Mar 31, 2023
To the Members of Black Box Limited
Report on the Audit of the Standalone Financial Statements
1. We have audited the accompanying standalone financial statements of Black Box Limited (the âCompanyâ), which comprise the Standalone Balance Sheet as at 31 March 2023, the Standalone Statement of Profit and Loss (including Other Comprehensive Income), the Standalone Statement of Cash Flows and the Standalone Statement of Changes in Equity for the year then ended, and notes to the standalone financial statements, including a summary of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
2. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid standalone financial statements give the information required by the Companies Act, 2013 (the âActâ) in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the Indian Accounting Standards (âInd ASâ) specified under section 133 of the Act read with the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015 and other accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31 March 2023, and its profit (including Other Comprehensive Income), its cash flows and the changes in equity for the year ended on that date.
3. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under section 143(10) of the Act. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditorâs Responsibilities for the Audit of the Standalone Financial Statements section of our report. We are independent of the Company in accordance with the Code of Ethics issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (the âICAIâ) together with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the standalone financial statements under the provisions of the Act and the rules made thereunder, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the Code of Ethics issued by the ICAI. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
EMPHASIS OF MATTER - NON-COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS
4. We draw attention to Note 47 to the accompanying standalone financial statements which describes the delay in remittance of import payments and repatriation of proceeds of export of goods and services, aggregating to '' 3.28 Crores and '' 17.82 Crores, respectively, outstanding as at 31 March 2023 beyond the timelines stipulated under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, as amended from time to time. The management has filed necessary applications with the appropriate authority for extension of time period and condonation of such delays. The management is of the view that the fines/ penalties, if any, that may be levied, are currently unascertainable but not expected to be material and accordingly, no adjustments have been made to the accompanying standalone financial statements in respect of aforesaid delays. Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter.
5. Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the standalone financial statements of the current period. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the standalone financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
6. We have determined the matter described below to be the key audit matter to be communicated in our report.
Key audit matter |
How our audit addressed the key audit matter |
|
Revenue Recognition under Ind AS 115, |
Our |
audit included, but was not limited to, the following |
Revenue from Contracts with Customers |
procedures performed in respect of revenue recognition: |
|
(''Ind AS 115â) |
||
Refer note 2D(xvii) - âIncome recognitionâ and notes 23 and 42 - âRevenue from contracts with customersâ to the standalone financial statements for the related accounting policy on revenue recognition and details of revenue recognised during the year. |
⢠|
Evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of internal financial controls relating to the application of revenue accounting standard specifically those relating to identification of the distinct performance obligations and determination of transaction price. Procedures performed included enquiry and observation, reperformance or inspection |
Revenue for the Company consists primarily of sale of products and sale of implementation |
as applicable, of evidence in respect of operation of these controls. |
|
and maintenance services for networking equipment and communications technology solutions. |
⢠|
Tested the relevant information technology systemsâ access and change management controls relating to contracts and related information used in recording |
Owing to the multiplicity of the Companyâs products and services, compliance with varied customer specifications, and diverse terms of contracts with customers, revenue is determined to be an area involving significant risk and hence, |
⢠|
and presenting revenue in accordance with the revenue accounting standard. Selected a sample of contracts and performed the following procedures: |
requiring significant auditor attention. |
o Read, analysed and identified the distinct |
|
Further, the application of Ind AS 115 involves |
performance obligations in these contracts; |
|
significant judgements/ material estimates relating to identification of distinct performance obligations, determination of transaction price, |
o Compared such performance obligations with those identified and recorded by the management; and |
|
including impact of variable consideration, of the identified performance obligations and the appropriateness of the basis used to measure revenue recognised over a period of time. |
o Reviewed contract terms to determine the transaction price including variable consideration, if any, to determine the appropriate transaction price for computing revenue. |
|
Considering the materiality of amounts involved, significance of the area to the standalone financial statements, combined with significant judgements and estimates involved, revenue recognition is considered to be a key audit matter for the current year audit. |
⢠|
Samples in respect of revenue recorded for sale of products were tested by inspecting either the customer acceptances, invoices and/ or historical trend of collections and disputes. Further, tested sample transactions before and after year end to ensure revenue is recorded in the correct period. |
⢠|
In respect of samples relating to fixed maintenance contracts, verified the period of the contract with the customer agreements and verified whether the revenue was recognised appropriately over the period of contract as services were being rendered basis the method of determination of satisfaction of performance obligations in accordance with Ind AS 115. |
Key audit matter |
How our audit addressed the key audit matter |
⢠Tested samples of credit notes issued during the year and subsequent to year end, if any to confirm revenue recognised during the period was appropriate. |
|
⢠Performed analytical procedures for reasonableness of revenue recorded. |
|
⢠Assessed the appropriateness and adequacy of disclosures included in the standalone financial statements, in accordance with the requirements of Ind AS 115. |
INFORMATION OTHER THAN THE STANDALONE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND AUDITORâS REPORTTHEREON
7. The Companyâs Board of Directors are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information included in the Annual Report but does not include the standalone financial statements and our auditorâs report thereon. The Annual Report is expected to be made available to us after the date of this auditorâs report.
Our opinion on the standalone financial statements does not cover the other information and we will not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
I n connection with our audit of the standalone financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information identified above when it becomes available and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the standalone financial statements, or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.
When we read the Annual Report, if we conclude that there is a material misstatement therein, we are required to communicate the matter to those charged with governance.
RESPONSIBILITIES OF MANAGEMENT AND THOSE CHARGED WITH GOVERNANCE FOR THESTANDALONE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
8. The accompanying standalone financial statements have been approved by the Companyâs Board of Directors. The Companyâs Board of Directors are responsible for the matters stated in section 134(5) of the Act with respect to the preparation and presentation of these standalone financial statements that give a true and fair view of the standalone financial position, standalone financial performance including Other Comprehensive Income, standalone changes in equity and standalone cash flows of the Company in accordance with the Ind AS specified under section 133 of the Act and other accounting principles generally accepted in India. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding of the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the standalone financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
9. I n preparing the standalone financial statements, the Board of Directors are responsible for assessing the Companyâs ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the Board of Directors either intend to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.
10. Those Board of Directors are also responsible for overseeing the Companyâs financial reporting process.
AUDITORâS RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THE AUDIT OF THE STANDALONE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
11. Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the standalone financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditorâs report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with Standards on Auditing will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these standalone financial statements.
12. As part of an audit in accordance with Standards on Auditing, specified under section 143(10) of the Act we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. We also:
⢠Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the standalone financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control;
⢠Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. Under section 143(3)(i) of the Act we are also responsible for expressing our opinion on whether the Company has adequate Internal Financial Controls with reference to standalone financial statements in place and the operating effectiveness of such controls;
⢠Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by management;
⢠Conclude on the appropriateness of Board of Directorsâ use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Companyâs ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditorâs report to the related disclosures in the standalone financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditorâs report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Company to cease to continue as a going concern; and
⢠Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the standalone financial statements, including the disclosures, and whether the standalone financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.
13. We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.
14. We also provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards.
15. From the matters communicated with those charged with governance, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the standalone financial statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditorâs report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.
REPORT ON OTHER LEGAL AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
16. As required by section 197(16) of the Act based on our audit, we report that the Company has paid remuneration to its directors during the year in accordance with the provisions of and limits laid down under section 197 read with Schedule V to the Act.
17. As required by the Companies (Auditorâs Report) Order, 2020 (the âOrderâ) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of section 143(11) of the Act we give in the Annexure - I, a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order, to the extent applicable.
18. Further to our comments in Annexure - I, as required by section 143(3) of the Act based on our audit, we report, to the extent applicable, that:
a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit of the accompanying standalone financial statements;
b) I n our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books;
c) The standalone financial statements dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;
d) In our opinion, the aforesaid standalone financial statements comply with Ind AS specified under section 133 of the Act;
e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31 March 2023 from being appointed as a director in terms of section 164(2) of the Act;
f) With respect to the adequacy of the Internal Financial Controls with reference to standalone financial statements of the Company as on 31 March 2023 and the operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to our separate report in Annexure - II wherein we have expressed an unmodified opinion; and
g) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditorâs Report in accordance with rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014 (as amended), in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:
i. The Company, as detailed in Note 37A to the standalone financial statements, has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its standalone financial position as at 31 March 2023;
ii. The Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses as at 31 March 2023;
iii. There were no amounts which were required to be transferred to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company during the year ended 31 March 2023;
iv. a. The management has represented that, to the best of its knowledge and belief, as disclosed in
Note 51(f) to the standalone financial statements, no funds have been advanced or loaned or invested (either from borrowed funds or securities premium or any other sources or kind of funds) by the Company to or in any person or entity, including foreign entity (the âintermediariesâ), with the understanding, whether recorded in writing or otherwise, that the intermediary shall, whether, directly or indirectly lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or on behalf of the Company (the âUltimate Beneficiariesâ) or provide any guarantee, security or the like on behalf the Ultimate Beneficiaries;
b. The management has represented that, to the best of its knowledge and belief, as disclosed in Note 51(f) to the standalone financial statements, no funds have been received by the Company from any person or entity, including foreign entity (the âFunding Partiesâ), with the understanding, whether recorded in writing or otherwise, that the Company shall, whether directly or indirectly, lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or on behalf of the Funding Party (âUltimate Beneficiariesâ) or provide any guarantee, security or the like on behalf of the Ultimate Beneficiaries; and
c. Based on such audit procedures performed as considered reasonable and appropriate in the circumstances, nothing has come to our notice that has caused us to believe that the management representations under sub-clauses (a) and (b) above contain any material misstatement.
v. The Company has not declared or paid any dividend during the year ended 31 March 2023.
vi. Proviso to Rule 3(1) of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014 requires all companies which use accounting software for maintaining their books of account, to use such an accounting software which has a feature of audit trail, with effect from the financial year beginning on 01 April 2023 and accordingly, reporting under Rule 11(g) of Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014 (as amended) is not applicable for the current financial year.
For Walker Chandiok & Co LLP
Chartered Accountants
Firmâs Registration No.: 001076N/N500013
Bharat Shetty
Partner
Membership No.: 106815
UDIN: 23106815BGYCAM4238
Place: Mumbai
Date : 30 May 2023
Mar 31, 2021
To the Members of AGC Networks Limited
Report on the Audit of the Standalone Financial Statements
1. We have audited the accompanying standalone financial statements of AGC Networks Limited (âthe Companyâ), which comprise the Standalone Balance Sheet as at 31 March 2021, the Standalone Statement of Profit and Loss (including Other Comprehensive Income), the Standalone Cash Flow Statement and the Standalone Statement of Changes in Equity for the year then ended, and a summary of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
2. I n our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid standalone financial statements give the information required by the Companies Act, 2013 (âActâ) in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India including Indian Accounting Standards (âInd ASâ) specified under section 133 of the Act, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31 March 2021, and its loss (including other comprehensive income), its cash flows and the changes in equity for the year ended on that date.
3. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under section 143(10) of the Act. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditorâs Responsibilities for the Audit of the Standalone Financial Statements section of our report. We are independent of the Company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the standalone financial statements in terms of the Code of Ethics issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (âICAIâ) and the relevant provisions of the Act and the rules thereunder, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the Code of Ethics. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
EMpHASiS OF MATTERS4. impact of COViD-19
We draw your attention to note 46 to the accompanying standalone financial statements, which describes the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the Companyâs operations and on accompanying standalone financial statements as at reporting date. In view of the uncertainties in the economic environment due to the outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic, the impact on the operations of the Company is significantly dependent on the future developments as they evolve.
5. Non-compliance with laws and regulations
We draw attention to note 45 to the accompanying standalone financial statements, which describes the delay in remittance of import payments and repatriation of proceeds of export of goods and services, aggregating to
'' 2.10 Crores and '' 4.56 Crores, respectively, outstanding as at 31 March 2021 beyond the timelines stipulated under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, as amended from time to time. The management has filed necessary applications with the appropriate authority for extension of time period and condonation of such delays. The management is of the view that the fine / penalties, if any, that may be levied, are currently unascertainable but not expected to be material and accordingly, no adjustments have been made to the accompanying standalone financial statements in respect of the fine / penalties that may be levied on account of such delays.
Our opinion is not modified in respect of matters reported in paragraphs 4 and 5 above.
6. Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the standalone financial statements of the current year. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the standalone financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
7. We have determined that there are no key audit matters to communicate in our report.
information other than the Standalone Financial Statements and Auditorâs Report thereon
8. The Companyâs Board of Directors are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information included in the Annual Report but does not include the standalone financial statements and our auditorâs report thereon. The Annual Report is expected to be made available to us after the date of this auditorâs report.
Our opinion on the standalone financial statements does not cover the other information and we will not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
I n connection with our audit of the standalone financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information identified above when it becomes available and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the standalone financial statements, or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.
When we read the Annual Report, if we conclude that there is a material misstatement therein, we are required to communicate the matter to those charged with governance.
Responsibilities of Management and Those Charged with Governance for the Standalone Financial Statements
9. The accompanying standalone financial statements have been approved by the Companyâs Board of Directors. The Companyâs Board of Directors are responsible for the matters stated in section 134(5) of the Act with respect to the preparation and presentation of these standalone financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance including other comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Ind AS specified under section 133 of the Act. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding of the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and
completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the standalone financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
10. In preparing the standalone financial statements, Board of Directors are responsible for assessing the Companyâs ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless Board of Directors either intend to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.
11. Those Board of Directors are also responsible for overseeing the Companyâs financial reporting process.
Auditorâs Responsibilities for the Audit of the Standalone Financial Statements
12. Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the standalone financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditorâs report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with Standards on Auditing will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these standalone financial statements.
13. As part of an audit in accordance with Standards on Auditing, we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. We also:
⢠Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the standalone financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control;
⢠Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. Under section 143(3)(i) of the Act, we are also responsible for expressing our opinion on whether the Company has adequate internal financial controls with reference to standalone financial statements in place and the operating effectiveness of such controls;
⢠Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by management;
⢠Conclude on the appropriateness of managementâs use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Companyâs ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditorâs report to the related disclosures in the standalone financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditorâs report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Company to cease to continue as a going concern; and
⢠Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the standalone financial statements, including the disclosures, and whether the standalone financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation;
14. We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.
15. We also provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards.
16. From the matters communicated with those charged with governance, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the standalone financial statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditorâs report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
17. As required by section 197(16) of the Act, based on our audit, we report that the Company has paid remuneration to its directors during the year in accordance with the provisions of and limits laid down under section 197 read with Schedule V to the Act.
18. As required by the Companies (Auditorâs Report) Order, 2016 (âthe Orderâ) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of section 143(11) of the Act, we give in the Annexure I, a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.
19. Further to our comments in Annexure I, as required by section 143(3) of the Act, based on our audit, we report, to the extent applicable, that:
a) we have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit of the accompanying standalone financial statements;
b) i n our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books;
c) the standalone financial statements dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;
d) in our opinion, the aforesaid standalone financial statements comply with Ind AS specified under section 133 of the Act;
e) on the basis of the written representations received from the directors and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors are disqualified as on 31 March 2021 from being appointed as a director in terms of section 164(2) of the Act;
f) we have also audited the internal financial controls with reference to standalone financial statements of the Company as on 31 March 2021 in conjunction with our audit of the standalone financial statements of the Company for the year ended on that date and our report dated 02 August 2021 as per Annexure II expressed unmodified opinion; and
g) with respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditorâs Report in accordance with rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014 (as amended), in our opinion and to the best of our information
and according to the explanations given to us:
i. the Company, as detailed in note 33 to the standalone financial statements, has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position as at 31 March 2021;
ii. the Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses as at 31 March 2021;
iii. there were no amounts which were required to be transferred to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company during the year ended 31 March 2021; and
iv. t he disclosure requirements relating to holdings as well as dealings in specified bank notes were applicable for the period from 8 November 2016 to 30 December 2016, which are not relevant to these standalone financial statements. Hence, reporting under this clause is not applicable.
Chartered Accountants
Firmâs Registration No.: 001076N/N500013
Partner
Membership No.: 106815
UDIN: 21106815AAAACR3162Place : Mumbai
Date : 02 August 2021
Mar 31, 2018
Report on the Standalone Financial Statements
1. We have audited the accompanying standalone financial statements of AGC Networks Limited (âthe Companyâ), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 31 March 2018, the Statement of Profit and Loss (including Other Comprehensive Income), the Cash Flow Statement and the Statement of Changes in Equity for the year then ended, and a summary of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Managementâs Responsibility for the Standalone Financial Statements
2. The Companyâs Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 (âthe Actâ) with respect to the preparation of these standalone financial statements that give a true and fair view of the state of affairs (financial position), profit or loss (financial performance including other comprehensive income), cash flows and changes in equity of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Indian Accounting Standards (âInd ASâ) specified under Section 133 of the Act. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the standalone financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditorâs Responsibility
3. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these standalone financial statements based on our audit.
4. We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made thereunder.
5. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether these standalone financial statements are free from material misstatement.
6. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the standalone financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditorâs judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial controls relevant to the Companyâs preparation of the standalone financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Companyâs Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the standalone financial statements.
7. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our qualified audit opinion on these standalone financial statements.
Basis for Qualified Opinion
8. As stated in Note 42 to the standalone financial statements, during the year ended 31 March 2015, the Company had recognised sale of two properties, classified as fixed assets under previous GAAP, having carrying values of Rs. 0.74 crores and Rs. 0.35 crores, and recorded profit on such sale amounting to Rs. 40.85 crores and Rs. 5.19 crores respectively (net of incidental selling expenses amounting to Rs. 3.04 crores and Rs. 0.35 crores). In our opinion, the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the said properties were not transferred when such sale was recognised. The Company has not rectified the said error in these first Ind AS financial statements, and therefore, recognition of such sale and the accounting treatment followed by the Company is not in accordance with the principles laid under Indian Accounting Standard (Ind AS) 16 âProperty, Plant and Equipmentâ.
Had the Company followed the principles of Ind AS 16 and corrected the error in accordance with Ind AS 101: First-time Adoption of Indian Accounting Standards, the carrying value of current tax assets (net), and property, plant and equipment as at 1 April 2016 would have been higher by Rs. 3.27 crores and Rs. 1.09 crores respectively, and other financial liabilities, current financial asset (receivable for sale of property) and retained earnings as at that date would have been lower by Rs. 0.19 crores, Rs. 47.32 crores and Rs. 42.77 crores respectively.
Further, in our opinion, the significant risks and rewards of ownership in respect of one of the said properties having a carrying value of Rs. 0.35 crores as at 31 March 2015 were transferred in April 2016 while the significant risks and rewards of ownership in respect of the other property having a carrying value of Rs. 0.74 crores as at 31 March 2015 have not been transferred until 31 March 2018.
Had the Company followed the principles of Ind AS 16, and corrected the aforementioned errors in accordance with Ind AS 8 in the current year financial statements, other income for the year ended 31 March 2018 would have been higher by Rs. Nil (31 March 2017: Rs. 5.19 crores) while depreciation expense would have been higher by Rs. 0.04 crores (31 March 2017: Rs. 0.05 crores). The carrying value of property, plant and equipment and current tax assets(net) as at 31 March 2018 would have been higher by Rs.0.74 crores (31 March 2017: Rs. 0.74 crores) and by Rs. 3.27 crores (31 March 2017: Rs. 3.27 crores) respectively. The other financial liabilities and current financial assets (receivable from sale of property) as at 31 March 2018 would have been lower by Rs. 0.16 crores (31 March 2017: Rs. 0.16 crores) and Rs. 23.55 crores (31 March 2017: Rs. 47.32 crores) respectively. The resulting impact of the above correction in errors would have resulted into decrease in retained earnings as at 31 March 2018 by Rs. 37.58 crores (31 March 2017: Rs. 37.58 crores).
Qualified Opinion
9. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, except for the effects of the matter described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph, the aforesaid standalone financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India including Ind AS specified under Section 133 of the Act, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31 March 2018, and its profit including other comprehensive income, its cash flows and the changes in equity for the year ended on that date.
Other Matter
10. The Company had prepared separate sets of standalone financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2017 and 31 March 2016 in accordance with Accounting Standards prescribed under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014 (as amended) on which we issued auditorâs reports dated 24 May 2017 and 19 May 2016 respectively. These separate sets of standalone financial statements have been adjusted for the differences in the accounting principles adopted by the Company on transition to Ind AS, which have also been audited by us. Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter.
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
11. As required by the Companies (Auditorâs Report) Order, 2016 (âthe Orderâ) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of Section 143(11) of the Act, we give in the Annexure I a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.
12. Further to our comments in Annexure I, as required by Section 143(3) of the Act, we report that:
a) we have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;
b) except for the effects of the matters described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph, in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books;
c) the standalone financial statements dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;
d) except for the effects of the matter described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph, in our opinion, the aforesaid standalone financial statements comply with Ind AS specified under Section 133 of the Act;
e) the matter described in paragraph 8 under the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph, in our opinion, may have an adverse effect on the functioning of the Company;
f) on the basis of the written representations received from the directors and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31 March 2018 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164(2) of the Act;
g) the qualification relating to the maintenance of accounts and other matters connected therewith are as stated in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph;
h) we have also audited the internal financial controls over financial reporting (IFCoFR) of the Company as on 31 March 2018 in conjunction with our audit of the standalone financial statements of the Company for the year ended on that date and our report dated 29 May 2018 as per Annexure II expressed a qualified opinion;
i) with respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditorâs Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014 (as amended), in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:
i. the Company, as detailed in Note 36 to the standalone financial statements, has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position;
ii. the Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses;
iii. there has been no delay in transferring amounts, required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company;
iv. the disclosure requirements relating to holdings as well as dealings in specified bank notes were applicable for the period from 8 November 2016 to 30 December 2016 which are not relevant to these standalone financial statements. Hence, reporting under this clause is not applicable.
Annexure I to the Independent Auditorâs Report of even date to the members of AGC Networks Limited, on the standalone financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2018
Annexure I
Based on the audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting a true and fair view on the financial statements of the Company and taking into consideration the information and explanations given to us and the books of account and other records examined by us in the normal course of audit, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, we report that:
(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of property, plant and equipment.
(b) The property, plant and equipment have been physically verified by the management during the year and no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification. In our opinion, the frequency of verification of the property, plant and equipment is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets.
(c) The title deeds of all the immovable properties (which are included under the head âproperty, plant and equipmentâ) are held in the name of the Company.
(ii) In our opinion, the management has conducted physical verification of inventory at reasonable intervals during the year and no material discrepancies between physical inventory and book records were noticed on physical verification.
(iii) The Company has not granted any loan, secured or unsecured to companies, firms, Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs) or other parties covered in the register maintained under Section 189 of the Act. Accordingly, the provisions of clauses 3(iii)(a), 3(iii)(b) and 3(iii)(c) of the Order are not applicable.
(iv) In our opinion, the Company has not entered into any transaction covered under Sections 185 and 186 of the Act. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 3(iv) of the Order are not applicable.
(v) In our opinion, the Company has not accepted any deposits within the meaning of Sections 73 to 76 of the Act and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014 (as amended). Accordingly, the provisions of clause 3(v) of the Order are not applicable.
(vi) The Central Government has not specified maintenance of cost records under sub-section (1) of Section 148 of the Act, in respect of Companyâs products/ services. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 3(vi) of the Order are not applicable.
(vii) (a) Undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, employeesâ state insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value added tax, cess and other material statutory dues, as applicable, have generally been regularly deposited to the appropriate authorities, though there has been a slight delay in a few cases. Further, no undisputed amounts payable in respect thereof were outstanding at the year-end for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.
(b) The dues outstanding in respect of income-tax, sales-tax, service-tax, duty of customs, duty of excise and value added tax on account of any dispute, are as follows:
Name of the statute |
Nature of dues |
Amount (Rs. in Crore) |
Amount Paid under protest (Rs. in Crore) |
Period to which the amount relates |
Forum where dispute is pending |
The Central Excise Act, 1944 |
Demand on account of incorrect duty credit/short payment |
0.47 |
0.04 |
1991-92 to 1996-97 |
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal |
Finance Act, 1994 |
Service tax demand on RTU activation and penalty thereon |
0.50 |
0.05 |
2006-07, 2007-08 and 2011-12 |
Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax - Appeals |
Finance Act, 1994 |
Service tax demand on RTU activation and penalty thereon |
4.17 |
0.35 |
2003-04 to 2006-07 |
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal |
Finance Act, 1994 |
Service tax demand on Royalty payment |
0.74 |
- |
2004-05 to 2006-07 |
Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax - Appeals |
Finance Act, 1994 |
Excise Duty on CT 3 Clearance and Incorrect Input Tax Credit of Service Tax paid on Foreign Service Provider |
4.73 |
0.05 |
2003-04 to 2007-08 |
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal |
Finance Act, 1994 |
Service tax demand along with penalty on excess cenvat utilisation |
7.04 |
0.50 |
2004-05 to 2007-08 |
Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax - Appeals |
Finance Act, 1994 |
Interest and penalty on Service tax payable under reverse charge as a recipient of foreign service |
0.06 |
0.03 |
2005-06 |
Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax - Appeals |
Finance Act, 1994 |
Service tax penalty under reverse charge mechanism. |
0.38 |
- |
2017-18 |
Commissioner Appeals, Ahmedabad |
Finance Act, 1994 |
Service tax penalty under reverse charge mechanism. |
0.21 |
- |
2017-18 |
Appeal yet to be filed with Commissioner Appeals, Ahmedabad |
The Customs Act, 1962 |
Demand for the payment of custom duty on Royalty Payments |
6.60 |
- |
Various Financial Years |
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal |
West Bengal Sales Tax, 1994 |
Interest on Works Contract tax / Sales tax |
0.03 |
- |
2003-04, 2005-06 and 2006-07 |
Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, West Bengal |
Kerala Value added Tax Act, 2003 |
Differential VAT rate demand |
0.08 |
- |
2008-09 |
Kerala VAT Tribunal |
Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 |
Non-submissions of F-forms |
0.08 |
0.03 |
2009-10 and 2011-12 |
Assistant Commissioner Appeals |
Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 |
Demand on account of disallowance of Works Contract Tax TDS credit and applicability of VAT on service tax |
0.77 |
0.28 |
2008-09, 2010-11 and 2011-12 |
Joint Commissioner of Sales Tax Appeals |
Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008 |
VAT and interest payable on the basis of regular assessment |
0.28 |
0.08 |
2008-09 |
Additional Commissioner Appeals |
Gujarat Value added tax Act, 2003 |
Demand on Non receipt of statutory forms |
0.74 |
0.26 |
2011-12 |
Gujarat VAT Tribunal |
Gujarat Value added tax Act, 2003 |
Demand on Non receipt of statutory forms |
1.74 |
0.43 |
2012-13 |
Joint Commissioner of Commercial Tax (Appeals) |
Gujarat Value added tax Act, 2003 |
Non receipt of C/I/F Forms, Disallowance of Input tax Credits and Levy of Penalty |
0.23 |
0.06 |
2013-14 |
Joint Commissioner of Commercial Tax (Appeals) |
Income Tax Act, 1961 |
Reopening of assessment u/s 147. |
0.62 |
0.62 |
2003-04 |
High Court |
Income Tax Act, 1961 |
Tax and penalty on deferred revenue treated as revenue. |
20.26 |
20.26 |
2004-05, 2005-06 and 2006-07 |
Income Tax Appellant Tribunal (ITAT) |
Income Tax Act, 1961 |
Penalty levied on concealment of Income u/s 271(1)(C ) |
0.28 |
0.28 |
2007-08 |
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) |
Income Tax Act, 1961 |
Tax and penalty on deferred revenue treated as revenue. |
5.53 |
5.53 |
2009-10 |
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) |
Income Tax Act, 1961 |
Demand on account of disallowance of certain expenditures |
4.73 |
4.73 |
2011-12 |
Income Tax Appellant Tribunal (ITAT) |
Income Tax Act, 1961 |
Demand on account of disallowance of expenditure incurred towards employee separation scheme (Re-assessment) |
0.55 |
0.55 |
2008-09 |
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) |
Income Tax Act, 1961 |
Penalty levied on concealment of income u/s 271(1)(C) |
2.22 |
- |
2010-11 |
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) |
Income Tax Act, 1961 |
Demand on account of disallowance of certain expenditures |
4.43 |
- |
2012-13 |
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) |
Income Tax Act, 1961 |
Demand on account of disallowance of provision of expenses, renovation expense & unearned revenue |
11.94 |
- |
2013-14 |
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) |
(viii) The Company has not defaulted in repayment of loans or borrowings to any financial institution or a bank or government during the year. The Company did not have any outstanding debentures during the year.
(ix) The Company did not raise moneys by way of initial public offer or further public offer (including debt instruments). The Company did not have any term loans outstanding during the year. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 3(ix) of the Order are not applicable.
(x) No fraud by the Company or on the company by its officers or employees has been noticed or reported during the period covered by our audit.
(xi) The Company has not paid or provided for any managerial remuneration. Accordingly, the provisions of Clause 3(xi) of the Order are not applicable.
(xii) In our opinion, the Company is not a Nidhi Company. Accordingly, provisions of clause 3(xii) of the Order are not applicable.
(xiii) In our opinion, all transactions with the related parties are in compliance with Sections 177 and 188 of Act, where applicable, and the requisite details have been disclosed in the financial statements etc., as required by the applicable Ind AS.
(xiv) During the year, the Company has not made any preferential allotment or private placement of shares or fully or partly convertible debentures.
(xv) In our opinion, the Company has not entered into any non-cash transactions with the directors or persons connected with them covered under Section 192 of the Act.
(xvi) The Company is not required to be registered under Section 45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934.
Annexure II to the Independent Auditorâs Report of even date to the members of AGC Networks Limited, on the standalone financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2018
Annexure II
Independent Auditorâs Report on the Internal Financial Controls under Clause (i) of Sub-section 3 of Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 (âthe Actâ)
1. In conjunction with our audit of the standalone financial statements of AGC Networks Limited (âthe Companyâ) as at and for the year ended 31 March 2018, we have audited the internal financial controls over financial reporting (âIFCoFRâ) of the Company as at that date.
Managementâs Responsibility for Internal Financial Controls
2. The Companyâs Board of Directors is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal financial controls based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (âthe Guidance Noteâ). These responsibilities include the design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls that were operating effectively for ensuring the orderly and efficient conduct of the Companyâs business, including adherence to the Companyâs policies, the safeguarding of its assets, the prevention and detection of frauds and errors, the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, and the timely preparation of reliable financial information, as required under the Act.
Auditorâs Responsibility
3. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companyâs IFCoFR based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (âICAIâ) and deemed to be prescribed under Section 143(10) of the Act, to the extent applicable to an audit of IFCoFR, and the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting (âthe Guidance Noteâ) issued by the ICAI. Those Standards and the Guidance Note require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether adequate IFCoFR were established and maintained and if such controls operated effectively in all material respects.
4. Our audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the adequacy of the IFCoFR and their operating effectiveness. Our audit of IFCoFR includes obtaining an understanding of IFCoFR, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. The procedures selected depend on the auditorâs judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the standalone financial statements, whether due to fraud or error.
5. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the Companyâs IFCoFR.
Meaning of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting
6. A companyâs IFCoFR is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companyâs IFCoFR include those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorisations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorised acquisition, use, or disposition of the companyâs assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Inherent Limitations of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting
7. Because of the inherent limitations of IFCoFR, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of the IFCoFR to future periods are subject to the risk that the IFCoFR may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Basis of Qualified Opinion
8. In our opinion, according to the information and explanations given to us and based on our audit, the following material weakness has been identified in the operating effectiveness of the Holding Companyâs IFCoFR as at 31 March 2018:
The Companyâs internal financial control over evaluation of accounting of non-routine transactions was not operating effectively. During the year, this has resulted in non-reversal of transaction for sale of one property for risk and rewards were not transferred till the reporting date, due to inappropriate evaluation of timing of transfer of risk and reward during an earlier year. This has led to misstatements of current tax assets (net), property, plant and equipment, current financial assets, other financial liabilities, other income, depreciation and resultant impact on the retained earnings as at 31 March 2018.
9. A âmaterial weaknessâ is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in IFCoFR, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Companyâs annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
Qualified Opinion
10. In our opinion, the Company has, in all material respects, adequate IFCoFR as at 31 March 2018, based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance note, and except for the effects of the material weakness described above in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph, on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Companyâs IFCoFR were operating effectively as at 31 March 2018.
11. We have considered the material weakness identified and reported above in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the standalone financial statements of the Company as at and for the year ended 31 March 2018, and the material weakness has affected our opinion on the standalone financial statements of the Company and we have issued a qualified opinion on the standalone financial statements.
For Walker Chandiok & Co LLP
Chartered Accountants
Firmâs Registration No.: 001076N/N500013
per Nikhilesh Nagar,
Partner
Membership No.: 079597
Place : Mumbai
Date : 29 May 2018
Mar 31, 2016
To the Members of AGC Networks Limited
Report on the Standalone Financial Statements
1. We have audited the accompanying standalone financial statements of AGC Networks Limited (âthe Companyâ), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 31 March 2016, the Statement of Profit and Loss and the Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Managementâs Responsibility for the Standalone Financial Statements
2. The Companyâs Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 (âthe Actâ) with respect to the preparation of these standalone financial statements, that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014 (as amended). This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act; safeguarding the assets of the Company; preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditorâs Responsibility
3. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these standalone financial statements based on our audit.
4. We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made there under.
5. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the standalone financial statements are free from material misstatement.
6. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditorâs judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial controls relevant to the Companyâs preparation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Companyâs Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.
7. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our qualified opinion on the standalone financial statements.
Basis for Qualified Opinion
8. As stated in Note 28 (b) to the Standalone financial statements, during the year ended 31 March 2015 the Company had recognized sale of properties having aggregate carrying value of Rs, 1.09 crores and profit on such sale amounting to Rs, 46.04 crores (net of incidental selling expenses amounting to Rs, 3.39 crores) under âexceptional itemsâ. In our opinion, as the significant risks and rewards for the said properties had not been transferred, recognition of such sale was not in accordance with the principles laid under Accounting Standard (AS) 9 Revenue Recognition and the sale should have been reversed during the year ended 31 March 2016. Had the Company followed principles of AS 9 and reversed the sale transaction during the year ended 31 March 2016, the prior period items and loss before tax would have been higher by Rs, 46.04 crores each. (March 2015: Exceptional items and profit before tax would have been lower by Rs, 46.04 crores each). Tax expense for the year ended 31 March 2016 would have been lower by Rs, 3.27 crores (March 2015: Rs, 3.27 crores). Long-term loans and advances and carrying value of tangible assets as at 31 March 2016 would have been higher by Rs, 3.27 crores (March 2015: Rs, 3.27 crores) and Rs, 1.09 crores (March 2015: Rs, 1.09 crores) respectively; reserves and surplus, other current assets and other current liabilities as at that date would have been lower by Rs, 42.77 crores (March 2015: Rs, 42.77 crores), Rs, 47.32 crores (net of Rs, 3.20 crores received during the year) (March 2015: Rs, 50.52 crores) and Rs, 0.19 crores (March 2015: Rs, 3.39 crores), respectively. Our audit opinion on the financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2015 was qualified in respect of this matter.
Qualified Opinion
9. I n our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, except for the effects of the matters described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph, the aforesaid standalone financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31 March 2016, and its loss and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
10. As required by the Companies (Auditorâs Report) Order, 2016 (âthe Orderâ) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of Section 143(11) of the Act, we give in the Annexure I a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.
11. As required by Section 143(3) of the Act, we report that:
a. we have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;
b. except for the effects of the matter described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph, in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books;
c. the standalone financial statements dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;
d. except for the effects of the matter described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph, in our opinion, the aforesaid standalone financial statements comply with the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014 (as amended);
e. the matter described in Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph in our opinion, may have an adverse effect on the functioning of the Company;
f. on the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on 31 March 2016 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31 March 2016 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164(2) of the Act;
g. the qualification relating to the maintenance of accounts and other matters connected therewith are as stated in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph;
h. we have also audited the internal financial controls over financial reporting (IFCoFR) of the Company as at 31 March 2016 in conjunction with our audit of the standalone financial statements of the Company for the year ended on that date and our report dated 19 May 2016 as per Annexure II expressed a qualified opinion.
i. with respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditorâs Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:
i. as detailed in Note 37 to the standalone financial statements, the Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its standalone financial position;
ii. the Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses;
iii. there has been no delay in transferring amounts, required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company
Annexure I
Based on the audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting a true and fair view on the financial statements of the Company and taking into consideration the information and explanations given to us and the books of account and other records examined by us in the normal course of audit, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, we report that:
(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.
(b) The fixed assets have been physically verified by the management during the year and no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification. In our opinion, the frequency of verification of the fixed assets is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets.
(c) The title deed of an immovable property is held in the name of the Company.
(ii) In our opinion, the management has conducted physical verification of inventory at reasonable intervals during the year and no material discrepancies between physical inventory and book records were noticed on physical verification.
(iii) (a) The Company has not granted any loan, secured or unsecured to companies, firms, limited liability partnerships (LLPs) or other parties covered in the register maintained under Section 189 of the Act during the year. Accordingly, the provision of clauses (a) of the Order is not applicable
(b) The principal and the interest for the loan granted to foreign subsidiary in an earlier year was repayable on demand and the entire amount of loan has been repaid during the year as stipulated.
(c) There is no overdue amount in respect of loan granted to foreign subsidiary. Accordingly, the provisions of clause (c) of the Order is not applicable.
(iv) In our opinion, the Company has not entered into any transaction covered under sections 185 and 186 of the Act. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 3(iv) of the Order are not applicable.
(v) I n our opinion, the Company has not accepted any deposits within the meaning of Sections 73 to 76 of the Act and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014 (as amended). Accordingly, the provisions of clause 3(v) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.
(vi) The Central Government has not specified maintenance of cost records under sub-section (1) of Section 148 of the Act, in respect of Companyâs products / services. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 3(vi) of the Order are not applicable.
(vii) (a) Undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, employeesâ state insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, service tax,
duty of customs, duty of excise, value added tax, cess and other material statutory dues, as applicable, have generally been regularly deposited to the appropriate authorities, though there has been a slight delay in a few cases. Further, no undisputed amounts payable in respect thereof were outstanding at the year-end for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.
(b) The dues outstanding in respect of income-tax, sales-tax, and service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise and value added tax on account of any dispute, are as follows:
Name of the statute |
Nature of dues |
Amount (Rs, in Crore) |
Amount Paid Under Protest (Rs, in Crore) |
Period to which the amount relates |
Forum where dispute is pending |
The Central Excise Act,1944 |
Demand on account of incorrect duty credit/short payment |
0.47 |
0.04 |
1991-92 to 1996-97 |
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal |
Finance Act,1994 |
Service tax demand on RTU activation and penalty thereon |
0.50 |
0.05 |
2006-07, 2007-08 & 2011-12 |
Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax - Appeals |
Finance Act,1994 |
Service tax demand on RTU activation and penalty thereon |
4.17 |
0.35 |
2003-04 to 2006-07 |
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal |
Finance Act,1994 |
Service tax demand on Royalty payment |
0.74 |
- |
2004-05 to 2006-07 |
Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax - Appeals |
Finance Act,1994 |
Excise Duty on CT 3 Clearance and Incorrect Input Tax Credit of Service Tax paid on Foreign Service Provider |
4.73 |
0.05 |
2003-04 to 2007-08 |
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal |
Finance Act,1994 |
Service tax demand along with penalty on excess cenvat utilization |
7.04 |
0.50 |
2004-05 to 2007-08 |
Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax - Appeals |
The Customs Act,1962 |
Demand for the payment of custom duty on Royalty Payments |
6.60 |
- |
Various Financial Years |
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal |
Finance Act,1994 |
Interest and penalty on Service tax payable under reverse charge as a recipient of foreign service |
0.06 |
0.03 |
2005-06 |
Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax - Appeals |
West Bengal Sales Tax,1994 |
Interest on Works Contract tax / Sales tax |
0.03 |
- |
2003-04, 2005-06 & 2006-07 |
Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, West Bengal |
Kerala Value added Tax act, 2003 |
Differential VAT rate demand |
0.08 |
- |
2008-09 |
Kerala VAT Tribunal |
Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008 |
VAT and interest payable on the basis of regular assessment |
0.28 |
0.08 |
2008-09 |
Additional Commissioner Appeals |
Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 |
Demand on account of disallowance of Works Contract Tax, TDS credit and applicability of VAT on service tax |
0.09 |
0.02 |
2009-10 |
Joint Commissioner of Sales Tax Appeals |
Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 |
Non-submissions of F-forms |
0.05 |
0.02 |
2011-12 |
Assistant Commissioner Appeals |
Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 |
Non-submissions of F-forms |
0.03 |
0.01 |
2009-10 |
Assistant Commissioner Appeals |
Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 |
Demand on account of disallowance of Works Contract Tax, TDS credit and applicability of VAT and service tax |
0.54 |
0.20 |
2008-09 |
Joint Commissioner of Sales Tax Appeals |
Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 |
Demand on account of disallowance of Works contract Tax, TDS credit and applicability of VAT and service tax |
0.13 |
0.08 |
2010-11 |
Joint Commissioner of Sales Tax Appeals |
Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 |
Demand on account of disallowance of Works contract Tax, TDS credit and applicability of VAT and service tax |
0.18 |
'' |
2011-12 |
Joint Commissioner of Sales Tax Appeals |
Gujarat Value added tax act, 2003 |
Demand on Non-receipt of statutory forms |
0.74 |
- |
2011-12 |
Gujarat VAT Tribunal |
Income Tax Act, 1961 |
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 |
0.62 |
0.62 |
2003-04 |
Income tax Appellant Tribunal (ITAT) |
Income Tax Act, 1961 |
Tax and penalty on deferred revenue treated as revenue |
13.01 |
13.01 |
2004-05 |
Income tax Appellant Tribunal (ITAT) |
Income Tax Act, 1961 |
Tax and penalty on deferred revenue treated as revenue |
2.13 |
2.13 |
2005-06 |
Income tax Appellant Tribunal (ITAT) |
Income Tax Act, 1961 |
Tax and penalty on deferred revenue treated as revenue |
5.12 |
5.12 |
2006-07 |
Income tax Appellant Tribunal (ITAT) |
Name of the statute |
Nature of dues |
Amount (Rs, in Crore) |
Amount Paid Under Protest (Rs, in Crore) |
Period to which the amount relates |
Forum where dispute is pending |
Income Tax Act, 1961 |
Penalty levied on concealment of Income u/s 271(1)(C) |
0.28 |
0.28 |
2007-08 |
Commissioner of Income tax (Appeal) |
Income Tax Act, 1961 |
Tax and penalty on deferred revenue treated as revenue |
5.53 |
5.53 |
2009-10 |
Commissioner of Income tax (Appeal) |
Income Tax Act, 1961 |
Tax and penalty on deferred revenue treated as revenue |
5.00 |
- |
2011-12 |
Dispute Resolution Panel |
Income Tax Act, 1961 |
Penalty levied on concealment of Income u/s 271(1)(C) |
1.89 |
- |
2008-09 |
Commissioner of Income tax (Appeal) |
(viii) The Company has not defaulted in repayment of loans or borrowings to any bank or financial institution or government during the year. The Company did not have any outstanding debentures during the year.
(ix) The Company did not raise moneys by way of initial public offer or further public offer (including debt instruments).The Company did not raise any term loan during the year. Accordingly provisions of clauses 3(ix) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.
(x) No fraud by the Company or on the Company by its officers or employees has been noticed or reported during the period covered by our audit.
(xi) Managerial remuneration for the year ended 31 March 2016 has been paid and provided in accordance with the requisite approvals mandated by the provisions of section 197 of the Act read with Schedule V to the Act.
(xii) In our opinion, the Company is not a Nidhi Company. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 3(xii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.
(xiii) In our opinion, all transactions with the related parties are in compliance with sections 177 and 188 of Act, where applicable, and the requisite details have been disclosed in the financial statements, etc., as required by the applicable accounting standards.
(xiv) During the year, the Company has not made any preferential allotment or private placement of shares or fully or partially convertible debentures.
(xv) In our opinion, the Company has not entered into any non-cash transactions with directors or persons connected with them.
(xvi) The Company is not required to be registered under section 45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934.
Annexure II
Independent Auditorâs Report on the Internal Financial Controls under Clause (i) of Sub-section 3 of Section 143 of the
Companies Act, 2013 (âthe Actâ)
1. I n conjunction with our audit of the standalone financial statements of AGC Networks Limited (âthe Companyâ) as of and for the year ended 31 March 2016, we have audited the internal financial controls over financial reporting (IFCoFR) of the Company as of that date.
Managementâs Responsibility for Internal Financial Controls
2. The Companyâs Board of Directors is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal financial controls based on internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (the âGuidance Noteâ). These responsibilities include the design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls that were operating effectively for ensuring the orderly and efficient conduct of the companyâs business, including adherence to companyâs policies, the safeguarding of its assets, the prevention and detection of frauds and errors, the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, and the timely preparation of reliable financial information, as required under the Act.
Auditorsâ Responsibility
3. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companyâs IFCoFR based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing, issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) and deemed to be prescribed under section 143(10) of the Act, to the extent applicable to an audit of IFCoFR, and the Guidance Note issued by the ICAI. Those Standards and the Guidance Note require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether adequate IFCoFR were established and maintained and if such controls operated effectively in all material respects.
4. Our audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the adequacy of the IFCoFR and their operating effectiveness. Our audit of IFCoFR included obtaining an understanding of IFCoFR, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. The procedures selected depend on the auditorâs judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error.
5. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our qualified opinion on the Companyâs IFCoFR.
Meaning of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting
6. A companyâs IFCoFR is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companyâs IFCoFR includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companyâs assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Inherent Limitations of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting
7. Because of the inherent limitations of IFCoFR, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of the IFCoFR to future periods are subject to the risk that IFCoFR may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Basis of Qualified Opinion
8. I n our opinion, according to the information and explanations given to us and based on our audit, the following material weakness has been identified in the operating effectiveness of the Companyâs IFCoFR as at 31 March 2016:
The Companyâs internal financial control over evaluation of accounting of non-routine transactions was not operating effectively. This has, during the year, resulted in non-reversal of transaction for sale of properties recorded in the previous year due to inappropriate evaluation of timing of transfer of risk and reward. This has led to misstatements of long-term loans and advances, tangible assets, other current assets, other current liabilities, prior period items, tax expense and resultant impact on the loss before tax and the reserves and surplus as at and for the year ended 31 March 2016.
9. A âmaterial weaknessâ is a deficiency or a combination of deficiencies in IFCoFR, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the companyâs annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
Qualified Opinion
10. I n our opinion, the Company has, in all material respects, maintained adequate IFCoFR as at 31 March 2016, based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance note, and except for the effects of the material weakness described above in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph, the Companyâs IFCoFR were operating effectively as at 31 March 2016.
11. We have considered the material weakness identified and reported above in determining the nature, timing and extent of audit test applied in our audit of the 31 March 2016 standalone financial statements of the Company and the material weakness has affected our opinion on the standalone financial statements of the Company and we have issued a qualified opinion on the standalone financial statements.
For Walker Chandiok & Co LLP
(Formerly Walker, Chandiok & Co)
Chartered Accountants
Firmâs Registration No.: 001076N/N500013
per Adi P. Sethna
Partner
Membership No.: 108840
Place : Mumbai
Date : 19 May 2016
Mar 31, 2015
1. We have audited the accompanying standalone financial statements of
AGC Networks Limited. ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance
Sheet as at 31 March 2015, the Statement of Profit and Loss, the Cash
Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of the
significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Management's Responsibility for the Standalone Financial Statements
2. The Company's Board of Directors is responsible for the matters
stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act")
with respect to the preparation of these standalone financial
statements, that give a true and fair view of the financial position,
financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with
the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the
Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with
Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014 (as amended). This
responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records
in accordance with the provisions of the Act; safeguarding the assets
of the Company; preventing and detecting frauds and other
irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting
policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and
prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate
internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for
ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records,
relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial
statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditor's Responsibility
3. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these standalone
financial statements based on our audit.
4. We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting
and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in
the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made
thereunder.
5. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing
specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require
that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the standalone financial
statements are free from material misstatement.
6. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence
about the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. The
procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the
assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial
statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk
assessments, the auditor considers internal financial controls relevant
to the Company's preparation of the financial statements that give a
true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing
an opinion on whether the Company has in place an adequate internal
financial controls system over financial reporting and the operating
effectiveness of such controls. An audit also includes evaluating the
appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness
of the accounting estimates made by the Company's Directors, as well
as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.
7. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient
and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the
standalone financial statements.
Basis for Qualified Opinion
8. As stated in Note 28(d) to the financial statements, during the year
the Company has recognized sale of properties having aggregate carrying
value of Rs 1.09 crores and profit on such sale amounting to Rs.46.04
crores (net of incidental selling expenses amounting to Rs 3.39 crores)
under 'exceptional items'. In our opinion, as the significant risks
and rewards for the said property have not been transferred during the
year ended 31 March 2015, recognition of such sale is not in accordance
with the principles laid under Accounting Standard (AS) 9 Revenue
Recognition. Had the Company not recognized such sale, loss after tax
for the year ended 31 March 2015 would have been higher by Rs 46.04
crores; tax expense would have been lower by Rs 3.27 crores;
non-current loans and advances would have been higher by Rs 3.27 crores
and the reserves and surplus, other current assets and other current
liabilities as at that date would have been lower by Rs 42.77 crores,
Rs 50.52 crores and Rs 3.39 crores, respectively. Further the carrying
value of tangible assets as at 31 March 2015 would have been higher by
Rs 1.09 crores.
Qualified Opinion
9. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, except for the effects of the matter
described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph, the aforesaid
standalone financial statements give the information required by the
Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in
conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India,
of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31 March 2015, and its
loss and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.
Other Matter
10. The audit of financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2014,
included in the Statement was carried out and reported by S.R. Batliboi
& Associates LLP vide their qualified audit report dated 30 May 2014
respectively, whose audit report has been furnished to us and which has
been relied upon by us for the purpose of our audit of the Statement.
Our audit report is not qualified in respect of this matter.
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
11. As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2015
("the Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of
Section 143(11) of the Act, we give in the Annexure a statement on the
matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.
12. As required by Section 143(3) of the Act, we report that:
a. we have sought and obtained all the information and explanations
which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the
purpose of our audit;
b. except for the effects of the matter described in the Basis for
Qualified Opinion paragraph, in our opinion proper books of account as
required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from
our examination of those books;
c. the standalone financial statements dealt with by this report are in
agreement with the books of account;
d. except for the effects of the matter described in the Basis for
Qualified Opinion paragraph, in our opinion, the aforesaid standalone
financial statements comply with the Accounting Standards specified
under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies
(Accounts) Rules, 2014 (as amended);
e. On the basis of the written representations received from the
directors as on 31 March 2015 and taken on record by the Board of
Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31 March 2015
from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164(2) of the
Act;
f. With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor's
Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors)
Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and
according to the explanations given to us:
i. as detailed in Note 36 to the standalone financial statements, the
Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its
standalone financial position
ii. The Company did not have any long-term contracts including
derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable
losses;
iii. There has been no delay in transferring amounts, required to be
transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the
Company.
Annexure to the Independent Auditor's Report of even date to the
members of AGC Networks Limited on the standalone financial statements
for the year ended 31 March 2015
Based on the audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting a
true and fair view on the financial statements of the Company and
taking into consideration the information and explanations given to us
and the books of account and other records examined by us in the normal
course of audit, we report that:
(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
(b) The fixed assets have been physically verified by the management
during the year and no material discrepancies were noticed on such
verification. In our opinion, the frequency of verification of the
fixed assets is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and
the nature of its assets.
(ii) (a) The management has conducted physical verification of
inventory at reasonable intervals during the year, except for goods in
transit and stocks lying with customers.
(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by
the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of
the Company and the nature of its business.
(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory and no
material discrepancies between physical inventory and book records were
noticed on physical verification.
(iii) The Company has not granted any loan, secured or unsecured to
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained
under Section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013 (the Act). Accordingly,
the provisions of clauses 3(iii)(a) and 3(iii)(b) of the Order are not
applicable.
(iv) In our opinion, there is an adequate internal control system
commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its
business for the purchase of fixed assets and for the sale of goods and
services. In our opinion, there is no continuing failure to correct
major weakness in the internal control system.
(v) The Company has not accepted any deposits within the meaning of
Sections 73 to 76 of the Act and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits)
Rules, 2014 (as amended). Accordingly, the provisions of clause 3(v) of
the Order are not applicable.
(vi) To the best of our knowledge and belief, the Central Government
has not specified maintenance of cost records under sub-section (1) of
Section 148 of the Act, in respect of Company's products and
services. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 3(vi) of the Order are
not applicable.
(vii) (a) Undisputed statutory dues including provident fund,
employees' state insurance, income-tax, sales- tax, wealth tax,
service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value added tax, cess and
other material statutory dues, as applicable, have generally been
regularly deposited with the appropriate authorities, though there has
been a slight delay in a few cases. Further, no undisputed amounts
payable in respect thereof were outstanding at the year-end for a
period of more than six months from the date they became payable
(b) The dues outstanding in respect of income-tax, sales-tax, wealth
tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value added tax and
cess on account of any dispute, are as follows:
Annexure to the Independent Auditor's Report of even date to the
members of AGC Networks Limited on the standalone financial statements
for the year ended 31 March 2015
Name of the Nature of dues Amount (Rs. Amount Paid
statute in crores) Under Protest
(Rs. in crores)
The Central Excise Demands on account of 0.47 0.04
Act, 1944 incorrect duty credit
/ short payment
Finance Act, 1994 Service tax on RTU acti 0.40 0.05
vation and penalty thereon
Finance Act, 1994 Service tax on RTU acti 4.17 0.35
vation and penalty thereon
Finance Act, 1994 Service tax Demand on 0.74 -
Royalty Payment
Finance Act, 1994 Excise Duty on CT 3 4.73 0.05
Clearance and Incorrect
Input Tax Credit of
Service Tax paid on Foreign
Service Provider
Finance Act, 1994 Service tax demand along 7.04 0.50
with penalty on excess
CEN VAT utilization
The Customs Act, Demand of payment of 6.60 -
1962 Customs Duty on Royalty
Payments
Finance Act, 1994 Interest and Penalty on 0.06 0.03
Service tax payable under
reverse charge as a
Recipient of Foreign
Service
West Bengal Sales Interest on works Contract 0.03 -
Tax Act, 1994 tax/Sales tax
Kerala Value Differential VAT rate demand 0.08 -
Added Tax Act,
2003
Gujarat Value VAT & Interest payable 0.22 0.01
Added Tax Act, on the basis of Regular
2003 Assessment
Uttar Pradesh VAT & Interest payable 0.28 0.08
Value Added Tax on the basis of Regular
2008 Assessment Act,
Maharashtra Value Demand on account of 0.09 0.02
Added Tax Act, disallowance of Works
2002 Contract Tax TDS credit
and applicability of
VAT on service tax
Kerala Value Non - Submission of F- 0.05 0.02
Added Tax Act, Forms
2003
Kerala Value Non - Submission of F- 0.03 0.01
Added Tax Act, forms
2003
Maharashtra Value Demand on account of 0.54 0.20
Added Tax Act, disallowance of Works
2002 Contract Tax TDS credit
and applicability
of VAT on service tax
Income Tax Tax and Penalty on 21.00 14.83
Act, 1961 Defferred revenue
treated as revenue
based on Billing
Name of the Statute Period to which the Forum where
amount relates dispute is pending
The Central Excise Act, 1991-92 to 1996-97 Customs, Excise & Service
1944 Tax Appellate Tribunal
Finance Act, 1994 2006-07 and 2007-08 Joint Commissioner of
Central Excise
Finance Act, 1994 2003- 04 to 2006-07 Customs, Excise
& Service Tax Appellate
Tribunal
Finance Act, 1994 2004- 05 to 2006-07 Commissioner of
Central Excise & Service
tax Appeals
Finance Act, 1994 2003- 04 to 2007-08 Customs, Excise
& Service Tax Appellate
Tribunal
Finance Act, 1994 2004- 05 to 2007-08 Commissioner of
Central Excise
The Customs Act, 1962 Various financial Customs, Excise
Years & Service Tax
Appellate Tribunal
Finance Act 1994 2005-06 Commissioner of
Central Excise - Appeals
West Bengal Sales 2003-04, Assistant
Tax Act 1994 2005-06 and 2006-07 Commissioner
Commercial Taxes
Kerala Value 2008-09 Karnataka VAT
Added Tax Act Tribunal
2003
Gujarat Value 2008-09 Joint Commissioner
Added Tax Act Of
2003 Commercial Tax
Uttat Pradesh 2008-09 Additional
Value Added Tax Commissioner
Act 2008 Appeals
Maharastra Value 2002-03 Joint Commissioner
Added Tax Act of Sales Tax Appeals
2002
Kerala Value 2011-12 Assistant
Added Tax Act Commissioner
2003 Appeals
Kerala Value 2008-09 Assistant
Added Tax Act Commissioner
2003 Appeals
Maharashtra Value 2008-09 Joint Commissioner
Added Tax Act of Sales Tax
2002
Income Tax 2004-05, 2005-06, CIT (A) for FY 2009-
Act 1961 2007-08, 2009-10, 10 and 2010-11
2010-11 and ITAT for other
financial years.
(c) The Company has transferred the amount required to be transferred
to the investor education and protection fund in accordance with the
relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) and rules
made thereunder within the specified time.
(viii) In our opinion and after considering the effect of the
qualification stated in paragraph 8 of the Independent Auditors Report
on the figures of accumulated losses, net-worth and cash losses, the
Company's accumulated losses at the end of the financial year are
more than fifty percent of its net worth. The Company has incurred cash
losses in the current and the immediately preceding financial year.
(ix) The Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to any bank.
The Company did not have any loans from financial institutions or any
outstanding debentures during the year.
(x) In our opinion, the terms and conditions on which the Company has
given guarantee for loans taken by others from banks or financial
institutions are not, prima facie, prejudicial to the interest of the
Company.
(xi) In our opinion, the Company has applied the term loan for the
purpose for which the loan was obtained.
(xii) No fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during
the period covered by our audit.
For Walker Chandiok & Co LLP
(Formerly Walker, Chandiok & Co)
Chartered Accountants
Firm's Registration No.: 001076N/N500013
per Adi P. Sethna
Partner
Membership No.: 108840
Place : Mumbai
Date : 27 May 2015
Mar 31, 2014
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of AGC Networks
Limited ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at March
31, 2014, and the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement
for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting
policies and other explanatory information.
Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial
statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position,
financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the
Accounting Standards notified under the Companies Act, 1956, read with
General Circular 8/2014 dated 4 April 2014 issued by the Ministry of
Corporate Affairs. This responsibility includes the design,
implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the
preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a
true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due
to fraud or error.
Auditor''s Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance
with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with
ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures
selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of
the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether
due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor
considers internal control relevant to the Company''s preparation and
fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances but not for the
purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity''s
internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness
of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
presentation of the financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and
appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Basis for Qualified Opinion
The Company has certain trade and other receivables aggregating to Rs.
85 million, which in our opinion are doubtful of recovery. Had the
company recorded a provision for these receivables in the financial
statements, the loss after tax for the year would have been higher by
Rs. 85 million, trade and other receivables and reserves and surplus
would have been lower by Rs. 85 million.
Opinion
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the
explanations given to us, except for the possible effects of the matter
described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion, the financial statements
give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act") in
the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with
the accounting principles generally accepted in India:
(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at March 31, 2014;
(b) in the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the loss for
the year ended on that date; and
(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the
year ended on that date.
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 ("the
Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of
sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Act, we give in the Annexure a
statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.
2. As required by section 227(3) of the Act, we report that:
(a) We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit;
(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of
those books;
(c) The Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of
account;
(d) In our opinion, except for the possible effects of the matter
stated in the basis for qualified opinion, the Balance Sheet, the
Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash Flow Statement comply with
the Accounting Standards notified under the Companies Act, 1956, read
with General Circular 8/2014 dated 4 April 2014 issued by the Ministry
of Corporate Affairs;
(e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors
as on March 31, 2014, and taken on record by the Board of Directors,
none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2014, from being
appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of
section 274 of the Act.
Annexure to the Independent Auditors'' Report
Re: AGC Networks Limited
Referred to in Paragraph 1 under the heading "Report on other legal and
regulatory requirements" of our report of even date
(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
(b) Fixed assets have been physically verified by the management during
the year and no material discrepancies were identified on such
verification.
(c) There was no disposal of a substantial part of fixed assets during
the year.
(ii) (a) The management has conducted physical verification of
inventory at reasonable intervals during the year.
(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by
the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of
the Company and the nature of its business.
(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory and no
material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification carried
out during the year.
(iii) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us,
the Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Act. Accordingly, the provisions of clause
4(iii)(a) to (d) of the Order are not applicable to the Company and
hence not commented upon, (b) According to information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured,
from companies, firms or other parties covered in the register
maintained under section 301 of the Act. Accordingly, the provisions of
clause 4(iii)(e) to (g) of the Order are not applicable to the Company
and hence not commented upon, (iv) In our opinion and according to the
information and explanations given to us, there is an adequate internal
control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature
of its business, for the purchase of fixed assets. However, internal
control system for purchases of inventory and sale of goods and
services is inadequate since some of these were inappropriately
recognised in earlier years and have been reversed in the current year.
Except for the above, during the course of our audit, we have not
observed any major weakness or continuing failure to correct any major
weakness in the internal control system of the Company in respect of
these areas.
(v) (a) In our opinion, there are no contracts or arrangements that
need to be entered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the
Act. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(v)(b) of the Order is not
applicable to the Company and hence not commented upon.
(vi) The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public.
(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system
commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
(viii) To the best of our knowledge and as explained, the Central
Government has not prescribed maintenance of cost records under clause
(d) of sub-section (1) of section 209 of the Act for the products of
the Company.
(ix) (a) The Company is regular in depositing with appropriate
authorities undisputed statutory dues including employees'' state
insurance, income-tax, wealth-tax, service tax, customs duty, excise
duty, cess and other material statutory dues applicable to it, except
for profession tax and investor education and protection fund where
there has been slight delays in few cases. (b) According to the
information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable
in respect of provident fund, employees'' state insurance, income-tax,
wealth-tax, service tax, sales-tax, customs duty, excise duty cess and
other material statutory dues were outstanding, at the year end, for a
period of more than six months from the date they became payable,
except investor education and protection fund which were outstanding,
at the year end, for a period of more than six months from the date
they become payable, are as follows:
Name of the statute Nature of dues Amount Period to
(Rs. Millions) which the
amount
relates
Companies Act, 1956 Investor Education 0.36 2005-2006
and Protection Fund
Name of the Statute Due Date Date of
Payment
Companies Act 1956 30-09-2013 21-05-2014
(c) According to the records of the Company, the dues outstanding of
income-tax, sales-tax, wealth-tax, service tax, customs duty, excise
duty and cess on account of any dispute, are as follows:
Name of the Nature of dues Amount
statute (Rs. Millions)
The Central Demands on account of 4.31
Excise Act, incorrect duty credit / short
1944 payment
Finance Act, Service tax on RTU activation 3.52
1994 and penalty thereon
Finance Act, Service tax on RTU activation 38.20
1994 and penalty thereon
Finance Act, Interest and Penalty on 0.30
1994 Service tax payable under
reverse charge as a Recipient
of Foreign Service
Finance Act, Service tax Demand on 7.41
1994 Royalty Payment
The Customs Demand of payment of 66.00
Act, 1962 Customs Duty on Royalty
Payments
Finance Act, Excise Duty on CT 3 46.80
1994 Clearance and Incorrect
Input Tax Credit of
Service Tax paid on
Foreign Service Provider
Finance Act, Service tax demand along 65.40
1994 with penalty on excess
CENVAT utilization
West Bengal Interest on works Contract 0.29
Sales Tax Act, tax/Sales tax
1994
Kerala Value Differential VAT rate demand 0.80
Added Tax
Act, 2003
Gujarat Value VAT & Interest payable
on the 2.07
Added Tax basis of Regular Assessment
Act, 2003
Uttar Pradesh VAT & Interest payable on the 1.96
Value Added basis of Regular Assessment
Tax Act, 2008
Income Tax Tax and Penalty on Deferred 120.81
Act, 1961 revenue treated as revenue
based on Billing
Name of the Statute Period to which Forum where dispute is
the amount relates pending
The Central Excise
Act, 1944 1991-92 to 1996-97 Customs, Excise & Service
Tax Appellate Tribunal
Finance Act, 1994 2006-07 and 2007- Joint Commissioner of
08 Central Excise
Finance Act, 1994 2003-04 to 2006-07 Customs, Excise & Service
Tax Appellate Tribunal
Finance Act, 1994 2005-06 Commissioner of Central
Excise - Appeals
Finance Act, 1994 2004-05 to 2006-07 Commissioner of Central
Excise & Service
tax Appeals
The Customs Act, 1962 Various financial Customs, Excise & Service
years Tax Appellate Tribunal
Finance Act, 1994 2003-04 to 2007-08 Customs, Excise & Service
Tax Appellate Tribunal
Finance Act, 1994 2004-05 to 2007-08 Commissioner of Central
Excise
West Bengal Sales
Tax Act, 1994 2003-04, Assistant Commissioner
2005-06 and 2006- Commercial Taxes
07
Kerala Value Added
Tax Act, 2003 2008-09 Karnataka VAT Tribunal
Gujarat Value Added
Tax Act, 2003 2008-09 Joint Commissioner Of
Commercial Tax
Uttar Pradesh
Value Added
Tax Act, 2008 2008-09 Additional Commissioner-
Appeals
Income TaxAct, 1961 2006-2007, 2008- CIT (Appeals)
2009,2010-2011
(x) The Company''s accumulated losses at the end of the financial year
are more than fifty percent of its net worth. The Company has incurred
cash loss during the year. In the immediately preceding financial year,
the Company had not incurred cash loss.
(xi) Based on our audit procedures and as per the information and
explanations given by the management, we are of the opinion that the
Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to a financial
institution, bank or debenture holders.
(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us and
based on the documents and records produced to us, the Company has not
granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of
shares, debentures and other securities.
(xiii) In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi /
mutual benefit fund / society. Therefore, the provisions of clause
4(xiii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.
(xiv) In our opinion, the Company is not dealing in or trading in
shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the
provisions of clause 4(xiv) of Order are not applicable to the Company.
(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has given guarantee for loans taken by others from banks, the
terms and conditions whereof, in our opinion, are not prima-facie
prejudicial to the interest of the Company.
(xvi) Based on the information and explanations given to us by the
management, term loans were applied for the purpose for which the loans
were obtained.
(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on
an overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, we report
that funds amounting to Rs. 546 million raised on short term basis in
the form of cash credit facility from banks have been used for
long-term investment representing acquisition of fixed assets and
funding of losses.
(xviii)The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to
parties or companies covered in the register maintained under section
301 of the Act.
(xix) The Company did not have any outstanding debentures during the
year.
(xx) The Company has not raised any money by public issues during the
year.
(xxi) Based upon the audit procedures performed for the purpose of
reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and as per
the information and explanations given by the management, we are not
aware of any fraud on or by the Company noticed or reported during the
year except that the management of the Company has identified certain
instances of inappropriate recognition of revenue and costs during the
earlier years aggregating to Rs. 180 million and Rs. 36 million
respectively which have been reversed during the current year.
For S.R. Batliboi & Associates LLP
Chartered Accountants
ICAI Firm registration number: 101049W
per Shyamsundar Pachisia
Partner
Membership No.: 49237
Place: Mumbai
Date : 30 May 2014
Mar 31, 2013
Report on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of AGC Networks
Limited ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at March
31, 2013, and the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement
for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting
policies and other explanatory information.
Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial
statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position,
financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the
Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of
the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act"). This responsibility includes the
design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to
the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give
a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether
due to fraud or error.
Auditor''s Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance
with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with
ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures
selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of
the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether
due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor
considers internal control relevant to the Company''s preparation and
fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also
includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and
the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial
statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is
sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the
explanations given to us the financial statements give the information
required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair
view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in
India:
(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at March 31, 2013;
(b) in the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the loss for
the year ended on that date; and
(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the
year ended on that date.
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 ("the
Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of
sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Act, we give in the Annexure a
statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.
2. As required by section 227(3) of the Act, we report that:
(a) We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit;
(b) In our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been
kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those
books;
(c) The Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of
account;
(d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss,
and Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards referred
to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956;
(e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors
as on March 31, 2013, and taken on record by the Board of Directors,
none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2013, from being
appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of
section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.
Annexure to Auditors'' Report
Annexure referred to in paragraph [3] of our report of even date
Re: [AGC Networks Limited] (''the Company'')
(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
(b) Fixed assets have been physically verified by the management during
the year and no material discrepancies were identified on such
verification.
(c) There was no disposal of a substantial part of fixed assets during
the year.
(ii) (a) The management has conducted physical verification of
inventory at reasonable intervals during the year.
(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by
the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of
the Company and the nature of its business.
(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory and no
material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification carried
out at the end of the year.
(iii) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us,
the Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly. the
provisions of clause 4(iii)(a) to (d) of the Order are not applicable
to the Company and hence not commented upon.
(b) According to information and explanations given to us, the Company
has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured, from companies, firms or
other parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly. the provisions of clause
4(iii)(e) to (g) of the Order are not applicable to the Company and
hence not commented upon.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate
with the size of the Company and the nature of its business, for the
purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and
services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any
major weakness or continuing failure to correct any major weakness in
the internal control system of the Company in respect of these areas.
(v) (a) In our opinion, there are no contracts or arrangements that
need to be entered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(v)(b) of
the Order is not applicable to the Company and hence not commented
upon.
(vi) The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public.
(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system
commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
(viii) To the best of our knowledge and as explained, the Central
Government has not prescribed maintenance of cost records under clause
(d) of sub-section (1) of section 209 of the Companies Act, 1956 for
the products of the Company.
(ix) (a) The Company is regular in depositing with appropriate
authorities undisputed statutory dues including investor education and
protection fund, employees'' state insurance, income-tax, wealth-tax,
service tax, customs duty, excise duty, cess and other material
statutory dues applicable to it, except provident fund, works contract
tax and sales tax where there have been a slight delays and in case of
professional tax which have not generally been regularly deposited with
the appropriate authorities though the delays in deposit have not been
serious.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
undisputed amounts payable in respect of provident fund, investor
education and protection fund, employees'' state insurance, income-tax,
wealth-tax, service tax, sales-tax, customs duty, excise duty cess and
other material statutory dues were outstanding, at the year end, for a
period of more than six months from the date they became payable,
except professional tax which were outstanding, at the year end, for a
period of more than six months from the date they became payable, are
as follows:
Name of statue Nature of dues Amount
(in Rs.)
Gujarat Professional
Tax act 1976 Professional Tax - 13,300
Gujarat
Professions, Trades
Callings, and Professional Tax - 81,945
Employment''s Act,
1992 (Tamil Nadu) Tamil Nadu
Name Period to
which the Due Date Date of
amounts
relates Payment
Gujarat Professional
Tax act 1976 Mar-12 21-Apr-12 20-May-13
Professions, Trades
Callings, and Mar-12 to
Aug-12 15-Sep-12 10-May-13
(c) According to the records of the Company, the dues outstanding of
income-tax, sales-tax, wealth-tax, service tax, customs duty excise
duty and cess on account of any dispute, are as follows:
Name of the statute Nature of dues Amount
(Rs. Millions)
The Central Excise Demands on account of 4.31
Act, 1944 incorrect duty credit /
short payment
Finance Act, 1994 Service tax on RTU activation 3.52
and penalty thereon
Finance Act, 1994 Service tax on RTU
activation 41.70
and penalty thereon
Finance Act, 1994 Interest and Penalty on 0.30
Service tax payable
under reverse charge as
a Recipient of Foreign
Service
Name Period to which the Forum where dispute is
amount relates pending
Finance Act, 1994 1991-92 to 1996-97 Customs, Excise & Service Tax
Appellate Tribunal
Finance Act, 1994 2006-07 and 2007-08 Joint Commissioner of
Central Excise
Finance Act, 1994 2003-04 to 2006-07 Customs, Excise & Service Tax
Appellate Tribunal
Finance Act, 1994 2005-06 Commissioner of Central Excise
Appeals
Name of the statute Nature of dues Amount
(Rs. Millions)
Finance Act, 1994 Service tax Demand on 7.41
Royalty Payment
The Customs Act, Demand of payment of 66.00
1962 Customs Duty on Royalty
Payments
Finance Act, 1994 Excise Duty on CT 3 46.80
Clearance and
Incorrect Input Tax
Credit of Service Tax
paid on Foreign
Service Provider
Finance Act, 1994 Service tax demand
along 70.40
with penalty on excess
CENVAT utilization
West Bengal Sales Interest on works
Contract 0.29
Tax Act, 1994 tax/Sales tax
Kerala Value Added
Differential VAT
rate demand 0.80
Tax Act, 2003
Gujarat Value
Added VAT & Interest payable
on the 2.88
Tax Act, 2003 basis of Regular
Assessment
Uttar Pradesh
Value VAT & Interest payable
on the 1.96
Added Tax Act, 2008 basis of Regular
Assessment
Name Period to which the Forum where dispute is
amount relates pending
Finance Act, 1994 2004-05 to 2006-07 Commissioner of Central
Excise & Service tax Appeals
Finance Act, 1994 Various financial
years Customs, Excise & Service
Tax Appellate Tribunal
Finance Act, 1994 2003-04 to 2007-08 Customs, Excise & Service Tax
Appellate Tribunal
Finance Act, 1994 2004-05 to 2007-08 Commissioner of Central
Excise
Finance Act, 1994 2003-04, 2005-06 and Assistant Commissioner
2006-07 Commercial Taxes
Finance Act, 1994 2008-09 Karnataka VAT Tribunal
Finance Act, 1994 2008-09 Joint Commissioner Of
Commercial Tax
Finance Act, 1994 2008-09 Additional Commissioner-
Appeals
(x) The Company has no accumulated losses at the end of the financial
year and it has not incurred cash losses in the current and immediately
preceding financial year.
(xi) Based on our audit procedures and as per the information and
explanations given by the management, we are of the opinion that the
Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to a financial
institution, bank or debenture holders.
(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us and
based on the documents and records produced to us, the Company has not
granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of
shares, debentures and other securities.
(xiii) In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi /
mutual benefit fund / society. Therefore, the provisions of clause
4(xiii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.
(xiv) In our opinion, the Company is not dealing in or trading in
shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the
provisions of clause 4(xiv) of Order are not applicable to the Company.
(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from bank
or financial institutions.
(xvi) Based on the information and explanations given to us by the
management, term loans were applied for the purpose for which the loans
were obtained.
(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on
an overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company we report
that no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term
investment.
(xviii) The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares
to parties or companies covered in the register maintained under
section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(xix) The Company did not have any outstanding debentures during the
year.
(xx) The Company has not raised any money by public issues during the
year.
(xxi) Based upon the audit procedures performed for the purpose of
reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and as per
the information and explanations given by the management, we report
that no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during
the year.
For S.R. Batliboi & Associates LLP
Chartered Accountants
ICAI Firm registration number: 101049W
per Shyamsundar Pachisia
Partner
Membership No.: 49237
Place: Mumbai
Date : 28 May 2013
Mar 31, 2012
1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of AGC Networks Limited
('the Company') as at March 31, 2012 and also the Statement of
profit and loss and the cash flow statement for the year ended on that
date annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility
of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 (as
amended) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of
sub-section (4A) of Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose
in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4
and 5 of the said Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we
report that:
i. We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit;
ii. In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of
those books;
iii. The balance sheet, statement of profit and loss and cash flow
statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account;
iv. In our opinion, the balance sheet, statement of profit and loss
and cash flow statement dealt with by this report comply with the
accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of
the Companies Act, 1956.
v. On the basis of the written representations received from the
directors, as on March 31, 2012, and taken on record by the Board of
Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on
March 31, 2012 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause
(g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.
vi. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, they said accounts give the information
required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give
a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India;
a) in the case of the balance sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at March 31, 2012;
b) in the case of the statement of profit and loss, of the profit for
the year ended on that date; and
c) in the case of cash flow statement, of the cash flows for the year
ended on that date.
Annexure to Auditors Report
Annexure referred to in paragraph [3] of our report of even date
Re: [AGC Networks Limited] ('the Company')
(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
(b) Fixed assets have been physically verified by the management during
the year and no material discrepancies were identified on such
verification.
(c) There was no substantial disposal of fixed assets during the year.
(ii) (a) The management has conducted physical verification of
inventory at reasonable intervals during the year.
(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by
the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of
the Company and the nature of its business.
(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory and no
material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification carried
out at the end of the year.
(iii) (a) According to the information and explanation given to us, the
Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to companies,
firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under section
301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly the provisions of clauses
4(iii)(a) to (d) of the order are not applicable to the Company and
hence not commented upon.
(b) According to the information and explanation given to us, the
Company has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured from companies,
firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under section
301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly the provisions of clauses
4(iii)(e) to (g) of the order are not applicable to the Company and
hence not commented upon.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate
with the size of the Company and the nature of its business, for the
purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and
services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any
major weakness or continuing failure to correct any major weakness in
the internal control system of the Company in respect of these areas.
(v) (a) In our opinion, there are no contracts or arrangements that
need to be entered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(v)(b) of
the Order is not applicable to the Company and hence not commented
upon.
(vi) The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public.
(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system
commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
(viii) To the best of our knowledge and as explained, the Central
Government has not prescribed maintenance of cost records under clause
(d) of sub-section (1) of section 209 of the Companies Act, 1956 for
the products of the Company.
(ix) (a) Undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor
education and protection fund, employees state insurance, income-tax,
sales-tax, wealth-tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty, cess
have generally been regularly deposited with the appropriate
authorities though there has been a slight delay in a few cases
relating to professional tax, works contract tax and sales tax.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
undisputed amounts payable in respect of provident fund, investor
education and protection fund, employees' state insurance,
income-tax, wealth- tax, service tax, sales-tax, customs duty, excise
duty, cess and other undisputed statutory dues were outstanding, at the
year end, for a period of more than six months from the date they
became payable.
(c) According to the records of the Company, the dues outstanding of
income-tax, sales-tax, wealth-tax, service tax, customs duty, excise
duty and cess on account of any dispute, are as follows:
Name of the Nature of dues Amount Period to which Forum where
statute (Rs.
Million) the amount
relates dispute is
pending
The Central
Excise Act, Demands on
account of 4.31 1991-92 to
1996-97 Customs,
Excise &
1944 incorrect
duty credit / Service Tax
short payment Appellate
Tribunal
Finance Act,
1994 Service tax on
RTU 3.52 2006-07 and
2007-08 Customs,
Excise &
activation and
penalty Service Tax Appel
late
thereon Tribunal
Finance
Act, 1994 Service tax on
RTU activation 7.41 2004-05 to
2006-07 Commissioner
of Service
and penalty
thereon Tax, Appeals
West Bengal
Sales Interest on
works Contract 0.29 2003-04,
2005-06 Assistant
Commissioner
Tax Act,
1994 tax/Sales tax and 2006-07 Commercial
Taxes
West Bengal
Sales VAT & Interest
payable on the 4.44 2008-09 Joint
Commissioner
Of Tax
Act, 1994 basis of an
Ex- Parte
Assessment Commercial
Tax
Kerala Value
Added Differential
VAT rate demand 0.73 2008-09 Deputy
Commissioner
of
Tax Act,
2003 Appeals
(x) The Company has no accumulated losses at the end of the financial
year and it has not incurred cash losses in the current and immediately
preceding financial year.
(xi) Based on our audit procedures and as per the information and
explanations given by the management, we are of the opinion that the
Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to a financial
institution, bank or debenture holders.
(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us and
based on the documents and records produced to us, the Company has not
granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of
shares, debentures and other securities.
(xiii) In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi /
mutual benefit fund / society. Therefore, the provisions of clause
4(xiii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.
(xiv) In our opinion, the Company is not dealing in or trading in
shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the
provisions of clause 4(xiv) of Order are not applicable to the Company.
(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from bank
or financial institutions.
(xvi) The Company did not have any term loans outstanding during the
year.
(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on
an overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, we report
that no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term
investment.
(xviii) The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares
to parties or companies covered in the register maintained under
section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(xix) The Company did not have any outstanding debentures during the
year.
(xx) The Company has not raised any money by public issues during the
year.
(xxi) Based upon the audit procedures performed for the purpose of
reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and as per
the information and explanations given by the management, we report
that no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during
the year.
For S.R. BATLIBOI & ASSOCIATES
Firm registration number: 101049W
Chartered Accountants
per Shyamsundar Pachisia
Partner
Membership No.: 49237
Place : Mumbai
Date : 10 May 2012
Mar 31, 2011
1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of AGC Networks Limited
(the Company) as at March 31, 2011 and also the Profit and Loss
account and the cash flow statement for the six months period ended on
that date annexed thereto. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 (as
amended) (the Order) issued by the Central Government of India in
terms of sub-section (4A) of Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we
enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in
paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we
report that:
i. We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit;
ii. In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of
those books;
iii. The balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash flow statement
dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;
iv. In our opinion, the balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash
flow statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting
standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the
Companies Act, 1956.
v. On the basis of the written representations received from the
directors, as on March 31, 2011, and taken on record by the Board of
Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on
March 31, 2011 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause
(g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.
vi. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information
required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give
a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India;
a) in the case of the balance sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at March 31, 2011;
b) in the case of the profit and loss account, of the profit for the
six months period ended on that date; and
c) in the case of cash flow statement, of the cash flows for the six
months period ended on that date.
Annexure referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date Re: AGC
Networks Limited (the Company)
(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
(b) Fixed assets have been physically verified by the management during
the period and no material discrepancies were identified on such
verification.
(c) There was no disposal of a substantial part of fixed assets during
the period.
(ii) (a) The management has conducted physical verification of
inventory at reasonable intervals during the period.
(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by
the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of
the Company and the nature of its business.
(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory and no
material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.
(iii) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us,
the Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, the
provisions of clauses 4 (iii) (a) to (d) of the Order are not
applicable to the Company and hence not commented upon.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured from companies,
firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under section
301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, the provisions of the
clauses 4 (iii) (e) to (g) of the Order are not applicable to the
Company and hence not commented upon.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate
with the size of the Company and the nature of its business, for the
purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and
services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any
major weakness or continuing failure to correct any major weakness in
internal control system of the company in respect of these areas.
(v) According to the information and explanations provided by the
management, in our opinion, there are no contracts or arrangements that
need to be entered in the register maintained under section 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956.
(vi) The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public.
(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system
commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
(viii) To the best of our knowledge and as explained, the Central
Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost records under
clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 209 of the Companies Act, 1956
for the products of the Company.
(ix) (a) The Company is regular in depositing with appropriate
authorities undisputed statutory dues including provident fund,
investor education and protection fund, employees state insurance,
income-tax, sales- tax, wealth-tax, service tax, customs duty, excise
duty, cess and other material statutory dues applicable to it.
Further, since the Central Government has till date not prescribed the
amount of cess payable under section 441A of the Companies Act,1956, we
are not in a position to comment upon the regularity or otherwise of
the company in depositing the same.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
undisputed amounts payable in respect of provident fund, investor
education and protection fund, employees state insurance, income-tax,
wealth-tax, service tax, sales-tax, customs duty, excise duty, cess and
other material statutory dues which were outstanding, at the period
end, for a period of more than six months from the date they became
payable.
(c) According to the records of the Company, the dues outstanding of
income-tax, sales-tax, wealth-tax, service tax, custom duty, excise
duty and cess on account of any dispute, are as follows:
Name of the Nature of dues Amount
statute (Rs. in 000)
The Central Excise Demands on account 4,310
Act, 1944 of incorrect duty credit /
short payment
Finance Act, 1994 Service tax on RTU 3,518
activation and
penalty thereon
Finance Act, 1994 Service tax on RTU 7,413
activation and
penalty thereon
West Bengal Sales Interest on works 291
Tax Act, 1994 Contract tax/Sales tax
Kerala Value Added Differential VAT 727
Tax Act, 2003 rate demand
Name of the Statue Period to which Forum where the
the amount relates dispute is pending
The Central Excise
Act, 1944 1991-92 to 1996-97 Customs, Excise &
Service Tax
Appellate Tribunal
Finance Act, 1994 2006-07 and 2007-08 Customs, Excise &
Service Tax
Commissioner Appeals
Finance Act, 1994 2004-05 to 2006-07 Commissioner of
Service Tax, Appeals
West Bengal Sales
Tax Act, 1994 2005-06 and 2006-07 Assistant Commissioner
(Commercial Taxes)
Kerala Value Added
Tax Act, 2003 2008-09 Deputy Commissioner
of Appeals
(x) The Company has no accumulated losses at the end of the financial
period and it has not incurred cash losses in the current and
immediately preceding financial year.
(xi) Based on our audit procedures and as per the information and
explanations given by the management, we are of the opinion that the
Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to a financial
institution, bank or debenture holders.
(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us and
based on the documents and records produced to us, the Company has not
granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of
shares, debentures and other securities.
(xiii) In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi /
mutual benefit fund / society. Therefore, the provisions of clause
4(xiii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.
(xiv) In our opinion, the Company is not dealing in or trading in
shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the
provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the Order are not applicable to the
Company.
(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from bank
or financial institutions.
(xvi) The Company did not have any term loans outstanding during the
period.
(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on
an overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, we report
that no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term
investment.
(xviii) The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares
to parties or companies covered in the register maintained under
section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(xix) The Company did not have any outstanding debentures during the
period.
(xx) The Company has not raised any money by public issues during the
period.
(xxi) Based upon the audit procedures performed for the purpose of
reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and as per
the information and explanations given by the management, we report
that no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during
the period.
For S.R. BATLIBOI & ASSOCIATES
Firm registration number: 101049W
Chartered Accountants
per Shyamsundar Pachisia
Partner
Membership No.: 49237
Place : Mumbai
Date : 23 May 2011
Sep 30, 2010
1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of AGC Networks Limited
(formerly Avaya GlobalConnect Limited), as at September 30, 2010, and
the related Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement for the
year ended on that date annexed thereto, which we have signed under
reference to this report. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disdosures in the financial statements. An audit ateo includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by Management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003, as
amended by the Companies (Auditors Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004,
issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A)
of Section 227 of The Companies Act, 1956 of India (the Act) and on
the basis of such checks of the books and records of the Company as we
considered appropriate and according to the information and
explanations given to us, we give in the Annexure a statement on the
matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 3
above, we report that:
(a) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit;
(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of
those books;
(c) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement
dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;
(d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash
Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting
standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of the Act;
(e) On the basis of written representations received from the
directors, as on September 30, 2010 and taken on record by the Board of
Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on September 30,
2010 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of
sub-section (1) of Section 274 of the Act;
(f) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said financial statements together
with the notes thereon and attached thereto give, in the prescribed
manner, the information required by the Act, and give a true and fair
view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in
India:
(i) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at September 30, 2010;
(ii) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the profit for the
year ended on that date; and
(iii) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the
year ended on that date.
Annexure to Auditors Report [Referred to in paragraph 3 of the
Auditors Report of even date to the members of AGC Networks Limited
(formerly Avaya GlobalConnect Limited) on the financial statements for
the year ended September 30, 2010]
1. (a) The Company is maintaining proper records showing full
particulars, including quantitative details and situation, of fixed
assets.
(b) The fixed assets of the Company have been physically verified by
the management during the year and no material discrepancies between
the book records and the physical inventory have been noticed. In our
opinion, the frequency of verification is reasonable.
(c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, a substantial part of fixed assets has not been disposed
of by the Company during the year.
2. (a) The inventory has been physically verified by the Management
during the year. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is
reasonable.
(b) In our opinion, the procedures of physical verification of
inventory followed by the Management are reasonable and adequate in
relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.
(c) On the basis of our examination of the inventory records, in our
opinion, the Company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The
discrepancies noticed on physical verification of inventory as compared
to book records were not material.
3. (a) The Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured, to
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained
under Section 301 of the Act.
(b) The Company has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured, from
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained
under Section 301 of the Act.
4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, having regard to the explanation that most items of
inventory purchased and goods and services sold are of special nature
for which suitable alternative sources do not exist for obtaining
comparative quotations, there is an adequate internal control system
commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its
business for the purchase of inventory, fixed assets and for the sale
of goods and services. Further, on the basis of our examination of the
books and records of the Company, and according to the information and
explanations given to us, we have neither come across nor have been
informed of any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in the
aforesaid internal control system.
5. According to the information and explanations given to us, there
have been no contracts or arrangements referred to in Section 301 of
the Act during the year to be entered in the register required to be
maintained under that Section. Accordingly, the question of commenting
on transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or arrangements
does not arise.
6. The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public within
the meaning of Sections 58A and 58AA of the Act and the rules framed
there under.
7. In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system
commensurate with its size and nature of its business.
8. The Central Government of India has not prescribed the maintenance
of cost records under clause (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 209 of
the Act for any of the products of the Company.
9. (a) According to the information and explanations given to us and
the records of the Company examined by us, in our opinion, the Company
is generally regular in depositing the undisputed statutory dues
including provident fund, investor education and protection fund,
employees state insurance, income- tax, sales-tax, wealth tax, service
tax, customs duty, excise duty, cess and other material statutory dues
as applicable with the appropriate authorities.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us and the
records of the Company examined by us, the particulars of dues of
sales-tax, value added tax, service tax and excise duty as at September
30, 2010 which have not been deposited on account of a dispute, are as
follows :
Name of the Nature of dues Amount
statute Rs. in 000
The Central Excise Demands on account 4,310
Act, 1944 of incorrect duty credit /
short payment
Finance Act, 1994 Service Tax on RTU 3,518
activation and penalty
theron
Finance Act, 1994 Service tax demand on 7,413
royalty and penalty
thereon
West Bengal Sales Interest on works 472
Tax Act, 1994 contract tax / sales tax
Kerala Value Added Differential VAT rate 772
Tax Act, 2003 demand
Name of the Financial year to Forum where the
Statue which the amount dispute is pending
relates
The Central Excise
Act, 1944 1991-92 to 1996-97 Customs, Excise &
Service Tax
Appellate Tribunal
Finance Act, 1994 2006-07 and 2007-08 Customs, Excise &
Service Tax
Appellate Tribunal
Finance Act, 1994 2004-05 to 2006-07 Commissioner of
Service Tax,
Appeals
West Bengal Sales
Tax Act, 1994 2003-04, 2005-06 Assistant
and 2006-07 Commissioner
(Commercial Taxes)
Kerala Value Added
Tax Act, 2003 2008-09 Deputy Commissioner
of Appeals
10. The Company has no accumulated losses as at September 30, 2010 and
it has not incurred any cash losses in the financial year ended on that
date or in the immediately preceding financial year.
11. According to the records of the Company examined by us and the
information and explanation given to us, the Company has not defaulted
in repayment of dues to any financial institution or bank or debenture
holders as at the balance sheet date.
12. The Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of
security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
13. The provisions of any special statute applicable to chit fund /
nidhi / mutual benefit fund/societies are not applicable to the
Company.
14. In our opinion, the Company is not a dealer or trader in shares,
securities, debentures and other investments.
15. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by
others from banks or financial institutions during the year.
16. The Company has not obtained any term loans.
17. On the basis of an overall examination of the balance sheet of the
Company, in our opinion and according to the information and
explanations given to us, there are no funds raised on a short-term
basis which have been used for long-term investment.
18. The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to
parties and companies covered in the register maintained under Section
301 of the Act during the year.
19. The Company has not issued any debentures.
20. The Company has not raised any money by public issues during the
year.
21. During the course of our examination of the books and records of
the Company, carried out in accordance with the generally accepted
auditing practices in India, and according to the information and
explanations given to us, we have neither come across any instance of
fraud on or by the Company, noticed or reported during the year, nor
have we been informed of such case by the Management.
For Lovelock & Lewes
Firm Registration Number: 301056E
Chartered Accountants
Sharmila A. Karve
Place: Mumbai Partner
Date: November 15, 2010 Membership Number: F43229
Sep 30, 2009
1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Avaya GlobalConnect
Limited, as at September 30, 2009, and the related Profit and Loss
Account and Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date annexed
thereto, which we have signed under reference to this report. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003, as
amended by the Companies (Auditors Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004,
issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A)
of Section 227 of The Companies Act, 1956 of India (the Act) and on
the basis of such checks of the books and records of the Company as we
considered appropriate and according to the information and
explanations given to us, we give in the Annexure a statement on the
matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 3
above, we report that:
(a) Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to Note 3 of
Schedule 20 to the financial statements. As stated therein, Managerial
remuneration for the year ended September 30, 2009 includes Rs. 0.53
crore, paid/payable to the Manager / Managing Director, subject to the
approval of the Central Government of India, for which an application
has been made. The appointment and remuneration of the Manager /
Managing Director from April 1, 2009 is also subject to the approval of
the shareholders;
(b) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit;
(c) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of
those books;
(d) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement
dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;
(e) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash
Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting
standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of the Act;
(f) On the basis of written representations received from the
directors, as on September 30, 2009 and taken on record by the Board of
Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on September 30,
2009 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of
sub-section (1) of Section 274 of the Act;
(g) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said financial statements together
with the notes thereon and attached thereto give in the prescribed
manner the information required by the Act and give a true and fair
view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in
India:
(i) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at September 30, 2009;
(ii) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the profit for the
year ended on that date; and
(iii) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the
year ended on that date.
Annexure to Auditors Report
[Referred to in paragraph 3 of the Auditors Report of even date to the
members of Avaya GlobalConnect Limited on the financial statements for
the year ended September 30, 2009]
1. (a) The Company is maintaining proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
(b) The fixed assets of the Company have been physically verified by
the management during the year and no material discrepancies between
the book records and the physical inventory have been noticed. In our
opinion, the frequency of verification is reasonable.
(c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, a substantial part of fixed assets has not been disposed
of by the Company during the year.
2. (a) The inventory has been physically verified by the management
during the year. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is
reasonable.
(b) In our opinion, the procedures of physical verification of
inventory followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in
relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.
(c) On the basis of our examination of the inventory records, in our
opinion, the Company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The
discrepancies noticed on physical verification of inventory as compared
to book records were not material.
3. (a) The Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured, to
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained
under Section 301 of the Act.
(b) The Company has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured, from
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained
under Section 301 of the Act.
4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, having regard to the explanation that most items of
inventory purchased and goods and services sold are of special nature
for which suitable alternative sources do not exist for obtaining
comparative quotations, there is an adequate internal control system
commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its
business for the purchase of inventory, fixed assets and for the sale
of goods and services. Further, on the basis of our examination of the
books and records of the Company, and according to the information and
explanations given to us, we have neither come across nor have been
informed of any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in the
aforesaid internal control system.
5. According to the information and explanations given to us, there
have been no contracts or arrangements referred to in Section 301 of
the Act during the year to be entered in the register required to be
maintained under that Section. Accordingly, commenting on transactions
made in pursuance of such contracts or arrangements does not arise.
6. The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public within
the meaning of Sections 58A and 58AA of the Act and the rules framed
there under.
7. In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system
commensurate with its size and nature of its business.
8. The Central Government of India has not prescribed the maintenance
of cost records under clause (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 209 of
the Act for any of the products of the Company.
9. (a) According to the information and explanations given to us and
the records of the Company examined
by us, in our opinion, the Company is generally regular in depositing
the undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor
education and protection fund, employees state insurance, income- tax,
sales-tax, wealth tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty, cess and
other material statutory dues as applicable with the appropriate
authorities.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us and the
records of the Company examined by us, the particulars of dues of
sales-tax, service tax and excise duty as at September 30, 2009 which
have not been deposited on account of a dispute, are as follows -
Name of the Nature of dues Amount
statute (Rs. Crores)
The Central Excise Demands on account 1.53
Act, 1944 of incorrect duty credit /
short payment
The Central Excise Service Tax, including 7.22
Act, 1944 applicable interest and
penalty thereon
West Bengal Sales Interest on works 0.04
Tax Act, 1994 contract tax / sales tax
Name of the Staute Financial year to Forum where the
which the amount dispute is pending
relates
The Central Excise
Act, 1944 1991-92 to Customs, Excise &
2002-03 Service Tax
Appellate Tribunal
The Central Excise
Act, 1944 2003-04 to Customs, Excise &
2007-08 Service Tax
Appellate Tribunal
West Bengal Sales
Tax Act, 1994 2003-04 and Assistant
2005-06 Commissioner
(Commercial Taxes)
10. The Company has no accumulated losses as at September 30, 2009 and
it has not incurred any cash losses in the financial year ended on that
date or in the immediately preceding financial year.
11. According to the records of the Company examined by us and the
information and explanation given to us, the Company has not defaulted
in repayment of dues to any financial institution or bank or debenture
holders as at the balance sheet date.
12. The Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of
security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
13. The provisions of any special statute applicable to chit fund /
nidhi / mutual benefit fund / societies are not applicable to the
Company.
14. In our opinion, the Company is not a dealer or trader in shares,
securities, debentures and other investments.
15. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by
others from banks or financial institutions during the year.
16. The Company has not obtained any term loans.
17. On the basis of an overall examination of the balance sheet of the
Company, in our opinion and according to the information and
explanations given to us, there are no funds raised on a short-term
basis which have been used for long-term investment.
18. The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to
parties and companies covered in the register maintained under Section
301 of the Act during the year.
19. The Company has not issued any debentures.
20. The Company has not raised any money by public issues during the
year.
21. During the course of our examination of the books and records of
the Company, carried out in accordance with the generally accepted
auditing practices in India, and according to the information and
explanations given to us, we have neither come across any instance of
fraud on or by the Company, noticed or reported during the year, nor
have we been informed of such case by the management.
Sharmila A. Karve
Partner
Membership Number F43229
For and on behalf of
Place: Mumbai Lovelock & Lewes
Date : November 24, 2009 Chartered Accountants
Disclaimer: This is 3rd Party content/feed, viewers are requested to use their discretion and conduct proper diligence before investing, GoodReturns does not take any liability on the genuineness and correctness of the information in this article