National Park Service displays restored after federal judge blocks further changes under executive order

A US federal judge ordered the Trump administration to reverse changes made to public sites. The changes followed an executive order about content at museums, parks and landmarks. The judge also directed the administration to stop making further edits. The case focused on claims of censorship in National Park Service exhibits.

Representative image

US District Judge Angel Kelley in Massachusetts issued a preliminary injunction on Friday. The order required restored displays and a pause on any new removals. Kelley said the plaintiffs showed the efforts aimed to rewrite national history. The judge also required weekly status reports on the restoration work.

Trump administration executive order and National Park Service changes

President Donald Trump signed an executive order last year on exhibits at museums, parks and landmarks. The order called for sites to avoid elements that inappropriately disparage Americans past or living. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum later directed removal of what was called improper partisan ideology. The direction applied to exhibits under federal control.

The injunction followed a February lawsuit by conservation and historical organisations. The groups challenged National Park Service policies linked to the executive order. The lawsuit said staff were pushed to remove or censor dozens of exhibits. The groups said the affected content included accurate history and science, including slavery and climate change.

National Park Service exhibit removals cited in the lawsuit

Many changes were reported at Philadelphia’s Independence National Historical Park. The administration removed exhibits about nine people enslaved at the site. The exhibits described events in the 1790s under George Washington. Washington was the first US president, and the groups said the material was relevant context.

Other sites were also cited by the plaintiffs. At Sunset Crater Volcano National Monument in Arizona, a sign about basalt bubbles was removed. The sign included an image of a visitor holding a Pride flag. At Lowell National Historical Park in Massachusetts, films on labour history were removed.

Judge Angel Kelley on National Park Service history and censorship

Kelley wrote: "History cannot be faithfully told while excluding the experiences of communities whose contributions, struggles, and achievements form an important part of our Nations story,\" the judge wrote. Kelley also wrote: \"Under the guise of promoting American dignity, this Administration seeks to share a limited history by ordering the removal of all signs, displays, and interpretive exhibits at National Parks that do not align with its preferred narrative, thereby telling half-truths, Kelley wrote.\"

Kelley added that the plaintiffs showed the actions were meant to rewrite history. The judge said the efforts were like using a white-out pen on the nation’s past. The order required the Trump administration to restore altered sites. It also required weekly progress updates to the court.

National Park Service lawsuit response from conservation and ranger groups

Alan Spears, senior director for cultural resources at the National Parks Conservation Association, commented on the ruling. Spears said it will help protect parks from efforts to erase history and science. Spears said: \"National parks belong to the American people and censorship of any kind goes against the values these places represent, he said.\"

Bill Wade, executive director for the Association of National Park Rangers, also welcomed the order. Wade said the decision supported staff who aim to share unbiased information. An email seeking comment from the Interior Department was sent Saturday. The court order remains in effect while the case continues.

With inputs from PTI