Insolvency Proceedings Initiated Against ZEEL's Subhash Chandra by NCLT

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has taken a significant step by ordering insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra, a prominent figure in the media industry, following a petition from Indiabulls Housing Finance. This decision marks a pivotal moment for Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd (ZEEL), where Chandra serves as Chairman Emeritus, as he was a guarantor for a loan to Essel group's Vivek Infracon Ltd. The ruling was delivered by a two-member bench in Delhi, comprising Ashok K Bhardwaj and Subrata K Das, highlighting the tribunal's authority in handling corporate insolvency matters.

NCLT Targets ZEELs Chandra for Insolvency

While the NCLT has agreed to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against Chandra, it has concurrently dismissed similar requests from two other creditors, IDBI Trusteeship and Axis Bank. This decision underscores the tribunal's discerning approach to insolvency petitions. The detailed judgment on this matter is still pending, reflecting the complexity of insolvency proceedings.

Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd (IHFL) approached the NCLT after Vivek Infracon defaulted on a payment of approximately Rs 170 crore in 2022. Despite previous settlement discussions, no resolution was reached, prompting IHFL to seek legal recourse. The initiation of CIRP against Chandra will now place him under strict restrictions as per the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code (IBC), prohibiting him from selling or transferring any assets.

The appointment of a Resolution Professional by the insolvency tribunal is anticipated to streamline the recovery process for financial creditors. This development follows Chandra's earlier contention that personal guarantors should not be subject to insolvency proceedings—a stance that was overruled by the NCLT in May 2022. Despite challenging this decision at the appellate tribunal (NCLAT), Chandra withdrew the matter in hopes of an amicable settlement, which ultimately did not materialize.

The revival of this issue by IHFL earlier this year brings to light the amendments made to the IBC in 2019, enabling creditors to file insolvency proceedings against personal guarantors. This provision faced challenges but was upheld by the Supreme Court in November 2023, affirming the legal framework that supports creditors in their recovery efforts. This case not only highlights the evolving landscape of corporate and personal insolvency law in India but also underscores the judiciary's role in balancing the interests of creditors and debtors.

More From GoodReturns

Notifications
Settings
Clear Notifications
Notifications
Use the toggle to switch on notifications
  • Block for 8 hours
  • Block for 12 hours
  • Block for 24 hours
  • Don't block
Gender
Select your Gender
  • Male
  • Female
  • Others
Age
Select your Age Range
  • Under 18
  • 18 to 25
  • 26 to 35
  • 36 to 45
  • 45 to 55
  • 55+