Jun 30, 2010
We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of MYM Technologies Limited
as at 30th June, 2010 and also the Profit & Loss Account for the period
ended on the date annexed thereto. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys Management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statement. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis of
our opinion.
As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) order 2003 and as
amended by the Companies (Auditors Report) (Amendment) Order 2004,
issued by the Central Government of India in terms of the sub-section
(4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the
annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of
the said order.
Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report
that:
(I) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
Audit;
(ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the company so far as appears from our examination of
those books;
(iii) The Balance Sheet & Profit & Loss Account dealt with by this
report are in agreement with the books of account;
(iv) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet & Profit & Loss Account dealt
with by this report comply with the Accounting standards referred to in
sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of Companies Act, 1956;
(v) On the basis of written representations received from the
Directors, as on 30th June, 2010 and taken on record by the Board of
Directors, we report that none of the Directors is disqualified as on
30th June, 2010 from being appointed Director in terms of clause (g) of
sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;
(vi) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information
required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give
a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India;
(a) In the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 30th June , 2010;
(b) In the case of the Profit & Loss Account, of the Profit for the
period ended on that date;
(c) In the case of cash flow statement, of the cash flows for the year
ended on that date:
Annexure to the Auditors report referred to in paragraph 3 of our
report of even date.
I. (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of Fixed
Assets.
(b) As explained to us, the fixed assets have been physically verified
by the management at reasonable intervals and no material discrepancies
between the book records and the physical inventory have been noticed
on such verification.
(c) The Company has not disposed off substantial part of the Fixed
Assets during the year.
II. (a) There is no inventory.
III. (a) The Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured
to Companies, Firms or other Parties covered in the register maintained
U/s.301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(b) As the Company has not granted any loans ,the clause of whether the
rate of interest & other terms and conditions on which loans have been
granted to parties listed in the register maintained under section 301
is prejudicial to the interest of company, is not applicable.
(c) As no loans are granted by company, the clause of receipt of
interest & principal amount from parties is not applicable to the
company.
(d) No loans have been granted to Companies, Firms & other parties
listed in the register U/s.301 of the Companies Act, 1956 , hence
overdue amount of more than rupees one lacs does not arise and the
clause is not applicable.
(e) The Company has taken loans, secured or unsecured from Companies,
Firms or other Parties covered in the register maintained U/s.301 of
the Companies Act, 1956.
(f) The rate of interest & other terms and conditions on which loans
have been taken from parties listed in the register maintained under
section 301 is not prejudicial to the interest of company.
(g) The repayment of interest & principal amount to parties are made in
accordance with the terms and conditions.
IV. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there are generally adequate internal control systems
commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of its
business with regard to purchase of fixed assets and for sale of goods
and services. There is no continuing failure by the company to correct
any major weaknesses in internal control.
V. (a) In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us, since no contracts or arrangements referred to in section
301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been made by the company in respect
of any party in the financial year, the entry in the register U/s.301
of the Companies Act, 1956 does not arise.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, as no
such contracts or arrangements made by the company, the applicability
of the clause of charging the reasonable price having regard to the
prevailing market prices at the relevant time does not arise.
VI. The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public and
hence the applicability of the clause of directives issued by the
Reserve Bank of India and provisions of section 58A, 58AA or any other
relevant provisions of the Act and the rules framed there under does
not arise. As per information and explanations given to us the order
from the Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve
Bank of India or any Court or any other Tribunal has not been received
by the Company.
VII. In our opinion, the company is having internal audit system,
commensurate with its size and nature of its business.
VIII. In respect of the Company, the Central Government has not
prescribed maintenance of cost records under clause (d) of sub-section
(1) of section 209 of the Companies Act, 1956.
IX. a) The Company does not have employees who come under provision of
PF, Income Tax, and any other statutory dues with the appropriate
authorities and at the last of the financial year there were no amounts
outstanding which were due for more than 6 months from the date they
became payable.
b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
undisputed amounts are payable in respect of PF, Income Tax, and any
other statutory dues as at the end of the period, for a period more
than six months from the date they became payable.
c) According to the information and explanation given to us, there are
no dues of sales tax, income tax, customs duty, wealth tax, excise duty
and cess which have not been deposited on account of any dispute.
X. The Company has been registered for a period of not less than 5
years, and the company has no accumulated losses at the end of the
financial year and the company has not incurred cash losses in this
financial year and in the immediately preceding financial year.
XI. According to information and explanations given to us, the Company
has not defaulted in repayment of dues to financial Institutions or
banks.
XII. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not granted any loans or advances on the basis of security
by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities and hence
the applicability of the clause regarding maintenance of adequate
documents in respect of loans does not arise.
XIII. This clause is not applicable to this Company as the Company is
not covered by the provisions of special statute applicable to Chit
Fund in respect of Nidhi/Mutual Benefit Fund/Societies.
XIV. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities, Debentures and
other investments and hence the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the
Companies (Auditors Report) Order 2003, are not applicable to the
Company.
XV. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from
Banks or Financial Institutions, and hence the applicability of this
clause regarding terms and conditions which are prejudicial to the
interest of the company does not arise.
XVI. According to the information and explanations given to us, no
funds of Short Term nature were deployed for long-term application.
XVIII. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not made any preferential allotment of Shares to parties
and Companies covered in the Register maintained under section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956 and hence the applicability of the clause
regarding the price at which shares have been issued and whether the
same is prejudicial to the interest of the Company does not arise.
XIX According to the information and explanations given to us, the
company does not have any debentures and hence the applicability of the
clause regarding the creation of security or charge in respect of
debentures issued does not arise.
XX. According to information and explanations given to us, the company
has not raised money by way of public issues during the year, hence the
clause regarding the disclosure by the management on the end use of
money raised by Public Issue is not applicable.
XXI. According to the information and explanations given to us, no
fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the year
under audit.
For JBRK & CO,
Chartered Accountants
Firm Reg No: 05575 S
Sd/-
PLACE: Hyderabad P. Jitendra Kumar
DATE: 24.10.2010 Partner
M.No: 022109
Jun 30, 2009
We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of MYM Technologies Limited
as at 30th June , 2009 and also the Profit & Loss Account for the
period ended on the date annexed thereto. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Companys Management. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our
audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statement. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis of
our opinion.
As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) order 2003 and as
amended by the Companies (Auditors Report) (Amendment) Order 2004,
issued by the Central Government of India in terms of the sub-section
(4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the
annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of
the said order.
Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report
that:
(i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
Audit;
(ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the company so far as appears from our examination of
those books;
(iii) The Balance Sheet & Profit & Loss Account dealt with by this
report are in agreement with the books of account;
(iv) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet & Profit & Loss Account dealt
with by this report comply with the Accounting standards referred to in
sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of Companies Act, 1956;
(v) On the basis of written representations received from the
Directors, as on 30th June, 2009 and taken on record by the Board of
Directors, we report that none of the Directors is disqualified as on
30th June, 2009 from being appointed Director in terms of clause (g) of
sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;
(vi) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information
required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give
a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India;
(a) In the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 30th June, 2009;
(b) In the case of the Profit & Loss Account, of the Profit for the
period ended on that date;
(c) In the case of cash flow statement, of the cash flows of the
Company for the year ended on that date;
ANNEXURE TO THE AUDITORS REPORT
I. (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of Fixed
Assets.
(b) As explained to us, the fixed assets have been physically verified
by the management at reasonable intervals and no material discrepancies
between the book records and the physical inventory have been noticed
on such verification.
(c) The Company has not disposed off substantial part of the Fixed
Assets during the year.
II. (a) There is no inventory.
III. (a) The Company has notgranted any loans, secured or unsecured to
Companies,
Firms or other Parties covered in the register maintained U/s.301 of
the Companies Act, 1956.
(b) As the Company has not granted any loans ,the clause of whether the
rate of interest & other terms and conditions on which loans have been
granted to parties listed in the register maintained under section 301
is prejudicial to the interest of company, is not applicable.
(c) As no loans are granted by company, the clause of receipt of
interest & principal amount from parties is not applicable to the
company.
(d) No loans have been granted to Companies, Firms & other parties
listed in the register U/s.301 of the Companies Act, 1956, hence
overdue amount of more than rupees one lakh does not arise and the
clause is not applicable.
(e) The Company has taken any loans, secured or unsecured from
Companies,
Firms or other Parties covered in the register maintained U/s.301 of
the Companies Act, 1956.
(f) The rate of interest & other terms and conditions on which loans
have been taken from parties listed in the register maintained under
section 301 is not prejudicial to the interest of company.
(g) The repayment of interest & principal amount to parties are made in
accordance with the terms and conditions.
IV. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there are generally adequate internal control systems
commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of its
business with regard to purchase of fixed assets and for sale of goods
and services. There is no continuing failure by the company to correct
any major weaknesses in internal control.
V. (a) In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us , since no contracts or arrangements referred to in section
301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been made by the company in respect
of any party in the financial year, the entry in the register U/s.301
of the Companies Act, 1956 does notarise.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, as no
such contracts or arrangements made by the company, the applicability
of the clause of charging the reasonable price having regard to the
prevailing market prices at the relevant time does not arise.
VI. The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public and
hence the applicability of the clause of directives issued by the
Reserve Bank of India and provisions of section 58A.58AA or any other
relevant provisions of the Act and the rules framed there under does
not arise. As per information and explanations given to us the order
from the Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve
Bank of India or any Court or any other Tribunal has not been received
by the Company.
VII. In our opinion, the company is having internal audit system,
commensurate with its size and nature of its business.
VIII. In respect of the Company, the Central Government has not
prescribed maintenance of cost records under clause (d) of sub-section
(1) of section 209 of the Companies Act, 1956.
IX. a) The Company does not have employees who come under provision of
PF,
Income Tax, and any other statutory dues with the appropriate
authorities and at the last of the financial year there were no amounts
outstanding which were due for more than 6 months from the date they
became payable.
b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
undisputed amounts are payable in respect of PF, Income Tax, and any
other statutory dues as at the end of the period, for a period more
than six months from the date they became payable.
c) According to the information and explanation given to us, there is
an amount of Rs. 31,54,094/- outstanding in respect of income tax.
There are no dues of sales tax, customs duty, wealth tax, excise duty
and cess which have not been deposited on account of any dispute.
X. The Company has been registered for a period of not less than 5
years, and the company has no accumulated losses at the end of the
financial year and the company has not incurred cash losses in this
financial year and in the immediately preceding financial year.
XI. According to information and explanations given to us, the Company
has not defaulted in repayment of dues to financial Institutions or
banks.
XII. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not granted any loans or advances on the basis of security
by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities and hence
the applicability of the clause regarding maintenance of adequate
documents in respect of loans does not arise.
XIII. This clause is not applicable to this Company as the Company is
not covered by the provisions of special statute applicable to Chit
Fund in respect of Nidhi / Mutual Benefit Fund/Societies.
XIV. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities, Debentures and
other investments and hence the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the
Companies (Auditors Report) Order 2003, are not applicable to the
Company.
XV. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from
Banks or Financial Institutions, and hence the applicability of this
clause regarding terms and conditions which are prejudicial to the
interest of the company does not arise.
XVI. According to the information and explanations given to us, no
funds of Short Term nature were deployed for long-term application.
XVIII. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not made any preferential allotment of Shares to parties
and Companies covered in the Register maintained under section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956 and hence the applicability of the clause
regarding the price at which shares have been issued and whether the
same is prejudicial to the interest of the Company does not arise.
XIX According to the information and explanations given to us, the
company does not have any debentures and hence the applicability of the
clause regarding the creation of security or charge in respect of
debentures issued does not arise.
XX. According to information and explanations given to us, the company
has not raised money by way of public issues during the year, hence the
clause regarding the disclosure by the management on the end use of
money raised by Public Issue is not applicable.
XXI. According to the information and explanations given to us, no
fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the year
under audit.
For JBRK & CO.,
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
Sd/-
PLACE : HYDERABAD P. JITENDRA KUMAR
DATE : 24/11/2009 PARTNER