IMF Approves $2.4 Billion for Pakistan; Why India Chose to Abstain Instead of Voting 'No' on Pakistan Loan?
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has given the green light to a major financial assistance package for Pakistan, clearing $1 billion under its Extended Fund Facility (EFF) and an additional $1.3 billion through the Resilience and Sustainability Facility (RSF). The decision was finalised during a recent meeting of the IMF Executive Board.
However, India chose to abstain from the vote, expressing deep concerns over the move. The Indian government conveyed strong reservations, raising doubts over Pakistan's track record of utilising such aid appropriately. New Delhi pointed out that Pakistan has often diverted international funds towards activities that undermine regional peace, including state-sponsored cross-border terrorism.

IMF Approves $1 Billion Loan for Pakistan
The Executive Board of the IMF completed the first review of Pakistan's economic reform program supported by the EFF Arrangement. "This decision allows for an immediate disbursement of around $1 billion (SDR 760 million), bringing total disbursements under the arrangement to about $2.1 billion (SDR 1.52 billion). In addition, the IMF Executive Board approved the authorities' request for an arrangement under the Resilience and Sustainability Facility (RSF), with access of about US$1.4 billion (SDR 1 billion)," IMF stated.
According to reports citing sources in the Ministry of Finance, India's abstention was not a passive move but a calculated decision, accompanied by 'strong dissent' over the IMF's approval of large-scale financial support. Officials noted that Pakistan has a long history of economic mismanagement and repeated IMF bailouts, with little progress on structural reforms or policy changes.
The Indian government also highlighted the dominant role of the Pakistani military in economic affairs, which, according to New Delhi, poses a serious obstacle to any meaningful economic restructuring. Citing a 2021 United Nations report, Indian representatives noted that businesses linked to the military continue to control large segments of Pakistan's economy, undermining civilian oversight and accountability.
Adding to the apprehension, India pointed out that even the IMF had previously acknowledged political considerations in its dealings with Pakistan, which have led to cyclical bailouts without lasting improvements. This, India argued, calls into question the effectiveness of the Fund's lending practices.
India's abstention from the IMF vote was not only about economic issues but also reflected deeper geopolitical concerns. Officials criticised the IMF for treating Pakistan as "too big to fail", suggesting that constant bailouts encourage poor economic governance, as Pakistan continues to receive financial aid despite its failure to implement lasting reforms.
Why Did India Abstain Instead of Voting 'No' on Pakistan Loan?
Criticism also emerged on the domestic front. Congress MP Jairam Ramesh questioned why India did not vote against the aid package outright, arguing that a clear 'no' would have sent a more definitive message. However, officials clarified that IMF procedures permit only a vote in favour or an abstention. There was no option for a formal 'no' vote.
Why the IMF Assistance Package to Pakistan Matters
The total assistance package for Pakistan is part of a larger $7-billion support plan spread over 37 months, involving six performance reviews. Indian officials, including Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri, have urged the IMF to take into account the wider regional implications of its decisions, especially regarding long-term peace and stability in South Asia.
As the IMF aid disbursement begins, India remains cautious, reiterating the need for stringent oversight and accountability to ensure that global financial support does not inadvertently destabilise the region further.


Click it and Unblock the Notifications