Home  »  Company  »  Supreme Petroche  »  Quotes  »  Auditor Report
Enter the first few characters of Company and click 'Go'

Auditor Report of Supreme Petrochem Ltd.

Mar 31, 2016

To the Members of Supreme Petrochem Limited

Report on the Standalone Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying standalone financial statements of Supreme Petrochem Limited which comprise the Balance sheet as at March 31, 2016, Statement of Profit and Loss, the Cash Flow Statement for the period then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

The Company''s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 (“the Act”) with respect to the preparation and presentation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding of the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditors’ Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these standalone financial statements based on our audit.

We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made there under.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant to the Company''s preparation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Company''s Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the standalone financial statements.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid standalone financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31, 2016, and its profit and its cash flows for the period ended on that date.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order,

2016 (“the Order”), issued by the Central Government of India in terms of section 143(11) of the Act, we give in the Annexure I a statement on the matters specified in paragraph 3 and 4 of the Order, to the extent applicable.

2. As required by Section 143 (3) of the Act, we report that:

(a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit.

(b) In our opinion, proper books of accounts as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books.

(c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of accounts.

(d) In our opinion, the aforesaid standalone financial statements comply with the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014.

(e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on March 31, 2016 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2016 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164(2) of the Act.

(f) With respect to the adequacy of the Internal Financial Controls over financial reporting of the Company and the operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to our separate report in Annexure II.

(g) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor''s Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i. The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position in its financial statements - Refer Note 29 to the financial statements.

ii. The Company has made provision, as required under the applicable law or accounting standards, for material foreseeable losses, if any, on long-term contracts including derivative contracts to the financial statements

iii. There has been no delay in transferring amounts, required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.

Annexure I referred to in paragraph 1 under “Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements” of our report of even date

(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) As informed to us, the fixed assets have been physically verified by the management during the period according to a phased programme. In our opinion, such programme is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. We have been further informed that no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification by the management between the book records and physical verification.

(c) According to the information and explanation given to us and on the basis of our examination of records of the Company, the title deeds of immovable properties classified as fixed assets are held in the name of the Company.

(ii) The inventory have been physically verified at reasonable intervals by the management during the period. The discrepancies noticed on physical verification, as compared to the book records, were not material and have been properly dealt with in the books of account.

(iii) The Company has not granted loans, secured or unsecured, to companies, firms, limited liability partnerships or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 189 of the Act. Hence, the question of reporting under sub clauses (a), (b) & (c) of the clause 3(iii) of the Order does not arise.

(iv) The Company has not granted any loans or under section 185, made any investment, provided any guarantee or security. Hence, the question of reporting under clause 3(iv) of the Order does not arise.

Sr.

No

Statutes

Nature of Dues

Period

Amount (Rs, in lacs)

Forum where dispute is pending

1

Central Excise Act, 1944

Excise duty demand

Apr-2001 - Aug-2014

426.20

CESTAT

Dec-2012 - Aug-2014

15.89

Commissioner

(Appeals)

Sep-2002 - Aug-2009

19.29

Commissioner

(Appeals)

Apr-2006 - Sep-2009

1.47

CESTAT

Oct-2009 - Jul-2010

1.04

CESTAT

Apr-2005 - Mar-2008

2.11

Commissioner

(Appeals)

Sep-2013 - Jun-2014

1.18

Commissioner

(Appeals)

Jul-2013

7.56

CESTAT

Dec-2013

1.79

2

Service Tax

Service Tax and penalty.

Apr-2004 - Jul-2007

44.21

(Finance Act 1994)

Apr-2005 - Sep-2009

14.92

Jan-2011 - Oct-2011

5.88

Sep-2004 - Aug-2013

452.45

CESTAT

Apr-2003 - Mar-2005

188.42

Apr-2011 - Mar-2013

222.57

Sep-2013 - May-2015

117.57

(v) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has complied with the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and the provisions of sections 73 to 76 or any other relevant provisions of the Act and the rules framed there under, to the extent applicable. We are informed by the Management that no order has been passed by the Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any court or any other Tribunal in this regard.

(vi) We have broadly reviewed accounts and records maintained by the Company pursuant to rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under Section 148(1) of the Act, in respect of Company''s products to which the said rules are made applicable and are of the opinion that, prima facie the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have, however, not made a detailed examination of records with a view to determine whether they are accurate.

(vii) (a) According to the information and explanations given

to us and according to the records of the Company examined by us, in our opinion, the Company is generally regular in depositing with the appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including Provident Fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Income-tax, Sales Tax, Service Tax, duty of Custom, duty of Excise, Value Added Tax, Cess and any other statutory dues, wherever applicable.

According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of aforesaid dues were outstanding as at March 31, 2016 for a period of more than 6 months from the date they became payable.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, the particulars of statutory dues that have not been deposited on account of disputes are as under:

(viii) We have been informed that the Company has not defaulted in repayment of loans or borrowings to financial institutions banks and Government. The Company has not raised any funds through debentures.

Sr.

No

Statutes

Nature of Dues

Period

Amount (Rs, in lacs)

Forum where dispute is pending

Sep-2011 - Jun-2014

1.51

Commissioner Office (SCN)

3

Central Excise Act, 1944

Excise duty demand

Mar-08

23.16

CESTAT

(Tamil Nadu)

Feb-2008 - Jun 2008

16.52

Jt. Commissioner of Central Excise

Apr-2009 - Dec-2009

3.35

Asst / Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise

Jan-2010 - Oct-2010

0.61

Superintendent of Central Excise

Nov-2010 - Oct-2011

0.16

Superintendent of Central Excise

4

Service Tax

Service Tax and penalty

Sep-2010 - Nov-2012

8.91

CESTAT

(Finance Act 1994)

Dec-2012 - Sep-2013

5.67

Commissioner

(Appeals)

Jan-2009 - Aug-2014

16.73

Superintendent / Asst./ Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise

5

Tamil Nadu VAT Act, 2006

VAT and penalty

2005 - 2006

0.88

Deputy Commissioner (Commercial tax)

2012-2013

1.20

Deputy Commissioner (Commercial tax)

2010-2011

7.43

Deputy Commissioner (Commercial tax)

2003-2004

2.61

Asst. Commissioner (Commercial tax)

6

Income Tax Act, 1961

Income Tax, interest and penalty

Assessment Year

2007-2008

44.43

2005-2006

30.96

Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)

2008-2009

121.26

2006-2007

4.71

ITAT Bombay

(ix) The Company has not raised money raised by way of initial public offer or further public offer (including debt instruments). According to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of the records examined by us, we state that the Company has prima facie applied the term loan for the purpose for which it was obtained.

(x) During the course of our examination of the books and records of the Company carried out in accordance with the generally accepted auditing practices in India and according to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the company has been noticed or reported during the period by the Company.

(xi) The managerial remuneration has been paid in accordance with the requisite approvals mandated by the provisions of section 197 read with Schedule V to the Act.

(xii) The Company is not a chit fund or a Nidhi company. Hence, the question of reporting under clause 3(xii) of the Order does not arise.

(xiii) The Company has complied with the provisions of sections 177 and 188 of the Act in respect of transactions with the related parties and the details have been disclosed in the Financial Statements etc., as required by the applicable accounting standards.

(xiv) The Company has not made any preferential allotment or private placement of shares or fully or partly convertible debentures during the period.

(xv) The Company has not entered into any non-cash transactions with directors or persons connected with him covered under the provisions of section 192 of the Act.

(xvi) The Company is not required to be registered under section 45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934.

Report on the Internal Financial Controls under Clause (i) of Sub-section 3 of Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 (“the Act”)

We have audited the internal financial controls over financial reporting of Supreme Petrochem Limited (“the Company”) as of March 31, 2016 in conjunction with our audit of the standalone financial statements of the Company for the period ended on that date.

Management’s Responsibility for Internal Financial Controls

The Company''s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal financial controls based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI). These responsibilities include the design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls that were operating effectively for ensuring the orderly and efficient conduct of its business, including adherence to company''s policies, the safeguarding of its assets, the prevention and detection of frauds and errors, the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, and the timely preparation of reliable financial information, as required under the Companies Act, 2013.

Auditors’ Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company''s internal financial controls over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting (the “Guidance Note”) and the Standards on Auditing, issued by ICAI and deemed to be prescribed under section 143(10) of the Companies Act, 2013, to the extent applicable to an audit of internal financial controls, both applicable to an audit of Internal Financial Controls and, both issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards and the Guidance Note require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether adequate internal financial controls over financial reporting was established and maintained and if such controls operated effectively in all material respects.

Our audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the adequacy of the internal financial controls system over financial reporting and their operating effectiveness. Our audit of internal financial controls over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal financial controls over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the Company''s internal financial controls system over financial reporting.

Meaning of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting

A Company''s internal financial control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company''s internal financial control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;

(2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company''s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Inherent Limitations of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting

Because of the inherent limitations of internal financial controls over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of the internal financial controls over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the internal financial control over financial reporting may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Opinion

In our opinion, the Company has, in all material respects, an adequate internal financial controls system over financial reporting and such internal financial controls over financial reporting were operating effectively as at March 31, 2016, based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.

For G. M. Kapadia & Co.

Chartered Accountants

Firm''s Registration No: 104767W

Rajen Ashar

Place : Mumbai Partner

Dated: April 20, 2016 Membership No: 048243


Jun 30, 2015

We have audited the accompanying standalone financial statements of Supreme Petrochem Limited ("the Company") which comprise the Balance sheet as at June 30, 2015, Statement of Profit and Loss, the Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management's Responsibility for the Financial Statements

The Company's Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act") with respect to the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding of the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditors' Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made thereunder.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant to the Company's preparation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on whether the Company has in place an adequate internal financial controls system over financial reporting and the operating effectiveness of such controls. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Company's Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the financial statements.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at June 30, 2015, and its profit and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2015 ("the Order"), issued by the Central Government of India in terms of section 143(11) of the Act, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraph 3 and 4 of the Order, to the extent applicable.

2. As required by Section 143 (3) of the Act, we report that:

(a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit.

(b) In our opinion, proper books of accounts as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books.

(c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of accounts.

(d) In our opinion, the aforesaid financial statements comply with the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 20.

(e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on June 30, 2015 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on June 30, 2015 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164(2) of the Act.

(f) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor's Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i. The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position in its financial statements - Refer Note 30 to the financial statements.

ii. The Company has made provision, as required under the applicable law or accounting standards, for material foreseeable losses, if any, on long-term contracts including derivative contracts to the financial statements.

iii. There has been no delay in transferring amounts, required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.

Annexure referred to in paragraph 1 under "Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements" of our report of even date

(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) As informed to us, the fixed assets have been physically verified by the management during the year according to a phased programme. In our opinion, such programme is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. We have been further informed that no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification by the management between the book records and physical verification.

(ii) (a) The inventory have been physically verified at reasonable intervals by the management during the year.

(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of such inventories followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business;

(c) In our opinion, and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of its inventory. No material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification between the physical stocks and the book records.

(iii) The Company has not granted loans, secured or unsecured, to Companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 189 of the Act. Hence, the question of reporting under sub clauses (a) & (b) of the clause 3(iii) of the Order does not arise.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has an adequate internal control procedure commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business, for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any major weakness in such internal control.

(v) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has complied with the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and the provisions of sections 73 to 76 or any other relevant provisions of the Act and the rules framed there under, to the extent applicable. We are informed by the Management that no order has been passed by the Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any court or any other Tribunal in this regard.

(vi) We have broadly reviewed accounts and records maintained by the Company pursuant to rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under Section 148 (1) of the Act, in respect of Company's products to which the said rules are made applicable and are of the opinion that, prima facie the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have, however, not made a detailed examination of records with a view to determine whether they are accurate.

(vii) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us and according to the records of the Company examined by us, in our opinion, the Company is generally regular in depositing with the appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including Provident Fund, Employees' State Insurance, Income- tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Value Added Tax, Cess and any other statutory dues, wherever applicable. According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of aforesaid dues were outstanding as at June 30, 2015 for a period of more than 6 months from the date they became payable.

(b) The particulars of statutory dues that have not been deposited on account of disputes are as under:

Sr. Statutes Nature of Dues Period No

1. Central Excise Act, Valuation in case of April 2001- 1944 Related Party Aug 2014

Valuation- Supplies Dec 2012 - Aug 2014

Valuation- Loading June 2000 - Charges Jan 2006

Duty Liability April 1996 - Jun 2000

Cenvat Credit Availed Sep 2002 - Aug 2009

April 2006 - Sep 2009

Oct 2009 - July 2010

June 2012

Nov 2012 - Aug 2012

July 2009

Sep 2013 - June 2014

Excise Duty on Short April 2005 - Receipts after Job March 2008 Work Rebate refund July-2013 Dec-2013

2 Service Tax Service Tax and penalty. April 2004 - (Finance Act Jul-2007 1994) April 2005 - Sep-2009

Jan 2011 - Oct-2011

Sep 2004 - Aug-2013

April 2003 - Mar-2005

April 2011 - Mar-2013

Sep 2013 - June-2014

Sep 2011 - June-2014

3 Central Excise Act, Availment of Cenvat March 2008 1944 (Tamil Nadu) Credit Feb 2008 - June 2008

April 2009- Dec 2009

Jan 2010- Oct 2010

Nov 2010 - Oct 2011

4 Service Tax Availment of Service Sep 2010 - (Finance Act 1994) tax credit & Penalty Nov 2012 (Tamil Nadu) Dec 2012 - Sep 2013

Jan 2009- Aug 2014

5 Tamil Nadu VAT Act, VAT and penalty. 2005-2006 2006 2012-2013

2010-2011

2003-2004

6 Income Tax Act, Income Tax, Assessment 1961 interest Year and penalty 2007- 2008

2005-2006

2006 - 2007

2008- 2009



Sr. Statutes Amount Forum where No (Rs. in lacs) dispute is pending

1. Central Excise Act, 403.40 CESTAT 1944

15.95 Commissioner (Appeals)

108.59 CESTAT

11.85 CESTAT

19.29 Commissioner (Appeals)

1.47 CESTAT

1.04 CESTAT

3.23 Commissioner (Appeals)

0.44 Commissioner (Appeals)

55.03 Commissioner

0.42 Office (SCN)

2.11

7.56 CESTAT

1.79

2 Service Tax 44.21 (Finance Act 1994) 14.92

5.88 CESTAT

452.45

188.42

296.77 Commissioner

105.24 Office (SCN)

3.63

3 Central Excise Act, 23.16 CESTAT 1944 (Tamil Nadu) 16.52 Jt. Commissioner of Central Excise

3.35 Asst/Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise

0.61 Superintendent of

0.16 Central Excise

4 Service Tax 8.91 CESTAT (Finance Act 1994) (Tamil Nadu) 5.67 Commissioner (Appeals)

13.87 Superintendent / Asst./ Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise

5 Tamil Nadu VAT Act, 0.88 Deputy Commissioner 2006 1.20 (Commercial tax)

7.43

2.61 Asst. Commissioner (Commercial tax)

6 Income Tax Act, 44.43 Commissioner 1961 of Income Tax (Appeal)

30.96

4.71 ITAT

121.26

(c) According to the information and explanations given to us and the records of the Company examined by us, in our opinion, there are no amounts payable to investor education and protection fund in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) and rules made thereunder.

(viii) The Company does not have any accumulated losses as at June 30, 2015. The Company has not incurred any cash losses in the financial year ended on that date or in the immediately preceding financial year.

(ix) We have been informed that the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to financial institutions and banks. The Company has not raised any funds through debentures.

(x) The Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions.

(xi) According to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of the records examined by us, we have to state that the Company has prima facie applied the term loan for the purpose for which it was obtained.

(xii) During the course of our examination of the books and records of the Company carried out in accordance with the generally accepted auditing practices in India and according to the information and explanations given to us, no material fraud (i.e. intentional material misstatements resulting from fraudulent financial reporting and misappropriation of assets) on or by the company has been noticed or reported during the year by the Company.

For G. M. Kapadia & Co. Chartered Accountants Firm's Registration No: 104767W

Rajen Ashar Place : Mumbai Partner Dated: July 21,2015 Membership No: 048243


Jun 30, 2014

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Supreme Petrochem Ltd which comprise the Balance sheet as at June 30, 2014, the Statement of Profit and Loss and the Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the Accounting Standards notified under the Companies Act, 1956 (the Act) read with General Circular 15/2013 dated September 13, 2013 of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs in respect of section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013. This responsibility includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditors'' Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Company''s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity''s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

1. in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at June 30, 2014;

2. in the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the profits for the year ended on that date; and

3. in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 as amended by the -Companies (Auditor''s Report) (Amendment) Order 2004 (the Order) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Act, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said order.

2. As required by section 227(3) of the Act, we report that:

(a) We have obtained all the information and explanations which, to the best of our knowledge and belief, were necessary for the purpose of our audit;

(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

(c) The Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account;

(d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the Accounting Standards notified under the Act read with the General Circular 15/2013 dated September 13, 2013 of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs in respect of section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013;

(e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors as on June 30, 2014 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on June 30, 2014 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Act.

ANNEXURE TO THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR''S REPORT

(Referred to in Paragraph 1 under "other legal and regulatory requirements" of our report of even date)

(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) As informed to us, the fixed assets have been physically verified by the management during the year according to a phased programme. In our opinion, such programme is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. We have been further informed that no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification by the management between the book records and physical verification.

(c) During the year, the Company has not disposed off any substantial part of fixed assets.

(ii) (a) The inventory have been physically verified at reasonable intervals by the management during the year.

(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of such inventories followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business;

(c) In our opinion, and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of its inventory. No material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification between the physical stocks and the book records.

(iii) The Company has not taken or granted loans, secured or unsecured, to companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Act. Hence, the question of reporting under sub clauses (a) to (g) of the clause 4(iii) of the Order does not arise.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has an adequate internal control procedure commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business, for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any major weakness in such internal control.

(v) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us, we are of the opinion that the transactions that need to be entered into the register in pursuance of Section 301 of the Act have been so entered.

(b) There are no transactions made in pursuance of contracts or arrangements and exceeding the value of Rs. 5 lakhs in respect of any party during the year

(vi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has complied with the provisions of Sections 58A and 58AA and other relevant provisions of the Act and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975, with regard to the deposits accepted by it from the public. As informed to us, no order has been passed by the Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any court or any Tribunal in this regard.

(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an adequate internal audit system commensurate with its size and nature of its business.

(viii) We have broadly reviewed accounts and records maintained by the Company pursuant to rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under Section 209(1) (d) of the Act, in respect of Company''s products to which the said rules are made applicable and are of the opinion that prima facie the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have, however, not made a detailed examination of records with a view to determine whether they are accurate.

(ix) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us and according to the records of the Company examined by us, in our opinion, the Company is generally regular in depositing with the appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Income-tax, Value Added Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and any other statutory dues, wherever applicable. According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of aforesaid dues were outstanding as at June 30, 2014 for a period of more than 6 months from the date they became payable.

(b) The particulars of statutory dues that have not been deposited on account of disputes are as under:

Sr. Statutes Nature of Dues Period

1 Central Excise duty and Apr-2001 to Mar-11 Excise penalty. Jul-2002 to Jan-2006 Act, Apr-08 to June-2008 1944 Apr-1996 to Jun-2000 Apr-06 to Sept-2009 Oct-09 to Jul-10 Apr-05 to Mar-08 March 2008 Sep-2002 to Aug-2009 Apr-11 to Nov-12 June 2013 & Dec 2013 . June 2012 Nov-12 to Aug-13 Dec-12 to Nov-13 June 2009 Feb 2008 to June 2008 Apr 2009 to Dec 2009 Jan 2010 to Oct 2011

2 Service Service Apr-2004 to Tax Tax and Jul-2007 (Finance penalty. Apr-2005 to Act Sep-2009 1994) Jan-2011 to 0ct-2011 Sep-2004 to Aug-2013 Sept 2010 to Nov 2012 Sept 2010 to Nov 2012 June 2009 to Feb 2010 Aug-2012 to May-2013 Apr-2011 to Dec-2011 of Mar 2012 to Mar 2013 Dec 2012 to Sept 2013 Jan 2011 to Sept 2013 Mar 2011 to Dec 2011 Feb 2012 to Nov 2012 Jan 2009 to Sept 2013

3 Tamil VAT and 2005 - 2006 Nadu penalty. 2010-2011 VAT Act, 2003-2004 2006 2012-2013

4 Income Income Assessment Year Tax Tax, inter- 2007-2008 Act, est and 2005-2006 1961 penalty. 2008-2009 2006-2007

Forum where Sr. Statutes Amount dispute is (Rs. lacs) pending.

1 Central 554.45 Remand Back Excise 222.19 to Comm. Ap- Act, 1100.00 peal. 1944 11.85 CESTAT 1.47 1.04 2.11 23.16 19.29 Commissioner 78.07 (Appeals) 408.53 3.23 0.44 21.91 28.59 16.52 Joint Commis- sioner 3.35 Assistant /Deputy Com- 0.77 missioner Superintendent

2 Service 44.21 CESTAT Tax (Finance 14.92 Act 14.92 1994) 5.88 470.08 0.68 4.56 3.84 81.35 Commissioner of Central Excise (SCN) 0.16 Commissioner Central Ex- 0.09 cise (Appeals)

5.67 3.45 Superintendent/ Assistant / 0.80 Deputy Commissioner 1.09 2.84

3 Tamil 0.88 Commissioner/ Nadu 5.57 Deputy VAT Act, 2.61 Commissioner 2006 1.20 (Appeals) Assistant Com- missioner Deputy Com- missioner

4 Income Commissioner Tax 44.43 of Act, 30.96 Income Tax 1961 121.26 (Appeal) 4.71 ITAT Bombay

(x) The Company does not have any accumulated losses as at June 30, 2014. The Company has not incurred any cash losses in the financial year ended on that date or in the immediately preceding financial year.

(xi) We have been informed that the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to financial institutions and banks. The Company has not raised any funds through debentures.

(xii) The Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

(xiii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/ mutual benefit fund / society. Therefore, the provisions of this clause are not applicable to the Company.

(xiv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company is not a dealer or trader in securities. The Company has invested surplus funds in marketable securities and mutual funds. According to the information and explanations given to us, proper records have been maintained of the transactions and contracts and timely entries have been made therein. The investments in marketable securities and mutual funds have been held by the Company in its own name.

(xv) The Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions.

(xvi) According to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of the records examined by us, we state that the Company has prima facie applied the term loan for the purpose for which it was obtained.

(xvii) On the basis of review of utilization of funds, which is based on overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, related information as made available to us and as represented to us by the management, funds raised on short-term basis have not been used for long- term investments.

(xviii) The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties and companies covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Act during the year. Hence, the question of reporting under clause 4(xviii) of the Order regarding whether the price at which shares have been issued is prejudicial to the interest of the Company does not arise.

(xix) The Company has not issued any debentures, hence the question of reporting under clause 4(xix) of the Order regarding creation of securities or charge does not arise.

(xx) The Company has not raised any monies by way of public issues during the year.

(xxi) As represented to us by the management and based on our examination of the books and records of the Company in accordance with the generally accepted auditing practices in India, we have neither come across any material fraud on or by the Company noticed or reported during the year nor we have been informed of any such case by the management that causes the financial statements to be materially misstated.

For G. M. Kapadia & Co. Chartered Accountants Firms Registration No. 104767W

Rajen Ashar Partner Membership No.048243 Place : Mumbai Date : July 18, 2014


Jun 30, 2013

Report on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of SUPREME PETROCHEM LIMITED ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at June 30, 2013 and the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement of the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act"). This responsibility includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditors'' Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Company''s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India :

a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at June 30, 2013.

b) in the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the profit for the year ended on that date; and

c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Reports on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirments

1. As required by the Companies (Auditors'' Report) Order, 2003 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Act, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.

2. As required by section 227 (3) of the Act, we report that:

a) We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;

b) In our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

c) The Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account;

d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement comply with the accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Act;

e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors as on June 30, 2013, and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on June 30, 2013, from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Act.

(Referred to in Paragraph 1 under the heading of "Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements" of our report of even date).

On the basis of the records produced to us for our verification/ perusal, such checks as we considered appropriate and in terms of information and explanations given to us on our enquiries, we state that:

1. (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) We are informed that the Company has verified part of fixed assets during the year as per its programme of physical verification of all fixed assets over a period of three years which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and nature of its fixed assets. No material discrepancies have been noticed on such verification.

(c) As per the information and explanations given to us, no substantial part of fixed assets has been disposed off during the year affecting the going concern status of the Company.

2. (a) The inventory has been physically verified during the year by the management. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is reasonable.

(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory. No material discrepancies were noted on verification between the physical stocks and the book records.

3. (a) The Company has not granted any loans to Companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(b) The Company has not taken any loans from Companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there are adequate internal control systems commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business for purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for sale of goods and services. Further, on the basis of our examination of the books and records of the Company, and according to the information and explanations given to us, we have neither come across nor have been informed of any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in the aforesaid internal control systems.

5. According to the information and explanations given to us, there were no contracts or arrangements the particulars of which need to be entered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

6. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has complied with the provisions of Sections 58A and 58AA and other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975, with regard to the deposits accepted by it from the public. As informed to us, no order has been passed by the Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any court or any Tribunal in this regard.

7. In our opinion, the Company has an adequate internal audit system commensurate with its size and nature of its business.

8. We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the Company in respect of products where, pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government of India, the maintenance of cost records has been prescribed under clause (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 209 of the Act, and are of the opinion that, prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have, however, not made a detailed examination of the records with a view to determine whether they are accurate or complete.

9. (a) According to the records of the Company, the Company has been generally regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues including Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax (VAT), Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues applicable to it, with the appropriate authorities and no such dues were in arrears, as at June 30,2013 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

10. The Company does not have accumulated losses at the end of the financial year and it has not incurred any cash losses in the financial year covered by our audit and in the immediately preceding financial year.

11. In our opinion and as perthe information and explanations given to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to financial institutions or banks. The Company has no borrowing through debentures.

12. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

13. In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/ mutual benefit fund/ society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4 (xiii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

14. In our opinion, the Company is not dealing in or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4 (xiv) of the Order, are not applicable to the Company. There are no investments held by the Company at the end of the year.

15. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not given guarantees for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions.

16. Based on information and explanations given to us by the management, the term loans were applied for the purpose for which they were raised.

17. According to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the Company, no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term investment.

18. The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties and companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 during the year.

19. The Company did not have outstanding debentures during the year and accordingly, the creation of securities thereof does not arise.

20. The Company has not raised any money by public issue during the year.

21. During the course of our examination of the books and records of the Company carried out in accordance with the generally accepted auditing practices in India, and according to the information and explanations given to us, we have neither come across any instances of material fraud on or by the Company, noticed or reported during the year, nor have we been informed of such case by the management.

For PARIKH & SHAH

Chartered Accountants

Firm Registration Number 107528W

D. B. MOHINI

Partner

Membership No.5681

Place : Mumbai

Date : July 17,2013


Jun 30, 2012

We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of SUPREME PETROCHEM LIMITED as at June 30, 2012 and also the annexed Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement of the Company for the year ended on that date. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our Audit.

(1) We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatements. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

(2) As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 as amended by the Companies (Auditor's Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004 (together the Order) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of Section 227 (4A) of the Companies Act, 1956, we annex hereto a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.

(3) (a) Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph (2) above, we report that we have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

(b) In our opinion, proper books of accounts as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of the books of the Company;

(c) The Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of accounts of the Company;

(d) In our opinion, the Balance sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow statement dealt with by this report, comply with the Accounting Standards referred to in Section 211 (3C) of the Companies Act, 1956.

(e) On the basis of the written representations received from the Directors, as on June 30, 2012, and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on June 30, 2012 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(f) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said accounts, read together with the notes thereon, give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India :

i) In the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at June 30, 2012;

ii) In the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the profit for the year ended on that date; and

iii) In the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

ANNEXURE TO AUDITORS' REPORT

Statement referred to in Paragraph 2 of the Auditors' Report of even date to the Members of SUPREME PETROCHEM LIMITED on the Accounts for the year ended June 30, 2012.

On the basis of the records produced to us for our verification/ perusal, such checks as we considered appropriate and in terms of information and explanations given to us on our enquiries, we state that :

1. (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) We are informed that the Company has verified part of fixed assets during the year as per its programme of physical verification of all fixed assets over a period of three years which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and nature of its fixed assets. No material discrepancies have been noticed on such verification.

(c) As per the information and explanations given to us, no substantial part of fixed assets has been disposed off during the year affecting the going concern status of the Company.

2. (a) The inventory has been physically verified during the year by the management. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is reasonable.

(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory. No material discrepancies were noted on verification between the physical stocks and the book records.

3. (a) The Company has not granted any loans to Companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(b) The Company has not taken any loans from Companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there are adequate internal control systems commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business for purchase of inventory, fixed assets and for sale of goods and services. Further, on the basis of our examination of the books and records of the Company, and according to the information and explanations given to us, we have neither come across nor have been informed of any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in the aforesaid internal control systems.

5. According to the information and explanations given to us, there were no contracts or arrangements the particulars of which need to be entered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

6. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has complied with the provisions of Sections 58A and 58AA and other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975, with regard to the deposits accepted by it from the public. As informed to us, no order has been passed by the Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any court or any Tribunal in this regard.

7. In our opinion, the Company has an adequate internal audit system commensurate with its size and nature of its business.

8. We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the Company in respect of products where, pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government of India, the maintenance of cost records has been prescribed under clause (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 209 of the Act, and are of the opinion that, prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have not, however, made a detailed examination of the records with a view to determine whether they are accurate or complete.

9. (a) According to the records of the Company, the Company has been regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues including Provident fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees' State Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues applicable to it, with the appropriate authorities and no such dues were in arrears, as at June 30, 2012 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, the statutory dues as at June 30, 2012 which have not been deposited on account of any dispute are as under :-

Sr. Statutes Nature Period No. of Dues

1 Central Excise September, Excise duty and 2002 to Act, penalty. March, 2011 1944 July, 2011 April, 1996 to June, 2000 April, 2001 to July 2010

2 Service Service April, 2003 to Tax Tax and March, 2005 (Finance penalty. February, Act 2009 to 1994) January, 2011 April, 2004 to August, 2010

3 Tamil VAT and 2005 - 2006 Nadu penalty. VAT Act, 2006

4 Income Income Assessment Tax Tax and Year Act, interest 2006 - 2007 1961 and 2009 - 2010 2005 - 2006 1998 - 1999

Statutes Amount Forum where (Rs.in dispute is Lacs) pending

Central Excise 89.05 Commissioner of Central Excise Act,1944

38.63 (Appeals)

11.85 CESTAT

1866.05 CESTAT

Service Tax (Finance Act 1994) 143.53 Commissioner of Central Excise

2.51 (Appeals)

76.44 CESTAT

Tamil Nadu VAT Act, 0.88 Commissioner/ Dy.Commissioner 2006 (Appeals)

Income Tax Act,1961 Commissioner of Income Tax 20.02 (Appeal)

56.64 ITAT Bombay

192.90 High Court of Bombay

10. The Company does not have accumulated losses at the end of the financial year and it has not incurred any cash losses in the financial year covered by our audit and in the immediately preceding financial year.

11. In our opinion and as per the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to financial institutions and banks as at the date of Balance Sheet. The Company has no borrowing through debentures.

12. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

13. In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/ mutual benefit fund/ society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4 (xiii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

14. In our opinion, the Company is not dealing in or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4 (xiv) of the Order, are not applicable to the Company. There are no investments held by the Company at the end of the year.

15. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not given guarantees for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions.

16. Based on information and explanations given to us by the management, the term loans were applied for the purpose for which they were raised.

17. According to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the Company, no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term investment.

18. The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to companies or parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 during the year.

19. The Company did not have outstanding debentures during the year and accordingly, the creation of securities thereof does not arise.

20. The Company has not raised any money by public issue during the year.

21. During the course of our examination of the books and records of the Company carried out in accordance with the generally accepted auditing practices in India, and according to the information and explanations given to us, we have neither come across any instances of material fraud on or by the Company, noticed or reported during the year, nor have we been informed of such case by the management.

For PARIKH & SHAH

Chartered Accountants

Firm Registration Number 107528W

D. B. MOHINI

Partner

Membership No.5681

Mumbai

Date : July 18, 2012


Jun 30, 2011

We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of SUPREME PETROCHEM LIMITED as at June 30, 2011 and also the annexed Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement of the Company for the year ended on that date. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our Audit.

(1) We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatements. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

(2) As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 as amended by the Companies (Auditor's Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004 (together the Order) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of Section 227 (4A) of the Companies Act, 1956, we annex hereto a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.

(3) (a) Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph (2) above, we report that we have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

(b) In our opinion, proper books of accounts as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of the books of the Company;

(c) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of accounts of the Company;

(d) In our opinion, the Balance sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow statement dealt with by this report, comply with the Accounting Standards referred to in Section 211 (3C) of the Companies Act, 1956.

(e) On the basis of the written representations received from the Directors, as on June 30, 2011, and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on June 30, 2011 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(f) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said accounts, read together with the notes thereon, give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India :

i) In the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at June 30, 2011;

ii) In the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the profit for the year ended on that date; and

iii) In the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

ANNEXURE TO AUDITORS' REPORT

Statement referred to in Paragraph 2 of the Auditors' Report of even date to the Members of SUPREME PETROCHEM LIMITED on the Accounts for the year ended June 30, 2011.

On the basis of the records produced to us for our verification/ perusal, such checks as we considered appropriate and in terms of information and explanations given to us on our enquiries, we state that :

1. (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) We are informed that the Company has verified part of fixed assets during the year as per its programme of physical verification of all fixed assets over a period of three years which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and nature of its fixed assets. No material discrepancies have been noticed on such verification.

(c) As per the information and explanations given to us, no substantial part of fixed assets has been disposed off during the year affecting the going concern status of the Company.

2. (a) The inventory has been physically verified during the year by the management. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is reasonable.

(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory. No material discrepancies were noted on verification between the physical stocks and the book records.

3. (a) The Company has not granted any loans to Companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(b) The Company has not taken any loans from Companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there are adequate internal control systems commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business for purchase of inventory, fixed assets and for sale of goods and services. Further, on the basis of our examination of the books and records of the Company, and according to the information and explanations given to us, we have neither come across nor have been informed of any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in the aforesaid internal control systems.

5. According to the information and explanations given to us, there were no contracts or arrangements the particulars of which need to be entered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

6. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has complied with the provisions of Sections 58A and 58AA and other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975, with regard to the deposits accepted by it from the public. As informed to us, no order has been passed by the Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any court or any Tribunal in this regard.

7. In our opinion, the Company has an adequate internal audit system commensurate with its size and nature of its business.

8. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost records under section 209(1)

(d) of the Companies Act, 1956 for the products of the Company.

9. (a) According to the records of the Company, the Company has been regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues including Provident fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees' State Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues applicable to it, with the appropriate authorities and no such dues were in arrears, as at June 30, 2011 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, the statutory dues as at June 30, 2011 which have not been deposited on account of any dispute are as under :

Sr. Statutes Nature of Fiscal Amount Forum where

No Dues Year (Rs.in dispute

lacs) ispending.

1 Bombay Sales Tax on 2000 - 01 96.07 Maharashtra Sales Tax Consignment Sales Tax stock transfer Tribunal

2 Tamilnadu Form 'C' & 2003 - 04 3.49 Commission- Commercial Form 'F' on erate Tax Free trade (Chennai) samples

3 Central a] Valuation in Apr'01 – 540.13 CESTAT/ Excise case of related Sept'10 Commission- party including erate Appeal penalty :

b] Valuation July '02 – 227.20 CESTAT - Supplies Jan'06 against invali- dation letters including penalty

c] Valua- April '96 – 32.90 CESTAT/ tion – Load- Oct '10 Commission- ing charges erate Appeal incurred by Transporter

d] Refund of April '08- 1100.00 CESTAT Cenvat credit June '08 on inputs used in export.

e] Cenvat Oct '09 – 1.03 Commission- credit availed July '10 erate Appeal on Hose As- sembly etc.

f] Excise April 1.05 Commission- duty on short '05 to erate Appeal receipts after March'08 Job work.

g] Availment of 2007 – 08 23.16 CESTAT cenvat credit on Product Screen Sepa- rator including penalty.

h] Transfer of 2008 – 09 49.62 Commission- Cenvat credit erate Appeal on inputs from SPL Polymers including penalty.

i] Availment of 2008 – 09 1.87 Commission- Cenvat credit erate Appeal on MS Plates etc. including penalty.

j] Availment of 2009 - 10 4.80 Commission- suo-moto cred- erate Appeal it on inputs recovered from fire accident including penalty.

k] Utilisation 2007 - 08 0.80 Commission- of education erate Appeal cess including penalty

l] Incorrect 2008 - 09 20.92 Commission- passing of erate Appeal credit on Sty- rene Monomer including penalty.

4 Service Tax, i] Service Tax Apr '03 - 194.98 CESTAT/ 1994 Credit Eligibil- Aug '10 Commission- ity including erate (Appeal) penalty.

ii] Service Apr '05 - 16.70 Commission- Tax Credit on Aug. '10 erate (Appeal) inward CHA/ Services.

5 Income Tax Disallowance 2008 - 47.00 Commissioner u/s. 14A and 2009 of Income Tax of Unabsorbed (Appeals) Depreciation

10. The Company does not have accumulated losses at the end of the financial year and it has not incurred any cash losses in the financial year covered by our audit and in the immediately preceding financial year.

11. In our opinion and as per the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to financial institutions and banks as at the date of Balance Sheet. The Company has no borrowing through debentures.

12. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

13. In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/ mutual benefit fund/ society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4 (xiii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

14. In our opinion, the Company is not dealing in or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments.

Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4 (xiv) of the Order, are not applicable to the Company. All the shares held as investments at the close of the year are held in the name of the Company.

15. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not given guarantees for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions.

16. Based on information and explanations given to us by the management, the term loans were applied for the purpose for which they were raised.

17. According to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the Company, no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term investment.

18. The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to companies or parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 during the year.

19. The Company did not have outstanding debentures during the year and accordingly, the creation of securities thereof does not arise.

20. The Company has not raised any money by public issue during the year.

21. During the course of our examination of the books and records of the Company carried out in accordance with the generally accepted auditing practices in India, and according to the information and explanations given to us, we have neither come across any instances of material fraud on or by the Company, noticed or reported during the year, nor have we been informed of such case by the management.

For PARIKH & SHAH

Chartered Accountants

Firm Registration Number 107528W

D. B. MOHINI

Partner

Membership No.5681

Mumbai

Date : July 18, 2011


Jun 30, 2010

We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of SUPREME PETROCHEM LIMITED as at June 30, 2010 and also the annexed Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement of the Company for the year ended on that date. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our Audit.

(1) We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatements. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

(2) As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 as amended by the Companies (Auditors Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004 (together the Order) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of Section 227 (4A) of the Companies Act, 1956, we annex hereto a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.

(3) (a) Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to

in paragraph (2) above, we report that we have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

(b) In our opinion, proper books of accounts as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of the books of the Company;

(c) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of accounts of the Company;

(d) In our opinion, the Balance sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow statement dealt with by this report, comply with the Accounting Standards referred to in Section 211 (3C) of the Companies Act, 1956.

(e) On the basis of the written representations received from the Directors, as on June 30, 2010, and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on June 30, 2010 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(f) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said accounts, read together with the notes thereon, give

the information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India :

i) In the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at June 30, 2010;

ii) In the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the profit for the year ended on that date; and

iii) In the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date. ANNEXURE TO AUDITORS REPORT Statement referred to in Paragraph 2 of the Auditors Report of even date to the Members of SUPREME PETROCHEM LIMITED on the Accounts for the year ended June 30,2010.

On the basis of the records produced to us for our verification/ perusal, such checks as we considered appropriate and in terms of information and explanations given to us on our enquiries, we state that:

1. (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) We are informed that the Company has verified part of fixed assets during the year as per its programme of physical verification of all fixed assets over a period of three years which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and nature of its fixed assets. No material discrepancies have been noticed on such verification.

(c) As per the information and explanations given to us, no substantial part of fixed assets has been disposed off during the year affecting the going concern status of the Company.

2. (a) The inventory has been physically verified during the year by the management. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is reasonable.

(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory. No material discrepancies were noted on verification between the physical stocks and the book records.

3. (a) The Company has not granted any loans to Companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(b) The Company has not taken any loans from Companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there are adequate internal control systems commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business for purchase of inventory, fixed assets and for sale of goods and services. Further, on the basis of our examination of the books and records of the Company, and according to the information and explanations given to us, we have neither come across nor have been informed of any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in the aforesaid internal control systems.

5. According to the information and explanations given to us, there were no contracts or arrangements the particulars of which need to be entered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

6. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has complied with the provisions of Sections 58A and 58AA and other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975, with regard to the deposits accepted by it from the public. As informed to us, no order has been passed by the Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any court or any Tribunal in this regard.

7. In our opinion, the Company has an adequate internal audit system commensurate with its size and nature of its business.

8. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost records under section 209(1 )(d) of the Companies Act, 1956 for the products of the Company.

9. (a) According to the records of the Company, the

Company has been regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues including Provident fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees State Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues applicable to it, with the appropriate authorities and no such dues were in arrears, as at June 30,2010 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, the statutory dues as at June 30, 2010 which have not been deposited on account of any dispute are as under :-

Sr. Statutes Nature of Fiscal Year No. Dues

1 Bombay Sates Tax on 2000-01 Sales Tax Consignment stock transfer

2 Tamilnadu Sales Tax on 2005-06 Commercial Free Trade Tax Samples 3 Central a] Valuation in Excise case of related party including: i. penalty of Apr"01 -

Rs.209.97 Lacs Dec07 ii. penalty of Jan08 - Rs. 20 Lacs. Sep08

iii. penalty of Oct08 - X 5 Lacs Jun09 b]Supplies Jul02 - against Jan06 invalidation letters.

c] Loading Apr96 - Charges Jun00 incurred by transporter.

d] Refund of Apr"08 - Cenvat Credit Jun08 on inputs used in export. e] Disallowance Mar08 - of Cenvat Jun09 Credit.

4 Service a) Disallowance Apr03- Tax, 1994 of Cenvat Jul07 Credit on Service Tax Inputs. b) Disallowance Feb08- of Cenvat Jul09 Credit on Service Tax Inputs.

Statutes Amount Forum where (Rs. Lacs) dispute is pending.

Bombay Sales Tax 96.07 Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal

Tamilnadu Commercial Tax 0.88 Dy. Commr. (Appeal)

Central Excise 455.86 CESTAT

53.92 Commissioner (Appeal)

19.27 Appeal being preferred

227.19 CESTAT

11.85 CESTAT

1100.00 Commissioner (Appeal)

72.44 Commissioner (Appeal)

Service Tax, 1994 187.75 Commissioner (Appeal)

5.95 Commissioner (Appeal)

10. The Company does not have accumulated losses at the end of the financial year and it has not incurred any cash losses in the financial year covered by our audit and in the immediately preceding financial year.

11. In our opinion and as per the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to financial institutions and banks as at the date of Balance Sheet. The Company has no borrowing through debentures.

12. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

13. In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/ mutual benefit fund/ society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4 (xiii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

14. In our opinion, the Company is not dealing in or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4 (xiv) of the Order, are not applicable to the Company. All the shares held as investments at the close of the year are held in the name of the Company.

15. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not given guarantees for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions.

16. Based on information and explanations given to us by the management, the term loans were applied for the purpose for which they were raised.

17. According to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the Company, no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term investment.

18. The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to companies or parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 during the year.

19. The Company did not have outstanding debentures during the year and accordingly, the creation of securities thereof does not arise.

20. The Company has not raised any money by public issue during the year.

21. During the course of our examination of the books and records of the Company carried out in accordance with the generally accepted auditing practices in India, and according to the information and explanations given to us, we have neither come across any instances of material fraud on or by the Company, noticed or reported during the year, nor have we been informed of such case by the management.

For PARIKH & SHAH Chartered Accountants Firm Registration Number 107528W

D.B. MOHINI

Partner

Membership No.5681 Mumbai

Date: July 20, 2010