Home  »  Company  »  Singer India  »  Quotes  »  Auditor Report
Enter the first few characters of Company and click 'Go'

Auditor Report of Singer India Ltd.

Mar 31, 2023

Singer India Limited

Report on the Audit of the Financial Statements

Opinion

We have audited the financial statements of Singer India Limited (the "Company") which comprise the balance sheet as at 31 March 2023, and the statement of profit and loss (including other comprehensive income), statement of changes in equity and statement of cash flows for the year then ended, and notes to the financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information,

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid financial statements give the information required by the Companies Act, 2013 ("Act") in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31 March 2023, and its profit

and other comprehensive loss, changes in equity and its cash flows for the year ended on that date,

Basis for Opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing (SAs) specified under Section 143(10) of the Act, Our responsibilities under those SAs are further described in the Auditor''s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our report, We are independent of the Company in accordance with the Code of Ethics issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India together with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements under the provisions of the Act and the Rules thereunder, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the Code of Ethics, We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion on the financial statements,

Key Audit Matter(s)

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the financial statements of the current period, These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters,

Revenue recognition

See Note 2(a)(xv) and note 21 to financial statements

The key audit matter

How the matter was addressed in our audit

Revenue is recognised to the extent that it is probable that the

In view of the significance of the matter, we applied the following

economic benefits will flow to the Company and the revenue

audit procedures in this area, among others to obtain sufficient

can be reliably measured, i,e, when the control of the underlying

appropriate audit evidence:

products have been transferred to the customer,

The Company focuses on revenue as a key performance measure

• Assessed the appropriateness of the revenue recognition accounting policies by comparing with applicable accounting

which could create an incentive for revenue to be recognised

standards;

before the control of underlying products has been transferred,

• Tested the design and operating effectiveness of key controls

There is a risk that revenue may be overstated because of fraud resulting from the pressure Management may feel to achieve

established by management over the completeness, accuracy and existence of revenue;

performance targets at the reporting period end,

• Inspected individual revenue transactions on sample basis, selected by applying statistical sampling, from the underlying documents that revenue has been booked correctly and in the correct period with reference to supporting invoices, underlying orders, delivery notes;

• Tested on a sample basis, the supporting documents for sales transactions recorded during the period closer to the year end to determine whether revenue was recognised in the correct period;

• Inspected post year end credit notes to ensure that revenue recognised during the year is not reversed in the subsequent period without sufficient cause;

The key audit matter

How the matter was addressed in our audit

We have considered revenue recognition as a key audit matter on account of factors as mentioned above.

• Performed analytical procedures and where appropriate, conducted further enquiries and testing;

• As part of confirmation of the existence of revenue, we also selected a sample of trade receivables and agreed to balance confirmations obtained from debtors and verified subsequent receipts and/ or delivery notes and/ or underlying invoices;

• Assessed manual journals posted to revenue to identify unusual items; and

• Assessed the adequacy and appropriateness of the disclosures made in accordance with the relevant accounting standard.


Other Information

The Company''s Management and Board of Directors are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information included in the Company''s annual report, but does not include the financial statements and auditor''s report thereon.

Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information, and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statement or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.

Management''s and Board of Directors'' Responsibilities for the Financial Statements

The Company''s Management and Board of Directors are responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Act with respect to the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the state of affairs, profit/ loss and other comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) specified under Section 133 of the Act. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding of the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the financial statements, the Management and Board of Directors are responsible for assessing the Company''s ability

to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the Board of Directors either intends to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.

The Board of Directors is also responsible for overseeing the Company''s financial reporting process.

Auditor''s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor''s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with SAs will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.

As part of an audit in accordance with SAs, we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. We also:

• Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.

• Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. Under Section 143(3)(i) of the Act, we are also responsible for expressing our opinion on whether the company has adequate internal financial controls with reference to financial statements in place and the operating effectiveness of such controls.

• Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by the Management and Board of Directors.

• Conclude on the appropriateness of the Management and Board of Directors use of the going concern basis of accounting in preparation of financial statements and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company''s ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor''s report to the related disclosures in the financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor''s report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Company to cease to continue as a going concern.

• Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the financial statements, including the disclosures, and whether the financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.

We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.

We also provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards.

From the matters communicated with those charged with governance, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditor''s report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2020 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of Section 143(11) of the Act, we give in the "Annexure A" a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order, to the extent applicable.

2 A. As required by Section 143(3) of the Act, we report that:

a. We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit.

b. In our opinion, proper books of account as required

by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books, except that the back-up of one application used at a particular location which forms part of the ''books of account and other relevant books and papers in electronic mode'' has not been maintained on daily basis.

c. The balance sheet, the statement of profit and loss (including other comprehensive income), the statement of changes in equity and the statement of cash flows dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account.

d. In our opinion, the aforesaid financial statements comply with the Ind AS specified under Section 133 of the Act.

e. On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on 31 March 2023 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31 March 2023 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164(2) of the Act.

f. The qualification relating to the maintenance of accounts and other matters connected therewith are as stated in the paragraph 2A(b) above.

g. With respect to the adequacy of the internal financial controls with reference to financial statements of the Company and the operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to our separate Report in "Annexure B"

B. With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor''s Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

a. The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations as at 31 March 2023 on its financial position in its financial statements - Refer Note 31 to the financial statements.

b. The Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses.

c. There has been no delay in transferring amounts, required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.

d (i) The management has represented that, to the best of its knowledge and belief, as disclosed in the Note 43 (vi) to the financial statements, no funds have been advanced or loaned or invested (either from borrowed funds or share premium or any other sources or kind of funds) by the Company to or in any other person(s) or entity(ies), including foreign entities ("Intermediaries"), with the understanding, whether recorded in writing or otherwise, that

the Intermediary shall directly or indirectly lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or on behalf of the Company ("Ultimate Beneficiaries") or provide any guarantee, security or the like on behalf of the Ultimate Beneficiaries,

(ii) The management has represented that, to the best of its knowledge and belief, as disclosed in the Note 43 (vii) to the financial statements, no funds have been received by the Company from any person(s) or entity(ies), including foreign entities ("Funding Parties"), with the understanding, whether recorded in writing or otherwise, that the Company shall directly or indirectly, lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or on behalf of the Funding Parties ("Ultimate Beneficiaries") or provide any guarantee, security or the like on behalf of the Ultimate Beneficiaries,

(iii) Based on the audit procedures performed that have been considered reasonable and appropriate in the circumstances, nothing has come to our notice that has caused us to believe that the representations under sub-clause (i) and (ii) of Rule 11(e), as provided under (i) and (ii) above, contain any material misstatement,

e, The final dividend paid by the Company during the year, in respect of the dividend declared for the previous year, is in accordance with Section 123 of the Act to the extent it applies to payment of dividend, The Company has not declared any dividend in respect of the current year,

f, As proviso to rule 3(1) of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014 is applicable for the Company only with effect from 1 April 2023, reporting under Rule 11(g) of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014 is not applicable,

C, With respect to the matter to be included in the Auditor''s Report under Section 197(16) of the Act:

In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the remuneration paid by the Company to its directors during the current year is in accordance with the provisions of Section 197 of the Act, The remuneration paid to any director is not in excess of the limit laid down under Section 197 of the Act, The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has not prescribed other details under Section 197(16) of the Act which are required to be commented upon by us,

For B S R & Co. LLP

Chartered Accountants Firm''s Registration No,:101248W/W-100022

Kanika Kohli

Partner

Place: New Delhi Membership No,: 511565

Date: 24 May 2023 ICAI UDIN:23511565BGYGHS9883


Mar 31, 2018

Report on the Audit of the Ind AS Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying Ind AS financial statements of Singer India Limited (“the Company”), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 31 March 2018, the Statement of Profit and Loss, the Statement of Changes in Equity and the Statement of Cash Flows for the year then ended, and summary of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory information (hereinafter referred to as “Ind AS financial statements”).

Management’s Responsibility for the Ind AS Financial Statements

The Company’s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 (“the Act”) with respect to the preparation of these Ind AS financial statements that give a true and fair view of the state of affairs, profit and other comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) prescribed under Section 133 of the Act.

This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the Ind AS financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the Ind AS financial statements, management is responsible for assessing the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless management either intends to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.

Auditors’ Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these Ind AS financial statements based on our audit.

We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made thereunder.

We conducted our audit of the Ind AS financial statements in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the Ind AS financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the Ind AS financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the Ind AS financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant to the Company’s preparation of the Ind AS financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Company’s Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the Ind AS financial statements.

We are also responsible to conclude on the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists,

we are required to draw attention in the auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the Ind AS financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify the opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of the auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions may cause an entity to cease to continue as a going concern.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the Ind AS financial statements.

opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid Ind AS financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31 March 2018 and its profits and other comprehensive income, changes in equity and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.

other Matter

The comparative financial information of the Company for the year ended 31 March 2017 and the transition date opening balance sheet as at 1 April 2016 included in these Ind AS Financial Statements, are based on the previously issued Statutory Financial Statements prepared in accordance with the Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2006 audited by the predecessor auditor whose report for the year ended 31 March 2017 and 31 March 2016 dated 18 May 2017 and 28 May 2016 respectively expressed an unmodified opinion on those financial statements, as adjusted for differences in the accounting principles adopted by the Company on transition to Ind AS, which have been audited by us.

Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter.

Report on other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order, 2016 (‘the Order’), issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (11) of Section 143 of the Act, we give in “Annexure A”, a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.

2. As required by Section 143 (3) of the Act, we report that:

a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books;

c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss, the Statement of Cash Flows and the Statement of Changes in Equity dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account;

d) In our opinion, the aforesaid Ind AS financial statements comply with the Indian Accounting Standards prescribed under Section 133 of the Act;

e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on 31 March 2018 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31 March 2018 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164 (2) of the Act;

f) With respect to the adequacy of the internal financial controls with reference to Ind AS financial statements of the Company and the operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to our separate Report in “Annexure B”; and

g) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditors Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i. The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position in its Ind AS financial statements - Refer Note 31 to the standalone Ind AS financial statements;

ii. The Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses;

iii. There has been no delay in transferring amounts, required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company; and

iv. The disclosures in the Ind AS Financial Statements regarding holdings as well as dealings in specified bank notes during the period from 8 November 2016 to 30 December 2016 have not been made since they do not pertain to the financial year ended 31 March 2018. However, amounts as appearing in the audited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 March 2017 have been disclosed - Refer Note 38 to the Ind AS Financial Statements.

Annexure a referred to in our Independent auditors’ Report to the members of Singer India Limited on the Ind As financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2018

(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) The Company has a regular programme of physical verification of its fixed assets by which all fixed assets are verified on an annual basis. In our opinion, this periodicity of physical verification by management is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. In accordance with this programme, fixed assets were physically verified during the year. As informed to us, no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

(c) According to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of our examination of the records of the Company, the title deeds of immovable properties included in fixed assets are held in the name of the Company.

(ii) Inventories, except for goods-in-transit have been physically verified by the management during the year. In our opinion, the frequency of such verification is reasonable. According to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures for physical verification of inventories followed by the management during the year are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business. The discrepancies noticed on verification between the physical stocks and the book records were not material and have been properly adjusted in the books of account.

(iii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to companies, firms, limited liability partnerships or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013. Accordingly, the provisions of paragraph 3 (iii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

(iv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not given any loan, or made any investments, or provided any guarantee or security as specified under section 185 and 186 of the Companies Act, 2013. Accordingly, the provisions of paragraph 3 (iv) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

(v) As per the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not accepted any deposits as mentioned in the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and the provisions of section 73 to 76 or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and the rules framed there under. Accordingly, paragraph 3(v) of the Order is not applicable.

(vi) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost records under sub-section (1) of section 148 of the Companies Act, 2013, for any of the services rendered or goods sold by the Company. Accordingly, paragraph 3(vi) of the Order is not applicable.

(vii) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of our examination of the records of the Company, amounts deducted/ accrued in the books of account in respect of undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, employees’ state insurance, income tax, sales tax, service tax, goods and services tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value added taxes, cess and other statutory dues have generally been regularly deposited during the year by the Company with the appropriate authorities though there has been a slight delay in deposit of goods and services tax in a few cases.

According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of provident fund, employees’ state insurance, income tax, sales tax, service tax, goods and services tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value added taxes, cess and other statutory dues were in arrears as at 31 March 2018 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, there are no dues of income tax, service tax, goods and services tax, sales tax, value added tax, duty of excise and duty of customs which have not been deposited by the Company with the appropriate authorities on account of any dispute as at 31 March 2018, other than those mentioned as follows:

Statement of disputed tax dues

Name of the Statute

Nature of the dues

Amount (Rs. in Lakhs)

Amount paid under protest (Rs. in Lakhs)

period to which the amount relates

Forum where dispute is pending

Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004

Interest and Penalty

1.82

-

Financial year (FY) 2005-06

Assistant Commissioner, Delhi

Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004

Value Added Tax

2.66

2.66

FY 2008-09

Tribunal Board, Delhi

Central Sales Tax Act,1956

Central Sales Tax

7.60

-

FY 1992-93

Tribunal Board, West Bengal

Central Sales Tax Act,1956

Central Sales Tax

1.40

-

FY 2002-03

Tribunal Board, West Bengal

West Bengal Value Added Tax Act, 2003

Value Added Tax

2.38

FY 2007-08

Tribunal Board, West Bengal

West Bengal Value Added Tax Act, 2003

Value Added Tax

2.37

FY 2009-10

Tribunal Board, West Bengal

West Bengal Value Added Tax Act, 2003

Value Added Tax

3.20

FY 2010-11

Joint Commissioner Commercial Taxes, Kolkata

West Bengal Value Added Tax Act, 2003

Value Added Tax

3.42

FY 2011-12

Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, West Bengal

Central Sales Tax Act,1956

Central Sales Tax

1.63

-

FY 1992-93

Commissioner of Commercial Tax, Mumbai

Central Sales Tax Act,1956

Central Sales Tax

0.34

-

FY 1996-97

Commissioner of Commercial Tax, Mumbai

The Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002

Sales Tax

37.65

FY 2004-05

Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Mumbai

Goa sales tax act, 1964

Sales tax and interest

0.13

-

FY 2002-03

Commissioner of Commercial Tax, Goa

Central Sales Tax Act,1956

Central Sales Tax and interest

33.68

8.13

FY 2003-04

Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) Commercial Taxes, Cuttack

Central Sales Tax Act,1956

Central Sales Tax and interest

16.91

5.07

FY 2004-05

Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Kerala

Central Sales Tax Act,1956

Central Sales Tax

0.47

0.20

FY 2009-10

Assistant Commissioner, Kerala

Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2004

Value Added Tax

0.57

0.57

FY 2010-11

Assistant Commissioner, Kerala

Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2004

Penalty on truck seizure

1.49

1.49

FY 2011-12

Commissioner of Commercial Tax, Kerala

Central Sales Tax Act,1956

Central Sales Tax

7.73

-

FY 2011-12

Commissioner of Commercial Tax, Kerala

Central Sales Tax Act,1956

Central Sales Tax

13.23

2.01

FY 2012-13

Commissioner of Commercial Tax, Kerala

Haryana Value Added tax Act, 2003

Penalty on Value Added Tax

0.36

0.36

FY 2012-13

Joint Excise and Taxation Commissioner (Appeals)

Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947

Sales Tax

38.40

FY 2003-04

Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Cuttack

Central Sales Tax Act,1956

Central Sales Tax

0.76

FY 2003-04

Joint Commissioner of Sales tax, Cuttack

Orissa Entry Tax Act, 1999

Orissa Entry Tax

12.33

FY 2003-04

Commissioner of Commercial Tax, Orissa

Central Sales Tax Act,1956

Central Sales Tax

1.33

1.33

FY 2012-13

Assistant Commissioner, Annai Salai, Chennai

Central Sales Tax Act,1956

Central Sales Tax

1.09

1.09

FY 2013-14

Assistant Commissioner, Annai Salai, Chennai

(viii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of our examination of the records of the Company, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of loans or borrowings to banks. Further, no loans or borrowings were taken from financial institutions, government and there were no debentures issued during the year or outstanding as at 31 March 2018.

(ix) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of our examination of the records, the Company did not raise any money by way of initial public offer or further public offer (including debt instruments) during the year. Moreover, the term loans taken by the Company have been applied for the purposes for which they was raised.

(x) According to the information and explanations given to us, no material fraud by the Company or on the Company by its officers or employees has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.

(xi) According to information and explanations given to us and on the basis of our examination of the records of the Company, the managerial remuneration has been provided and paid by the Company in accordance with the provisions of section 197 read with Schedule V to the Companies Act, 2013.

(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company is not a nidhi company. Accordingly, paragraph 3(xii) of the Order is not applicable.

(xiii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of our examination of the records of the Company, the transactions with the related parties are in compliance with sections 177 and 188 of the Companies Act, 2013 where applicable and the details have been disclosed in the Ind AS financial statements as required by the accounting standards.

(xiv) According to the information and explanation given to us and on the basis of our examination of the records of the Company, the Company has not made any preferential allotment or private placement of shares or fully or partly convertible debentures during the current year. Accordingly, paragraph 3(xiv) of the Order is not applicable.

(xv) According to information and explanations given to us, the Company has not entered into any non-cash transactions with directors or persons connected with them. Accordingly, paragraph 3(xv) of the Order is not applicable.

(xvi) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company is not required to be registered under section 45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934.

Annexure B to the Independent Auditors’ Report of even date on the Ind AS financial statements of Singer India Limited

Report on the Internal Financial Controls under Clause (i) of Sub-section 3 of Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 (“the Act”)

We have audited the internal financial controls with reference to the Ind AS financial statements of Singer India Limited (“the Company”) as of 31 March 2018 in conjunction with our audit of the Ind AS financial statements of the Company for the year ended on that date.

Management’s Responsibility for Internal Financial Controls

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal financial controls based on the internal control with reference to the financial statements criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting (the “Guidance Note”) issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (“ICAI”). These responsibilities include the design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls that were operating effectively for ensuring the orderly and efficient conduct of its business, including adherence to Company’s policies, the safeguarding of its assets, the prevention and detection of frauds and errors, the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, and the timely preparation of reliable financial information, as required under the Act.

Auditors’ Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal financial controls with reference to the Ind AS financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Guidance Note and the Standards on Auditing, issued by ICAI and deemed to be prescribed under section 143(10) of the Companies Act, 2013, to the extent applicable to an audit of internal financial controls, both applicable to an audit of Internal Financial Controls and, both issued by the ICAI.

Those Standards and the Guidance Note require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether adequate internal financial controls with reference to the Ind AS financial statements was established and maintained and if such controls operated effectively in all material respects.

Our audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the adequacy of the internal financial controls system with reference to the Ind AS financial statements and their operating effectiveness. Our audit of internal financial controls with reference to the Ind AS financial statements included obtaining an understanding of internal financial controls with reference to the Ind AS financial statements, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the Ind AS financial statements, whether due to fraud or error.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the Company’s internal financial controls system with reference to the Ind AS financial statements.

Meaning of Internal Financial Controls with reference to the Ind AS financial statements

A company’s internal financial control with reference to the Ind AS financial statements is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal financial control with reference to the Ind AS financial statements includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorisations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorised acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Inherent Limitations of Internal Financial Controls with reference to the Ind As financial statements

Because of the inherent limitations of internal financial controls with reference to the Ind AS financial statements, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of the internal financial controls with reference to the Ind AS financial statements to future periods are subject to the risk that the internal financial control with reference to the Ind AS financial statements may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

opinion

In our opinion, the Company has, in all material respects, an adequate internal financial controls system with reference to the Ind AS financial statements and such internal financial controls with reference to the Ind AS financial statements were operating effectively as at 31 March 2018, based on the internal control with reference to the Ind AS financial statements criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.

For B S R & Co. LLp

Chartered Accountants

Firm registration number: 101248W / W-100022

Place: Gurugram Jiten Chopra

Date: 28 May 2018 Partner

Membership number: 092894


Mar 31, 2017

To the Members of Singer India Limited

Report on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Singer India Limited (“the Company”), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 31st March, 2017, the Statement of Profit and Loss, the Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

The Company’s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 (“the Act”) with respect to the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor''s Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made there under.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant to the Company''s preparation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Company’s Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the financial statements.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31st March, 2017 and its profit and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order 2016, issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-Section (11) of Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 (''the Act'') we give in the Annexure-A a statement on the matters specified in paragraph 3 & 4 of the said Order.

2. As required by Section 143 (3) of the Act, we report that:

(a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit.

(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books.

(c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account.

(d) In our opinion, the aforesaid financial statements comply with the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014.

(e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on 31st March, 2017 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March, 2017 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164 (2) of the Act.

(f) With respect to the adequacy of internal financial controls over financial reporting of the Company and operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to our separate report in Annexure-B, and

(g) The Company has provided requisite disclosure in the financial statement as to holdings as well as dealings in Specified Bank Notes during the period 8th November 2016 to 30th December, 2016. Based on audit procedures and relying on management representation, we report that the disclosures are in accordance with books of account maintained by the Company and as produced to us by the management (Note 51).

(h) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor''s Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i. The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigation on its financial position in its financial statement as referred to in Note 31A (i) and Note 36 to the financial statement.

ii. The Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses.

iii. There are no amounts required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company as such the question of delay does not arise.

Annexure-A to Auditors'' report of Singer India Limited

The Annexure referred to in Independent Auditors'' Report to the members of the Company on the financial statements for the year ended 31st March 2017, we report that

(i). (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) The Fixed Assets of the Company have been physically verified by the management during the year which in our opinion is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. No discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

(c) According to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of our examination of the records of the Company, the title deeds of immovable properties are held in the name of the Company.

(ii). The inventory (excluding stock in transit) has been physically verified by the management during the year. Stock in transit as at 31st March, 2017 has been verified with reference to subsequent receipt of goods or other relevant documents. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is reasonable. The discrepancies noticed during the physical verification of inventories as compared to book records were not material and have been properly dealt with in books of account.

(iii). The Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to companies, firms, Limited Liability Partnership or other parties covered in the register maintained under Section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013. Accordingly, paragraph 3 (iii) (a to c) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not given loans, guarantees and security in accordance of section 185 and 186 of the Companies Act, 2013. Accordingly, paragraph 3 (iv) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

(v). The directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and the provisions of sections 73 to 76 or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act 2013 and the rules framed there under, to the extent applicable, had been complied with by the Company.

(vi). The Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost records by the Company under Section 148 (1) of the Companies Act, 2013. Accordingly, paragraph 3 (vi) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

(vii). (a) The company is generally regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor education and protection fund, employees'' state insurance, income tax, value added tax / sales tax, wealth tax, service tax, custom duty, excise duty, cess and other material statutory dues applicable to it. Though there have been instances of non-deduction of tax at source.

According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of provident fund, income tax, sales tax, value added tax, duty of customs, service tax, cess and other material statutory dues were in arrears as at 31st March 2017 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(b) According to the records of the company, there are no dues of Sale tax/Value Added tax, Income-tax, Customs duty, Service tax, Excise duty and Cess which have not been deposited on account of any dispute.

Nature of Statute

Nature of Dues

Year

Forum before which dispute pending

Amount (Rupees in lacs)

Value Added Tax / Sales

Sales Tax

2005-06

First Appellate Authority, Delhi

1.82

Tax of Various States

Sales Tax

1992-93,2002-03, 2007-08

Tribunal Board, West Bengal

11.38

Sales Tax

2009-10

First Appellate Authority, West Bengal

2.37

Sales Tax

2010-11

Tribunal Board, West Bengal

3.20

Sales Tax

2011-12

JCCT, West Bengal

3.42

Sales Tax

1992-93,1996-97

STO, Mumbai

1.97

Sales Tax

2004-05

Joint Commissioner Appeal 1,Mumbai, Maharashtra

37.65

Sales Tax

2002-03

Assistant Commissioner, Goa

0.13

Sales Tax

2000-01

First Appellate Authority, Calicut

0.43

Sale Tax

2003-04,2004-05, 2009-10

Second Appellate Authority, Calicut

51.06

Sales Tax

2012-13 & 2013-14

ACCT, Annai Salai, Chennai

2.42

Sales Tax

2003-04

Joint Commissioner Appeal, Bhubaneshwar

38.40

Total

154.25

(viii) The Company has not defaulted in repayment of loans or borrowings to a bank. The Company has not taken any loan from financial institution, Government or due to debenture holders during the year.

(ix) The Company did not raise any money by way of initial public offer or further public offer (including debt instruments) and term loans during the year. Accordingly, paragraph 3 (ix) of the Order is not applicable to the Company. The Company has however created cash credit and working capital demand loan facility from banks which were applied for the purposes for which these were taken.

(x) According to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud by the Company or on the Company by its officers or employees have been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.

(xi) Based on our examinations of the records of the Company, the Company has paid/provided for managerial remuneration in accordance with the requisite approvals mandated by the provisions of section 197 read with Schedule V to the Companies Act.

(xii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company is not a nidhi company. Accordingly, paragraph 3 (xii) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

(xiii) According to the information and explanations given to us and based on our examination of the records of the Company, transactions with the related parties are generally in compliance with sections 177 and 188 of the Act and details of such transactions have been disclosed in the financial statements as required by the applicable accounting standards.

(xiv) According to the information and explanations given to us and based on our examination of the records of the Company, the Company has not made any preferential allotment or private placement of shares or fully or partly convertible debentures during the period. Accordingly, paragraph 3 (xiv) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us and based on our examination of the records of the Company, the Company has not entered into non-cash transactions with directors or persons connected with him. Accordingly, paragraph 3 (xv) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

(xvi) The Company is not required to be registered under section 45-1A of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934.

Annexure-B to the Auditors'' Report of Singer India Limited

Report on the Internal Financial Controls under Clause (i) of Sub-section 3 of Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 (“the Act”)

We have audited the internal financial controls over financial reporting of Singer India Limited (“the Company”) as of March 31, 2017 in conjunction with our audit of the financial statements of the Company for the year ended on that date.

Management''s Responsibility for Internal Financial Controls

The Company''s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal financial controls based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (''ICAI''). These responsibilities include the design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls that were operating effectively for ensuring the orderly and efficient conduct of its business, including adherence to company''s policies, the safeguarding of its assets, the prevention and detection of frauds and errors, the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, and the timely preparation of reliable financial information, as required under the Companies Act, 2013.

Auditors'' Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company''s internal financial controls over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting (the “Guidance Note”) and the Standards on Auditing, issued by ICAI and deemed to be prescribed under section 143(10) of the Companies Act, 2013, to the extent applicable to an audit of internal financial controls, both applicable to an audit of Internal Financial Controls and, both issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards and the Guidance Note require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether adequate internal financial controls over financial reporting was established and maintained and if such controls operated effectively in all material respects.

Our audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the adequacy of the internal financial controls system over financial reporting and their operating effectiveness. Our audit of internal financial controls over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal financial controls over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the Company''s internal financial controls system over financial reporting.

Meaning of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting

A company''s internal financial control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company''s internal financial control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company''s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Inherent Limitations of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting

Because of the inherent limitations of internal financial controls over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of the internal financial controls over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the internal financial control over financial reporting may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Opinion

In our opinion, the Company has, in all material respects, an adequate internal financial controls system over financial reporting and such internal financial controls over financial reporting were operating effectively as at March 31, 2017, based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.

For RAY & RAY

Chartered Accountants

Firm Registration no. 301072E

Place: New Delhi (A. K. Sharma)

Date: 18th May, 2017 Partner

Membership no. 80085


Mar 31, 2016

To the Members of Singer India Limited

Report on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Singer India Limited (“the Company”), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 31st March, 2016, the Statement of Profit and Loss (Nine Months), the Cash Flow Statement for the period/year then ended, and a summary of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

The Company''s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 (“the Act”) with respect to the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor''s Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made there under.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant to the Company''s preparation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Company''s Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the financial statements.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31st March, 2016 and its profit (Nine Months) and its cash flows for the period/year ended on that date.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2016, issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-Section (11) of Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 (''the Act'') we give in the Annexure-A a statement on the matters specified in paragraph 3 & 4 of the said Order.

2. As required by Section 143 (3) of the Act, we report that:

(a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit.

(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books.

(c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account.

(d) In our opinion, the aforesaid financial statements comply with the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts)Rules, 2014.

(e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on 31st March, 2016 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March, 2016 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164 (2) of the Act.

(f) With respect to the adequacy of internal financial controls over financial reporting of the Company and operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to our separate report in Annexure-B, and

(g) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor''s Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i. The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigation on its financial position in its financial statement as referred to in Note 32A (i) and Note 38 to the financial statement.

ii. The Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses.

iii. There are no amounts required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company as such the question of delay does not arise.

Annexure-A to Auditors'' report of Singer India Limited

The Annexure referred to in Independent Auditors'' Report to the members of the Company on the financial statements for the period ended 31st March, 2016, we report that

(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) The Fixed Assets of the Company have been physically verified by the management during the period which in our opinion is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. No discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

(c) According to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of our examination of the records of the Company, the title deeds of immovable properties are held in the name of the Company.

(ii) The inventory (excluding stock in transit) has been physically verified by the management during the period. Stock in transit as at 31st March, 2016 has been verified with reference to subsequent receipt of goods or other relevant documents. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is reasonable. The discrepancies noticed during the physical verification of inventories as compared to book records were not material and have been properly dealt with in books of account.

(iii) The Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to companies, firms, Limited Liability Partnership or other parties covered in the register maintained under Section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013. Accordingly, paragraph 3 (iii) (a to c) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not given loans, guarantees and security in accordance of section 185 and 186 of the Companies Act, 2013. Accordingly, paragraph 3 (iv) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

(v) The directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and the provisions of sections 73 to 76 or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and the rules framed there under, to the extent applicable, had been complied with by the Company.

(vi) The Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost records by the Company under Section 148 (1) of the Companies Act, 2013. Accordingly, paragraph 3 (vi) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

(vii) (a) The company is generally regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor education and protection fund, employees'' state insurance, income tax, value added tax / sales tax, wealth tax, service tax, custom duty, excise duty, cess and other material statutory dues applicable to it. Though there have been instances of non-deduction of tax at source.

According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of provident fund, income tax, sales tax, value added tax, duty of customs, service tax, cess and other material statutory dues were in arrears as at 31st March, 2016 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(b) According to the records of the company, there are no dues of Sale tax/Value Added tax, Income-tax, Customs duty, Service tax, Excise duty and Cess which have not been deposited on account of any dispute.

Nature of Statute

Nature of Dues

Year

Forum before which dispute pending

Amount (Rs in lacs)

Value Added Tax / Sales Tax of

Sales Tax

2005-06

First Appellate Authority, Delhi

1.82

Various States

Sales Tax

1992-93,2002-03,

2007-08

First Appellate Authority, West Bengal

9.94

Sales Tax

1995-96

Appellate Tribunal,West Bengal

14.79

Sales Tax

2009-10

First Appellate Authority, West Bengal

2.37

Sales Tax

2010-11

First Appellate Authority,West Bengal

3.20

Sales Tax

2011-12

First Appellate Authority, West Bengal

3.42

Sales Tax

1992-93,

1996-97

First Appellate Authority, Maharashtra

1.97

Sales Tax

2004-05

Joint Commissioner Appeal 1,Mumbai, Maharashtra

37.65

Sales Tax

2002-03

First Appellate Authority, Goa

0.13

Sales Tax

2000-01

First Appellate Authority, Cochin

0.43

Sale Tax

2003-04,2004-05,

2009-10

First Appellate Authority, Cochin

48.68

Sales Tax

2011-12

First Appellate Authority, Jaipur

7.85

Sales Tax

2012-13

Assistant Commissioner, Circle 3, Jaipur

8.84

Sales Tax

2003-04

Joint Commissioner Appeal 1,Cuttack, Orissa

38.40

Total

179.49

Central Excise Act

Excise Duty

2005-06

Appellate Authority, Delhi

60.38

Total

60.38

(viii) The Company has not defaulted in repayment of loans or borrowings to a bank.The Company has not taken any loan from financial institution, Government or due to debenture holders during the period.

(ix) The Company did not raise any money by way of initial public offer or further public offer (including debit instruments) and term loans during the period. Accordingly, paragraph 3 (ix) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

(x) According to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud by the Company or on the Company by its officers or employees have been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.

(xi) Based on our examinations of the records of the Company, the Company has paid/provided for managerial remuneration in accordance with the requisite approvals mandated by the provisions of section 197 read with Schedule V to the Companies Act.

(xii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company is not a nidhi company. Accordingly, paragraph 3 (xii) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

(xiii) According to the information and explanations given to us and based on our examination of the records of the Company, transactions with the related parties are generally in compliance with sections 177 and 188 of the Act and details of such transactions have been disclosed in the financial statements as required by the applicable accounting standards.

(xiv) According to the information and explanations given to us and based on our examination of the records of the Company, the Company has not made any preferential allotment or private placement of shares or fully or partly convertible debentures during the period. Accordingly, paragraph 3 (xiv) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us and based on our examination of the records of the Company, the Company has not entered into non-cash transactions with directors or persons connected with him. Accordingly, paragraph 3 (xv) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

(xvi) The Company is not required to be registered under section 45-1A of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934.

Annexure-B to the Auditors'' Report of Singer India Limited

Report on the Internal Financial Controls under Clause (i) of Sub-section 3 of Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 (“the Act’)

We have audited the internal financial controls over financial reporting of Singer India Limited (“the Company”) as of March 31, 2016 in conjunction with our audit of the financial statements of the Company for the period ended on that date.

Management''s Responsibility for Internal Financial Controls

The Company''s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal financial controls based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (''ICAI''). These responsibilities include the design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls that were operating effectively for ensuring the orderly and efficient conduct of its business, including adherence to company''s policies, the safeguarding of its assets, the prevention and detection of frauds and errors, the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, and the timely preparation of reliable financial information, as required under the Companies Act, 2013.

Auditors'' Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company''s internal financial controls over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting (the “Guidance Note”) and the Standards on Auditing, issued by ICAI and deemed to be prescribed under section 143(10) of the Companies Act, 2013, to the extent applicable to an audit of internal financial controls, both applicable to an audit of Internal Financial Controls and, both issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards and the Guidance Note require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether adequate internal financial controls over financial reporting was established and maintained and if such controls operated effectively in all material respects. Our audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the adequacy of the internal financial controls system over financial reporting and their operating effectiveness. Our audit of internal financial controls over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal financial controls over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the Company''s internal financial controls system over financial reporting.

Meaning of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting

A company''s internal financial control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company''s internal financial control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company''s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Inherent Limitations of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting

Because of the inherent limitations of internal financial controls over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of the internal financial controls over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the internal financial control over financial reporting may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Opinion

In our opinion, the Company has, in all material respects, an adequate internal financial controls system over financial reporting and such internal financial controls over financial reporting were operating effectively as at March 31, 2016, based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.

For RAY & RAY

Chartered Accountants

Firm Registration no. 301072E

(A. K.Sharma)

Partner

Membership no. 080085

Place: New Delhi

Date: 28.05.2016


Jun 30, 2015

Report on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of SINGER INDIA LIMITED ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 30th June, 2015, the Statement of Profit and Loss, the Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management's Responsibility for the Financial Statements

The Company's Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act") with respect to the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor's Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made thereunder.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether thefinancial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant to the Company's preparation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on whether the Company has in place an adequate internal financial controls system over financial reporting and the operating effectiveness of such controls. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Company's Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on thefinancial statements.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 30th June, 2015 and its profit and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order 2015 ('the Order'), issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-Section (11) of Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 ('the Act), we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraph 3 & 4 of the said Order.

2. As required by Section 143 (3) of the Act, we report that:

(a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit.

(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books.

(c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account.

(d) In our opinion, the aforesaidfinancial statements comply with the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014.

(e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on 30th June, 2015 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 30th June, 2015 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164 (2) of the Act.

(f) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor's Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i. The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigation on its financial position in its financial statement as referred to in Note 32A (i) and Note 38 to the financial statement.

ii. The Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses.

iii. There were no amounts which were required to be transferred to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.

ANNEXURE TO INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

Referred to Paragraph 1 under the heading of "Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements" of our report of even date

1. a) The Company has maintained proper records showing particulars, including quantitative details and situation of its fixed assets.

b) The fixed assets were physically verified during the year by the management in accordance with a regular programme of verification which, in our opinion, provides for physical verification of fixed assets at reasonable intervals having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. The discrepancies noticed on such verification which were not material have been properly dealt with in the books of account.

2. a) The inventory (excluding stock in transit) has been physically verified by the management during the year. Stock in transit as at 30th June, 2015 have been verified with reference to subsequent receipt of goods or other relevant documents. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is reasonable.

b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the Management were reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

c) The Company is maintaining proper records of its inventories. The discrepancies noticed during the physical verification of inventories as compared to book records were not material and have been properly dealt with in books of account.

3. The Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured, to Companies, firms or other parties covered in the Register maintained under Section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013. Therefore, clause (iii) (a) and (b) of paragraph 3 of the aforesaid Order are not applicable.

4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us and having regard to the explanation that for some items purchased for which comparable alternative quotations are not available because of the nature / quality of such items and delivery schedules and for sale of certain goods/services which are for the buyers specialized requirements for which suitable alternative sources are not available for comparable quotations, there are generally adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the company and nature of its business with regard to purchase of inventory, fixed assets and sale of goods and services except for accounts of Trade Payables and Trade Receivables which are under process of review/reconciliation. Subject to the above, during the course of our audit, we have neither come across nor have we been informed of any continuing failure to correct major weakness in internal control system.

5. The directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and the provisions of sections 73 to 76 or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act 2013 and the rules framed there under, to the extent applicable, had been complied with by the Company. The Hon'ble High Court of Delhi vide Order dated 19.01.2011 in relation to the Appeal filed against the Order of the Hon'ble Company law Board dated 25th June, 2009 on the composite scheme for repayment of deposits under section 58A and 58AA of the Companies Act, 1956 directing the Company to pay interest to all depositors at the contracted rate up to the date of maturity and thereafter @ 5% till the date of final instalment before 31st March, 2011. The Company has re-paid all unpaid interest on fixed deposits except 19 depositors whose principal and interest accrued thereon of Rs. 3.58 lacs is pending settlement due to non-submission of the original Fixed Deposit Receipts /indemnities

6. The Central Government has not prescribed maintenance of cost records under section 148 (i) of the Companies Act, 2013 for the Company. Accordingly, the provisions of paragraph 3 (vi) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

7. a) The Company is generally regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor education and protection fund, employees' state insurance, income tax, value added tax/ sales tax, wealth tax, service tax, custom duty, excise duty, cess and other material statutory dues applicable to it. Though there have been instances of non deduction of tax at source.

According to information and explanations given to us, there are no other undisputed amount payable in respect of provident fund, investor education & protection fund, income tax, employees state insurance, wealth tax, value added tax/ sales tax, custom duty, service tax, excise duty, cess and other statutory dues which were outstanding at the 30th June, 2015 for a period of more than six months from the date they become payable.

b) According to the information and explanations given to us, there are no dues of wealth tax, service tax, custom duty and cess which have not been deposited on account of any dispute other than disputed income tax, value added tax/sales tax and excise duty as indicated below:

Nature of Statute Nature of Year Dues

Value Added Tax / Sales Sales Tax 2005-06 Tax of Various States Sales Tax 1992-93,2002-03,2007-08

Sales Tax 1995-96

Sales Tax 2009-10

Sales Tax 2010-11

Sales Tax 2011-12

Sales Tax 1992-93,1996-97

Sales Tax 2004-05

Sales Tax 2002-03

Sales Tax 2000-01

Sales Tax 2003-04,2004-05,2009-10

Sales Tax 2011-12

Central Excise Act Excise Duty 2005-06

Nature of Statute Forum before which dispute Amount pending (Rupees in Lacs)

Value Added Tax/ Sales Tax of Various States First Appellate Authority, Delhi 1.82

First Appellate Authority, West 9.94 Bengal

Appellate Tribunal,West 14.79 Bengal

First Appellate Authority,West 2.37 Bengal

First Appellate Authority,West 3.20 Bengal

First Appellate Authority, West 3.42 Bengal

First Appellate Authority, 1.97 Maharashtra

Joint Commissioner Appeal 37.65 1,Mumbai, Maharashtra

First Appellate Authority, Goa 0.13

First Appellate Authority, 0.43 Cochin

First Appellate Authority, 48.68 Cochin

First Appellate Authority, Jaipur 7.85

Total 132.25

Central Excise Act Appellate Authority, Delhi 60.38

Total 60.38

c) According to the information and explanations given to us, there are no dues of Investor Education and Protection Fund which are required to be transferred in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) and rules made thereunder.

8. The Company has no accumulated losses as at 30th June, 2015 and it has not incurred any cash losses in the financial year ended on that date or in the immediately preceding financial year.

9. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to banks. There are no debentures holders.

10. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions. Accordingly, paragraph 3 (x) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

11. The Company did not have any term loans during the year. Accordingly, the provisions of para 3 (xi) of the Order are not applicable.

12. According to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.

For RAY & RAY

Chartered Accountants Firm Registration no. 301072E

(A.K. Sharma)

Place: New Delhi Partner

Date: 27th August, 2015 Membership no. 080085


Jun 30, 2014

We have audited the accompanying Financial statements of Singer incfa Limited ("the Company"), which comprise ine Ba ianoc Shoot as at J u ne 30. 2014. me Statement of Front and Loss and Cash Flaw Statement for ihe year than anded and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management's Responsibility for the Financial Statements

Management is responsible for The preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, Financial performance and cash Flows of the Company in accordance wilh the Accounting standards referred to in sub-section {3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act 1956 (the'Act') read with General Circular 15V2013 dated 13th September 2013 of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs in respect of Section 133 al the Companies Act. 2013. This res puns it)1 lily includes tut design, implementation and maintenance of Internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of the Financial statements that give a true and 1st view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor's Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements hasad on eur audit. We conducted our audit In accordance with the Standards or Auditing issued by ihe Institute of Chartered Accountants of India Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material

misstalement

An audit nvofves performing procedures tO obtain audit evidence About the amounts a ml disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's lutigmont. including the assessment of too risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due Id fraud or error In making those risk assessments, the Auditor considers internal control relevant to the Company's preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in toe circumstances hut not for toe pu tease of ex pressing an optnlcni on the effectiveness ot the ntity's internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reason ableness of the accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating Lite overall preseuto lion of the fi ne ncia I state merits

Wa believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is Sufficient and Appropriate to piteviite a basis for Our audit opinion

Basis, of Qualified Opinion

Attention is drawn to toe Note if f regarding

Ministry of Corporate Affairs vido totter deled 31st July. 2014 hss rejected the Company's application for approval of payment cf fixed retainenship fee and other bonaftde reimbursement / bertofffs to Mr K. K. Gupta, Non-Exticulivo ector for toe period tsf January, 2013 ro 3isi December 2013 which LVA duly approved hy the shareholders on l2h November. 2013 Mr ff fC Gupto was paid a sum of Rs. 25.61 lacs (including Rs 7A2 toes for earii'cr years} ntf 30.06.2014 and is holding the remuneration in truss of on behalf of too Company. The Company has made an application for re- consideration and review on 21st August. 2014 to Ministry ol Corporate Adairs in this regard. The effect of toe shove observations is presently unascodainable.

Qualified Opinion

to cure opinion and to toe besf of our information and according to too explanations given to us except for the effect of too irraffers described in the baser of Qualified Opinion paragraph Ihe financial statements give the information required by the Act read with General Circular 0822014 dated 4 4.2014 issued by Ministry of Corporate Affairs in toe manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally acceptedin India.

(a) m the case of toe Balance Sheer, of tha stole of pfhirsoUhpCcimpanyaSAtJune 30, 2014 and:

(b) in the case of the Statement Of Profit and LOSS, of toe profit for the year ended on that date: and

c) in the case of toe Cash Flow Statement, of toe cash flews for the yearended on tha t date.

Report on Othe r Legal an d Regu latory Req uireme nts

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor's Repom Order, 2003 i'the Order| issued by the Cenlral Government of I ndia in terms of sub- section (4A) of section 227 of the Act, Wd give In the Armexure a Etetemtint on Ihe matters specified in paragraph 4 and S of the Order

2. As required by section 22 7 (3) of l he Act. we report that

a we have obtained all the information end explanations wl'.ich to the best of our Knowledge and belief were fieoessary for the purpose of our audit,

B. in our opinion proper hooks of acount gs required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

c. tha B,i lance Sheet. Statement of Profit and Less and Cash F low Slalemen 1 iteflll witil try this Report are in agreemenl wilh (he books of account:

d. in our opi nion, tire Balance Sheet, Stateme ntofP refit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement comply with Ihc Accounting Standards referred to in subsection (3£) of section 211 of the Companies Act. 1956 read with General Circular 15/2013 dated 13th September 2013 of (he Ministry of Company Alton's in respect of Section t33 of the Com parties Act, 2013.

e on the basis of written represents I ions received from the ectors aS On June 30, l!Ol 4. and taken on record by the Board of ectors, none of the ectory is disqualified as on Jure 30, 2014 from being appointed as b ector in terms of dausoig) or"Sub-5ection(1) of Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1356/Section 164;2) of the Companies Ad,2013.

f since the Central Government has not issued any nvtfiicaiion as to the rate at which the cess Is to he paid u nd er section 441A of the Companies Act. 1950 nor has it issued any Rules under the said section prescribing the manner in which such cess is to he paid, no cess is duo and payable by trte Company

Annexure To I ndepen dent Audito rs' Report

Referred to Paragraph 1 under the heading of Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements" of our report of even dale

1 a) The Company has generally maintained

proper records showing particulars, including quantiigiive details and equation of fixed assets tying at its Jammu factory and other i locations

b) Thy fixed assets were physically verified during lhe year by the management in accordance with a programme of verification which in our opinion, provices for physical verification of major fixed assals at reasonable intervals having regard to lhe sire of lhe Company and the nature of its assets. The discrepancies noticed on such verification which were not mater al have been properly dealt with in the books of account.

c) Tho fixed assel& disposed off during 1 he year, mour opinion, do not constitute a substantial part of lhe fixed ysseis erf the Company'anti such disposal has. m our opinion, nol affected the going concern status of the Company

2 a) The inventory (excluding stock m transit) has been physically verified by the management during lhe year Stock m trans=t as al 30th Juno. 2014 have been verified with reference to s u bsaquent receipt of goods df Other rdtovarl dPeuinerLs. In our opinion, the trequency of verification is reasonable

b) In our-Opinion -md ecOOrding to the inlnrmglion and explanations given to us. the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the Management were reasonable and adequate in relation to me sue ol the Company and the nature of its business

c) m out opmion and according to the information end explanations given to u-s. the Company is maintaining proper records of its Inventories The discrepancies noticed during me physical verification of inven tones as compared to book records were not material and have been properly dealt within books of account.

3. a) According to the i nformation and explanations gi ven

to us. the Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured. to companies, firms or other parties listed in |ne register maintained under Section 3D1 of the Companies Act, 1956 AecbnJingty, the provisions of sub-ciausc (a), (h) (c) and (d) of paragraph * (IH) of the Order are net applicable to the Company

b) According to the inform a Lion and explanations given to us, the Compan y has not ta ken any loans, secu rod or unsecured, from com u a nias, firms or oilier parlies || Sled in the rSfll Ster main la ined under Section 301 o1 the Companies Act. 1956 Accordingly, the provisions of su tbciause (e f, (f) ana (gk of paragraph

4 ii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

4. In Out opinion and according In the Inhumation and explanations given to ug end having regard to the explanation thal for some items purchased for which comparahte alternative quotations arc not available because of the nature I quality of such items and delivery schedules and for sale df Certain goOdsJservicea which are tor the buyers specialized requirements, for which suitable a ternative sources are not available for comparable quotations, mere are generally adequate internal control system cymmtiOBjrate wtttt the su* of lhe company and nature of its business with regard to purchase of inventory, fixed assets and sale of goods and services except foe accounts of Trade Payables which are under process of revieWreconcihation Subfect to the a bove, during the C(hj me of nur a urfit, we have neither come across nor have we been informed of any continuing failure to correct major weakness i n internal oontroi system.

5. a) On Lhe basis of our examination of Lhe books of

account and according to the information gnd explanations given to us, we are of me opinion that the particulars of contracts or arrangements thal need to tie entered into the -register maintained under Section 301 of this Act have been so entered.

b} In our opinion and according to lhe information and explanations given to us, the transaction made In pursuance of contacts or arrangements entered in the register maintained under section 301 of Companies Ad, 1956 do not exceed i by vnige of Fta,

5 lacs in reaped of any party in any one iinancrsl year. Accordingly, the provisions of sub clause (b) of para graph 4 (v) of the Order are not a pplicablc to the Company.

6 The ectives issued by (he Reserve Bank of Ind' i and the provisions of sections 5SA. S3AAand other relevant provisions of the Act and the rules framed there under, to the extent appl ica ble, had been compli ed wilh by the Company. The Hon' ble Hig h Court of Delhi vide Order doted 19.01.2DT1 in relation to the Appeal Ned ayainst the Ordru of lhe HoiTblo Company law Board dated 25th June, 2000 on his composite scheme for repayment of deposits under section 66A and bftAA of ihe Compart*# Act, 1956 ecting ihe Company to pay interest 1o ail depcrsitore of 1 he contracted mfe opto the date of maturity nod thereafter @5% fill the date of final installment before 31st March, 2011. The Company has re-paid alt unpaid interest on fixed deposits except 20 depositors whose principal and Interest accrued thereon of Rs 3.B6 lacs is pending settlement due lo non- submission of the original Fined Deposit Receipts .indemnifies.

7 Op the basis of the i nfe ma1 audit reports reviewed by us, we a re of ihe opinion that, the coverage of internal audit carried out by a firm of Chartered Accountants is commensurate with the size of the Company and nature of its business.

B The Centra I Government has not prgacnhed maintenance of cost records under clause f rt) of an b-aedion (i) of section 209 or 1 he Com p rties Act. 1956 for the products of the Company Accordi ngly. the provisions of paragrp ph 4 (viii) of the Order are not applicable lo the Company.

9. a) The Company Is generally regular m daposilmg with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, Investor education and protection fund, employees' stale insurance, income tax. value added tax' sales tax, wealin tax. service tax. custom duty, excise duly cess and other material statutory dues applicable to it. Though there have been instances of non deduction of lax a [source.

Further, since ttfeCerriro) Government has tin dale not preserved the amount of cess payable under Section 441 Apt the Companies An. 1956, we are not in b position to com men | upon the regularity or otherwise of the Company m depositing the same.

b. According to information and explanations given to us. there are no ether undisputed amount payable in respect of provident fund investor education 6 protection tur:n income tax, employees state insurance, weallh lax, value added tax/ satos tax, custom duty, service tax. excise duty, cess and other slatotory dues which were o-utstanding at the period end for period of more lhan six months from the date they become paya bio.

c) According to the information end explanations given to us. there are no dues of wealth lax, service tax, custom duty and cess which have not been deposited on account of any dispute other than disputed income lax. value added tax/sales tax and excise duty as indicated below:

Name of Nature Year Statute of Dues

Value Added Sales Tax 2008-09 Tax / Sales Tax of various States

Salas Tax 2005-06

Sates Tax 1902-93. 2002-03, 2007-08

Sales Tax 1995-96

Sales Tax 2009-10

Salas Tax 2010-11

Sales Tax 1992-93,1996-97, 2004-05

Sales Tex 2003-03

Sales Tgx 2000-01

Sales Tax 2003-04,2004-05, 2011-12

Total

Central Excise Act Excise Duty 2005-06

Total

Name of Nature Forum before which Amount Statute of Dues dispute pendmg (Rs. In lacs)

Value Added Sales Tax First Appellate 14.11 Tax / Sales Tax Authority, Delhi of various States

Salas Tax VAT Tribunal, Delhi 1.62

Sates Tax First Appeilate Authority, West Bengal 9.94

Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, West Bengal 1479

Sales Tax First Appellate Authority, West Bengal 1.00

Salas Tax First Appellate Authority, West Bengal 13.04

Sales Tax First Appellate Authority, Maharashtra 39.62

Sales Tex Firyi Appellate Authority, Goe 0.13

Sales Tgx First Appellate Authority, Cochin 0.43

Sales Tax First Appellate Authority. Cochin 48 21

Total 143,09

Central Excise Act Excise Duty Appellate Authority, Delhi 60.36

Total 60.36

10. The Company has no accumulated losses as at 30th Jure, 2014 and it has nut Incurred ary cash losses in ire financial year ended on Ihatdateorin ihe immediately preceding fin anna I year.

11 I n ou r opi n ion and according to Vie i nfcmna tion and expl ? r aborts g iver to us, (he Company has not defa u lied ir repayme n t of dues to financial institution s and banks. There are no debentures holders.

12 The Company ha 5 not granted loans a ri
13 I n our opinion, the Company is ncn a ebri fur d or a md h i / tnulual benefit to nd i society Accordingly. parag rapfi 4 (*jlp) of lire Order is not applicable to the Company.

14 The Company is rot dealing in oMrad'ng in shares, securities, debentures and other investments Accordingly, the provisions ofparagraph4(xiv}of lha Order are not applicable to the Company.

15. According to the i ntorma lion and explanations given to us, the Company has not given any guarantee for loans 1a ken Ely plhers from hanks or 11naftoial glitutlctos Accordi ngly, parsgraph 4 (xv) ol the 0 rder is rot a pplicable to Ihe Cnmpe ny

16. The Company did not have any term loans outstanding during ihe year. Accordingly, the provisions of paragraph 4 fxvijof ihe Orde r arc not applicable to the Company.

17 According to the information and e xpto n s i ions given !o us and on a n overal l exfimina1 ion ol ihe Bala nee Sheet of Ihe Com-pe ny, we repoh Ihatnotonds raised on short-lerrn basis have been used torlong-term investments

18 According to tho information and explanations given !o us, the Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to psrltos and compenisE/ toms covered in the Register maintained under section 301 of ihe Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, Ihe provisions of clause (xvi ii) or parag raph -I ol ihe aforesaid order are not applicable to the Company.

19. The Coir pany ho s not issued debentu res during toe year under aud11. Accord' ngly, the provis tons of clause (xix) of pa ragraph 4 of Ihe aforesaid Order are not applicable iolhs Company.

20 f he Compa ny has not raised any money by public issues d 11 n ng the period AcooTrii n gly. the pro vision s of parag raph & xx) of ihe Orde r are not a pplicable to to e Cam pa ny.

21 During the course of our examination of the books of accoum earned out In accordance- wit) Generally Accepted Auditing Practices, we have npihtir Come across any instance nt baud on or by 1lie Company npr have we been Informed of any sum case by ihe Me n egemenl e xcegt tor fraud on thg Ccmpa ny through misapproprial ion of Current assets {net) aggregating to Rs. 16.5A Sacs by employees were noticed & reported which have been adjustedprovided for

For Ray * Ray Chartered Accounlants Firm Registration no. 301072 E

{A. K. SFibrma) Partner Membership No. OSOOB5

Place: Mew Delhi Date 27' August, 2014


Jun 30, 2013

Report on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Singer India Limited ("the Company”), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at June 30, 2013, and the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 (the ''Act''). This responsibility includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor''s Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Company''s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at June 30, 2013 and;

(b) in the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the profit for the year ended on that date; and

(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Emphasis of matter

We draw attention to Note 40 of the Financial Statements regarding remuneration paid/ provided in respect of non- executive chairman. The remuneration paid amounting to Rs. 774 (thousands) for the period 1st January, 2012 to 30th June, 2012 and Rs. 855 (thousands) for the period 1st July, 2012 to 31st December, 2012 was not approved by the Central Government on the technical ground that the tenure / period of proposed payment of remuneration was not specified in the resolution. The Company has made applications for reconsideration and review and is also in the process of regularising the appointment for the tenure. Further, the remuneration amounting to Rs. 742 (thousands) for the period 1st January, 2013 to 30th June, 2013 is subject to approval of Shareholders and Central Government. Our opinion is not qualified in respect of this matter.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 ("the Order”) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Act, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraph 4 and 5 of the Order.

2. As required by section 227(3) of the Act, we report that:

a. we have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;

b. in our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

c. the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account;

d. in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act,1956;

e. on the basis of written representations received from the directors as on June 30, 2013, and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on June 30, 2013, from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.

f. since the Central Government has not issued any notification as to the rate at which the cess is to be paid under section 441A of the Companies Act, 1956 nor has it issued any Rules under the said section, prescribing the manner in which such cess is to be paid, no cess is due and payable by the Company.

Annexure to the Independent Auditors'' Report

(Referred to in paragraph 1 under the heading Report on

Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements)

1. a) The Company has generally maintained proper records showing particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets lying at its Jammu factory and other locations.

b) The fixed assets were physically verified during the year by the management in accordance with a programme of verification which, in our opinion, provides for physical verification of major fixed assets at reasonable intervals having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. The discrepancies noticed on such verification which were not material have been properly dealt with in the books of account.

c) The fixed assets disposed off during the year, in our opinion, do not constitute a substantial part of the fixed assets of the Company and such disposal has, in our opinion, not affected the going concern status of the Company.

2. a) The inventory (excluding stocks with third parties and stock in transit) has been physically verified by the management during the year. Stock in transit as at 30th June, 2013 have been verified with reference to subsequent receipt of goods or other relevant documents. In respect of inventory lying with third parties, these have been confirmed by them. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is reasonable.

b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the Management were reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company is maintaining proper records of its inventories. The discrepancies noticed during the physical verification of inventories as compared to book records were not material and have been properly dealt with in books of account.

3. a) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured, to companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, the provisions of sub-clause (a), (b), (c) and (d) of paragraph 4 (iii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

b) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured, from companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, the provisions of sub-clause (e), (f) and (g) of paragraph

4 (iii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us and having regard to the explanation that for some items purchased for which comparable alternative quotations are not available because of the nature / quality of such items and delivery schedules and for sale of certain goods/services which are for the buyers specialized requirements for which suitable alternative sources are not available for comparable quotations, there are generally adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the company and nature of its business with regard to purchase of inventory, fixed assets and sale of goods and services except for accounts of Trade Payables which are under process of review/reconciliation. Subject to the above, during the course of our audit, we have neither come across nor have we been informed of any continuing failure to correct major weakness in internal control system.

5. a) On the basis of our examination of the books of account and according to the information and explanations given to us, we are of the opinion that the particulars of contracts or arrangements that need to be entered into the register maintained under Section 301 of the Act have been so entered.

b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the transaction made in pursuance of contracts or arrangements entered in the register maintained under section 301 of Companies Act, 1956 do not exceed the value of Rs.

5 lacs in respect of any party in any one financial year. Accordingly, the provisions of sub clause (b) of paragraph 4 (v) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

6. The directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and the provisions of sections 58A, 58AA and other relevant provisions of the Act and the rules framed there under, to the extent applicable, had been complied with by the Company. The Hon''ble High Court of Delhi vide Order dated 19.01.2011 in relation to the Appeal filed against the Order of the Hon''ble Company law Board dated 25th June, 2009 on the composite scheme for repayment of deposits under section 58A and 58AA of the Companies Act, 1956 directing the Company to pay interest to all depositors at the contracted rate up to the date of maturity and thereafter @ 5% till the date of final installment before 31st March, 2011. The Company has re-paid all unpaid interest on fixed deposits except 20 depositors whose principal and interest accrued thereon of Rs. 386 thousands is pending settlement due to non- submission of the original Fixed Deposit Receipts /indemnities.

7. On the basis of the internal audit & concurrent audit reports reviewed by us, we are of the opinion that, the coverage of internal and concurrent audit carried out by a firm of Chartered Accountants is commensurate with the size of the Company and nature of its business.

8. The Central Government has not prescribed maintenance of cost records under clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 209 of the Companies Act, 1956 for the products of the Company. Accordingly, the provisions of paragraph 4 (viii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

9. a) The Company is generally regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor education and protection fund, employees'' state insurance, income tax, value added tax/ sales tax, wealth tax, service tax, custom duty, excise duty, cess and other material statutory dues applicable to it.

Further, since the Central Government has till date not prescribed the amount of cess payable under Section 441A of the Companies Act, 1956, we are not in a position to comment upon the regularity or otherwise of the Company in depositing the same.

b) According to information and explanations given to us, there are no other undisputed amount payable in respect of provident fund, investor education & protection fund, income tax, employees state insurance, wealth tax, value added tax/ sales tax, custom duty, service tax, excise duty, cess and other statutory dues which were outstanding at the period end for period of more than six months from the date they become payable.

10. The Company has no accumulated losses as at 30th June, 2013 and it has not incurred any cash losses in the financial year ended on that date or in the immediately preceding financial year.

11. The Company did not have any outstanding dues to any financial institution & bank. The Company has not have any debenture holders.

12. The Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities. Accordingly, paragraph 4 (xii) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

13. In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi / mutual benefit fund / society. Accordingly, paragraph 4 (xiii) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

14. The Company is not dealing in or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the provisions of paragraph 4(xiv) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

15. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions. Accordingly, paragraph 4 (xv) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

16. The Company did not have any term loans outstanding during the year. Accordingly, the provisions of paragraph 4 (xvi) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

17. According to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the Company, we report that no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term investments.

18. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties and companies/ firms covered in the Register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, the provisions of clause (xviii) of paragraph 4 of the aforesaid order are not applicable to the Company.

19. The Company has not issued debentures during the year under audit. Accordingly, the provisions of clause (xix) of paragraph 4 of the aforesaid Order are not applicable to the Company.

20. The Company has not raised any money by public issues during the period. Accordingly, the provisions of paragraph 4(xx) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

21. During the course of our examination of the books of account carried out in accordance with Generally Accepted Auditing Practices, we have neither come across any instance of fraud on or by the Company nor have we been informed of any such case by the Management

For Ray & Ray

Chartered Accountants Firm Registration no. 301072 E

(A.K. Sharma)

Partner

Membership No. 80085

New Delhi, 27th August, 2013


Jun 30, 2012

1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Singer India Limited fthe Company") as at 30™ June, 2012. and the related Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto (collectively referred to as the "Financial Statements") which we have signed under reference to this report. These Financial Statements are the responsibility of the Company's Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these Financial Statements based on our audi).

2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Auditing Standards generally accepted In India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the Financial Statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the Financial Statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall Financial Statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

3. As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order 2003 ('the Ordef) as amended by Companies (Auditor's Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004 (together with "the Order*) issued by the Central Government in terms of sub- section (4A) of Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956 ('the Act") and on the basis of such checks of the books and records of the Company as we considered appropriate and according to the information and explanations given to us, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 & 5 of the said Order.

4. Without qualifying our opinion, we draw your attention to the Note no: 42 of Financial Statements stating that Managerial Remuneration (Retainership fee and other Bonafide reimbursement I benefits) amounting to Rs. 774 thousand) paid to non-executive Chairman is subject to approval of the Central Government. As represented to us by the management, the Company has applied to the Central Government for approval.

5. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 3 above, we report that:

(i) we have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of ouraudit;

(ii) in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from ourexamination of those books;

(iii) the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow. Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

(iv) in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section211 oftheCompaniesAct, 1956.

(v) on the basis of written representations received from the directors as on 30th June, 2012, and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we reportlhat none of the directors are disqualified as on 30th June, 2012 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause, (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;

(vi) in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said Financial Statements together with the notes thereon and attached thereto give in the prescribed manner, the information required by the Companies Act, 1956, and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India;

(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 30th June, 2012;

(b) in the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the Profit for the year ended on that date; and

(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the Cash Flows for the year ended on that date.

Annexure to the auditors' report of even date to the members of Singer India Limited on the Financial Statements fortheyearended 30* June, 2012

1. a) The Company has generally maintained proper records showing particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets lying at its Jammu factory and other locations.

b) The fixed assets were physically verified during the year by the management in accordance with a programme of verification which, in our opinion. provides for physical verification of major fixed assets at reasonable intervals having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. The discrepancies noticed on such verification which were not material have been properly dealt with In the books of account. The periodicity of physical verification of Jammu assets needs to be increased.

c) The fixed assets disposed off during the year, in our opinion, do not constitute a substantial part of the fixed assets of the Company and such disposal has, in our opinion, not affected the going concern status of the Company.

2. a) The inventory (excluding stocks with third parties and stock in transit) has been physically verified by the managefnent during the year. Stocks in transit as at 30th June, 2012 have been verified with reference to subsequent receipt of goods or other relevant documents. In respect of inventory lying with third parties, these have been confirmed by them. In our opinion, the frequency of verification Is reasonable.

b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the Management were reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

c). In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company is maintaining proper records of its inventories. The discrepancies noticed during the physical verification of inventories as compared to book records were not material and have been properly dealtwith in books of account.

3. a) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured, to companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, the provisions of sub-clause (a), (b). (c) and (d) of paragraph 4 (iii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

b) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured, from companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act. 1956. Accordingly, the provisions of sub-clause (e), (f) and (g) of paragraph 4 (iii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us and having regard to the explanation thatforsome items purchased for which comparable alternative quotations are not available because of the nature / quality of such items and delivery schedules and for sale of certain goods/services which are for the buyers specialized requirements for which suitable alternative sources are not available for comparable quotations, there are generally adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the company and nature of its business with regard to purchase of inventory, fixed assets and sale of goods and services except for accounts of creditors which are under process of review/reconciliation. Subject to the above, during the course of our audit, we have neither come across nor have we been informed of any continuing failure to correct major weakness in internal control system.

5. a) On the basis of our examination of the books of account and according to the information and explanations given to us, we are of the opinion that ¦ the particulars of contracts or arrangements that need to be entered into the register maintained underSection 301 of the Act have been so entered.

b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the transaction made in pursuance of contracts or arrangements entered in the register maintained under section 301 of Companies Act, 1956 do not exceed the value of Rs. 5 lacs in respect of any party in any one financial year. Accordingly, the provisions of sub clause (b) of paragraph 4 (v) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

6. The directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and the provisions of sections 58A, SSAAand other relevant provisions of the Act and the rules framed there under, to the extent applicable, had been complied with by the Company. The Hon'ble High Court of Delhi vide Order dated 19.01.2011 in relation to the Appeal Filed against the Order of the Hon'ble Company law Board dated 25th June, 2009 on the composite scheme for repayment of deposits under section S8A and 58AA of the Companies Act, 1956 directing the Company to pay interest to all depositors al the contracted rate up to the date of maturity and thereafter @ 5% till the date of final installment before 31st March, 2011. The Company has re-paid all unpaid interest on fixed deposits except 21 depositors whose principal and interesl accrued Ihereon of Rs. 437 thousand is pending settlement due to non-submission of the original Fixed Deposit Receipts /indemnities.

7. On the basis of the internal audit & concurrent audit reports broadly reviewed by us. we are of the opinion that, the coverage of internal and concurrent audit earned out by a firm of Chartered Accountants is commensurate with the size of the Company and nature of Its business.

8. The Central Government has not prescribed maintenance of cost records under clause (d) of sub- section (1)of section 209 of the Companies Act, 1956 for the products of the Company. Accordingly, the provisions of paragraph 4 (viii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

9. a) The Company is generally regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor education and nrotection fund emnlovees' slate insurance income tax, value added tax/ sales tax, wealth tax, service tax,'custom duty, excise duty, cess and othermaterial statutory dues applicable to it.

Further, since the Central Government has till date not prescribed the amount of cess payable under Section 441 Aof the Companies Act, 1956, we are not in a position to comment upon the regularity or otherwise of the Company in depositing the same.

b) According to information and explanations given to us, there are no other undisputed amount payable in respect of provident fund, investor education- & protection fund, income tax, employees state insurance, wealth tax, value added tax / sales tax, custom duly, service tax, excise duty, cess and other statutorydues which were outstanding at the period end for period of more than six months from the date they become payable.

c) According to the information and explanations given to us, there are no dues of wealth tax, service tax, custom duty and cess which have not been deposited on account of any dispute other than disputed income tax, value added tax/sales tax and excise duty as indicated below:

Name of Nature Year Statute of Dues

Value Added Sales Tax 2008-09 Tax of various Stales

Sales Tax 2005-05

Sales Tax 1992-93,2002-03, 2007-08

Sales Tax 1995-96

Sales Tax 1892-93, 1996-97, 2004-05

Sales Tax 1992-93, 1996-97, 2004-05

Total

Income Tax Act Income Tax 2003-04

Total

Central Excise Act Excise Duty 2005-06

Total

Name of Forum before which Amount Statute dispute pending (Rs. in'000)

Value Added Tax of Various States First Appellate Authority, 1632 Delhi

First Appellate Authority, Delhi 182

First Appellate Authority, West Bengal 995

Appellate Tribunal, West Bengal 1,479

First Appellate Authority, Maharashtra 3,962

First Appellate Authority, Goa 13

Total 8,263

Income Tax Act ITAT. Mumbai 3,000

Total 3,000

Central Excise Act Appellate Authority, Delhi 6,038

Total 6,038

10. The Company has no accumulated losses as at 30th June, 2012 and it has nol incurred any cash losses in the financial year ended on that date or in the immediately preceding financial year.

11. The Company did not have any outstanding dues to any financial institution & bank. The Company does not have any debenture holders.

12. The Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security byway of pledge of shares, debentures and olfiersecurities. Accordingly, paragraph 4{xii) of the Orderis not applicable to the Company.

13. In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi / mutual benefit fund / society. Accordingly, paragraph 4 (xiii) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

14. The Company is not dealing in or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the provisions of paragraph 4(xiv)of the Orderare not applicable to the Company.

15. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions. Accordingly, paragraph 4 (xv) of Wie Order is not applicable to the Company.

16. The Company did not have any term loans outstanding during the year. Accordingly, the provisions of paragraph 4 (xvi) of the Orderare nolapplicabletothe Company.

17. According to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the Company, we report that no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term investments.

18. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties and companies/ firms covered in the Register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, the provisions of clause (xviii) of paragraph 4 of the aforesaid order are not applicable to the Company.

19. The Company has not issued debentures during thB year under audit. Accordingly, the provisions of clause (xix) of paragraph 4 of the aforesaid Order are not applicable to the Company.

20. The Company has not raised any money by public issues during the period. Accordingly, the provisions of paragraph 4(xx) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

21. During the course of our examination of the books of account carried out in accordance with Generally Accepted Auditing Practices, we have neither come across any instance of fraud on or by the Company nor have we been informed of any such case by the Management. For Ray & Ray

Chartered Accountants

Firm Registration no. 301072 E

(A.K. Sharma)

New Delhi, 22nd August, 2012 Partner

Membership No. 80085


Jun 30, 2010

1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Singer India Limited (the Company) as at 30th June, 2010, the Profit and Loss Account and the Cash Flow Statement for the period ended 30th June, 2010 annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order 2003 (the Order) as amended by Companies (Auditors Report) (Amendment) issued by the Central Government in terms of sub - section (4A) of Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956 (the Act) and on the basis of such checks as we considered appropriate and according to the information and explanations given to us, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 & 5 of the said Order.

4. Attention is invited to the following notes in Schedule 21:

(i) Note 3.2 as regards balances of creditors are under the process of review / confirmation / reconciliation.

(ii) Notes 10.2 as regards non reversal of adjustment entry passed in earlier years with respect to write back of 90% of liability of unsecured creditors aggregating to Rs. 228,762 thousand in view of setting aside of para 11.8 (a) to (c) of the Honble BIFR Order by the Honble AAIFR vide its order dated 28th May, 2010.

(iii) Note 11 as regards the accumulated losses have exceeded the paid up share capital and the networth of the Company is completely eroded. These factors along with other matters as set forth in the financial statement, raise doubt that the Company will be able to continue as going concern. Further such Financial Statements do not include any adjustment relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets amounts or to amounts and classification of liabilities that may be necessary in case the Company is unable to continue as going concern.

(iv) Note 16 as regards managerial remuneration of Rs. 1,184 thousand which is subject to Central Government & Shareholders approval.

The consequential effect of the adjustments, if carried out of the amounts to the extent ascertainable would have resulted in the profit after tax turning into a loss of Rs. 204231 Thousand for the period ended 30th June, 2010 and increase in liabilities and accumulated losses by Rs. 228,762 thousand. As regards our comments in other points in para 4 above, the effect is not quantifiable at this stage.

5. Subject to our remarks in paragraphs 3 & 4 above:

(i) we have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

(ii) in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

(iii) the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

(iv) in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956. However, reference is drawn to Notes 10.2 and 12 in Schedule 21.

(v) on the basis of written representations received from the directors as on 30th June, 2010, and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the directors are disqualified as on 30th June, 2010 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;

(vi) in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said accounts read in conjunction with Schedules 1 to 21 and subject to the matter specified in para 4 above, give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India;

(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 30th June, 2010;

(b) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the Profit (before reversal of write back of liabilities in earlier years) for the period ended on that date; and

(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement of the Cash Flows for the period ended on that date.

Annexure to the auditors report of even date to the members of Singer India Limited on the financial statements for the period ended 30th June, 2010

1. a) The Company has generally maintained proper records showing particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets lying at its Jammu factory and other locations.

b) Some of the fixed assets (except at Jammu Location) were physically verified during the year by the Management in accordance with a programme of verification which, in our opinion, provides for physical verification of major fixed assets at reasonable intervals having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. According to the information and explanation given to us, no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification. The periodicity of physical verification of Jammu assets needs to be increased.

c) Fixed assets disposed off during the period were not substantial and do not affect the going concern assumption.

2. In respect of its inventories:

a) The inventory except goods in transit has been physically verified by the management during the period by the Management at reasonable intervals.

b) The procedures as explained to us, which were followed by the management for physical verification of inventory are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of its inventories and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.

3. a) The Company has not granted any loans, secured or

unsecured, to companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Therefore, the provisions of sub-clause (a), (b), (c) and (d) of clause 4 (iii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

b) The Company has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured, from companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Therefore, the provisions of sub-clause (e), (f) and (g) of clause 4 (iii) of the Order are not applicable to the Copany.

4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us and having regard to the explanation that for some items purchased / repurchased for which comparable alternative quotations are not available because of the nature / quality of such items and delivery schedules and for sale of certain goods/services which are for the buyers specialized requirements for which suitable alternative sources are not available for comparable quotations, there are generally adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the company and nature of its business with regard to purchase of inventory, fixed assets and sale of goods and services except for accounts of creditors are under process of review/reconciliation. Subject to the above, during the course of our audit, we have neither come across nor have we been informed of any continuing failure to correct major weakness in internal control system.

5. According to the information & explanations given to us, the Company has not entered into contracts or arrangements referred to in section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(v) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

6. The directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and the provisions of sections 58A, 58AA and other relevant provisions of the Act and the rules framed there under, to the extent applicable, had been complied with by the Company except default in repayment of principal & interest to fixed deposit holders and non compliance of clause (a) & (b) of sub section (2) of Section 58AA of the Companies Act, 1956. The Company has received an Order of Company Law Board dated 11 April 2007 rescheduling the repayment of deposits. The Company has also made application seeking condonation of defaults. The Company routes its entries pertaining to Fixed Deposit holders through Fixed Deposit Ledger Account. The Company has made an application for review and extension of the composite scheme of repayment of deposits under Section 58A & 58AA of the Companies Act, 1956 for which orders are still awaited.

7. On the basis of the internal audit reports broadly reviewed by us, we are of the opinion that, the coverage of internal and concurrent audit carried out by a firm of Chartered Accountants is commensurate with the size of the Company and nature of its business.

8. The Central Government has not prescribed maintenance of cost records under clause (d) of sub- section (1) of section 209 of the Companies Act, 1956 for the products of the Company. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4 (viii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

9. a) Undisputed Statutory dues including provident fund,

investor education and protection fund, employees state insurance, income-tax, sales tax, wealth-tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty and cess have generally been regularly deposited with the appropriate authorities though there has been a slight delay in a few cases.

Further, since the Central Government has till date not prescribed the amount of cess payable under section 441A of the Companies Act, 1956, we are not in a position to comment upon the regularity or otherwise of the Company in depositing the same.

b) According to information and explanations given to

us, there are no other undisputed amount payable in respect of provident fund, investor education & protection fund, income tax, employees state insurance, wealth tax, sales tax, custom duty, service tax, excise duty, cess and other statutory dues which were outstanding at the period end for period of more than six months from the date they become payable.

c) According to the information and explanations given to us the Company did not have any disputed dues on account of customs duty, wealth tax, service tax and cess. The dues outstanding in respect of sales- tax, entry tax, excise duty and income-tax on





Amount Period Name of Nature of FORUM BEFORE WHICH

in Rs. the statute the dues DISPUTE PENDING

(000)

Sales Tax Act Sales Tax 182 2005-06 First Appellate Authority, Delhi

Sales Tax Act Sales Tax 319 2003-04 First Appellate Authority, U.P

Sales Tax Act Sales Tax 995 1992-93 & 2002-03 First Appellate Authority, West Bengal

Sales Tax Act Sales Tax 3962 1992-93, 1996-97 & First Appellate Authority, Maharashtra

2004-05

Sales Tax Act Sales Tax 7430 2000-01 to 2004-05 Sales Tax Tribunal, Karnataka

Sales Tax Act Sales Tax 13 2002-03 First Appellate Authority , Goa

Sales Tax Act Sales Tax 142 2002-03 First Appellate Authority, Madhya Pradesh

Income Tax Act, 1961 Income Tax 9500 2003-04 ITAT, Mumbai

Excise Duty Excise Duty 8576 2005-06 Appellate Authority, Delhi



11. The Company did not have any outstanding dues to any financial institutions & banks. The Company has not issued any debentures.

12. The Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities. Accordingly, clause 4 (xii) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

13. In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi / mutual benefit fund / society. Accordingly, clause 4 (xiii) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

14. The Company is not dealing in or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

15. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions. Accordingly, clause 4 (xv) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

16. The Company did not have any term loans outstanding during the period. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4 (xvi) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

17. Based on an overall examination of the balance sheet and cash flow statement of the Company, we report that no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long- term investment except for permanent working capital.

18. The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties or companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Act. However, preferential allotment of 5,327,900 Equity Shares were made to Singer (India) BV. Netherlands – the Holding Company at Rs. 10 each as per the Scheme of Rehabilitation approved by BIFR.

19. The Company did not have any outstanding debentures during the period. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xix) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

20. The Company has not raised any money by public issues during the period. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xx) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

21. According to the information and explanations furnished by the management which have been relied upon by us, there were no frauds on or by the Company which has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.



For Ray & Ray

Chartered Accountants

(A.K. Sharma)

Partner

Place : New Delhi Membership No. 80085

Date : 29th Sept. 2010 Firm Registration No. 301072 E

Disclaimer: This is 3rd Party content/feed, viewers are requested to use their discretion and conduct proper diligence before investing, GoodReturns does not take any liability on the genuineness and correctness of the information in this article

Get Instant News Updates
Enable
x
Notification Settings X
Time Settings
Done
Clear Notification X
Do you want to clear all the notifications from your inbox?
Settings X