Mar 31, 2012
1.1 Terms/rights attached to shares
The company has one class of equity shares having a par value of Rs.
10/- each. Each shareholder is eligible for one vote per share held, in
the event of liquidation the equity share holders are eligible to
receive remaining assets of the company after distribution of all
preferential amount in proportion to their shareholding.
2. Contingent liability not provided for in respects of disputed Income
Tax demand for the Assessment Year 1991-92 and 1997-98 which the
Department has preferred an appeal with the Tribunal/High Court
Rs.4565969 (P.Y. Rs. 4565969). Rs.5,16,523/- has been deposited for the
assessment year 1991-92 against the appeal filed for the said
assessment year with Income-tax Tribunal and it has been shown under
the head Advance Income- tax. and TDS
The related party information is as identified by the management based
on the information available and relied upon by the auditors.
3. The company has given an undertaking to vacuous Financial
Institutions not to transfer, assign, pledge, hypothecate or otherwise
dispose off in any manners its investments in equity shares in LML
Limited without prior approval of the Institutions so long as the
advances to LML Limited by Institutions remain outstanding.
4. Pursuant to amendments in RBI Act, 1934, the Company had applied
for registration under the new scheme with RBI. In response to the
application. RBI has vide letter No.DNBS (MRO).No.4223/02.04
Regn./97-98 dated April 24, 1998, precluded the
company from accepting or renewing any fresh public deposits. The NOF
as on March 31, 2012 is more than the minimum stipulated limit of Rs.
25 lakhs. Pending any further communication from RBI, the Company
continues to carry on its existing business activities and it has not
accepted any public deposits.
5. The outstanding balances as at March 31, 2012 in respect of some
of the Payables. Loans and Advances are subject to confirmation from
the respective parties and consequential reconciliation / adjustments
arising there from, if any. The management, however, does not expect
any material variation.
6. In the opinion of the Board, the value of realization of Current
Assets, Loans & Advances in the ordinary course of business would not
be less than the amount at which they are stated in the Balance Sheet
and the provision for known and determined liabilities is adequate and
not in excess if amount reasonably required.
7. In view of time limitations on carry forward losses and as a
matter of prudence deferred tax assets arising on account of brought
forward losses/unabsorbed depreciation under tax laws and provision for
diminution in the value of long term investments has not been
recognized,
8. The company operates only in one segment i.e. Investment & Finance
Activities and therefore no separate segment wise detail is given as
required by Accounting Standard -
9. ''Segment Reporting'' issued by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India.
10. Additional information pursuant to Part II of Schedule VI of the
Companies Act, 1956 are not applicable to the company.
11. There are no dues to Micro and Small Enterprises. This information
as required to be disclosed under the Micro. Small and Medium
Enterprises Development Act, 2006 has been determined to the extent
such parties have been identified on the basis of information available
with the Company.
12. For the year ended March 31, 2012 the Revised Schedule VI notified
under the Companies Act 1956 has become appraisable for preparation and
presentation of financial statements. The preparation of financial
statements based on the Revised Schedule VI does not impact the
recognition and measurement principles followed for preparation of the
financial statements. However it has significant impact on the
presentation and disclosures made in the financial statements. However,
it has required / reclassified (he previous year figure in accordance
with the requirement applicable in the current year.
Mar 31, 2010
1. Contingent liability not provided for in respect of disputed Income
Tax demand for the Assessment Year 1991-92 and 1997-98 which the
Department has preferred an appeal with the Tribunal/High Court
Rs.45,65,969 (Previous Year Rs. 45,65,969)
2. Rs.5,16,523/- has been deposited for the assessment year 1991-92
against the appeal filed for the said assessment year with Income-tax
Tribunal and it has been shown under the head Advance Income-tax and
TDS.
3. The company has given an undertaking to various Financial
Institutions not to transfer, assign, pledge, hypothecate or otherwise
dispose off in any manners its investments in equity shares in LML
Limited without prior approval of the Institutions so long as the
loans, advances to LML Limited by Institutions remain outstanding.
4. Pursuant to amendments in RBI Act, 1934, the company had applied
for registration under the new scheme with RBI. In response to the
application, RBI has vide letter No.DNBS
(MRO).No.4223/02.04.Regn./97-98 dated April 24, 1998, precluded the
company from accepting or renewing any fresh public deposits. The NOP
as on March 31. 2010 is more than the minimum stipulated limit of Rs.
25/- lakhs. Pending any further communication from RBI. the Company
continues to carry on its existing business activities and it has not
accepted any public deposits.
5. The outstanding balances as at March 31, 2010 in respect of some of
the Creditors, Loans and Advances and certain bank accounts are subject
to confirmation from the respective parties and consequential
reconciliation / adjustments arising there from, if any. The
management, however, does not expect any material variation.
6. In the opinion of the Board, the value of realization of Current
Assets, Loans & Advances in the ordinary course of business would not
be less than the amount a( which they are stated in the Balance Sheet
and the provision for known and determined liabilities is adequate and
not in excess if amount reasonably required.
7. There are no dues to Micro and Small Enterprises. This information
as required to be disclosed under the Micro, Small and Medium
Enterprises Development Act, 2006 has been determined to the extent
such parties have been identified on the basis of information available
with the Company.
8. In view of time limitations on carry forward losses and as a matter
of prudence deferred tax assets arising on account of brought forward
losses/unabsorbed depreciation under tax laws and provision for
diminution in the value of long term investments has not been
recognized.
9 Disclosure requirements as per Accounting Standard (AS-18) on
"Related Party Disclosure" issued by die Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India.
(i) List of Related Parties and Relationships.
S.No Name of the Related Party Relationship
1. Acme Investments Ltd. } Associate
2. Mimosa Finance P. Trading Ltd. } Companies
3. Ragini Singhania } Major Shareholders
} of the company
4. Shardha Singhania } able lo exercise
} significant influence.
5. Gayatri Singhania } Relatives of major
6. A.K. Singhania } Shareholders of the
7. Deepak Singhania } Company.
8. Anurag Singhania }
9. Dhan Sharda Merchantile (P) Ltd. } Companies over which
} relatives major
10. Iid Hitech Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. } shareholders of
} the SITC
11. Ginideep Finance & Investments } able to exercise
(P) Ltd. } significant influx
12. Bina Fin ivest Pvt. Ltd, }
13. Rasoi Trading" & Agencies Pvt. Ltd.}
14. Inlac Trading &, Agencies Pvt. Ltd.}
15. Preyasa Finance & Investment Pvt. }
Ltd.
16. Archil Finance & Trading Ltd. }
17. Payal Investment & Trading
Pvt. Limited } Subsidiaries
18. Mahalaxmi Holding Limited
10 The company operates only in one segment i.e. Investment & Finance
Activities and therefore no separate segment wise detail is given as
required by Accounting Standard - 17 'Segment Reporting' issued by the
Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.
11 The Previous year's figures have been, regrouped, rearranged and
reclassified wherever necessary.
12 Additional information pursuant to provisions of paragraph 3, 4C
and 4D oPPart II of Schedule VI to the Companies Act, are not
applicable to the Company.