Home  »  Company  »  Unichem Labs  »  Quotes  »  Auditor Report
Enter the first few characters of Company and click 'Go'

Auditor Report of Unichem Laboratories Ltd.

Mar 31, 2022

Unichem Laboratories LimitedReport on the Audit of the Standalone Financial Statements

Qualified Opinion

1. We have audited the accompanying standalone financial statements of Unichem Laboratories Limited (“the Company") which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 31st March, 2022, the Statement of Profit and Loss (including other comprehensive income), the Statement of Changes in Equity and the Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended on that date and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information (hereinafter referred to as “standalone financial statements”).

2. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, except for the effects of the matter described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph below, the aforesaid standalone financial statements give the information required by the Companies Act, 2013 (“the Act”) in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) prescribed under section 133 of the Act read with the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015, as amended, and other accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31 st March, 2022, the loss and total comprehensive income, changes in equity and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Basis for Qualified Opinion

3. We draw attention to note 38 of standalone financial statements regarding the EU fine matter and the Company financial exposure of '' 12,267.33 lakhs in the subsidiary (Niche Generics Limited, UK) in respect of which no provision for impairment is made in view of uncertainty as regards the EU fine matter. The impact on the standalone financial statements of including the above provision would be that the Company would show loss for the year of '' 12,273.09 lakhs and balance in other equity of '' 253,528.64 lakhs as at balance sheet date as against the reported figures of loss for the year of '' 5.76 lakhs and other equity of '' 265,795.97 lakhs.

4. We conducted our audit of the standalone financial statements in accordance with the Standards on Auditing (SAs) specified under section 143(10) of the Act. Our responsibilities under those Standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the standalone financial statements section of our report. We are independent of the Company in accordance with the Code of Ethics issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India together with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the standalone financial statements under the provisions of the Act and the Rules thereunder, and we have fulfilled our ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the Code of Ethics. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our qualified opinion on the standalone financial statements.

Key Audit Matters

5. Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the standalone financial statements of the current period. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the standalone financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters. In addition to the matter described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion, we have determined the matter described below to be the key audit matter to be communicated in our report.

5.1. Impairment test of investment in subsidiary at Ireland

Investment in subsidiary is carried in the Company’s standalone financial statements at cost less impairment. The carrying value of investment made by the Company in its subsidiary (Unichem Laboratories Limited, Ireland) as per standalone financial statements is aggregating '' 2,104.84 lakhs as at 31st March, 2022. In case of this subsidiary, there are accumulated losses and low net-worth as at balance sheet date. Considering the overall exposure in this subsidiary, need for impairment test is a key audit matter. Based on the financial projections of the above subsidiary, the management is of the view that recoverable amount is higher than carrying value of these investments and there is no impairment of investment as at balance sheet date. For the purpose of our audit, we have considered the following aspect:

a. Analytical review of gross margins earned by the subsidiary.

b. Discussion with management for business outlook (including future financial projections of the above subsidiaries) and plans for overall turnaround of the subsidiary.

c. Evaluated the performance in the current year as compared to last year and prior year achievement as compared to the budget.

d. Discussion with the auditor of subsidiary for the basis on which they have concluded that there is no impairment of assets in the books of subsidiary

Based on our evaluation of management estimates, other information & discussion with the management, we agree with the management views and estimates and conclude that no provision for impairment is required as at date of our audit report.

Refer to note 6.1 of the standalone financial statements.

Information Other than the Standalone Financial Statements and Auditor’s Report Thereon

6. The Company’s Board of Directors is responsible for the preparation of the other information. The other information comprises the information included in the Management Discussion and Analysis, Board’s Report including Annexures to Board’s Report, Corporate Governance, Business Responsibility Report and Shareholder’s Information, but does not include the standalone financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon.

Our opinion on the standalone financial statements does not cover the other information and we will not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the standalone financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the standalone financial statements or our knowledge obtained during the course of our audit or otherwise appears to be materially m isstated.

If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report the fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.

Management’s Responsibility for the Standalone Financial Statements

7. The Company’s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Act with respect to the preparation of these standalone financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance, total comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the Ind AS and accounting principles generally accepted in India. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the standalone financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the standalone financial statements, the Board of Directors is responsible for assessing the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the Board of Directors either intends to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.

The Board of Directors are also responsible for overseeing the Company’s financial reporting process.

Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Standalone Financial Statements

8. Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the standalone financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with SAs will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. M isstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these standalone financial statements.

As part of an audit in accordance with SAs, we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. We also:

• Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the standalone financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.

• Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. Under section 143(3)(i) of the Companies Act, 2013, we are also responsible for expressing our opinion on whether the Company has adequate internal financial controls system in place and the operating effectiveness of such controls.

• Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by the management.

• Conclude on the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the standalone financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Company to cease to continue as a going concern.

• Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the standalone financial statements, including the disclosures, and whether the standalone financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.

Materiality is the magnitude of misstatements in the standalone financial statements that, individually or in aggregate, makes it probable that the economic decisions of a reasonably knowledgeable user of the financial statements may be influenced. We consider quantitative materiality and qualitative factors in (i) planning the scope of our audit work and in evaluating the results of our work; and (ii) to evaluate the effect of any identified misstatements in the standalone financial statements.

We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.

We also provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards.

From the matters communicated with those charged with governance, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of standalone financial statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditor’s report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

9. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2020 (the “Order”) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of Section 143(11) of the Act, we give in the “Annexure I” a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.

10. As required by Section 143 (3) of the Act, we report that:

a. Except in respect of matter specified in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph above, we have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

b. Except for the effects of the matter described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph above, in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books;

c. The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss including Other Comprehensive Income, Statement of Changes in Equity and the Statement of Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account;

d. Except for the effects of the matter described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph above, in our opinion, the aforesaid standalone financial statements comply with the Ind AS specified under Section 133 of the Act;

e. The matter described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph above, in our opinion, may not have an adverse impact on the functioning of the Company;

f. On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on 31 st March, 2022 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors are disqualified as on 31 st March, 2022 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164(2) of the Act;

g. With respect to the adequacy of internal financial controls over financial reporting of the Company and the operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to our separate report given in “Annexure II”. Our report expresses an unmodified opinion on the adequacy and operating effectiveness of the Company’s internal financial controls over financial reporting;

h. The qualification relating to the maintenance of accounts and other matters connected therewith are as stated in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph above;

i. With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor’s Report in accordance with the requirements of section 197(16) of the Act:

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the remuneration paid by the Company to its directors during the year is in accordance with the provisions of section 197 of the Act; and

j. With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor’s Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, as amended, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i. The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position in its standalone financial statements -Refer note 37(A)(i), 37(A)(ii), 37(B)(i), 37(B)(iii) and 37(B)(iv) to the standalone financial statements;

ii. The Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses; and

iii. There has been no delay in transferring amounts, required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.

iv. (a) The Management has represented that, to the best of its knowledge and belief, no funds have been advanced or loaned or invested (either from borrowed funds or share premium or any other sources or kind of funds) by the Company to or in any other person or entity, including foreign entity (“Intermediaries”), with the understanding, whether recorded in writing or otherwise, that the Intermediary shall, whether, directly or indirectly lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or on behalf of the Company (“Ultimate Beneficiaries”) or provide any guarantee, security or the like on behalf of the Ultimate Beneficiaries;

(b) The Management has represented, that, to the best of its knowledge and belief, no funds have been received by the Company from any person or entity, including foreign entity (“Funding Parties”), with the understanding, whether recorded in writing or otherwise, that the Company shall, whether, directly or indirectly, lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or on behalf of the Funding Party (“Ultimate Beneficiaries”) or provide any guarantee, security or the like on behalf of the Ultimate Beneficiaries;

(c) Based on the audit procedures that have been considered reasonable and appropriate in the circumstances, nothing has come to our notice that has caused us to believe that the representations under sub-clause (i) and (ii) of Rule 11 (e), as provided under (a) and (b) above, contain any material misstatement. Also, refer note 60 of the standalone financial statement.

v. As stated in note 18 to the standalone financial statements:

(a) The final dividend proposed in the previous year, declared and paid by the Company during the year is in accordance with Section 123 of the Act.

(b) The Board of Directors of the Company have proposed final dividend for the year which is subject to the approval of the members at the ensuing Annual General Meeting. The amount of dividend proposed is in accordance with section 123 of the Act.

For N. A. Shah Associates LLP

Chartered Accountants

Firm''s Registration No.: 116560W/W100149

Milan Mody

Partner

Membership No.: 103286 UDIN.: 22103286AJSRSQ4129

Place: Mumbai Date: 27th May, 2022


Mar 31, 2019

Independent Auditors’ Report to the Members of Unichem Laboratories Limited

To

The Members of

Unichem Laboratories Limited Report on the Audit of the Standalone Financial Statements Opinion

1. We have audited the accompanying standalone financial statements of Unichem Laboratories Limited (“the Company") which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 31st March 2019, and the Statement of Profit and Loss (including other comprehensive income), the Statement of Changes in Equity, and the Statement of Cash Flows for the year then ended on that date, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information (hereinafter referred to as “standalone financial statements”).

2. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid standalone financial statements give the information required by the Companies Act, 2013 (“the Act”) in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) prescribed under section 133 of the Act read with the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015, as amended, and other accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31st March 2019, the profit and total comprehensive income, changes in equity and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Basis for Opinion

3. We conducted our audit of the standalone financial statements in accordance with the Standards on Auditing (SAs) specified under section 143(10) of the Act. Our responsibilities under those Standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Standalone Financial Statements section of our report. We are independent of the Company in accordance with the Code of Ethics issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India together with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the standalone financial statements under the provisions of the Act and the Rules there under, and we have fulfilled our ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the Code of Ethics. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion on the standalone financial statements.

Emphasis of Matter

4. We draw attention to Note 35 of the standalone financial statements, which informs that the General Court of the European Union has on 12th December 2018 rejected the appeal and confirmed the fine of Euro 13.96 Million (equivalent to ''10,890.20 lakhs) imposed by the European Commission jointly and severally on the Company and its subsidiary (Niche Generics Limited, UK).The Company based on legal advice and merits has filed an appeal against the decision of General Court before the Court of Justice of the European Union and outcome of the appeal is awaited. Considering the above, in view of the management, no provision for the aforesaid fine is considered necessary and is disclosed as a contingent liability in note 34(ii) of the standalone financial statement. This matter was reported under ‘Emphasis of Matter’ paragraph in our limited review report for the standalone financial results for the quarter and nine-months ended 31st December 2018 and auditor’s report for the consolidated financial statement for the year ended 31st March 2018. Our opinion is not modified in respect of above matter.

Key Audit Matters

5. Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the standalone financial statements of the current period. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the standalone financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters. We have determined the matters described below to be the key audit matters to be communicated in our report.

5.1. Contingent liability as elaborated above in ‘Emphasis of Matter’ paragraph

As elaborated in ‘Emphasis of Matter’ paragraph given above, the Company based on legal advice and merits has filed an appeal against the decision of General Court before the Court of Justice of the European Union and outcome of the appeal is awaited. This matter of contingent liability is considered as key audit matter for the current audit period and we have relied on the management assessment which is supported by legal advice and merits that the aforesaid fine is considered as contingent liability.

Refer to note. 34(ii) and note 35 of the standalone financial statements.

5.2. Impairment test of investment in subsidiaries at UK and Ireland

Investments in subsidiaries are carried in the Company’s standalone financial statement at cost less impairment. The carrying value of investments made by the Company in its subsidiaries (Niche Generics Limited, UK and Unichem

Laboratories Limited, Ireland) as per standalone financial statements is aggregating ''8,273.97 lakhs as at 31st March 2019. In case of these subsidiaries, there are operating losses in current year, accumulated losses and low net-worth as at balance sheet date. Considering the overall exposure in these subsidiaries, need for impairment test was the key audit matter. Based on the financial projections of the above subsidiaries , the management is of the view that recoverable amount is higher than carrying value of these investments and there is no impairment of investments as at balance sheet date. For the purpose of our audit we have considered the following aspect:

a. Analytical review of gross margins earned by these subsidiaries

b. Discussion with management for business outlook (including future financial projections of the above subsidiaries) and plans for overall turnaround of these subsidiaries

c. Evaluated the performance in the current year as compared to last year and prior year achievement as compared to budget.

d. Discussion with the auditor’s of subsidiaries for the basis on which they have concluded that there is no impairment of assets in the books of subsidiary.

Based on our evaluation of management estimates, other information & discussion with the management, we agree with the management views and estimates and conclude that no provision for impairment is required as at date of our audit report

Refer to note 5.2 of the standalone financial statements.

Information Other than the Standalone Financial Statements and Auditor’s Report Thereon

6. The Company’s Board of Directors is responsible for the preparation of the other information. The other information comprises the information included in the Management Discussion and Analysis, Board’s Report including Annexures to Board’s Report, Corporate Governance and Shareholder’s Information, but does not include the standalone financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon.

Our opinion on the standalone financial statements does not cover the other information and we will not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the standalone financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the standalone financial statements or our knowledge obtained during the course of our audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.

If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report the fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.

Management’s Responsibility for the Standalone Financial Statements

7. The Company’s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Act with respect to the preparation of these standalone financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance, total comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the Ind AS and accounting principles generally accepted in India. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the standalone financial statement that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the standalone financial statements, the Board of Directors is responsible for assessing the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the Board of Directors either intends to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.

The Board of Directors are also responsible for overseeing the Company’s financial reporting process.

Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Standalone Financial Statements

8. Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the standalone financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with SAs will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these standalone financial statements.

As part of an audit in accordance with SAs, we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. We also:

- Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the standalone financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.

- Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. Under section 143(3)(I) of the Companies Act, 2013, we are also responsible for expressing our opinion on whether the company has adequate internal financial controls system in place and the operating effectiveness of such controls.

- Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by management.

- Conclude on the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the standalone financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Company to cease to continue as a going concern.

- Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the standalone financial statements, including the disclosures, and whether the standalone financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.

Materiality is the magnitude of misstatements in the standalone financial statements that, individually or in aggregate, makes it probable that the economic decisions of a reasonably knowledgeable user of the financial statements may be influenced. We consider quantitative materiality and qualitative factors in (i) planning the scope of our audit work and in evaluating the results of our work; and (ii) to evaluate the effect of any identified misstatements in the standalone financial statements.

We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.

We also provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards.

From the matters communicated with those charged with governance, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of standalone financial statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditor’s report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

9. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2016 (‘the Order’) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of Section 143(11) of the Act, we give in the Annexure I, a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.

10. As required by Section 143 (3) of the Act, we report that:

a. We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

b. In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books;

c. The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss including Other Comprehensive Income, Statement of Changes in Equity and the Statement of Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account;

d. In our opinion, the aforesaid standalone financial statements comply with the Ind AS specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014;

e. On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on 31st March 2019 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors are disqualified as on 31st March 2019 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164 (2) of the Act;

f. With respect to adequacy of internal financial controls over financial reporting of the Company and operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to our separate report given in Annexure II. Our report expresses an unmodified opinion on the adequacy and operating effectiveness of the Company’s internal financial controls over financial reporting;

g. With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor’s Report in accordance with the requirements of section 197(16) of the Act, as amended:

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the remuneration paid by the Company to its directors during the year is in accordance with the provisions of section 197 of the Act; and

h. With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor’s Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, as amended, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i. The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position in its standalone financial statements - Refer note 34 (i), 34 (ii), 34 (vi) and note 35 to the standalone financial statements; except certain claims made by the ex-employees whose services were terminated in earlier years and are not acknowledged as debts. The financial impact of these claims cannot be estimated. However in the opinion of the management, these claims are not tenable;

ii. The Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses and

iii. There has been no delay in transferring amounts required to be transferred to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.

ANNEXURE I TO THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31ST MARCH 2019

(Referred to in point 9 under the heading “Report on other legal and regulatory requirements” of our report of even date]

(i) In respect of fixed assets (property, plant and equipment and investment property):

(a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) The Company has a revised its program for verification of Fixed Assets to cover all the items of fixed assets in a phased manner which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. Pursuant to the revised program, certain fixed assets were physically verified by the management during the year. According to the information and explanations given to us, no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

(c) According to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of our examination of the records of the Company, the title deeds of immovable properties which are freehold are held in the name of the Company as at the balance sheet date. In respect of immovable properties of land that have been taken on lease and disclosed as Property, plant and equipment in the standalone financial statements, the lease agreements are in the name of the Company as at the balance sheet date.

(ii) The inventories have been physically verified during the year by the management, except for the inventories lying with the third parties as at balance sheet date, which have been confirmed by them. In our opinion, the frequency of such verification is reasonable. The discrepancies noticed on verification between the physical stocks and the book records were not material.

(iii) The Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to companies, firms, limited liability partnerships or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 189 of the Act. Therefore, the requirement of clause (iii)(a), (iii)(b) and (iii)(c) of paragraph 3 of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

(iv) The Company has complied with the provisions of Section 186 of the Act in respect of the investments made by the Company. Further, there are no loans, guarantees or securities given by the Company which are covered under section 186 of the Act. There are no transactions during the year which are covered under section 185 of the Act and therefore question of commenting on compliance of section 185 of the Act does not arise.

(v) In our opinion and according to the explanations given to us, the Company has not accepted any deposits. Therefore, question of reporting compliance with directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and the provisions of sections 73 to 76 or any other relevant provisions of the Act and rules framed there under does not arise. We are informed that no order relating to the Company has been passed by the Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any Court or any other Tribunal.

(vi) We have broadly reviewed the books of account and records maintained by the Company pursuant to the Companies (Cost Records and Audit) Rules, 2014 as prescribed by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under Section 148 (1) of the Act relating to the manufacture of drugs and pharmaceuticals and are of the opinion that, prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have, however, not made a detailed examination of the said records with a view to determine whether they are accurate or complete

(vii) In respect of statutory dues:

(a) According to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of our examination of records of the Company, in respect of amounts deducted / accrued in the books of account, the Company has been regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, employees’ state insurance, income-tax, goods and services tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value added tax, cess and any other statutory dues, as applicable to the Company, during the year with the appropriate authorities. There are no undisputed statutory dues payable in respect to (a) above statutes, outstanding as at 31st March 2019 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(b) According to information and explanations given to us and on the basis of our examination of the records of the Company, there is no disputed sales tax, goods and services tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise and value added tax as on 31st March, 2019 which have not been deposited except the following disputed dues which have not been deposited since the matters are pending with the relevant forum.

(Rs, in Lakhs)

Name of the Statutes

Nature of the dues

Disputed

amount

Amount paid in protest

Unpaid

amount

Period to which it relates

Forum where dispute is pending

The Income tax Act, 1961

TDS and Interest

3.19

-

3.19

2007-2018

In the process of filing rectification/ appeal

The Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008

Penalty

20.44

20.44

FY 2008-2009

Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

The Madhya Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2002

Entry Tax and Interest

10.94

2.73

8.21

FY 2015-16

Additional Commissioner of Commercial tax, Indore

Name of the Statutes

Nature of the dues

Disputed

amount

Amount paid in protest

Unpaid

amount

Period to which it relates

Forum where dispute is pending

The Central Excise Act, 1944

Duty and Penalty

201.24

83.46

117.78

April 2003 to November 2013

Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)-Mumbai

The Finance Act,

1944 (Service Tax)

Disallowance of Service Tax Credit & Penalty

504.96

29.00

475.96

FY 2008-09 to August 2015

Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)-Mumbai

The Finance Act,

1944 (Service Tax)

Disallowance of Service Tax Credit

219.00

16.81

202.19

September 2015 to June 2017

Commissioner of Central Tax (Appeals), Raigad

The Finance Act,

1944 (Service Tax)

Disallowance of Service Tax Credit & Penalty

139.88

5.24

134.64

January 2012 to March 2012

Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)-Kolkatta

The Central Excise Act, 1944

Disallowance of CENVAT Credit

41.42

3.10

38.32

FY 2011-12 to 2012-13

Commissioner ate (Appeal)- Siliguri

(viii) Based on our audit procedures and as per the information and explanations given by the management, we are of the opinion that the Company has not defaulted in repayment of loans or borrowings to banks during the year. The Company has not borrowed any money from financial institutions or debenture holders or Government.

(ix) During the year the Company did not raise any money by way of initial public offer or further public offer (including debt instruments) and term loans. Accordingly, clause (ix) of paragraph 3 of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

(x) During the course of our examination of the books of account and records of the Company, carried out in accordance with generally accepted auditing practices in India and according to information and explanation given to us, we have neither noticed nor have been informed by the management, any incidence of fraud by the Company or on the Company by its officers or employees.

(xi) According to the information and explanations given to us and based on our examination of the records, the Company has paid / provided for managerial remuneration in accordance with the requisite approvals mandated by the provisions of section 197 read with Schedule V to the Act.

(xii) The Company is not a Nidhi Company. Therefore, the provisions of clause (xii) of paragraph 3 of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

(xiii) According to the information and explanations given to us and based on our examination of the records, transactions with the related parties are in compliance with Section 177 and 188 of the Act where applicable and the details of such transactions have been disclosed in the standalone financial statements as required by the applicable Accounting Standards.

(xiv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not made any preferential allotment or private placement of shares or fully or partly convertible debentures during the year. Therefore, the provisions of clause (xiv) of paragraph 3 of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

(xv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, during the year, the Company has not entered into any non-cash transactions with directors or persons connected with the directors. Therefore, the provisions of clause (xv) of paragraph 3 of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

(xvi) The Company is not required to be registered under Section 45-lA of the Reserve Bank of lndia Act, 1934. Therefore, the provisions of the clause (xvi) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

ANNEXURE II TO THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 ST MARCH 2019

(Referred to in point 10f under the heading “Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements” of our Report of even date)

Report on the Internal Financial Controls under section 143(3)(i) of the Companies Act, 2013 (“the Act”)

Opinion

We have audited the internal financial controls over financial reporting of Unichem Laboratories Limited (“the Company”), as of 31st March, 2019, in conjunction with our audit of the standalone financial statements of the Company for the year ended on that date.

In our opinion, to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the Company has, in all material respects, an adequate internal financial controls system over financial reporting and such internal financial controls over financial reporting were operating effectively as at 31st March, 2019, based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.

Management’s Responsibility for Internal Financial Controls

The Company’s Board of Directors is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal financial controls based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting (“the Guidance Note”), issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. These responsibilities include the design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls that were operating effectively for ensuring the orderly and efficient conduct of its business, including adherence to company’s policies, the safeguarding of its assets, the prevention and detection of frauds and errors, the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, and the timely preparation of reliable financial information, as required under the Act.

Auditors’ Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company''s internal financial controls over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting (the “Guidance Note”) issued by ICAI and the and the Standards on Auditing prescribed under Section 143(10) of the Companies Act, 2013, to the extent applicable to an audit of internal financial controls with reference to financial statement. Those Standards and the Guidance Note require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether adequate internal financial controls over financial reporting was established and maintained and if such controls operated effectively in all material respects.

Our audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the adequacy of the internal financial controls system over financial reporting and their operating effectiveness. Our audit of internal financial controls over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal financial controls over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the standalone financial statements, whether due to fraud or error.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the internal financial controls system over financial reporting.

Meaning of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting

A company''s internal financial control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of standalone financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company''s internal financial control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of standalone financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company''s assets that could have a material effect on the standalone financial statements.

Inherent Limitations of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting

Because of the inherent limitations of internal financial controls over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of the internal financial controls over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the internal financial control over financial reporting may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

For N. A. Shah Associates LLP

Chartered Accountants

Firm registration number: 116560W/W100149

Milan Mody

Mumbai Partner

24th May, 2019 Membership number: 103286


Mar 31, 2018

Report on the standalone financial statements

We have audited the accompanying standalone financial statements of Unichem Laboratories Limited (“the Company”) which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 31st March 2018, the Statement of Profit and Loss (including Other Comprehensive Income), the Statement of Changes in Equity, and the Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended on that date, and a summary of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory information (hereinafter referred to as “standalone financial statements”).

Management’s responsibility for the standalone financial statements

The Company’s Board of Directors are responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 (“the Act”) with respect to the preparation of these standalone financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance including other comprehensive income, cash flows and changes in equity of the company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) prescribed under Section 133 of the Act.

This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the standalone financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor’s responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these standalone financial statements based on our audit.

We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made there under.

We conducted our audit of standalone financial statements in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under section 143(10) of the Act. Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the standalone financial statements are free of material misstatements.

An audit involves performing procedure to obtain evidence about the amount and the disclosures in the standalone financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the standalone financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant to the Company’s preparation of the Statement that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the standalone financial statement.

We believe that the audit evidence obtained by us is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on standalone financial statements.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid standalone financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs (financial position) of the Company as at 31st March 2018 and its profit (financial performance including other comprehensive income), its cash flows and changes in equity for the year ended on that date.

Other matters

a) The figures for the year ended 31st March 2017 are based on the annual financial statements that were audited by the erstwhile auditors whose report dated 30th May, 2017 expressed unmodified opinion.

b) As mentioned in note 46 of the standalone financial statements for the year ended 31st March 2018, during the year, the Company has transferred its domestic formulation business in India and Nepal (i.e. discontinued operations) to Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited. Accordingly the previous year figures are regrouped into continuing and discontinued operations. These regrouped previous year figures are prepared and certified by the Management.

Our opinion is not qualified in regard to the above matters.

Report on other legal and regulatory requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order, 2016 (‘the Order’) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of Section 143(11) of the Act, we give in the Annexure I, a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.

2. As required by Section 143 (3) of the Act, we report that:

a. We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

b. In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books;

c. The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss including Other Comprehensive Income, the Statement of Cash Flow and the Statement of Changes in Equity dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account;

d. In our opinion, the aforesaid standalone financial statements comply with the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act;

e. On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on 31st March, 2018 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors are disqualified as on 31st March, 2018 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164 (2) of the Act;

f. With respect to adequacy of internal financial controls system over financial reporting of the Company and operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to our separate report given in Annexure II; Our report expresses an unmodified opinion on the adequacy and operating effectiveness of the Company’s internal financial controls over financial reporting; and

g. With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor’s Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i. The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position in its standalone financial statements - Refer note 34 (i) & (v) and note 35 to the standalone financial statements; except certain claims made by the ex-employees whose services were terminated in earlier years and are not acknowledged as debts. The financial impact of these claims cannot be estimated. However in the opinion of the management, these claims are not tenable;

ii. The Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses;

iii. There has been no delay in transferring amounts required to be transferred to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.

ANNEXURE I TO THE INDEPENDENTS AUDITOR’S REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31ST MARCH 2018

(Referred to in paragraph 1 under, Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements section of our Report of even date)

(i) In respect of fixed assets (property, plant and equipment and investment property):

(a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) The Company has a program of verification to cover all the items of fixed assets in a phased manner which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. Pursuant to the program, certain fixed assets were physically verified by the management during the year. According to the information and explanations given to us, no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

(c) According to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of our examination of the records of the Company, the title deeds of immovable properties which are freehold are held in the name of the Company as at the balance sheet date. In respect of immovable properties of land that have been taken on lease and disclosed as Property, plant and equipment in the standalone financial statements, the lease agreements are in the name of the Company as at the balance sheet date.

(ii) The inventories have been physically verified during the year by the management, except for the inventories lying with the third parties as at balance sheet date, which have been confirmed by them. In our opinion, the frequency of such verification is reasonable. The discrepancies noticed on verification between the physical stocks and the book records were not material.

(iii) The Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to companies, firms, limited liability partnerships or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 189 of the Act. Therefore, the requirement of clause (iii)(a), (iii)(b) and (iii)(c) of paragraph 3 of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

(iv) The Company has complied with the provisions of Section 186 of the Act in respect of the investments made by the Company. Further, there are no loans, guarantees or securities given by the Company which are covered under section 186 of the Act. There are no transactions during the year which are covered under section 185 of the Act and therefore question of commenting on compliance of section 185 of the Act does not arise.

(v) In our opinion and according to the explanations given to us, the Company has not accepted any deposits. Therefore, question of reporting compliance with directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and the provisions of sections 73 to 76 or any other relevant provisions of the Act and rules framed there under does not arise. We are informed that no order relating to the Company has been passed by the Company law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any Court or any other Tribunal.

(vi) We have broadly reviewed the books of account and records maintained by the Company pursuant to the Companies (Cost Records and Audit) Rules, 2014 as prescribed by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under Section 148 (1) of the Act relating to the manufacture of drugs and pharmaceuticals and are of the opinion that, prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have, however, not made a detailed examination of the said records with a view to determine whether they are accurate or complete

(vii) In respect of statutory dues:

(a) According to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of our examination of records of the Company, in respect of amounts deducted / accrued in the books of account, the Company has been regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, employees’ state insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, goods and services tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value added tax, cess and any other statutory dues, as applicable to the Company, during the year with the appropriate authorities. There are no undisputed statutory dues payable in respect to above statutes, outstanding as at 31st March 2018 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(b) According to information and explanations given to us and on the basis of our examination of the records of the Company, there is no disputed sales tax, goods and services tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise and value added tax as on 31st March, 2018 which have not been deposited except the following disputed dues which have not been deposited since the matters are pending with the relevant forum:

Name of the Statutes

Nature of the dues

Disputed amount

Amount paid in protest

Unpaid amount

Period to which it relates

Forum where dispute is pending

The Income tax Act, 1961

TDS and Interest

41.50

-

41.50

2007-2017

In the process of filing rectification/ appeal

The Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008

Penalty

20.44

20.44

FY 2008-2009

Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

The Madhya Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2002

Entry Tax and Interest

10.94

2.73

8.21

FY 2015-16

Additional Commissioner of Commercial tax, Indore

The Central Excise Act, 1944

Duty and Penalty

215.95

86.93

129.02

April 2003 to November 2013

Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)-Mumbai

The Finance Act, 1944 (Service Tax)

Disallowance of Service Tax Credit & Penalty

498.22

22.57

475.65

FY 2008-09 to August 2015

Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)-Mumbai

The Finance Act,

1944 (Service Tax)

Disallowance of Service Tax Credit

82.55

82.55

September 2015 to May 2016

In the process of filing appeal to Commissioner of Central tax (Appeals)

The Finance Act,

1944 (Service Tax)

Disallowance of Service Tax Credit & Penalty

139.88

5.24

134.64

January 2012 to March 2012

Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)-Kolkatta

The Central Excise Act, 1944

Disallowance of CENVAT Credit

41.42

3.10

38.32

FY 2011-12 to 2012-13

Commissionerate (Appeal)- Siliguri

The Finance Act,

1944 (Service Tax)

Disallowance of Service Tax Credit

8.02

8.02

February 2016 to June 2017

Commissionerate (Appeal)- Siliguri

(viii) Based on our audit procedures and as per the information and explanations given by the management, we are of the opinion that the Company has not defaulted in repayment of loans or borrowings to banks during the year. The Company has not borrowed any money from financial institutions or debenture holders or Government.

(ix) During the year the Company did not raise any money by way of initial public offer or further public offer (including debt instruments) and term loans. Accordingly, clause (ix) of paragraph 3 of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

(x) During the course of our examination of the books of account and records of the Company, carried out in accordance with generally accepted auditing practices in India and according to information and explanation given to us, we have neither noticed nor have been informed by the management, any incidence of fraud by the Company or on the Company by its officers or employees.

(xi) According to the information and explanations given to us and based on our examination of the records, the Company has paid / provided for managerial remuneration in accordance with the requisite approvals mandated by the provisions of section 197 read with Schedule V to the Act.

(xii) The Company is not a Nidhi Company. Therefore, the provisions of clause (xii) of paragraph 3 of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

(xiii) According to the information and explanations given to us and based on our examination of the records, transactions with the related parties are in compliance with Section 177 and 188 of the Act where applicable and the details of such transactions have been disclosed in the standalone financial statements as required by the applicable Accounting Standards.

(xiv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not made any preferential allotment or private placement of shares or fully or partly convertible debentures during the year. Therefore, the provisions of clause (xiv) of paragraph 3 of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

(xv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, during the year, the Company has not entered into any non-cash transactions with directors or persons connected with the directors. Therefore, the provisions of clause (xv) of paragraph 3 of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

(xvi) The Company is not required to be registered under Section 45-lA of the Reserve Bank of lndia Act, 1934. Therefore, the provisions of the clause (xvi) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

ANNEXURE I TO THE INDEPENDENTS AUDITOR’S REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31ST MARCH 2018

(Referred to in paragraph 1 under, Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements section of our Report of even date)

Report on the Internal Financial Controls under section 143(3)(i) of the Act

We have audited the internal financial controls over financial reporting of Unichem Laboratories Limited (“the Company”), as of 31 st March, 2018, in conjunction with our audit of the Ind AS standalone financial statements of the Company for the year ended on that date.

Management’s Responsibility for Internal Financial Controls

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal financial controls based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting (the “Guidance Note”), issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. These responsibilities include the design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls that were operating effectively for ensuring the orderly and efficient conduct of its business, including adherence to company’s policies, the safeguarding of its assets, the prevention and detection of frauds and errors, the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, and the timely preparation of reliable financial information, as required under the Act.

Auditors’ Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal financial controls over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting (the “Guidance Note”) issued by ICAI and the and the Standards on Auditing prescribed under Section 143(10) of the Companies Act, 2013, to the extent applicable to an audit of internal financial controls with reference to financial statement. Those Standards and the Guidance Note require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether adequate internal financial controls over financial reporting was established and maintained and if such controls operated effectively in all material respects.

Our audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the adequacy of the internal financial controls system over financial reporting and their operating effectiveness. Our audit of internal financial controls over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal financial controls over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the standalone financial statements, whether due to fraud or error.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the internal financial controls system over financial reporting.

Meaning of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal financial control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of standalone financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal financial control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of standalone financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorisations of management and directors of the Company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorised acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the standalone financial statements.

Inherent Limitations of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting

Because of the inherent limitations of internal financial controls over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of the internal financial controls over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the internal financial control over financial reporting may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Opinion

In our opinion, the Company has, in all material respects, an adequate internal financial controls system over financial reporting and such internal financial controls over financial reporting were operating effectively as at 31st March, 2018, based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.

For N. A. Shah Associates LLP

Chartered Accountants

Firm registration number: 116560W/W100149

Milan Mody

Mumbai Partner

May 29, 2018 Membership number: 103286


Mar 31, 2017

Independent Auditors’ Report to the Members of Unichem Laboratories Limited

Report on the Standalone Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying standalone Ind AS financial statements of Unichem Laboratories Limited (“the Company”), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 31st March, 2017, and the Statement of Profit and Loss (including Other Comprehensive Income), the Cash Flow Statement and the Statement of Changes in Equity for the year then ended, and a summary of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management’s Responsibility for the Standalone Ind AS Financial Statements

The Company s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 (“the Act”) with respect to the preparation of these standalone I nd AS financial statements that give a true and fair view of the state of affairs (financial position), profit or loss (financial performance including other comprehensive income), cash flows and changes in equity of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) prescribed under Section 133 of the Act.

This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the standalone Ind AS financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor’s Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these standalone Ind AS financial statements based on our audit.

We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made there under.

We conducted our audit of the standalone Ind AS financial statements in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the standalone Ind AS financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the standalone Ind AS financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the standalone Ind AS financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant to the Company s preparation of the standalone Ind AS financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Company s Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the standalone Ind AS financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the standalone Ind AS financial statements.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid standalone Ind AS financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India including the Ind AS, of the state of affairs (financial position) of the Company as at 31st March, 2017, and its profit (financial performance including other comprehensive income), its cash flows and the changes in equity for the year ended on that date.

Emphasis of Matter

We draw attention to Note 41 to the standalone Ind AS financial statements relating to increase in the provision for diminution of long-term investments in Unichem Farmaceutica Do Brazil Ltda, from Rs. 2,277.63 lacs in the previous year to Rs. 2690.78 lacs for the year under report, based on internal assessment and other factors more elaborately stated in the said Note.

Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter.

Other Matters

The comparative financial information of the Company for the year ended 31st March 2016 and the transition date opening balance sheet as at 1st April 2015 included in these standalone Ind AS financial statements, are based on the previously issued statutory financial statements prepared in accordance with the Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2006 audited by us whose report for the year ended 31st March 2016 and 31st March 2015 dated 20th May 2016 and 9th May 2015, respectively expressed an unmodified opinion on those standalone financial statements, as adjusted for the differences in the accounting principles adopted by the Company on transition to the Ind AS, which have been audited by us.

Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor s Report) Order, 2016 (“the Order”), issued by the Central Government in terms of section 143 (11) of the Act, we give in “Annexure A” a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.

2. As required by Section 143 (3) of the Act, we report that:

(a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit.

(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books.

(c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss, the Cash Flow Statement and Statement of Changes in Equity dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account.

(d) In our opinion, the aforesaid standalone Ind AS financial statements comply with the Indian Accounting Standards prescribed under Section 133 of the Act.

(e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on 31st March, 2017 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March, 2017 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164 (2) of the Act.

(f) With respect to the adequacy of the internal financial controls over financial reporting of the Company and the operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to our separate Report in “Annexure B”.

(g) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor s Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i. the Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position in its standalone Ind AS financial statements - Refer Note no 36 and 37 to the standalone Ind AS financial statements;

ii. the Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses.

iii. there has been no delay in transferring amounts, required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.

iv. the Company has provided requisite disclosures in the financial statements as to holdings as well as dealings in Specified Bank Notes during the period from 8th November, 2016 to 30th December, 2016. Based on audit procedures and relying on the management representation we report that the disclosures are in accordance with books of account maintained by the Company and as produced to us by the Management - Refer Note 54 to the standalone Ind AS financial statements;

ANNEXURE A TO THE AUDITOR’S REPORT

(Referred to in paragraph 1 under, Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements section of Independent Auditors'' Report on standalone Ind AS financial statements of even date)

(I) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets;

(b) As explained to us, some of the fixed assets of the Company have been physically verified during the year by the management in accordance with a phased program of verification designed to cover all assets over a period of three years, which in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.

(c) According to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of our examination of the records of the Company, the title deeds of immovable properties other than self constructed immovable properties (buildings) are held in the name of the Company.

(ii) As explained to us, the inventories have been physically verified during the year by the management, except for the inventories lying with the third parties, which have however, been confirmed by them. The intervals at which the inventories have been verified are, in our opinion, reasonable in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business. The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.

(iii) As informed, the Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to companies, firms, Limited Liability Partnerships or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 189 of the Act. Consequently, sub clause (a), (b) and (c) of the paragraph 3 (iii) are not applicable to the Company.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has complied with the provisions of Section 185 and 186 of the Act, in respect of loans, investments, guarantees, and security given for the year under report.

(v) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not accepted deposits from the public during the year. Therefore, paragraph 3(v) of the Order is not applicable.

(vi) We have broadly reviewed the books of account and records maintained by the Company pursuant to the Companies (Cost Records and Audit) Rules, 2014 as prescribed by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under Section 148 (1) of the Act relating to the manufacture of Bulk Drugs and pharmaceutical specialties and are of the opinion that, prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have, however, not made a detailed examination of the said records with a view to determine whether they are accurate or complete.

(vii) (a) According to information and explanations given to us and on the basis of our examination of the records of the Company, amounts deducted / accrued in the books of account in respect of undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, employees state insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value added tax, cess and other material statutory dues have been regularly deposited during the year by the Company with the appropriate authorities. As explained to us, there were no undisputed statutory dues as mentioned above in arrears as at 31st March, 2017 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, the dues in respect of income tax (including TDS), sales tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise and value added tax that have not been deposited with the appropriate authorities on account of dispute and the forum where the disputes are pending as on 31st March, 2017 are as given below:

Name of the Statutes

Nature of the dues

Amount in lacs)

Period to which it relates

Forum where dispute is pending

Income Tax Act, 1961

TDS

25.34

AY: 2008-09 to AY: 2009-10

Commissioner of Income Tax - (Appeals)

U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008

Penalty

20.44

FY: 2008-09

Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Central Excise Act, 1944

Duty and Penalty

211.30

April 2003 to November 2013

Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)

Central Excise Act, 1944

Duty and Penalty

4.09

FY: 2012-13

Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeal)

Service Tax Laws

Disallowance of Service Tax Credit

6.39

April 2011 to June 2015

Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeal), Kolkata - III

Service Tax Laws

Disallowance of Service Tax Credit & Penalty

139.88

January 2012 to March 2012

Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)

Service Tax Laws

Disallowance of Service Tax Credit & Penalty

498.22

FY: 2008-09 to August 2015

Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)

Service Tax Laws

Disallowance of Service Tax Credit & Penalty

54.31

February 2014 to August 2016

Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax - Goa

(viii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to financial institutions, banks and Governments. Therefore, paragraph 3(viii) of the Order is not applicable.

(ix) The Company did not raise any money by way of initial public offer or further public offer (including debt instruments). Term loans have been applied for the purposes for which they were obtained except in case of term loans amounting to Rs. 1.80 lacs disbursed but pending utilization, which were placed in a separate bank account.

(x) To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information and explanations given to us, no material fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.

(xi) According to the information and explanations given to us and based on our examination of the records of the Company, the Company has paid/provided for managerial remuneration in accordance with the requisite approvals mandated by the provisions of section 197 read with Schedule V to the Act.

(xii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company is not a nidhi company. Therefore, paragraph 3(xii) of the Order is not applicable.

(xiii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, and based on our examination of the records of the Company, all transactions with the related parties are in compliance with sections 177 and 188 of the Act, where applicable and the details have been disclosed in the financial statements etc., as required by the applicable accounting standards.

(xiv) According to the information and explanations given to us and based on our examination of the records of the Company, no preferential allotment or private placement of shares or fully or partly convertible debentures has been made by the Company during the year under review. Therefore, paragraph 3(xiv) of the Order is not applicable.

(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us and based on our examination of the records of the Company, the Company has not entered into any non-cash transactions with directors or persons connected with him as specified under section 192 of the Act. Therefore, paragraph 3(xv) of the Order is not applicable.

(xvi) The Company is not required to be registered under section 45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 and therefore the provisions of paragraph 3(xvi) of the Order is not applicable.

For B. D. Jokhakar & Co.

Chartered Accountants

Firm Registration No.: 104345W

Raman H. Jokhakar

Mumbai Partner

May 30, 2017 Membership No.: 103241


Mar 31, 2016

We have audited the accompanying standalone financial statements of Unichem Laboratories Limited ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 31 st March, 2016, the Statement of Profit and Loss, the Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management''s Responsibility for the Standalone Financial Statements

The Company''s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act") with respect to the preparation of these standalone financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding of the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor''s Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these standalone financial statements based on our audit.

We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made thereunder.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant to the Company''s preparation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Company''s Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the standalone financial statements.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid standalone financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31st March, 2016, and its profit and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Emphasis of Matter

We draw attention to Note 34 to the standalone financial statements relating to increase in the provision for diminution of long-term investments in Unichem Farmaceutica Do Brazil Ltda, from Rs. 434.50 lacs in the previous year to Rs. 2,277.63 lacs for the year under report, based on internal assessment and other factors more elaborately stated in the said Note.

Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2016 ("the Order"), issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (11) of section 143 of the Act, we give in the Annexure A, a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.

2. As required by Section 143 (3) of the Act, we report that:

a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and beliefwere necessary for the purposes of our audit.

(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books.

(c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account.

(d) In our opinion, the aforesaid standalone financial statements comply with the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014.

(e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on 31 st March, 2016 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31 st March, 2016 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164 (2) of the Act.

(f) With respect to the adequacy of the internal financial controls over financial reporting of the Company and the operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to our separate Report in "Annexure B".

(g) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor''s Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i. the Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position in its financial statements - Refer Note no 29 and 30 to the financial statements;

ii. the Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses.

iii. there has been no delay in transferring amounts, required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.

(Referred to in paragraph 1 under ''Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements'' section of Independent

Auditors'' Report on standalone financial statements of even date)

(I) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets;

(b) As explained to us, some of the fixed assets of the Company have been physically verified during the year by the management in accordance with a phased program of verification designed to cover all assets over a period of three years, which in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.

(c) According to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of our examination of the records of the Company, the title deeds of immovable properties are held in the name of the Company.

(ii) As explained to us, the inventories have been physically verified during the year by the management, except for the inventories lying with the third parties, which have however, been confirmed by them. The intervals at which the inventories have been verified are, in our opinion, reasonable in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business. The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.

(iii) As informed, the Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to companies, firms, Limited Liability Partnerships or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 189 of the Act. Consequently, sub clause (a), (b) and (c) of the paragraph 3 (ii) are not applicable to the Company.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has complied with the provisions of Section 185 and 186 of the Act, in respect of loans, investments, guarantees, and security given for the year underreport.

(v) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not accepted deposits from the public during the year. Therefore, paragraph 3(v) of the Order is not applicable.

(vi) We have broadly reviewed the books of account and records maintained by the Company pursuant to the Companies (Cost Records and Audit) Rules, 2014 as prescribed by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under Section 148 (1) of the Act relating to the manufacture of Bulk Drugs and pharmaceutical specialties and are of the opinion that, prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have, however, not made a detailed examination of the said records with a view to determine whether they are accurate or complete.

(vii) (a) According to information and explanations given to us and onthe basis of our examination of the records of the Company, amounts deducted / accrued in the books of account in respect of undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, employees'' state insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value added tax, cess and other material statutory dues have been regularly deposited during the year by the Company with the appropriate authorities. As explained to us, there were no undisputed statutory dues as mentioned above in arrears as at 31 st March, 2016 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, the dues in respect of income tax (including TDS), sales tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise and value added tax that have not been deposited with the appropriate authorities on account of dispute and the forum where the disputes are pending as on 31 st March, 2016 are as given below:

Name of the Nature of Amount Period to which Forum where

Statutes the dues (Rs. in lacs) it relates dispute is pending

Income Tax TDS 31.04 AY: 2008-09 Commissioner of Act, 1961 to AY: 2009-10 Income Tax - (Appeals)

U.P. Value Added Penalty 20.44 FY: 2008-09 Hon''ble High Court of Tax Act, 2008 Judicature at Allahabad

Central Excise Duty and 119.38 FY: 2003-2004 Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) Act, 1944 Penalty to 2008-2009

Central Excise Duty and 11.05 FY: 2007-08 Commissioner of Central Act, 1944 Penalty to FY: 2009-10, Excise (Appeal)

FY: 2011-12

Service Tax Disallo wance of 12.06 FY: 2005-06 Appellate Tribunal

Laws Service Tax Credit to FY: 2010- 11 (CESTAT), New Delhi

Service Tax Disall- owance of 6.38 FY: 2011-12 Commissioner of Central

Laws Service Tax to FY: 2015- 16 Excise (Appe- al), Kolkata - III Credit & Penalty

Service Tax Disall- owance of 139.87 January 2012 Appellate Tri- bunal(CESTAT)

Laws Service Tax to March 2012 Credit & Penalty

Service Tax Disall- owance of 10.58 FY: 2007-08 Appellate Tri- bunal(CESTAT)

Laws Service Tax to FY: 2010- 11 Credit & Penalty

Service Tax Disallo- wance of 373.77 FY: 2008-09 Appellate Tri- bunal(CESTAT)

Laws Service Tax to FY: 2012- 13 Credit & Penalty

(viii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to financial institutions, banks and Governments. Therefore, paragraph 3(viii) of the Order is not applicable.

(ix) The Company did not raise any money by way of initial public offer or further public offer (including debt instruments). Term loans have been applied for the purposes for which they were obtained except in case of term loans amounting to Rs. 29.36 lacs disbursed but pending utilisation, which were placed in a separate bank account.

(x) To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information and explanations given to us, no material fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.

(xi) According to the information and explanations given to us and based on our examination of the records of the Company, the Company has paid/provided for managerial remuneration in accordance with the requisite approvals mandated by the provisions of section 197 read with Schedule V to the Act.

(xii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company is not a nidhi company. Therefore, paragraph 3(xii) of the Order is not applicable.

(xiii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, and based on our examination of the records of the Company, all transactions with the related parties are in compliance with sections 177 and 188 of the Act, where applicable and the details have been disclosed in the financial statements etc., as required by the applicable accounting standards.

(xiv) According to the information and explanations given to us and based on our examination of the records of the Company, no preferential allotment or private placement of shares or fully or partly convertible debentures has been made by the Company during the year under review. Therefore, paragraph 3(xiv) of the Order is not applicable.

(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us and based on our examination of the records of the Company, the Company has not entered into any non-cash transactions with directors or persons connected with him as specified under section 192 of the Act. Therefore, paragraph 3(xv) of the Order is not applicable.

(xvi) The Company is not required to be registered under section 45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 and therefore the provisions of paragraph 3(xvi) of the Order is not applicable.

For B. D. Jokhakar & Co.

Chartered Accountants Firm Registration No.: 104345W

Raman H. Jokhakar

Mumbai Partner

May 20, 2016 Membership No.: 103241


Mar 31, 2015

We have audited the accompanying standalone financial statements of Unichem Laboratories Limited ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 31 st March, 2015, the Statement of Profit and Loss, the Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management’s Responsibility for the Standalone Financial Statements

The Company''s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act") with respect to the preparation of these standalone financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor’s Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these standalone financial statements based on our audit.

We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made thereunder.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant to the Company''s preparation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on whether the Company has in place an adequate internal financial controls system over financial reporting and the operating effectiveness of such controls. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Company''s Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the standalone financial statements.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid standalone financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31st March, 2015, and its profit and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2015 ("the Order"), issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (11) of section 143 of the Act, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order, to the extent applicable.

2. As required by Section 143 (3) of the Act, we report that:

(a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit.

(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books.

(c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account.

(d) In our opinion, the aforesaid standalone financial statements comply with the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014.

(e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on 31st March, 2015 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March, 2015 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164 (2) of the Act.

(f) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor''s Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i. the Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position in its financial statements - Refer Note no 29 and 30 to the financial statements;

ii. the Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses.

iii. There has been no delay in transferring amounts, required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.

ANNEXURE TO THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR''S REPORT (Referred to in paragraph under Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements'' section of our Report of even date)

(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets; (b) As explained to us, some of the fixed assets of the Company have been physically verified during the year by the management in accordance with a phased program of verification designed to cover all assets over a period of three years, which in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.

(ii) (a) As explained to us, the inventories have been physically verified during the year by the management, except for the inventories lying with the third parties, which have however, been confirmed by them. The intervals at which the inventories have been verified are, in our opinion, reasonable in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business;

(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management were reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.

(iii) As informed, the Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013. Consequently, sub clause (a) and (b) are not applicable to the Company for the year under report. (iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there is no continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in such internal control systems. (v) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not accepted deposits from the public during the year. Therefore, the provisions of clause 3(v) of the Order are not applicable to the Company. (vi) We have broadly reviewed the books of account and records maintained by the Company pursuant to the Companies (Cost Records and Audit) Rules, 2014 as prescribed by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under Section 148 (1) of the Act relating to the manufacture of Bulk Drugs and pharmaceutical specialties and are of the opinion that, prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have, however, not made a detailed examination of the said records with a view to determine whether they are accurate or complete. (vii) (a) The Company is regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues payable in respect of including provident fund, employees'' state insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, wealth tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value added tax, cess and other material statutory dues applicable to it with the appropriate authorities during the year. There were no undisputed statutory dues as mentioned above in arrears as at 31st March, 2015 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable. (b) According to the information and explanations given to us, the dues in respect of income tax (including TDS), sales tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise and value added tax that have not been deposited with the appropriate authorities on account of dispute and the forum where the disputes are pending as on J 31st March, 2015 are as given below:

Name of the Nature of Amount Period to which Statutes the dues (Rs. in lacs) it relates

Income Tax TDS 401.85 AY: 2008-09 Act, 1961 to AY: 2010-11

Income Tax Penalty 190.18 AY: 2001-02 to Act, 1961 AY: 2004-05, AY: 2006-07 and AY: 2008-09

Central Sales CST 36.17 FY: 2010-11 Tax Act, 1956

U.P. Value Penalty 20.44 FY: 2008-09 Added Tax Act, 2008

Central Excise Duty and 120.91 FY: 2003-2004 Act, 1944 Penalty to 2008-2009

Central Excise Duty and 7.77 FY: 2007-08 to Act, 1944 Penalty FY: 2009-10, FY: 2011-12 to FY: 2013-14

Service Tax Disallowance 12.06 FY: 2005-06 to Laws of Service Tax FY: 2010-11 Credit

Service Tax Disallowance of 56.56 FY: 2005-06 Laws Service Tax Credit & Penalty

Service Tax Disallowance of 2.97 FY: 2011-12 to Laws Service Tax FY: 2013-14 Credit & Penalty

Service Tax Disallowance of 139.87 January 2012 to Laws Service Tax March 2012 Credit & Penalty

Service Tax Disallowance of 5.29 FY: 2007-08 to Laws Service Tax FY: 2010-11 Credit & Penalty

Service Tax Disallowance of 188.74 FY: 2008-09 Laws Service Tax to FY: 2012-13 Credit & Penalty upto August 2012

Name of the Statute Forum where dispute is pending

Income Tax Act, 1961 Commissioner of Income Tax – (Appeals)

Income Tax Act, 1961 Commissioner of Income Tax – (Appeals)

Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 Appellate Deputy Commissioner of Commercial tax, Ratlam

U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008 Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Central Excise Act, 1944 Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)

Central Excise Act, 1944 Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeal)

Service Tax Laws Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi

Service Tax Laws Additional Commissioner, Central Excise, Indore

Service Tax Laws Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeal), Kolkata – III

Service Tax Laws Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)

Service Tax Laws Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)

Service Tax Laws Commissioner (Appeals)

(c) According to the information and explanations given to us, the amounts which were required to be transferred to the investor education and protection fund in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) and rules there under has been transferred to such fund within time. (viii) The Company does not have any accumulated losses at the end of the financial year and it has not incurred any cash losses in the current or in the immediately preceding financial year. Therefore, the provisions of clause 1 3(viii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company. | (ix) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to financial institutions and banks. Therefore, the provisions of clause 3 (ix) of the Order are not applicable to the Company. (x) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, having regard to the fact that the Subsidiaries are wholly owned, the terms and conditions of the guarantee given by the Company for loans taken by the Subsidiary from banks and financial institutions are not, prima facie, prejudicial to the interest of the Company. (xi) The Company has obtained term loan during the year which is to be utilised on or before October 2016 and as informed to us the said term loan is not utilised as on the date of the balance sheet.

(xii) To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information and explanations given to us, no material fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.

For B. D. Jokhakar & Co. Chartered Accountants Firm Registration No.: 104345W

Raman H. Jokhakar Mumbai Partner May 9, 2015 Membership No.: 103241


Mar 31, 2014

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Unichem Laboratories Limited ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 31st March, 2014, and the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management''s responsibility for the Financial Statement

Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act") read with the General Circular 15/2013 dated 13 September 2013 of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs in respect of Section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013. This responsibility includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor''s Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Company''s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity''s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

i) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31st March, 2014;

ii) in the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the profit for the year ended on that date; and

iii) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 ("the Order"), as amended, issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Act, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said order.

2. As required by section 227(3) of the Act, we report that:

(a) we have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

(b) in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

(c) the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

(d) in our opinion the balance sheet, statement of profit and loss and cash flow statement comply with the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 read with the General Circular 15/2013 dated 13 September 2013 of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs in respect of Section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013; and

(e) on the basis of the written representations received from the Directors, as on March 31st, 2014 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the Directors is disqualified as on March 31st, 2014 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;

ANNEXURE TO THE AUDITORS'' REPORT

(Referred to in paragraph under ''Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements'' section of our report of even date)

i. (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) As explained to us, some of the fixed assets of the Company have been physically verified during the year by the management in accordance with a phased program of verification designed to cover all assets over a period of three years, which in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. The discrepancies noticed on such verification were not material and have been properly dealt with in the books of account.

(c) The fixed assets disposed off during the year, in our opinion, constitute a substantial part of the fixed assets of the Company however such disposal has not affected the going concern status of the Company.

ii. (a) As explained to us, the inventories have been physically verified during the year by the management, except for the inventories lying with the third parties, which have however, been confirmed by them. The intervals at which the inventories have been verified are, in our opinion, reasonable in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business;

(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management were reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of the business.

(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.

iii. (a) As informed, the Company has not granted any Loans, secured or unsecured to companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Consequently, sub clause (b), (c) and (d) are not applicable. (e) The Company has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured from companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Consequently, sub clauses (f) and (g) are not applicable.

iv. In our opinion, and according to the information and explanation given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there is no continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in such internal control systems.

v. (a) To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to information and explanations given to us and on examination of records the particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to in section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been entered in the register maintained under that Section.

(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or arrangements are specialised in nature and comparable prices are not always determinable and the prices charged are prima facie reasonable. vi. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not accepted deposits from the public during the year. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(vi) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

vii. In our opinion, the internal audit system is commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of its business.

viii. We have broadly reviewed the books of account and records maintained by the Company pursuant to the Companies (Cost Accounting Records) Rules, 2011 as prescribed by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under Section 209 (1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 relating to the manufacture of Bulk Drugs and pharmaceutical specialties and are of the opinion that, prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been maintained. We have, however, not made a detailed examination of the said records with a view to determine whether they are accurate or complete.

ix. (a) The Company is regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues payable in respect of provident fund, investor education and protection fund, employees'' state insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, wealth tax, custom duty, excise duty, cess and any other material statutory dues with the appropriate authorities during the year. There were no undisputed statutory dues as mentioned above in arrears as at 31st March, 2014 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(b) According to the information & explanations given to us, the dues in respect of Income Tax (including TDS), Service Tax, Excise duty, Custom duty & Provident Fund that have not been deposited with the appropriate authorities on account of dispute and the forum where the disputes are pending as on 31st March, 2014 are as given below:

Name of the Nature of Amount Period to which Forum where Statutes the dues (Rs. in lacs) it relates dispute is pending

Income Tax TDS 31.04 AY: 2008-09 and Commissioner of Act, 1961 AY: 2009-10 Income Tax - (Appeals)

Income Tax Penalty 190.18 AY: 2001-02 to Commissioner of Act, 1961 AY: 2004-05, Income Tax - (Appeals) AY: 2006-07 and AY: 2008-09

Central Sales CST 36.17 FY:2010-11 Appellate Deputy Commissioner Tax Act, 1956 of Commercial Tax, Ratlam

U.P. VAT Penalty 20.44 FY: 2008-09 Hon''ble High Court Act, 2008 of Judicature at Allahabad

Central Excise Duty and 95.29 April, 2003 Commissioner of Central Act, 1944 Penalty to Excise (Appeal), Mumbai-II

February, 2005

Central Excise Duty and 39.58 FY: 2007-08 to Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) Act, 1944 Penalty FY: 2008-09, and FY: 2009-10 (Up to Dec, 2009)

Service Disallow ance 12.06 FY: 2006-07 to Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Tax Laws of Service FY: 2010-11 New Delhi Tax Credit

Service Disallow ance 56.56 FY: 2005-06 Additional Commissioner, Tax Laws of Service Central Excise, Indore Tax Credit and Penalty

Service Disallowance 2.55 FY: 2011-12 to Commissioner of Central Tax Laws of Service FY: 2012-13 Excise (Appeal), Kolkata – III Tax Credit and Penalty

Provident Fund Provident 1.75 FY: 2005-06 Hon''ble High Court of & Miscellan eous Fund Dues Madhya Pradesh, Indore Bench Provision Act, 1952

x. The Company does not have any accumulated losses at the end of the financial year and it has not incurred any cash losses in the current or in the immediately preceding financial year. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(x) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xi. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to banks and financial institutions. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xi) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xii. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xiii. The Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi mutual benefit fund /society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of the order are not applicable to the Company.

xiv. As informed to us, the Company is not dealing in or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the order are not applicable to the Company.

xv. In our opinion and according to the information & explanations given to us, having regard to the fact that the Subsidiary is wholly owned, the terms and conditions of the guarantee given by the Company for loans taken by the Subsidiary from banks and financial institutions are not, prima facie, prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

xvi. To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information and explanations given to us the Company did not have any term loans outstanding during the year.

xvii. According to the cash flow statement and other records examined by us and the information and explanations given to us, on an overall basis, funds raised on short term basis, have prima facie, not been used during the year for long term investments.

xviii. According to the information and explanations given to us no preferential allotment of shares has been made by the Company to companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

xix. The Company has not issued any secured debentures. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xix) of the order are not applicable to the Company.

xx. The Company has not raised any money through a public issue during the year. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xx) of the order are not applicable to the Company.

xxi. To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information and explanations given to us, no material fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.



For B. D. Jokhakar & Co.

Chartered Accountants Firm Registration No.: 104345W



Raman Jokhakar

Mumbai Partner

May 10, 2014 Membership No.: 103241


Mar 31, 2012

1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Unichem Laboratories Limited as at 31st March, 2012, the Statement of Profit and Loss and also the Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatements. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

3. As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 (as amended) ('the order') issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraph 4 & 5 of the said order.

4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 3 above, we report that:

a) We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books;

c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

d) In our opinion the Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss and the Cash Flow statement dealt with by this report comply with the Accounting Standards referred to in sub -section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956.

e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors, as on 31st March, 2012 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31st, 2012 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.

f) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said Financial statements, read with the notes thereon give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956 in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

i. in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31st March, 2012 ;

ii. in the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the profit for the year ended on that date; and

iii. in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

ANNEXURE REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH 3 OF OUR REPORT OF EVEN DATE

i. (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) As explained to us, some of the fixed assets of the Company have been physically verified during the year by the management in accordance with a phased program of verification designed to cover all assets over a period of three years, which in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. The discrepancies noticed on such verification were not material and have been properly dealt with in the books of account.

(c) The fixed assets disposed off during the year, in our opinion, do not constitute a substantial part of the fixed assets of the Company and such disposal has, not affected the going concern status of the Company.

ii. (a) As explained to us, the inventories have been physically verified during the year by the management, except for the inventories lying with the third parties, which have however, been confirmed by them. The intervals at which the inventories have been verified are, in our opinion, reasonable in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business;

(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management were reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of the business.

(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.

iii. (a) As informed, the company has not granted any Loans, secured or unsecured to companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Consequently, sub clause (b), (c) and (d) are not applicable. (e) The Company has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured from companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Consequently, sub clauses (f) and (g) are not applicable. iv. In our opinion, and according to the information and explanation given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there is no continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in such internal control systems. v. (a) To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to information and explanations given to us and on examination of records the particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to in section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been entered in the register maintained under that Section. (b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or arrangements are specialised in nature and comparable prices are not always determinable and the prices charged are prima facie reasonable. vi. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not accepted deposits from the public during the year. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(vi) of the Order are not applicable to the Company. vii. In our opinion, the internal audit system is commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

viii. We have broadly reviewed the books of account and records maintained by the Company pursuant to the Companies (Cost Accounting Records) Rules, 2011 as prescribed by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under Section 209 (1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 relating to the manufacture of Bulk drugs and pharmaceutical specialties and are of the opinion that, prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been maintained. We have, however, not made a detailed examination of the said records with a view to determine whether they are accurate or complete.

ix. (a) The Company is regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues payable in respect of provident fund, investor education and protection fund, employees' state insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, wealth tax, custom duty, excise duty, cess and any other material statutory dues with the appropriate authorities during the year. There were no undisputed statutory dues as mentioned above in arrears as at 31st March, 2012 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable. (b) According to the information & explanations given to us, the dues in respect of Income Tax (including TDS), Service Tax, Excise duty, Custom duty & Provident Fund that have not been deposited with the appropriate authorities on account of dispute and the forum where the disputes are pending as on 31st March, 2012 are as given below:

Name of the Nature of Amount Period to which Forum where Statutes the dues (Rs.in lacs) it relates dispute is pending

Income Tax TDS 478.00 A.Y. 2006-07 to Commissioner of Act, 1961 A.Y. 2010-11 Income - Tax (Appeals)

Income Tax Income tax 325.18 AY 2001-02 to Commissioner of Act, 1961 Penalty AY 2004-05 Income - Tax (Appeals) & AY 2006-07 to AY 2008-09

Central Excise Central Excise 11.62 AY 2004-05 Appellate Tribunal(CESTAT), Act, 1944 Penalty Principal Bench, New Delhi

Service Tax Disallowances 40.34 AY 2006-07 to Appellate Trib -unal (CESTAT), Rules, 1994 of Service AY 2011-12 New Delhi Tax Credit

Provident Fund Provident 1.75 AY 2006-07 Regional Prov -ident Fund & Miscellan -eous Fund Dues Commissioner, Indore Provision Act, 1952

x. The Company does not have any accumulated losses at the end of the financial year and it has not incurred any cash losses in the current or in the immediately preceding financial year.

xi. According to the information and explanations given to us the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to banks and financial institutions.

xii. According to the information and explanations given to us the Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xiii. The Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi mutual benefit fund /society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of the order are not applicable to the Company.

xiv. As informed to us, the Company is not dealing in or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xv. In our opinion and according to the information & explanations given to us, having regard to the fact that the Subsidiary is wholly owned, the terms and conditions of the guarantee given by the Company for loans taken by the Subsidiary from banks and financial institutions are not, prima facie, prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

xvi. To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information and explanations given to us the Company did not have any term loans outstanding during the year.

xvii. According to the cash flow statement and other records examined by us and the information and explanations given to us, on an overall basis, funds raised on short term basis, have prima facie, not been used during the year for long term investments.

xviii. According to the information and explanations given to us no preferential allotment of shares has been made by the Company to companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

xix. The Company has not issued any secured debentures and accordingly the provisions of clause 4(xix) of the Order are not applicable.

xx. The Company has not raised any money through a public issue during the year and accordingly the provisions of clause 4(xx) of the Order are not applicable.

xxi. To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information and explanations given to us, no material fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.

For B. D. Jokhakar & Co.

Chartered Accountants

Firm Registration No. 104345W

Raman Jokhakar Mumbai Partner

August 11, 2012 Membership No. 103241


Mar 31, 2011

1. We have audited the attached balance sheet of Unichem Laboratories Limited as at 31st March, 2011, the profit & loss account and also the cash flow statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statements presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 (as amended) (the order) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraph 4 & 5 of the said order.

4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 3 above, we report that:

(a) We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

(c) The balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash flow statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

(d) In our opinion the balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash flow statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting standards referred to in sub -section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors, as on 31st March, 2011 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March, 2011 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(f) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said financial statements, read with the notes thereon give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956 in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

i) in the case of the balance sheet of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31st March, 2011;

ii) in the case of the profit and loss account, of the profit for the year ended on that date; and

iii) in the case of cash flow statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Annexure referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date

1. (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) As explained to us, some of the fixed assets of the Company have been physically verified during the year by the management in accordance with a phased program of verification designed to cover all assets over a period of three years, which in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. The discrepancies noticed on such verification were not material and have been properly dealt with in the books of account.

(c) The fixed assets disposed off during the year, in our opinion, do not constitute a substantial part of the fixed assets of the Company and such disposal has, not affected the going concern status of the Company.

2. (a) As explained to us, the inventories have been physically verified during the year by the management.

The intervals at which the inventories have been verified are, in our opinion, reasonable in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business;

(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management were reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of the business.

(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.

3. (a) As informed, the Company has not granted any Loans, secured or unsecured to companies, firms or

other parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, sub clause (b), (c) and (d) are not applicable. (e) The Company has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured from companies, firms or other parties

covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Consequently, sub clauses (e), (f) and (g) are not applicable.

4. In our opinion, and according to the information and explanation given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there is no continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in such internal control systems.

5. (a) To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to information and explanations given to us and

on examination of records the particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to in section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been entered in the register maintained under that section. (b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, transactions made in

pursuance of such contracts or arrangements are specialised in nature and comparable prices are not always determinable and the prices charged are prima facie reasonable.

6. In our opinion, and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has complied with the provisions of section 58A, 58AA or any relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the rules framed there under and the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India, where applicable, with regard to the deposits accepted from the public. We have been informed that no order has been passed by Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any Court or any other Tribunal.

7. In our opinion, the internal audit system is commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

8. We have broadly reviewed the books of account and records maintained by the Company pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under section 209 (1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 relating to the manufacture of Bulk drugs and pharmaceutical specialties and are of the opinion that, prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been maintained. We have, however, not made a detailed examination of the said records with a view to determine whether they are accurate or complete.

9. (a) The Company is regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues payable in respect of provident fund,

investor education and protection fund, employees state insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, wealth tax, custom duty, excise duty, cess and any other material statutory dues with the appropriate authorities during the year. There were no undisputed statutory dues as mentioned above in arrears as at 31st March, 2011 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable. (b) According to the information & explanations given to us, the dues in respect of Excise duty and Service

tax and Provident Fund that have not been deposited with the appropriate authorities on account of dispute and the forum where the disputes are pending as on 31st March, 2011 are as given below:

Name of the Nature of Amount Forum where Period to which Statutes the dues (Rs. in lacs) dispute is pending it relates

Central Excise Penalty 11.61 Appellate Tribunal 2003-04 Act, 1944 (CESTAT), Northen Bench, New Delhi

Provident Fund Dues under 1.75 Regional Provident Fund 2005-06 & Misc. Prov. Provident Commissioner, Indore Act, 1952 Fund

Central Excise Cenvat Credit 43.13 Commissioner (Appeals), 2005-06 to Act, 1944 of Service Tax Central Exise & Customs, 2010-11 Indore

10. The Company does not have any accumulated losses at the end of the financial year and it has not incurred any cash losses in the current or in the immediately preceding financial year.

11. According to the information and explanations given to us the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to banks and financial institutions.

12. According to the information and explanations given to us the Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xii) of the order are not applicable to the Company.

13. The company is not a chit fund or a nidhi mutual benefit fund /society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of the order are not applicable to the Company.

14. As informed to us, the Company is not dealing in or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the order are not applicable to the Company.

15. In our opinion, the terms and conditions on which the Company has given guarantee for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions are not prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

16. To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information and explanations given to us the Company did not have any term loans outstanding during the year.

17. According to the cash flow statement and other records examined by us and the information and explanations given to us, on an overall basis, funds raised on short term basis, have prima facie, not been used during the year for long term investments.

18. According to the information and explanations given to us no preferential allotment of shares has been made by the Company to companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

19. The Company has not issued any secured debentures and accordingly the provisions of clause 4(xix) of the order are not applicable.

20. The Company has not raised any money through a public issue during the year.

21. To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information and explanations given to us, no material fraud on or by the company has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.

For B. D. Jokhakar & Co.

Chartered Accountants

Firm Registration No. 104345W

Raman Jokhakar Mumbai Partner

May 14, 2011 Membership No. 103241


Mar 31, 2010

1. We have audited the attached balance sheet of Unichem Laboratories Limited as at 31st March, 2010, the profit & loss account and also the cash flow statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statements presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

3. As required by the Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order, 2003 (as amended) (‘the order’) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraph 4 & 5 of the said order.

4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 3 above, we report that:

(a) We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

(c) The balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash flow statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

(d) In our opinion the balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash flow statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors, as on 31st March, 2010 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March, 2010 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(f) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said financial statements, read with the notes thereon give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956 in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

i) in the case of the balance sheet of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31st March, 2010;

ii) in the case of the profit and loss account, of the profit for the year ended on that date; and

iii) in the case of cash flow statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.



Annexure referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date

1. (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitative details and situation of

fixed assets.

(b) As explained to us, some of the fixed assets of the Company have been physically verified during the year by the management in accordance with a phased program of verification designed to cover all assets over a period of three years, which in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. The discrepancies noticed on such verification were not material and have been properly dealt with in the books of account.

(c) The fixed assets disposed off during the year, in our opinion, do not constitute a substantial part of the fixed assets of the Company and such disposal has, not affected the going concern status of the Company.

2. (a) As explained to us, the inventories have been physically verified during the year by the management, except for the

inventories lying with third parties, which have however, been confirmed by them. The intervals at which the inventories have been verified are, in our opinion, reasonable in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business;

(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management were reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of the business.

(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.

3. (a) As informed, the Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured loan to companies, firms or other

parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, sub clause (b), (c) and (d) are not applicable. (e) The Company has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured from companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Consequently, sub clauses (e), (f) and (g) are not applicable.

4. In our opinion, and according to the information and explanation given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there is no continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in such internal control systems.

5. To the best of our knowledge and belief and as explained to us the Company has not entered into any transactions required to be entered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Therefore, clause 4(v)(b) of the order is not applicable.

6. In our opinion, and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has complied with the provisions of Section 58A, 58AA or any relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the rules framed there under and the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India, where applicable, with regard to the deposits accepted from the public. We have been informed that no order has been passed by Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any Court or any other tribunal.

7. In our opinion, the internal audit system is commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

8. We have broadly reviewed the books of account and records maintained by the Company pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under Section 209 (1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 relating to the manufacture of Bulk drugs and Pharmaceutical Specialties and are of the opinion that, prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been maintained. We have, however, not made a detailed examination of the said records with a view to determine whether they are accurate or complete.

9. (a) The Company is regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues payable in respect of provident fund, investor

education and protection fund, employees state insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, wealth tax, custom duty, excise duty, cess and any other material statutory dues with the appropriate authorities during the year. There were no undisputed statutory dues as mentioned above in arrears as at 31st March, 2010 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(b) According to the information & explanations given to us, the dues in respect of excise duty and custom duty that have not been deposited with the appropriate authorities on account of dispute and the forum where the disputes are pending as on 31st March, 2010 are as given below:

Name of the Nature of Amount Forum where Period to Statutes the dues (Rs. in dispute is which it lacs) pending relates

Central Excise Penalty 11.61 Customs Excise and Service Tax 2003-04 Act, 1944 Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi

Custom Act, Custom duty 400.00 Jt. Director General of 1997-98 1962 including interest Foreign Trade, Bhopal and penalty

10. The Company does not have any accumulated losses at the end of the financial year and it has not incurred any cash losses in the current or in the immediately preceding financial year.

11. According to the information and explanations given to us the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to banks and financial institutions.

12. According to the information and explanations given to us the Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xii) of the order are not applicable to the Company.

13. The Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi mutual benefit fund /society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of the order are not applicable to the Company.

14. In respect of transactions of the Company in shares, securities and other investments, we report that the Company has kept adequate records of its transactions and contracts and timely entries have been made therein. The shares, securities, and other investments, are held by the Company in its own name.

15. In our opinion, the terms and conditions on which the Company has given guarantee for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions are not prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

16. To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information and explanations given to us, term loans have been used for the purpose for which they are obtained. However no term loans were taken during the year and outstanding balance as at the year end was NIL.

17. According to the cash flow statement and other records examined by us and the information and explanations given to us, on an overall basis, funds raised on short term basis, have prima facie, not been used during the year for long term investments.

18. According to the information and explanations given to us no preferential allotment of shares has been made by the Company to companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

19. The Company has not issued any secured debentures and accordingly the provisions of clause 4(xix) of the order are not applicable.

20. The Company has not raised any money through a public issue during the year.

21. To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information and explanations given to us, no material fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.

For B. D. Jokhakar & Co.

Chartered Accountants

Firm Registration No. 104345W

Raman Jokhakar Mumbai Partner

July 22, 2010 Membership No. 103241

Disclaimer: This is 3rd Party content/feed, viewers are requested to use their discretion and conduct proper diligence before investing, GoodReturns does not take any liability on the genuineness and correctness of the information in this article

Get Instant News Updates
Enable
x
Notification Settings X
Time Settings
Done
Clear Notification X
Do you want to clear all the notifications from your inbox?
Settings X