Nirmala Sitharaman Advocates for Bilateral Investment Treaties to Prioritise National Interest and Regulatory Powers

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman emphasised the importance of bilateral investment treaties (BITs) reflecting national interests and guiding arbitrators in dispute resolution. She spoke at the launch of a PG Certificate Course on International Commercial & Investment Treaty Arbitration in New Delhi. Sitharaman highlighted that BITs should be negotiated independently, not as part of free trade agreements, due to their unique sovereign implications.

Representative image

Currently, India is in discussions with the UK, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the European Union regarding this treaty. The government announced plans to overhaul the existing BIT model in the 2025-26 Budget to make it more attractive to investors. This move aims to foster sustained foreign investment and align with India's development goals.

Investment Treaties and National Interests

Sitharaman pointed out that arbitrators often overlook host country judicial decisions. She stressed that investment treaties should enhance regulatory powers and provide clear guidance for arbitrators. This approach aims to restore confidence in arbitration while considering national interests and circumstances.

The significance of this announcement lies in the limited acceptance of the current model tax treaty by countries. Many developed nations have reservations about its provisions, particularly concerning dispute resolution. The revamped BIT model seeks to address these concerns and attract more foreign players.

Challenges Faced by Developing Nations

According to UNCTAD reports cited by Sitharaman, there are 1,368 registered investment treaty cases. Approximately 70% of these cases target developing nations based on outdated treaties, posing challenges for these countries. Investors exploit these treaties to gain unfair advantages, which is a concern for developing economies.

Sitharaman highlighted that some well-funded parties buy cases from arbitration parties and prolong them across jurisdictions. This practice burdens sovereign states financially, often resulting in victories for wealthier parties. While not universal, such instances are reported from various developing countries.

Investor-State Dispute Settlement Concerns

The average claim amount in Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) cases is USD 1.1 billion, creating a significant burden for developing nations. Corporations use ISDS mechanisms through investment treaties to challenge government policies, environmental regulations, and public interest laws.

Sitharaman underscored the importance of having standalone BITs with experts in taxation laws and policy specialists. These treaties are crucial for maintaining sovereignty while addressing complex legal and policy issues effectively.

The government's initiative to revamp the BIT model reflects its commitment to attracting foreign investments while safeguarding national interests. By addressing concerns related to dispute resolution and regulatory powers, India aims to create a more investor-friendly environment.