Home  »  Company  »  Prime Urban Dev.  »  Quotes  »  Auditor Report
Enter the first few characters of Company and click 'Go'

Auditor Report of Prime Urban Development India Ltd.

Mar 31, 2015

We have audited the accompanying financial statement of Prime Urban Development India Limited ('the Company') which comprises the Balance sheet as at 31 st March, 2015, the Statement of Profit and Loss and the cash flow statement for the year then ended, and a summary of the significant accounting policy and other explanatory information.

Management's Responsibility for the Financial Statements .

The Company's Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in section 134 (5) of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act")with respect to the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the Accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the accounting standards specified under section 133 of the act, read with rule 7 of the companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014.This responsibility also includes the maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the act for safeguarding the assets of the company and for preventing and detecting the frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgment and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of internal control, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor's Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the act and the rules made thereunder.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Company's preparation of the financial statements that give true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also Includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by companies directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the financial statements.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31st March, 2015;

(b) in the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the Profit of the Company for the year ended on that date, and

(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows of the Company for the year ended on that date.

(a) We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit.

-(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books.

(c) The Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash Flow Statement dellt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account.

(d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards referred to in Section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013, read with rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014.

(e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on 31st March, 2015 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March, 2015 from being appointed as a director in terms of sub section (2) of section 164 of the Companies Act, 2013.

i. The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position in its financial statements,

ii. In our opinion and as per the information and explanations provides to us, the Company has not entered into any long-term contracts including derivative contracts, requiring provision under applicable laws or accounting standards, for material foreseeable losses, and

iii. There has been no delay in transferring the amounts, required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.

Annexure to the Auditor's Report

The Annexure referred to in paragraph 1 of Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements of our report of even date to the members of Prime

Urban Development India Limited for the year ended 31st March 2015. We report that:

(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets

(b) As explained to us, the fixed assets are physically verified in a phased periodical manner, which, in our opinion, is reasonable, having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets and no material discrepancies were noted on such verification;

(ii) (a) The Inventory has been Physically verified during the year by the Management.

(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the company and the nature of its business.

(c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the company is maintaining proper records of inventories and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification as compared to the book records.

(iii) As informed to us, during the year the company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 189 of the Companies Act. Accordingly the sub-clauses (a) and (b) are not applicable to the company.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of its business, for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any continuing failure to correct major weakness in internal control system.

(v) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not accepted any deposits in terms of directives issued by Reserve Bank of India and the provisions of Section 73 to 76 or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act and the rules framed there under.

' (vi) We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the Company pursuant sub-section (1) of Section 148 of the Companies Act, and are of the opinion that prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained.

(vii) (a) The company is regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, employees' state insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value added tax, cess and any other statutory dues with the appropriate authorities and we have been informed that there are no arrears of outstanding statutory dues as at the last day of the financial year under audit for a period of more than six months form the date they became payable.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, there are following dues of which have not been deposited on account of dispute and the same is being contested by the Company:

Name of the Statute Nature of the Dues Amount in Lacs

Income Tax Act,1961 Income Tax 551.09

"CST Act, 1956 Central Sales tax 4.87

Name of the Statute Period to which Forum where the amount relates dispute is pending

Income Tax Act 1961 A.Y.2009 -10 Hon'ble High ' Court of Madras

CST ACt 1956 F.Y.1993 -94 Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal

(c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, amounts required to be transferred to Investor Education and Protection Fund in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) and rules made there under have been transferred to such fund within time.

(viii) The Company does not have accumulated losses as at 31st March 2015. The Company has not incurred any cash loss during the financial year covered by our audit and Company had incurred cash loss of Rs.50.47 lakhs during immediately preceding financial year

(ix) Based on our audit procedures and according to the information, the company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to Bank(s) or Financial Institution(s)

(x) During the year, the Company has not given guarantees for loans taken by others from bank(s) or financial institution(s)

(xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not borrowed any Term Loan(s) during the year.

(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us, no material fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.

For M.S.Jagannathan & Visvanathan Chartered Accountants ICAIFRN 001209S

N.Rajesh Place: Mumbai Membership No.212417 Date: 29/05/2015 Partner


Mar 31, 2014

We have audited the accompanying financial statement of Prime Urban Development India Limited (''the Company'') which comprises the Balance sheet as at 31st March, 2014, the Statement of Profit and Loss and the cash flow statement for the year then ended, and a summary of the significant accounting policy and other explanatory information.

Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act") read with the General Circular 15/2013 dated 13th September, 2013 of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs in respect of Section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013. This responsibility .includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor''s Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with the ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Company''s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company''s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31 st March, 2014;

(b) in the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the Loss of the Company for the year ended on that date, and

(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows of the Company for the year ended on that date.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956 and sub-section (11) of Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.

2. As required by Section 227(3) of the Act, we report that:

(a) We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit.

(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books and the report of the accounts of the branch offices audited by firm of Chartered Accountant(s) has been forwarded to us as required by clause (c) of Sub-section (3) of Section 228 and have been dealt with in preparing our report in the manner considered necessary by us.

(c) The Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account.

(d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Lbss, and the Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards notified under Companies Act, 1956, read with the General Circular 15/2013 dated 13th September, 2013 of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs in respect of Section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013.

(e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on 31st March, 2014 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March, 2014 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956 and sub-section (2) of Section 164 of the Companies Act, 2013.

Annexure to the Auditor''s Report

The Annexure referred to in paragraph 1 of Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements of our report of even date to the members of Prime Urban Development India Limited for the year ended 31st March 2014. We report that:

i) a) The company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

b) As explained to us, the fixed assets are physically verified in a phased periodical manner, which, in our opinion, is reasonable, having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets and no material discrepancies were noted on such verification.

c) During the year, the Company has not disposed off a substantial part of its fixed assets, which affect the going concern status of the Company.

ii) a) The Inventory has been physically verified during the year by the Management. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is reasonable.

b) The procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the company and the nature of its business.

c) The company has maintained proper records of inventory. As explained to us, no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification of inventories as compared to the book records.

iii) a) The Company has not granted any loans secured or unsecured to firms, companies or other parties covered in the Register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 and Section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013 and hence sub clauses b, c & d are not applicable.

b) The Company has taken advance from two parties covered in the Register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 and Section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013 during the pervious year(s) and outstanding at the year-end was Rs.516.96 lacs and maximum outstanding during the year was Rs.517.40 lacs.

c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, other terms and conditions on which such loans have been taken are prima facie not prejudicial to the interest of the company.

iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there is an adequate internal control procedures commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard to purchase of inventory and fixed assets and with regard to the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any continuing failure to correct major weakness in internal control system.

v) a) According to the information explanations given to us, we are of the opinion that the transactions that made in pursuance of contracts or arrangements, that need to be entered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 and Section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013 have been so entered, b) In our opinion, and according to the information and explanations given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts or arrangements referred to in (v)(a) above and exceeding the value of rupees five lakhs in respect of any party during the year have been made at prices which are reasonable having regard to prevailing market prices at the relevant time.

vi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us the company has complied with the provisions of section 58A and 58AA of the Companies Act, 1956 and the companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules 1975 with regard to the deposits accepted from the public. No order has been passed by the National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any court or any other Tribunal.

vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with the size and nature of its business.

viii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Central Government has not prescribed the mainte- nance of cost records under Section 209(1 )(d) of the Companies Act, 1956 and Section 128 read with Section 2(13) of the Companies Act, 2013 in respect of the business activities carried out by the Company.

ix) a) The Company is regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including Provident Fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Income Tax, Investor Education protection Fund, Value Added Tax, Wealth Tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues, b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of income tax, wealth tax, sales tax, customs duty, excise duty and Cess were in arrears, at the year end for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

c) According to the information and explanations given to us, there are following dues of which have not been deposited on account of dispute and the same is being contested by the Company.

Srl. Name of the Nature of Amount Period to which Forum where No. Statute the Dues (in Lacs) the amount dispute is pending relates

1. Income tax Income tax 44.44 A.Y.2002-03 Company circle, Act,1961 Tirupur Hon''ble High Court of 551.09 A. Y.2009-10 Madras

2. CST Act, 1956 Central 4.87 F.Y.1993-94 Sales AnneMate Sales Jounal Tax

x) The Company does not have accumulated losses as at 31st March 2014. The Company has incurred cash loss during the financial year covered by our audit was Rs. 50.47 lacs and hence the Company has incurred cash loss of 154.42 lacs during the immediately preceding financial year.

xi) Based on our audit procedures and according to the information, the company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to Bank(s).

xii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

xiii) In our opinion, the company is not a chit fund or a Nidhi/Mutual benefit fund/ Society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.

xiv) In our opinion, the Company is not dealing in or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.

xv) During the year, the Company has not given guarantees for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions.

xvi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not borrowed any term loan during the year.

xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the Balance sheet of the company, we report that no funds raised on short time basis have been used for long term investments.

xviii) The company has issued preferential allotment of warrants to promoters with an option to exercise to convert the warrants into equity shares in the future.

xix) The company has not issued any debentures during the year.

xx) The company has not made any Public Issues during the year.

xxi) According to the information and explanations given to us, no material fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.

For M.S.Jagannathan & Visvanathan Chartered Accountants FRN 001209S

N.Rajesh Mumbai Partner 09.05.2014 (Membership No.212417)


Mar 31, 2013

Report on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying financial statement of Prime Urban Development India Limited (''the Company'') which comprise the Balance sheet as at 31st March, 2013, the Statement of Profit and Loss and the cash flow statement for the year then ended, and a summary of the significant accounting policy and other explanatory information. -

Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act"). This responsibility includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor''s Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with the ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about w! ether l; e financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risl''s of nMterial misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor cc lskiers internal control relevant to the Company''s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the financial statement1- give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31st March, 2013;

(b) in the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the Loss of the Company for the year ended on that date, and

(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows of the Company for the year ended on that date.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Act, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.

2. As required by Section 227(3) of {he Act, we report that:

(a) We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit.

(b) In our cpr.ion, proper books of account an required by law have been kept by the Company so i !r as it appears from ou; examination of those books.

(c) The Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account.

(d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Act.

(e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors, as on 31s'' March, 2013, taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March, 2013 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Act.

Annexure to the Auditor''s Report

The Annexure referred in our report to the members of Prime Urban Development India Limited for the year ended 31st March 2013, we report that:

i) a) The company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

b) As explained to us, the fixed assets are physically verified in a phased manner, which, in our opinion, is reasonable, having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets and no material discrepancies were noted on such verification.

c) During the year, the fixed assets disposed off during the year were not substantial, and therefore, do not affect the going concern assumption.

ii) a) The Inventory has been physically verified during the year by the Management. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is reasonable.

b) The procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the company and the nature of its business.

c) The company has maintained proper records of inventory. The discrepancies noticed on verification between the physical stocks and the book records were not material.

iii) a) The Company has not granted any loans secured or unsecured to firms, companies or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 and hence sub clauses b, c & d are not applicable.

b) The Company has taken advance from two parties during the pervious year and outstanding at the year end Rs.. 51,740 thousands and maximum outstanding during the year was Rs.. 53,199 thousands.

c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, other terms and conditions on which such loans have been taken from the subsidiary company covered in the Register maintained under section 301 of the Act are prima facie not prejudicial to the interest of the company;

iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there is an adequate internal control procedures commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard to purchase of inventory, fixed assets and with regard to the sale of goods and services. During the course of our Audit no major weakness has been noticed in the internal controls.

v) a) According to the information explanations given to us, we are of the opinion that the transactions that need to be entered into the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been so entered. b) In our opinion, and according to the information and explanations given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts and arrangements referred to in (v)(a) above and exceeding the value of rupees five lakhs in respect of any party during the year have been made at prices which are reasonable having regard to prevailing market prices at the relevant time.

vi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us the company has complied with the provisions of section 58A and 58AA of the Companies Act, 1956 and the companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules 1975 with regard to the deposits accepted from the public. No order has been passed by the National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any court or any other Tribunal.

vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with the size and nature of its business.

viii) The Central Government of India has not prescribed the maintenance of cost records under Section 209(1)(d) of the Act for the business activities carried out by the Company.

ix) a) The Company is regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including Provident Fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Income Tax, Investor Education protection Fund, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues. b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of income tax, wealth tax, sales tax, customs duty, excise duty and Cess were in arrears, at the year end for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

c) According to the information and explanations given to us, there are following dues of which have not been deposited on account of dispute and the same is being contested by the Company.

Sri. Name of the Nature of the Dues Amount Period to which the Forum where dispute is Statute (Rupees amount relates pending No. Thous ands)

1. Income tax Income tax 4,444 A.Y.2002-03 Company circle, Tirupur Act,1961 Hon''ble High Court of 55,109 A.Y.2009-10 Madras

2. CST Act, 1956 Central Sales Tax 487 F.Y.1993-94 Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal

x) The Company does not have accumulated losses as at 31st March 2013. The Company has incurred cash loss of Rs. 15,442 thousands during the financial year covered by our audit and the Company has incurred cash loss of Rs. 28,714 thousands during the immediately preceding financial year.

xi) Based on our audit procedures and according to the information, the company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to Financial Institutions, Banks.

xii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

xiii) In our opinion, the company is not a chit fund or a Nidhi/Mutual benefit fund/ Society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.

xiv) In our opinion, the Company is not dealing in or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.

xv) During the year, the Company has not given guarantees for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions.

xvi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not borrowed any term loan during the year.

xvii) According tn the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the Balance sheet of the company, we report that no funds raised on short time basis have been used for long term investments.

xviii) The company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties and companies covered in the Register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

xix) The company has not issued any debentures during the year.

xx) The company has not made any Public Issues during the year.

xxi) According to the information end expirations given to us, no material fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.



For M.S.Jagannathan & Visvanathan

Chartered Accountants

FRN001209S



M.J.Vijayaraaghavan

Mumbai Partner

17.05.2013 (Membership No.7534)


Mar 31, 2011

1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of M/s.PRIME URBAN DEVELOPMENT INDIA LIMITED (Formerly known as PRIME TEXTILES LIMITED) as at 31 st March 2011 and also the Profit and Loss Account and the cash flow statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto (collectively referred as the 'financial statement'). These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

3. As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 and as amended by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Amendment order, 2004 issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.

4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report that;

i) We have obtained all the information and explanations which, to the best of our knowledge and belief, were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

iii) The Financial Statements dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

iv) In our opinion, the Financial Statements dealt with by this report comply with the accounting standards referred to in sub- section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 and rules framed there under;

v) On the basis of written representations received from the directors, as on 31st March,2011 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March 2011 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;

5. In our opinion, and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said accounts read together Significant Accounting Policies and Notes to Accounts in Schedule "18" and those appearing elsewhere in the accounts give the information required by the Companies Act 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles accepted in India:

a) In the case of Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the company as at 31 st March 2011

b) In the case of Profit and Loss account Profit of the company for the year ended on that date; and

c) In case of the cash flow statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Annexure referred in our report of even date of the accounts for the year ended 31st March 2011 of M/s. PRIME URBAN DEVELOPMENT INDIA LIMITED. (Formerly known as Prime Textiles Limited)

On the basis of such checks as we considered appropriate during the course of audit, we state that:

i a) The company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

b) As explained to us, the fixed assets are physically verified in a phased manner, which, in our opinion, is reasonable, having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets and no material discrepancies were noted on such verification.

c) During the year, there was no sale of substantial part of fixed assets and hence the going concern of the Company is not affected.

ii) a) The Inventory has been physically verified during the year by the Management. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is reasonable.

b) The procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the company and the nature of its business.

c) The company has maintained proper records of inventory. The discrepancies noticed on verification between the physical stocks and the book records were not material.

iii) a) The Company has not granted any loans secured or unsecured to firms, companies or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 and hence sub clauses b, c,& d are not applicable.

b) The company has taken advance from a subsidiary company ATL Textile Processors Limited, during previous year and outstanding at the year end was Rs. 53,254 thousands, maximum outstanding during the year was Rs. 53,254 thousands.

c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, other terms and conditions on which such loans have been taken from the subsidiary company covered in the Register maintained under section 301 of the Act are prima facie not prejudicial to the interest of the company;

iv) In our opinion and according to the explanation and information given to us, there is an adequate internal control procedures commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard to purchase of inventory, fixed assets and with regard to the sale of goods and services. During the course of our Audit no major weakness has been noticed in the internal controls.

v) a) According to the information explanations given to us, we are of the opinion that the transactions that need to be entered into the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been so entered.

b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts or arrangements entered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 and exceeding the value of rupees five lakhs in respect of any party during the year have been made at prices which are reasonable having regard to prevailing market prices at the relevant time.

vi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us the company has complied with the provisions of section 58A and 58AA of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules 1975 with regard to the deposits accepted from the public. No order has been passed by the National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any court or any other Tribunal.

vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with the size and nature of its business.

viii) We have broadly reviewed the Books of Account relating to materials, labour and other items of cost maintained by the Company pursuant to the Rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under section 209(1)(d) of the Companies Act, 1956 and we are of the opinion that prima facie the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained.

ix) a) The Company is regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including Provident Fund, Employees' State Insurance, Income Tax, Investor Education protection Fund, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues.

b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of income tax, wealth tax, sales tax, customs duty, excise duty and cess were in arrears, at the year end for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

c) According to the information and explanations given to us, there are following dues of which have not been deposited on account of dispute and the same is being contested by the Company.

SI. Name of the Statute Nature of the Dues Amount No. Rs. thousands

1. Income Tax Act 1961 Income tax 4,143

2. CST Act, 1956 Central Sales Tax 487

Name of the Statute Period to which the Forum where dispute amount relates is pending

Income Tax Act 1961 A.Y. 2002-03 Hon'ble High Court of Madras

CST Act, 1956 F.Y. 1993-94 Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal

x) The Company does not have accumulated losses as at 31st March 2011 The Company has not incurred cash loss during the financial year covered by our audit and the Company has incurred cash loss of Rs. 1,76,319 thousands during the immediately preceding financial year.

xi) Based on our audit procedures and according to the information, the company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to Financial Institutions, Banks.

xii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

xiii) In our opinion, the company is not a Chit Fund or a Nidhi / Mutual Benefit fund/ Society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4 (xiii) of the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.

xiv) In our opinion, the Company is not dealing in or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the Companies (Auditor's Report) order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.

xv) During the year, the Company has not given guarantees for loans taken by others from banks.

xvi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not borrowed any term loan during the year.

xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the Balance sheet of the company, we report that no funds raised on short time basis have been used for long term investments.

xviii) The company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties and companies covered in the Register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

xix) The company has not issued any debentures during the year.

xx) The company has not made any Public Issues during the year.

xxi) No fraud on/or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the period course of our Audit.

For M.S Jagannathan & Visvanathan Chartered Accountants FRN 001209S

M.J. Vijayaraaghavan Partner Membership Number: 7534

Place : Mumbai Date : 30.06.2011


Mar 31, 2010

1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of M/s.PRIME URBAN DEVELOPMENT INDIA LIMITED (Formerly known as PRIME TEXTILES LIMITED) as at 31 st March 2010 and also the Profit and Loss Account and the cash flow statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto (collectively referred as the financial statement). These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based onouraudit.

2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our-audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 and as amended by the Companies (Auditors Report) Amendment order, 2004 issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.

Reference is invited to:

Without qualifying our opinion we draw attention to note 15 of part B - notes on accounts schedule 18 regarding the Scheme of Arrangement had financial restructuring exercise and a Scheme of Arrangement under sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956. In terms of the Scheme, the Company restated its free hold land by crediting the resulting accretion value of Rs. 24,74,868 thousands to the Business Reconstruction Reserve (BRR) Account. The Scheme has inter alia, has expenses / impairment and other adjustments from Business Reconstruction Reserve. The Scheme was approved by the Honble High Court of Madras on 22nd September, 2010 and the appointment date being 1 st of April, 2009. The Company has followed the accounting treatmentasprescribedunderthe Scheme approved by HonbleHigh Court of Madras.

4. Furtherto our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report that;

i) We have obtained all the information and explanations which, to the best of our knowledge and belief, were necessary for thepurposesofouraudit;

ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books.

iii) The Financial Statements dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account (and with the audited returns from the Branches);

iv) In our opinion, the Financial Statements dealt with by this report comply with the accounting standards referred to in sub- section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956.

v) On the basis of written representations received from the directors, as on 31st March,2010 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March 2010 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;

5. In our opinion, and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said accounts read together Significant Accounting Policies and Notes to Accounts in Schedule "18" and those appearing elsewhere in the accounts give the information required by the Companies Act 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles accepted in India:

a) In the case of Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the company as at 31 st March 2010

b) In the case of Profit and Loss account LOSS of the company for the year ended on that date; and

c) In case of the cash flow statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date;

Annexure referred in our report of even date of the accounts for the year ended 31st March 2010 of M/s. PRIME URBAN DEVELOPMENT INDIA LIMITED.

On the basis of such checks as we considered appropriate during the course of audit, we state that:

i a) The company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

b) As explained to us, the fixed assets are physically verified in a phased manner, which, in our opinion, is reasonable, having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets and no material discrepancies were noted on such verification.

c) During the year, there was no sale of substantial part of fixed assets and hence the going concern of the Company is not affected.

ii) a) The Inventory has been physically verified during the year by the Management. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is reasonable.

b) The procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the company and the nature of its business.

c) The company has maintained proper records of inventory. The discrepancies noticed on verification between the physical stocks and the book records were not material.

iii) a) The Company has not granted any loans secured or unsecured to firms, companies or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 and hence sub clauses b, c,& d are not applicable.

b) Thecompany has taken advance from a subsidiary company ATL Textile Processors Limited, during previous year and outstanding at the year end was Rs. 52,447 thousands, maximum outstanding during the year was Rs.52,465 thousands.

c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, other terms and conditions on which such loans have been taken from the subsidiary company covered in the Register maintained under section 301 of the Act are prima facie not prejudicial to the interest of the company;

iv) In our opinion and according to the explanation and information given to us, there is an adequate internal control procedures commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard to purchase of inventory, fixed assets and with regard to the sale of goods and services. During the course of our Audit no major weakness has been noticed in the internal controls.

v) a) According to the information explanations given to us, we are of the opinion thatthe transactions that need to be entered into the register maintained under section 301 of the CompaniesAct, 1956 have been so entered. b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts or arrangements entered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 and exceeding the value of rupees five lakhs in respect of any party during the year have been made at prices which are reasonable having regard to prevailing market prices at the relevant time.

vi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us the company has complied with the provisions of section 58Aand 58AAof the CompaniesAct, 1956 and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules 1975 with regard to the deposits accepted from the public. No order has been passed by the National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any court or any other Tribunal.

vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with the size and nature of its business.

viii) We have broadly reviewed the Books of Account relating to materials, labour and other items of cost maintained by the Company pursuant to the Rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under section 209( 1 )(d) of the Companies Act, 1956 and we are of the opinion that prima facie the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained.

ix) a) The Company is regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including Provident Fund, Investor Education protection Fund, Employees State Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues with the appropriate authorities.

b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of income tax, wealth tax, sales tax, customs duty, excise duty and cess were in arrears, at the year end for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

c) According to the information and explanations given to us, there are following dues of which have not been deposited on account of dispute and the same is being contested by the Company.

Sl. Name of the Statute Nature of the Dues Amount Period to which the Forum where dispute No. Rs. thousands amount relates is pending

1. Income Tax Act 1961 Income tax 4,143 A.Y. 2002-03 Honble High Court of Madras

2. CST Act, 1956 Central Sales Tax 487 F.Y. 1993-94 Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal.

x) The Company does not have accumulated losses as at 31st March 2010 The Company has incurred cash loss of Rs. 1,76,319 thousands during the financial year covered by our audit and the Company has incurred cash loss of Rs. 47,300 thousands during the immediately preceding financial year.

xi) Based on our audit procedures and according to the information, the company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to Financial Institutions/Banks.

xii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

xiii) In our opinion, the company is not a Chit Fund or a Nidhi / Mutual Benefit fund/ Society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4 (xiii) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.

xiv) In our opinion, the Company is not dealing in or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the Companies (Auditors Report) order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.

xv) During the year, the Company has not given guarantees for loans taken by others from banks.

xvi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not borrowed any term loan during the year.

xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the Balance sheet of the company, we report that no funds raised on short time basis have been used for long term investments.

xviii) The company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties and companies covered in the Register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

xix) The company has not issued any debentures during the year.

xx) The company has not made any Public Issues during the year.

xxi) No fraud on/or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the period course of our Audit.

For M.S.Jagannathan & Visvanathan

Chartered Accountants

FRN 001209S

M.J.Vijayaraaghavan

Place : Tirupur Partner

Date : 12.11.2010 Membership Number: 7534



 
Subscribe now to get personal finance updates in your inbox!