Mar 31, 2015
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of SKYPAK SERVICE
SPECIALISTS LIMITED which comprise the Balance sheet as at 31st March,
2015, the Statement of Profit and Loss, Cash Flow Statement and a
summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory notes
for the year ended 31st March, 2015.
Management's Responsibility for the Financial Statements
The Company's Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated
in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 with respect to the
preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair
view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of
the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally
accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards specified under
Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts)
Rules, 2014. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate
accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for
safeguarding of the assets of the Company and for preventing and
detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of
appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that
are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance
of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating
effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the
accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the
financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditor's Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit. We have taken into account the
provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and
matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the
provisions of the Act and the Rules made there under.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing
specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require
that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about
the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. The
procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the
assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial
statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk
assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant
to the Company's preparation of the financial statements that give a
true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances but not for the purpose of expressing
an opinion on whether the company has in place an adequate internal
financial control system over financial reporting and the operating
effectiveness of such controls. An audit also includes evaluating the
appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness
of the accounting estimates made by the Company's Directors, as well as
evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and
appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the financial
statements.
Basis for Qualified Opinion
1. The company is showing a balance of Rs.4,84,54,459.00 under the head
Trade payable on acceptance for which no confirmation is available .
2. Further the company is showing a balance of Rs.2,88,35,422 under the
head trade receivable for which the account conformation is not
available.
3. As represented by the management, the company is in the process of
updation of the records showing full particulars including quantitative
details and situation of fixed assets. As on the date of signature of
this report, the register was not available for verification.
4. The Company has following statutory dues as on 31-03-2015.
SL NO HEAD OF ACCOUNT AMT (Rs.)
1 E.S.I.C. PAYABLE 36,97,906
2 P.F. DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 32,66,358
3 PROFESSION TAX PAYABLE 30,92,247
4 L W F PAYABLE 24,783
5 SERVICE TAX PAYABLE 4,17,29,345
Such PF default amounts have been paid in installments .
Qualified Opinion
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the
explanations given to us, except for the effects of the matter
described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph above, the
aforesaid financial statements give the information required by the Act
in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity
with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the
state of affairs of the Company as at 31st March, 2015, and its
profit/loss and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
As required by Section 143 (3) of the Act, we report that:
(a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations
which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the
purposes of our audit.
(b) Except for the effects of the matter described in the basis for
qualified Opinion paragraph above, In our opinion, proper books of
account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it
appears from our examination of those books.
(C ) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash
Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the
books of account.
(d ) Except for the effects of the matter described in the Basis for
qualified Opinion paragraph above, In our opinion, the aforesaid
financial statements comply with the Accounting Standards specified
under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies
(Accounts) Rules, 2014.
(e) The matter described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion Paragraph
above, in our opinion, may have an adverse effect on the functioning of
the company.
(f) On the basis of the written representations received from the
directors as on 31st March, 2015 taken on record by the Board of
Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March, 2015
from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164 (2) of the
Act.
(g) The qualification relating to the maintenance of accounts and other
matters connected therewith are as stated in the Basis for Qualified
Opinion paragraph above.
(h) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor's
Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors)
Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and
according to the explanations given to us:
i. The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its
financial position in its financial statements - Refer Note 17 to the
financial statements
ii. The Company did not have any long-term contracts including
derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable
losses
iii. There were no amounts which were required to be transferred to the
Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company11.
The Annexure referred to in our Independent Auditors' Report to the
members of the Company on the financial statements for the year ended
31 March 2015, we report that:
(i) (a) The Company has not maintained proper records showing full
particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets at head office and for its branches.
(b) The Company has a no regular programme of physical verification of
its fixed assets by which fixed assets are verified in a phased manner
over a period of three years. In our opinion, this periodicity of
physical verification is not reasonable having regard to the size of
the Company and the nature of its assets.
(ii) The Company is a service company, primarily rendering courier
services. Accordingly, it does not hold any physical inventories. Thus,
paragraph 3(ii) of the Order is not applicable.
(iii) (a) The Company has not granted loans anybody corporate covered
in the register maintained under section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013
('the Act').
(b) In the case of the loans granted to the bodies corporate listed in
the register maintained under section 189 of the Act, the borrowers
have been regular in the payment of the interest as stipulated. The
terms of arrangements do not stipulate any repayment schedule and the
loans are repayable on demand. Accordingly, paragraph 3(iii)(b) of the
Order is not applicable to the Company in respect of repayment of the
principal amount.
(C) There are no overdue amounts of more than rupees one lakh in
respect of the loans granted to the bodies corporate listed in the
register maintained under section 189 of the Act.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there is an adequate Internal control system commensurate
with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard
to purchase of fixed assets and sale of services. The activities of the
Company do not involve purchase of inventory and the sale of goods. We
have not observed any major weakness in the internal control system
during the course of the audit.
(v) The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public.
(vi) The Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost
records under section 148(1) of the Act, for any of the services
rendered by the Company.
(vii) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us and
on the basis of our examination of the records of the Company, amounts
deducted/ accrued in the books of account in respect of undisputed
statutory dues including provident fund, income tax, sales tax, wealth
tax, service tax, duty of customs, value added tax, cess and other
material statutory dues have been regularly deposited during the year
by the Company with the appropriate authorities. As explained to us,
the Company did not have any dues on account of employees' state
insurance and duty of excise. According to the information and
explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of
provident fund, income tax, sales tax, wealth tax, service tax, duty of
customs, value added tax, cess and other material statutory dues were
in arrears as at 31 March 2015 for a period of more than six months
from the date they became payable except for the dues of provident fund
which are in arrears and being deposited in installments.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, there
are no material dues of wealth tax, duty of customs and cess which have
not been deposited with the appropriate authorities on account of any
dispute. However, according to information and explanations given to us
the following statutory dues are pending as follows:
SL NO HEAD OF ACCOUNT AMT (Rs.)
1 E.S.I.C. PAYABLE 36,97,906
2 P.F. DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 32,66,358
3 PROFESSION TAX PAYABLE 30,92,247
4 L W F PAYABLE 24,783
5 SERVICE TAX PAYABLE 4,17,29,345
Such PF default amounts have been paid in installments
(c) According to the information and explanations given to us the
amounts which were required to be transferred to the investor education
and protection fund in accordance with the relevant provisions of the
Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) and rules there under has been
transferred to such fund within time.
(viii) The accumulated losses of the company as on 31st March, 2015 are
more than fifty percent of its Net Worth. The company has incurred cash
losses during the financial year.
(ix) The Company did not have any outstanding dues to financial
institutions, banks or debenture holders during the year.
(x) In our opinion and according to the information and the
explanations given to us, the Company has not given any guarantee for
loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions.
(xi) The Company have outstanding corporate deposit of Rs 1,44,00,000
from Banhem Financial Securities Pvt. Ltd. as on 31-03-2015 .
(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
material fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during
the course of our audit.
For PAMS & ASSOCIATES
Chartered Accountants
Firm Reg. No.: 316079E
Sd/-
Satyajit Mishra
Partner
M. No. 057293
Date: 30th May, 2015
Mar 31, 2014
1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of SKYPAK SERVICE
SPECIALISTS LTD. as at 31st March, 2014 and also the Profit & Loss
Account of the Company for the year ended on that date annexed
thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company''s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with Auditing Standards
generally accepted in India. These standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatements. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by the management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
3. As required by the companies(AuditorÂs report)(Amendment) order
2004 issued by the central government of India in terms of sub
sections (4A) of section 227 of the companies Act, information and
explanation given to us, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the
matters specified in paragraph 4 and 5 of the said order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we
report that:
a) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit.
b) In our opinion, proper books of accounts, as required by law, have
been kept by the Company, so far as appears from our examinations of
those books.
c) The Balance Sheet and the Statement of Profit & Loss Account dealt
with by this report are in agreement with the books of account.
d) In our opinion the Balance sheet and Profit & Loss Account are in
compliance with the Accounting Standards referred to in Section
211(3C) of the Companies Act, 1956.
e) On the Basis of written representation received from the director
as on March 31,2014 and taken on record by the board of directors we
report that none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31,2014
from being appointed as director in terms of clause(g) of Sub section
(1) of section 274 of the companies Act 1956 and
5. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts read together with the
notes thereon give the information required by the Companies Act,
1956, in the manner so required, and present a true and fair view.
i) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31st March, 2014 and
ii) in the case of statement of Profit & Loss Account, of the Loss for
the year ended on that date.
For J.H. Ghumara & Co Chartered Accountants Firm Reg No:-103185w
Place: Mumbai Date: 14th August 2014 Jagdishchandra H Ghumara
Proprietor Membership No:-14320 ANNEXURE TO THE AUDITORS REPORT
(Referred to in Paragraph 3 of our report of even date)
1. The fixed assets register as required to be maintained by the
company had been maintained by the company.
The Management during the year has physically verified the fixed
assets of the company. No discrepancy has been found.
2. The company being a service company, clause (ii) (a), ii (b) and
(ii) (c) of paragraph 4 the aforesaid order, regarding inventories are
not applicable.
3. It is represented to us by the management that registers under
section 301 of the companies Act 1956 has been duly maintained.
Details of Loans taken:
No Party Relationship Year End
Balance
(Rs)
1. Devika D kulkarni Director 76,90,622
2. Dilip M kulkarni Director 49,64,087
We are given to understand that the above loan is interest free, which
is not prejudicial to the interest of the company.
We are given to understand by the companyÂs management that these
loans are Repayable on demand, which in our opinion is prima facie
prejudicial to the interest of the company.
According to the information and explanation given to us, the above
mentioned loans are repayable on demand. Accordingly the question of
regularities in repayment of principal amount does not arise.
4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us, the company has internal control procedures generally
commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of its
business with regards to purchase of fixed assets.
5. The register Maintained under section 301 of the companies act has
been produced before us for verification during the course of Audit.
Transactions that need to be entered in the register have been so
entered.
In our opinion transaction entered in the register maintained u/s301
of the companies act 1956 have been made in pursuance of contracts or
arrangements and exceeding the value of five lakhs rupees in respect
of any party during the year, have been made at the price, which are
reasonable having regards to prevailing market price of the relevant
time.
6. Acceptance of Deposit by the company against bills of exchange does
not comply with the provision of clause (a) and clause (b) of sub
section 2 of section 58A of the companies Act 1956.
Further during the course of our Audit we have neither come across nor
have we been informed of any order passed under section 58A and
section 58AA or by the national company law tribunal or company Law
board or the Reserve Bank of India or any other court or any other
tribunal during the year.
7. The company has internal control system during the year
commensurate with size of transactions.
8. In our opinion, clause (viii) of paragraph 4 of the aforesaid order
is not applicable to the company, since the central Government has not
prescribed maintenance of cost records under section209(1)(d) of the
companies Act 1956 for the company.
9. According to the books and records as produced before us and
examined by us are in accordance with generally accepted auditing
practices in India, we are in opinion that Company is not regular in
depositing with statutory authorities; undisputed dues in respect of
Provident fund, Employees State insurance, profession Tax, and service
Tax.
The details in respect of unpaid statutory dues, which have remained
outstanding as on
31.03.2014 for a period exceeding six month from the date they become
payable are as under.
According to the records of the company there are no dues of sales
tax, income tax, custom Duty, wealth Tax, service tax,/Cess which have
not been Deposited on Account of any dispute.
10. The accumulated losses of the company as on March 31, 2014 are
more than fifty percent of its Net worth. The Company has incurred
cash losses during the current year.
11. The Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to Bank. The
Company has not issued debentures and hence the question of repayment
does not arise.
12. The Company has not granted any loans and advances on the Basis of
securities by way of pledge of shares, debentures or other similar
securities.
13. We are given to understand that the provisions of any special
statute applicable to chit fund, Nidhi or Mutual Benefits Fund/society
are not applicable to the company.
14. Since the company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities
debentures and other investment the question of Maintenance of Proper
records does not arise. However the company does have investment held
in his own name.
15. The company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others
from banks or financial institutions during the year.
16. According to the information and explanation given to us, the
company has not availed any term loans during the year.
17. On the Basis of review of utilization of fund on overall Basis,
the related information made available to us and as represented to us
by the management, we are of the opinion that funds raised on long
term basis have been used for Long term application and fund raised
for short term basis have been used for short term application.
18. The Company has not raised any money by issue of shares during the
year. In our opinion and according to information and explanation
given to us, the company has not made any preferential allotment of
shares to parties and companies covered in the register maintained
under section 301 of the companies Act 1956 during the year.
19. Since the company has not issued any debentures during the year,
the question of creation of any security does not arise.
20. The Company has not raised any money by public issue during the
year.
21. No Misappropriation during the year has been reported by the
Management.
FOR J.H.GHUMARA & CO
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
FIRM REG NO:-103185W
JAGDISHCHANDRA H GHUMARA
Place: Mumbai
Date: 14th August 2014 PROPRIETOR
Membership No:-14320
Mar 31, 2012
1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of SKYPAK SERVICE
SPECIALISTS LTD. as at 31st March, 2012 and also the Profit & Loss
Account of the Company for the year ended on that date annexed thereto.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company''s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with Auditing Standards
generally accepted in India. These standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatements. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by the management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
3. As required by the companies(Auditor''s report)(Amendment) order
2004 issued by the central government of india in terms of sub sections
(4A) of section 227 of the companies Act, information and explanation
given to us, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters
specified in paragraph 4 and 5 of the said order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we
report that:
a) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit . b) In our opinion, proper books of accounts, as required by
law, have been kept by the Company, so far as appears from our
examinations of those books.
c) The Balance Sheet and the Statement of Profit & Loss Account dealt
with by this report are in agreement with the books of account.
d) In our opinion the Balance sheet and Profit & Loss Account are in
compliance with the Accounting Standards referred to in Section 211(3C)
of the Companies Act, 1956.
e) On the Basis of written representation received from the director as
on March 31,2012 and taken on record by the board of directors we
report that none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31,2012
from being appointed as director in terms of clause(g) of Sub section
(1) of section 274 of the companies Act 1956 and
5. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts read together with the
notes thereon give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956,
in the manner so required, and present a true and fair view.
i) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31st March, 2012 and
ii) in the case of statement of Profit & Loss Account, of the Loss for
the year ended on that date.
ANNEXURE TO THE AUDITORS REPORT (Referred to in Paragraph 3 of our
report of even date)
1. The fixed assets register as required to be maintained by the
company had been stated to us to be maintained by the company. However,
the same was not produced before us for our verification. :
The Management during the year has not physically verified the fixed
assets of the company. Fixed assets disposed off during the year were
not substantial, and therefore, do not affect the going concern
assumption. :
2. The company being a service company, clause (ii) (a), ii (b) and
(ii) (c) of paragraph 4 the aforesaid order, | regarding inventories
are not applicable. :
3. It is represented to us by the management that register under
section 301 of the companies Act 1956 has been duly maintained, but the
same could not be furnished for our perusal during the course of audit.
;
The company has granted unsecured shortterm loan to a group Company at
15% interest, which is repayable on demand. Details are as under;
Party Relationship Balance
at the During
the Year Amount Year End
beginning
of the (interest)
(Rs) Received Balance
Year
(Rs) during the (Rs) :
Year
(Rs]
Skypak
financial Group Company 11,62,765 NIL 11,62,765 NIL
Securities
P Ltd
In view of the fact that the loan is interest bearing and repayable on
demand, we are of the opinion that the term ; & conditions thereof with
regards to interest & repayment are not prima facie prejudicial to the
interest of the company.
In view of the fact that the loan is repayable on demand the question
of overdue does not arise.
Details of Loans taken: :
No Party Relationship Year End Balance
1 Devika D
kulkarni Director 16,98,600
2 Dilip M kulkarni Director 51,27,386
We are given to understand that the above loan is interest free, which
is not prejudicial to the interest of the company We are given to
understand by the company''s management that these loans are Repayable
on demand, which in our opinion is prima facie prejudicial to the
interest of the company.According to the information and explanation
given to us, the :
above mention loans are repayable on demand. Accordingly the question
of regularities in repayment of principal amount does not arise.
4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us, the company did not implement internal control procedures
generally commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of
its business with regards ; to purchase of fixed assets.
:
However, internal control has to be implemented and strengthened in the
area of Accounts, sales and collection.
-
Further, during the course of our audit, we found that certain books of
account were short in nature and not produced before us for the
verification. This in our opinion it is indication of major weakness in
internal control procedures, :
which require immediate corrective action from the management
-
5. The register Maintained under section 301 of the companies act was
not produced before us for verification during : the course of Audit.
However we were informed by the management that transactions that need
to be entered in the : register have been so entered.
-
In our opinion transaction entered in the register maintained u/s301of
the companies act 1956 have been made in pursuance of contracts or
arrangements and exceeding the value of five lakhs rupees in respect of
any party during : the year, have been made at the price, which are
reasonable having regards to prevailing market price of the : relevant
time.
6. Acceptance of Deposit by the company against bills of exchange does
not comply with the provision of clause (a) and clause (b) of sub
section 2 of section 58A of the companies Act 1956.
Further during the course of our Audit we have neither come across nor
have we been informed of any order passed under section 58A and section
58AA or by the national company law tribunal or company Law board or
the Reserve Bank of India or any other court or any other tribunal
during the year.
7. The company did not implement the internal control system during
the year.
8. In our opinion, clause (viii) of paragraph 4 of the aforesaid order
is not applicable to the company, since the central Government has not
prescribed maintenance of cost records under section209(1)(d) of the
companies Act 1956 for the company.
9. According to the books and records as produced before us and
examined by us in accordance with generally accepted auditing practices
in India, we are in opinion that Company is not regular in depositing
with statutory authorities; undisputed dues in respect of Provident
fund, Employees State insurance, profession Tax, and service Tax.
The details in respect of unpaid statutory dues, which have remained
outstanding as on 31.03.2012 for a period exceeding six month from the
date they become payable are as under.
STATUTORY DUES Amount outstanding
(Rs)
ESIC 56,76,417
(including
Company''s
contribution)
Provident Fund 1,93,74,638
(including
Company''s
Contribution)
Profession Tax 30,92,247
Fringe Benefit Tax 7,92,998
Service Tax 5,87,68,236
According to the records of the company there are no dues of sales tax,
income tax, custom Duty, wealth Tax, service tax,/Cess Which have not
been Deposited on Account of any dispute.
10. The accumulated losses of the company as on March 31, 2012 are
more than fifty percent of its Net worth. The Company has incurred cash
losses during the current year.
11. The Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to Bank. The
Company has not issued debentures and hence the question of repayment
does not arise.
12. The Company has not granted any loans and advances on the Basis of
securities by way of pledge of shares, debentures or other similar
securities.
13. We are given to understand that the provisions of any special
statute applicable to chit fund, Nidhi or Mutual Benefits Fund/society
are not applicable to the company.
14. Since the company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities
debentures and other investment the question of Maintenance of Proper
records does not arise. However the company does have investment held
in his own name.
15. The company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others
from banks or financial institutions during the year.
16. According to the information and explanation given to us, the
company has not availed any term loans during the year.
17. On the Basis of review of utilization of fund on overall Basis,
the related information made available to us and as represented to us
by the management, we are of the opinion that funds raised on long term
basis have been used for Long term application and fund raised for
short term basis have been used for short term application.
18. The Company has not raised any money by issue of shares during the
year. In our opinion and according to information and explanation given
to us, the company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to
parties and companies covered in the register maintained under section
301 of the companies Act 1956 during the year.
19. Since the company has not issued any debentures during the year,
the question of creation of any security does not arise.
20. The Company has not raised any money by public issue during the
year.
21. No Misappropriation during the year have been reported by the
Management.
FOR J.H.GHUMARA & CO
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
FIRM REG NO:-103185W
SD/-
JAGDISHCHANDRA H GHUMARA
Place: Mumbai PROPRIETOR
Date: 27th August 2012 Membership No:-14320
Mar 31, 2011
1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of SKYPAK SERVICE
SPECIALISTS LTD. as at 31st March, 2011 and also the Profit & Loss
Account of the Company for the year ended on that date annexed thereto.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with Auditing Standards
generally accepted in India. These standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatements. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by the management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
3. As required by the companies(Auditor's report)(Amendment) order
2004 issued by the central government of India in terms of sub sections
(4A) of section 227 of the companies Act, information and explanation
given to us, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters
specified in paragraph 4 and 5 of the said order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we
report that:
a) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit except to the extent indicated in note no 3 of notes forming part
of Accounts;
b) In our opinion, proper books of accounts, as required by law, have
been kept by the Company, so far as appears from our examinations of
those books.
c) The Balance Sheet and the Profit & Loss Account dealt with by this
report are in agreement with the books of account.
d) In our opinion the Balance sheet and Profit & Loss Account are in
compliance with the Accounting Standards referred to in Section 211(3C)
of the Companies Act, 1956.
e) On the Basis of written representation received from the director as
on March 31,2011 and taken on record by the board of directors we
report that none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31,2011
from being appointed as director in terms of clause(g) of Sub section
(1) of section 274 of the companies Act 1956 and
5. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts read together with the
notes thereon give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956,
in the manner so required, and present a true and fair view.
i) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31st March, 2011 and
ii) in the case of Profit & Loss Account, of the profit for the year
ended on that date.
ANNEXURE TO THE AUDITORS REPORT (Referred to in Paragraph 3 of our
report of even date)
1. The fixed assets register as required to be maintained by the
company had been stated to us to be maintained by the company. However,
the same was not produced before us for our verification.
The Management during the year has not physically verified the fixed
assets of the company. Fixed assets disposed off during the year were
not substantial, and therefore, do not affect the going concern
assumption.
2. The company being a service company, clause (ii) (a), ii (b) and
(ii) (c) of paragraph 4 the aforesaid order, regarding inventories are
not applicable.
3. It is represented to us by the management that register under
section 301 of the companies Act 1956 has been duly maintained, but the
same could not be furnished for our perusal during the course of audit.
The company has granted unsecured short term loan to a group Company at
15% interest, which is repayable on demand. Details are as under;
Party Relationship Balance at
the During the Amount Year End
beginning
of Year
(interest) Received Balance
the Year
(Rs) (Rs) during
the (Rs)
Year
(Rs)
Skypak Group
Company 11,62,765 NIL 11,62,765 NIL
financial
Securi
-ties
P Ltd
In view of the fact that the loan is interest bearing and repayable on
demand, we are of the opinion that the term & conditions thereof with
regards to interest & repayment are not prima facie prejudicial to the
interest of the company.
In view of the fact that the loan is repayable on demand the question
of overdue does not arise.
Details of Loans taken:
No Party Relationship Year End Balance
(Rs)
1 Devika D kulkarni Director 16,98,600
2 Dilip M kulkarni Director 51,27,386
We are given to understand that the above loan is interest free, which
is not prejudicial to the interest of the company.
We are given to understand by the company's management that these loans
are Repayable on demand, which in our opinion is prima facie
prejudicial to the interest of the company.
According to the information and explanation given to us, the above
mention loans are repayable on demand. Accordingly the question of
regularities in repayment of principal amount does not arise.
4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us, the company did not implement internal control procedures
generally commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of
its business with regards to purchase of fixed assets.
However, internal control has to be implemented and strengthened in the
area of Accounts, sales and collection.
Further, during the course of our audit, we found that certain books of
account were short in nature and not produced before us for the
verification. This in our opinion it is indication of major weakness in
internal control procedures, which require immediate corrective action
from the management
5. The register Maintained under section 301 of the companies act was
not produced before us for verification during the course of Audit.
However we were informed by the management that transactions that need
to be entered in the register have been so entered.
In our opinion transaction entered in the register maintained u/s301of
the companies act 1956 have been made in pursuance of contracts or
arrangements and exceeding the value of five lakhs rupees in respect of
any party during the year, have been made at the price, which are
reasonable having regards to prevailing market price of the relevant
time.
6. Acceptance of Deposit by the company against bills of exchange does
not comply with the provision of clause (a) and clause (b) of sub
section 2 of section 58A of the companies Act 1956.
Further during the course of our Audit we have neither come across nor
have we been informed of any order passed under section 58A and section
58AA or by the national company law tribunal or company Law board or
the Reserve Bank of India or any other court or any other tribunal
during the year.
7. The company did not implement the internal control system during
the year.
8. In our opinion, clause (viii) of paragraph 4 of the aforesaid order
is not applicable to the company, since the central Government has not
prescribed maintenance of cost records under section209(1)(d) of the
companies Act 1956 for the company.
9. According to the books and records as produced before us and
examined by us in accordance with generally accepted auditing practices
in India, we are in opinion that Company is not regular in depositing
with statutory authorities; undisputed dues in respect of Provident fund,
Employees State insurance, profession Tax, and service Tax. The details
in respect of unpaid statutory dues, which have remained outstanding as
on 31.03.2011 for a period exceeding six month from the date they become
payable are as under.
STATUTORY DUES Amount outstanding
Rs)
ESIC 54,35,873
(including Company's contribution)
Provident Fund 2,21,96,809
(including Company's Contribution)/
Profession Tax 30,36,197
Fringe Benefit Tax 7,92,998
Service Tax 5,62,88,925
According to the records of the company there are no dues of sales tax,
income tax, custom Duty, wealth Tax, service tax,/Cess Which have not
been Deposited on Account of any dispute.
10. The accumulated losses of the company as on March 31, 2011 are
more than fifty percent of its Net worth. The Company has incurred
cash losses during the current year.
11. The Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to Bank. The
Company has not issued debentures and hence the question of repayment
does not arise.
12. The Company has not granted any loans and advances on the Basis of
securities by way of pledge of shares, debentures or other similar
securities.
13. We are given to understand that the provisions of any special
statute applicable to chit fund, Nidhi or Mutual Benefits Fund/society
are not applicable to the company.
14. Since the company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities
debentures and other investment the question of Maintenance of Proper
records does not arise. However the company does have investment held
in his own name.
15. The company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others
from banks or financial institutions during the year.
16. According to the information and explanation given to us, the
company has not availed any term loans during the year.
17. On the Basis of review of utilization of fund on overall Basis,
the related information made available to us and as represented to us
by the management, we are of the opinion that funds raised on long term
basis have been used for Long term application and fund raised for
short term basis have been used for short term application.
18. The Company has not raised any money by issue of shares during the
year. In our opinion and according to information and explanation given
to us, the company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to
parties and companies covered in the register maintained under section
301 of the companies Act 1956 during the year.
19. Since the company has not issued any debentures during the year,
the question of creation of any security does not arise.
20. The Company has not raised any money by public issue during the
year.
21. No Misappropriation during the year have been reported by the
Management.
FOR J.H. GHUMARA & CO
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
FIRM REG NO:-103185W
JAGDISHCHANDRA H GHUMARA
Place: Mumbai PROPRIETOR
Date: August 10, 2011. Membership No:-14320
Mar 31, 2010
We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of SKYPAK SERVICE
SPECIALISTS LTD. as at 31st March, 2010 and also the Profit & Loss
Account of the Company for the year ended on that date annexed thereto.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with Auditing Standards generally
accepted in India. These standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatements. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in financial statements. An audit also includes assessing
the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
As required by the companies(Auditors report)(Amendment) order 2004
issued by the central government of India in terms of sub sections (4A)
of section 227 of the companies Act, information and explanation given
to us, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified
in paragraph 4 and 5 of the said order.
Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report
that:
We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit except to the extent indicated in note no 3 of notes forming part
of Accounts;
In our opinion, proper books of accounts, as required by law, have been
kept by the Company, so far as appears from our examinations of those
books.
The Balance Sheet and the Profit & Loss Account dealt with by this
report are in agreement with the books of account.
In our opinion the Balance sheet and Profit & Loss Account are in
compliance with the Accounting Standards referred to in Section 211(3C)
of the Companies Act, 1956.
On the Basis of written representation received from the director as on
March 31,2010 and taken on record by the board of directors we report
that none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31,2010 from
being appointed as director in terms of clause(g) of Sub section (1) of
section 274 of the companies Act 1956 and In our opinion and to the
best of our information and according to the explanations given to us,
the said accounts read together with the notes thereon give the
information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so
required, and present a true and fair view.
i) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31st March, 2010 and
ii) in the case of Profit & Loss Account, for the year ended as on that
date.
The fixed assets register as required to be maintained by the company
had been stated to us to be maintained by the company. However, the
same was not produced before us for our verification.
The Management during the year has not physically verified the fixed
assets of the company. Fixed assets disposed off during the year were
not substantial, and therefore, do not affect the going concern
assumption.
The company being a service company, clause (ii) (a), ii (b) and (ii)
(c) of paragraph 4 the aforesaid order, regarding inventories are not
applicable.
It is represented to us by the management that register under section
301 of the companies Act 1956 has been duly maintained, but the same
could not be furnished for our perusal during the course of audit.
The company has granted unsecured short term loan to a group Company at
15% interest, which is repayable on demand. Details are as under;
Party Relationship Balance
at the During the Amount Year End
beginning
of Year
(interest) Received Balance
the Year
(Rs) (Rs) during
the (Rs)
Year(Rs)
Skypak Group Company 11,62,765 NIL NIL 11,62,765
financial
Securities
P Ltd
In view of the fact that the loan is interest bearing and repayable on
demand, we are of the opinion that the term & conditions thereof with
regards to interest & repayment are not prima facie prejudicial to the
interest of the company.
In view of the fact that the loan is repayable on demand the question
of overdue does not arise.
Details of Loans taken:
No Party Relationship Year End Balance
(Rs)
1 Devika D kulkarni Director 17,31,845
2 Dilip M kulkarni Director 62,73,937
We are given to understand that the above loan is interest free, which
is not prejudicial to the interest of the company.
We are given to understand by the company's management that these
loans are Repayable on demand, which in our opinion is prima facie
prejudicial to the interest of the company.
According to the information and explanation given to us, the above
mention loans are repayable on demand. Accordingly the question of
regularities in repayment of principal amount does not arise.
In our opinion and according to the information and explanation given
to us, there are adequate internal control procedures generally
commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of its
business with regards to purchase of fixed assets.
However, internal control has to be improved and strengthened in the
area of Accounts, sales and collection.
Further, during the course of our audit, we found that certain books of
account were short in nature and not furnished before us for the
verification. This in our opinion it is indication of major weakness in
internal control procedures, which require immediate corrective action
from the management.
The register Maintained under section 301 of the companies act was not
produced before us for verification during the course of Audit. However
we were informed by the management that transactions that need to be
entered in the register have been so entered.
In our opinion transaction entered in the register maintained u/s301of
the companies act 1956 have been made in pursuance of contracts or
arrangements and exceeding the value of five lakhs rupees in respect of
any party during the year, have been made at the price, which are
reasonable having regards to prevailing market price of the relevant
time.
Acceptance of Deposit by the company against bills of exchange does not
comply with the provision of clause (a) and clause (b) of sub section 2
of section 58A of the companies Act 1956.
Further during the course of our Audit we have neither come across nor
have we been informed of any order passed under section 58A and section
58AA or by the national company law tribunal or company Law board or
the Reserve Bank of India or any other court or any other tribunal
during the year.
The company did not implement the internal control system during the
year.
In our opinion, clause (viii) of paragraph 4 of the aforesaid order is
not applicable to the company, since the central Government has not
prescribed maintenance of cost records under section209(1 )(d) of the
companies Act 1956 for the company.
According to the books and records as produced before us and examined
by us in accordance with generally accepted auditing practices in
India, we are in opinion that
Company is not regular in depositing with statutory authorities,
undisputed dues in respect of Provident fund, Employees State
insurance, profession Tax, and service Tax.
The details in respect of unpaid statutory dues, which have remained
outstanding as on 31.03.2010 for a period exceeding six month from the
date they become payable are as under.
STATUTORY DUES Amount outstanding
(Rs)
ESIC 46,47,419
(including Company's contribution)
Provident Fund 2,78,37,892
(including Company's Contribution)
Profession Tax 29,11,838
Fringe Benefit Tax 7,92,998
Service Tax 5,29,69,752
According to the records of the company there are no dues of sales tax,
income tax, custom Duty, wealth Tax, service tax,/Cess Which have not
been Deposited on Account of any dispute.
The accumulated losses of the company as on March 31, 2010 are more
than fifty percent of its Net worth. The Company has incurred cash
losses during the current year.
The Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to Bank. The Company
has not issued debentures and hence the question of repayment does not
arise.
The Company has not granted any loans and advances on the Basis of
securities by way of pledge of shares, debentures or other similar
securities.
We are given to understand that the provisions of any special statute
applicable to chit fund, Nidhi or Mutual Benefits Fund/society are not
applicable to the company.
Since the company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities
debentures and other investment the question of Maintenance of Proper
records does not arise. However the company does have investment held
in his own name.
The company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from
banks or financial institutions during the year.
According to the information and explanation given to us, the company
has not availed any term loans during the year.
On the Basis of review of utilization of fund on overall Basis, the
related information made available to us and as represented to us by
the management, we are of the opinion that funds raised on long term
basis have been used for Long term application and fund raised for
short term basis have been used for short term application.
The Company has not raised any money by issue of shares during the
year. In our opinion and according to information and explanation given
to us, the company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to
parties and companies covered in the register maintained under section
301 of the companies Act 1956 during the year. Since the company has
not issued any debentures during the year, the question of creation of
any security does not arise.
The Company has not raised any money by public issue during the year.
No Misappropriation during the year have been reported by the
Management.
FOR J.H.GHUMARA & CO
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
FIRM REG NO:-103185W
JAGDISHCHANDRA H GHUMARA
Place: Mumbai PROPRIETOR
Date: August 02, 2010. Membership No:-14320
Disclaimer: This is 3rd Party content/feed, viewers are requested to use their discretion and conduct proper diligence before investing, GoodReturns does not take any liability on the genuineness and correctness of the information in this article