Mar 31, 2015
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of M/S. RAINBOW
FOUNDATIONS LIMITED, CHENNAI - 600 017 ( the Company ), which comprise
the Balance Sheet as at March 31, 2015 and the Statement of Profit and
Loss, the Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of
significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Management s Responsibility for the Financial Statements
The Company s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated
in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 ( the Act ) with respect to
the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair
view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of
the Company in accordance with the accounting principles general
accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards specified under
Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts)
Rules,2014. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate
accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for
safeguarding of the assets of the Company and for preventing and
detecting frauds and other irregularities, selection and application of
appropriate accounting policies, making judgements and estimates that
are reasonable and prudent, and design, implementation and maintenance
of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively
for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of accounting records,
relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements
that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement,
whether due to fraud or error.
Auditor s Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit.
We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting
and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in
the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made
thereunder.
we conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing
specified under Section 143(10) of the Act.
Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and
plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures
selected depend on the auditor s judgment, including the assessment of
the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether
due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor
considers internal financial control relevant to the Company s
preparation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view
in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on
whether the Company has in place an adequate internal financial
controls system over financial reporting and the operating
effectiveness of such controls. An audit also includes evaluating the
appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of
the accounting estimates made by the Company s Directors, as well as
evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and
appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the standalone
financial statements.
Opinion
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the
explanations given to us, the aforesaid financial statements give the
information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a
true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as
at 31st March, 2015, and its profit and its cash flows for the year
ended on that date:
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
1. As required by the Companies (Auditor s Report) Order, 2015 ( the
Order ), issued by the Central Government of India in terms of
Sub-Section (11) of Section 143 of the Act, we give in the Annexure a
statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.
2. As required by Section 143(3) of the Act, we report that:
(a) we have sought and obtained all the information and explanations
which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the
purpose of our audit.
(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of
those books.
(c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash
Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the
books of account.
(d) In our opinion, the aforesaid financial statements comply with the
Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with
Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014.
(e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors
as on March 31,2015, and taken on record by the Board of Directors,
none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31,2015, from being
appointed as a director in terms of Section 164(2) of the Act.
(f) with respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor s
Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditor)
Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and
according to the explanations given to us :
i. The Company does not have any pending litigations which would
impact its financial position.
ii. The Company did not have any long-term contracts including
derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable
losses.
iii. There were no amounts which were required to be transferred to the
Investor Education and Protection Fund by the company.
ANNEXURE TO THE AUDITORS REPORT
The Annexure referred to in Paragraph 1 under the heading Report on
Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements of our Independent Auditors
Report to the shareholders of M/S RAINBOwW FOUNDATIONS LIMITED, for the
year ended 31st March 2015 and in terms of the information and
explanations given to us and also on the basis of such checks as we
considered appropriate we further state that:
(I) a. The company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
b. All the assets have not been physically verified by the management
during the year but there is a regular programme of verification which,
in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the company
and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on
such verification.
(ii) a. The inventory has been physically verified during the year by
the management. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is
reasonable
b. The procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by
the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of
the company and the nature of its business.
c. The company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The
discrepancies noticed on verification between the physical stocks and
the book records were not material.
(iii) According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, the company has not granted any loans, secured or
unsecured to Companies, Firms or other parties covered in the register
maintained under section 189 of the Companies Act.
(iv) According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, there is an adequate internal control procedure
commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its
business for the purchase of fixed assets and for the sale of flats and
plots. Further, on the basis of our examination of the books and
records of the company, we have neither come across nor have been
informed of any continuing failure to correct major weakness in the
aforesaid internal control procedure.
(v) According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, the Company has not accepted any deposit within the
meaning of the Provisions of Section 73 to 76 or any other relevant
provisions of Companies Act and the rules framed thereunder. According
to the information and explanation given to us, no order been passed by
the Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank
of India or any court or any other tribunal.
(vi) In our opinion, and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the company is not required to maintain cost records under
Section 148 of the Companies Act.
(vii) a. According to the information and explanations given to us and
in our opinion, the company is regular in depositing undisputed
statutory dues including provident fund, employee s state insurance,
income-tax, sales-tax, wealth tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of
excise, value added tax, cess and any other statutory dues with the
appropriate authorities and no dues for a period of more than six months
from the date they became payable.
b. According to the information and explanation given to us, there are
no dues of sale tax or wealth tax or duty of customs or duty of excise
or value added tax or cess have not been deposited on account of any
dispute.
The particulars of Income Tax and Service Tax as at 31st March 2015
which have not been deposited on account of dispute are as follows:
Name of the Nature of Dues Amount under dispute
Statue not yet deposited Rs.
Income Tax Income tax 2,85,218
Act 1961 including
interest till
the date of
assessment
Income Tax Income Tax Rs. 3,33,003/-
Act 1961 Along with
Interest till
the date of
Assessment
Finance Service Tax & Rs. 7,91,330/-
Act 1994 Penalty, Interest
(Service lax) to be quantified
till the date of
actual payment
Finance Service Tax &
Act 1994 Penalty, Interest
(Service lax) to be quantified
till the date of Rs. 29,71,557/-
actual payment
Name of the Period to which Forum where the
Statue amount relates dispute is pending
Income Tax AY 2002-03 The HonÂble Madras
Act 1961 High court, Chennai
Income Tax AY 2007-08 The Commissioner of Income
Act 1961 Tax (Appeals) Chennai
Finance From November 2004 The Commissioner of Central
Act 1994 to Excise (Appeals) Chennai
(Service lax) September 2007
Finance 2006-2007 The Commissioner of Central
Act 1994 to Excise (Appeals) Chennai
(Service lax) 2010-20 11
c. According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, there were no amounts which were required to be
transferred to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the
company.
(viii) In our opinion and according to the information and
explanations given to us, the company does not have any accumulated
loss. The company has not incurred cash losses during the financial
year and the immediately preceding financial year.
(ix) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to a
financial institution and banks, and there are no debenture holders.
(x) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from bank
or financial institutions.
(xi) In our opinion, and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the company has taken term loans from financial
institutions and the term loans have been applied for the purpose for
which loans were obtained.
(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
fraud on or by the company has been noticed or reported during the
year.
PLACE: CHENNAI For JAIN BAFNA AND CO.
DATE: 29.05.2015 (Chartered Accountants)
Firm Reg No:010657 S
(S.MUTHU KUMAR)
(Partner)
Address: F-1,58, Greams Road,
Chennai 600 006 Mem No: 209636
Mar 31, 2014
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of M/S. RAINBOW
FOUNDATIONS LIMITED, CHENNAI - 600 017 ("the Company"), which comprise
the Balance Sheet as at March 31, 2014, the Statement of Profit and
Loss for the year then ended, the Cash Flow Statement for the year then
ended and a summary of significant accounting policies and other
explanatory information.
Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial
statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position,
financial performance of the Company in accordance with the Accounting
Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the
Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act"). This responsibility includes the
design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to
the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give
a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether
due to fraud or error.
Auditor''s Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance
with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with
ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures
selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of
the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether
due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor
considers internal control relevant to the Company''s preparation and
fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also
includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and
the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial
statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and
appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion. Opinion
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the
explanations given to us, the financial statements give the information
required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair
view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in
India:
(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at March 31, 2014;
(b) in the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the PROFIT for
the year ended on that date;
(c) In the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the
year ended on that date;
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 ("the
Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of
sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Act, we give in the Annexure a
statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.
2. As required by section 227(3) of the Act, we report that:
a. we have obtained all the information and explanations which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit;
b. in our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been
kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those
books;
c. the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of
account;
d. in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss and
Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards referred to in
subsection (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956;
e. on the basis of written representations received from the directors
as on March 31, 2014, and taken on record by the Board of Directors,
none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2014, from being
appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of
section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.
f. Since the Central Government has not issued any notification as to
the rate at which the cess is to be paid under section 441A of the
Companies Act, 1956 nor has it issued any Rules under the said section,
prescribing the manner in which such cess is to be paid, no cess is due
and payable by the Company.
In the case of M/s RAINBOW FOUNDATIONS LIMITED,
The Annexure referred to in Paragraph 1 under the heading "Report on
Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements" of our Independent Auditors
Report to the shareholders of M/S RAINBOW FOUNDATIONS LIMITED, for the
year ended 31st March 2014 and in terms of the information and
explanations given to us and also on the basis of such checks as we
considered appropriate we further state that:
i.
a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars
including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.
b) The Fixed Assets have been physically verified at the year-end by
the management and in our opinion the frequency of verification is
reasonable and there was no discrepancy noticed on such verification by
the management.
c) During the year the company has disposed of a part of the Building.
According to the information and explanations given to us, we are of
the opinion that the sale of the said part of Building has not affected
the going concern status of the company.
ii
a) The inventory has been physically verified during the year by the
management. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is
reasonable.
b) The procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by
the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of
the company and the nature of its business.
c) The company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The
discrepancies noticed on verification between the physical stocks and
the book records were not material.
iii.
a) According to the information and explanations given to us and in our
opinion, during the year the Company has taken interest unsecured loan
from two parties listed under the register maintained under section 301
of the Companies Act, 1956 and the closing balance is Rs. 1766.00Lakhs
and the maximum amount outstanding was Rs. 1902.53 Lakhs. The company
has not granted unsecured loans to parties listed in the register
maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
b) In our opinion, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions
on which loan has been taken from companies, firms or other parties
listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956 are not, prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the
company.
c) The company is regular in repaying the principal amounts as
stipulated and has been regular in the payment of interest.
d) There is no overdue amount of loans taken from companies, firms or
other parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956.
iv. According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, there is an adequate internal control procedure
commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its
business for the purchase of fixed assets and for the sale of flats and
plots. Further, on the basis of our examination of the books and
records of the company, we have neither come across nor have been
informed of any continuing failure to correct major weakness in the
aforesaid internal control procedure.
v.
a) According to the information and explanations given to us, we are of
the opinion that the transactions that need to be entered into the
register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have
been so entered.
b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts or
arrangements entered in the register maintained under section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956 and exceeding the value of rupees five lakhs in
respect of any party during the year have been made at prices which are
reasonable having regard to prevailing market prices at the relevant
time.
vi. According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, the Company has not accepted any deposit from the public
within the meaning of the Provisions of Section 58A and 58AA of the
Companies Act, 1956 and the rules framed there under and the directions
issued by the Reserve Bank of India. No order has been passed by the
Company Law Board.
vii. According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, the Company does not have an independent Internal Auditor.
However they have an Internal Audit system commensurate with the size
and nature of its business
viii. According to information and explanations given to us, the
Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost records
under section 209 (1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 for the company''s
products.
ix.
a. According to the information and explanations given to us and in our
opinion, the Company is generally regular in depositing with
appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues as applicable to it
and there were no undisputed amount payable in respect of Income-Tax,
Wealth Tax, Sales Tax, Customs Duty and Excise Duty outstanding as on
31st March 2014, for a period of more than six months from the date
they became payable.
b. According to the information and explanations given to us and based
on the records of the Company, as at 31st March 2014, there are no dues
of wealth tax/ customs duty/excise duty/cess, which have not been
deposited on account of any dispute. The particulars of Income Tax and
Service Tax as at 31st March 2014 which have not been deposited on
account of dispute are as follows:
Name of the Nature of Dues Amount Period to which Forum where
Statue under amount relates the dispute
dispute is pending
not yet
deposited
Rs.
Income Tax Income tax 2,85,218 AY 2002-03 The Hon''ble
Act 1961 including Madras High
interest till court,
the date of Chennai
assessment
Income Tax Income Tax 3,33,003 AY 2007-08 The
Act 1961 Along with Commissioner
Interest till of Income
the date of (Appeals),
assessment Chennai
Finance Act Service Tax &. 7,91,330 From November Commissioner
1994 Penalty, 2004 to of Central
(Service Tax) Interest September Excise
to be 2007 (Appeals),
Quantified Chennai
till the date
of actual
payment.
x. According to the information and explanations given to us and in our
opinion, The Company does not have any accumulated losses as at 31st
March 2014 and has not incurred any cash losses in the financial year
ended on that date or in the immediately preceding financial year.
xi. According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, during the year, the Company has not defaulted in
repayment of dues to any financial institution or bank and there are no
debenture holders.
xii. According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, the Company has not granted any loan or advance by way of
pledge of shares, debentures and other securities and hence paragraph 4
(xii) of the Companies (Auditors'' Report) Order 2003 is not applicable.
xiii. According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, the Company is not a nidhi/mutual benefit fund/society,
paragraph 4 (xiii) of the Companies (Auditors'' Report) Order 2003 is
not applicable.
xiv. According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, the Company is not dealing or trading in shares,
securities, debentures and other investments, paragraph 4 (xiv) of the
Companies (Auditors'' Report) Order 2003 is not applicable.
xv. According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, the Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by
others from bank or financial institutions.
xvi. According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, the term loans have been applied for the purpose for which
they were raised.
xvii. According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, on the basis of overall examination of the Balance Sheet
of the Company, there were no funds raised on a short - term basis
which have been used for long - term investment and vice versa.
xviii. According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, the Company has not made any preferential allotment of
shares during the year to any party and hence paragraph 4 (xviii) of
the Companies (Auditors'' Report) Order 2003 is not applicable.
xix. According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, the Company has not issued any debenture during the year
and hence paragraph 4 (xix) of the Companies (Auditors'' Report) Order
2003 is not applicable.
xx. According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, the Company has not raised any money during the year by
way of public issue, paragraph 4 (xx) of the Companies (Auditors''
Report) Order 2003 is not applicable.
xxi. To the best of our knowledge and according to the information and
explanations given to us and the records of the Company examined by us,
no fraud on or by the Company was noticed or reported during the year.
PLACE: CHENNAI For JAIN BAFNA AND CO.,
DATED : 30th May 2014 (Chartered Accountants)
(S.MUTHUKUMAR)
(Partner)
Address: F-1, 58, Greams Road,
Chennai 600 006
Mem No: 209636
Firm Reg No:010657 S
Mar 31, 2011
1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of M/S. RAINBOW
FOUNDATIONS LIMITED, CHENNAI - 600 017 as at 31st March 2011 and also
the Proft and Loss account for the year ended on that date and the Cash
Flow Statement for the year ended on that date, both annexed thereto.
These fnancial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on their
financial statements based on our audit.
2. We have conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatements. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates by
the management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditors' Report) Order, 2003, issued
by the Company Law Board in terms of Section 227(4A) of the Companies
Act, 1956, we enclose in the annexure a statement on the matters
specified in the paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 3
above we state that:
a. We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit.
b. In our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been
kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of books.
c. The Company's Balance Sheet, the Profit & Loss Account and the Cash
Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the
books of account.
d. In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, the Profit & Loss Account and
the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in compliance
with the accounting standards and the significant accounting policies
referred to in Section 211(3C) of the Companies Act, 1956, to the
extent applicable to this Company.
e. On the basis of the written representation received from the
directors, as on 31/03/2011, and taken on record by the board, we
report that none of the Directors is disqualified as on 31/03/2011 from
being appointed as Director under clause (g) of sub section (1) of
section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.
f. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts read together with the
Notes and Schedules thereon, give the information required by the
Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and fair
view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in
India:
1. In the case of the Balance Sheet of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31st March 2011, and
2. In the case of the Proft & Loss Account of the Profit of the
Company for the year ended on that date.
3. In the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the
year ended on that date.
In the case of M/s RAINBOW FOUNDATIONS LIMITED,
In terms of the Companies (Auditors' Report) Order, 2003 issued by the
Company Law Board and on the basis of such checks as we considered
appropriate we further report that:
i. a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
b) The Fixed Assets have been physically verified at the year end by
the management and in our opinion the frequency of verifcation is
reasonable and there was no discrepancy noticed on such verifcation by
the management.
c) Since there is no disposal of substantial part of its fxed assets
during the year, paragraph 4 (i) (c) of the Companies (Auditors'
Report) Order 2003 is not applicable.
ii. a) The inventory has been physically verifed during the year by the
management. In our opinion, the frequency of verifcation is reasonable.
b) The procedures of physical verifcation of inventories followed by
the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of
the company and the nature of its business.
c) The company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The
discrepancies noticed on verification between the physical stocks and
the book records were not material.
iii. a) According to the information and explanations given to us and
in our opinion, during the year the Company has not taken unsecured
loan from any party listed The company has not granted unsecured loans
to parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956.
b) In our opinion, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions
on which loans have been taken from companies, firms or other parties
listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956 are not, prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the
company.
c) The company is regular in repaying the principal amounts as
stipulated and has been regular in the payment of interest.
iv. According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, there is an adequate internal control procedure
commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its
business for the purchase of fixed assets and for the sale of fats and
plots. Further, on the basis of our examination of the books and
records of the company, we have neither come across nor have been
informed of any continuing failure to correct major weakness in the
aforesaid internal control procedure.
v. According to the information and explanations given to us and in our
opinion, there are no transactions with any of the parties that need to
be entered in the register maintained under section 301 of the
Companies Act 1956 (1 of 1956).
vi. According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, the Company has not accepted any deposit from the public
within the meaning of the Provisions of Section 58A and 58AA of the
Companies Act,1956 and the rules framed there under and the directions
issued by the Reserve Bank of India.
vii. According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, the Company does not have an independent Internal Auditor.
However they have an Internal Audit system commensurate with the size
and nature of its business.
viii. According to information and explanations given to us, the
Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost records
under section 209 (1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 for the company's
products.
ix. a. According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, the Company is generally regular in depositing with
appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues as applicable to it
and there were no undisputed amount payable in respect of Income-Tax,
Wealth Tax, Sales Tax, Customs Duty and Excise Duty outstanding as on
31st March 2011, for a period of more than six months from the date
they became payable. b. According to the information and explanations
given to us and based on the records of the Company, as at 31st March
2011, there are no dues of wealth tax/ customs duty/excise duty/cess,
which have
not been deposited on account of any dispute. The particulars of Income
Tax and Sales Tax as at 31st March 2011 which have not been deposited
on account of dispute are as follows:
Amount under
Name of the Nature of Dues dispute not yet
Statue deposited Rs.
Income Tax Act Income tax including
1961 interest till the 2,85,218 1961
date of assessment
Income Tax Act Income Tax Along with 2,25,291 1961
1961 Interest till the date
of Assessment
Income Tax Act Income Tax Along with 4,02,650 1961
1961 Interest till the date
of Assessment
Income Tax Act Income Tax Along with Rs. 3,33,003/-
1961 Interest till the date
of Assessment
Name of the Period to Forum where the
Statue which amount dispute is pending
relates
Income Tax Act AY 2002-03 The Hon'ble Madras
High court, Chennai
The Commissioner of
Income Tax Act AY 2002-03 Income Tax (Appeals)
Income Tax Act AY 2006-07 The Commissioner of
Income Tax (Appeals)
Income Tax Act AY 2007-08 The Commissioner of
Income Tax (Appeals)
x. According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, The Company does not have any accumulated losses as at
31st March 2011 and has not incurred any cash losses in the fnancial
year ended on that date or in the immediately preceding financial year.
xi. According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, during the year, the Company has not defaulted in
repayment of dues to any financial institution or bank and there are no
debenture holders.
xii. According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, the Company has not granted any loan or advance by way of
pledge of shares, debentures and other securities and hence paragraph 4
(xii) of the Order is not applicable
xiii. According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, the Company is not a nidhi/ mutual benefit fund/society,
paragraph 4 (xiii) of the Order is not applicable xiv. According to the
information and explanations given to us and in our opinion, the
Company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities, debentures and
other investments, paragraph 4 (xiv) of the Order is not applicable
xv. According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, the Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by
others from bank or financial institutions. xvi. According to the
information and explanations given to us and in our opinion, the term
loans have been applied for the purpose for which they were raised.
xvii. According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, on the basis of overall examination of the Balance Sheet
of the Company, there were no funds raised on a short - term basis
which have been used for long à term investment and vice versa.
xviii.According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, the Company has notmade any preferential allotment of
shares during the year to any party and hence paragraph 4 (xviii) of
the Order is not applicable
xix. According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, the Company has not issued any debenture during the year
and hence paragraph 4 (xix) of the Order is not applicable xx.
According to the information and explanations given to us and in our
opinion, the Company has not raised any money during the year by way of
public issue, paragraph 4 (xx) of the Order is not applicable
xxi. To the best of our knowledge and according to the information and
explanations given to us and the records of the Company examined by us,
no fraud on or by the Company was noticed or reported during the year.
For JAIN BAFNA AND CO
(Chartered Accountants)
(NARENDER KUMAR LODHA)
(Partner)
Address: F-1, 58, Greams Road
Chennai 600 006
Mem No: 200/27640
Firm Reg No:010657 S
PLACE: CHENNAI
DATE : 5th September 2011
Mar 31, 2010
1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of M/S. RAINBOW
FOUNDATIONS LIMITED, CHENNAI Ã 600 017 as at 31st March 2010 and also
the Proft and Loss account for the year ended on that date and the Cash
Flow Statement for the year ended on that date, both annexed thereto.
These fnancial statements are the responsibility of the Companys
Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on their
fnancial statements based on our audit.
2. We have conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
fnancial statements are free of material misstatements. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the fnancial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and signifcant estimates by
the management, as well as evaluating the overall fnancial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003, issued
by the Company Law Board in terms of Section 227(4A) of the Companies
Act, 1956, we enclose in the annexure a statement on the matters
specifed in the paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 3
above we state that:
a. We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit.
b. In our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been
kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of books.
c. The Companys Balance Sheet, the Proft & Loss Account and the Cash
Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the
books of account.
d. In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, the Proft & Loss Account and the
Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in compliance with
the accounting standards and the signifcant accounting policies
referred to in Section 211(3C) of the Companies Act, 1956, to the
extent applicable to this Company.
e. On the basis of the written representation received from the
directors, as on 31/03/2010, and taken on record by the board, we
report that none of the Directors is disqualifed as on 31/03/2010 from
being appointed as Director under clause (g) of sub section (1) of
section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.
f. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts read together with the
Notes and Schedules thereon, give the information required by the
Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and fair
view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in
India:
1. In the case of the Balance Sheet of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31st March 2010, and
2. In the case of the Proft & Loss Account of the Proft of the Company
for the year ended on that date.
3. In the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash fows for the
year ended on that date.
In the case of M/s RAINBOW FOUNDATIONS LIMITED,
In terms of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 issued by the
Company Law Board and on the basis of such checks as we considered
appropriate we further report that:
i. a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of fxed
assets.
b) The Fixed Assets have been physically verifed at the year end by the
management and in our opinion the frequency of verifcation is
reasonable and there was no discrepancy noticed on such verifcation by
the management.
c) Since there is no disposal of substantial part of its fxed assets
during the year, paragraph 4 (i) (c) of the Companies (Auditors
Report) Order 2003 is not applicable.
ii. According to the information and explanations given to us, in
respect of development of fats, since the construction is on contract
basis the need for maintaining the stock records for the same does not
arise and hence paragraph 4 (ii) of the Companies (Auditors Report)
Order 2003 is not applicable.
iii. a) According to the information and explanations given to us and
in our opinion, the Company has taken unsecured loan from one party
listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956. The maximum amount involved during the year and the year end
balance of such loan aggregates to Rs.35,00,000/- and Rs.21,00,000/-
respectively. The company has not granted unsecured loans to parties
listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956.
b) In our opinion, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions
on which loans have been taken from companies, frms or other parties
listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956 are not, prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the
company.
c) The company is regular in repaying the principal amounts as
stipulated and has been regular in the payment of interest.
iv. According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, there is an adequate internal control procedure
commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its
business for the purchase of fxed assets and for the sale of fats and
plots. Further, on the basis of our examination of the books and
records of the company, we have neither come across nor have been
informed of any continuing failure to correct major weakness in the
aforesaid internal control procedure.
v. According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, there are no transactions with any of the parties that
need to be entered in the register maintained under section 301 of the
Companies Act 1956 (1 of 1956) .
vi. According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, the Company has not accepted any deposit from the public
within the meaning of the Provisions of Section 58A and 58AA of the
Companies Act,1956 and the rules framed there under and the directions
issued by the Reserve Bank of India.
vii. According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, the Company does not have an independent Internal Auditor.
However they have an Internal Audit system commensurate with the size
and nature of its business.
viii. According to information and explanations given to us, the
Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost records
under section 209 (1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 for the companys
products.
ix. a. According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, the Company is generally regular in depositing with
appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues as applicable to it
and there were no undisputed amount payable in respect of Income-Tax,
Wealth Tax, Sales Tax, Customs Duty and Excise Duty outstanding as on
31st March 2010, for a period of more than six months from the date
they became payable.
b. According to the information and explanations given to us and based
on the records of the Company, as at 31st March 2010, there are no dues
of wealth tax/ customs duty/excise duty/cess, which have not been
deposited on account of any dispute. The particulars of Income Tax and
Sales Tax as at 31st March 2010 which have not been deposited on
account of dispute are as follows:
Amount under
Name of the
Nature of Dues dispute not yet
Statue deposited Rs.
Income Tax Act Income tax including interest
2,85,218
1961 till the date of assessment
Income Tax Act Income Tax Along with Interest
2,25,291
1961 till the date of Assessment
Income Tax Act Income Tax Along with Interest
4,02,650
1961 till the date of Assessment
Income Tax Act Income Tax Along with Interest
3,33,003
1961 till the date of Assessment
Name of the Period to
Statue Forum where the
which amount
dispute is pending
relates
Income Tax Act The Honble Madras
1961 AY 2002-03 High court, Chennai
Income Tax Act The Commissioner of
1961 AY 2002-03 Income Tax (Appeals)
Income Tax Act The Commissioner of
1961 AY 2006-07 Income Tax (Appeals)
Income Tax Act The Commissioner of
1961 AY 2007-08 Income Tax (Appeals)
x. The Company does not have any accumulated losses as at 31st March
2010 and has not incurred any cash losses in the fnancial year ended on
that date or in the immediately preceding fnancial year.
xi. During the year, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of
dues to any fnancial institution or bank and there are no debenture
holders.
xii. According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, the Company has not granted any loan or advance by way of
pledge of shares, debentures and other securities and hence paragraph 4
(xii) of the Order is not applicable
xiii. As the Company is not a nidhi/mutual beneft fund/society,
paragraph 4 (xiii) of the Order is not applicable xiv. Since the
Company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities, debentures and
other investments, paragraph 4
(xiv) of the Order is not applicable
xv. According to the information and explanations given to us and in our
opinion, the Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by
others from bank or fnancial institutions.
xvi. According to the information and explanations given to us and in
our opinion, the term loans have been applied for the purpose for which
they were raised.
xvii. On the basis of overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the
Company, there were no funds raised on a short - term basis which have
been used for long à term investment and vice versa. xviii. The
Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares during the
year to any party and hence paragraph 4
(xviii) of the Order is not applicable
xix. The Company has not issued any debenture during the year and
hence paragraph 4 (xix) of the Order is not applicable
xx. Since the Company has not raised any money during the year by way
of public issue, paragraph 4 (xx) of the Order is not applicable
xxi. To the best of our knowledge and according to the information and
explanations given to us and the records of the Company examined by us,
no fraud on or by the Company was noticed or reported during the year.
For JAIN BAFNA AND CO
(Chartered Accountants)
(NARENDER KUMAR LODHA)
(Partner)
Address: F-1, 58, Greams Road,
Chennai 600 006
PLACE: CHENNAI Mem No: 200/27640
DATE : 4th September 2010 Firm Reg No:010657 S
Disclaimer: This is 3rd Party content/feed, viewers are requested to use their discretion and conduct proper diligence before investing, GoodReturns does not take any liability on the genuineness and correctness of the information in this article