Mar 31, 2013
Report on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of U G HOTELS AND
RESORTS LIMITED ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at
March 31, 2013, and the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow
statement for the year then ended, and a summary of significant
accounting policies and other explanatory information. Management''s
Responsibility for the Financial Statements Management is responsible
for the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and
fair view of the financial position, financial performance and Cash
Flows of the Company in accordance with the Accounting Standards
referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act,
1956 ("the Act"). This responsibility includes the design,
implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the
preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a
true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due
to fraud or error.
Auditor''s Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance
with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with
ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
from material misstatements. An audit involves performing procedures
to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. The procedures selected depend on our judgment,
including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the
financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those
risk assessments, we consider internal control relevant to the
Company''s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements
in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of
accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
presentation of the financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and
appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion. Opinion
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the
explanations given to us, the said accounts due to Note 6(A) of
regarding dispute & compromise with UMAK Investment Company Private
Limited & Note 13 of regarding non provision of doubtful debts for Rs.
48,20 lacs, give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956,
in the manner so required but don''t give a true and fair view in
conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India,
in view of the dispute and compromise with UMAK Investment Company
Private Limited is still pending at various levels:
a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at March 31, 2013;
b) in the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the Loss for the
year ended on that date; and
c) In the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the
year ended on that date.
Report on Other legal and Regulatory Requirements 1. As required by the
Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 ("the Order") issued by the
Central Government of India in terms of sub- section (4A) of section
227 of the Act, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters
specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.
2. As required by section 227(3) of the Act, we report that:
a) we have obtained all the information and explanations which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit;
b) in our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been
kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those
books;
c) the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of
account.
d) in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, statement of Profit and Loss, and
Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards referred to in
subsection (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956;
e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors,
as at March 31, 2013 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we
report that none of the directors other than Harmit Ghai are
disqualified as at March 31, 2013 from being appointed as a director in
terms of Section 274 (1) (g) of the Act;
Annexure to the Auditors'' Report of even date to the members of U G
HOTELS AND RESORTS LIMITED, on the financial statements for the year
ended March 31, 2013 (Refer to in paragraph 5(1) of our report of even
date)
Based on the Audit Procedures performed for the purpose of reporting a
true and fair view on the financials statements of the company and
taking into the consideration the information and explanation given to
us and the books of accounts and other records examined by us in the
normal course of audit, we report that: i) In respect of Fixed Assets
of the Company and in our opinion:
a. The Company has not maintained proper Fixed Assets records.
b. The Company has a programme of physical verification of its fixed
assets by which they are verified annually. In accordance with this
programme, fixed assets were verified during the year and no
discrepancies were noticed on such verification. In our opinion, the
frequency of the physical verification is reasonable having regards to
the size of the company and nature of fixed assets.
c. The Company has not disposed any fixed assets during the year. ii)
In respect of Inventories of the Company and in our opinion:
a. Inventories have been physically verified by management during the
year and the frequency of verification is reasonable.
b. The procedures for physical verification of inventory followed by
the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of
the Company and the nature of its business.
c. The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory. No
material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification of
inventory.
iii) In respect of loans, secured or unsecured, granted to or taken
from companies, firms or other parties covered in the register
maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, in our opinion: a.
The Company has granted unsecured interest free/interest- bearing loans
to its subsidiaries which are listed in the register maintained under
Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The terms and conditions of
such loans are prima facie, not prejudicial to the interest of the
Company.
b. The Company has taken loans from two parties covered in the
register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The
maximum amount outstanding at any time during the year aggregated to
Rs. 79, 61,928 and the balance outstanding at year end is Rs.79,61,928.
c. In our opinion rate of interest, where ever stipulated and other
terms and conditions of such loans are prima facie not prejudicial to
the interest of the Company.
d. The payments of principal amount and interest where ever stipulated
in respect of such loans have been regular.
e In respect of loans and advances in the nature of loans given by the
Company, the parties/employees have generally repaid the principal
amount and interest as per terms, wherever stipulated,
iv) In our opinion, there is an adequate internal control system
commensurate with the size of the Company and nature of its business
with regard to purchase of inventory, fixed assets and the sale of
goods & services. We have not observed any major weakness in the
internal control system during the course of the audit.
v )(a) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has entered into contracts or arrangements
referred to in section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956, the particulars
of which are required to be entered in the register required to be
maintained under that section.
(b) In the absence of competitive information provided to us, we are
unable to comment regarding the reasonableness of prices of the
transactions entered. In our opinion, the Company has not entered into
any contracts or arrangements referred to in Section 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956, the particulars of which are required to be
entered in the register, maintained section 301.
vi) In our opinion, the Company has not accepted any deposits from the
public within the meaning of section 58A and section 58AA or any other
relevant provisions of the Act and the Companies (Acceptance of
Deposits) Rules, 1975 with regard to the deposits accepted from the
public. No order has been passed by the Company Law Board or National
Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any Court or any other
Tribunal.
vi) In our opinion, the company has an internal audit system
commensurate with the size and nature of its business. However, no
Internal Audit Report was shown to us.
vF:if The maintenance of cost records prescribed under section
209(1)(d) of the Companies Act,1956, is not applicable to the company,
''X) In respect of disputed and undisputed Statutory Dues of the Company
and according to information and explanations given to us and on the
basis of our examination of the records of the Company
a. Amounts deducted / accrued in the books of accounts in respect of
Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees''
State Insurance, Income tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax,
Customs Duty, Excise Duty and any other material Statutory Dues have
generally been regularly deposited during the year by the Company with
the appropriate authorities, to the extent applicable. There were no
dues on account of Cess under Section 441A of the Companies Act, 1956
since the aforesaid section has not yet been made effective by the
Central Government. b. According to the information and explanations
given to us, no undisputed amounts payablein respect aforesaid dues
were in arrears, as at March 31, 2013 for a period of more than six
months from the date they became payable, wherever applicable except
Employer''s contribution to Provident Fund Employee contribution to
Provident Fund, Administration charges on Provident Fund, Service Tax,
Luxury Tax and VAT amounting to Rs.7.18 Lacs, Rs. 4.66 Lacs, Rs. 0.38
Lacs, Rs. 7.98 Lacs, Rs. 18.86 Lacs and 5.93 Lacs respectively.
x) The Company has accumulated losses at the end of the financial year
more than the Net Worth of the company and it has incurred cash losses
in the current year as well as immediately preceding financial year.
xi) Based on our audit procedures and in our opinion, the Company has
not defaulted in repayment of dues to financial institutions or banks
or debenture holders except for car loan from Central Bank of India,
ICICI Bank Limited, Tata Capital Limited and Kotak Mahindra Limited,
but during the financial year company has made settlement/ paid all
these loans except loan from Central bank of India.
xii) The Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of
security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
Accordingly, the provisions of paragraph 4 clause (xii) of the Order
are not applicable.
xiii) The Company is not a Chit Fund or a Nidhi/Mutual Benefit fund/
society. Accordingly, the provisions of paragraph 4 clause (xiii) of
the Order are not applicable.
xiv) In our opinion the company is not dealing or trading in shares,
debentures, securities and other investments. Accordingly, the
provisions of paragraph 4 clause (xiv) of the Order are not applicable.
xv) In our opinion, the terms and conditions of guarantees given by the
Company for loans taken by others from banks and financial institutions
are not prima facie prejudicial to the interests of the Company.
xvi) In our opinion and to the best of our knowledge and belief,
proceeds of term loans taken were, prima facie, applied for the purpose
it was obtained and no fresh term loan was obtained during the year.
xvii) In our opinion and on an overall examination of the balance sheet
of the Company, no funds have been raised on short-term basis.
xviii) In our opinion, the Company has not made any preferential
allotment of shares to parties or companies covered in the register
maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
xix) In our opinion and the records examined by us, no debentures have
been issued during the year.
xx) The Company has not raised any monies by way of public issue during
the year. Accordingly, the provisions of paragraph 4 clause (xx) of the
Order are not applicable.
xxi) In our opinion, no material fraud on or by the Company has been
noticed or reported during the period covered by our audit.
FOR SHARMA GOEL & CO.
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
FRN: 000643N
Amar Mittal
Place: New Delhi Partner
Date: 30.05.2013 M.No. 017755
Mar 31, 2012
1. We have audited the accompanying financial statements of U.G.
Hotels and Resorts Limited ("the Company") which comprise the Balance
Sheet as at March 31, 2012 and the Statement of Profit and Loss and the
Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company''s management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements
based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing
generally accepted in India. These Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by the management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003, as
amended by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004,
issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub- section (4A)
of Section 227 of ''The Companies Act, 1956'' of India (the ''Act''), we
enclose in the Annexure, a statement on the matters specified in
paragraph 4 and 5 of the said order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we
report that:
i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit;
ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of
those books;
iii) The Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow
Statement, dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account;
iv) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss and
Cash Flow Statement, dealt with by this report comply with the
Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of
the Act;
v ) On the basis of written representations received from the
directors, as at March 31, 2012 and taken on record by the Board of
Directors, we report that none of the directors other than Harmit Ghai
are disqualified as at March 31, 2012 from being appointed as a
director in terms of Section 274 (1) (g) of the Act;
vi) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts due to Note 6(A) of
regarding dispute & compromise with UMAK Investment Company Private
Limited & Note 13 of regarding non provision of doubtful debts for Rs.
47.74 lacs, give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956,
in the manner so required but don''t give a true and fair view in
conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India,
in view of the dispute and compromise with UMAK Investment Company
Private Limited is still pending at various levels.
(a) In the case of Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at March 31, 2012
(b) In the case of Statement of Profit and Loss, of the loss of the
Company for the year ended on that date; and
(c) In the case of Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows of the
Company for the year ended on that date.
Annexure to the Auditors'' Report of even date to the members of U.G.
Hotels & Resorts Limited, on the financial statements for the year
ended March 31, 2012 (Refer to in paragraph 3 of our report of even
date)
Based on the Audit Procedures performed for the purpose of reporting a
true and fair view on the financials statements of the company and
taking into the consideration the information and explanation given to
us and the books of accounts and other records examined by us in the
normal course of audit, we report that: i) In respect of Fixed Assets
of the Company and in our opinion:
a. The Company has not maintained proper Fixed Assets records.
b. The Company has a programme of physical verification of its fixed
assets by which they are verified annually. In accordance with this
programme, fixed assets were verified during the year and no
discrepancies were noticed on such verification. In our opinion, the
frequency of the physical verification is reasonable having regards to
the size of the company and nature of fixed assets.
c. The Company has not disposed off substantial part of any fixed
assets during the year. Therefore the going concern assumption is not
affected.
ii) In respect of Inventories of the Company and in our opinion:
a. Inventories have been physically verified by management during the
year and the frequency of verification is reasonable.
b. The procedures for physical verification of inventory followed by
the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of
the Company and the nature of its business.
c. The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory. No material
discrepancies were noticed on physical verification of inventory.
iii) In respect of loans, secured or unsecured, granted to or taken
from companies, firms or other parties covered in the register
maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, in our opinion:
a. The Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained
under Section 301 of the Act.
b. The Company has taken loans from two parties covered in the
register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The
maximum amount outstanding at any time during the year aggregated to
Rs. 66,68,743 and the balance outstanding at year end is Rs. 66,68743.
( Refer Note  6 to Notes to Accounts)
c . In our opinion rate of interest, where ever stipulated and other
terms and conditions of such loans are prima facie not prejudicial to
the interest of the Company. d. The payments of principal amount and
interest where ever stipulated in respect of such loans have been
regular.
iv) In our opinion, there is an adequate internal control system
commensurate with the size of the Company and nature of its business
with regard to purchase of inventory, fixed assets and the sale of
goods & services. We have not observed any major weakness in the
internal control system during the course of the audit.
v ) (a) In our opinion and according to the information and
explanations given to us, the Company has entered into contracts or
arrangements referred to in section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956, the
particulars of which are required to be entered in the register
required to be maintained under that section. (b) In the absence of
competitive information provided to us, we are unable to comment
regarding the reasonableness of prices of the transactions entered. In
our opinion, the Company has not entered into any contracts or
arrangements referred to in Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956, the
particulars of which are required to be entered in the register,
maintained section 301.
vi) In our opinion, the Company has not accepted any deposits from the
public within the meaning of section 58A and section 58AA or any other
relevant provisions of the Act and the Companies (Acceptance of
Deposits) Rules, 1975 with regard to the deposits accepted from the
public. No order has been passed by the Company Law Board or National
Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any Court or any other
Tribunal.
vii) In our opinion, the company has an internal audit system
commensurate with the size and nature of its business. However, no
Internal Audit Report was shown to us.
viii) The maintenance of cost records prescribed under section
209(1)(d) of the Companies Act,1956, is not applicable to the company.
ix) In respect of disputed and undisputed Statutory Dues of the Company
and according to information and explanations given to us and on the
basis of our examination of the records of the Company
a. Amounts deducted / accrued in the books of accounts in respect of
Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees''
State Insurance, Income tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax,
Customs Duty, Excise Duty and any other material Statutory Dues have
generally been regularly deposited during the year by the Company with
the appropriate authorities, to the extent applicable. There were no
dues on account of Cess under Section 441A of the Companies Act, 1956
since the aforesaid section has not yet been made effective by the
Central Government.
b. According to the information and explanations given to us, no
undisputed amounts payable in respect aforesaid dues were in arrears,
as at March 31, 2012 for a period of more than six months from the date
they became payable, wherever applicable except Employer''s contribution
to Provident Fund, Employee contribution to Provident Fund, Service
Tax, Luxury Tax and VAT amounting to Rs.3.13 Lacs, Rs. 3.19 Lacs, Rs.
3.87 Lacs, Rs. 8.14 Lacs and 3.02 Lacs respectively.
x) The Company has accumulated losses at the end of the financial year
more than the Net Worth of the company and it has incurred cash losses
in the current year as well as immediately preceding financial year.
xi) Based on our audit procedures and in our opinion, the Company has
not defaulted in repayment of dues to financial institutions or banks
or debenture holders except for car loan from Central Bank of India,
ICICI Bank Limited, Tata Capital Limited and Kotak Mahindra Limited.
xii) The Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of
security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
Accordingly, the provisions of paragraph 4 clause (xii) of the Order
are not applicable.
xiii) The Company is not a Chit Fund or a Nidhi/Mutual Benefit fund/
society. Accordingly, the provisions of paragraph 4 clause (xiii) of
the Order are not applicable.
xiv) In our opinion the company is not dealing or trading in shares,
debentures, securities and other investments. Accordingly, the
provisions of paragraph 4 clause (xiv) of the Order are not applicable.
xv) In our opinion, the terms and conditions of guarantees given by the
Company for loans taken by others from banks and financial
institutions, are not prima facie prejudicial to the interests of the
Company.
xvi) In our opinion and to the best of our knowledge and belief,
proceeds of term loans taken were, prima facie, applied for the purpose
it was obtained and no fresh term loan was obtained during the year.
xvii) In our opinion and on an overall examination of the balance sheet
of the Company, no funds have been raised on short-term basis.
xviii) In our opinion, the Company has not made any preferential
allotment of shares to parties or companies covered in the register
maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
xix) In our opinion and the records examined by us, no debentures have
been issued during the year.
xx) The Company has not raised any monies by way of public issue during
the year. Accordingly, the provisions of paragraph 4 clause (xx) of the
Order are not applicable.
xxi) In our opinion, no material fraud on or by the Company has been
noticed or reported during the period covered by our audit.
For Sharma Goel & Co.
Chartered Accountants
FRN : 000643N
Amar Mittal
Place: New Delhi Partner
Date: 1st September, 2012 Membership No. 017755
Mar 31, 2010
We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of U.G. Hotels & Resorts
Limited as at 31st March, 2010 and the Profit & Loss Account and the
Cash Flow Statement of the company for the year ended on that date
annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our
audit in accordance with Auditing Standards gener- ally accepted in
India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free from
material misstatements. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes as- sessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well
as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
1. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 issued
by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of
Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure A
a statement on the matters specified in paragraph 4 and 5 of the said
Order.
2. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above and
subject to:
a) We have obtained all information and explanations, which to the best
of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit.
b) In our opinion, proper books of accounts as required by law have
been kept by the company so far as appears from our examination of the
books.
c) The Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss Account dealt with by the report
are in agreement with the books of accounts and re- turns.
d) In our opinion the aforesaid Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss Account
comply in all material respects with the applicable accounting
standards referred to in Sub Section (3C) of Section 211 of the
Companies Act, 1956;
e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors,
as on 31st March 2010 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we
report that none of directors is disquali- fied from being appointed as
a director in terms of clause (g) of sub section (I) to section 274 of
companies Act, 1956 except one of the director.
f) No comments are offered on clause (g) of the Section 227(3) of the
Companies Act, 1956, since the Central Government has not yet published
any notification in the Official Gazette for levy and collection of
cess under section 441A of the Compa- nies Act, 1956;
g) In our opinion and to the best of pur information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts Subject to Note No. 7
of Notes to Accounts (Schedule 13), regard- ing dispute & compromise
with UMAX Investment Com- pany Private Limited & Note No. 24 of Notes
to Ac- counts (Schedule 13), regarding non provision of doubt- ful
debts for Rs. 46.67 lacs, give the information required by the
Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required but dont give a true
and fair view in conformity with the ac- counting principles generally
accepted in India, in view of the dispute & compromise with UMAX
Investment Com- pany Private Limited which is still pending at various
levels.
i. In case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31st March,2010 ; ii. In case of the Profit & Loss
account, Loss of the company for the year ended on that date; and iii.
In case of the Cash Flow Statement, the Cash Flows of the company for
the year ended on that date.
ANNEXURE A REFERRED TO IN PARA 1 OF OUR REPORT OF EVEN DATE ON THE
ACCOUNTS OF U.G. HOTELS & RESORTS LTD. FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31st MARCH,
2010
I) In respect of fixed assets of the company:-
(a) The Company has not shown fixed assets records showing full
particulars, including quantitative details and situation of its fixed
assets.
(b) No records evidencing physical verification of Fixed Assets was
shown to us and hence we are unable to comment on this.
(c) No substantial part of Fixed Assets has been disposed off during
the year, which has a bearing on the Going Concern Assumption.
II) In respect of inventories of the company
(a) The inventory were physically verified by the management during the
year at reasonable interval.
(b) In our opinion, the procedures of physical verification of
inventory followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in
relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.
(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The
discrepancies noticed on physical verification of inventory as compared
to book records which have been dealt with in the books of account were
not material.
III) (a) The Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained
under Section 301 of the Act. Accordingly, paragraph (iii)(b), (iii)(c)
& (iii)(d) of the order are not applicable to the Company.
(b) The Company has in the earlier year shown unsecured loan from
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained
under Section 301 of the Act. However, these are subject to Note No. 7
of Notes on Accounts and our qualification in main Audit Report.
Further, the Company has taken unsecured loan from the parties covered
in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Act. These loans
are interest free. Apart from it, the terms and conditions of these
loans taken by the Company, are not prima facie prejudicial to the
interest of the company. In respect of the aforesaid loans, the company
is generally regular in payment of the principal wherever stipulated.
IV) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there is adequate internal control system commensurate
with the size of the company and the nature of its business for the
purchase of inventory, fixed assets and for the sale of goods and
services. Further, on the basis of our examination of the books and
records of the company, and according to the information and
explanations given to us, we have neither come across nor have been
informed of any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in the
aforesaid internal control system.
V) (a) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, Contracts or arrangements referred to in Section 301 have
been entered with such parties. (b) In the absence of competitive
information provided to us, we are unable to comment regarding the
reasonableness of prices of the transactions entered.
VI) The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public within
the meaning of Sections 58A, 58AA or any other relevant provisions of
the Act and the rules framed there under.
VII) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system. However,
no internal audit report was shown to us.
VIII) No cost records have been prescribed by the Central Government
under Section 209 (1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 to be maintained
by the Company.
IX) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us and
the records of the Company examined by us in our opinion, the company
is generally regular in depositing the undisputed statutory dues
including Provident fund, Investor education and protection fund,
Employees state insurance, Income tax, Sales tax, Wealth tax, Service
Tax, Customs Duty, Excise duty, Cess and other material statutory dues
as applicable with the appropriate authorities in India except
Provident Fund of Rs. 39,366/- for the month of March10 not been
paid.
Name of
the statute Nature of dues Amount
(Rs. in lacs) Forum where
dispute is
pending
Himachal
Pradesh
Tax On
Luxuries Tax Interest
& Penalty 2.07 Excise &
Taxation
Officer
(in hotels
& lodging
houses )
Act,1979
Income
Tax Act,
1961 TDS & Interest 0.55 N.A.
Records for Luxury Tax were not available for our inspection.
X) The accumulated losses of the Company are more than One Hundred
percent of its net worth. The Company has not incurred cash losses
during the financial year covered by our audit and in the immediately
preceding financial year.
XI) The Company has entered into a one time settlement with IFCI & TFCI
in the earlier years. In terms of one time settlement, the Company has
cleared the entire dues of IFCI & TFCI in the earlier years. Further,
the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to Financial
Institutions & Bank. Moreover, the Company does not have any
outstanding Debenture.
XII) The Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of
security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
XIII) The provisions of any special statute applicable to chit fund /
nidhi /mutual benefit fund / societies are not applicable to the
Company.
XIV) In our opinion, the Company is not a dealer or trader in shares,
securities, debentures and other investments.
XV) In our opinion, and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by
others from banks or financial institutions during the year.
XVI) In our opinion, and according to the information and explanations
given to us, on an overall basis, the term loans have been applied for
the purposes for which they were obtained.
XVII) On the basis of an over all examination of Balance Sheet of the
Company, in our opinion and according to the information and
explanations given to us, there are no funds raised on a short-term
basis which have been used for long term investment.
XVIII) The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to
parties and companies covered in the register maintained under Section
301 of the Act during the year.
XIX) The Company has no debentures outstanding at the year-end.
XX) The Company has not raised any money by public issues during the
year.
XXI) During the course of our examination of the books and records of
the Company, carried out in accordance with the generally accepted
auditing practices in India, and according to the information and
explanations given to us, we have neither come across any instance of
fraud on or by the Company, noticed or reported during the year, nor
have we been informed of such case by the management except dispute &
compromise with UMAX Investment Company Private Limited as mentioned in
Note No. 7 of Notes on Accounts (Schedule 13).
For SHARMA GOEL & CO.
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
FRNo. 000643N
Place: New Delhi
Date: 3rd September, 2010 AMAR MITTAL
PARTNER
M.No. 017755
Mar 31, 2009
We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of U.G. Hotels & Resorts
Limited as at 31 st March, 2009 and the Profit & Loss Account and the
Cash Flow Statement of the company for the year ended on that date
annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our
audit in accordance with Auditing Standards generally accepted in
India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free from
material misstatements. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
1. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 issued
by the Central Government of India in terms of sub- section (4A) of
Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure A
a statement on the matters specified in paragraph 4 and 5 of the said
Order.
2. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above and
subject to:
a) We have obtained all information and explanations, which to the best
of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit.
b) In our opinion, proper books of accounts as required by law have
been kept by the company so far as appears from our examination of the
books.
c) The Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss Account dealt with by the report
are in agreement with the books of accounts and returns.
d) In our opinion the aforesaid Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss Account
comply in all material respects with the applicable accounting
standards referred to in Sub Section (3C) of Section 211 of the
Companies Act, 1956;
e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors,
as on 31 st March 2009 and taken on record by the Board of Directors,
we report the none of directors is disqualified from being appointed as
a director in terms of clause (g) of sub section (I) to section 274 of
companies Act, 1956.
f) No comments are offered on clause (g) of the Section 227(3) of the
Companies Act, 1956, since the Central Government has not yet published
any notification in the Official Gazette for levy and collection of
cess under section 441A of the Companies Act, 1956;
g) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts Subject to Note No. 7
of Notes to Accounts (Schedule 13), regarding dispute & compromise with
Umak Investment Company Private Limited & Note No. 24 of Notes to
Accounts (Schedule 13), regarding non provision of doubtful debts for
Rs. 39.32 lacs, give the information required I the Companies Act,
1956, in the manner so required be dont give a true and fair view in
conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India,
in view the dispute & compromise with Umak Investment Company Private
Limited.
i. In case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31st March,2009 ;
ii. In case of the Profit & Loss account, Loss of the company for the
year ended on that date; and
iii. In case of the Cash Flow Statement, the Cash Flows the company for
the year ended on that date.
ANNEXURE A REFERRED TO IN PARA 1 OF OUR REPORT OF EVEN DATE ON THE
ACCOUNTS OF U.G. HOTELS RESORTS LTD. FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 ST MARCH,
2009
I) In respect of fixed assets of the company:-
(a) The Company has maintained proper records to show flow particulars,
including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.
(b) The fixed assets have been physically verified by the management at
reasonable intervals and no material discrepancies have been noticed on
such verification.
(c) No substantial part of Fixed Assets has been disposed during the
year, which has a bearing on the Going Concerned Assumption.
II) In respect of inventories of the company
(b) The inventory were physically verified by the management during the
year at reasonable interval.
(c) In our opinion, the procedures of physical verification < inventory
followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to
the size of the Company and the nature of its business.
(d) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventor The
discrepancies noticed on physical verification inventory as compared to
book records which have beë dealt with in the books of account were not
material.
III) (a) The Company has not granted any loans, secured unsecured to
companies, firms or other parties covered the register maintained under
Section 301 of the A Accordingly, paragraph (iii)(b), (iii)(c) &
(iii)(d) of the one are not applicable to the Company. (b) The Company
has in the earlier year shown unsecur loan from companies, firms or
other parties cover in the register maintained under Section 301 of the
Act. However, these are subject to Note No. 7 Notes on Accounts and our
qualification in me Audit Report.
Further, the Company has taken unsecured loan from the parties covered
in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Act. These loans
are interest free. Apart from it, the terms and conditions of
these-loans taken by the Company, are not prima facie prejudicial to
the interest of the company. In respect of the aforesaid loans, the
company is generally regular in payment of the principal wherever *
stipulated.
V) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there is adequate internal control system commensurate
with the
size of the company and the nature of its business for the purchase of
inventory, fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services.
Further, on the basis of our examination of the books and records of
the company, and according to the information and explanations given to
us, we have neither come across nor have been informed of any
continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in the aforesaid
internal control æ system.
V) (a) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, Contracts or arrangements referred to in Section 301 have
been entered with such parties, (b) In the absence of competitive
information provided to us, we are unable to comment regarding the
reasonableness of prices of the transactions entered.
VI) The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public within
the meaning of Sections 58A, 58AA or any other relevant provisions of
the Act and the rules framed there under.
VII) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system
commensurate with its size and nature of its business.
VIII) No cost records have been prescribed by the Central Government
under Section 209 (1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 to be maintained
by the Company.
IX) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us and
the records of the Company examined by us in our opinion, the company
is generally regular in depositing the undisputed statutory dues
including Provident fund, Investor education and protection fund,
Employees state insurance, Income tax, Sales tax, Wealth tax, Service
Tax, Customs Duty, Excise duty, Cess and other material statutory dues
as applicable with the appropriate authorities in India . (b)
According to the information and explanations given to us, there is no
undisputed amount payable in respect of Income tax, Sales Tax, Wealth
Tax, Service tax, Custom Duty, Excise duty, Cess and luxury tax as at
March 31, 2009 for a period more than six months from the date they
became payable except as mentioned below.
Name of the
statue Nature of dues Amount (Rs. in lacs) Forum where
dispute is pending
Himachal Pradesh
Tax On Luxuries Tax Interest
& Penalty 4.67 Excise & Taxation
Officer
(in hotels &
lodging houses )
Act, 1979.
X) The accumulated losses of the Company are more than One Hundred
percent of its net worth. The Company has not incurred cash losses
during the financial year covered by our audit and in the immediately
preceding financial year.
XI) The Company has entered into a one time settlement with IFCI & TFCI
in the earlier years. In terms of one time settlement, the Company has
cleared the entire dues of IFCI & TFCI in the earlier years. Further,
the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to Financial
Institutions & Bank. Moreover, the Company does not have any
outstanding Debenture.
XII) The Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of
security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities
XIII) The provisions of any special statute applicable to chit fund /
nidhi /mutual benefit fund / societies are not applicable to the
Company.
XIV) In our opinion, the Company is not a dealer or trader in shares,
securities, debentures and other investments.
XV) In our opinion, and according,to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by
others from banks or financial institutions during the year.
XVI) In our opinion, and according to the information and explanations
given to us, on an overall basis, the term loans have been applied for
the purposes for which they were obtained.
XVII) On the basis of an over all examination of Balance Sheet of the
Company, in our opinion and according to the information and
explanations given to us, there are no funds raised on a short-term
basis which have been used for long term investment.
XVIII) The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to
parties and companies covered in the register maintained under Section
301 of the Act during the year.
XIX) The Company has no debentures outstanding at the year-end,
XX) The Company has not raised any money by public issues during the
year.
XXI) During the course of our examination of the books and records of
the Company, carried out in accordance with the generally accepted
auditing practices in India, and according to the information and
explanations given to us, we have neither come across any instance of
fraud on or by the Company, noticed or reported during the year, nor
have we been informed of such case by the management except dispute &
compromise with Umak Investment Company Private Limited as mentioned in
Note No. 7 of Notes on Accounts (Schedule 13).
For SHARMA GOEL & CO.
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
AMAR MITTAL
Place: New Delhi PARTNER
Date: 1st September, 2009 M. No. 017755
Disclaimer: This is 3rd Party content/feed, viewers are requested to use their discretion and conduct proper diligence before investing, GoodReturns does not take any liability on the genuineness and correctness of the information in this article