Home  »  Company  »  PVR Ltd.  »  Quotes  »  Auditor Report
Enter the first few characters of Company and click 'Go'

Auditor Report of PVR Ltd.

Mar 31, 2016

We have audited the accompanying standalone financial statements of PVR Limited ("the Company"), which comprises the Balance Sheet as at March 31, 2016, the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

MANAGEMENT''S RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company''s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act") with respect to the preparation of these standalone financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards specified under section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding of the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and the design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial control that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

AUDITOR''S RESPONSIBILITY

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these standalone financial statements based on our audit. We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made thereunder. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing, issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, as specified under Section 1 43(1 0) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant to the Company''s preparation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Company''s Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the standalone financial statements.

OPINION

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the standalone financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31, 2016, its profit, and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.

REPORT ON OTHER LEGAL AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s report) Order, 2016 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (11) of section 143 of the Act, we give in the Annexure 1, a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.

2. As required by section 143 (3) of the Act, we report that:

(a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;

(b) In our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books;

(c) The Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account

(d) In our opinion, the aforesaid standalone financial statements comply with the Accounting Standards specified under section 133 of the Act, read with Rule

7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014;

e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors as on March 31, 2016, and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2016, from being appointed as a director in terms of section 164 (2) of the Act;

(f) With respect to the adequacy of the internal financial controls over financial reporting of the Company and the operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to our separate Report in "Annexure 2" to this report;

(g) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor''s Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i. The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position in its financial statements - Refer Note 33 to the financial statements;

ii. The Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses;

iii. There were no amounts which were required to be transferred to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.

Re: PVR Limited (''the Company'')

(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) Fixed assets have been physically verified by the management during the year and no material discrepancies were identified on such verification.

(c) Based on our audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and according to information and explanations given by the management, the title deeds of immovable properties included in property, plant and equipment are held in the name of the company.

(ii) The management has conducted physical verification of inventory at reasonable intervals during the year and no material discrepancies were noticed on such physical verification.

(iii) (a) The Company has granted loans to one Company covered in the register maintained under section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the terms and conditions of the grants and loans not prejudicial to the company''s interest.

(b) The Company has granted loans that are re-payable on demand, to a company covered in the register maintained under section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013. The loans granted are re-payable on demand. We are informed that the company has not demanded repayment of any such loan during the year, and thus, there has been no default on the part of the parties to whom the money has been lent. The payment of interest has been regular.

(c) There is no amount of loans granted to companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013 which are outstanding for more than ninety days.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, provisions of section 185 and 186 of the Companies Act 2013 in respect of loans to directors including entities in which they are interested and in respect of loans and advances given, investments made and, guarantees, and securities given have been complied with by the company.

(v) The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public.

(vi) To the best of our knowledge and as explained, the Central Government has not specified the maintenance of cost records under Section 148(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, for the products/services of the Company.

(vii) (a) The Company is regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, employees'' state insurance, income- tax, sales-tax, wealth-tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty, value added tax, cess and other material statutory dues applicable to it.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of provident fund, employees'' state insurance, income- tax, service tax, sales-tax, duty of custom, duty of excise, value added tax, cess and other material statutory dues were outstanding, at the year end, for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(c) According to the records of the Company, the dues outstanding of income-tax, sales-tax, , service tax, duty of custom, duty of excise , value added tax and cess on account of any dispute, are as follows:

Name of the Statute Nature of the Dues Amount Period to which the amount relates Forum where dispute is Rs. in Lakhs pending

Income Tax Act, 1961 Disallowance of 516 2006-07, 2008-09 and 2009-10 High Court

Income Tax Act, 1961 Entertainment tax as 614 2007-11 Income Tax Appellate Capital receipt and Tribunal

Income Tax Act, 1961 other disallowance 486 2007-08, 2011-12 Commissioner of Income to 2013-14 Tax (Appeal)

Finance Act 1994, (Service Chargeability of Services 628 Various dates Customs Excise and Tax Provision) along with and disallowances of Service Tax Appellate Rules CENVAT Tribunal

UP VAT Act, 2007/ Value Added Tax 400 2006-07 to 2007-08, Joint Commissioner/

Maharashtra VAT Act, 2002 2009-10 to 2014-15 Deputy Commissioner

Maharashtra VAT Act, 2002 Value Added Tax 45 2005-06 and 2008-09 Tribunal

(viii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given by the management, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to banks and financial institution. There are no dues to any financial institutions.

(ix) According to the information and explanations given by the management, the Company has not raised any money by way of initial public offer / further public offer / debt instruments and term loans hence, reporting under clause

(ix) is not applicable to the Company and hence not commented upon.

(x) Based upon the audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and according to the information and explanations given by the management, we report that no fraud by the company or no fraud / material fraud on the Company by the officers and employees of the Company has been noticed or reported during the year.

(xi) Based on our audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and according to the information and explanations given by the management, we report that the Company has paid managerial remuneration which is over and above the amount mandated by the provisions of section 197 read with Schedule V to the Companies Act, 2013, by Rs. 235.64 lacs to Managing Director and Rs. 135.74 lacs to Joint Managing Director for the financial year 2014-15. As represented to us the Company has applied to the Central Government seeking approval for the managerial remuneration paid in excess and pending receipt of the same has not taken any steps to recover the excess amount so paid.

(xii) In our opinion, the Company is not a nidhi company. Therefore, the provisions of clause 3(xii) of the order are not applicable to the Company and hence not commented upon.

(xiii) According to the information and explanations given by the management, transactions with the related parties are in compliance with section 177 and 188 of Companies Act, 2013 where applicable and the details have been disclosed in the notes to the financial statements, as required by the applicable accounting standards.

(xiv) According to the information and explanations given by the management, the Company has complied with provisions of section 42 of the Companies Act, 2013 in respect of the preferential allotment or private placement of shares or fully or partly convertible debentures during the year. According to the information and explanations given by the management, we report that the amounts raised, have been used for the purposes for which the funds were raised.

(xv) According to the information and explanations given by the management, the Company has not entered into any non- cash transactions with directors or persons connected with him as referred to in section 192 of Companies Act, 2013.

(xvi) According to the information and explanations given to us, the provisions of section 45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 are not applicable to the Company.

For S.R. Batliboi & CO. LLP

Chartered Accountants

ICAI Firm Registration Number: 301003E/E300005



per Vikas Mehra

Partner

Membership Number: 94421

Place of Signature: Gurgaon

Date: May 27, 2016


Mar 31, 2015

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of PVR Limited ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at March 31, 2015, the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management's Responsibility for the Financial Statements

The Company's Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act") with respect to the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards specified under section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014. This responsibility includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding of the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and the design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial control that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor's Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, as specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made thereunder. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant to the Company's preparation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on whether the Company has in place an adequate internal financial controls system over financial reporting and the effectiveness of such controls. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the standalone financial statements.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31,2015, its profit and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor's report) Order, 2015 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (1 1) of section 143 of the Act, we give in the Annexure 1 a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.

2. As required by section 143 (3) of the Act, we report that:

(a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;

(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books;

(c) The Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account;

(d) In our opinion, the aforesaid financial statements comply with the Accounting Standards specified under section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014;

(e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors as on March 31, 2015, and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2015, from being appointed as a director in terms of section 164 (2) of the Act;

(f) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor's Report in accordance with Rule 1 1 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i. The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position in its financial statements - Refer Note34 to the financial statements;

ii. The Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses;

iii. There were no amounts which were required to be transferred to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.

Annexure referred to in paragraph 1 under the heading "Report on other legal and regulatory requirements" of our report of even date Re: PVR Limited ('the Company')

(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) Fixed assets have been physically verified by the management during the year in accordance with a programme of verification in a phased mannerwhich, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. Discrepancies identified during the year which were not material have been properly dealt with in the books of accounts.

(ii) (a) The management has conducted physical verification of inventory at reasonable intervals during the year.

(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business

(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory. Discrepancies noted on physical verification of inventories were not material, and have been properly dealt with in the books of account.

(iii) (a) The Company has granted unsecured loan to a wholly owned subsidiary company listed in the register maintained under section189 of the Companies Act, 2013. The maximum amount involved during the year was Rs. 400 lacs and the year-end balance of loan granted to such party is Rs. 200 lacs.

(b) The loan granted are re-payable on demand. As informed, the Company has not demanded repayment of any such loan during the year, thus, there has been no default on the part of the parties to whom the money has been lent. For loans granted since April 1, 2014 was interest bearing for which payment of interest has been received during the year.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us and having regard to the explanation that purchases of items of inventories and certain fixed assets are of proprietary nature for which alternative sources are not available to obtain comparable quotations, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business, for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any major weakness or continuing failure to correct any major weakness in the internal control system of the Company in respect of these areas.

(v) The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public.

(vi) To the best of our knowledge and as explained, the Central Government has not specified the maintenance of cost records under section clause 148(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, for the products/services of the Company.

(vii) (a) The Company is generally regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, employees' state insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, wealth-tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty, value added tax, cess and other material statutory dues applicable to it.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of provident fund, employees' state insurance, income-tax, wealth-tax, service tax, sales-tax, customs duty, excise duty,value added tax, cess and other material statutory dues were outstanding, at the year end, for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(c) According to the information and explanations given to us, there are no dues of income tax, sales-tax, wealth tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty,value added tax and cess which have not been deposited on account of any dispute, except as follows:

Name of the Nature of the Amount statute dues Rs. in Lacs



Income Tax Disallowance of 433 Act, 1961 Entertainment tax as Capital receipt and other disallowance

Income Tax 614 Act, 1961

Income Tax 126 Act, 1961

Finance Act 1994 Chargeability of 628 (Service Tax Provision) services and along with Rules disallowances of CENVAT

UP VAT Act, 2007/ Value added tax 125 Maharashtra VAT Act, 2002

Maharashtra VAT Value added tax 39 Act, 2002

Name of the Period to which Forum where statute the amount dispute is relates pending

Income Tax 2006-07, 2008-09 High Court Act, 1961 and 2009-10

Income Tax 2007-11 Income Tax Act, 1961 Appellate Tribunal

Income Tax 2007-08, 2011-12 Commissioner of Act, 1961 and 2012-13 Income Tax (Appeal)

Finance Act 1994 Various dates Custom Excise and (Service Tax Provision) Service Tax Appellate along with Rules Tribunal

UP VAT Act, 2007/ 2006-07, 2007-08, Joint Commissioner/ Maharashtra VAT 2010-12 and Deputy Commissioner Act, 2002 2013-14

Maharashtra VAT 2005-06 to Tribunal Act, 2002 2008-09

(d) There were no amounts which were

required to be transferred to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) and rules made thereunder.

(viii) The Company has no accumulated losses at the end of the financial year and it has not incurred cash losses in the current and immediately preceding financial year.

(ix) Based on our audit procedures and as per the information and explanations given by the management, we are of the opinion that the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to banks or debenture holders, there are no dues to any financial institutions.

(x) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from bank or financial institutions.

(xi) Based on the information and explanations given to us by the management, term loans were applied for the purpose for which the loans were obtained.

(xii) Based upon the audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and as per the information and explanations given by the management, we report that no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.

For S.R. Batliboi & Co. LLP Chartered Accountants ICAI Firm Registration No. 301003E

per Vikas Mehra Partner Membership No.: 94421 Place of Signature : Gurgaon Date :May 29, 2015


Mar 31, 2014

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of PVR Limited ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at March 31, 2014, and the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards notified under the Companies Act, I956, read with General Circular 8/2014 dated 4 April 2014 issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs. This responsibility includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor''s Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Company''s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity''s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31, 2014;

(b) in the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the profit for the year ended on that date; and

(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Act, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.

2. As required by section 227(3) of the Act, we report that:

(a) We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;

(b) In our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

(c) The Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account;

(d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards notified under the Companies Act, I956, read with General Circular 8/20I4 dated 4 April 20I4 issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs;

(e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors as on March 3I, 20I4, and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on March 3I, 2014, from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (I) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.

Annexure referred to in paragraph [1] under the heading

"Report on other legal and regulatory requirements" of our report of even date

Re: PVR Limited (''the Company'')

(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) All fixed assets have not been physically verified by the management during the year but there is a regular programme of verification which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

(c) Fixed Assets disposed off during the year were not substantial, and therefore, do not affect the going concern assumption.

(ii) (a) The management has conducted physical verification of inventory at reasonable intervals during the year.

(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory. Discrepancies noted on physical verification of inventories were not material, and have been properly dealt with in the books of account.

(iii) (a) The Company has granted loan to two firms covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The maximum amount involved during the year was Rs 831 lakhs and the year-end balance of loans granted to such parties was Rs 200 lakhs.

(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions for such loans are not prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the Company. For the interest-free loan granted to a wholly-owned subsidiary, according to the information and explanation given to us, and having regard to the management''s representation that the interest free loan are given to wholly-owned subsidiaries of the company in the nature of the Company''s business, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions for such loans are not prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

(c) The loans granted are re-payable on demand. As informed, the Company has not demanded repayment of any such loan during the year, thus, there has been no default on the part of the parties to whom the money has been lent. Since interest free loans were granted, no payment of interest has been received during the year.

(d) There is no overdue amount of loans granted to companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(e) According to information and explanations given to us, the Company has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured, from companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(iii)(e) to (g) of the Order are not applicable to the Company and hence not commented upon.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us and having regard to the explanation that purchases of items of inventories and certain fixed assets are of proprietary nature for which alternative sources are not available to obtain comparable quotations, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business, for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any major weakness or continuing failure to correct any major weakness in the internal control system of the Company in respect of these areas.

(v) (a) According to the information and explanations provided by the management, we are of the opinion that the particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to in section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 that need to be entered into the register maintained under section 301 have been so entered.

(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or arrangements and exceeding the value of Rupees five lakhs have been entered into during the financial year at prices which are reasonable having regard to the prevailing market prices at the relevant time.

(vi) The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public.

(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with the size of the Company and nature of its business.

(viii) To the best of our knowledge and as explained, the Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost records under clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 209 of the Companies Act, 1956, for the products of the Company.

(ix) (a) The Company is regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor education and protection fund, employees'' state insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, wealth-tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty, cess and other material statutory dues applicable to it.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of provident fund, investor education and protection fund, employees'' state insurance, income- tax, wealth-tax, service tax, sales-tax, customs duty, excise duty cess and other material statutory dues were outstanding, at the year end, for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(c) According to the records of the Company, the dues outstanding of income-tax, sales- tax, wealth-tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty and cess on account of any dispute, are as follows:

Name of the Nature of Amount statute dues (Rs. in lakhs) Income Tax Income Tax 1228.76 Act, 1961 Finance Act 1994, Service Tax 317.28 (Service Tax Provision) along with rules

Finance Act 1994, Service Tax 202.31 (Service Tax Provision) along with rules

Delhi VAT Act, Value added tax 80.98 2004

Tamilnadu VAT Value added tax 46.75 Act, 2006 (CT)

UP VAT Act, 2007 Value added tax 11.66 Maharashtra VAT Value added tax 64.37 Act, 2002

Name of the Period to which Forum to where

statute the amount dispute is

relates pending

Income Tax Assessment Years High Court, Income Tax

Act, 1961 2006-07, 2007-08, Appellate Tribunal and

2008-09, 2009-10 Commissioner of 2010-11 Income Tax (Appeals)

Finance Act 1994, Various dates Customs Excise and (Service Tax Serrvice Tax Provision) along Appellate Tribunal with rules

Finance Act 1994, Various dates Additional (Service Tax Commissioner Provision) along with rules

Delhi VAT Act, 2006-07 VAT Officer and 2004 VAT Tribunal

Tamilnadu VAT 2013-14 Joint Commissioner Act, 2006 (CT)

UP VAT Act, 2007 2010-11 Additional Commissoner- Grade-2 (Appeals)

Maharashtra VAT 2005-06 to Joint Commissioner Act, 2002 2008-09 (Appeals)

(x) The Company has no accumulated losses at the end of the financial year and it has not incurred cash losses in the current and immediately preceding financial year.

(xi) Based on our audit procedures and as per the information and explanations given by the management, we are of the opinion that the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to a financial institution, bank or debenture holders.

(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us and based on the documents and records produced before us, the Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

(xiii) In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/ mutual benefit fund/ society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 (as amended) are not applicable to the Company.

(xiv) In respect of dealing in mutual funds, in our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, proper records have been maintained of the transactions and contracts and timely entries have been made therein. The units have been held by the Company in its own name.

(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company had given guarantee for loans taken by a wholly owned subsidiary company from bodies corporate, the terms and conditions whereof, in our opinion, are not prima-facie prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

(xvi) Based on the information and explanations given to us by the management, term loans were applied for the purpose for which the loans were obtained.

(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and based on overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, we report that short term funds amounting to Rs. 14700 lakhs (primarily representing increase in capital creditors and operational creditors and short term borrowings) has been used for payment of long term deposits and purchase of fixed assets.

(xviii) The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties or companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(xix) The Company has secured debentures outstanding as at the year end. The Company has created security or charge in respect of debentures issued as per the terms of the agreement with debenture holders.

(xx) The Company has not raised any money through a public issue during the year.

(xxi) Based upon the audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and as per the information and explanations given by the management, we report that no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.

For S.R. BATLIBOI & CO. LLP Chartered Accountants ICAI Firm''s registration number: 30I003E

per Vikas Mehra Partner Membership No.: 9442I

Place: Gurgaon Date: May 29th, 2014


Mar 31, 2013

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of PVR Limited ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at March 31, 2013, and the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards referred to in sub- section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act"). This responsibility includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor''s Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Company''s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31, 2013;

(b) in the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the profit for the year ended on that date; and

(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Emphasis of Matter

We draw attention to note no. 38 of payment of managerial remuneration to the Managing Director, Mr. Ajay Bijli for earlier years from 2008 to 2011 which is in excess of the approval granted by Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Central Government (CG) by Rs. 11,875,097. As represented by the Company, it has filed an application in respect of the aforesaid matter with the CG for waiver of excess remuneration paid. Pending the final outcome of the Company''s representations, no adjustments have been made to these financial statements. Our opinion is not qualified in respect of this matter.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Act, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.

2. As required by section 227(3) of the Act, we report that:

(a) We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;

(b) In our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

(c) The Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account;

(d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards referred to in subsection (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956;

(e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors as on March 31, 2013, and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2013, from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub- section (I) of section 274 of the Companies Act, I956.

Re: PVR Limited (''the Company'')

(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) All fixed assets have not been physically verified by the management during the year but there is a regular programme of verification which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. As informed, no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

(c) There was no disposal of substantial part fixed assets during the year.

(ii) (a) The management has conducted physical verification of inventory at reasonable intervals during the year.

(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

(c) The company is maintaining proper records of inventory. Discrepancies noted on physical verification of inventories were not material and have been properly dealt with in the books of account.

(iii) (a) The Company has granted interest free loan to two companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The maximum amount involved during the year was Rs I49,600,000 and the year-end balance of loans granted to such parties was Rs 83,100,000.

(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions for such loans are not prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the Company. For the interest-free loan granted during the year to a wholly-owned subsidiary, according to the information and explanations given to us, and having regard to management''s representation that the interest free loans are given to wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company in the interest of the Company''s business, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions for such loans are not prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

(c) The loans granted are re-payable on demand. As informed, the Company has not demanded repayment of any such loan during the year, thus, there has been no default on the part of the parties to whom the money has been lent. Since interest free loans were granted, no payment of interest has been received during the year.

(d) There is no overdue amount of loans granted to companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(e) According to information and explanations given to us, the Company has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured, from companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(iii)(e) to (g) of the Order are not applicable to the Company and hence not commented upon.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of its business, for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any major weakness or continuing failure to correct any major weakness in the internal control system of the company in respect of these areas.

(v) (a) According to the information and explanations provided by the management, we are of the opinion that the particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to in section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 that need to be entered into the register maintained under section 30I have been so entered.

(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or arrangements and exceeding the value of Rs. 500,000 have been entered into during the financial year at prices which are reasonable having regard to the prevailing market prices at the relevant time.

(vi) The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public.

(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with the size and nature of its business.

(viii) To the best of our knowledge and as explained, the Central Government has not prescribed maintenance of cost records under clause (d) of sub-section (I) of section 209 of the Companies Act, I956 for the products of the Company.

(ix) (a) The Company is generally regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor education and protection fund, employees'' state insurance, income-tax, wealth tax, sales-tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty and other material statutory dues applicable to it.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of provident fund, investor education and protection fund, employees'' state insurance, income- tax, wealth-tax, service tax, sales-tax, customs duty, excise duty, cess and other material statutory dues were outstanding, at the year end, for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(c) According to the records of the Company, the dues outstanding of income-tax, sales- tax, wealth-tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty and cess on account of any dispute, are as follows:

Name of the Nature of Amount statute dues (Rs. in Crores)

Income Tax Income Tax *51,581,201 Act, 1961

Finance Act 1994, Service Tax 31,728,300 (Service Tax Provission) along with rules

Finance Act 1994, Service Tax 20,231,146 (Service Tax Provission) along with rules

103,540,647

Name of the Statute Period to which Forum where the amount dispute is relates pending

Income Tax Act, 1961 Assessment Years High Court, Income Tax 2006-7, 2007-08, Appellate Tribunal and 2008-09, 2009-10 Commissioner of and 2010-11 Income Tax (Appeals)

Finance Act 1994 Various dates Customs Excise and Serrvice Tax Appellate Tribunal

Finance Act 1994 Various dates Additional Commissioner

* Net of Rs. 96,242,608 paid under protest

(x) The Company has no accumulated losses at the end of the financial year and it has not incurred cash losses in the current and immediately preceding financial year.

(xi) Based on our audit procedures and as per the information and explanations given by the management, we are of the opinion that the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to a financial institution, banks or debenture holders.

(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us and based on the documents and records produced to us, the Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

(xiii) In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi / mutual benefit fund / society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 (as amended) are not applicable to the Company.

(xiv) In respect of dealing in mutual funds, in our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, proper records have been maintained of the transactions and contracts and timely entries have been made therein. The units have been held by the Company in its own name.

(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company had given guarantee for loans taken by a wholly owned subsidiary company from bodies corporate, the terms and conditions whereof in our opinion are not prima- facie prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

(xvi) Based on the information and explanations given to us by the management, term loans were applied for the purpose for which the loans were obtained.

(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, we report that no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term investment.

(xviii) The Company has made preferential allotment of shares to parties and companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. In our opinion, the price at which shares have been issued is not prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

(xix) The Company has secured debentures outstanding as at the year end. The Company has created security or charge in respect of debentures issued as per the terms of the agreement with debenture holders

(xx) The Company has not raised any money through a public issue during the year.

(xxi) Based upon the audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and as per the information and explanations given by the management, we report that no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.

For S.R. BATLIBOI & CO. LLP

Chartered Accountants

Firm''s registration number: 30I003E

perVikas Mehra

Partner

Membership No.: 9442I

Place: Gurgaon

Date: May 28th, 2013


Mar 31, 2012

1. We have audited the attached balance sheet of PVR Limited ('the Company') as at March 31, 2012 and also the statement of profit and loss account and the cash flow statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

3. As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 (as amended) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.

4. Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to the following:

(a) Note 44(ii) to these financial statements regarding writing down the value of certain assets of the Company pursuant to a composite scheme of arrangement (referred to as 'Scheme', also refer Note 44(i) for details) by Rs 493,738,033 (net of tax impact); and setting off the same against the Reserves of the Company including Securities Premium as prescribed in the Scheme as approved by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi vide order dated February 2, 2012 effective from April 1, 2011. Such treatment for utilization of Reserves including Securities Premium for setting off the values of certain assets is in accordance with Scheme as approved by Hon'ble High Court.

(b) Note No. 41 to these financial statements wherein it is stated that Company has during the year ended March 31, 2011 paid managerial remuneration to Mr. Ajay Bijli which is in excess of the approval granted by Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Central Government (CG) by Rs. 4,018,000. In the previous years, the Company had paid managerial remuneration to Mr. Ajay Bijli in excess of the approval granted by Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Central Government by Rs. 7,857,097. As represented by the Company, it has filed an application in the aforesaid matter with the CG for waiver of excess remuneration paid. Pending the final outcome of the Company's representations, no adjustments have been made to the financial statements.

5. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report that:

i. We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

ii. In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

iii. The balance sheet, statement of profit and loss account and cash flow statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

iv. In our opinion, the balance sheet, statement of profit and loss account and cash flow statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956.

v. On the basis of the written representations received from the directors, as on March 31, 2012, and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2012 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.

vi. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India;

a) in the case of the balance sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31, 2012;

b) in the case of the statement of profit and loss account, of the profit for the year ended on that date; and

c) in the case of cash flow statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Annexure referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date Re: PVR Limited ('the Company')

(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) All fixed assets have not been physically verified by the management during the year but there is a regular programme of verification which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

(c) There was no substantial disposal of fixed assets during the year.

(ii) (a) The management has conducted physical verification of inventory at reasonable intervals during the year.

(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.

(iii) (a) The Company has in the earlier years granted loan to one Company covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The maximum amount involved during the year was Rs. 596,902,802 and the loan has been squared off during the year. Further during the year, the Company has granted loan to one Company covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The maximum amount involved during the year was Rs. 50,000,000 and the year-end balance is Rs 50,000,000.

(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions for loans granted in earlier years are not prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the Company. For the interest-free loan granted during the year to a wholly-owned subsidiary, according to the information and explanations given to us, and having regard to management's representation that the interest free loans are given to wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company in the interest of the Company's business, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions for such loans are not prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

(c) The loans granted are re-payable on demand. As informed, the Company has not demanded repayment of any such loan during the year, thus, there has been no default on the part of the parties to whom the money has been lent. The payment of interest has been regular.

(d) There is no overdue amount of loans granted to companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(e) According to information and explanations given to us, the Company has taken a loan of Rs 350,000,000 from a Company covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The maximum amount involved during the year was Rs 350,000,000 and the year-end balance of loan taken from such party was Rs Nil.

(f) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions for such loans are not prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the Company

(g) The loans taken are re-payable on demand. The loan has been repaid/adjusted during the year.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business, for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any major weakness or continuing failure to correct any major weakness in the internal control system of the company in respect of these areas.

(v) (a) According to the information and explanations provided by the management, we are of the opinion that the particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to in section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 that need to be entered into the register maintained under section 301 have been so entered.

(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or arrangements exceeding value of Rupees five lakhs have been entered into during the financial year at prices which are reasonable having regard to the prevailing market prices at the relevant time.

(vi) The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public.

(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with the size and nature of its business.

(viii) To the best of our knowledge and as explained, the Central Government has not prescribed maintenance of cost records under clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 209 of the Companies Act, 1956 for the products of the Company.

(ix) (a) The Company is generally regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor education and protection fund, employees' state insurance, income- tax, wealth tax, sales-tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty and other material statutory dues applicable to it.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of provident fund, investor education and protection fund, employees' state insurance, income-tax, wealth- tax, service tax, sales-tax, customs duty, excise duty, cess and other material statutory dues were outstanding, at the year end, for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(c) According to the records of the Company, the dues outstanding of income-tax, sales-tax, wealth-tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty and cess on account of any dispute, are as follows:

Name of the Nature of Amount Period to which Forum where statute dues (Rs. in Crores) the amount dispute is relates pending

Income Tax Income Tax *41,496,814 Assessment Years IncomeTax Appellate Act, 1961 2006-7, 2007-08, Tribunal and 2008-09 Commissioner of and 2009-10 Income Tax (Appeals)

41,496,814

* Net of Rs. 96,242,608 paid under protest and disclosed in Schedule 15 Loans and Advances

(x) The Company has no accumulated losses at the end of the financial year and it has not incurred cash losses in the current and immediately preceding financial year.

(xi) Based on our audit procedures and as per the information and explanations given by the management, we are of the opinion that the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to a financial institution, banks or debenture holders.

(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us and based on the documents and records produced to us, the Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

(xiii) In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi / mutual benefit fund / society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 (as amended) are not applicable to the Company.

(xiv) In respect of dealing/trading in mutual funds, securities and other investments, in our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, proper records have been maintained of the transactions and contracts and timely entries have been made therein. The units and securities have been held by the Company in its own name except for Rs 6,488,000.

(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company had given guarantee for loans taken by a subsidiary company from a financial institution; the terms and conditions whereof in our opinion are not prima-facie prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

(xvi) Based on the information and explanations given to us by the management, term loans were applied for the purpose for which the loans were obtained.

(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, we report that funds raised on short term basis have not been used for long-term investment.

(xviii) The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties or companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(xix) The Company has secured debentures outstanding as at the year end. The Company has created security or charge in respect of debentures issued.

(xx) The Company has not raised any money through a public issue during the year.

(xxi) Based upon the audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and as per the information and explanations given by the management, we report that no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.

For S.R. BATLIBOI & CO.

Firm's registration number: 301003E Chartered Accountants

per Vikas Mehra

Partner

Membership No.: 94421

Place: Gurgaon Date : May 29th, 2012


Mar 31, 2011

1. We have audited the attached balance sheet of PVR Limited (the Company) as at March 31, 2011 and also the profit and loss account and the cash flow statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 (as amended) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.

4. Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to the following:

(a) Note 7 of Schedule 22 of the financial statements, wherein as per requirements of the Finance Act 2010, the Company may be liable to pay service tax in respect of renting of immovable properties as lessee of such properties. The Company has challenged the impugned provisions of law by way of a writ petition filed with the Honble High Court of Delhi and an interim stay order is obtained. The Company has also been legally advised that no Service Tax is payable on renting of immovable properties as lessee of such properties. Pending the final outcome of this matter, no provision for service tax liability amounting to Rs. 141,624,348 (including Rs. 87,303,515 pertaining to earlier years) (net of service tax credit claimable) has been made.

(b) Note No. 22.1 of Schedule 22 of the financial statements, the Company has during the year ended March 31, 2011 paid managerial remuneration to Mr. Ajay Bijli which is in excess of the approval granted by Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Central Government (CG) by Rs. 1,628,903. In the previous years, the Company had paid managerial remuneration in excess of the approval granted by Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Central Government by Rs. 6,848,852 paid to Mr. Ajay Bijli. The Company has filed representations in the matter with the CG and a separate representation is being filed with CG for waiver of excess remuneration of Rs. 1,628,903 paid to Mr. Ajay Bijli during the financial year 2010-11. Pending the final outcome of the Companys representations, no adjustments have been made to the accompanying financial statements in this regard.

5. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report that:

i. We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

ii. In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

iii. The balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash flow statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

iv. In our opinion, the balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash flow statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956.

v. On the basis of the written representations received from the directors, as on March 31, 2011, and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2011 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.

vi. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India;

a) in the case of the balance sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31, 2011;

b) in the case of the profit and loss account, of the profit for the year ended on that date; and

c) in the case of cash flow statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Re: PVR Limited (the Company)

(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) All fixed assets have not been physically verified by the management during the year but there is a regular programme of verification which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

(c) There was no substantial disposal of fixed assets during the year.

(ii) (a) The management has conducted physical verification of inventory at reasonable intervals during the year.

(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.

(iii) (a) The Company has granted loan to one company covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The maximum amount involved during the year was Rs. 670,608,652 and the year end balance of loan granted to such party was Rs. 596,902,802.

(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions for such loans are not prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

(c) The loans granted are re-payable on demand. As informed, the Company has not demanded repayment of any such loan during the year, thus, there has been no default on the part of the parties to whom the money has been lent. The payment of interest has been regular.

(d) There is no overdue amount of loans granted to companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(e) According to information and explanations given to us, the Company has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured, from companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(iii)(e) to (g) of the Order are not applicable to the Company and hence not commented upon.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business, for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any major weakness or continuing failure to correct major weakness in internal control system of the company in respect of these areas.

(v) (a) According to the information and explanations provided by the management, we are of the opinion that the particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to in Section 301 of the companies Act, 1956 that need to be entered into the register maintained under Section 301 have been so entered.

(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or arrangements exceeding value of Rupees five lakhs have been entered into during the financial year at prices which are reasonable having regard to the prevailing market prices at the relevant time.

(vi) The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public.

(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with the size and nature of its business.

(viii) To the best of our knowledge and as explained, the Central Government has not prescribed maintenance of cost records under clause (d) of sub-Section (1) of Section 209 of the Companies Act, 1956 for the products of the Company.

(ix)(a) The Company is generally regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor education and protection fund, employees state insurance, income- tax, wealth tax, sales-tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty and other material statutory dues applicable to it.

Further, since the Central Government has till date not prescribed the amount of cess payable under Section 441 A of the Companies Act, 1956, we are not in a position to comment upon the regularity or otherwise of the Company in depositing the same.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of provident fund, investor education and protection fund, employees state insurance, income-tax, wealth- tax, service tax, sales-tax, customs duty, excise duty, cess and other material statutory dues were outstanding, at the year end, for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(c) According to the records of the Company, the dues outstanding of income-tax, sales-tax, wealth-tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty and cess on account of any dispute, are as follows:

Name of the Nature of Amount Period to which Forum where

statute dues (Rs. in Crores) the amount dispute is

relates pending

Income Tax Income Tax *4.10 Assessment Years IncomeTax Appellate Act, 1961 2006-07,

2007-08 Tribunal and

and 2008-09 Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)

4.10

* Net of Rs. 7.32 Crores paid under protest and disclosed in Schedule 13 Loans and Advances.

(x) The Company has no accumulated losses at the end of the financial year and it has not incurred cash losses in the current and immediately preceding financial year.

(xi) Based on our audit procedures and as per the information and explanations given by the management, we are of the opinion that the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to a financial institution, banks or debenture holders.

(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us and based on the documents and records produced to us, the Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

(xiii) In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi / mutual benefit fund / society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 (as amended) are not applicable to the Company.

(xiv) In respect of dealing/trading in mutual funds, in our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, proper records have been maintained of the transactions and contracts and timely entries have been made therein. The units and securities have been held by the Company in its own name except for Rs. 5,413,000.

(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company had given guarantee for loans taken by a subsidiary company from a financial institution, the terms and conditions whereof in our opinion are not prima-facie prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

(xvi) Based on the information and explanations given to us by the management, term loans were applied for the purpose for which the loans were obtained.

(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, we report that no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term investment.

(xviii) The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties or companies covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(xix) The Company has secured debentures outstanding as at the year end. The Company has created security or charge in respect of debentures issued.

(xx) The Company has not raised any money through a public issue during the year.

(xxi) Based upon the audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and as per the information and explanations given by the management, we report that no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.

For S.R. Batliboi & Co.

Firm registration number: 301003E

Chartered Accountants

per Yogender Seth

Partner

Membership No.: 94524

Place : Gurgaon

Date : May 27th, 2011


Mar 31, 2010

We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Lotus Chocolate Company Limited as at March 31, 2010 and the Profit and Loss Account and the cash flow statement for the year ended on that date. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We report as follows:

1. We conducted the audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the manage- ment, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

2. The Company has not provided the interest of Rs 38,10,559/- on over-due Deferred Sales Tax Loan for the year, as detailed in Note No. 6. Total accumulated liability of interest amounting to Rs. 1,27,99,548/- on over-due deferred Sales Tax is not provided in the books of account. This has an effect of overstatement of profit for the year by Rs. 38,10,559/- and understatement of accumu- lated loss and liabilities by Rs. 1,27,99,548/- as at 31-03-2010.

3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 issued and subsequently amended by the Central Government in exercise of the power conferred by section 227(4A) of the Companies Act, 1956 and according to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of such checks as we considered appropriate, we enclose in the Annexure, a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said order.

4. Subject to our remarks in paragraph 2 and the annexure referred to in paragraph 3, we report:

(i) We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;

(ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far it appears from our examination of such books;

(iii) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

(iv) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow statement dealt with by this report comply with the Accounting Standards referred to in section 211 (3C) of the Com- panies Act, 1956;

(v) On the basis of the written representation received from the directors, and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March 2010 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of subsection (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;

(vi) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said accounts, read together with notes thereon, give the information required by the Com- panies Act, 1956 in the manner so required and, give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India;

(a) in the case of Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31, 2010,

(b) in the case of Profit and Los Account, of the profit for the year ended on that date, and (c) in the case of Cash Flow statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Ref: LOTUS CHOCOLATE COMPANY LIMITED ANNEXURE REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH 3 OF AUDITORS REPORT OF EVEN DATE

(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) The Company has a phased programme of physical verification of Fixed Assets which in our opinion is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and nature of its business. No material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

(c) The Company has not disposed off Fixed Assets during the period, which affects the going concern concept.

(ii) (a) As explained to us, all the inventory of the Company except stock-in-process has been physi- cally verified by the management at the year-end. Stock-in-process has been taken as per the managements technical estimate. In our opinion and according to the information and explana- tions given to us, the frequency of the verification is reasonable.

(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management and read with our comments in paragraph (ii) (a) above, are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and nature of its business.

(c) On the basis of examination of the records of inventory and according to the information and explanations given to us, we are of the opinion that the Company is maintaining proper records of inventory. Discrepancies noticed on physical verification of stocks were not material.

(iii) (a) On the basis of examination of records and according to the information and explanation given to us, the Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured, to companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(b) On the basis of examination of records and according to the information and explanation given to us, the Company has taken unsecured loans from two parties covered in the register main- tained under section 301 of companies Act, 1956. The maximum amount at any time during the year was Rs.544.79 Lakhs and year-end balance outstanding was "Nil".

(c) In our opinion, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions on which loans taken are not prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

(d) The Company has repaid the loans along with interest thereon during the year.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and nature of its business with regard to the purchase of inventories and fixed assets and with regard to the sale of goods and services. In our opinion, and according to the information and explanation given to us, there is no continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in the internal control system.

(v) (a) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to in section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been entered in the register required to be maintained under that section.

(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts and arrangements referred to in (a) above and exceeding the value of Rs. 5 lakhs with any party during the year have been made at prices which are reason- able having regard to the prevailing market prices at the relevant time.

(vi) The Company has not accepted any deposits under section 58A or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and rules framed there under.

(vii) In our opinion, Company has internal audit system commensurate with the size and nature of its business.

(viii) The Central Government has not prescribed maintenance of cost records under section 209(1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 for the products of the Company;

(ix) (a) According to the records of the Company and the information and explanations given to us, the Company is regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues includ- ing Provident Fund, Employees State Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other statutory dues applicable to it.

(b) According to records of the Company and the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty and Cess were outstanding as at 31st March, 2010 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(c) According to the records of the Company and as per the information and explanations given to us by the management, the details of disputed statutory dues which have not been deposited are as given below:

Name of Amount Period towhich Forum where

Statute Nature of dues (RS in Lakhs) it relates pending

Customs Customs Duty 319.04 1996-1997 High Court, Chennai

Customs Customs Duty 180.00 1996-1997 Appellate Tribunal, Chennai

(x) The Company is a Sick Industrial Company within the meaning of clause (o) of sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions), Act, 1985. However the Company has not incurred any cash losses during the financial year and immediately preceding financial year.

(xi) Based on our examination of documents and records and according to the information and explana- tions given to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to financial institutions and banks.

(xii) Based on our examination of documents and records and according to the information and explana- tions given to us, the Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of the pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

(xiii) The Company is not a chit fund or nidhi/ mutual benefit fund/society. Therefore, the provisions of the clause 4(xiii) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.

(xiv) The Company is not dealing in or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.

(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not given any guaran- tee for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions.

(xvi) The Company has not taken any term loan during the year.

(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the Company, we report that no funds raised on a short-term basis have been used for long-term investments.

(xviii)The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties and Companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 during the year.

(xix) According to the information and explanations given to us and the records examined by us, no debentures have been issued during the year. Accordingly, provisions of Clause 4(xix) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

(xx) Based on the records examined by us, the Company has not raised monies by public issue during the year.

(xxi) During the course of our examination of books of account carried out in accordance with generally accepted practices in India, we have neither come across any incidence of fraud on or by the Com- pany nor have we been informed of any such case by the management.

For S.R. Mohan & Co.,

Chartered Accountants

Sd/-

Place : Hyderabad B. Brahmanandam, Partner

Date : August 13, 2010 Membership No. 020026



 
Subscribe now to get personal finance updates in your inbox!