the Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any Court or any other Tribunal, in this regard.

(vi) We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the Company pursuant to the Rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under sub-section (1) of Section 148 of the Act in respect of Company''s products and are of the opinion that, prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. However, we have not made a detailed examination of the cost records with a view to determine whether they are accurate or complete.

(vii) (a) Undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, employees'' state insurance, income-tax, sales-

tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value added tax, cess and other material statutory dues, as applicable, have generally been regularly deposited to the appropriate authorities, though there has been a slight delay in a few cases. Further, no undisputed amounts payable in respect thereof were outstanding at the year-end for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(b) The dues outstanding in respect of income-tax, sales-tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise and value added tax on account of any dispute, are as follows:

Statement of Disputed Dues

Name of statute

Nature of dues

Amount

(Rs)

Amount paid under protest (Rs.)

Period to which the amount relates

Forum where dispute is pending

Finance Act, 1994

Service tax

3,230,574

-

June 2009 September 2013

Commissioner (Appeals)

Finance Act, 1994

Service tax

623,422

October 2013 August 2014

Commissioner (Appeals)

Finance Act, 1994

Service tax

491,593

-

September 2014 June 2015

Commissioner (Appeals)

Finance Act, 1994

Service tax

448,946

-

July 2015 June 2016

Commissioner (Appeals)

Income tax Act, 1961

Income tax

4,046,108

4,046,108

FY 2003-04

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New-Delhi

Income tax Act, 1961

Income tax

13,203,431

FY 2004-05

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New-Delhi

Income tax Act, 1961

Income tax

10,625,400

9,815,807

FY 2005-06

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New-Delhi

Income tax Act, 1961

Income tax

1,964,000

1,964,000

FY 2010-11

Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), New- Delhi

Income tax Act, 1961

Income tax

6,948,302

-

FY 2011-12

Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), New- Delhi

# amounts as per demand order including interest and penalty, whichever indicated in the order

(viii) The Company has not defaulted in repayment of loans or borrowings to any bank or financial institution or government during the year. The Company did not have any outstanding debentures during the year.

(ix) In our opinion, the Company has applied moneys raised by way of the term loans for the purposes for which these were raised. The Company did not raise moneys by way of initial public offer/ further public offer (including debt instruments) during the year.

(x) No fraud by the Company or on the company by its officers or employees has been noticed or reported during the period covered by our audit.

(xi) Managerial remuneration has been paid and provided by the company in accordance with the requisite approvals mandated by the provisions of Section 197 of the Act read with Schedule V to the Act.

(xii) In our opinion, the Company is not a Nidhi Company. Accordingly, provisions of clause 3(xii) of the Order are not applicable.

(xiii) In our opinion all transactions with the related parties are in compliance with Sections 177 and 188 of Act, where applicable, and the requisite details have been disclosed in the financial statements etc., as required by the applicable accounting standards.

(xiv) During the year, the company has made private placement of shares. In respect of the same, in our opinion, the company has complied with the requirement of Section 42 of the Act and the Rules framed there under. Further, in our opinion, the amounts so raised have been used for the purposes for which the funds were raised. During the year, the company did not make preferential allotment of shares/ fully or partly convertible debentures.

(xv) In our opinion, the Company has not entered into any non-cash transactions with the directors or persons connected with them covered under Section 192 of the Act.

(xvi) The Company is not required to be registered under Section 45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934.

Annexure II Independent Auditor''s report on the Internal Financial Controls under Clause (I) of Sub-section 3 of Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 (the ''Act'')

1. In conjunction with our audit of the financial statements of KDDL Limited (the ''Company'') as of and for the year ended 31 March 2017, we have audited the internal financial controls over financial reporting (IFCoFR) of the Company of as of that date.

Management''s Responsibility for Internal Financial Controls

2. The Company''s Board of Directors is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal financial controls based on the IFCoFR criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal financial controls stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting (the ''Guidance Note'') issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (''ICAI''). These responsibilities include the design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls that were operating effectively for ensuring the orderly and efficient conduct of the Company''s business, including adherence to Company''s policies, the safeguarding of its assets, the prevention and detection of frauds and errors, the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, and the timely preparation of reliable financial information, as required under the Act.

Auditors'' Responsibility

3. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company''s IFCoFR based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing (''Standards''), issued by the ICAI and deemed to be prescribed under section 143(10) of the Act, to the extent applicable to an audit of IFCoFR, and the Guidance Note issued by the ICAI. Those Standards and the Guidance Note require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether adequate IFCoFR were established and maintained and if such controls operated effectively in all material respects.

4. Our audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the adequacy of the IFCoFR and their operating effectiveness. Our audit of IFCoFR included obtaining an understanding of IFCoFR, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error.

5. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the Company''s IFCoFR.

Meaning of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting

6. A Company''s IFCoFR is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A Company''s IFCoFR includes those policies and procedures that

(1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company''s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Inherent Limitations of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting

7. Because of the inherent limitations of IFCoFR, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of the IFCoFR to future periods are subject to the risk that IFCoFR may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Opinion

8. In our opinion, the Company has, in all material respects, adequate internal financial controls over financial reporting and such internal financial controls over financial reporting were operating effectively as at 31 March 2017, based on the IFCoFR criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal financial controls stated in the Guidance Note issued by the ICAI.

For Walker Chandiok & Co LLP

(formerly Walker, Chandiok & Co)

Chartered Accountants

Firm''s Registration No.: 001076N/N500013

per Lalit Kumar

Partner

Membership No.: 095256

Place: Chandigarh

Date: 30 May 2017


Mar 31, 2016

Independent Auditor''s Report

To the Members of KDDL Limited

Report on the Standalone Financial Statements

1. We have audited the accompanying standalone financial statements of KDDL Limited ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance sheet as at 31 March 2016, the Statement of Profit and loss, the Cash flow statement for the year then ended, and a summary of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management''s Responsibility for the Standalone Financial Statements

2. The Company''s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act") with respect to the preparation of these standalone financial statements, that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies(Accounts) Rules, 2014 (as amended). This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act; safeguarding the assets of the Company; preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor''s Responsibility

3. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these standalone financial statements based on our audit.

4. We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made there under.

5. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the standalone financial statements are free from material misstatement.

6. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial controls relevant to the Company''s preparation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Company''s directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

7. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the standalone financial statements.

Opinion

8. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid standalone financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31 March 2016, and its profit and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

9. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2016 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of Section 143(11) of the Act, we give in the Annexure-I a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.

10. Further to our comments in Annexure I, as required by Section143(3) of the Act, we report that:

a. we have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;

b. in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books;

c. the standalone financial statements dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

d. in our opinion, the aforesaid standalone financial statements comply with the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014 (as amended);

e. on the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on 31 March 2016 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31 March 2016 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section164(2) of the Act;

f. we have also audited the internal financial controls over financial reporting (IFCoFR) of the Company as of 31 March 2016 in conjunction with our audit of the standalone financial statements of the Company for the year ended on that date and our report dated 30 May 2016 as per Annexure II expressed unqualified opinion; and

g. with respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor''s Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i. as detailed in Note 32(d) to 32(f) to the standalone financial statements, the Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its standalone financial position;

ii. the Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses; and

iii. there has been no delay in transferring amounts, required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.

For Walker Chandiok & Co LLP

(Formerly Walker, Chandiok & Co)

Chartered Accountants

Firm''s Registration No.: 001076N/N500013

per Lalit Kumar

Partner

Membership No.: 095256 Place: Chandigarh Date: 30 May, 2016

Annexure I to the Independent Auditor''s Report of even date to the members of KDDL Limited on the financial statements for the year ended 31 March, 2016

Annexure I

Based on the audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting a true and fair view on the financial statements of the Company and taking into consideration the information and explanations given to us and the books of account and other records examined by us in the normal course of audit, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, we report that:

i. (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) The Company has a regular program of physical verification of its fixed assets under which fixed assets are verified in a phased manner over a period of -three years, which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. In accordance with this program, certain fixed assets were verified during the year and no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

(c) The title deeds of all the immovable properties (which are included under the head ''fixed assets'') are held in the name of the Company except for the following piece of land situated at Parwanoo which was transferred to the Company, as a result of amalgamation of Himachal Fine Blanks Limited, erstwhile wholly owned subsidiary of the company:

Nature of property

Total Number of Cases

Whether leasehold / freehold

Gross block as on 31 March 2016 (Rs.)

Net block on 31 March 2016 (Rs.)

Remarks

Land

1

Freehold

566,913

566,913

The management is completing formalities for transferring the title deeds.

ii. In our opinion, the management has conducted physical verification of inventory at reasonable intervals during the year, except for goods-in-transit and stocks lying with third parties. For stocks lying with third parties at the year-end, written confirmations have been obtained by the management. No material discrepancies were noticed on the aforesaid verification.

iii. The Company has granted secured loan to a company covered in the register maintained under Section 189 of the Act; and with respect to the same:

(a) in our opinion the terms and conditions of grant of such loans are not, prima facie, prejudicial to the company''s interest.

(b) the schedule of repayment of principal and payment of interest has been stipulated in the contract. The repayment of the principal amount and payment of interest did not fall due during the year covered by our audit;

(c) there is no overdue amount in respect of loans granted to such company.

iv. In our opinion, company has complied with the provisions of Sections 185 and 186 of the Act in respect of loans, investments, guarantees, and security.

v. In our opinion, the Company has complied with the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India, the provisions of Sections 73to 76 and other relevant provisions of the Act and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014 (as amended) as applicable, with regard to the deposits accepted. According to the information and explanations given to us, no order has been passed by the Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any Court or any other Tribunal, in this regard.

vi. We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the Company pursuant to the Rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under sub-section (1) of Section 148 of the Act in respect of Company''s products and are of the opinion that, prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. However, we have not made a detailed examination of the cost records with a view to determine whether they are accurate or complete.

vii. (a) Undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, employees'' state insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value added tax, cess and other material statutory dues, as applicable, have generally been regularly deposited to the appropriate authorities, though there has been a slight delay in a few cases. Further, no undisputed amounts payable in respect thereof were outstanding at the year-end for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(b) The dues outstanding in respect of income-tax, sales-tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise and value added tax on account of any dispute, are as follows:

Statement of Disputed Dues

Name of the statute

Nature of dues

Amount (Rs.)

Amount paid under Protest (Rs.)

Period to which the amount relates

Forum where dispute is pending

Finance Act, 1994

Service

tax

219,309

-

July 2004-March 2005

Custom Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi

Finance Act, 1994

Service

tax

1,615,287

-

June 2009-September 2013

Commissioner (Appeals)

Income-tax Act, 1961

Income

tax

4,046,108

4,046,108

FY 2003-04

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi

Income-tax Act, 1961

Income-

tax

13,203,431

-

FY 2004-05

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi

Income-tax Act, 1961

Income-

tax

10,625,400

10,625,400

FY 2005-06

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi

Income-tax Act, 1961

Income-

tax

13,437,820

5,606,407

FY 2006-07

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi

Income-tax Act, 1961

Income-

tax

11,683,230

7,473,770

FY 2007-08

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi

Income-tax Act, 1961

Income-

tax

9,393,730

5,014,427

FY 2008-09

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi

Income-tax Act, 1961

Income-

tax

28,567,250

FY 2010-11

Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), New Delhi

viii. The Company has not defaulted in repayment of loans or borrowings to any bank or financial institution or government during the year. The Company did not have any outstanding debentures during the year.

ix. In our opinion, the Company has applied moneys raised by the term loans for the purposes for which these were raised. The Company did not raise moneys by way of initial public offer/ further public offer (including debt instruments).

x. No fraud by the Company or on the company by its officers or employees has been noticed or reported during the period covered by our audit.

xi. Managerial remuneration has been paid and provided by the company in accordance with the requisite approvals mandated by the provisions of Section 197 of the Act read with Schedule V to the Act.

xii. In our opinion, the Company is not a Nidhi Company. Accordingly, provisions of clause 3(xii) of the Order are not applicable.

xiii. In our opinion, all transactions with the related parties are in compliance with Sections 177 and 188 of Act, where applicable, and the requisite details have been disclosed in the financial statements etc., as required by the applicable accounting standards.

xiv. During the year, the company has made private placement of shares. In respect of the same, in our opinion, the company has complied with the requirement of Section 42 of the Act and the Rules framed there under. Further, in our opinion, the amounts so raised have been used for the purposes for which the funds were raised. During the year, the company did not make preferential allotment of shares/ fully/partly convertible debentures.

xv. In our opinion, the company has not entered into any non-cash transactions with the directors or persons connected with them covered under Section 192 of the Act.

xvi. The company is not required to be registered under Section 45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934.

For Walker Chandiok & Co LLP

(Formerly Walker, Chandiok & Co)

Chartered Accountants

Firm''s Registration No.: 001076N/N500013

per Lalit Kumar

Partner

Membership No.: 095256

Place: Chandigarh

Date: 30 May, 2016


Mar 31, 2015

1. We have audited the accompanying standalone financial statements of KDDL Limited ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 31 March 2015, the Statement of Profit and Loss, the Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management's Responsibility for the Standalone Financial Statements

2. The Company's Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act") with respect to the preparation of these standalone financial statements, that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014 (as amended). This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act; safeguarding the assets of the Company; preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor's Responsibility

3. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these standalone financial statements based on our audit.

4. We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made thereunder.

5. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the standalone financial statements are free from material misstatement.

6. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. The

procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial controls relevant to the Company's preparation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on whether the Company has in place an adequate internal financial controls system over financial reporting and the operating effectiveness of such controls. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Company's Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

7. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the standalone financial statements.

Opinion

8. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid standalone financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31 March 2015, and its profit and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

9. As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2015 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of Section 143(11) of the Act, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.

10. As required by Section 143(3) of the Act, we report that:

a. we have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;

b. in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books;

c. the standalone financial statements dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

d. in our opinion, the aforesaid standalone financial statements comply with the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014 (as amended)

e. on the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on 31 March 2015 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31 March 2015 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164(2) of the Act;

f. with respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor's Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i. as detailed in Note 33 to the standalone financial statements, the Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its standalone financial position;

ii. the Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses and;

iii. there has been no delay in transferring amounts, required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.

Annexure to the Independent Auditor's Report of even date to the members of KDDL Limited, on the financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2015.

Based on the audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting a true and fair view on the financial statements of the Company and taking into consideration the information and explanations given to us and the books of account and other records examined by us in the normal course of audit, we report that:

(I) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b)The Company has a regular program of physical verification of its fixed assets under which fixed assets are verified in a phased manner over a period of three years, which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

(ii) (a) The management has conducted physical verification of inventory at reasonable intervals during the year, except for goods-in-transit and stocks lying with third parties. For stocks lying with third parties at the year-end, written confirmations have been obtained by the management.

(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory and no material discrepancies between physical inventory and book records were noticed on physical verification.

(iii) The Company has granted secured loans to a company covered in the register maintained under Section 189 of the Act; and with respect to the same:

(a) the repayment of principal amount and the payment of interest accrued thereon did not fall due during the period covered by our audit; and

(b) there is no overdue amount in respect of loans granted to such company.

(iv) In our opinion, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, no major weakness has been noticed in the internal control system in respect of these areas.

(v) In our opinion, the Company has complied with the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India, the provisions of Sections 73 to 76 and other relevant provisions of the Act and the , Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014 (as amended) as applicable, with regard to the deposits accepted. According to the information and explanations given to us, no order has been passed by the Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any Court or any other Tribunal, in this regard.

(vi) To the best of our knowledge and belief, the Central Government has not specified maintenance of cost records under sub-section (1) of Section 148 of the Act, in respect of Company's products and services. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 3(vi) of the Order are not applicable.

(vii) (a) Undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, employees' state insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, wealth tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value added tax, cess and other material statutory dues, as applicable, have generally been regularly deposited with the appropriate authorities, though there has been a slight delay in a few cases. Further, no undisputed amounts payable in respect thereof were outstanding at the year-end for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(b) The dues outstanding in respect of income-tax, sales-tax, wealth tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value added tax and cess on account of any dispute, are as follows:

Annexure to the Independent Auditor's Report of even date to the members of KDDL Limited, on the financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2015.

Name of the statute Nature of dues Amount Amount paid (Rs.) under protest

Central Excise Act,1944 Central Excise 8,164,882 -

Finance Act, 1994 Service tax 219,309 -

Income-tax Act, 1961 Income-tax 4,046,108 4,046,108

Income-tax Act, 1961 Income-tax 13,203,431 -

Income-tax Act, 1961 Income-tax 10,625,400 10,625,400

Income-tax Act, 1961 Income-tax 13,437,820 5,606,407

Income-tax Act, 1961 Income-tax 11,683,230 7,473,770

Income-tax Act,1961 Income-tax 9,393,730 5,014,427

Income-tax Act,1961 Income-tax 28,567,250 -

Name of the Statute Period which the Forum where dispute is amount relates pending

Central Excose Act 1944 July 2000- Custom Excise and Service Feb 2003 Tax Appellate Tribunal New Delhi

Finance Act 1994 July 2004-March Custom Excise and Service 2005 Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi

Income Tax Act 1961 FY 2003-04 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi

Income Tax Act 1961 FY 2004-05 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi

Income Tax Act 1961 FY 2005-06 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi

Income Tax Act 1961 FY 2006-07 Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), New Delhi

Income Tax Act 1961 FY 2007-08 Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), New Delhi

Income Tax Act 1961 FY 2008-09 Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), New Delhi

Income Tax Act 1961 FY 2010-11 Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), New Delhi

(c) The Company has transferred the amount required to be transferred to the Investor Education and Protection Fund in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) and rules made thereunder within the specified time.

(viii) In our opinion, the Company has no accumulated losses at the end of the financial year and it has not incurred cash losses in the current and the immediately preceding financial year.

(ix) The Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to any bank or financial institution during the year. The Company did not have any outstanding debentures during the year.

(x) In our opinion, the terms and conditions on which the Company has given guarantee for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions are not, prima facie, prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

(xi) In our opinion, the Company has applied the term loans for the purpose for which these loans were obtained.

(xii) No fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the period covered by our audit.



For Walker Chandiok & Co LLP

(Formerly Walker, Chandiok & Co) Chartered Accountants Firm's Registration No.: 001076N/N500013

Per Lalit Kumar Place: Chandigarh Partner Date: 28 May 2015 Membership No.: 095256


Mar 31, 2014

1. We have audited the accompanying financial statements of KDDL Limited, ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 31 March 2014, the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

2. Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial statements, that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards notified under the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act") read with the General Circular 15/2013 dated 13 September 2013 of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs in respect of section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013. This responsibility includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditors'' Responsibility

3. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

4. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditors'' judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Company''s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of Company''s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

5. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

6. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

i) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31 March 2014;

ii) in the case of Statement of Profit and Loss, of the profit for the year ended on that date; and

iii) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

7. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of Section 227 of the Act, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.

8. As required by Section 227(3) of the Act, we report that:

a. we have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;

b. in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

c. the financial statements dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

d. in our opinion, the financial statements comply with the Accounting Standards notified under the Companies Act, 1956 read with the General Circular 15/2013 dated 13 September 2013 of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs in respect of section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013 ; and

e. on the basis of written representations received from the directors, as on 31 March 2014 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31 March 2014 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of Section 274 of the Act.

Annexure to the Independent Auditors'' Report of even date to the members of KDDL Limited, on the financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2014

Based on the audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting a true and fair view on the financial statements of the Company and taking into consideration the information and explanations given to us and the books of account and other records examined by us in the normal course of audit, we report that:

(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records

showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) The Company has a regular program of physical verification of its fixed assets under which fixed assets are verified in a phased manner over a period of three years which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

(c) In our opinion, a substantial part of fixed assets has not been disposed off during the year.

(ii) (a) The management has conducted physical verification of inventory at reasonable intervals during the year, except for goods-in-transit and stock lying with third parties. For stock lying with third parties at the year end, written confirmations have been obtained by the management.

(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory and no material discrepancies between physical inventory and book records were noticed on physical verification.

(iii) (a) The Company has not granted any loan, secured or unsecured to companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Act. Accordingly, the provisions of clauses 4(iii)(b) to 4(iii) (d) of the Order are not applicable.

(e) The Company has taken unsecured loans from nine parties covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Act. The maximum amount outstanding during the year is s 59,826,000 and the year-end balance is s 39,826,000.

(f) In our opinion, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions of loans taken by the Company are not, prima facie, prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

(g) In respect of loans taken, repayment of the principal amount and the interest is regular.

(iv) In our opinion, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business for

the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, no major weakness has been noticed in the internal control system in respect of these areas.

(v) (a) In our opinion, the particulars of all contracts or arrangements that need to be entered into the register maintained under Section 301 of the Act have been so entered.

(b) Owing to the unique and specialized nature of the items involved and in the absence of any comparable prices, we are unable to comment as to whether the transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or arrangements have been made at the prevailing market prices at the relevant time.

(vi) In our opinion, the Company has complied with the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India, the provisions of Sections 58A and 58AA and other relevant provisions of the Act and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975, as applicable, with regard to the deposits accepted from the public. According to the information and explanations given to us, no order has been passed by the Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any Court or any other Tribunal, in this regard.

(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with its size and the nature of its business.

(viii) We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the Company pursuant to the Rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under clause (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 209 of the Act in respect of Company''s products/services and are of the opinion that, prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. However, we have not made a detailed examination of the cost records with a view to determine whether they are accurate or complete.

(ix) (a) Undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor education and protection fund, employees'' state insurance, income-tax, sales- tax, wealth tax, service tax, custom duty, excise duty, cess and other material statutory dues, as applicable, have generally been regularly deposited with the appropriate authorities, though there has been a slight delay in a few cases. Further, no undisputed amounts payable in respect thereof were outstanding at the year- end for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(b) The dues outstanding in respect of income-tax, sales-tax, wealth tax, service tax, custom duty, excise duty, cess on account of any dispute, are as follows:

Name of the statute Nature of dues Amount Amount paid (inRs.) Under protest (inRs.)

Central Excise Central Excise 8,164,882 - Act, 1944

Finance Act, Service tax 219,309 - 1994

Income-tax Act, Income tax 4,046,108 4,046,108 1961

Income-tax Act, Income tax 13,203,431 - 1961

Income-tax Act, Income tax 10,625,400 10,625,400 1961

Income-tax Act, Income tax 13,437,820 5,606,407 1961

Income-tax Act, Income tax 11,683,230 7,473,770 1961

Income-tax Act, Income tax 9,393,730 5,014,427 1961

Income-tax Act, Income tax 28,567,250 - 1961

Name of the statute Period to which Forum where the amount dispute is relates pending

Central Excise Act, 1944 July 2000- CESTAT, New Delhi

Feb 2003

Finance Act, 1994 July 2004- CESTAT, New Delhi March 2005

Income-tax Act, 1961 AY 2004-05 ITAT, New Delhi

Income-tax Act, 1961 AY 2005-06 ITAT, New Delhi

Income-tax Act, 1961 AY 2006-07 ITAT, New Delhi

Income-tax Act, 1961 AY 2007-08 Commissioner of Income- tax (Appeals), New Delhi

Income-tax Act, 1961 AY 2008-09 Commissioner of Income- tax (Appeals), New Delhi

Income-tax Act, 1961 AY 2009-10 Commissioner of Income- tax (Appeals), New Delhi

Income-tax Act, 1961 AY 2011-12 Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals), New Delhi

(x) In our opinion, the Company has no accumulated losses at the end of the financial year and it has not incurred cash losses in the current and the immediately preceding financial year.

(xi) The Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to any bank or financial institution during the year. The Company did not have any outstanding debentures during the year.

(xii) The Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xii) of the Order are not applicable.

(xiii) In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/ mutual benefit fund/ society. Accordingly, provisions of clause 4(xiii) of the Order are not applicable.

(xiv) In our opinion, the Company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the Order are not applicable.

(xv) In our opinion, the terms and conditions on which the Company has given guarantee for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions are not, prima facie, prejudicial to the interest of the Company

(xvi) In our opinion, the Company has applied the term loans for the purpose for which these loans were obtained.

(xvii) In our opinion, no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term investment by the Company.

(xviii) During the year, the Company has not made preferential allotment of shares to parties covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Act. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xviii) of the Order are not applicable.

(xix) The Company has neither issued nor had any outstanding debentures during the year. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xix) of the Order are not applicable.

(xx) The Company has not raised any money by public issues during the year. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xx) of the Order are not applicable.

(xxi) No fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the period covered by our audit.

For Walker Chandiok & Co LLP

(Formerly Walker, Chandiok & Co.)

Chartered Accountants

Firm Registration No.: 001076N

per B.P. Singh Place : Chandigarh Partner

Dated : 27 May 2014 Membership No.: 70116


Mar 31, 2013

Report on the Financial Statements

1. We have audited the accompanying financial statements of KDDL Limited, ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 31 March 2013, the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

2. Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial statements, that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act"). This responsibility includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditors'' Responsibility

3. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

4. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditors'' judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Company''s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

5. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

6. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

i) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31 March 2013;

ii) in the case of Statement of Profit and Loss, of the loss for the year ended on that date; and

iii) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

7. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of Section 227 of the Act, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.

8. As required by Section 227(3) of the Act, we report that:

a. we have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;

b. in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

c. the financial statements dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

d. in our opinion, the financial statements comply with the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of the Act; and

e. on the basis of written representations received from the directors, as on 31 March 2013 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31 March 2013 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of Section 274 of the Act.

Based on the audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting a true and fair view on the financial statements of the Company and taking into consideration the information and explanations given to us and the books of account and other records examined by us in the normal course of audit, we report that:

(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) The Company has a regular program of physical verification of its fixed assets under which fixed assets are verified in a phased manner over a period of three years which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

In our opinion, a substantial part of fixed assets has not been disposed off during the year.

(ii) (a) The management has conducted physical verification of inventory at reasonable intervals during the year, except for goods-in-transit and stock lying with third parties at year end, written confirmations have been performed by the management.

(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory and no material discrepancies between physical inventory and book records were noticed on physical verification.

(iii) (a) The Company has not granted any loan, secured or unsecured to companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Act. Accordingly, the provisions of clauses 4(iii)(b) to 4(iii) (d) of the Order are not applicable.

(e) The Company has taken unsecured loans from seven parties covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Act. The maximum amount outstanding during the year is ^ 25,110,000 and the year-end balance is ^25,110,000.

(f) In our opinion, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions of loans taken by the Company are not, prima facie, prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

(g) In respect of loans taken, repayment of the principal amount and the interest is regular.

(iv) In our opinion, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, no major weakness has been noticed in the internal control system in respect of these areas.

(v) (a) In our opinion, the particulars of all contracts or arrangements that need to be entered into the register maintained under Section 301 of the Act have been so entered.

(b) Owing to the unique and specialized nature of the items involved and in the absence of any comparable prices, we are unable to comment as to whether the transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or arrangements have been made at the prevailing market prices at the relevant time.

(vi) In our opinion, the Company has complied with the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India, the provisions of Sections 58A and 58AA and other relevant provisions of the Act and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975, as applicable, with regard to the deposits accepted from the public. According to the information and explanations given to us, no order has been passed by the Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any Court or any other Tribunal, in this regard.

(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with its size and the nature of its business.

(viii) We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the Company pursuant to the Rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under clause (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 209 of the Act in respect of Company''s products/services and are of the opinion that, prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. However, we have not made a detailed examination of the cost records with a view to determine whether they are accurate or complete.

(ix) (a) Undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor education and protection fund, employees'' state insurance, income-tax, sales- tax, wealth tax, service tax, custom duty, excise duty, cess and other material statutory dues, as applicable, have generally been regularly deposited with the appropriate authorities, though there has been a slight delay in a few cases. Further, no undisputed amounts payable in respect thereof were outstanding at the year-end for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(b) The dues outstanding in respect of sales-tax, income-tax, custom duty, wealth-tax, excise duty, cess on account of any dispute, are as follows:

Name of the statute Nature of dues Amount Amount paid (in Rs.) Under protest (in Rs.)

Finance Act, Service tax 985,582 1994

Central Excise Central Excise 8,164,882 Act, 1944

Central Excise Central Excise 91,340 Act, 1944

Finance Act, Service tax 219,309 1994

Income-tax Act, Income tax 4,046,108 4,046,108 1961

Income-tax Act, Income tax 13,203,431 1961

Income-tax Act, Income tax 10,625,400 10,625,400 1961

Income-tax Act, Income tax 13,437,820 1961

Income-tax Act, Income tax 11,683,230 7,300,000 1961

Name Period to which Forum where the amount dispute is relates pending

Income-tax Act January 2005- CESTAT, New Delhi June 2005

Income-tax Act July 2000- CESTAT, New Delhi Feb 2003

Income-tax Act July 2002- CESTAT, New Delhi June 2004

Income-tax Act July 2004- CESTAT, New Delhi March 2005

Income-tax Act AY 2004-05 ITAT, New Delhi

Income-tax Act AY 2005-06 ITAT, New Delhi

Income-tax Act AY 2006-07 ITAT, New Delhi

Income-tax Act AY 2007-08 Commissioner of Income- tax (Appeals), New Delhi

Income-tax Act AY 2008-09 Commissioner of Income- tax (Appeals), New Delhi

(x) In our opinion, the Company has no

accumulated losses at the end of the financial year and it has not incurred cash losses in the current and the immediately preceding financial year.

(xi) In our opinion, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to any bank or financial institution during the year. The Company did not have any outstanding debentures during the year.

(xii) The Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xii) of the Order are not applicable.

(xiii) In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/ mutual benefit fund/ society. Accordingly, provisions of clause 4(xiii) of the Order are not applicable.

(xiv) In our opinion, the Company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the Order are not applicable.

(xv) In our opinion, the terms and conditions on which the Company has given guarantee for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions are not, prima facie, prejudicial to the interest of the Company

(xvi) In our opinion, the Company has applied the term loans for the purpose for which these loans were obtained.

(xvii) In our opinion, no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term investment by the Company.

(xviii) During the year, the Company has made preferential allotment of snares to parties covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Act. In our opinion, the price at which shares have been issued is not, prima facie, prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

(xix) The Company has neither issued nor had any outstanding debentures during the year. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xix) of the Orderare not applicable.

(xx) The Company has not raised any money by public issues during the year. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xx) of the Order are not applicable.

(xxi) No fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the period covered by our audit.

For Walker, Chandiok & Co

Chartered Accountants

Firm Registration No.: 001076N

per B.P. Singh

Place: Chandigarh Partner

Dated : 29 May 2013 Membership No.: 70116


Mar 31, 2012

1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of KDDL Limited ('the Company'), as at 31 March 2012, and also the Statement of Profit and Loss and the Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto (collectively referred as the 'financial statements'). These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

3. As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 ('the Order') (as amended) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub- section (4A)of Section 227of the Companies Act, 1956 ('the Act'), we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and5of the Order

4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report that:

a) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

(c) The financial statements dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

(d) On the basis of written representations received from the directors, as on 31 March 2012 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31 March 2012 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of Section 274 of the Act;

(e) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the financial statements dealt with by this report comply with the accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of the Act and give the information required by the Act, in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, in the case of:

(i) the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Companyasat31March 2012;

(ii) the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the profit for the year ended on that date; and

(iii) the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Annexure to the Auditors' Report of even date to the members of KDDL Limited, on the financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2012 Based on the audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting a true and fair view on the financial statements of the Company and taking into consideration the information and explanations given to us and the books of account and other records examined by us in the normal course of audit, we report that:

(I) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) The Company has a regular program of physical verification of its fixed assets under which fixed assets are verified in a phased manner over a period of three years which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

(c) In our opinion, a substantial part of fixed assets has not been disposed off during the year.

(II) (a) The management has conducted physical verification of inventory at reasonable intervals during the year.

(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.

(III) (a) The Company has not granted any loan, secured or unsecured to companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Act. Accordingly, the provisions of clauses 4(iii)(b) to 4(iii)(d) of the Order are not applicable.

(e) The Company has taken unsecured loans from five parties covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Act. The maximum amount outstanding during the year is Rs. 3,857,000 and the year-end balance is Rs. 3,790,000.

(f) In our opinion, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions of loans taken by the Company are not, prima facie, prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

(g) In respect of loans taken, payment of the principal amount and Interest is regular.

(IV) In our opinion, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, no major weakness has been noticed in the internal control system in respect of these areas.

(V) (a) In our opinion, the particulars of all contracts or arrangements that need to be entered into the register maintained under Section 301 of the Act have been so entered.

(b) Owing to the unique and specialized nature of the items involved and in the absence of any comparable prices, we are unable to comment as to whether the transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or arrangements have been made at prevailing market prices at the relevant time.

(vi) In our opinion, the Company has complied with the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India, the provisions of Sections 58A and 58AA and other relevant provisions of the Act and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975 as applicable with regard to the deposits accepted from the public. According to the information and explanations given to us, no order has been passed by the Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any Court or any other Tribunal, in this regard.

(VII) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with its size and the nature of its business.

(VIII) We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the Company pursuant to the Rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under clause (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 209 of the Act in respect of Company's products/services and are of the opinion that, prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. However, we have not made a detailed examination of the cost records with a view to determine whether they are accurate or complete.

(IX) (a) Undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor education and protection fund, employees' state insurance, income-tax, sales- tax, wealth-tax, service-tax, custom duty, excise duty, cess and other material statutory dues, as applicable, have generally been regularly deposited with the appropriate authorities, though there has been a slight delay in a few cases. No undisputed amounts payable in respect thereof were outstanding at the year- end for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(b) The dues outstanding in respect of sales-tax, income-tax, custom duty, wealth-tax, excise duty, cess on account of any dispute, are as follows :

Name of the Nature of Amount Amount Amount statute dues (Rs.) deposited outstanding under (Rs.) protest (Rs.)

Finance Act, Service tax 985,582 - 985,582 1994

Central Excise Central 8,164,882 - 8,164,882 Act, 1944 Excise

Central Excise Central 91,340 - 91,340 Act, 1944 Excise

Finance Act, Service tax 219,309 - 219,309 1994

Income-tax Income tax 4,046,108 4,046,108 - Act, 1961

Income-tax Income tax 13,203,431 - 13,203,431 Act, 1961

Income-tax Income tax 10,625,400 10,625,400 - Act, 1961

Income-tax Income tax 13,437,820 - 13,437,820 Act, 1961

Income-tax Income tax 11,683,230 5,800,000 5,883,230 Act, 1961



Name of the Period to Forum statute which the where amount relates dispute Is pending

Finance Act, January 2005- CESTAT, 1994 June 2005 New Delhi

Central Excise July 2000- CESTAT, Act, 1944 Feb 2003 New Delhi

Central Excise July 2002- CESTAT, 1944 June 2004 New Delhi

Finance Act, July 2004- CESTAT, 1994 March 2005 New Delhi

Income- tax AY 2004-05 ITAT, New Act,1961 Delhi

Income- tax AY 2005-06 ITAT, New Act, 1961 Delhi

Income- tax AY 2006-07 ITAT, New Act,1961 Delhi

Income- tax AY 2007-08 Commissioner Act,1961 of Income- tax (Appeals), New Delhi

Income- tax AY 2008-09 Commissioner Act,1961 of Income- tax (Appeals), New Delhi

(x) In our opinion, the Company has no accumulated losses at the end of the financial year and it has not incurred cash losses in the current and the immediately preceding financial year.

(xi) The Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to any bank during the year. There are no dues payable to financial institutions or debenture- holders.

(xii) The Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xii) of the Order are not applicable.

(xiii) In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/ mutual benefit fund/ society. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of the Order are not applicable.

(xiv) In our opinion, the Company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the Order are not applicable.

(xv) In our opinion, the terms and conditions on which the Company has given guarantee for loans taken by others from banks or financial Institutions are not, prima facie, prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

(xvi) In our opinion, the Company has applied the term loans for the purpose for which these loans were obtained.

(xvii) In our opinion, no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term investment.

(xviii) During the year, the Company has made preferential allotment of shares to parties and companies covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Act. In our opinion, the price at which shares have been issued is not prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

(xix) The Company has neither issued nor had any outstanding debentures during the year. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xix) of the Order are not applicable.

(xx) The Company has not raised any money by public issues during the year. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xx)of the Order are not applicable.

(xxi) No fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the period covered by our audit. For Walker, Chandiok & Co

Chartered Accountants

Firm Registration No.: 001076N

per B.P. Singh

Place : Chandigarh Partner

Dated : 3 August 2012 Membership No.: 70116


Mar 31, 2011

1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of KDDL Limited, (the 'Company') as at 31 March 2011, and also the Profit and Loss Account and the Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto (collectively referred as the 'financial statements'). These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

3. As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 (the 'Order') (as amended), issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub- section (4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956 (the 'Act'), we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.

4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report that:

a. We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

b. In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

c. The financial statements dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

d. On the basis of written representations received from the directors, as on 31 March 2011 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on 31 March 2011 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Act;

e. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the financial statements dealt with by this report comply with the accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Act and the Rules framed there under and give the information required by the Act, in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, in the case of:

i) the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31 March 2011;

ii) the Profit and Loss Account, of the profit for the year ended on that date; and

iii) the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Annexure to the Auditors' Report of even date to the members of KDDL Limited, on the financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2011

Based on the audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting a true and fair view on the financial statements of the Company and taking into consideration the information and explanations given to us and the books of account and other records examined by us in the normal course of audit, we report that:

(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) The Company has a regular programme of physical verification of its fixed assets by which fixed assets are verified in a phased manner over a period of three years. In our opinion, this periodicity of physical verification is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

(c) In our opinion, a substantial part of fixed assets has not been disposed off during the year.

(ii) (a) The inventory, excluding goods in transit, has been physically verified during the year by the management. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is reasonable.

(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.

(iii) (a) There is one company covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Act to which the Company has granted unsecured loan. The maximum amount outstanding during the year was Rs. 14,000,000 and the year-end balance was Rs. 14,000,000.

(b) In our opinion, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions of such loans are not, prima facie, prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

(c) In respect of loans granted, repayment of principal amounts is as stipulated and payment of interest has been regular.

(d) There is no amount overdue in respect of loans granted to company listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Act.

(e) The Company had taken loans from three parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Act. The maximum amount outstanding during the year was Rs. 3,800,000 and the year- end balance was Rs. 1,700,000.

(f) In our opinion, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions for such loans are not, prima facie, prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

(g) In respect of loans taken, repayment of the principal amount is as stipulated and payment of interest has been regular.

(iv) In our opinion, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services.

(v) (a) In our opinion, the particulars of all contracts or arrangements that need to be entered into the register maintained under section 301 of the Act have been so entered.

(b) Owing to the unique and specialized nature of the items involved and in the absence of any comparable prices, we are unable to comment as to whether the transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or arrangements have been made at prevailing market prices at the relevant time.

(vi) In our opinion, the Company has complied with the provisions of sections 58A and 58AA and other relevant provisions of the Act and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975 with regard to the deposits accepted from the public. No order has been passed by the Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any Court or any other Tribunal.

(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with its size and the nature of its business.

(viii) To the best of our knowledge and belief, the Central Government has not prescribed maintenance of cost records under clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 209 of the Act, in respect of Company's products. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(viii) of the Order are not applicable.

(ix) (a) Undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor education and protection fund, employees' state insurance, income-tax, sales- tax, wealth-tax, service-tax, custom duty, excise duty, cess and other material statutory dues, as applicable, have generally been regularly deposited with the appropriate authorities, though there has been a delay in a few cases. No undisputed amounts payable in respect thereof were outstanding at the year end for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(b) The dues outstanding in respect of sales-tax, income-tax, custom duty, wealth-tax, excise duty, cess on account of any dispute, are as follows:

Name of the statute Nature of dues Amount (Rs.) Period to which the Forum where dispute is pending amount relates

Finance Act, 1994 Service tax 985,582 January 2005-June 2006 CESTAT, New Delhi

Central Excise Act, 1944 Central Excise 8,164,882 July 2000 - Feb 2003 CESTAT, New Delhi

Central Excise Act, 1944 Central Excise 91,340 July 2002 - June 2004 CESTAT, New Delhi

Finance Act, 1994 Service tax 219,309 July 2004 -March 2005 CESTAT, New Delhi

Income-tax Act, 1961 Income tax 2,468,668 AY 2004-05 ITAT, New Delhi

Income-tax Act, 1961 Income tax 2,286,811 AY 2005-06 ITAT, New Delhi

Income-tax Act, 1961 Income tax 10,625,400 AY 2006-07 ITAT, New Delhi

Income-tax Act, 1961 Income tax 13,437,820 AY 2007-08 Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), New Delhi

(x) In our opinion, the Company has no accumulated losses at the end of the financial year and it has not incurred cash losses in the current and the immediately preceding financial year.

(xi) In our opinion, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to a financial institution or a bank. The Company has no dues payable to debenture holders during the year.

(xii) The Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xii) of the Order are not applicable.

(xiii) In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/ mutual benefit fund/ society. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of the Order are not applicable.

(xiv) In our opinion, the Company is not dealing in or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the Order are not applicable.

(xv) In our opinion, the terms and conditions on which the Company has given guarantee for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions are not, prima facie, prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

(xvi) In our opinion, the Company has applied the term loans for the purpose for which the loans were obtained.

(xvii) In our opinion, no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term investment.

(xviii) The Company has made preferential allotment of shares to parties and companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Act. In our opinion, the price at which shares have been issued is not prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

(xix) The Company has neither issued nor had any outstanding debentures during the year. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xix) of the Order are not applicable.

(xx) The Company has not raised any money by public issues during the year. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xx) of the Order are not applicable.

(xxi) According to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the period covered by our audit, except an instance where in a staff member was involved in embezzlement of funds amounting to Rs. 629,295 (net of recoveries made by the Company till date), which has been reported to us by the management. As further informed to us, the Company has further obtained post dated cheques from such staff member and has taken adequate follow up action, including strengthening of systems.

For Walker, Chandiok & Co.

Chartered Accountants

Firm Registration No.: 001076N

per B.P. Singh

Place: New Delhi Partner

Dated: 28 July 2011 Membership No.70116


Mar 31, 2010

We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of KDDL Limited (Formerly Kamla Dials and Devices Limited), (the Company) as at 31 March 2010, the Profit and Loss Account and also the Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto (collectively referred as the.financial statements). These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 (the Order) (as amended), issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956 (the Act), we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.

Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report that:

a. We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

b. In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of tt books;

c. The financial statements dealt with by this re are in agreement with the books of account;

d. On the basis of written representations rece from the directors, as on 31 March 2010 and ta on record by the Board of Directors, we report none of the directors is disqualified as on 31 Ma 2010 from being appointed as a director in term clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of Act;

e. In our opinion and to the best of our informal and according to the explanations given to us, financial statements dealt with by this rer. comply with the accounting standards referred to sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Act and Rules framed there under and give the informat required by the Act, in the manner so required a give a true and fair view in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in Inc in the case of:

i) the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of 1 Company as at 31 March 2010;

ii) the Profit and Loss Account, of the loss for t year ended on that date; and

iii) the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows 1 the year ended on that date.

Annexure to the Auditors Report of even date to the members of KDDL Limited (formerly Kamla Dials and Devices Limited), on the financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2010

Based on the audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting a true and fair view on the financial statements of the Company and taking into consideration the information and explanations given to us and the books of account and other records examined by us in the normal course of audit, we report that: (i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) The Company has a programme of physical verification of its fixed assets by which fixed assets are verified in a phased manner over a period of three years. In our opinion, this periodicity of physical verification is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

(c) In our opinion, a substantial part of fixed assets has not been disposed off during the year.

(ii) (a) The inventory has been physically verified during the year by the management. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is reasonable.

(b) The procedures for physical verification of inventory followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.

(iii) (a) There is one company covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Act to which the Company has granted unsecured loan. The maximum amount outstanding during the year was Rs.14,000,000 and the year-end balance was Rs.14,000,000.

(b) In our opinion, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions of such loans are not, prima facie, prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

(c) In respect of loans granted, repayment of the principal amounts is as stipulated and payment of interest has been regular.

(d) There is no amount overdue in respect of loan granted to the company listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Act.

(e) The Company has taken an unsecured loan from a Company covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Act. The maximum amount outstanding during the year was Rs 2,700,000 and the year-end balance was Rs. 2,700,000.

(f) In our opinion, the rate of interest, and other terms and conditions for such loans are not, prima facie, prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

(g) In respect of loans taken, repayment of principal amount is as stipulated and payment of interest has been regular.

(iv) In our opinion, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services.

(v) (a) In our opinion, the particulars of all contracts or arrangements that need to be entered into the register maintained under section 301 of the Act have been so entered.

(b) Owing to the unique and specialized nature of the items involved and in the absence of any comparable prices, we are unable to comment as to whether the transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or arrangements have been made at prevailing market prices at the relevant time.

(vi) In our opinion, the Company has complied with the provisions of sections 58A and 58AA and other relevant provisions of the Act and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975 with regard to the deposits accepted from the public. No Order has been passed by the Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any Court or any other Tribunal.

(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with its size and the nature of its business.

(viii)To the best of our knowledge and belief, the Central Government has not prescribed maintenance of cost records under clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 209 of the Act, in respect of the Companys products. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(viii) of the Order are not applicable.

(ix) (a) The Company is generally regular in depositing the undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor education and protection fund, employees state insurance, income tax, sales tax, wealth tax, service tax, custom duty, excise duty, cess and other material statutory dues, as applicable, with the appropriate authorities. Further, no undisputed amounts payable in respect thereof were outstanding at the year end for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(b) The dues outstanding in respect of sales-tax, income-tax, custom duty, wealth-tax, excise duty, cess etc on account of dispute, are as follows:

Name of the statute Nature of dues Amount (Rs.) Period to which the amount relates

Finance Act, 1994 SeviceTax 985,582 Jan 2005-June 2006 (including penalty)

Central Excise Act, 1944 Central Excise 59,106 August 2007

Central Excise Act Central Excise 4,082,441 July 1997-Feb. 2003

Central Excise Act Central Excise 45,670 July 2002-June 2004

Finance Act, 1994 Service Tax 676,317 July 2003 - December 2004

Income Tax Act, 1961 Income Tax 3,646,108 Assessment Year 2004-05

Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 Municipal Tax 5,551,447 1996-97 to 2008-09

Name of the Statute Forum where dispute is pending

Finance Act, 1994 Commissioner (Appeals), CESTAT, New Delhi

Central Excise Act,1944 Joint Secretary, Govt, of India, Ministry of Finance, Deptt. of Revenue, New Delhi

Central Excise Act, CESTAT, New Delhi

Centarl Excise Act, CESTAT, New Delhi

CESTAT, New Delhi

Income Tax Act,1961 Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), New Delhi

Panjab Municipal Act Deputy Commissioner, Mohali 1911

x) In our opinion, the Company has no accumulated losses at the end of the financial year and it has not incurred cash losses in the current and the immediately preceding financial year.

(xi) In our opinion, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to a financial institution or a bank. The Company has no dues payable to debenture holders during the year.

(xii) The Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xii) of the Order are not applicable.

(xiii) In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/ mutual benefit fund/ society. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of the Order are not applicable.

(xiv) In our opinion, the Company is not dealing in or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the Order are not applicable.

(xv) In our opinion, the terms and conditions on which the Company has given guarantee for loans taken by subsidiaries from banks or financial institutions are not, prima facie, prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

(xvi) In our opinion, the Company has applied the term loans for the purpose for which the loans were obtained.

(xvii)ln our opinion, funds raised on short-term basis have not been used for long-term investment.

(xviii)The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties or companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Act. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xviii) of the Order are not applicable.

(xix)The Company has neither issued nor had any outstanding debentures during the year. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xix) of the Order are not applicable.

(xx) The Company has not raised any money by public issues during the year. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xx) of the Order are not applicable.

(xxi) No fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the period covered by our audit.

For Walker, Chandiok & C Chartered Accountan

Firm Registration No. 001076

Place : Chandigarh

Dated : 30 August 2010

per B.P. Sing Partrtr Membership No. 7011

Find IFSC