Cornell sexual assault allegations raise questions over reporting delay and faculty confidence

A former Cornell University student who accused seven students of rape at a fraternity house said a remark linked to Cornell President Michael Kotlikoff left the former student feeling doubted. Cornell challenged that account. The allegation has also added to pressure on the university’s leadership. Faculty members were preparing for a possible no-confidence vote.

Representative image

The student, identified in court filings as Jane Doe, described the issue in a letter to faculty leaders. The Associated Press obtained the letter on Tuesday. The accusations have led to campus protests and a state investigation. The case relates to an alleged assault in October 2024.

Cornell President Michael Kotlikoff comment disputed in Jane Doe letter

Jane Doe wrote that a sorority president relayed a conversation with Kotlikoff from November 2024. Jane Doe said the sorority leader viewed the remark as questioning the report. "President Kotlikoff's initial response was along the lines of why did she wait so long to report it?\" Jane Doe wrote in the letter.

Jane Doe said that reported exchange reduced trust in the administration’s ability to respond well. Jane Doe wrote that the talk made Jane Doe less certain the university would show care and fairness. Jane Doe linked that concern to how the case might be handled. Cornell did not confirm Jane Doe’s version of the exchange.

Faculty Senate no-confidence vote over Cornell President Michael Kotlikoff leadership

Cornell’s dean of faculty, professor Chris Schaffer, gave a different description on Tuesday. In an email to faculty senators, Schaffer said another official present recalled a question about witnesses. Schaffer wrote that Kotlikoff asked why bystanders did not report earlier. Schaffer said the anonymous tip line existed.

Schaffer said the question focused on bystanders because claims were already spreading online. A university spokesperson also rejected Jane Doe’s account. The statement said Kotlikoff asked about bystanders’ actions, not Jane Doe’s delay. Kotlikoff did not answer an email request on Tuesday.

Schaffer said Jane Doe’s letter was not shared immediately with faculty senators. Schaffer said Schaffer waited for another account of the conversation first. Schaffer also said the letter was sent to university lawyers. Schaffer said the lawyers passed it to an independent team. The team was reviewing Cornell’s response.

Cornell President Michael Kotlikoff faces questions as sexual assault crisis debated

The letter, sent through Jane Doe’s attorney and first reported by The New York Times, arrived during a wider faculty debate. Some faculty members described an ongoing crisis of sexual assault on campus. A proposed resolution would declare no confidence in the administration. Faculty began debating it at a meeting last Wednesday.

At that meeting, Kotlikoff faced sharp questions about handling sexual assault allegations. Kotlikoff also faced scrutiny over fraternity oversight. Schaffer said at a meeting last week that Schaffer opposed the resolution. Schaffer said it listed no clear failures or fixes. Still, Schaffer acknowledged anger among staff.

\"The anger in our community is justified, and I share it.\"

The Faculty Senate was expected to continue debate on Oct. 28, before an electronic vote. Jane Doe said the letter aimed to help senators as they considered next steps. Jane Doe said the letter was not meant to influence the outcome. \"My intention is not to prescribe how the Senate should interpret this account, but rather to provide information that its members may wish to consider or investigate further,\" she wrote.

Messages seeking comment were left for Jane Doe’s lawyers, Thomas Giuffra and W. Whitney Seals. The allegations have also renewed attention on Cornell’s disciplinary process. They have drawn public focus on how reports are handled on campus. The university’s response remained under review as faculty moved towards a vote.

With inputs from PTI