Home  »  Company  »  Sintex Industrie  »  Quotes  »  Auditor Report
Enter the first few characters of Company and click 'Go'

Auditor Report of Sintex Industries Ltd.

Mar 31, 2016

We have audited the accompanying Standalone Financial Statements of SINTEX INDUSTRIES LIMITED ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 31st March, 2016, the Statement of profit and Loss and the Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

The Company''s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act") with respect to the preparation of these standalone financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of the appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor''s Responsibility

our responsibility is to express an opinion on these standalone financial statements based on our audit.

We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the Accounting and Auditing Standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made thereunder.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant to the Company''s preparation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Company''s Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the standalone financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the standalone financial statements.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid standalone financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31st March, 2016, and its profit and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by Section 143(3) of the Act, we report that:

a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit.

b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books.

c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account.

d) In our opinion, the aforesaid standalone financial statements comply with the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014.

e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors as on 31st March, 2016 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March, 2016, from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164(2) of the Act.

f) With respect to the adequacy of the Internal Financial Controls over financial reporting of the Company and the operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to our Separate Report in "Annexure A". Our report expresses an unmodified opinion on the adequacy and operating effectiveness of the Company''s internal financial controls over financial reporting.

g) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor''s Report in accordance with Rules 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i) The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position in its financial statement.

ii) The Company did not have any long term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses.

iii) There has been no delay in transferring amounts, required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.

2. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2016 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government in terms of Section 143(11) of the Act, we give in "Annexure B" a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.

"ANNEXURE B" TO THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR''S REPORT

(Referred to in Paragraph 2 under "Report on other legal and regulatory requirements" of our report of even date)

1. In respect of its fixed assets:

a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets on the basis of available information.

b) As explained to us, all the fixed assets have been physically verified by the management in a phased periodical manner, which in our opinion is reasonable, having regard to the size of the Company and nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such physical verification.

c) According to the information and explanations given to us and the title deeds / lease deeds and other records examined by us, we report that the title deeds / lease deeds in respect of all the immovable properties of land which are freehold, immovable properties of land that have been taken on lease and disclosed as fixed assets in the financial statement and buildings are held in the Company''s name.

2. As explained to us, physical verification of the inventories except stocks lying with third parties, have been conducted at reasonable intervals by the management, which in our opinion is reasonable, having regard to the size of the Company and nature of its inventories. For stocks lying with third parties at the year end, written confirmations have been obtained. The discrepancies noticed on verification between the physical stocks and the book records were not material and have been dealt with in books of accounts.

3. The Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to companies, firms, limited liability partnerships or other parties covered in the register maintained under Section 189 of the Act. Consequently, the requirement of clause (iii) (a) to clause (iii) (c) of paragraph 3 of the order is not applicable to the Company.

4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has complied with provisions of Section 185 and 186 of the Act in respect of loans, investments, guarantees and security.

5. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not accepted any deposit nor has any unclaimed deposit within the meaning of the provisions of Sections 73 to 76 or any other relevant provision of the Act and the rules framed thereunder. Therefore, the provisions of Clause (v) of paragraph 3 of the order are not applicable to the Company.

6. We have broadly reviewed the cost records maintained by the Company pursuant to the Companies (Cost Records and Audit) Rules, 2014 prescribed by the Central Government under Sub- section (1) of Section 148 of the Act applicable in respect of activities undertaken by the Company and are of the opinion that prima facie the prescribed cost records have been maintained. We have, however, not made a detailed examination of the cost records with a view to determine whether they are accurate or complete.

7. In respect of statutory dues:

a) According to the records of the Company, undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, employees'' state insurance, income tax, sales tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value added tax, cess and any other statutory dues have been regularly deposited with appropriate authorities. According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of the aforesaid dues, were outstanding as at March 31, 2016 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

b) According to the information and explanations given to us, there are no dues of income tax, sales tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value added tax, cess on account of any dispute, which have not been deposited, except in case of Sales Tax/Value Added Tax, the details of which is as under:

Name of the Statue Nature of Dues Forum where Dispute is pending

Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003 Value Added Tax CTO Circle C, Jaipur Rajasthan

Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 Central Sales Tax CTO Circle C, Jaipur Rajasthan

Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 Central Sales Tax Additional Commissioner, Commercial Taxes,West Bengal

Maharashtra Value Added Tax Value Added Tax Joint Commissioner, Nagpur

Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 Central Sales Tax Joint Commissioner, Nagpur

Name of the Statute Period to which Amount amount relates (Rs. in crores)

Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003 2007-08 0.10

Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 2007-08 0.04

Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 2011-12 0.18

Maharashtra Value Added Tax 2011-12 0.97

Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 2011-12 0.06

8. Based on our audit procedures and on the basis of information and explanations given to us by the management, we are of the opinion that the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to the financial institution, bank and debenture holders.

9. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the term loans have been applied, on an overall basis, for the purposes for which they were obtained other than temporary deployment pending application. The Company has not raised money by way of initial public offer or further public offer (including debt instruments) during the year under review.

10. Based upon the audit procedures performed and as per the information and explanations given to us, we report that, no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the year.

11. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, managerial remuneration has been paid or provided in accordance with the requisite approvals mandated by the provisions of the Section 197 read with Schedule V to the Act.

12. In our opinion, Company is not a Nidhi company. Therefore, the provisions of clause (xii) of paragraph 3 of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

13. According to the information and explanations given to us, all the transactions with the related parties are in compliance with Section 177 and 188 of the Act, where applicable, and the details have been disclosed in the standalone financial statements as required by the applicable accounting standards.

14. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not made any preferential allotment or private placement of shares or fully or partly convertible debentures during the year and hence clause (xiv) of paragraph 3 of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

15. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not entered into any non-cash transaction with the directors or persons connected with them and covered under Section 192 of the Act. Hence, clause (xv) of paragraph 3 of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

16. To the best of our knowledge and as explained, the Company is not required to be registered under Section 45- IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934. Accordingly, paragraph 3(xvi) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

For SHAH & SHAH ASSOCIATES

Chartered Accountants

Firm Regn. No. 113742W

VASANT C. TANNA

Place : Ahmedabad Partner

Date : 7th June, 2016 Membership Number: 100422


Mar 31, 2015

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of SINTEX INDUSTRIES LIMITED ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 31st March, 2015, the Statement of Profit and Loss, the Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

The Company''s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act") with respect to the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding of the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditors'' Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made thereunder.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant to the Company''s preparation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Company''s Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the financial statements.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid Financial Statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31March 2015, and its profit and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Emphasis of Matter

We draw attention to Note 29.3 to these financial statements, regarding the Scheme of Arrangement (the "Scheme") approved by the Honorable High Court of Gujarat on 25th March,2009. As per the Scheme, the Company earmarked Rs.200 crore from Securities Premium Account to International Business Development Reserve Account (the "IBDR") and adjusted against IBDR the expenses of the nature specified under the scheme amounting to Rs.200.00 crore up to 31st March, 2015 (Rs.198.11 Crore up to 31st March,2014). The said accounting treatment has been followed as prescribed under the Scheme. The relevant accounting principles generally accepted in India, in absence of such Scheme, does not permit the adjustment of such expenses against the Securities Premium Account / IBDR. Had the Company accounted for these expenses as per Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in India, the balance of Securities Premium Account / IBDR would have been higher by Rs.200.00 crore as at 31st March, 2015(''198.11 Crore as at 31st March,2014) and profit after tax would have been lower by Rs.1.89 crore for the year ended on 31st March, 2015 (Rs.0.80 Crore for the year ended on 31st March,2014) and the surplus in Statement of profit and loss would have been lower by Rs.200.00 Crores.

Our opinion is not qualified in respect of this matter.

Other Matter

The financial statements of the Company for the year ended 31st March, 2014 were audited by another auditor whose report dated 8th May, 2014 expressed an unmodified opinion on those statements.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2015 issued by the Central Government of India in terms of Sub-section (11) of Section 143 of the Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Order"), and on the basis of such checks of the books and records of the Company as we considered appropriate and according to the information and explanations given to us, we give in the Annexure a Statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order

2. As required by Section 143 (3) of the Act, we report that:

(a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit.

(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books.

(c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account.

(d) In our opinion, the aforesaid financial statements comply with the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014.

(e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on 31st March, 2015 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March, 2015 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164 (2) of the Act.

(f) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor''s Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies Act (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2015, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us,

i) The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position in its Financial Statements.

ii) The Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses.

iii) There has been no delay in transferring amounts required to be transferred to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.

Annexure to the Independent Auditors'' Report

Annexure referred to in paragraph 1 of the Auditors'' Report on accounts for the year ended 31st March, 2015

1. a) The Company is maintaining proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

b) As explained to us, the fixed assets are physically verified by the Management according to a phased programme designed to cover all the items over a period two years which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. Pursuant to the programme, a portion of the fixed assets has been physically verified by the Management during the year and no material discrepancies have been noticed on such verification.

2. a) Physical verification of inventories has been conducted by the management at reasonable intervals during the year,

b) In our opinion, the procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

C) In our opinion, the Company is maintaining proper records of Inventories. The discrepancies noticed on such verification between the physical stocks and book records were not material and the same have been properly dealt with in the books of account.

3. As informed to us the Company has not granted loans, secured or unsecured, to companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013.

4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there is generally an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business, for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services; however the same are required to be further improved & strengthened. According to the information and explanations given to us, we have not observed any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in internal control system.

5. According to the information and explanations given to us the Company has not accepted any deposits, in terms of the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and the provisions of sections 73 to 76 or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act,2013 and the rules framed there under.

6. In respect of business activities of the Company, maintenance of cost records has been specified by the Central Government under sub-section (I) of section 148 of the Companies Act. We have broadly reviewed the cost records maintained by the Company and are of the opinion that prima facie, the prescribed accounts and cost records have been maintained. We have, however, not made a detailed examination of the records with a view to determining whether they are accurate or complete.

7. a) As per information and explanations given to us, the

Company is regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, employees'' state insurance, income tax, sales-tax, wealth tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value added tax, cess and any other statutory dues with the appropriate authorities. There are no outstanding statutory dues as at the last day of the financial year under audit for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

b) According to the information and explanation given to us, there are no dues of sales tax, income tax, custom duty, wealth tax, service tax, excise duty and cess which have not been deposited on account of any dispute, except in case of Sales Tax/Value Added Tax, the details of which is as under:

Name of the Name of Forum Financial Amount Statute Dues where your to (Rs. ub /cr) dispute which is amount pending relates

Rajasthan Value Added CTO Circle 2007-08 and 1.45 Value Added Tax C, Jaipur 2008-09 Tax Act, Rajasthan 2003

Central Central Sales CTO Circle 2007-08 and 0.44 Sales Tax Tax C, Jaipur 2008-09 Act,1956 Rajasthan

c) The amount required to be transferred to Investor Education and Protection Fund has been transferred within the stipulated time in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the rules made thereunder.

8. There are no accumulated losses of the Company as at the end of the year. The Company has not incurred cash losses during the financial year covered by our audit and in the immediately preceding financial year.

9. Based on our audit procedures and on the basis of information and explanations given to us by the management, we are of the opinion that the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to the financial institution, bank and debenture holders.

10. According to information and explanations given to us, the terms and conditions of the guarantee given by the Company for loan taken by wholly owned subsidiary from a Bank are not, prima facie, prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

11.In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the term loans have been applied, on an overall basis, for the purposes for which they were obtained other than temporary deployment pending application.

12. Based upon the audit procedures performed and information and explanations given by the management, we report that, no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the year.

For SHAH & SHAH ASSOCIATES Chartered Accountants FRN: 1 1 3742W

VASANT C. TANNA Place: Ahmedabad Partner Date: May 7, 2015 Membership Number: 100422


Mar 31, 2014

Report on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of SINTEX INDUSTRIES LIMITED ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 31st March, 2014, the Statement of Profit and Loss and the Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

The Company''s Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the Accounting Standards notified under the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act") (which continue to be applicable in respect of Section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013 in terms of General Circular 15/2013 dated 13th September, 2013 of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs) and in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India. This responsibility includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditors'' Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Company''s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company''s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31st March, 2014;

(b) in the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the Profit of the Company for the year ended on that date; and

(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows of the Company for the year ended on that date.

Emphasis of Matter

We draw attention to Note 29.3 to the financial statements, regarding the Scheme of Arrangement ("the Scheme") approved by the Honourable High Court of Gujarat on 25th March, 2009. As per the Scheme, the Company earmarked Rs.200 crore from Securities Premium Account to International Business Development Reserve Account ("IBDR") in the year 2008-09 and adjusted against IBDR the expenses of the nature specified under the Scheme amounting to Rs.198.11 crore up to 31st March, 2014 (Rs.197.31 crore up to 31st March, 2013). The said accounting treatment has been followed as prescribed under the Scheme. The relevant Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in India, in absence of such Scheme, does not permit the adjustment of such expenses against the Securities Premium Account / IBDR. Had the Company accounted for these expenses as per Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in India, the balance of Securities Premium Account would have been higher by Rs.198.11 crore as at 31st March, 2014 (Rs.197.31 crore as at 31st March, 2013) and Profit after tax would have been lower by Rs.0.80 crore for the year ended on 31st March, 2014 (Rs.5.16 crore for the previous year ended on 31st March, 2013) and the surplus in Statement of Profit and Loss would have been lower by Rs.198.11 crores.

Our opinion is not qualified in respect of this matter.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government in terms of Section 227(4A) of the Act, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.

2. As required by Section 227(3) of the Act, we report that: (a) We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit.

(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books.

(c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account.

(d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards notified under the Act (which continue to be applicable in respect of Section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013 in terms of General Circular 15/2013 dated 13th September, 2013 of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs), other than for the matter referred to in Emphasis of Matter paragraph.

(e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on 31st March, 2014 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March, 2014 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 274(1)(g) of the Act.

(i) In respect of its fixed assets:

(a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) The fixed assets at some locations were physically verified during the year by the Management in accordance with a programme of verification which, in our opinion, provides for physical verification of all the fixed assets at reasonable intervals. According to the information and explanations given to us, no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

(c) The fixed assets disposed off during the year, in our opinion, do not constitute a substantial part of the fixed assets of the Company and such disposal has, in our opinion, not affected the going concern status of the Company.

(ii) In respect of its inventories:

(a) As explained to us, the inventories were physically verified during the year by the Management at reasonable intervals.

(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the Management were reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

(c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of its inventories and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.

(iii) The Company has neither granted nor taken any loans, secured or unsecured, to/from companies, firms or other parties covered in the Register maintained under Section 301 of the Act.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanation given to us, there is generally an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard to purchases of inventory and for the sale of goods and services and during the course of our audit we have not observed any major weaknesses in such internal control system. In view of the size of the company and the nature of its business, the company needs to further strengthen the procurement process of fixed assets.

(v) In respect of contracts or arrangements entered in the Register maintained in pursuance of Section 301 of the Act, to the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information and explanations given to us:

(a) The particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to in Section 301 that needed to be entered in the Register maintained under the said Section have been so entered.

(b) Where each of such transaction is in excess of Rs.5 lakhs in respect of any party, the transactions have been made at prices which are prima facie reasonable having regard to the prevailing market prices at the relevant time.

(vi) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not accepted deposits from the public to which the directives issued by the Reserve bank of India and the provisions of Section 58A and 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the Act and the rules framed there under would apply. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(vi) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

(vii) In our opinion, the internal audit functions carried out during the year by a firm of Chartered Accountants appointed by the management needs to be further strengthened to make it commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

(viii) We have broadly reviewed the cost records maintained by the Company pursuant to the Companies (Cost Accounting Records) Rules, 2011 prescribed by the Central Government under Section 209(1) (d) of the Act and are of the opinion that, prima facie, the prescribed cost records have been maintained. We have, however, not made a detailed examination of the cost records with a view to determine whether they are accurate or complete.

(ix) According to the information and explanations given to us, in respect of statutory dues:

(a) The Company has generally been regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues, including Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Income-tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues applicable to it with the appropriate authorities.

(b) There were no undisputed amounts payable in respect of Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Income-tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues in arrears as at 31st March, 2014 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(c) There were no dues pending to be deposited on account of any dispute in respect of Income-tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty and Cess as on 31st March, 2014. Details of dues of Sales Tax/ Value Added Tax which have not been deposited as on 31st March, 2014 on account of disputes are given below:

Name of the statue Nature of Dues Forum Where Dispute is pending Period to Which the amount relates Amount Invol -ved (Rs. in Crores) Central Sales Tax Central Additional Commissioner Commercial 2010-11 0.14 Act,1956 Sales Tax Taxes, Corporate Division,Uluberia, West Bengal

West Bengal Value Value Added Additional Commissioner Commercial 2010-11 0.49 Added Tax Act Tax Taxes, Corporate Division Uluberia, West Bengal

Central Sales Tax Central CTO Circle C, Jaipur, Rajasthan 2007-08 and 0.43 Act,1956 Sales Tax 2008-09

Rajasthan Value Value Added CTO Circle C, Jaipur, Rajasthan 2007-08 and 1.67 Added Tax Act, 2003 Tax 2008-09

(x) The Company does not have any accumulated losses at the end of the financial year and the Company has not incurred cash losses during the financial year covered by our audit and in the immediately preceding financial year.

(xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not defaulted in the repayment of dues to financial institutions, banks and debenture holders.

(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

(xiii) The Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/mutual benefit fund/society. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4 (xiii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

(xiv) The Company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

(xv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the terms and conditions of the guarantees given by the Company for loans taken by wholly owned subsidiary from a financial institution are not, prima facie, prejudicial to the interests of the Company.

(xvi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the term loans have been applied by the Company during the year for the purposes for which they were obtained, other than temporary deployment pending application.

(xvii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the Company, we report that funds raised on short-term basis have, prima facie, not been used during the year for long- term investment.

(xviii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to companies covered in the Register maintained under section 301 of the Act. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xviii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

(xix) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not issued any debentures during the year. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xix) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

(xx) The Company has not raised any money by public issues during the financial year. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xx) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

(xxi) To the best of our knowledge and according to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud by the Company and no material fraud on the Company has been noticed or reported during the year.

For DELOITTE HASKINS & SELLS

Chartered Accountants

(Registration No.117365W)

Samir R Shah

May 8, 2014 Partner

AHMEDABAD, (Membership No.101708)


Mar 31, 2013

Report on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of SINTEX INDUSTRIES LIMITED ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 31st March , 2013, the Statement of Profit and Loss and the Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

The Company''s Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the Accounting Standards referred to in Section 211(3C) of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act") and in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India. This responsibility includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditors'' Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Company''s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company''s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31, 2013;

(b) in the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the profit of the Company for the year ended on that date; and

(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows of the Company for the year ended on that date.

Emphasis of Matter

We draw attention to Note 29.4 to these financial statements, regarding the Scheme of Arrangement (the "Scheme") approved by the Honourable High Court of Gujarat, as per which Scheme, in the year 2008-09 the Company earmarked Rs.200 crore from Securities Premium Account to International Business Development Reserve Account (the "IBDR") and adjusted against the earmarked balance of IBDR, 197.31 crore upto March 31, 2013 (192.15 crore upto March 31, 2012) being expenses of the nature as specified under the Scheme. The said accounting treatment has been followed as prescribed under the Scheme. The relevant Indian Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, in absence of such Scheme, would not permit the adjustment of such expenses against the Securities Premium Account / IBDR. Had the Company accounted for these expenses as per Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in India, instead of accounting for as per the Scheme, the balance of Securities Premium Account would have been higher by 197.31 crore as at March 31, 2013 (192.15 crore as at March 31, 2012) and profit after tax would have been lower by Rs.5.16 crore for the year ended on March 31, 2013 (Rs.4.42 crore for the previous year ended on March 31, 2012) and the surplus in Statement of Profit and Loss would have been lower by 197.31 crores.

Our opinion is not qualified in respect of this matter.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government in terms of Section 227(4A) of the Act, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.

2. As required by Section 227(3) of the Act, we report that:

(a) We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit.

(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books.

(c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account.

(d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards referred to in Section 211(3C) of the Act, other than for the matter referred to in Emphasis of Matter paragraph.

(e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on March 31, 2013 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2013 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 274(1)(g) of the Act.

(i) Having regard to the nature of the Company''s business/activities/result during the year, clauses (x), (xiii) and (xiv) of CARO are not applicable to the Company.

(ii) In respect of its fixed assets:

(a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) The fixed assets were physically verified during the year by the Management in accordance with a regular programme of verification which, in our opinion, provides for physical verification of all the fixed assets at reasonable intervals. According to the information and explanations given to us, no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

(c) The fixed assets disposed off during the year, in our opinion, do not constitute a substantial part of the fixed assets of the Company and such disposal has, in our opinion, not affected the going concern status of the Company.

(iii) In respect of its inventory:

(a) As explained to us, the inventories were physically verified during the year by the Management at reasonable intervals.

(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the Management were reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

(c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of its inventories and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.

(iv) The Company has neither granted nor taken any loans, secured or unsecured, to/from companies, firms or other parties covered in the Register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(v) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, having regard to the explanations that some of the items purchased are of special nature and suitable alternative sources are not readily available for obtaining comparable quotations, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard to purchases of inventory and fixed assets and the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any major weakness in such internal control system.

(vi) According to the information and explanations given to us, there were no contracts or arrangement referred to in Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 which were required to be entered in the register maintained under that section.

(vii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not accepted any deposit from the public during the year. In respect of unclaimed deposits, the Company has complied with the provisions of Sections 58A, 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956.

(viii) In our opinion, the internal audit functions carried out during the year by a firm of Chartered Accountants appointed by the Management have been commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

(ix) We have broadly reviewed the cost records maintained by the Company, pursuant to the Companies [Cost Accounting Records) Rules, 2011 prescribed by the Central Government under Section 209(1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 and are of the opinion that, prima facie, the prescribed cost records have been maintained. We have, however, not made a detailed examination of the cost records with a view to determine whether they are accurate or complete.

(x) According to the information and explanations given to us, in respect of statutory dues:

(a) The Company has generally been regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues, including Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Income-tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues applicable to it with the appropriate authorities.

(b) There were no undisputed amounts payable in respect of Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees'' State Insurance , Income-tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues in arrears as at March 31, 2013 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(c) Details of dues of Sales Tax which have not been deposited as on March 31, 2013 on account of disputes are given below:

Statute Nature of Dues Forum where Dispute Period to which the Amount involved is pending amount relates (Rs. in crores)

Central Sales Tax Central Sales Tax Additional Commissioner Commercial 2009-10 0.52 Act, 1956 Taxes, Uluberia, West Bengal

Central Sales Central Sales Tax CTO Circle C, Jaipur, Rajasthan 2007-08 and 0.43 Tax Act,1956 2008-09

Rajasthan Value Value Added Tax CTO Circle C, Jaipur, Rajasthan 2007-08 and 1.67 Added Tax Act, 2003 2008-09

(xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not defaulted in the repayment of dues to financial institutions, banks and debenture holders.

(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

(xiii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the terms and conditions of the guarantees given by the Company for loans taken by others from banks and financial institutions are not, prima facie, prejudicial to the interests of the Company.

(xiv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the term loans have been applied by the Company during the year for the purposes for which they were obtained, other than temporary deployment pending application.

(xv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the Company, we report that funds raised on short-term basis have, prima facie, not been used during the year for long- term investment.

(xvi) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has made preferential allotment of shares to a Company covered in the Register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 at a price which, in our opinion, is prima facie not prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us, during the period covered by our audit report, no debentures have been issued by the Company and hence the question of creating securities or charges in respect thereof does not arise.

(xviii) The Management has disclosed the end use of money raised by FCCB Issue and QIB Issue in the notes 29.6 and 29.8 of the financial statements respectively and we have verified the same.

(xix) To the best of our knowledge and according to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud by the Company and no material fraud on the Company has been noticed or reported during the year.

For Deloitte Haskins & Sells

Chartered Accountants

(Registration No. 117365W)

Gaurav J Shah

Ahmedabad Partner

7th May, 2013 (Membership No. 35701)


Mar 31, 2012

1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of SINTEX INDUSTRIES LIMITED ("the Company") as at 31st March, 2012, the Statement of Profit and Loss and the Cash Flow Statement of the Company for the year ended on that date, both annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatements. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and the significant estimates made by the Management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

3. Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to Note 29.3 to these financial statements, regarding the Scheme of Arrangement (the "Scheme") approved by the Honourable High Court of Gujarat, as per which Scheme, in the year 2008-09 the Company earmarked Rs. 200 crore from Securities Premium Account to International Business Development Reserve Account (the "IBDR") and has adjusted against the earmarked balance of IBDR, Rs. 192.15 crore upto 31st March, 2012 (including Rs. 4.42 crore during the year) being expenses of the nature as specified under the Scheme. The said accounting treatment has been followed as prescribed under the Scheme. The relevant Indian Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, in absence of such Scheme, would not permit the adjustment of such expenses against the Securities Premium Reserve / IBDR. Had the Company accounted for these expenses as per Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in India, instead of accounting for as per the Scheme, the balance of Securities Premium Reserve / IBDR would have been higher by Rs. 192.15 crore as at 31st March, 2012 and profit after tax would have been lower by Rs. 4.42 crore for the year ended on 31st March, 2012.

4. As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 (CARO) issued by the Central Government in terms of Section 227(4A) of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.

5. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 4 above, we report as follows:

(a) we have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

(b) in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books;

(c) the Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

(d) in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in compliance with the Accounting Standards referred to in Section 211(3C) of the Companies Act, 1956;

(e) in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956 in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

(i) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31st March, 2012;

(ii) in the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the profit for the year ended on that date ; and

(iii) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

6. On the basis of the written representations received from the Directors as on 31st March, 2012 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the Directors is disqualified as on 31st March, 2012 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 274(1)(g) of the Companies Act, 1956.

(Referred to in paragraph 4 of our report of even date)

(i) Having regard to the nature of the Company's business/ activities/result, clauses (x), (xiii) and (xiv) of CARO are not applicable.

(ii) In respect of its fixed assets:

(a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of the fixed assets.

(b) The fixed assets were physically verified during the year by the Management in accordance with a regular programme of verification which, in our opinion, provides for physical verification of all the fixed assets at reasonable intervals. According to the information and explanations given to us, no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

(c) The fixed assets disposed off during the year, in our opinion, do not constitute a substantial part of the fixed assets of the Company and such disposal has, in our opinion, not affected the going concern status of the Company.

(iii) In respect of its inventory:

(a) As explained to us, the inventories were physically verified during the year by the Management at reasonable intervals.

(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the Management were reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

(c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of its inventories and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.

(iv) The Company has neither granted nor taken any loans, secured or unsecured, to/from companies, firms or other parties listed in the Register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(v) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, having regard to the explanations that some of the items purchased are of special nature and suitable alternative sources are not readily available for obtaining comparable quotations, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard to purchases of inventory and fixed assets and the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any major weakness in such internal control system.

(vi) According to the information and explanations given to us, there were no contracts or arrangement referred to in Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 which were required to be entered in the register maintained under that section.

(vii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not accepted any deposits during the year from public within the meaning of provisions of section 58A and 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and rules made thereunder.

(viii) In our opinion, the internal audit functions carried out during the year by a firm of Chartered Accountants appointed by the Management have been commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

(ix) We have broadly reviewed the cost records maintained by the Company pursuant to the Companies (Cost Accounting Records) Rules, 2011 prescribed by the Central Government under Section 209(1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 and are of the opinion that prima facie the prescribed cost records have been made and maintained. We have, however, not made a detailed examination of the cost records with a view to determining whether they are accurate or complete.

(x) According to the information and explanations given to us in respect of statutory dues:

(a) The Company has generally been regular in depositing undisputed dues, including Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees' State Insurance, Income-tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues applicable to it with the appropriate authorities.

(b) There were no undisputed amounts payable in respect of Income-tax, Wealth Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues in arrears as at 31st March, 2012 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(c) Details of dues of Value added Tax and Central Sales Tax which have not been deposited as on 31st March, 2012 on account of disputes are given below:

Statute Nature of Dues Forum where dispute Period to which the Amount involved is pending amount relates (Rs.in crores)

Central Sales Tax Central Sales Tax Additional Commissioner, Uluberia, 2008-09 0.25 Act, 1956 West Bengal

Central Sales Tax Central Sales Tax CTO Circle C, Jaipur, 2007-08 and 0.43 Act, 1956 Rajasthan 2008-09

Rajasthan Value Added Value Added Tax CTO Circle C, Jaipur, 2007-08 and 1.67 Tax Act, 2003 Rajasthan 2008-09

(xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not defaulted in the repayment of dues to banks, financial institutions and debenture holders.

(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not given any loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

(xiii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the terms and conditions of the guarantees given by the Company for loans taken by others from banks and financial institutions are not prima facie prejudicial to the interests of the Company.

x(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the term loans have been applied for the purposes for which they were obtained.

(xv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet, we report that funds raised on short-term basis have not been used during the year for long- term investment.

(xvi) The Company has not made preferential allotment of shares to parties and companies covered in the Register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(xvii) The Company has not issued any debentures during the year.

(xviii) The Management has disclosed the end use of money raised by FCCB issue as per note 29.4 and we have verified the same.

(xix) To the best of our knowledge and according to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud by the Company and no fraud on the Company has been noticed or reported during the year.

For Deloitte Haskins & Sells

Chartered Accountants

(Registration No. 117365W)

Gaurav J Shah

Ahmedabad Partner

10th May, 2012 (Membership No. 35701)


Mar 31, 2011

1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of SINTEX INDUSTRIES LIMITED ("the Company") as at March 31, 2011, the Profit and Loss Account and the Cash Flow Statement of the Company for the year ended on that date, both annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatements. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and the significant estimates made by the Management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

3. Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to Note 4 of Schedule 20 to these financial statements, regarding the Scheme of Arrangement (the "Scheme") approved by the Honourable High Court of Gujarat, as per which Scheme, in the year 2008-09 the Company earmarked Rs.200 crore from Securities Premium Reserve to International Business Development Reserve Account (the "IBDR") and has adjusted against the earmarked balance of IBDR, Rs.187.73 crore upto March 31, 2011 (including Rs.46.47 crore during the year) being expenses of the nature as specified under the Scheme. The said accounting treatment has been followed as prescribed under the Scheme. The relevant Indian Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, in absence of such Scheme, would not permit the adjustment of such expenses against the Securities Premium Reserve / IBDR. Had the Company accounted for these expenses as per Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in India, instead of accounting for as per the Scheme, the balance of Securities Premium Reserve / IBDR would have been higher by Rs.187.73 crore as at March 31, 2011 and profit after tax would have been lower by Rs.46.47 crore for the year ended on March 31, 2011.

4. As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 (CARO) issued by the Central Government in terms of Section 227(4A) of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.

5. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 4 above, we report as follows:

a) we have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

b) in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books;

c) the Balance Sheet, the Profit and Loss Account and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

d) in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, the Profit and Loss Account and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in compliance with the Accounting Standards referred to in Section 211(3C) of the Companies Act, 1956;

e) in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956 in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

i) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31, 2011;

ii) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the profit for the year ended on that date ; and

iii) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date

6. On the basis of the written representations received from the Directors as on March 31, 2011 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the Directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2011 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 274(1)(g) of the Companies Act, 1956.

Annexure to the Auditors' Report (Referred to in paragraph 4 of our report of even date)

i) Having regard to the nature of the Company's business/activities/result, clauses (x), (xiii) and (xiv) of CARO are not applicable.

ii) In respect of its fixed assets:

a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of the fixed assets.

b) The fixed assets were physically verified during the year by the Management in accordance with a regular programme of verification which, in our opinion, provides for physical verification of all the fixed assets at reasonable intervals. According to the information and explanation given to us, no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

c) The fixed assets disposed off during the year, in our opinion, do not constitute a substantial part of the fixed assets of the Company and such disposal has, in our opinion, not affected the going concern status of the Company.

iii) In respect of its inventory:

a) As explained to us, the inventories were physically verified during the year by the Management at reasonable intervals.

b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanation given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the Management were reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of its inventories and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.

iv) The Company has neither granted nor taken any loans, secured or unsecured, to/from companies, firms or other parties listed in the Register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

v) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, having regard to the explanations that some of the items purchased are of special nature and suitable alternative sources are not readily available for obtaining comparable quotations, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard to purchases of inventory and fixed assets and the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any major weakness in such internal control system.

vi) According to the information and explanation given to us, there were no contracts or arrangement referred to in Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 which were required to be entered in the register maintained under that section.

vii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not accepted any deposit from the public during the year. In respect of unclaimed deposits, the Company has complied with the provisions of Sections 58A & 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956.

viii) In our opinion, the internal audit functions carried out during the year by a firm of Chartered Accountants appointed by the Management have been commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

ix) We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the Company pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under Section 209(1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 in respect of textile division and are of the opinion that prima facie the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have, however, not made a detailed examination of the records with a view to determining whether they are accurate or complete. To the best of our knowledge and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost records for any other product of the Company.

x) According to the information and explanations given to us in

respect of statutory dues:

a) The Company has generally been regular in depositing undisputed dues, including Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees' State Insurance, Income-tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues applicable to it with the appropriate authorities.

b) There were no undisputed amounts payable in respect of Income-tax, Wealth Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues in arrears as at March 31, 2011 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

c) Details of dues of Value Added Tax and Central Sales Tax which have not been deposited as on March 31, 2011 on account of disputes are given below:

Statue Nature of Dues Forum where Period to which the Amount involved Dispute is pending amount relates (Rs. in crores)

Central Sales Tax Central Sales Tax JointCommissi oner, Uluberia, 2008-09 0.25 Act,1956 West Bengal

Central Sales Tax Central Sales Tax CTO Circle C, Jaipur, 2007-08 & 0.43 2008-09 Act,1956 Rajasthan

Rajasthan Value Added Value Added Tax CTO Circle C, Jaipur, 2007-08 & 1.67 2008-09 Tax Act, 2003 Rajasthan

xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not defaulted in the repayment of dues to banks, financial institutions and debenture holders.

xii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not given any loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

xiii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the terms and conditions of the guarantees given by the Company for loans taken by others from banks and financial institutions are not prima facie prejudicial to the interests of the Company.

xiv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the term loans have been applied for the purposes for which they were obtained.

xv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet, we report that funds raised on short-term basis have not been used during the year for long- term investment.

xvi) The Company has not made preferential allotment of shares to parties and companies covered in the Register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us, during the period covered by our audit report, the Company had issued 3500 - 9% Secured Redeemable Non-Convertible Debentures of Rs.10,00,000 each. The Company has created security in respect of the debentures issued.

xviii) The Management has disclosed the end use of money raised by FCCB issue as per Note no.5 of schedule-20 and we have verified the same.

xix) To the best of our knowledge and according to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud by the Company and no fraud on the Company has been noticed or reported during the year.

For Deloitte Haskins & Sells

Chartered Accountants (Registration No. 117365W)

Gaurav J. Shah Ahmedabad Partner Date: April 30, 2011 Membership No. 35701










Mar 31, 2010

1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of SINTEX INDUSTRIES LIMITED ("the Company") as at 31st March, 2010, the Profit and Loss Account and the Cash Flow Statement of the Company for the year ended on that date, both annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatements. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and the significant estimates made by the Management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

3. Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to Note 4 of Schedule 20 to these financial statements, regarding the Scheme of Arrangement (the "Scheme") approved by the Honourable High Court of Gujarat, as per which Scheme, in the year 2008-09 the Company earmarked Rs, 200 crore from Securities Premium Reserve to International Business Development Reserve Account (the "IBDR") and has adjusted against the earmarked balance of IBDR, Rs, 141.46 crore upto 31st March, 2010 (including Rs, 10.53 crores during the year) being expenses of the nature as specified under the Scheme. The said accounting treatment has been followed as prescribed under the Scheme. The relevant Indian Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, in absence of such Scheme, would not permit the adjustment of expenses against the Securities Premium Reserve / IBDR. Had the Company accounted for these expenses as per Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in India, instead of accounting for as per the Scheme, the balance of Securities Premium Reserve / IBDR would have been higher by Rs, 141.46 crore as at 31st March, 2010 and Profit after tax would have been lower by Rs, 10.53 crore for the year ended on 31st March, 2010.

4. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 (CARO) issued by the Central Government in terms of Section 227(4A) of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs

4 and 5 of the said Order.

5. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 3 above, we report as follows:

a) we have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

b) in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books;

c) the Balance Sheet, the Profit and Loss Account and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

d) in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, the Profit and Loss Account and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in compliance with the Accounting Standards referred to in Section 211(3C) of the Companies Act, 1956;

e) in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956 in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

i) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of the affairs of the Company as at March 31, 2010;

ii) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the profit for the year ended on that date; and

iii) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

6. On the basis of the written representations received from the Directors as on 31st March, 2010 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the Directors is disqualified as on 31st March, 2010 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 274(1)(g) of the Companies Act, 1956. Annexure to the Auditors Report (Referred to in paragraph 4 of our report of even date)

i. Having regard to the nature of the Companys business/activities/ result, clauses (x), (xiii) and (xiv) of CARO are not applicable.

ii. In respect of its fixed assets:

a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of the fixed assets.

b) The fixed assets were physically verified during the year by the Management in accordance with a regular programme of verification which, in our opinion, provides for physical verification of all the fixed assets at reasonable intervals. According to the information and explanation given to us, no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

c) The fixed assets disposed off during the year, in our opinion, do not constitute a substantial part of the fixed assets of the Company and such disposal has, in our opinion, not affected the going concern status of the Company.

iii) In respect of its inventory:

a) As explained to us, the inventories were physically verified during the year by the Management at reasonable intervals.

b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanation given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the Management were reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of its inventories and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.

iv) The Company has neither granted nor taken any loans, secured or unsecured, to/from companies, firms or other

parties listed in the Register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

v) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, having regard to the explanations that some of the items purchased are of special nature and suitable alternative sources are not readily available for obtaining comparable quotations, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard to purchases of inventory and fixed assets and the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any major weakness in such internal control system.

vi) According to information and explanation given to us, there were no contracts or arrangement referred to in Section 301 of Companies Act, 1956 which were required to be entered in the register maintained under that section.

vii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not accepted any deposit from the public during the year. In respect of unclaimed deposits, the Company has complied with the provisions of Sections 58A & 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956.

viii) In our opinion, the internal audit functions carried out during the year by firm of Chartered Accountants appointed by the Management have been commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

ix) We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the Company pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under Section 209(1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 in respect of textile division and are of the opinion that prima facie the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have, however, not made a detailed examination of the records with a view to determining whether they are accurate or complete. To the best of our

knowledge and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost records for any other product of the Company.

x) According to the information and explanations given to us in respect of statutory dues:

a) The Company has generally been regular in depositing undisputed dues, including Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees State Insurance, Income-tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues applicable to it with the appropriate authorities.

b) There were no undisputed amounts payable in respect of Income-tax, Wealth Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues in arrears as at 31st March, 2010 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

c) According to the information and explanations given to us, there are no dues of Income-tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty and Cess which have not been deposited as on 31st March, 2010 on account of disputes.

xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not defaulted in the repayment of dues to banks, financial institutions and debenture holders.

xii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not given any loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

xiii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the terms and conditions of the guarantees given by the Company for loans taken by others from banks and financial institutions are not prima facie prejudicial to the interests of the Company.

xiv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the term loans have been applied for the purposes for which they were obtained.

xv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet, we report that funds raised on short-term basis have not been used during the year for long- term investment.

xvi) The Company has not made preferential allotment of shares to parties and companies covered in the Register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

xvii) According to the information and explanation given to us, during the period covered by our audit report, the Company has not issued debentures. The Company has created security in respect of the debentures already issued.

xviii) The Management has disclosed the end use of money raised by FCCB issue and QIP issue and we have verified the same.

xix) To the best of our knowledge and according to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud by the Company and no fraud on the Company has been noticed or reported during the year.

For Deloitte Haskins & Sells

Chartered Accountants

(Registration No. 117365W)

Gaurav J. Shah Ahmedabad Partner

Date: April 30, 2010 Membership No. 35701

 
Subscribe now to get personal finance updates in your inbox!