Mar 31, 2015
We have audited the accompanying standalone financial statements of M/s
Indusfila Limited, ("the Company") which comprise the Balance Sheet as
at 31st March 2015, the Statement of Profit and Loss and the Cash Flow
Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of significant
accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Management's Responsibility for the Standalone Financial Statements
The Company's Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated
in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act") with respect
to the preparation of these standalone financial statements that give a
true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and
cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards
specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the
Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014. This responsibility also includes
maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the
provisions of the Act for safeguarding the assets of the Company and
for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection
and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments
and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design,
implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls,
that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and
completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and
presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view
and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditor's Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these standalone
financial statements based on our audit.
We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting
and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in
the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made
thereunder.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing
specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require
that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about
the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. The
procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the
assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial
statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk
assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant
to the Company's preparation of the financial statements that give a
true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing
an opinion on whether the Company has in place an adequate internal
financial controls system over financial reporting and the operating
effectiveness of such controls. An audit also includes evaluating the
appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness
of the accounting estimates made by the Company's Directors, as well as
evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and
appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the standalone
financial statements.
Opinion
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the
explanations given to us, the aforesaid standalone financial statements
give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and
give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as
at 31st March 2015 and its loss and its cash flows for the year ended
on that date.
Emphasis of Matter
a) Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to Note (1) of the
Notes to financial statements. The Company's operating results has been
materially affected due to various factors as at 31st March 2015, the
Company's accumulated losses has fully eroded the net worth of the
company. The appropriateness of the going concern assumption is
dependent on the company's ability to establish consistent profitable
operations as well as raising adequate finance to meet its short term
and long term obligations. As discussed in the said note, the
management believes that the going concern assumption is appropriate
and no adjustments have been made in the financial statements for the
year ended 31st March 2015.
b) Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to Note 25(k) of
the financial statements towards highlighting the negative income in
the statement of profit and loss for the year ended 31st March 2015.
c) Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to Note 25(o) of
the financial statement regarding that the management has not carried
out the impairment analysis in accordance with the requirement of
Accounting Standard-28-lmpairment of Assets" in respect of all its
units that are not in operation for last two years. In the absence of
such analysis, we are unable to comment on the carrying value of the
fixed assets and the consequential impact, if any, on the Profit/loss
for the year 2014-15.
d) Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to Note 25(p) of
the financial statements regarding that the management has not prepared
the Bank Reconciliation Statements for the banks due to
non-availability of bank statement or bank confirmation. In the absence
of such statement, we are unable to comment on the correctness of bank
balances and the consequential impact, if any, in the financial
statements for the year 2014-15.
e) Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to Note 25(q) of
the financial statements that the management has computed interest on
the term loans and cash credit accounts based on the rates of terms of
sanction due to non-availability of loan statement or confirmation. The
management believes that difference, if any, between the computed
interest and actual interest charged will not be material. In the
absence of such above information, we are unable to comment on the
interest charged and consequential impact, if any, on the profit and
loss account for the year 2014-15.
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
1. As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2015 ("the
Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of
sub-section 11 of section 143 of the Act, we give in the Annexure of
statement on the matters specified in paragraph 3 and 4 of the Order,
to the extent applicable.
2. As required by section 143(3) of the Act, we report that:
(a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations
which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the
purposes of our audit;
(b) In our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been
kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those
books;
(c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss and the Cash
Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the
books of account;
(d) In our opinion, the aforesaid standalone financial statements
comply with the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the
Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014;
(e) On the basis of the written representations received from the
directors as on 31st March, 2015 taken on record by the Board of
Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March, 2015
from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164 (2) of the
Act; and
(f) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor's
Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors)
Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and
according to the explanations given to us:
i. The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigation on its
financial position in its financial statements - Refer Note: 25 to the
financial statements.
ii. The Company did not have any long-term contracts including
derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable
losses.
iii. There were no amounts which were required to be transferred to the
Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.
ANNEXURE TO THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF
INDUSFILA LIMITED
i) a) The Company is maintaining proper records showing full
particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
b) These fixed assets have been physically verified by the management
at reasonable intervals and as explained to us, no material
discrepancies were noticed on such verification during the year.
ii) a) Physical verification of inventory has been conducted at
reasonable intervals by the management.
b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventory
followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to
the size of the Company and the nature of its business.
c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory. As explained
to us, the discrepancies noticed on physical verification were not
material and the same have been properly dealt with in the books of
account.
iii) The Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained
under Section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013. Accordingly, the
provisions stated in paragraph 3(iii)(a) and 3(iii)(b) of the Order are
not applicable.
iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has an adequate internal control system
commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its
business, for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the
sale of goods and services. We have not observed any major weakness in
the internal control system during the course of the audit.
v) The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public within the
meaning of Sections 73 to 76 or any other relevant provisions of the
Companies Act and the rules framed thereunder.
vi) We have broadly reviewed the cost records maintained by the Company
in respect of products where the Central Government has prescribed
maintenance of cost records under sub section (1) of section 148 of the
Companies Act, 2013 and are of the opinion that, prima facie the
prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have,
however, not made a detailed examination of the records with a view to
determine whether they are accurate or complete.
vii) a) The Company is not regular in depositing undisputed statutory
dues including provident fund, employees' state insurance, income tax,
sales-tax, wealth tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise,
value added tax, cess and other statutory dues with the appropriate
authorities . There are no undisputed statutory dues payable in respect
of above which were outstanding as at 31st March 2015 for a period of
more than six months from the date they became payable except for the
following.
Nature of Dues Amount outstanding Period of
Outstanding
Dividend Distribution Tax Rs 16,46,404/- A.Y 2008-09
Provident Fund Contribution Rs. 7,19,169/- F.Y 2011-12
Provident Fund Contribution Rs. 24,98,449/- F.Y 2012-13
Provident Fund Contribution Rs. 14,26,911/- F.Y 2013-14
Employees State Insurance
Corporation Rs. 47,01,239/- F.Y 2012-13
Employees State Insurance
Corporation Rs. 1,03,47,317/- F.Y 2013-14
Tax Deducted at Source Rs. 52,11,725/- A.Y 2011-12
Tax Deducted at Source Rs. 13,70,438/- A.Y 2012-13
Tax Deducted at Source Rs. 33,31,127/- A.Y 2013-14
Tax Deducted at Source Rs. 10,85,097/- A.Y 2014-15
Tax Deducted at Source Rs. 2,02,495/- A.Y 2015-16
Service Tax on reverse
Charge Rs. 32,15,768/- Before FY 2013-14
Tax collected at source Rs. 11,290/- Before FY 2013-14
Profession Tax Rs. 8,74,200/- Before FY 2013-14
b) According to the information and explanations furnished to us, the
details of disputed statutory dues are as under:
Name of the Nature of Amount
Statute dues disputed
(Rs.)
Income Tax
Act, 1961 Income Tax Rs.1670 Lakhs
Income Tax
Act, 1961 Income Tax Rs.503.5 Lakhs
Income Tax
Act, 1961 Income Tax Rs.705.3 Lakhs
Income Tax Income Tax Rs. 1769.47
Act 1961 Lakhs
Karnataka Tax Entry Tax, Rs.0.47 Lakhs
on Entry of interest and
Goods Act penalty
Karnataka KVAT, Rs.45.21 Lakhs
Value Added interest and
Tax Act 2003 penalty
CST Act 1956 CST, interest Rs.1.02 Lakhs
and penalty
CST Act 1956 CST, interest Rs. 1.01 Lakhs
and penalty
Name of the Amount Forum where
Statute Paid dispute is
(Rs.) pending
Income Tax Commissioner of
Act, 1961 Nil Income Tax
(Appeals)
Income Tax Commissioner of
Act, 1961 Nil Income Tax
(Appeals)
Income Tax Commissioner of
Act, 1961 Nil Income Tax
(Appeals)
Income Tax Commissioner of
Act 1961 Nil Income Tax
(Appeals)
Karnataka Tax Joint Commissioner
on Entry of Nil of Commercial Tax
Goods Act
Karnataka Joint Commissioner
Value Added Nil of Commercial Tax
Tax Act 2003
CST Act 1956 Joint Commissioner
Nil of Commercial Tax
CST Act 1956 Joint Commissioner
Nil of Commercial Tax
c) There were no amounts which were required to be transferred to
investor education and protection fund by the Company
viii) The accumulated losses of the Company as on 31st March 2015
exceeds more than 50% of the net worth of the Company. The Company has
incurred cash losses during the financial year and also in the
immediately preceding financial year.
ix) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has defaulted in repayment of dues to banks.
The default in respect of principal and interest is Rs. 364.99 crores.
x) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
company has given guarantee for loans taken by subsidiary company/firms
from a bank, the terms and conditions of which are not prima facie
prejudicial to the interest of the Company.
xi) According to the information and explanations given to us the
Company has applied the term loans for the purpose for which they were
obtained. No term loan has been availed during the year.
xii) During the course of examination of the books and records and
according to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on
or by the company has been noticed or reported during the year.
FOR SURI & CO
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
Firm Regn No: 004283S
(G Rangarajan)
PLACE : Bangalore Partner
DATE : 30/05/2015 M.No: 024107
Mar 31, 2014
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of M/S INDUS FILA
LIMITED, which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 31st March, 2014, the
Statement of Profit and Loss and the Cash Flow Statement for the period
then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other
explanatory information.
Management's Responsibility for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial
statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position,
financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with
the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211
of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act"). This responsibility includes
the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant
to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that
give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement,
whether due to fraud or error.
Auditor's Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance
with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with
ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures
selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of
the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether
due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor
considers internal control relevant to the Company's preparation and
fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also
includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and
the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial
statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and
appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the
explanations given to us, the financial statements give the information
required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair
view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in
India:
(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31st March, 2014;
(b) in the case of the Statement of Profit & Loss, of the LOSS for the
period ended on that date; and
(c) in the case of the Cash Flows Statement, of the cash flows for the
period ended on that date.
Emphasis of Matter
Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to Note (2) of the
financial statements. The Company's operating results has been
materially affected due to various factors and as at 31st March 2014,
the Company's accumulated losses has fully eroded the net worth of the
company. The appropriateness of the going concern assumption is
dependent on the company's ability to establish consistent profitable
operations as well as raising adequate finance to meet its short term
and long term obligations. As discussed in the said note, the
management believes that the going concern assumption is appropriate
and no adjustments have been made in the financial statements for the
period ended 31st March 2014.
Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to Note 27(j) of the
financial statements towards highlighting the negative income in the
statement of profit and loss for the period ended 31st March 2014.
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
1. As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 ("the
Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of
sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Act, we give in the Annexure a
statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.
2. As required by section 227(3) of the Act, we report that:
a. we have obtained all the information and explanations which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit;
b. in our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been
kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those
books;
c. the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash flow
Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of
account;
d. in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss and
Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards referred to in
subsection (3C) of section 211 of the Act;
e. on the basis of written representations received from the Directors,
as on 31st March, 2014, and taken on record by the Board of Directors,
we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March,
2014 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of
sub-section (1) of Section 274 of the Act.
f. Since the Central Government has not issued any notification as to
the rate at which the cess is to be paid under section 441A of the Act
nor has it issued any Rules under the said section, prescribing the
manner in which such cess is to be paid, no cess is due and payable by
the Company.
ANNEXURE TO AUDITORS' REPORT
(Referred to in our report of even date on the Accounts of INDUS FILA
LIMITED for the period ended 31st March 2014)
1) a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
b) The company's programme of physical verification of fixed assets, in
our opinion, is reasonable considering the size and nature of assets
and business. According to the information and explanation given to us,
no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.
c) The fixed assets disposed off during the period, in our opinion, do
not constitute a substantial part of fixed assets of the company.
2) a) The inventories has been physically verified by the management
under supervision by independent chartered accountants at the end of
the period.
b) According to the information and explanation given to us, the
procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the
management were reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the
company and nature of its business.
c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us, the company has maintained proper records of its
inventories. The discrepancies noticed on physical verification of
inventories as compared to the book records were not material and are
being adjusted in the books of account.
3) a) The company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. As the Company has not
granted any loans, clause (iii)(b), (iii)(c), and (iii)(d) of Paragraph
4 of the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to
the company.
b) The company has taken interest-free unsecured loans from eight
parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956. The maximum amount involved during the period was
Rs.568.54 lakhs and the period end balance of the loans taken from such
parties was Rs.568.54 lakhs.
c) Being Interest free, the loans are not prima-facie prejudicial to
the interest of the company.
d) The terms of the arrangement do not stipulate any repayment
schedule. Accordingly, paragraph 4(iii)(g) of the Order is not
applicable.
4) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there are adequate internal control procedures
commensurate with size of the company and nature of its business with
regard to purchase of inventory, fixed assets and sale of goods and
services, subject to continuing weakness relating to internal audit
system as stated in Para 7 below.
5) a) According to the information and explanations given to us, we are
of the opinion that the particulars of contracts or arrangements
referred to in section 301 of the Act have been entered in the register
required to be maintained under that section.
b) According to the information and explanations given to us and having
regard to the explanations that some the items purchased, sold are
services availed are of a special nature for which comparable
alternative price are not available, the transactions made in pursuance
of contracts or arrangements entered in the registers maintained under
section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 during the period have been made
at prices which are considered reasonable.
6) The Company had not taken any deposits within the meaning of
Sections 58A and 58AA of the Companies Act, 1956 or any other relevant
provisions of the Act and the rules framed there under.
7) The system of internal audit of the company needs to be strengthened
to commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
8) On the basis of the prima facie examination of the records of the
company, we are of the opinion that the company has made and maintained
cost records as required under section 209(1)(d) of the Companies Act,
1956. However we have not made a detailed examination of the records in
this regard.
9) a) The company is generally regular in depositing with appropriate
authorities undisputed statutory dues including Provident fund, Sales
Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other
material statutory dues wherever applicable, though there are delays in
depositing provident fund and ESI. In respect of Income tax there were
delays in depositing the undisputed dues with appropriate authorities.
b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
undisputed amounts payable in respect of Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth
Tax, Service Tax, Customs duty, Excise Duty and Cess were in arrears,
as at 31st March 2014 for a period of more than six months from the
dates they became payable except for the following.
Nature of Dues Amount outstanding Period of Outstanding
Dividend Distribution Rs 16,46,404/- A.Y 2008-09
Tax
Tax Deducted at source Rs.52,11,725/- A Y 2011-12
Tax Deducted at source Rs.1,20,16,425/- AY 2012-13
Tax Deducted at source Rs.85,74,915/- AY 2013-14
Tax Deducted at source Rs.12,55,596/- AY 2013-14
Provident Fund Rs.3,21,936/- FY 2011-12
Provident Fund Rs.1,90,79,881/- FY 2012-13
Provident Fund Rs.46,04,463/- FY 2013-14
Employee State Rs.78,35,475/- FY 2011-12
Insurance
Employee State Rs.1,47,99,110/- FY 2012-13
Insurance
Employee State Rs.27,26,414/- FY 2013-14
Insurance
c) According to the information and explanations given to us, there are
no disputed dues in respect of Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax,
Service Tax, Customs duty, Excise Duty and Cess of the company that
have not been deposited except the following
Period to
Name of the Nature of Amount of which the
statute Dues disputed tax amount
due related
Income Tax Income Tax Rs.1.95 Lakhs A.Y 2006-07
Act, 1961
Name of the Forum where dispute is
statute pending
Income Tax Commissioner of Income
Act, 1961 Tax (Appeals)
10) The accumulated losses of the company as on 31st March 2014 exceeds
more than 50% of the networth of the company. The Company has incurred
cash losses during the financial period covered by our audit and also
in the immediately preceding financial year.
11) In our opinion, the company has defaulted in the repayment of dues
to financial institutions or banks amounting to Rs.82.15 crores from
the year 2010-11
12) According to the information and explanation given to us, the
Company has not granted loans or advances on the basis of security by
way of pledge of shares, debentures and investments.
13) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company is not a chit fund / nidhi / mutual fund /
society. Therefore, provisions of clause (xiii) of Paragraph 4 of the
Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the
company.
14) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities, debentures and
other investments. Therefore, provisions of clause (xiv) of Paragraph 4
of the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to
the company.
15) The Company has given guarantees for loans from banks taken by
subsidiary company/firms, who are engaged for job works and the terms
and conditions of such guarantees in our opinion are not prejudicial to
the interest of the company.
16) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the term loans have been applied for the purposes for
which they were raised.
17) According to the information and explanations given to us and on an
overall examination of the balance sheet of the company, we report that
the company has not applied short term funds for long term purposes.
18) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the company has not made any preferential allotment of
shares to parties and companies covered in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Act during the period.
19) According to the information and explanations given to us, during
the period covered by our audit report, the company has not issued any
debentures.
20) During the period covered under audit, the company has not raised
any monies by public issues.
21) According to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud
on or by the company has been noticed or reported during the course of
our audit.
Date: 30.05.2014
Place: Bangalore
Jun 30, 2013
Report on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of M/S INDUS FILA
LIMITED, which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 30th June, 2013, the
Statement of Profit and Loss and the Cash Flow Statement for the period
then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other
explanatory information.
Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial
statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position,
financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with
the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211
of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act"). This responsibility includes
the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant
to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that
give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement,
whether due to fraud or error
Auditor''s Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance
with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with
ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures
selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of
the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether
due to fraud or error In making those risk assessments, the auditor
considers internal control relevant to the Company''s preparation and
fair presentation of the financial statements in, order to design audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also
includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and
the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial
statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and
appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the
explanations given to us, the financial statements give the information
required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair
view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in
India:
(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 30th June, 2013;
(b) in the case of the Statement of Profit & Loss, of the LOSS for the
period ended on that date; and
(c) in the case of the Cash Flows Statement, of the cash flows for the
period ended on that date.
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order; 2003 ("the
Order") issued by the
Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227
of the Act, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters
specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order
2. As required by section 227(3) of the Act, we report that:
a. we have obtained all the information and explanations which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit;
b. in our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been
kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those
books;
c. the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash flow
Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of
account;
d. in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss and
Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards referred to in
subsection (3C) of section 211 of the Act;
e. on the basis of written representations received from the
Directors, as on 30th June, 2013, and taken on record by the Board of
Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on
30th June, 2013 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause
(g) of sub-section (1) of Section 274 of the Act.
f. Since the Central Government has not issued any notification as to
the rate at which the cess is to be paid under section 441A of the Act
nor has it issued any Rules under the said section, prescribing the
manner in which such cess is to be paid, no cess is due and payable by
the Company.
(Referred to in our report of even date on the Accounts of INDUS FILA
LIMITED for the period ended 30th June 2013)
1) a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
b) The company''s programme of physical verification of fixed assets, in
our opinion, is reasonable considering the size and nature of assets
and business. According to the information and explanation given to us,
no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.
c) The fixed assets disposed off during the period, in our opinion, do
not constitute a substantial part of fixed assets of the company.
2) a) The inventories has been physically verified by the management
under supervision by independent chartered accountants at the end of
the period.
b) According to the information and explanation given to us, the
procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the
management were reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the
company and nature of its business.
c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us, the company has maintained proper records of its
inventories. The discrepancies noticed on physical verification of
inventories as compared to the book records were not material and are
being adjusted in the books of account.
3) a) The company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. As the Company has not
granted any loans, clause (iii)(b), (iii)(c), and (iii)(d) of Paragraph
4 of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order. 2003 are not applicable to
the company.
b) The company has taken interest-free unsecured loans from eight
parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956. The maximum amount involved during the period was
Rs.568.54 lakhs and the period end balance of the loans taken from such
parties was Rs.568.54 lakhs.
c) Being Interest free, the loans are not prima-facie prejudicial to
the interest of the company.
d) The terms of the arrangement do not stipulate any repayment
schedule. Accordingly, paragraph 4(iii)(g) of the Order is not
applicable.
4) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there are adequate internal control procedures
commensurate with size of the company and nature of its business with
regard to purchase of inventory, fixed assets and sale of goods and
services, subject to continuing weakness relating to internal audit
system as stated in Para 7 below.
5) a) According to the information and explanations given to us, we are
of the opinion that the particulars of contracts or arrangements
referred to in section 301 of the Act have been entered in the register
required to be maintained under that section.
b) According to the information and explanations given to us and having
regard to the explanations that some the items purchased, sold are
services availed are of a special nature for which comparable
alternative price are not available, the transactions made in pursuance
of contracts or arrangements entered in the registers maintained under
section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 during the period have been made
at prices which are considered reasonable.
6) The Company had not taken any deposits within the meaning of
Sections 58A and 58AA of the Companies Act, 1956 or any other relevant
provisions of the Act and the rules framed there undei:
7) The system of internal audit of the company needs to be strengthened
and commensurate to the size and nature of its business.
8) On the basis of the prima facie examination of the records of the
company, we are of the opinion that the company has made and maintained
cost records as required under section 209(l)(d) of the Companies Act,
1956. However we have not made a detailed examination of the records in
this regard.
9) The company is generally regular in depositing with appropriate
authorities undisputed statutory dues including Provident fund, Sales
Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other
material statutory dues where ever applicable, though there are delays
in depositing provident fund and ESI. In respect of Income tax there
were delays in depositing the undisputed dues with appropriate
authorities.
10) The accumulated losses of the company as on 30th June 2013 exceeds
more than 50% of the networth of the company. The Company has incurred
cash losses during the financial period covered by our audit and not in
the immediately preceding financial year
11) In our opinion, the company has defaulted in the repayment of dues
to financial institutions or banks amounting to Rs.52.50 crores from
the year 2010-11
12) According to the information and explanation given to us, the
Company has not granted loans or advances on the basis of security by
way of pledge of shares, debentures and investments.
13) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company is not a chit fund / nidhi / mutual fund /
society. Therefore, provisions of clause (xiii) of Paragraph 4 of the
Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order. 2003 are not applicable to the
company.
14) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities, debentures and
other investments. Therefore, provisions of clause (xiv) of Paragraph 4
of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Ordei; 2003 are not applicable to
the company.
15) The Company has given guarantees for loans from banks taken by
subsidiary company/firms, who are engaged for job works and the terms
and conditions of such guarantees in our opinion are not prejudicial to
the interest of the company.
16) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the term loans have been applied for the purposes for
which they were raised.
17) According to the information and explanations given to us and on an
overall examination of the balance sheet of the company, we report that
the company has not applied short term funds for long term purposes.
18) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the company has not made any preferential allotment of
shares to parties and companies covered in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Act during the period.
19) According to the information and explanations given to us, during
the period covered by our audit report, the company has not issued any
debentures.
20) During the period covered under audit, the company has not raised
any monies by public issues.
21) According to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud
on or by the company has been noticed or reported during the course of
our audit.
Date: 26th July 2013
Place: Bangalore
Mar 31, 2012
We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of M/S INDUS FILA LIMITED as
at 31st March 2012 and also the Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow
Statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements
based on our audit.
We conducted the audit in accordance with the auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
As required by the Companies (Auditors' Report) Order, 2003 as
amended by Companies (Auditors' Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004
issued by the Central Government in terms of sub-section (4A) of
Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a
statement on the matters specified in Paragraphs 4 and 5 of the order
to the extent applicable to this company.
Further to our comments in the annexure referred to above, we report
that:
(i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of the
audit.
(ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the company so far as appears from our examination of
those books.
(iii) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account maintained by the Company.
(iv) In our opinion the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash
Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the Accounting
Standards referred to in subsection (3C) of Section 211 of the
Companies Act, 1956
(v) Based on the declarations furnished by the Directors, taken on
record, none of the directors is disqualified to be appointed as
director under section 274 (1 )(g) of the Companies Act,1956.
(vi) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information
required by the Companies Act,1956 in the manner so required subject to
note No.8 regarding the non classification of creditors into micro,
small and medium enterprises and the consequent non disclosure under
schedule VI of the companies Act,1956 and MSMED Act 2006, and give a
true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India:
a) In the case of the Balance Sheet, of the State of affairs of the
company as at 31st March 2012
b) In the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the PROFIT for the
year ended on that date; and
c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the Cash Flows for the
year.
ANNEXURE TO AUDITORS' REPORT
(Referred to in our report of even date on the Accounts of INDUS FILA
LIMITED for the year ended 31st March 2012)
1) a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
b) The company's programme of physical verification of fixed assets,
in our opinion, is reasonable considering the size and nature of assets
and business. According to the information and explanation given to us,
no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.
c) The fixed assets disposed off during the year, in our opinion, do
not constitute a substantial part of fixed assets of the company.
2) a) The inventories has been physically verified by the management
under supervision by independent chartered accountants at the end of
the year.
b) According to the information and explanation given to us, the
procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the
management were reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the
company and nature of its business.
c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us, the company has maintained proper records of its
inventories. The discrepancies noticed on physical verification of
inventories as compared to the book records were not material and are
being adjusted in the books of account.
3) a) The company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. As the Company has not
granted any loans, clause (iii)(b), (iii)(c), and (iii)(d) of Paragraph
4 of the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable
to the company.
b) The company has taken interest-free unsecured loans from eight
parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956. The maximum amount involved during the year was
Rs.959.40 lakhs and the year end balance of the loans taken from such
parties was Rs.553..72 lakhs.
c) Being Interest free, the loans are not prima-facie prejudicial to
the interest of the company.
d) The terms of the arrangement do not stipulate any repayment
schedule. Accordingly, paragraph 4(iii)(g) of the Order is not
applicable.
4) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there are adequate internal control procedures
commensurate with size of the company and nature of its business with
regard to purchase of inventory, fixed assets and sale of goods and
services, subject to continuing weakness relating to internal audit
system as stated in Para 7 below.
5) a) According to the information and explanations given to us, we are
of the opinion that the particulars of contracts or arrangements
referred to in section 301 of the Act have been entered in the register
required to be maintained under that section.
b) According to the information and explanations given to us and having
regard to the explanations that some the items purchased, sold are
services availed are of a special nature for which comparable
alternative price are not available, the transactions made in pursuance
of contracts or arrangements entered in the registers maintained under
section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 during the year have been made
at prices which are considered reasonable.
6) The Company had not taken any deposits within the meaning of
Sections 58A and 58AA of the Companies Act, 1956 or any other relevant
provisions of the Act and the rules framed there under.
7) The system of internal audit of the company needs to be strengthened
and commensurate to the size and nature of its business.
8) On the basis of the prima facie examination of the records of the
company, we are of the opinion that the company has made and maintained
cost records as required under section 209(1 )(d) of the Companies Act,
1956. However we have not made a detailed examination of the records in
this regard.
9) a) The company is generally regular in depositing with appropriate
authorities undisputed statutory dues including Provident fund, Sales
Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other
material statutory dues where ever applicable,though there are delays
in depositing provident fund and ESI. In respect of Income tax there
were delays in depositing the undisputed dues with appropriate
authorities.
b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
undisputed amounts payable in respect of Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth
Tax, Service Tax, Customs duty, Excise Duty and Cess were in arrears,
as at 31st March 2012 for a period of more than six months from the
dates they became payable except for the following.
Nature of Dues Amount outstanding Period of Outstanding
Fringe Benefit Tax Rs.23,90,590/- A.Y 2009-10
Dividend Distribution Tax Rs 16,46,404/- A.Y 2008-09
Tax Deducted at source Rs 33,10,538/- A.Y 2011-12
Tax Deducted at source Rs 37,68,724/- A.Y 2012-13
Provident Fund Rs. 2,40,919/- A.Y-2011-12
Provident Fund Rs.19,01,190/- A.Y 2012-13
Employee State Insurance Rs. 2,33,306/- A.Y 2012-13
c) According to the information and explanations given to us, there are
no disputed dues in respect of Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax,
Service Tax, Customs duty, Excise Duty and Cess of the company that
have not been deposited except the following
Period to
Name of the Nature of Amount of which the Forum where
dispute is
statute Dues dispute tax due amount pending
related
Income Tax Rs. 1177.61 Commissioner of
Income Tax
Act, 1961 Income Tax Lakhs A.Y 2008-09 (Appeals)
Income Tax Income Tax Rs.1.95 Lakhs A.Y 2006-07 Commissioner of
Income Tax
Act, 1961 (Appeals)
10) The accumulated losses of the company as on 31st March 2012 does
not exceed 50 percent of its net worth. The Company has not incurred
Cash Losses during the financial year covered by our audit and has
incurred cash losses in the immediately preceding financial year.
11) In our opinion, the company has defaulted in the repayment of dues
to financial institutions or banks amounting to Rs.21.93 crores during
the financial year under review.
12) According to the information and explanation given to us, the
Company has not granted loans or advances on the basis of security by
way of pledge of shares, debentures and investments.
13) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company is not a chit fund / nidhi / mutual fund /
society. Therefore, provisions of clause (xiii) of Paragraph 4 of the
Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the
company.
14) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities, debentures and
other investments. Therefore, provisions of clause (xiv) of Paragraph 4
of the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to
the company.
15) The Company has given guarantees for loans from banks taken by
subsidiary company/firms, who are engaged for job works and the terms
and conditions of such guarantees in our opinion are not prejudicial to
the interest of the company.
16) In our opinion and According to the information and explanations
given to us, the term loans have been applied for the purposes for
which they were raised.
17) According to the information and explanations given to us and on an
overall examination of the balance sheet of the company, we report that
the company has not applied short term funds for long term purposes.
18) The Company has during the year, made preferential allotment of
shares to parties and companies covered in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Act. In our opinion and according to the
information and explanation given to us, the price at which the shares
have been issued are not prejudicial to the interest of the company.
19) According to the information and explanations given to us, during
the period covered by our audit report, the company has not issued any
debentures.
20) During the year covered under audit, the company has not raised any
monies by public issues..
21) According to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud
on or by the company has been noticed or reported during the course of
our audit.
Place : Bangalore For SURI & CO.,
Date : May 30, 2012
Chartered Accountants
G. Rangarajan
Partner
Firm Regn No.0042838
Mar 31, 2010
We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of M/S INDUS FILA LIMITED as
at 31st March 2010 and also the Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow
Statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements
based on our audit.
We conducted the audit in accordance with the auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 as amended
by Companies (Auditors Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004 issued by the
Central Government in terms of sub-section (4A) of Section 227 of the
Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the
matters specified in Paragraphs 4 and 5 of the order to the extent
applicable to this company. Further to our comments in the annexure
referred to above, we report that:
i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of the
audit.
ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the company so far as appears from our examination of
those books.
iii) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement
dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account
maintained by the Company.
iv) In our opinion the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash
Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the Accounting
Standards referred to in subsection (3C) of Section 211 of the
Companies Act, 1956.
v) Based on the declarations furnished by the Directors, taken on
record, none of the directors is disqualified to be appointed as
director under section 274 (1)(g) of the Companies Act,1956
vi) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information
required by the Companies Act,1956 in the manner so required subject to
Note No 8 regarding the non classification of creditors into micro,
small and medium enterprises and the consequent non disclosure under
schedule VI of the companies Act,1956 and MSMED Act 2006, and give a
true and fair. view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India:
a. in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the State of affairs of the
company as at 31st March 2010;
b. in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the LOSS for the
year ended on that date; and
c. in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the Cash Flows for the
year.
ANNEXURE TO AUDITORS REPORT
(Referred to in our report of even date on the Accounts of INDUS FILA
LIMITED for the year ended 31st March 2010) 1)
a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars
including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets
b) The companys programme of physical verification of fixed assets, in
our opinion, is reasonable considering the size and nature of assets
and business. No material discrepancies were noticed on such
verification.
c) The Company has not disposed off any major part of the assets during
the year
2)
a) The inventory has been physically verified by the management under
supervision by independent chartered accountants at the end of the
year, except in respect of value of inventories, taken over from Tulip
Apparels Private Limited consequent to the merger of the Company, which
has been verified by the Company.
b) The procedures of physical verification of stocks followed by the
management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the
company and nature of its business.
c) The company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The
discrepancies noticed on physical verification of stocks as compared to
the book records were not material and are being adjusted in the books
of account
d) The valuation of stocks is fair and proper and is in accordance with
the generally accepted accounting principles.
3)
a) The company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained
under Section 301 of the Act.
b) The company has taken interest-free unsecured loans, from companies,
firms or other parties aggregating to Rs 959.59 Lakhs (6 Parties)
covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Act.
c) Being Interest free, the loans are prima-facie not prejudicial to
the interest of the company.
d) The company is regular in the repayment of the principal amount and
interest as per terms, wherever applicable.
4) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there are adequate internal control procedures
commensurate with size of the company and nature of its business with
regard to purchase of inventory, fixed assets and sale of goods and
services, subject to continuing weakness relating to internal audit
system as stated in Para 7 below.
5)
a) According to the information and explanations given to us, we are of
the opinion that the particulars of contracts or arrangements referred
to in section 301 of the Act have been entered in the register required
to be maintained under that section.
b) According to the information and explanations given to us and having
regard to the explanations that some of the items purchased, sold or
services availed are of special nature for which comparable alternative
prices are not available, the transactions made in pursuance of
contracts or arrangements entered in the registers maintained under
Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 during the year have been made
at prices which are considered reasonable.
6) The Company had not taken any deposits within the meaning of Section
58A and 58AA of the Companies Act, 1956 or any other relevant
provisions of the Act and the rules framed there under.
7) The system of internal audit of the company needs to be strengthened
and commensurate to the size and nature of its business.
8) On the basis of the prima facie examination of the records of the
company, we are of the opinion that the company has made and maintained
cost records as required under section 209(1)(d) of the Companies Act,
1956. However we have not made a detailed examination of the records in
this regard.
9)
a) The Company is generally regular in depositing with appropriate
authorities undisputed statutory dues including Provident Fund, Sales
Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other
material statutory dues where ever applicable, though there are slight
delays in depositing provident fund and ESI. In respect of Income tax
there were delays in depositing the undisputed dues with appropriate
authorities.
b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
undisputed amounts payable in respect of Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth
Tax, Service Tax, Customs duty, Excise Duty and Cess were in arrears,
as at 31st March 2010 for a period of more than six months from the
dates they became payable except for the following:
Nature of Dues Amount Outstanding Period of Outstanding
Income Tax Rs. 3,77,87,852 A. Y 2008-09
Fringe Benefit Tax Rs. 72,854 A. Y 2008-09
Dividend
Distribution Tax Rs. 16,46,404 A. Y 2008-09
Tax Deducted at
Source Rs. 50,71,827 A. Y 2008-09
c) According to the information and explanations given to us, there are
no disputed dues in respect of Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax,
Service Tax, Customs duty, Excise Duty and Cess of the company that
have not been deposited except Income Tax payable Rs.12,76,668/-
pertaining to Assessment Year 2006-07, for which appeal is pending
before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).
10) The accumulated losses of the company as on 31st March 2010 does
not exceed 50 percent of its net worth. The Company has incurred Cash
Losses during the financial year covered by our audit and the
immediately preceding financial year.
11) During the year, the Companys Loans from Banks were subject to
Corporate Debt Restructuring, as a part of which, the bank allowed
"Holding on Operations". The dues of interest and principal during the
period have also been restructured.
12) The Company has not granted loans or advances on the basis of
security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and investments.
13) The Company has given guarantees for loans from banks taken by
subsidiary company/firms,who are engaged f or job works and the terms
and conditions of such guarantees in our opinion are not prejudicial to
the interest of the company.
14) In our opinion, the term loans have been applied for the purposes
for which they were raised.
15) According to the information and explanations given to us and on an
overall examination of the balance sheet of the company, we report that
the company has not applied short term funds for long term purposes.
16) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
company has not during the year, made preferential allotment of shares
to parties and companies covered in the register maintained under
section 301 of the Act.
17) According to the information and explanations given to us, during
the period covered by our audit report, the company has not issued any
debentures.
18) The end use of funds raised by public issues have been discussed as
Note No. C4 in the financial statements which have been verified by us.
19) According to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud
on or by the company has been noticed or reported during the course of
our audit.
For SURI & CO.,
(S. SUNDARARAMAN)
Membership no.28423
PARTNER
BANGALORE CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
25-06-2010 Firm Reg. No.004283s
Mar 31, 2009
We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of M/S INDUS FILA LIMITED as
at 31st March 2009 and also the Profit and Loss Account and Cash flow
statement for the period ended on that date annexed thereto. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements
based on our audit.
We conducted the audit in accordance with the auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 as amended
by Companies (Auditors report) (Amendment) order, 2004 issued by the
Central Government in terms of sub-section (4A) of Section 227 of the
Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the
matters specified in Paragraphs 4 and 5 of the order to the extent
applicable to this company.
Further to our comments in the annexure referred to above, we report
that:
i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of the
audit.
ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of
those books.
iii) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash flow statement
dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account
maintained by the Company.
iv) In our opinion the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash
flow statement dealt with by this report comply with the Accounting
Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of the
Companies Act, 1956.
v) Based on the declarations furnished by the directors taken on
record, none of the directors is disqualified to be appointed as
director under clause (g) of Sub-section (1) of Section 274 of the
Companies Act, 1956.
vi) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information
required by the Companies Act, 1956 in the manner so required subject
to note no 8 regarding the non classification of creditors into micro,
small and medium enterprises and the consequent non disclosure under
Schedule VI of the Companies Act, 1956 and MSMED Act 2006, give a true
and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally
accepted in India:
a. in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the State of affairs of the
company as at 31st March 2009; and
b. in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the LOSS for the
period ended on that date.
c. in the case of the Cash flow statement, of the cash flows for the
period ended on that date.
ANNEXURE TO AUDITORS REPORT
1. a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
b) The assets have been physically verified by the management during
the year, which in our opinion is reasonable having regard to the size
and nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on
such verification.
c) The Company has not disposed off any major part of the assets during
the year. 2.
a) The inventory has been physically verified by the management under
supervision by independent chartered accountants at the end of the
year.
b) The procedures of physical verification of stocks followed by the
management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the
company and nature of its business.
c) The company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The
discrepancies noticed on physical verification of stocks as compared to
the book records were not material and are being adjusted in the books
of account.
d) The valuation of stocks is fair and proper and is in accordance with
the generally accepted accounting principles.
3. a) The company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Act.
b) The company has taken interest-free unsecured loans, from companies,
firms or other parties aggregating to Rs.916.35 lakhs (5 parties)
covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Act.
c) Being interest free, the loans are prima facie not prejudicial to
the interest of the company.
d) The company is regular in the repayment of the principal amount as
per terms, wherever applicable.
4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the internal control procedures are commensurate with size
of the company and nature of its business with regard to purchase of
inventory, fixed assets and sale of goods and services subject to the
continuing weakness relating to the internal audit system as stated in
Para 7 below.
5. a) According to the information and explanations given to us, we
are of the opinion that the particulars of contracts or arrangements
referred to in section 301 of the Act have been entered in the register
required to be maintained under that section.
b) According to the information and explanations given to us, and
having regard to the explanations that some of the items purchased,
sold or services availed are of a special nature for which comparable
alternative price are not available, the transactions made in pursuance
of contracts or arrangements entered in the registers maintained under
section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 during the year have been made
at prices which are considered reasonable.
6. The Company has not accepted any deposits within the meaning of
Sections 58A and 58AA of the Companies Act, 1956 or any other relevant
provisions of the Act and the rules framed there under.
7. The system of internal audit of the company needs to be
strengthened commensurate to the size of the company.
8. On the basis of the prima facie examination of the records of the
company we are of the opinion that the company has made and maintained
cost records as required under section 209 (1)(d)of the Companies Act,
1956. However we have not made a detailed examination of the records in
this regard.
9. a) The company is generally regular in depositing with appropriate
authorities undisputed statutory dues including Provident fund, Sales
Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other
material statutory dues applicable. In respect of Income Tax there were
delays in depositing the undisputed dues with appropriate authorities.
b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
undisputed amounts payable in respect of Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth
Tax, Service Tax, Customs duty, Excise Duty and Cess were in arrears,
as at 31st March 2009 for a period of more than six months from the
dates they became payable except a sum of Rs.3,77,87,852 in respect of
Income Tax payable and Rs. 72,854 in respect of fringe benefit tax for
the assessment year 2008-09.
c) According to the information and explanations given to us, there are
no disputed dues in respect of Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax,
Service Tax, Customs duty, Excise Duty and Cess of the company that
have not been deposited.
10. The company does not have accumulated losses as on 31st March
2009. The Company has incurred Cash Losses during the financial year
covered by our audit. The company has not incurred cash loss in the
immediately preceding financial year.
11. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to a
financial institution or banks.
12. The Company has not granted loans or advances in the nature of
loans on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures
and investments.
13. The Company has given guarantees for loans from banks taken by
subsidiary company /firms who are engaged for job works and the terms
and conditions of such guarantees in our opinion are not prejudicial to
the interest of the Company.
14. In our opinion, the term loans have been applied for the purposes
for which they were raised.
15. According to the information and explanations given to us and on
an overall examination of the balance sheet of the company, we report
that the company has not applied short term sources for long term
purposes.
16. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
company has not during the year, made preferential allotment of shares
to parties and companies covered in the register maintained under
section 301 of the Act.
17. According to the information and explanations given to us, during
the period covered by our audit report, the company has not issued any
debentures.
18. The end use of funds raised by public issue have been disclosed as
Note No.C5 in the financial statements which have been verified by us.
19. According to the information and explanations given to us, no
fraud by or on the company has been noticed or reported during the
year.
For SURI & CO.,
(S.Sundararaman)
Place: Bangalore Partner
Date: 30.06.2009 Chartered Accountants
Membership No. 28423
Disclaimer: This is 3rd Party content/feed, viewers are requested to use their discretion and conduct proper diligence before investing, GoodReturns does not take any liability on the genuineness and correctness of the information in this article