Congressional oversight plans target Trump changes to the US Education Department and DEI policy

Democrats in Congress prepared to use new majorities to challenge President Donald Trump’s education agenda. The first flashpoint was the drive to dismantle the US Education Department. Trump threatened vetoes against Democratic bills. That left Democrats weighing investigations and spending limits as main tools.

Representative image

The White House gave no signal it would drop plans to close the department. It also kept backing efforts to end diversity, equity and inclusion policies. Democrats said recent Trump administration choices affected schools and universities nationwide. They planned to respond through oversight and control of federal funding.

US Education Department dismantling plans face Democratic oversight

Representative Bobby Scott of Virginia prepared to lead investigations as top Democrat on the House Committee on Education and the Workforce. Scott said he planned to leave no rock unturned. The committee could issue subpoenas and hold hearings. Scott said the panel would review department dismantling and loan oversight.

Scott said the committee would also examine the administration’s anti-discrimination approach. Under Trump, the department prioritised investigations into transgender issues. It also stepped back from work on systemic racism in schools. A day after the midterm elections, Scott sent a records letter to 10 federal agencies.

Senator Elizabeth Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat, urged Democrats to hold the Trump administration accountable. Warren focused on the move to dismantle the Department of Education. Warren also criticised what Warren described as turning its back on students. Trump officials rejected Democratic plans and defended the administration’s direction.

Education Department spokesperson Savannah Newhouse said theyre plotting to prematurely sabotage Education Secretary Linda McMahon. White House spokesperson Liz Huston accused Democrats of failing American students with disastrous leadership before Trump returned to office. Democrats said oversight would test how decisions were made and whether they met legal limits.

US Education Department funding fights and Trump veto threat

Congressional investigations could create political pressure and reveal internal processes. Still, they were unlikely to halt Trump’s education policies. Democrats also saw few paths for quick lawmaking. Trump pledged to veto Democratic bills seen as harmful. That reduced hopes for direct legislative countermeasures.

Democrats on the Senate Appropriations Committee explored using the budget process as a check. Some planned conditions on spending bills to limit parts of Trump’s education agenda. I think there will be an interest in using the power of the purse to establish guard rails and prevent these abusive practices, Senator Chris Van Hollen, a Maryland Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, told The Associated Press.

Van Hollen noted Democrats failed last year to add broad language to block further dismantling. With majorities in both chambers, Democrats prepared to try again. Van Hollen called it one option to stop the bleeding. Van Hollen said it may not undo actions already taken. Its a little harder to try to rebuild an entity just through an appropriations bill, he said.

But we can certainly try to prevent further damage and then seek to reverse the harm thats been done. Van Hollen also said lawmakers discussed conditioning federal funding in higher education. That included the White House effort to cut funds at Harvard and other prestigious universities. That said, he added, were dealing with an administration that has demonstrated no respect for the law.

US Education Department functions shifted as advocates demand reversals

Education advocates urged Democrats to press for stronger budget language. Some wanted Congress to direct the administration to reverse transfers of Education Department functions. One change moved special education programmes to the Department of Health and Human Services. Another shift placed discrimination-claim investigations under the Justice Department.

I think its going to become more and more apparent that they dont have the authority just to keep dismantling some of these offices, said Aaron Ament, president of the advocacy group Student Defence. Student Defence represented plaintiffs in a lawsuit challenging the dismantling of the Education Department. Advocates said court fights and budget limits could operate alongside oversight.

US Education Department debate widens to higher education and DEI

Some advocates wanted Congress to act on staffing and enforcement changes at the Justice Department. They hoped a new Congress could approve a replacement for Harmeet Dhillon. Dhillon, an assistant attorney general, led sweeping investigations into elite universities. Dhillon announced a resignation last Thursday after the midterms.

Education advocates also pointed to Trump’s decision promoting Stephen Miller to chief of staff. Some described Miller as the architect of hard-line policies. Meanwhile, Trump’s second term brought major changes in education policy. The Education Department’s staff was cut by nearly half. Intergovernmental agreements also moved leading duties to other agencies.

In higher education, the administration moved against DEI practices and sought to curb international enrolment. Officials used federal funding as leverage to advance White House priorities. Todd Wolfson, president of the American Association of University Professors, said the environment was so tough that endorsements were made for the first time.

Those candidates included Abdul El-Sayed, a former professor, who won Michigans open Senate seat after a bitter campaign. Wolfson said the goal was not only reversal of Trump-era actions. Wolfson also spoke of building support for free public higher education. Most other countries have figured this out, and we can too, Wolfson said. Trump’s veto power made such a shift unlikely within two years.

Education topics drew less focus during midterms shaped by economic anger and the Iran war. Democrats faced a wide oversight agenda. Education was expected to rank below issues such as Trump’s self-enrichment and federal immigration raids. Despite that, some advocates urged votes on major bills even if vetoes followed.

Even if he vetoes them, lets put the pressure on to get it to his desk, and then you see what the contrast is, said Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers union. On the right, the Heritage Foundation urged Republicans to propose a bill closing the Education Department. The group also wanted federal law stripped of mentions of the agency.

The Heritage Foundation described its effort as a last-minute bid. It said the agency failed to prove value since opening in 1980. The letter asked Republicans to collaborate with McMahon to sunset this failed bureaucracy. Democrats said they would use hearings and budget limits first, while advocates pushed for stronger steps as the fight continued.

With inputs from PTI