Home  »  Company  »  Shreyans Inds.  »  Quotes  »  Auditor Report
Enter the first few characters of Company and click 'Go'

Auditor Report of Shreyans Industries Ltd.

Mar 31, 2014

1. We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Shreyans Industries Limited (''the Company'') which comprise the Balance sheet as at March 31, 2014, and the Statement of profit and loss and Cash flow statement for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

2. The Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956. This responsibility includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor''s Responsibility

3. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor consider internal control relevant to the Company''s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity''s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

4. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the financial statements give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act”) in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India;

i) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the company as at March 31, 2014;

ii) in the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the profit for the year ended on that date; and

iii) in the case of Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

5. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 (as amended) ("the Order”) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Company Act 1956, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.

6. As required by section 227(3) of the Companies Act, 1956, we report that:

a. We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;

b. In our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

c. The Balance sheet, Statement of profit and loss, and Cash flow statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account;

d. In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956.

e. On the basis of written representations received from the directors as on March 31, 2014, and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2014, from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub- section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act 1956.

Annexure to Independent Auditors'' Report Referred to in paragraph 5 under the heading on "Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements” of our report of even date.

(i) a) The company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

b) According to information and explanations given to us, the company has adopted a policy of physical verification of fixed assets once in a block of every three years. The last verification of entire block of fixed assets was done in the year ended March 31, 2012. Further in our opinion the frequency of physical verification of the fixed assets is reasonable having regard to the size of the company and nature of its business.

c) In our opinion, and according to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not disposed off substantial part of its fixed assets during the year.

(ii) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us, the inventories have been physically verified by the management at the end of the year. In our opinion the frequency of verification is reasonable.

b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management as evidenced by the written procedures and instructions are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the company and nature of its business.

c) On the basis of our examination of the records of inventories, we are of our opinion that the company is maintaining proper records of inventories. The discrepancies noticed on physical verification of inventories as compared to book records were not material and have been properly dealt with in the books of account.

(iii) (a) The company has not granted secured or unsecured loans to companies, firm or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Therefore the provisions of clause 4 (iii) (b) (c) and (d) of the above said order are not applicable to the company.

(b) The company has taken unsecured loans from three companies and eleven parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The amount involved in the transactions is t 203.72 lacs. The amount payable as at the close of the year is 1200.72 lacs.

(c) According to the information and explanations given to us and in our opinion, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions in respect of unsecured loans taken by the company, are not prima-facie prejudicial to the interest of the company.

(d) According to the information and explanations given to us, the payment of principal amount and interest in respect of the aforesaid loans is regular.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of its business for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in internal control systems.

(v) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there are no contracts or arrangement the particulars of which need to be entered in the register maintained under that section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(v) of the above said order are not applicable to the company.

(vi) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has complied with the provisions of section 58A and 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules 1975 with regard to deposits accepted from the public. According to the information given to us, no order has been passed by the Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any Court or any other Tribunal.

(vii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the company has an internal audit system commensurate with its size and nature of its business.

(viii) We have broadly reviewed the books of account relating to materials, labour and other items of cost maintained by the company pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under section 209(1)(d) of the Companies Act, 1956 and we are of the opinion that prima facie the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have however not made a detailed examination of the records with a view to determine whether they are accurate or complete.

(ix) (a) According to the records of the company, undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor education and protection fund, employees'' state insurance, income tax, sales tax, wealth tax, service tax, custom duty, excise duty, cess and other material statutory dues applicable to the company, if any have been regularly deposited with appropriate authorities. According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of the aforesaid dues were outstanding as at March 31, 2014, for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(b) According to the records of the company, the disputed statutory dues aggregating to t 10,19,98,154 that have not been deposited on account of matters pending before the appellate authorities in respect of income tax and excise duty are given below:

Sr Nature Period to which Disputed No. Name of the Statute of Dues the amount relates Amount (Rs)

1. Central Excise Act, 1944 Excise Various years from 1999-200 to 2009-2010 10,11,46,488

2. Central Excise Act, 1944 Excise Varoious years from Duty 2088-2009 to 2010-2011 2,02,248

3. Central Excise Excise Varioue years from Act, 1944 Duty 1996-1997 to 2000-2001 52,718

4. Central Excise Act, 1944 Excise Duty 2004-2005 1,43,300

5. Income Tax Act, 1961 Income 2006-2007 4,53,400 Tax Name of the Statute Forum where Dispute is Pending.

Central Excise Act, 1944 Custom, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi

Central Excise Act, 1944 Commissioner (Appeals), Chandigarh

Central Excise Act, 1944 Joint Commissioner, Chandigarh

Central Excise Act, 1944 Assistant Commission, Ropar

Central Excise Act, 1944 Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Ludhiana

According to the information and explanations given to us, there are no disputed dues in respect of sales tax, service tax, custom duty, wealth tax and cess.

(x)The company does not have accumulated losses as at March 311, 2014. The latter part of the question relating to net worth is thus not applicable to the company. Further, the company has not incurred cash losses during the financial year covered under audit and in the immediately preceding financial year.

(xi) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to banks.

(xii) The company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xii) of the above said order are not applicable to the company.

(xiii) The company is not a chit fund, or a nidhi/mutual benefit fund/society. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4 (xiii) of the above said order are not applicable to the company.

(xiv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not dealt or traded in share, securities, debentures and other investments. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the above said order are not applicable to the company

(xv) The company has not given guarantee for loans taken by others from bank or financial institutions. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xv) of the above said order are not applicable to the company.

(xvi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the term loans taken during the year have been applied for the purpose for which they were obtained.

(xvii) According to information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the balance sheet of the

company, we report that funds raised on short term basis have not been used for long term investment.

(xviii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not made preferential allotment of shares to companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xviii) of the above said order are not applicable to the company.

(xix) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not issued debentures during the year. Accordingly the provisions of clause 4 (xix) of the above said order are not applicable to the company. (xx) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not raised money by way of public issue during the year. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4 (xx) of the above said order are not applicable to the company.

(xxi) According to the information and explanations given to us, by the management and based upon the audit procedures performed we report that no fraud on or by the company has been noticed or reported during the year.

FOR S. C. VASUDEVA & CO.

Chartered Accountants

(Regn. No. 000235N)

Place : Ludhiana (SANJIV MOHAN)

Dated : MAY 21, 2014 Partner

M. No. 86066


Mar 31, 2013

Report on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Shreyans Industries Limited (the "Company"), which comprise the Balance sheet as at March 31, 2013, the Statement of profit and loss and Cash flow statement for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements The Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956. This responsibility includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor''s Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatements.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Company''s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said financial statements read together with significant accounting policies and notes thereon give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956 in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India;

i) in the case of balance sheet, of the state of affairs of the company as at March 31, 2013;

ii) in the case of statement of profit and loss, of the profit for the year ended on that date; and

iii) in the case of cash flow statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1) As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Act, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.

2) As required by section 227(3) of the Companies Act, 1956, we report that:

a) We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;

b) In our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

c) The Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account;

d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956.

e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors as on March 31, 2013, and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2013, from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.

Annexure to the Independent Auditor''s Report

Referred to in paragraph 1 under the heading on "Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements" of our report of even date.

(i) a) The company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

b) According to information and explanations given to us, the company has adopted a policy of physical verification of fixed assets once in a block of every three years. The last verification of entire block of fixed assets was done in the year ended 31st March, 2012. In our opinion, the frequency of physical verification of the fixed assets is reasonable having regard to size of the company and nature of its business.

c) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not disposed off substantial part of its fixed assets during the year.

(ii) a) According to the information and explanations given to us, the inventories have been physically verified by the management during the year. In our opinion the frequency of verification is reasonable.

b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management as evidenced by the written procedures and instructions are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the company and nature of its business.

c) On the basis of our examination of the records of the inventories, in our opinion the company is maintaining proper records of inventories. The discrepancies noticed on physical verification as compared to book records were not material and have been properly dealt with in the books of account.

(iii) a) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not granted loans secured or unsecured to companies, firm or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly the provisions of clause 4 (iii) (b) (c) and (d) of the above said order are not applicable to the company.

b) The company has taken unsecured loans from five parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The amount involved in the transactions is Rs. 136.39 lacs. The amount payable as at the close of the year is Rs. 136.39 lacs.

c) According to the information and explanations given to us, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions in respect of unsecured loans taken by the company, are not prima-facie prejudicial to the interest of the company.

d) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the payment of principal amount and interest in respect of the aforesaid loans is regular.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the company and nature of its business, for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in internal control system.

(v) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there are no contracts or arrangement the particulars of which need to be entered in the register maintained under that section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Therefore, the provisions of clause

4(v) of the above said order are not applicable to the company.

(vi) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has complied with the provisions of section 58A and 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules 1975 with regard to deposits accepted from the public. According to the information given to us, no order has been passed by the Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any Court or any other Tribunal.

(vii) In our opinion, the company has an internal audit system commensurate with its size and nature of its business.

(viii) We have broadly reviewed the books of account relating to materials, labour and other items of cost maintained by the company pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under section 209(1)(d) of the Companies Act, 1956 and we are of the opinion that prima facie the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have however not made a detailed examination of the records with a view to determine whether they are accurate or complete.

(ix) a) According to the records of the company undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor education and protection fund, employees'' state insurance, income tax, sales tax, wealth tax, service tax, custom duty, excise duty, cess and other material statutory dues applicable to the company, if any, have been regularly deposited with appropriate authorities. According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of the aforesaid dues were outstanding as at 31st March, 2013, for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable. (x) The company does not have accumulated losses as at the end of the financial year. The company has not incurred cash losses during the financial year covered under audit and in the immediately preceding financial year.

(xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to banks, financial institutions and debenture holder''s.

(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xii) of the above said order are not applicable to the company.

(xiii) The company is not a chit fund or a nidhi mutual benefit fund/society. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4 (xiii) of the above said order are not applicable to the company.

(xiv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not dealt or traded in share, securities, debentures and other investments. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the above said order are not applicable to the company.

(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from bank or financial institutions. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xv) of the order are not applicable to the company.

(xvi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the term loans have been applied for the purpose for which they were obtained.

(xvii) In our opinion and according to information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the balance sheet of the company, we report that funds raised on short term basis have not been used for long term investment.

(xviii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not made any preferential allotment to the parties and companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of Companies Act, 1956.

(xix) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not issued debentures during the year. Accordingly the provisions of clause 4 (xix) of the above said order are not applicable to the company.

(xx) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not raised any money by way of public issue during the year. Accordingly the provisions of clause 4 (xx) of the above said order are not applicable to the company.

(xxi) According to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the company has been noticed or reported during the year.

For S. C. Vasudeva & Co.

Chartered Accountants

Firm Reg. No. 000235N Place: Ludhiana (Sanjiv Mohan)

Dated: 28th May, 2013 Partner

M. No. 86066


Mar 31, 2012

1. We have audited the attached balance sheet of Shreyans Industries Limited as at 31st March, 2012 and also the statement of profit and loss and the cash flow statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These financial statements are responsibility of the company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

3. As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 as issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraph 4 of the said order.

4. Further to our comments in the annexure referred to in paragraph 3 above, we report that :

a) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

c) The balance sheet, statement of profit and loss and cash flow statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

d) In our opinion, the balance sheet, statement of profit and loss and cash flow statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting standard referred to in companies (Accounting Standard) rules, 2006 read together with sub section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act; 1956.

e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on 31st March, 2012 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the director is disqualified as on 31st March, 2012 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub- section (1) of Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;

f) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said accounts read together with the significant accounting policies and other notes thereon give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

(i) in the case of balance sheet, of the state of affairs of the company as at 31st March, 2012;

(ii) in the case of statement of profit and loss, of the profit for the year ended on that date; and

(iii) in the case of cash flow statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Annexure to the Auditor's Report

(Referred to in paragraph 3)

(i) a) The company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

b) According to information and explanations given to us, the company has adopted a policy of physical verification of fixed assets once in every three year's The entire block of fixed assets has been physically verified by the management during the year. The discrepancies noticed on such verification where not material have been properly dealt in the books of account. In our opinion, the frequency of physical verification of the fixed assets is reasonable having regard to size of the company and nature of its business.

c) According to the information and explanations given to us the company has not disposed off substantial part of its fixed assets during the year.

(ii)(a) According to the information and explanations given to us, the inventories have been physically verified by the management during the year. In our opinion the frequency of verification is reasonable.

b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management as evidenced by the written procedures and instructions are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the company and nature of its business.

c) On the basis of our examination of the records of the inventories, In our opinion the company is maintaining proper records of inventories. The discrepancies noticed on physical verification as compared to book records were not material and have been properly dealt with in the books of account.

(iii)(a) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not granted loans secured or unsecured to companies, firm or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly the provisions of clause 4 (iii) (b) (c) and (d) of the above said order are not applicable to the company.

(b) The company has taken unsecured loans from five parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The amount involved in the transactions is ' 134.87 lacs. The amount payable as at the close of the year is ' 124.87 lacs.

(c) According to the information and explanations given to us, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions in respect of unsecured loans taken by the company, are not prima-facie prejudicial to the interest of the company.

(d) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the payment of principal amount and interest in respect of the aforesaid loans is regular.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the company and nature of its business, for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in internal control system.

(v) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there are no contracts or arrangement the particulars of which need to be entered in the register maintained under that section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(v) of the above said order are not applicable to the company

(vi) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has complied with the provisions of section 58A and 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules 1975 with regard to deposits accepted from the public. According to the information given to us, no order has been passed by the Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any Court or any other Tribunal.

(vii) In our opinion, the company has an internal audit system commensurate with its size and nature of its business.

(viii) We have broadly reviewed the books of account relating to materials, labour and other items of cost maintained by the company pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under section 209(1)(d) of the Companies Act, 1956 and we are of the opinion that prima facie the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have however not made a detailed examination of the records with a view to determine whether they are accurate or complete.

(ix) (a) According to the records of the company, undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor education and protection fund, employees' state insurance, income tax, sales tax, wealth tax, service tax, custom duty, excise duty, cess and other material statutory dues applicable to the company, if any, have been regularly deposited with appropriate authorities. According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of the aforesaid dues were outstanding as at 31st March, 2012, for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(b) According to the records of the company, the disputed statutory dues aggregating to ' 10,80,63,078 that have not been deposited on account of matters pending before the appellate authorities in respect of income tax and excise duty are as follow :

Disputed Forum where Dispute S. No. Statute Nature of Dues Amount (Rs.) is pending.

Custom, Excise & Service Tax 1 Central Excise Act, 1944 Excise Duty 105324626 Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi

2. Central Excise Act, 1944 Excise Duty 202248 Commissioner (Appeals) Chandigarh

3. Central Excise Act, 1944 Excise Duty 52718 Joint Commissioner, Chandigarh

4. Central Excise Act, 1944 Excise Duty 143300 Assistant Commission, Ropar

Commissioner of Income 5. Income Tax Act, 1961 Income Tax 2340186 Tax (Appeal), Ludhiana

According to the information and explanations given to us there are no dispute in respect of sales tax, service tax, custom duty, wealth tax and cess.

(x) The company does not have accumulated losses as at 31st March 2012. The latter part of the question relating to net worth is thus not applicable to the company. Further, the company has not incurred cash losses during the financial year covered under audit and in the immediately preceding financial year.

(xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to banks, financial institutions or debenture holder's.

(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xii) of the above said order are not applicable to the company.

(xiii) The company is not a chit fund or a nidhi mutual benefit fund/society. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4 (xiii) of the above said order are not applicable to the company.

(xiv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not dealt or traded in share, securities, debentures and other investments. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the above said order are not applicable to the company.

(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from bank or financial institutions. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xv) of the order are not applicable to the company.

(xvi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the term loans have been applied for the purpose for which they were obtained.

(xvii) In our opinion and according to information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the balance sheet of the company, we report that short term funds of ' 482.66 lacs have temporarily been utilised for long term purpose.

(xviii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not made any preferential allotment to the parties and companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of Companies Act, 1956.

(xix) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not issued debentures during the year. Accordingly the provisions of clause 4 (xix) of the above said order are not applicable to the company.

(xx) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not raised any money by way of public issue during the year. Accordingly the provisions of clause 4 (xx) of the above said order are not applicable to the company.

(xxi)According to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the company has been noticed or reported during the year.

For S. C. Vasudeva & Co.

Chartered Accountants

Firm Reg. No. 000235N

Place: Ludhiana (Sanjiv Mohan)

Dated: 28th May, 2012 Partner

M. No. 86066


Mar 31, 2011

1. We have audited the attached balance sheet of Shreyans Industries Limited as at 31st March, 2011 and also the profit and loss account and the cash flow statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These financial statements are responsibility of the company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

3. As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 as issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraph 4 of the said order.

4. Further to our comments in the annexure referred to in paragraph 3 above, we report that :

a) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

c) The balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash flow statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

d) In our opinion, the balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash flow statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting standards referred to in sub section (3C)of section 211 of the Companies Act; 1956.

e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on 31st March, 2011 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the director is disqualified as on 31st March, 2011 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub- section (1) of Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;

f)In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said accounts read together with the significant accounting policies and other notes thereon give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

(i) in the case of balance sheet, of the state of affairs of the company as at 31st March, 2011;

(ii) in the case of profit and loss account, of the profit for the year ended on that date; and

in the case of cash flow statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Annexure to the Auditor's Report (Referred to in paragraph 3)

(i) a) The company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

b) According to information and explanations given to us, the company has adopted a policy of physical verification of fixed assets once in every three years. The last verification of entire block of fixed assets was done in the year ended 31st March, 2009. In our opinion, the frequency of physical verification of the fixed assets is reasonable having regard to size of the company and nature of its business.

c) According to the information and explanations given to us the company has not disposed off substantial part of its fixed assets during the year.

(ii)(a) According to the information and explanations given to us, the inventories have been physically verified by the management during the year. In our opinion the frequency of verification is reasonable.

b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management as evidenced by the written procedures and instructions are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the company and nature of its business.

c) On the basis of our examination of the records of the inventories, In our opinion the company is maintaining proper records of inventories. The discrepancies noticed on physical verification as compared to book records were not material and have been properly dealt with in the books of account.

(iii)(a) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not granted loans secured or unsecured to companies, firm or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly the provisions of clause 4 (iii) (b) (c) and (d) of the above said order are not applicableto the company.

(b) The company has taken unsecured loans from four parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The amount involved in the transactions is Rs. 125.26 lacs. The amount payable as at the close of the year is Rs. 100.60 lacs.

(c) According to the information and explanations given to us, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions in respect of unsecured loans taken by the company, are not prima-facie prejudicial to the interest of the company.

(d) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the payment of principal amount and interest in respect of the aforesaid loans is regular.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the company and nature of its business, for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in internal control system.

(v) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there are no contract or arrangement, the particulars of which need to be entered into register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(v) of the above said order are not applicable to the company

(vi) According to the information and explanations given to us the company has complied with the provisions of section 58A and 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules 1975 with regard to deposits accepted from the public. According to the information given to us, no order has been passed by the Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any Court or any other Tribunal.

(vii) In our opinion, the company has an internal audit system commensurate with its size and nature of its business.

(viii) We have broadly reviewed the books of account relating to materials, labour and other items of cost maintained by the company pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under section 209(1)(d) of the Companies Act, 1956 and we are of the opinion that prima facie the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have however not made a detailed examination of the records with a view to determine whether they are accurate or complete.

(ix) (a) According to the records of the company, undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor education and protection fund, employees' state insurance, income tax, sales tax, wealth tax, service tax, custom duty, excise duty, cess and other material statutory dues applicable to the company, if any, have been regularly deposited with appropriate authorities. According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of the aforesaid dues were outstanding as at 31st March, 2011, for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(b) According to the records of the company, the disputed statutory dues aggregating to Rs 97211635 that have not been deposited on account of matters pending before the appellate authorities in respect of income tax and excise duty are as follow :

S. Statue Nature of Disputed Forum where Dispute No. Dues Amount is pending (Rs.)

1. Central Excise Excise Duty 92501079 Custom, Excise & Service Act, 1944 Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi

2. Central Excise Excise Duty 1170370 Commissioner (Appeals) Act, 1944 Chandigarh

3. Income Tax Income Tax 3540186 Commissioner of Income Act, 1961 Tax (Appeal), Ludhiana

According to the information and explanations given to us there are no dispute in respect of sales tax, service tax, custom duty, wealth tax and cess.

(x) The company does not have accumulated losses as at 31st March 2011. The latter part of the question relating to net worth is thus not applicable to the company. Further, the company has not incurred cash losses during the financial year covered under audit and in the immediately preceding financial year.

(xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to banks, financial institutions or debenture holders.

(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xii) of the above said order are not applicable to the company.

(xiii) The company is not a chit fund or a nidhi mutual benefit fund/society. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4 (xiii) of the above said order are not applicable to the company.

(xiv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not dealt or traded in share, securities, debentures and other investments. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the above said order are not applicable to the company.

(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from bank or financial institutions. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xv) of the order are not applicable to the company.

(xvi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the term loans have been applied for the purpose for which they were obtained.

(xvii) According to information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the balance sheet of the company, we report that no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long term investment.

(xviii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not made any preferential allotment to the parties and companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of Companies Act, 1956.

(xix) According to the information and explanations given to us the company has not issued debentures during the year. Accordingly the provisions of clause 4 (xix) of the above said order are not applicable to the company.

(xx) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not raised any money by way of public issue during the year. Accordingly the provisions of clause 4 (xx) of the above said order are not applicable to the company.

(xxi) According to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the company has been noticed or reported during the year.

FOR S. C. VASUDEVA & CO. Chartered Accountants (Firm Reg.No.000235N)

(Sanjiv Mohan) Partner M. No.86066

Place : Ludhiana Dated : 28th May 2011


Mar 31, 2010

1. We have audited the attached balance sheet of Shreyans Industries Limited as at 31st March, 2010 and also the profit and loss account and the cash flow statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These financial statements are responsibility of the companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based onouraudit.

2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An auditalso includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 as issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraph 4 of the said order.

4. Further to our comments in the annexure referred to in paragraph 3 above, we report that:

a) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

c)The balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash flow statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

d) In our opinion, the balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash flow statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting standards referred to in sub section (3C) of section 211 of the Compa nies Act; 1956.

e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on 31" March, 2010 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the director is disqualified as on 31" March, 2010 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub- section (1) of Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;

f) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said accounts read together with the significant accounting policies and other notes thereon give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India;

(i) in the case of balance sheet, of the state of affairs of the company as at 31 st Ma rch, 2010;

(ii) in the case of profit and loss account, of the profit for the year ended on that date; and

(iii) in the case of cash flow statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Annexure to the Auditors Report

(Referred to in paragraph 3) (i) a) The company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

b) According to information and explanations given to us, the company has adopted a policy of physical verification of fixed assets once in every three years. The last verification of entire block of fixed assets was done in the year ended 31 * March, 2009. In our opinion, the frequency of physical verification of the fixed assets is reasonable having regard to size of the company and nature of its business.

c) According to the information and explanations given to us the company has not disposed off substantial part of its fixed assets during the year.

(ii) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us, the inventories have been physically verified by the management during the year. In our opinion the frequencyof verification is reasonable.

b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management as evidenced by the written procedures and instructions are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the company and nature of its business.

c) On the basis of our examination of the records of the inventories, In our opinion the company is maintaining proper records of inventories. The discrepancies noticed on physical verification as compared to book records were not material and have been properly dealt with in the books of account.

(iii) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not granted loans secured or unsecured to companies, firm or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly the provisions of clause 4 (iii) (b) (c) and (d) of the above said order are not applicable to the company.

(b) The company has taken unsecured loans from one party covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The amount involved in the transactions is Rs. 47.46 lacs. The amount payable as at the close of the year is Rs. 36.63 lacs.

(c) According to the information and explanations given to us, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions in respect of unsecured loans taken by the company, are not prima-facie prejudicial to the interest of the company.

(d) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the payment of principal amount and interest in respect of the aforesaid loans is regular.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the company and nature of its business, for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in internal control system.

(v) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there are no contract or arrangement, the particulars of which need to be entered into register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(v) of the above said order are not applicable to the company

(vi) According to the information and explanations given to us the company has complied with the provisions of section 58A and 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules 1975 with regard to deposits accepted from the public. According to the information given to us, no order has been passed by the Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any Court or any other Tribunal. (vii) In our opinion, the company has an internal audit system commensurate with its size and nature of its business.

(vii) In our opinion, the company has an internal audit

Disputed Forum where

Dispute

S. No. Statute Nature of Dues Amount (Rs.) is pending.

1. Central Excise Excise Duty 79,708,605 Custom, Excise & Service Act, 1944 Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi

2. Central Excise Excise Duty 12,851,141 Commissioner (Appeals) Act, 1944 Chandigarh

3. Central Excise Excise Duty 1,52,044 Deputy Commissioner, Ropar

(viii) We have broadly reviewed the books of account relating to materials, labour and other items of cost maintained by the company pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under section 209(1)(d) of the Companies Act, 1956 and we are of the opinion that prima facie the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have however not made a detailed examination of the records with a view to determine whether they are accurate or complete.

(ix) (a) According to the records of the company, undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor education and protection fund, employees state insurance, income tax, sales tax, wealth tax, service tax, custom duty, excise duty, cess and other material statutory dues applicable to the company, if any, have been regularly deposited with appropriate authorities. According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of the aforesaid dues were outstanding as at 31" March, 2010, for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(b) According to the records of the compa ny, the disputed statutory dues aggregating to Rs 92711790 that have not been deposited on account of matters pending before the appellate authorities in respect of sales tax and excise duty a re as follow:

According to the information and explanations given to us there are no dispute in respect of income tax, service tax, custom duty, wealth tax and cess.

(x) The company does not have accumulated losses as at 31" March 2010. The latter part of the question relating to net worth is thus not applicable to the company. Further, the company has not incurred cash losses during the financial year covered under audit and in the immediately preceding financial year.

(xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to banks, financial institutions or debenture holders.

(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xii) of the above said order are not applicable to the company.

(xiii) The company is not a chit fund or a nidhi mutual benefit fund/society. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4 (xiii) of the above said order are not applicable to the company.

(xiv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not dealt or traded in share, securities, debentures and other investments. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the above said order are not applicable to the company.

(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from bank or financial institutions. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xv) of the order are not applicable to the company.

(xvi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the term loans have been applied for the purpose for which they were obtained.

(xvii) According to information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the balance sheet of the company, we report that no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long term investment.

(xviii) Pursuant to the terms of convertible equity warrants issued in previous year the company has allotted ,27,50,000 equity shares on a preferential basis to the companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of Companies Act, 1956. In our opinion and according to information given to us the price at which equity shares have been issued are not prima-facie prejudicial to the interest of the company.

(xix) According to the information and explanations given to us the company has not issued debentures during the year. Accordingly the provisions of clause 4 (xix) of the above said order are not applicable to the company.

(xx) According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not raised any money by way of public issue during the year. Accordingly the provisions of clause 4 (xx) of the above said order are not applicable to the company.

(xxi) According to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the company has been noticed or reportedduring the year.

FOR S. C. VASUDEVA & CO.

Chartered Accountants

Reg.No.00235N

Place: Ludhiana (Sanjiv Mohan)

Dated: 25th May, 2010 Partner

M. No. 86066









 
Subscribe now to get personal finance updates in your inbox!