Auditor Report of Remi Process Plant & Machinery Ltd.

Mar 31, 2014

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Remi Process Plant and Machinery Limited (the company), which comprise the balance sheet as at 31st March, 2014, and the statement of profit and loss and cash flow statement for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act"). This responsibility includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditors'' Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the company''s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company''s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

i. in the case of the balance sheet, of the state of affairs of the company as at 31st March, 2014;

ii. in the case of the statement of profit and loss, of the profit for the year ended on that date; and

iii. in the case of the cash flow statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Emphasis of matter:

Company has exposure to NSEL of Rs. 211.57 Lakhs and balance 25% i.e Rs. 74.04 Lakhs has been written off in the accounts as management is hopeful to recover the same to the extent of 75%.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Act, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.

2. As required by section 227(3) of the Act, we report that:

a. we have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit.

b. in our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the company so far as appears from our examination of those books.

c. the balance sheet, statement of profit and loss and cash flow statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account.

d. in our opinion, the balance sheet, statement of profit and loss, and cash flow statement comply with the accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956.

e. on the basis of written representations received from the directors as on 31st March, 2014, and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March, 2014, from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.

ANNEXURE TO THE AUDITORS'' REPORT

[Referred to in paragraph 1 under ''Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements'' section of our report of even date]

(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitative details and situation of its fixed assets.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, all the assets have not been physically verified by the management during the year but there is a regular programme of verification which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the company and the nature of its assets. To the best of our knowledge, no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

(c) The company has not disposed off substantial part of fixed assets during the year.

(ii) (a) The inventory has been physically verified during the year by the management. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is reasonable.

(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management were reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the company and the nature of its business.

(c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The discrepancies noticed on verification between the physical stocks and the book records were not material having regard to the size of the operations of the Company.

(iii) (a) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company granted loans to two Companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The maximum balance outstanding during the year was Rs. 1,085.00 Lakhs and the balance outstanding at the end of the year was Rs. 569.40.

(b) In our opinion, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions of loans given by the Company to Companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956, are not prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

(c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the parties have repaid the principal amounts as stipulated and have been regular in the payment of interest.

(d) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there is no overdue amount of loans granted to Companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(e) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not taken unsecured loan from parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Hence relevant para is not applicable to the Company.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there are adequate internal control procedures commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of its business with regard to purchases of inventory and fixed assets and with regard to the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in internal control systems.

(v) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us, we are of the opinion that the transactions that need to be entered into the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been so entered.

(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts or arrangements entered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 and exceeding the value of rupees five lakhs in respect of any party during the year have been made at prices which are reasonable having regard to prevailing market prices at the relevant time.

(vi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not accepted any deposits from the public and hence the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and provisions of sections 58A and 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975 are not applicable.

(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with the size and nature of its business.

(viii) In our opinion and according to information and explanations given to us, the maintenance of cost records has not been prescribed, for the products of the Company, by the Central Govt, under clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 209 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(ix) (a) According to the information and explanations provided to us, the Company is regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including Provident Fund, Investor Education Protection Fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues applicable to it. And there are no arrears of outstanding statutory dues as at the last day of the financial year for a period of more than six months from the date they become payable.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, the particulars of dues of Income tax, Wealth tax, Service tax, Sales Tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty and Cess as at 31st March, 2014, which have not been deposited on account of a dispute, are as follows:-

Sr. Name of the Statute Relevant Amount (Rs.) Form where No. period dispute is pending

1. Central Sales Tax Act 2006-2007 13,483.00 The Dy. Comm. Of Sales Tax(Appeals)

2. Central Sales Tax Act 2008-2009 69,03,293.00 The Dy. Comm. Of Sales Tax(Appeals)



3. Central Excise Act 2008-2009 19,584.00 The Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals)

(x) The Company does not have accumulated losses and has not incurred cash losses during the financial year covered by our audit and in the immediately preceding financial year.

(xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to a financial institution, bank or debenture holders.

(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

(xiii) In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/mutual benefit fund/society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the company.

(xiv) In our opinion, the Company is not dealing in or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments. According the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.

(xv) According to information and explanations given to us, the Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions.

(xvi) According to information and explanations given to us, the Company has applied the term loans for the purposes for which the loans were obtained.

(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, we report that the no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term investment.

(xviii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties and Companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Act during the year.

(xix) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has neither issued any debentures during the year nor issued earlier are outstanding. Accordingly, the provisions of clause (xix) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

(xx) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not raised any money by public issue during the year.

(xxi) According to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.

For SHANKARLAL JAIN & ASSOCIATES CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS (Firm Registration No. 109901W)

Sd/- (S. L. AGRAWAL) PLACE : MUMBAI PARTNER DATED: 30TH MAY, 2014 Membership Number 72184

---

Mar 31, 2012

1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of REMI PROCESS PLANT AND MACHINERY LIMITED as at 31st March, 2012, Statement of Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

3. As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.

4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report that:

(i) we have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the

best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;

(ii) in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been

kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

(iii) the Balance Sheet, the statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow

Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

(iv) in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956;

(v) On the basis of written representations received from the Directors, as on 31st March, 2012, and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March, 2012 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub- section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;

(vi) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31st March, 2012;

(b) in the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss , of the PROFIT for the year ended on that date; and

(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

ANNEXURE TO THE AUDITORS' REPORT

(REFERRED TO IN OUR REPORT OF EVEN DATE TO THE MEMBERS OF REMI PROCESS PLANT AND MACHINERY LTD; AS AT 31ST MARCH 2012)

(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitative details and situation of its fixed assets.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, all the assets have not been physically verified by the management during the year but there is a regular programme of verification which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the company and the nature of its assets. To the best of our knowledge, no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

(c) The company has not disposed off substantial part of fixed assets during the year.

(ii) (a) The inventory has been physically verified during the year by the management. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is reasonable.

(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management were reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the company and the nature of its business.

(c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The discrepancies noticed on verification between the physical stocks and the book records were not material having regard to the size of the operations of the Company.

(iii) (a) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company granted loans to two Companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The maximum balance outstanding during the year was Rs. 823.40 Lakhs and the balance outstanding at the end of the year was Rs. 351.16 Lakhs.

(b) In our opinion, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions of loans given by the Company to Companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956, are not prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

(c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the parties have repaid the principal amounts as stipulated and have been regular in the payment of interest.

(d) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there is no overdue amount of loans granted to Companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(e) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not taken unsecured loan from parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Hence relevant para is not applicable to the Company.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there are

adequate internal control procedures commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of its business with regard to purchases of inventory and fixed assets and with regard to the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in internal control systems.

(v) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us, we are of the opinion that the transactions that need to be entered into the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been so entered.

(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts or arrangements entered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 and exceeding the value of rupees five lakhs in respect of any party during the year have been made at prices which are reasonable having regard to prevailing market prices at the relevant time.

(vi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not accepted any deposits from the public and hence the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and provisions of sections 58A and 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975 are not applicable.

(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with the size and nature of its business.

(viii) In our opinion and according to information and explanations given to us, the maintenance of cost records has not been prescribed, for the products of the Company, by the Central Govt. under clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 209 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(ix) (a) According to the information and explanations provided to us, the Company is regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including Provident Fund, Investor Education Protection Fund, Employees' State Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues applicable to it. And there are no arrears of outstanding statutory dues as at the last day of the financial year for a period of more then six months from the date they become payable.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, the particulars of dues of Income tax, Wealth tax, Service tax, Sales Tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty and Cess as at 31st March, 2012, which have not been deposited on account of a dispute, are as follows: -

Sr. Amount Form where dispute is No. Name of the Statute Relevant period pending

1. Central Sales Tax Act 1998-1999 63,148.00 Sales Tax Tribunal

2. Gram Panchayat Tax 2009 to 2012 3,90,747.00 Gram Panchayat

(x) The Company does not have accumulated losses and has not incurred cash losses during the financial year covered by our audit and in the immediately preceding financial year.

(xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to a financial institution, bank or debenture holders.

(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

(xiii) In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/mutual benefit fund/society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4

(xiii) of the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the company.

(xiv) In our opinion, the Company is not dealing in or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments. According the provisions of clause 4

(xiv) of the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.

(xv) According to information and explanations given to us, the Company has not givenany guarantee for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions.

(xvi) According to information and explanations given to us, the Company has applied the term loans for the purposes for which the loans were obtained.

(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, we report that the no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term investment.

(xviii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties and Companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Act during the year.

(xix) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has neither issued any debentures during the year nor issued earlier are outstanding. Accordingly, the provisions of clause

(xix) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

(xx) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not raised any money by public issue during the year.

(xxi) According to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the

Company has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.

For SHANKARLAL JAIN & ASSOCIATES

CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

Registration No. 109901W

Sd/- (S. L. AGRAWAL) PLACE : MUMBAI PARTNER

DATED : 30TH MAY, 2012 Membership Number 72184

---

Mar 31, 2010

1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of REMI PROCESS PLANT AND MACHINERY LIMITED as at 31st March, 2010, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.

4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report that:

(i) we have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;

(ii) in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

(iii) the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

(iv) in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956;

(v) On the basis of written representations received from the Directors, as on 31st March, 2010, and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March, 2010 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub- section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;

(vi) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31st March, 2010;

(b) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the PROFIT for the year ended on that date; and

(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

ANNEXURE TO THE AUDITORS REPORT

(REFERRED TO IN OUR REPORT OF EVEN DATE TO THE MEMBERS OF REMI PROCESS PLANT AND MACHINERY LTD; AS AT 31ST MARCH 2010)

(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitative details and situation of its fixed assets.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, all the assets have not been physically verified by the management during the year but there is a regular programme of verification which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the company and the nature of its assets. To the best of our knowledge, no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

(c) The company has not disposed off substantial part of fixed assets during the year.

(ii) (a) The inventory has been physically verified during the year by the management. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is reasonable.

(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management were reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the company and the nature of its business.

(c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The discrepancies noticed on verification between the physical stocks and the book records were not material having regard to the size of the operations of the Company.

(iii) (a) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company granted loans to two Companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The maximum balance outstanding during the year was Rs.108.29 Lakhs and the said loans were received back during the year.

(b) In our opinion, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions of loans given by the Company to Companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956, are not prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

(c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the parties have repaid the principal amounts as stipulated and have been regular in the payment of interest.

(d) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there is no overdue amount of loans granted to Companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(e) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not taken any loan secured or unsecured from Companies, firms or other parties. Accordingly clauses (iii) (f) & (g) of paragraph 4 of the Order are not applicable to the Company covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there are adequate internal control procedures commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of its business with regard to purchases of inventory and fixed assets and with regard to the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in internal control systems.

(v) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us, we are of the opinion that the transactions that need to be entered into the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been so entered.

(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts or arrangements entered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 and exceeding the value of rupees five lakhs in respect of any party during the year have been made at prices which are reasonable having regard to prevailing market prices at the relevant time.

(vi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not accepted any deposits from the public and hence the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and provisions of sections 58A and 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975 are not applicable.

(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with the size and nature of its business.

(viii) In our opinion and according to information and explanations given to us, the maintenance of cost records has not been prescribed, for the products of the Company, by the Central Govt, under clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 209 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(ix) (a) According to the information and explanations provided to us, the Company is regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including Provident Fund, Investor Education Protection Fund, Employees State Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues applicable to it. And there are no arrears of outstanding statutory dues as at the last day of the financial year for a period of more then six months from the date they become payable.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, the particulars of dues of Income tax, Wealth tax, Service tax, Sales Tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty and Cess as at 31st March, 2010, which have not been deposited on account of a dispute, are as follows: -

Sr. Name of the Relevant period Amount Form where dispute is No. Statute (Rs.) pending

1. Central Sales Tax Act 1998-1999 63,148.00 Sales Tax Tribunal

2. Central Sales Tax Act 2004-2005 46,255.00 Deputy Commiss ioner of Sales Tax (Appeals)

3. Central Excise Act 2007-2008 19,615.00 Commissioner (Appeals)

4. Service Tax 2004-2005 & 1,85,360.00 Commissioner (Appeals) 2005-06

5. Maharashtra Land 2006 to 2010 1,06,589.00 Tahsildar, Borivali, Revenue Act, 1966 Mumbai.

6. Disputed Lease Rent 2007 to 2010 1,94,27,677.00 Additional Commisioner, Mumbai.



(x) The Company does not have accumulated losses and has not incurred cash losses during the financial year covered by our audit and in the immediately preceding financial year.

(xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to a financial institution, bank or debenture holders.

(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities. :

(xiii) In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/mutual benefit fund/society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the company.

(xiv) In our opinion, the Company is not dealing in or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments. According the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.

(xv) According to information and explanations given to us, the Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions.

(xvi) According to information and explanations given to us, the Company has applied the term loans for the purposes for which the loans were obtained.

(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, we report that the no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term investment.

(xviii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not made any preferential allotment of snares to parties and Companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Act during the year.

(xix) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has neither issued any debentures during the year nor issued earlier are outstanding. Accordingly, the provisions of clause (xix) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

(xx) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not raised any money by public issue during the year.

(xxi) According to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.

For SHANKARLAL JAIN & ASSOCIATES

CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

(SATISH JAIN)

PARTNER

Membership Number 48874

PLACE: MUMBAI Registration No. 109901W

DATED: 21st MAY, 2010