Home  »  Company  »  Raghunath Intern  »  Quotes  »  Auditor Report
Enter the first few characters of Company and click 'Go'

Auditor Report of Raghunath International Ltd.

Mar 31, 2014

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Raghunath International Limited, ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at March 31, 2014, and the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act"). This responsibility includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditors'' Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditors'' judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Company''s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

a) In the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31, 2014;

b) In the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss of the loss for the year ended on that date; and

c) In the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditors'' Report) Order, 2003 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Act, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.

2. As required by section 227(3) of the Act, we report that:

a) we have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;

b) in our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books [and proper returns adequate for the purposes of our audit have been received from branches not visited by us];

c) the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account [and with the returns received from branches not visited by us];

d) in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards referred to in subsection (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956;

e) on the basis of written representations received from the directors as on March 31, 2014, and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31,2014, from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;

f) Since the Central Government has not issued any notification as to the rate at which the cess is to be paid under section 441A of the Companies Act, 1956 nor has it issued any Rules under the said section, prescribing the manner in which such cess is to be paid, no cess is due and payable by the Company.

ANNEXURE REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH 1 OF REPORT ON OTHER LEGAL AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT OF EVEN DATE TO THE MEMBERS OF RAGHUNATH INTERNATIONAL LIMITED ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2014

(i) (a) The company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) We have been informed that the fixed assets of the company are physically verified by the management according to a phased program designed to cover all the items over a period of three years, which in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the company and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

(c) During the year, the Company has not disposed off any Fixed Asset.

(ii) (a) The inventory of the company has been physically verified during the year by the management. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is reasonable.

(b) In our opinion, the procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the company and the nature of its business.

(c) The company has maintained proper records of inventory. As explained to us, there were no material discrepancies noticed on physical verification of inventory as compared to the book records.

(iii) As informed, the company has neither granted nor taken any loan, secured or unsecured to/from companies, firm or other parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of The Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, provisions of the paragraphs 4(iii) (a) to (g) of CARO are not applicable to the company.

(iv) There is adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of its business with regard to the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services. Further, on the basis of our examination of the books and records of the company, and according to the information and explanations given to us, we have neither come across nor have we been informed of any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in the aforesaid internal control system.

(v) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there are no contracts or arrangements referred to in section 301 of The Companies Act, 1956 that need to be entered in the register required to be maintained under that section. Accordingly, provisions of the paragraphs 4(v) (a) and (b) of CARO are not applicable to the company.

(vi) As informed, the Company has not accepted any deposits from the public during the year within the meaning of section 58A and 58AA of The Companies Act, 1956 and the rules framed there under and no order in this respect in the case of the company has been passed by the Company Law Board or Company Law Tribunal or The Reserve Bank of India or any court or any other tribunal.

(vii) The company has internal audit system commensurate with the size and nature of its business.

(viii) According to the information and explanation given to us, the Central Government has not prescribed for the maintenance of cost records under Section 209(1) (d) of The Companies Act, 1956 for any of its product. Accordingly, provisions of the paragraphs 4(vii) of CARO are not applicable to the company.

(ix) (a) According to the books and records as produced and examined by us in accordance with generally accepted auditing practices in India and also based on management representations, undisputed statutory dues, if applicable, in respect of Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees'' State Insurance dues, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues with the appropriate authorities have generally been regularly deposited by the company subject to the following:.

i) The company has deposited the liability of Service Tax in due time during the financial year. The company has not produced before us any statutory record pertaining to service tax such as Service Tax Returns. However, on the basis of examination of the books of the accounts of the company, there was no amount remaining outstanding as at the last day of the financial year, for a period of more than six month from the date they became payable.

(b) According to the information and explanation given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of Provident Fund, Employees'' State Insurance dues, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Income Tax, Wealth Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Service Tax, VAT, Cess and other undisputed statutory dues were outstanding, at the year end, for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(c) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has paid all undisputed dues of excise duty. However, the following are the particulars of disputed dues in respect of Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty and Cess:

(x) The company does not have accumulated losses as at March 31, 2014, however, it has incurred cash loss of Rs. Nil out of the total loss of Rs.123,556.88 during the financial year ended on that date and it has incurred cash loss of Rs. 684,296.34, out of total loss of Rs. 1,349,141.34 in the immediately preceding financial year.

(xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not defaulted in repayment of its dues to any financial institution or bank. The company has not raised any sum by issue of debentures.

(xii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities. Accordingly, provisions of the paragraphs 4(xii) of CARO are not applicable to the company.

(xiii) In our opinion, considering the nature of activities carried on by the company during the year, the provisions of any special statute applicable to Chit Fund/ Nidhi/ Mutual Benefit Fund/ Society are not applicable to it. Accordingly, provisions of the paragraphs 4(xiii) of CARO are not applicable to the company.

(xiv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not dealing or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments. However the company has investment in the shares of two private limited companies amounting to Rs. 76,91,000/- and proper records have been maintained of the transactions and contracts and timely entries have been made therein; also the shares have been held by the company, in its own name.

(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not given guarantees for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions. Accordingly, provisions of the paragraphs 4(xv) of CARO are not applicable to the company.

(xvi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, term loans availed by the company were, prima facie, applied for the purpose for which they were obtained, other than temporary deployment pending application.

(xvii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, and on an overall examination of the balance sheet of the company, funds raised on short-term basis have, prima facie, not been used during the year for long-term investment and no funds raised on long-term basis have been used for short-term investment.

(xviii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties and companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of The Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, provisions of the paragraphs 4(xviii) of CARO are not applicable to the company.

(xix) According to the information and explanations given to us, during the period covered by out audit report, the company had not issued any debentures and has not created any security in respect of debentures. Accordingly, provisions of the paragraphs 4(xix) of CARO are not applicable to the company.

(xx) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not raised any money from the public issue during the year.

(xxi) To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the company has been noticed or reported during the year.

For Kumar Piyush & Co. Chartered Accountants Firm Registration No.: 005120N

Sd/-

VIRENDRA KUMAR GOEL, PARTNER Membership Number: 083705

Place: New Delhi Date: May 30th, 2014


Mar 31, 2012

1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Raghunath International Limited as at March 31, 2012, also the Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

3. As required by the Companies (Auditors' Report) Order, 2003, as amended by the Companies (Auditor's Report) (Amendment Order 2004 (together the 'order') issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, and on the basis of such checks as we considered appropriate, and according to the information and explanations given to us, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order to the extent applicable to the company.

4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report that;

i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

(iii) The Balance Sheet, the Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;.

iv) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, the Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement dealt from this report comply with the accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956;

v) On the basis of written representations received from the directors, as on March 31, 2012 and taken on records by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the directors in disqualified as on March 31, 2012 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;

vi) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us and subject to para number 13 of the notes on accounts regarding non-provision of liability of gratuity as per AS-15 issued by The ICAI, the said accounts give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and failure view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

(a) In the cases of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the company as at March 31, 2012;

(b) In the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the profit for the year ended on that date; and

(c) In the case of Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

ANNEXURE REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH 3 OF AUDITOR'S REPORT OF EVEN DATE TO THE MEMBERS OF RAGHUNATH INTERNATIONAL LIMITED ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2012

(i) (a) The company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) We have been informed that the fixed assets of the company are physically verified by the management according to a phased program designed to cover all the items over a period of three years, which in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the company and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

(c) Fixed assets amounting to Rs. 3,27,681.10 disposed off during the year, in our opinion it do not constitute a substantial part of fixed assets of the company and such disposal has not affected the going concern status of the company.

(ii) (a) The inventory of the company has been physically verified during the year by the management. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is reasonable.

(b) In our opinion, the procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the company and the nature of its business.

(c) The company has maintained proper records of inventory. As explained to us, there were no material discrepancies noticed on physical verification of inventory as compared to the book records.

(iii) As informed, the company has neither granted nor taken any loan, secured or unsecured to/from companies, firm or other parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of The Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, provisions of the paragraphs 4(iii) (a) to (g) of CARO are not applicable to the company.

(iv) There is adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of its business with regard to the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services. Further, on the basis of our examination of the books and records of the company, and according to the information and explanations given to us, we have neither come across nor have we been informed of any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in the aforesaid internal control system.

(v) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there are no contracts or arrangements referred to in section 301 of The Companies Act, 1956 that need to be entered in the register required to be maintained under that section. Accordingly, provisions of the paragraphs 4(v) (a) and (b) of CARO are not applicable to the company.

(vi) As informed, the Company has not accepted any deposits from the public during the year within the meaning of section 58A and 58AA of The Companies Act, 1956 and the rules framed there under and no order in this respect in the case of the company has been passed by the Company Law Board or Company Law Tribunal or The Reserve Bank of India or any court or any other tribunal.

(vii) The company does not have internal audit system commensurate with the size and nature of its business.

(viii) According to the information and explanation given to us, the Central Government has not prescribed for the maintenance of cost records under Section 209(1) (d) of The Companies Act, 1956 for any of its product. Accordingly, provisions of the paragraphs 4(vii) of CARO are not applicable to the company.

(ix) (a) According to the books and records as produced and examined by us in accordance with generally accepted auditing practices in India and also based on management representations, undisputed statutory dues, if applicable, in respect of Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees' State Insurance dues, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues with the appropriate authorities have generally been regularly deposited by the company subject to the following:

i) The company has not deposited the liability of Service Tax in due time during the financial year. The company has not produced before us any statutory record pertaining to service tax such as Service Tax Returns. However, on the basis of examination of the books of the accounts of the company, there was no amount remaining outstanding as at the last day of the financial year, for a period of more than six month from the date they became payable.

(b) According to the information and explanation given to us no undisputed amounts payable in respect of Provident Fund, Employees' State Insurance dues, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Income Tax, Wealth Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Service Tax, VAT, Cess and other undisputed statutory dues were outstanding, at the year end, for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(c) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has paid all undisputed dues of excise duty. However, the following is the particulars of dispute/dues in respect of Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty and Cess.

Name of statute Nature of Amount Period to which The Dues (Rupees In Lakh) the amount relates

Rs. 24.69 (Demand Central Excise Excise was Rs. 32.86 Lakh Assessment Year and Customs Act Rs. 8.17 Lakh has 2003-2004 already been deposited under protest) Rs. 6891.57 (Demand Central Excise Excise was Rs. 7191.57 Lakh Till the date of and Customs Act Rs. Search 300.00 Lakh has i.e. 09.05.2008 already been deposited under protest)

Name of statute Forum where the dispute is pending

Central Excise The Deputy Commissioner Central Excise, and Customs Act Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh (The matter is under subjudice)

Central Excise The Commissioner of Central Excise, Kanpur, and Customs Act Uttar Pradesh (The matter is under subjudice)

(x) The company has not accumulated losses as at March 31, 2012 however it has incurred cash loss of Rs. 8,13,430.13 out of loss of Rs. 13,02,111.95 during the financial year ended on that date and it has incurred Rs. 9,18,760.42 cash loss out of total loss of Rs. 17,94,858.40 in the immediately preceding financial year.

(xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not defaulted in repayment of its dues to any financial institution or bank. The company has not raised any sum by issue of debentures.

(xii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities. Accordingly, provisions of the paragraphs 4(xii) of CARO are not applicable to the company.

(xiii) In our opinion, considering the nature of activities carried on by the company during the year, the provisions of any special statute applicable to Chit Fund/ Nidhi/ Mutual Benefit Fund/ Society are not applicable to it. Accordingly, provisions of the paragraphs 4(xiii) of CARO are not applicable to the company.

(xiv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not given guarantees for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions. Accordingly, provisions of the paragraphs 4(xv) of CARO are not applicable to the company.

(xv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, term loans availed by the company were, prima facie, applied for the purpose for which they were obtained, other than temporary deployment pending application.

(xvi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, and on an overall examination of the balance sheet of the company, funds raised on short-term basis have, prima facie, not been used during the year for long-term investment and no funds raised on long-term basis have been used for short-term investment.

(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties and companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of The Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, provisions of the paragraphs 4(xviii) of CARO are not applicable to the company.

(xviii) According to the information and explanations given to us, during the period covered by out audit report, the company had not issued any debentures and has not created any security in respect of debentures. Accordingly, provisions of the paragraphs 4(xix) of CARO are not applicable to the company.

(xix) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not raised any money from the public issue during the year.

(xx) To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the company has been noticed or reported during the year.

For Kumar Piyush & Co. Chartered Accountants Firm Registration No.: 005120N

Sd/- Virendra Kumar Goel Partner Membership No.: 083705

Place: New Delhi Date : May 30, 2012


Mar 31, 2010

1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Raghunath International Limited as at March 31, 2010, also the Profit a Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These financial statements are t responsibility of the companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements bas on our audit.

2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those Standards require tr we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of mater misstatement: An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures In the financ statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by manageme as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis I our opinion.

3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003, as amended by the Companies (Auditors Report) (Amendmei Order 2004 (together the order) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of tl Companies Act, 1956, and on the basis of such checks as we considered appropriate, and according to the information ai explanations given to us, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Ord to the extent applicable to the company.

4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report that;

(i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary I the purposes of our audit;

(ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the company so far as appears from examination of those books;

(iii) The Balance Sheet, the Profit and Loss Accountand Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement wi the books of account;.

(iv) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, the Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement dealt from this report comp with the accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956;

(v) On the basis of written representations received from the directors, as on March 31, 2010 and taken on records by tlBoard of Directors, we report that none of the directors in disqualified as on March 31, 2010 from being appointed as director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;

(vi) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us and subject to para numb 12 of the notes on accounts regarding non-provision of liability of gratuity as per AS-15 issued by The ICAI, the said a counts give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and fair vie in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

(a) In the cases of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the company as at March 31,2010;

(b) In the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the profit for the year ended on that date; and

(c) In the case of Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

ANNEXURE REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH 3 OF AUDITORS REPORT OF EVEN DATE TO THE MEMBERS OF RAGHUNATH INTERNATIONAL LIMITED ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2010

(i) (a) The company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situa- tion of fixed assets.

(b) We have been informed that the fixed assets of the company are physically verified by the management ac- cording to a phased program designed to cover all the items over a period of three years, which in our opinion, Is reasonable having regard to the size of the company and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

(c) The fixed assets disposed off during the year, in our opinion, do not constitute a substantial part of fixed assets of the company and such disposal has, in our opinion, not affected the going concern status of the company.

(ii) (a) The inventory of the company has been physically verified during the year by the management. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is reasonable.

(b) In our opinion, the procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the company and the nature of its business.

(c) The company has maintained proper records of inventory. As explained to us, there were no material discrep- ancies noticed on physical verification of inventory as compared to the book records

(iii) As informed, the company has neither granted nor taken any loan, secured or unsecured to/from companies, firm or other parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of The Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, provisions of the paragraphs 4(iii) (a) to (g) of CARO are not applicable to the company.

(iv) There is adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of its business with regard to the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services. Further, on the basis of our examination of the books and records of the company, and according to the information and explanations given to us, we have neither come across nor have we been informed of any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in the aforesaid Internal control system.

(v) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there are no contracts or arrangements referred to in section 301 of The Companies Act, 1956 that need to be entered in the register required to be main- tained under that section. Accordingly, provisions of the paragraphs 4(v) (a) and (b) of CARO are not applicable to the company.

(vi) As informed, the Company has not accepted any deposits from the public during the year within the meaning of sec- tion 58A and 58AA of The Companies Act, 1956 and the rules framed there under and no order in this respect in the case of the company has been passed by the Company Law Board or Company Law Tribunal or The Reserve Bank of India or any court or any other tribunal.

(vii) The company does not have internal audit system commensurate with the size and nature of its business.

(vii) According to the information and explanation given to us, the Central Government has not prescribed for the main- tenance of cost records under Section 209(1) (d) of The Companies Act, 1956 for any of its product. Accordingly, provisions of the paragraphs 4(vii) of CARO are not applicable to the company.

(ix) (a) According to the books and records as produced and examined by us in accordance with generally accepted auditing practices in India and also based on management representations, undisputed statutory dues, if ap- plicable, in respect of Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees State Insurance dues, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues with the appropriate authorities have generally been regularly deposited by the company sub- ject to the following:

i) The company has not deposited the liability of Service Tax in due time during the financial year. The company has not produced before us any statutory record pertaining to service tax such as Service Tax Returns. However, on the basis of examination of the books of the accounts of the company, there was no amount remaining outstanding as at the last day of the financial year, for a period of more than six month from the date they became payable.

ii) In respect of the construction division of the company, an amount of Rs. 720,731/- on account of VAT paid by the company at the time of purchases of materials has been booked in purchases and at the same time the said amount has also been claimed as input claim while filing the return of VAT with The Department of Commercial Taxes, Haridwar, Uttarakhand. Hence, the profit of the company during the year has been under rep6rted to the extent of VAT input claim of Rs. 720,731/-.

(b) According to the information and explanation given to us no undisputed amounts payable in respect of Provi- dent Fund, Employees State Insurance dues, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Income Tax, Wealth Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Service Tax, VAT, Cess and other undisputed statutory dues were outstanding, at the year end, for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(c) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has paid all undisputed dues of excise duty. However, the following is the particulars of dispute/dues in respect of Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty and Cess.

Name of statute Nature of The Amount Period to which the Forum where the dispute is Dues (Rupees In Lakh) amount relates pending

Rs.24.69 (Actual Demand Central Excise Excise was Rs. 32.86 Lakh and Rs. Assessment Year The Deputy Commissioner

and Customs Act 8.17 Lakh has already been 2003-2004 Central, Kanpur deposited) Rs. 6891.57 Till the The (Actual Demand date of Commissioner Central Excise search of Cen Excise was Rs. 71 91 i.e. 09.05 tral Excise, and Customs Act 2008 Kanpur, Uttar .57 Lakh and Pradesh Rs. 300.00 Lakh has already been deposited)

(x) The company has neither accumulated losses as at March 31, 2010, nor has it incurred any cash fosses either during the financial year ended on that date or in the immediately preceding financial year.

(xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not defaulted in repayment of its dues to any financial institution or bank. The company has not raised any sum by issue of debentures.

(xii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities. Accordingly, provi- sions of the paragraphs

(xii) ofCARO are not applicable to the company.

(xiil) In our opinion, considering the nature of activities carried on by the company during the year, the provisions of any special statute applicable to Chit Fund/ Nidhi/ Mutual Benefit Fund/ Society are not applicable to it. Accordingly, provisions of the paragraphs 4(xiii) of CARO are not applicable to the company.

(xiv) The company has not invested, dealt or traded in shares, securities, debentures and other investments during the year. Accordingly, provisions of the paragraphs 4(xiv) of CARO are not applicable to the dbmpany.

(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not given guarantees for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions. Accordingly, provisions of the paragraphs 4(xv) of CARO are not applicable to the company.

(xvi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, term loans availed by the company were, prima facie, applied for the purpose for which they were obtained, other than temporary deployment pending application.

(xvii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, and on an overall examination of the balance sheet of the company, funds raised on short-term basis have, prima facie, not been used during the year for long-term investment and no funds raised on long-term basis have been used for short-term investment.

(xviii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties and companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of The Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, provisions of the paragraphs 4(xviii) of CARO are not applicable to the company

(xix) (According to the information and explanations given to us, during the period covered by out audit report, the com- pany had not issued any debentures and has not created any security in respect of debentures. Accordingly, provi- sions of the paragraphs 4(xix) of CARO are not applicable to the company

(xx) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not raised any money from the public issue during the year.

(xxi) To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the company has been noticed or reported during the year.

For Kumar Piyush & Co.

Chartered Accountants

Firm Registration No.: 005120N

Virendra Kumar Goel

Partner.

Membership Number: 83705

Place: New Delhi

Date: May 29, 2010

 
Subscribe now to get personal finance updates in your inbox!