Home  »  Company  »  SRS Finance Ltd.  »  Quotes  »  Auditor Report
Enter the first few characters of Company and click 'Go'

Auditor Report of SRS Finance Ltd.

Mar 31, 2016

To

The Members of SRS FINANCE LIMITED, Faridabad.

Report on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of SRS FINANCE LIMITED ("the Company") which comprise the Balance Sheet as at March 31, 2016, the Statement of Profit and Loss, Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

The Company''s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act") with respect to the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor''s Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made there under.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant to the Company''s preparation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on whether the Company has in place an adequate internal financial controls system over financial reporting and the operating effectiveness of such controls. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Company''s Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the financial statements.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31, 2016, and its Profit/Loss and its Cash Flow for the year ended on that date.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2016 ("the Order"), as amended, issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (11) of section 143 of the Act, we give in the "Annexure A" a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.

2. As required by section 143 (3) of the Act, we report that:

(a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;

(b) In our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books;

(c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account.

(d) In our opinion, the aforesaid financial statements comply with the Accounting Standards specified under section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014.

(e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors as on March 31, 2016 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2016 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164 (2) of the Act.

(f) With respect to the adequacy of the internal financial controls over financial reporting of the Company and the operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to our separate Report in "Annexure B".

(g) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor''s Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i. The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position in its financial statements - Refer Note 2.27 to the financial statements;

ii. The Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses

iii. There were no amounts which were required to be transferred to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.

“Annexure A” to the Independent Auditors'' Report

Referred to in paragraph 1 under the heading ''Report on Other Legal & Regulatory Requirement'' of our report of even date to the financial statements of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2016:

1) Fixed Assets [Clause 3(i)]:

(a) Proper Records: The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) Physical Verification: As explained to us the fixed assets have been physically verified by the management during the year, which in our opinion is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and nature of its business. No material discrepancies between the book records and the physical fixed assets have been noticed.

(c ) Title Deed: The title deeds of immovable properties are held in the name of the company

2) Inventory [Clause 3(ii)]:

Physical Verification: The Company is an NBFC and has not dealt with any goods and the Company does not hold any inventory except Inventory of Securities during the year under audit. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 3(ii) of the order, regarding physical verification of Inventory are not applicable to the Company.

The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory. As far as we could ascertain and according to the information and explanations given to us, no material discrepancies were noticed between the stock records and financial records.

3) Loan given by the company [Clause 3(iii)]:

The Company has granted loans to bodies corporate covered in the register maintained under section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013 (''the Act'').

(a) Terms and conditions: The terms and conditions of the grant of such loans are not prejudicial to the company''s interest.

(b) Regular Recovery: In the case of the loans granted to the bodies corporate listed in the register maintained under section 189 of the Act, the borrowers have been regular in the payment of the interest as stipulated. The terms of arrangements do not stipulate any repayment schedule and the loans are repayable on demand. Accordingly, this clause of the order is not applicable to the Company in respect of repayment of the principal amount.

(c) Steps for recovery: The total amount overdue for more than 90 days is Rs. 3,02,00,223.83 and reasonable steps have been taken by the company for recovery of the principal and interest.

4) Loan to directors and investment by company [Clause 3(iv)]:

Provisions of section 185 and 186 of the Companies Act, 2013 does not apply to the Company with reference to the business carried on by it during the year ended on 31st March, 2016.

5) Deposits [Clause 3(v)]:

In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us ,the Company has not accepted any deposits from the public and consequently, the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and the provisions of Sections 73 to 76 or any other provision of the Companies Act and the rules framed there under are not applicable to the company.

6) Cost Records [Clause 3(vi)]:

As informed to us, the maintenance of Cost Records has not been specified by the Central Government under subsection (1) of Section 148 of the Act, in respect of the activities carried on by the company.

7) Statutory Dues [Clause 3(vii)]:

(a) According to information and explanations given to us and on the basis of our examination of the books of account, and records, the Company has been generally regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues including Provident Fund, Employees State Insurance, Income-Tax, Sales tax, Service Tax, Duty of Customs, Duty of Excise, Value added Tax, Cess and any other statutory dues with the appropriate authorities. According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of the above were in arrears as at March 31, 2016 for a period of more than six months from the date on when they become payable.

(b) According to the information and explanation given to us, there are no dues of income tax, sales tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value added tax outstanding on account of any dispute.

(Rs. in Lac)

Nature of

Amount

Year

Deposited

Forum where

dues

under protest

dispute is pending

Income Tax

23.77

1996-97

12.00

ITAT, New Delhi

8) Repayment of Loans [Clause 3(viii)]:

In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not defaulted in the repayment of dues to banks. The Company has not taken any loan either from financial institutions or from the government and has not issued any debentures.

9) Utilization of IPO and further public offer [Clause 3(ix)]:

Based upon the audit procedures performed and the information and explanations given by the management, the company has not raised moneys by way of initial public offer or further public offer including debt instruments and term Loans. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 3 (ix) of the Order are not applicable to the Company and hence not commented upon.

10) Reporting of fraud [Clause 3(x)]:

Based upon the audit procedures performed and the information and explanations given by the management, we report that no fraud by the Company or on the company by its officers or employees has been noticed or reported during the year.

11) Approval of Managerial Remuneration [Clause 3(xi)]:

Based upon the audit procedures performed and the information and explanations given by the management, the managerial remuneration has been paid or provided in accordance with the requisite approvals mandated by the provisions of section 197 read with Schedule V to the Companies Act;

12) Nidhi company [Clause 3(xii)]:

In our opinion, the Company is not a Nidhi Company. Therefore, this clause of the order is not applicable to the Company.

13) Related Party Transaction [Clause 3(xiii)]:

In our opinion, all transactions with the related parties are in compliance with section 177 and 188 of Companies Act, 2013 and the details have been disclosed in the Financial Statements as required by the applicable accounting standards.

14) Private Placements or Preferential Issues [Clause 3(xiv)]:

Based upon the audit procedures performed and the information and explanations given by the management, the company has not made any preferential allotment or private placement of shares or fully or partly convertible debentures during the year under review. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 3 (xiv) of the Order are not applicable to the Company and hence not commented upon.

15) Non Cash Transactions [Clause 3(xv)]:

Based upon the audit procedures performed and the information and explanations given by the management, the company has not entered into any non-cash transactions with directors or persons connected with him. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 3 (xv) of the Order are not applicable to the Company and hence not commented upon.

16) Register under RBI Act, 1934 [Clause 3(xvi)]:

In our opinion, the company is required to be registered under section 45 IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 and accordingly, the company has obtained registration, Reg. No. N-14.03202

"Annexure B" to the Independent Auditor''s Report of even date on the Standalone Financial Statements of SRS FINANCE LIMITED the Internal Financial Controls under Clause (i) of Sub-section 3 of Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act")

We have audited the internal financial controls over financial reporting of SRS FINANCE LIMITED as of March 31, 2016 in conjunction with our audit of the standalone financial statements of the Company for the year ended on that date.

Management''s Responsibility for Internal Financial Controls

The Company''s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal financial controls based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. These responsibilities include the design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls that were operating effectively for ensuring the orderly and efficient conduct of its business, including adherence to company''s policies, the safeguarding of its assets, the prevention and detection of frauds and errors, the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, and the timely preparation of reliable financial information, as required under the Companies Act, 2013.

Auditors'' Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company''s internal financial controls over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting (the "Guidance Note") and the Standards on Auditing, issued by ICAI and deemed to be prescribed under section 143(10) of the Companies Act, 2013, to the extent applicable to an audit of internal financial controls, both applicable to an audit of Internal Financial Controls and, both issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards and the Guidance Note require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether adequate internal financial controls over financial reporting was established and maintained and if such controls operated effectively in all material respects.

Our audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the adequacy of the internal financial controls system over financial reporting and their operating effectiveness. Our audit of internal financial controls over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal financial controls over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the Company''s internal financial controls system over financial reporting.

Meaning of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting

A company''s internal financial control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company''s internal financial control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company''s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Inherent Limitations of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting

Because of the inherent limitations of internal financial controls over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of the internal financial controls over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the internal financial control over financial reporting may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Opinion

In our opinion, the Company has, in all material respects, an adequate internal financial controls system over financial reporting and such internal financial controls over financial reporting were operating effectively as at March 31, 2016, based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.

For SVP & Associates

Chartered Accountants

FRN:003838N

(CA Vijay Kumar Chopra)

(Partner)

Membership No. 054600

Place: Faridabad

Date: 30-05-2016


Mar 31, 2015

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of SRS FINANCE LIMITED ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at March 31, 2015, and the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and notes to Financial Statements comprising of a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information

Management's Responsibility for the Financial Statements

The Company's Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act") with respect to the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor's Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made thereunder.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant to the Company's preparation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on whether the Company has in place an adequate internal financial controls system over financial reporting and the operating effectiveness of such controls. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Company's Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on these financial statements.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

a) In the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31, 2015;

b) In the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the profit for the year ended on that date; and

c) In the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

(i) As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2015 issued by the Central government of India in the terms of Section 143 of the Companies Act 2013, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in Paragraph 3 & 4 of the order.

(ii) As required by Section 143 (3) of the Act, we report that:

(a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit.

(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books.

(c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account.

(d) In our opinion, the aforesaid financial statements comply with the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014.

(e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on 31st March, 2015 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March, 2015 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164 (2) of the Act.

(f) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor's Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i. The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position in its financial statements - Refer Note 2.27 to the financial statements;

ii. The Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses;

iii. There were no amounts which were required to be transferred to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.

Annexure To The Auditors' Report

(As referred in paragraph (1) 'Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements 'of our report to the members of

SRS FINANCE LIMITED on the accounts for the year ended March 31, 2015)

(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) As explained to us, major fixed assets have been physically verified by the management during the year. In our opinion, the frequency of physical verification is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and nature of its assets. No discrepancies were noticed on such verification as compared to book records.

(ii) The Company is an NBFC and has not dealt with any goods and the Company does not hold any inventory except Inventory of Securities during the year under audit. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 3(ii)(a) and 3(ii)(b) of the order, regarding physical verification of Inventory are not applicable to the Company.

(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory. As far as we could ascertain and according to the information and explanations given to us, no material discrepancies were noticed between the stock records and financial records.

(iii) The Company has granted loans to bodies corporate covered in the register maintained under section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013 ('the Act').

(a) In the case of the loans granted to the bodies corporate listed in the register maintained under section 189 of the Act, the borrowers have been regular in the payment of the interest as stipulated. The terms of arrangements do not stipulate any repayment schedule and the loans are repayable on demand. Accordingly, this clause of the order is not applicable to the Company in respect of repayment of the principal amount.

(b) There are no overdue amounts of more than rupees one lakh in respect of the loans granted to the bodies corporate listed in the register maintained under section 189 of the Act.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there exists an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of its business with regard to purchases of fixed assets and with regard to sale of goods and rendering of services. During the course of our audit, we have neither come across nor have been informed of any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in the aforesaid internal control system of the company.

(v) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us ,the Company has not accepted any deposits from the public and consequently, the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and the provisions of Sections 73 to 76 or any other provision of the Companies Act and the rules framed there under are not applicable to the company.

(vi) According to information and explanations given to us, the Central Government has not prescribed maintenance of cost records under sub-section (1) of section 148 of the Companies Act in respect of services carried out by the company. Therefore, provisions of Clause 3 (vi) of the order are not applicable to the company.

(vii) (a) The Company, has been regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including Provident Fund, Employees' State Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Duty of Customs, Duty of Excise, Value Added Tax, Cess and any other material statutory dues applicable to it. According to information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of Provident Fund, Employees' State Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Duty of Customs, Duty of Excise, Value Added Tax and Cess were in arrears as at March 31,2015 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, except the dues given in table below, there are no dues of Sales Tax, Income Tax, Custom Duty, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Excise Duty and Cess, which have not been deposited on account of any dispute.

(Rs. in Lacs)

Nature of Amount Year Deposited Forum where dues under protest dispute is pending

Income Tax 23.77 1996-97 12.00 ITAT, New Delhi

(c) No amounts were required to be transferred to investor education and protection fund. Hence, clause 3 (vii) ( c) of the order is not applicable to the company.

(viii) The company has no accumulated losses at the end of the financial year. Further, the company has not incurred cash losses during the current financial year and the immediately preceding financial year.

(ix) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to its Bankers. The Company did not have any outstanding debentures or any outstanding loans from any financial institution during the year.

(x) As per information and explanations given to us, the Company has not given any corporate guarantee for loans taken by the company from banks or financial institutions during the year covered under audit. Therefore, clause 3 (x) of the order is not applicable to the company.

(xi) The Company has not taken any term loan from the banks during the year. Therefore, the provisions of Clause 3(xi) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the company has been noticed or reported during the year.



For Naresh Jai & Associates (Chartered Accountants) Firm Regn. No. 019082N

CA Naresh Goyal (Partner) Membership No. 501487 Place: Faridabad Date: 22.05.2015


Mar 31, 2014

Report on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of SRS FINANCE LIMITED ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at March 31st, 2014 and the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and notes to Financial Statements comprising of a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the Accounting Standards referred under the Companies Act, 1956 ("The Act") read with the General Circular 15/2013 dated 13 September 2013 of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs in respect of section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013. This includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor''s Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatements of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Company''s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity''s internal control. An audit also includes evaluation of the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

(a) In the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31, 2014;

(b) In the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the profit/loss for the year ended on that date; and

(c) In the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Report on other Legal and Regulatory requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Act, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 & 5 of the Order.

2. As required by section 227 (3) of the Act, we report that:

(a) We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

(c) The Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

(d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit & Loss and Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards referred under the Companies Act, 1956 read with the General Circular 15/2013 dated September 13, 2013 of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs in respect of section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013;

(e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors as on March 31, 2014 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the Directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2014 from being appointed as a Director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.

Referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date

i. (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) As explained to us, major fixed assets have been physically verified by the management during the year. In our opinion, the frequency of physical verification is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such verification as compared to book records.

(c) Fixed assets disposed off during the year were not substantial and therefore, do not affect the going concern assumption.

ii. The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory. As far as we could ascertain and according to the information and explanations given to us, no material discrepancies were noticed between the stock records and the financial records.

The Company is an NBFC and has not dealt with any goods and the Company does not hold any inventory except Inventory of Securities during the year under audit. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(ii) of the order, regarding physical verification of Inventory are not applicable to the Company.

iii. (a) The company has granted Loans & Advances in the previous year to three parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. A sum of Rs. 1,621.19 lacs is outstanding in the opening of the financial year. During the year, company has granted Loans and advances of Rs. 14.00 lacs to one party covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

Maximum amount involved during the year was Rs. 1,609.68 lacs and the year-end balance of loans given to such parties was Rs. 1,140.26 lacs.

(b) In our opinion, the rate of interest wherever stipulated, and other terms and conditions for such loans are not, prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the company.

(c) The repayment of the principal amount of loan given and interest has been regular.

(d) There is no overdue amount in excess of rupees one lakh in respect of loans of the aforesaid parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(e) The Company has not taken any loan from the companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(iii) (e), (f) and (g) of the order, are not applicable to the Company.

iv. In our opinion and according to the information and explanation given to us, there exists an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard to purchases of inventory, fixed assets and with regard to the sale of shares and services. During the course of our audit, we have neither come across nor have been informed of any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in the aforesaid internal control system of the Company.

v. (a) According to information and explanations given to us, we are of the opinion that the particulars of all contracts or arrangements that need to be entered into the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been so entered.

(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts or arrangements entered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 and exceeding the value of rupees five lakhs in respect of any party during the year have been made at prices which are reasonable having regard to prevailing market prices at the relevant time.

vi. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not accepted any deposits from the public and consequently, the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India, the provisions of Section 58A, 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the rules framed there under are not applicable to the Company.

vii. In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with the size and nature of its business and activities.

viii. According to information and explanation given to us, the Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost records under Section 209(1)(d) of the Companies Act, 1956 in respect of business carried out by the Company. Therefore, provisions of Clause 4(viii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

ix. (a) The Company has been generally regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Service Tax, Wealth Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and any other material statutory dues applicable to it.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty and Cess were in arrear as at 31st March 2014 for a period of more than six months from the date they become payable.

(c) According to the information and explanations given to us, except the dues given in table below, there are no dues of Sales Tax, Income Tax, Custom Duty, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Excise Duty and Cess, which have not been deposited on account of any dispute.

(Rs. in Lacs)

Nature of Amount Year Deposited Forum where dispute dues under protest is pending

Income Tax 23.77 1996-97 12.00 ITAT, New Delhi

x. The company has accumulated losses of Rs. 2,50,50,448 as at 31st March 2014 and has not incurred any cash losses during the financial year covered by our audit and cash losses of Rs. 12,06,63,899 in the immediately preceding financial year.

xi. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to its Bankers. The Company did not have any outstanding debentures or any outstanding loans from any financial institution during the year.

xii. In our opinion and according to the information & explanation given to us, the Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities. Therefore, the provisions of Clause 4(xii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xiii. In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/ mutual benefit fund/ society. Therefore, the provisions of Clause 4(xiii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xiv. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of transactions for dealing in or trading in shares, securities and other investments and shares and other securities have been held by the company in its own name.

xv. As per the information and explanations given to us, the company had given a corporate guarantee amounting Rs. 55 Cr. for loans taken by others from bank or financial institutions, but the loans for which the guarantees was given, has been repaid during the year and terms and conditions whereof are not prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

xvi. To the best of our information and knowledge and as per records verified by us, the Company has not availed any term loan during the year. Therefore, the provisions of Clause 4(xvi) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xvii. According to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the Company, we report that no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term investment.

xviii. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not made preferential allotment of shares during the year. Therefore, the provisions of Clause 4(xviii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xix. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not issued any debentures. Therefore, the provisions of Clause 4(xix) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xx. The Company has not raised any money by means of public issue during the year. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xx) of the Order are not applicable to the Company

xxi. According to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.

For Naresh Jai & Associates

(Chartered Accountants)

Firm Regn. No. 019082N

CA Naresh Goyal

(Partner)

Membership No. 501487

Place : Faridabad

Date : 26.05.2014


Mar 31, 2013

Report on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of SRS FINANCE LIMITED ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at March 31, 2013, and the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and notes to Financial Statements comprising of a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act"). This includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor''s Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatements of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Company''s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluation of the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

(a) In the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31, 2013;

(b) In the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the profit/loss for the year ended on that date; and

(c) In the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Report on other Legal and Regulatory requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 ("the Order") issued by the Central

Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Act, we give in the Annexure a

statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 & 5 of the Order.

2. As required by section 227 (3) of the Act, we report that:

(a) We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

(c) The Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

(d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit & Loss and Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956;

(e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors as on March 31, 2013 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the Directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2013 from being appointed as a Director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.

i. (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) As explained to us, major fixed assets have been physically verified by the management during the year. In our opinion, the frequency of physical verification is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such verification as compared to book records.

(c) There is no disposal of fixed assets during the year.

ii. The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory. As far as we could ascertain and according to the information and explanations given to us, no material discrepancies were noticed between the stock records and the financial records.

The Company is a NBFC and has not dealt with any goods and the Company does not hold any inventory except Inventory of Securities during the year under audit. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(ii) of the order, regarding physical verification of Inventory are not applicable to the Company.

iii. (a) The company has granted Loans & Advances to 4 parties covered in the register maintained under section

301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Maximum amount involved during the year was Rs. 1,996.90 lacs and the year-end balance of loans given to such parties was Rs. 1621.19 lacs.

(b) In our opinion, the rate of interest wherever stipulated, and other terms and conditions for such loans are not, prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the company.

(c ) The repayment of the principal amount of loan given and interest has been regular.

(d) There is no overdue amount in excess of rupees one lakh in respect of loans of the aforesaid parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(e) The Company had taken loan from 1 company covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The maximum amount involved during the year was Rs. 832.00 lacs and the year-end balance of loans taken from such parties was Rs. Nil.

(f) In our opinion, the rate of interest wherever stipulated, and other terms and conditions for such loans taken from companies listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act 1956 are not, prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the company.

(g) The repayment of the principal amount of loan taken and interest has been regular.

iv. In our opinion and according to the information and explanation given to us, there exists an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard to purchases of inventory, fixed assets and with regard to the sale of shares and services. During the course of our audit, we have neither come across nor have been informed of any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in the aforesaid internal control system of the Company.

v. (a) According to information and explanations given to us, we are of the opinion that the particulars of all contracts or arrangements that need to be entered into the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been so entered.

(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts or arrangements entered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 and exceeding the value of rupees five lakhs in respect of any party during the year have been made at prices which are reasonable having regard to prevailing market prices at the relevant time.

vi. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not accepted any deposits from the public and consequently, the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India, the provisions of Section 58A, 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the rules framed there under are not applicable to the Company.

vii. In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with the size and nature of its business and activities.

viii. According to information and explanation given to us, the Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost records under Section 209(1)(d) of the Companies Act, 1956 in respect of business carried out by the Company. Therefore, provisions of Clause 4(viii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

ix. (a) The Company has been generally regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory

dues including Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Service Tax, Wealth Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and any other material statutory dues applicable to it.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty and Cess were in arrear as at 31st March 2013 for a period of more than six months from the date they become payable.

(c) According to the information and explanations given to us, except the dues given in table below, there are no dues of Sales Tax, Income Tax, Custom Duty, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Excise Duty and Cess, which have not been deposited on account of any dispute.

(Rs. in Lacs)

Nature of Amount Year Deposited Forum where dues under protest dispute is pending

Income Tax 23.77 1996-97 12.00 ITAT, New Delhi

Income Tax 23.15 2008-09 11.58 Commissioner Appeal, New Delhi

x. The company has accumulated losses of Rs.6,55,73,020 as at 31st March 2013 and has incurred cash loss of Rs. 12,06,63,899 during the financial year covered by our audit and no cash loss in the immediately preceding financial year.

xi. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to its Bankers. The Company did not have any outstanding debentures or any outstanding loans from any financial institution during the year.

xii. In our opinion and according to the information & explanation given to us, the Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

xiii. In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/ mutual benefit fund/ society. Therefore, the provisions of Clause 4(xiii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xiv. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of transactions for dealing in or trading in shares, securities and other investments and shares and other securities have been held by the company in its own name.

xv. As per the information and explanations given to us, the Company has given Corporate guarantees amounting Rs. 25 Cr for loans taken by SRS Limited from bank and Rs 30 Cr for loan taken by SRS Real Infrastructure Limited from bank and term and conditions whereof are not prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

xvi. To the best of our information and knowledge and as per records verified by us, the Company has not availed any term loan during the year. Therefore, the provisions of Clause 4(xvi) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xvii. According to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the Company, we report that no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term investment.

xviii. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not made preferential allotment of shares during the year. Therefore, the provisions of Clause 4(xviii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xix. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not issued any debentures. Therefore, the provisions of Clause 4(xix) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xx. The Company has not raised any money by means of public issue during the year. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xx) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xxi. According to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.

For Naresh Jai & Associates

Chartered Accountants

Firm Regn. No. 019082N



CA Naresh Goyal

(Partner)

Membership No. 501487



Place: Faridabad

Date: 27.05.2013


Mar 31, 2012

Report on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of SRS FINANCE LIMITED ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at March 31, 2013, and the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and notes to Financial Statements comprising of a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act"). This includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor''s Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatements of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Company''s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluation of the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

(a) In the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31, 2013;

(b) In the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the profit/loss for the year ended on that date; and

(c) In the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Report on other Legal and Regulatory requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Act, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 & 5 of the Order.

2. As required by section 227 (3) of the Act, we report that:

(a) We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

(c) The Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

(d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit & Loss and Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956;

(e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors as on March 31, 2013 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the Directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2013 from being appointed as a Director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.

Referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date

i. (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) As explained to us, major fixed assets have been physically verified by the management during the year. In our opinion, the frequency of physical verification is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such verification as compared to book records.

(c) There is no disposal of fixed assets during the year.

ii. The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory. As far as we could ascertain and according to the information and explanations given to us, no material discrepancies were noticed between the stock records and the financial records.

The Company is a NBFC and has not dealt with any goods and the Company does not hold any inventory except Inventory of Securities during the year under audit. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(ii) of the order, regarding physical verification of Inventory are not applicable to the Company.

iii. (a) The company has granted Loans & Advances to 4 parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Maximum amount involved during the year was Rs. 1,996.90 lacs and the year-end balance of loans given to such parties was Rs. 1621.19 lacs.

(b) In our opinion, the rate of interest wherever stipulated, and other terms and conditions for such loans are not, prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the company.

(c) The repayment of the principal amount of loan given and interest has been regular.

(d) There is no overdue amount in excess of rupees one lakh in respect of loans of the aforesaid parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(e) The Company had taken loan from 1 company covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The maximum amount involved during the year was Rs. 832.00 lacs and the year-end balance of loans taken from such parties was Rs. Nil.

(f) In our opinion, the rate of interest wherever stipulated, and other terms and conditions for such loans taken from companies listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act 1956 are not, prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the company.

(g) The repayment of the principal amount of loan taken and interest has been regular.

iv. In our opinion and according to the information and explanation given to us, there exists an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard to purchases of inventory, fixed assets and with regard to the sale of shares and services. During the course of our audit, we have neither come across nor have been informed of any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in the aforesaid internal control system of the Company.

v. (a) According to information and explanations given to us, we are of the opinion that the particulars of all contracts or arrangements that need to be entered into the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been so entered.

(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts or arrangements entered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 and exceeding the value of rupees five lakhs in respect of any party during the year have been made at prices which are reasonable having regard to prevailing market prices at the relevant time.

vi. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not accepted any deposits from the public and consequently, the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India, the provisions of Section 58A, 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the rules framed thereunder are not applicable to the Company.

vii. In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with the size and nature of its business and activities.

viii. According to information and explanation given to us, the Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost records under Section 209(1)(d) of the Companies Act, 1956 in respect of business carried out by the Company. Therefore, provisions of Clause 4(viii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

ix. (a) The Company has been generally regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Service Tax, Wealth Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and any other material statutory dues applicable to it.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty and Cess were in arrear as at 31st March 2013 for a period of more than six months from the date they become payable.

(c) According to the information and explanations given to us, except the dues given in table below, there are no dues of Sales Tax, Income Tax, Custom Duty, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Excise Duty and Cess, which have not been deposited on account of any dispute.

(Rs. in Lacs)

Nature of Amount Year Deposited Forum where dues under protest dispute is pending

Income Tax 23.77 1996-97 12.00 ITAT, New Delhi

Income Tax 23.15 2008-09 11.58 Commissioner Appeal, New Delhi

x. The company has accumulated losses of Rs.6,55,73,020 as at 31st March 2013 and has incurred cash loss of Rs. 12,06,63,899 during the financial year covered by our audit and no cash loss in the immediately preceding financial year.

xi. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to its Bankers. The Company did not have any outstanding debentures or any outstanding loans from any financial institution during the year.

xii. In our opinion and according to the information & explanation given to us, the Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

xiii. In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/ mutual benefit fund/ society. Therefore, the provisions of Clause 4(xiii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xiv. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of transactions for dealing in or trading in shares, securities and other investments and shares and other securities have been held by the company in its own name.

xv. As per the information and explanations given to us, the Company has given Corporate guarantees amounting Rs. 25 Cr for loans taken by SRS Limited from bank and Rs 30 Cr for loan taken by SRS Real Infrastructure Limited from bank and term and conditions whereof are not prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

xvi. To the best of our information and knowledge and as per records verified by us, the Company has not availed any term loan during the year. Therefore, the provisions of Clause 4(xvi) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xvii. According to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the Company, we report that no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term investment.

xviii. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not made preferential allotment of shares during the year. Therefore, the provisions of Clause 4(xviii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xix. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not issued any debentures. Therefore, the provisions of Clause 4(xix) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xx. The Company has not raised any money by means of public issue during the year. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xx) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xxi. According to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.



For Naresh Jai & Associates

Chartered Accountants

Firm Regn. No. 019082N





CA Naresh Goyal

(Partner)

Membership No. 501487

Place: Faridabad

Date: 27.05.2013


Mar 31, 2011

1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of SRS FINANCE LIMITED (''the Company'') as at 31st March 2011, the Profit and Loss Account and also the Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company''s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

3. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 [as amended by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004] [hereinafter referred to as ''Order''] issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 & 5 of the said Order.

4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 3 above, we report that:

(i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

(ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required bylaw have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

(iii) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

(iv) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit & Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956;

(v) On the basis of written representations received from the directors, as on 31st March 2011 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the Directors is disqualified as on 31st March 2011 from being appointed as a Director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;

(vi) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information required by Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India :

(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31st March, 2011;

(b) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the profit for the year ended on that date; and

(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date

i. (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) As explained to us, major fixed assets have been physically verified by the management during the year. In our opinion, the frequency of physical verification is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such verification as compared to book records.

(c) Fixed assets disposed off during the year were not substantial and therefore, do not affect the going concern assumption.

ii. (a) The inventory has been physically verified by the management during the year. In our opinion, the frequency of such verification is reasonable.

(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory. As far as we could ascertain and according to the information and explanations given to us, no material discrepancies were noticed between the physical stock and the book records.

iii. (a) As per the information and explanations provided to us, the Company has granted loan to 1 company covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act 1956. The maximum amount involved during the year was Rs. 2567 lacs and the year-end balance of loans given from such parties was Rs. 1761 lacs.

(b) In our opinion, the rate of interest wherever stipulated, and other terms and conditions for such loansare not prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the company.

(c) The repayment of the principal amount of loan given and interest has been regular.

(d) There is no overdue amount in excess of rupees one lakh in respect of loans of the aforesaid parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(e) The Company had taken loan from 2 companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The maximum amount involved during the year was Rs. 206 lacs and the year-end balance of loans taken from such parties was Rs. Nil.

(f) In our opinion, the rate of interest wherever stipulated, and other terms and conditions for such loans taken from companies listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act 1956 are not, prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the company.

(g) The repayment of the principal amount of loan taken and interest has been regular.

iv. In our opinion and according to the information and explanation given to us, there exists an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard to purchases of inventory, fixed assets and with regard to the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have neither come across nor have been informed of any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in the aforesaid internal control system of the Company.

v. (a) According to information and explanations given to us, we are of the opinion that the particulars of all contracts or arrangements that need to be entered into the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been so entered.

(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts or arrangements entered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 and exceeding the value of rupees five lakhs in respect of any party during the year have been made at prices which are reasonable having regard to prevailing market prices atthe relevanttime.

vi. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not accepted any deposits from the public and consequently, the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India, the provisions of Section 58A, 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the rules framed thereunder are not applicable to the Company.

vii. In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with the size and nature of its business and activities.

viii. According to information and explanation given to us, the Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost records under Section 209(1)(d) of the Companies Act, 1956 in respect of business carried out by the Company. Therefore, provisions of Clause 4(viii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

ix. (a) The Company has been generally regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Service Tax, Wealth Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and any other material statutory dues applicable to it.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty and Cess were in arrear as at 31st March 2011 for a period of more than six months from the date they become payable.

(c) According to the information and explanations given to us, except Income tax demand of Rs.

11.78 lacs for the financial year 1996-97, there are no dues of Sales Tax, Income Tax, Custom Duty, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Excise Duty and Cess, which have not been deposited on account of any dispute.

x. The company has no accumulated losses as at 31st March 2011 and has not incurred cash losses during the financial year covered by our audit and the immediately preceding financial year.

xi. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to its Bankers. The Company did not have any outstanding debentures or any outstanding loans from any financial institution during the year.

xii. In our opinion and according to the information & explanation given to us, the Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

xiii. In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/ mutual benefit fund/ society. Therefore, the provisions of Clause 4(xiii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xiv. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of transactions for dealing in or trading in shares, securities and other investments and shares and other securities have been held by the company in its own name.

xv. As per the information and explanations given to us, the Company has given Corporate guarantee for loans taken by SRS Real Infrastructure Limited from banks or financial institutions. In our opinion, terms and conditions of such guarantee given are not prime facie prejudicial to the interest of the company.

xvi. To the best of our information and knowledge and as per records verified by us, the Company has not availed any term loan during the year. Therefore, the provisions of Clause 4(xvi) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xvii. According to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the Company, we report that no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term investment.

xviii. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not made preferential allotment of shares during the year. Therefore, the provisions of Clause 4(xviii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xix. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not issued any debentures. Therefore, the provisions of Clause 4(xix) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xx. The Company has not raised any money by means of public issue during the year. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xx) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xxi. According to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.

For Naresh Jai & Associates

Chartered Accountants

Firm Regn. No. 019082N



CA Naresh Goyal

(Partner)

Membership No. 501487



Place : Faridabad

Date : 31.08.2011


Mar 31, 2010

1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of SRS FINANCE LIMITED (''the Company'') as at 31st March 2010, the Profit and Loss Account and also the Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company''s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

3. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 [as amended by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004] [hereinafter referred to as ''Order''] issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 & 5 of the said Order.

4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 3 above, we report that:

(i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

(ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

(iii) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

(iv) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit & Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211oftheCompaniesAct, 1956;

(v) On the basis of written representations received from the directors, as on 31st March 2010 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the Directors is disqualified as on 31st March 2010 from being appointed as a Director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;

(vi) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, they said accounts give the information required by Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31st March, 2010;

(b) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the profit for the year ended on that date; and

(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date

i. (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) As explained to us, major fixed assets have been physically verified by the management during the year. In our opinion, the frequency of physical verification is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such verification as compared to book records.

(c) Fixed assets disposed off during the year were not substantial and therefore, do not affect the going concern assumption.

ii. (a) The inventory has been physically verified by the management during the year. In our opinion, the frequency of such verification is reasonable.

(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size ofthe Company and the nature of its business.

(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory. As far as we could ascertain and according to the information and explanations given to us, no material discrepancies were noticed between the physical stock and the book records.

iii. (a) As per the information and explanations provided to us, the Company has granted loan to 2 companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act 1956. The maximum amount involved during the year was Rs. 244.86 lacs and the year-end balance of loans given from such parties was Rs. Nil.

(b) In our opinion, the rate of interest wherever stipulated, and other terms and conditions for such loans are not prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the company.

(c) The loan was fully recovered during the year by the company. Hence the provisions of clause 4

(iii) (c)& (d) of the order are not applicable to the company.

(e) The Company had taken loan from 3 companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The maximum amount involved during the year was Rs. 2321.72 lacs and the year-end balance of loans taken from such parties was Rs. 990.35 lacs.

(f) In our opinion, the rate of interest wherever stipulated, and other terms and conditions for such loans taken from companies listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act 1956 are not, prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the company.

(g) The repayment of the principal amount of loan taken and interest has been regular.

iv. In our opinion and according to the information and explanation given to us, there exists an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard to purchases of inventory, fixed assets and with regard to the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have neither come across nor have been informed of any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in the aforesaid internal control system of the Company.

v. (a) According to information and explanations given to us, we are of the opinion that the particulars of all contracts or arrangements that need to be entered into the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been so entered.

(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts or arrangements entered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 and exceeding the value of rupees five lakhs in respect of any party during the year have been made at prices which are reasonable having regard to prevailing market prices at the relevant time.

vi. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not accepted any deposits from the public and consequently, the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India, the provisions of Section 58A, 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the rules framed there under are not applicable to the Company.

vii. In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with the size and nature of its business and activities.

viii. According to information and explanation given to us, the Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost records under Section 209(1)(d) of the Companies Act, 1956 in respect of business carried out by the Company. Therefore, provisions of Clause 4(viii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

ix. (a) The Company has been generally regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Service Tax, Wealth Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and any other material statutory dues applicable to it, though there has been a slight delay in a few cases.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, except advance tax dues of Rs. 6.31 lacs, no other undisputed amounts payable in respect of Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty and Cess were in arrear as at 31st March 2010 for a period of more than six months from the date they become payable.

(c) According to the information and explanations given to us, except Income tax demand of Rs.

11.78 lacs for the financial year 1996-97, there are no dues of Sales Tax, Income Tax, Custom Duty, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Excise Duty and Cess, which have not been deposited on account of any dispute.

x. The company has no accumulated losses as at 31st March 2010 and has not incurred cash losses during the financial year covered by our audit and the immediately preceding financial year.

xi. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to its Bankers. The Company did not have any outstanding debentures or any outstanding loans from any financial institution during the year.

xii. In our opinion and according to the information & explanation given to us, the Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

xiii. In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/ mutual benefit fund/ society. Therefore, the provisions of Clause 4(xiii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xiv. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of transactions for dealing in or trading in shares, securities and other investments and shares and other securities have been held by the company in its own name.

xv. As per the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions.

xvi. To the best of our information and knowledge and as per records verified by us, the Company has not availed any term loan during the year. Therefore, the provisions of Clause 4(xvi) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xvii. According to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the Company, we report that no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term investment.

xviii. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has made preferential allotment of shares to parties and companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. In our opinion, the price, at which shares have been issued, is not prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

xix. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not issued any debentures. Therefore, the provisions of Clause 4(xix) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xx. The Company has not raised any money by means of public issue during the year. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xx) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xxi. According to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.

For Naresh Jai & Associates

Chartered Accountants

Firm Regn. No. 019082N

CA Naresh Goyal

(Partner)

Membership No. 501487

Place: Faridabad

Date: 12.08.2010


Mar 31, 2009

1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of SRS FINANCE LIMITED (''the Company'') as at 3lst March 2009, the Profit and Loss Account and also the Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company''s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

3. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 [as amended by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004] [hereinafter referred to as ''Order''] issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, l956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 & 5 of the said Order.

4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 3 above, we report that:

(i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

(ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

(iii) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

(iv) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit & Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 2ll of the Companies Act, l956;

(v) On the basis of written representations received from the directors, as on 3lst March 2009 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the Directors is disqualified as on 3lst March 2009 from being appointed as a Director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (l) of section 274 of the Companies Act, l956;

(vi) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, they said accounts give the information required by Companies Act, l956, in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 3lst March, 2009;

(b) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the profit for the year ended on that date; and

(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date

i. (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) As explained to us, major fixed assets have been physically verified by the management during the year. In our opinion, the frequency of physical verification is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such verification as compared to book records.

(c) Fixed assets disposed off during the year were not substantial and therefore, do not affect the going concern assumption.

ii. (a) The inventory has been physically verified by the management during the year. In our opinion, the frequency of such verification is reasonable.

(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory. As far as we could ascertain and according to the information and explanations given to us, no material discrepancies were noticed between the physical stock and the book records.

iii. (a) As per the information and explanations provided to us, the Company has granted loan to l0 companies covered in the register maintained under section 30l of the Companies Act l956. The maximum amount involved during the year was Rs. 3394 lacs and the year-end balance of loans taken from such parties was Rs. Nil.

(b) In our opinion, the rate of interest wherever stipulated, and other terms and conditions for such loans are not prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the company.

(c) The loan was fully recovered during the year by the company. Hence the provisions of clause 4 (iii) (c) & (d) of the order are not applicable to the company.

(e) The Company had taken loan from 9 companies covered in the register maintained under section 30l of the Companies Act, l956. The maximum amount involved during the year was Rs. 2994 lacs and the year-end balance of loans taken from such parties was Rs. Nil.

(f) In our opinion, the rate of interest wherever stipulated, and other terms and conditions for such loans have been taken from companies listed in the register maintained under section 30l of the Companies Act l956 are not, prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the company.

(g) The loan was fully repaid during the year by the company. Hence the provisions of clause 4 (iii) (g) of the order are not applicable to the company

iv. In our opinion and according to the information and explanation given to us, there exists an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard to purchases of inventory, fixed assets and with regard to the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have neither come across nor have been informed of any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in the aforesaid internal control system of the Company.

v. (a) According to information and explanations given to us, we are of the opinion that the particulars of all

contracts or arrangements that need to be entered into the register maintained under section 30l of the Companies Act, l956 have been so entered.

(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts or arrangements entered in the register maintained under section 30l of the Companies Act, l956 and exceeding the value of rupees five lakhs in respect of any party during the year have been made at prices which are reasonable having regard to prevailing market prices at the relevant time.

vi. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not accepted any deposits from the public and consequently, the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India, the provisions of Section 58A, 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, l956 and the rules framed there under are not applicable to the Company.

vii. In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with the size and nature of its business and activities.

viii. According to information and explanation given to us, the Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost records under Section 209(l)(d) of the Companies Act, l956 in respect of business carried out by the Company. Therefore, provisions of Clause 4(viii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

ix. (a) The Company has been generally regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Service Tax, Wealth Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty and Cess and any other material statutory dues applicable to it, though there has been a slight delay in a few cases.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, except advance tax dues of Rs. 4.52 lacs, no other undisputed amounts payable in respect of Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty and Cess were in arrear as at 3lst March 2009 for a period of more than six months from the date they become payable.

(c) According to the information and explanations given to us, there are no dues of Sales Tax, Income Tax, Custom Duty, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Excise Duty and Cess, which have not been deposited on account of any dispute.

x. The company has no accumulated losses as at 3lst March 2009 and has not incurred cash losses during the financial year covered by our audit and the immediately preceding financial year.

xi. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to its Bankers. The Company did not have any outstanding debentures or any outstanding loans from any financial institution during the year.

xii. In our opinion and according to the information & explanation given to us, the Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

xiii. In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/ mutual benefit fund/ society. Therefore, the provisions of Clause 4(xiii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xiv. According to the information and explanation given to us, the company has maintained proper record of transactions for dealing in or trading in shares, securities and other investments and shares and other securities have been held by the Company in its own name.

xv. As per the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions.

xvi. To the best of our information and knowledge and as per records verified by us, the Company has applied its term loans for the purpose for which the loans were obtained.

xvii. According to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the Company, we report that no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term investment.

xviii. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties and companies covered in the register maintained under section 30l of the Companies Act, l956.

xix. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not issued any debentures. Therefore, the provisions of Clause 4(xix) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xx. The Company has not raised any money by means of public issue during the year. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xx) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xxi. According to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.

For NARESH JAI & ASSOCAITES

Chartered Accountants



CA. NARESH GOYAL

(Partner)

Membership No. 50l487



Place: Faridabad

Date: 30.06.2009

Get Instant News Updates
Enable
x
Notification Settings X
Time Settings
Done
Clear Notification X
Do you want to clear all the notifications from your inbox?
Settings X