Auditor Report of Sterling Tools Ltd.

Mar 31, 2018

Report on the Standalone Financial Statements

1. We have audited the accompanying standalone financial statements of Sterling Tools Limited (‘the Company’), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 31 March 2018, the Statement of Profit and Loss (including Other Comprehensive Income), the Cash Flow Statement and the Statement of Changes in Equity for the year then ended and a summary of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management’s Responsibility for the Standalone Financial Statements

2. The Company’s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 (‘the Act’) with respect to the preparation of these standalone financial statements that give a true and fair view of the state of affairs (financial position), profit or loss (financial performance including other comprehensive income), cash flows and changes in equity of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Indian Accounting Standards (‘Ind AS’) specified under Section 133 of the Act. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the standalone financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor’s Responsibility

3. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these standalone financial statements based on our audit.

4. We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made thereunder.

5. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether these standalone financial statements are free from material misstatement.

6. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial controls relevant to the Company’s preparation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Company’s Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

7. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on these standalone financial statements.

Opinion

8. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid standalone financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India including Ind AS specified under Section 133 of the Act, of the state of affairs (financial position) of the Company as at 31 March 2018 and its profit (financial performance including other comprehensive income), its cash flows and the changes in equity for the year ended on that date.

Other Matter

9. The comparative financial information for the year ended 31 March 2017 and the transition date opening balance sheet as at 1 April 2016 prepared in accordance with Ind AS included in these standalone financial statements, are based on the previously issued statutory financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2017 and 31 March 2016 respectively prepared in accordance with Accounting Standards prescribed under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014 (as amended) which were audited by the predecessor auditor whose reports dated 26 May 2017 and 20 May 2016 respectively expressed unmodified opinion on those standalone financial statements and have been adjusted for the differences in the accounting principles adopted by the Company on transition to Ind AS, which have been audited by us. Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

10. As required by the Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order, 2016 (‘the Order’) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of Section 143(11) of the Act, we give in the Annexure I, a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.

11. Further to our comments in Annexure I, as required by Section 143(3) of the Act, we report that:

a) we have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;

b) in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books;

c) the standalone financial statements dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

d) in our opinion, the aforesaid standalone financial statements comply with Ind AS specified under Section 133 of the Act;

e) on the basis of the written representations received from the directors and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors are disqualified as on 31 March 2018 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164(2) of the Act;

f) we have also audited the internal financial controls over financial reporting (IFCoFR) of the Company as on 31 March 2018 in conjunction with our audit of the standalone financial statements of the Company for the year ended on that date and our report dated 23 May 2018 as per Annexure II expressed an unmodified opinion; and

g) with respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor’s Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014 (as amended), in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i. the Company, as detailed in Note 40 to the standalone financial statements, has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position;

ii. the Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses;

iii. there has been no delay in transferring amounts, required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company; and

iv. The disclosure requirements relating to holdings as well as dealings in specified bank notes were applicable for the period from 8 November 2016 to 30 December 2016 which are not relevant to these standalone financial statements. Hence, reporting under this clause is not applicable.

Annexure I to the Independent Auditor’s Report of even date to the members of Sterling Tools Limited on the standalone financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2018

Annexure I

Based on the audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting a true and fair view on the financial statements of the Company and taking into consideration the information and explanations given to us and the books of account and other records examined by us in the normal course of audit, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, we report that:

(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of property, plant and equipment.

(b) The Company has a regular program of physical verification of its property, plant and equipment under which property, plant and equipment are verified in a phased manner over a period of two years, which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. In accordance with this program, certain property, plant and equipment were verified during the year and no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

(c) The title deeds of all the immovable properties (which are included under the head ‘Property, plant and equipment’) are held in the name of the Company.

(ii) In our opinion, the management has conducted physical verification of inventory at reasonable intervals during the year, except for goods-in-transit and stocks lying with third parties. For stocks lying with third parties at the year-end, written confirmations have been obtained by the management. No material discrepancies were noticed on the aforesaid verification.

(iii) The Company has not granted any loan, secured or unsecured to companies, firms, Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs) or other parties covered in the register maintained under Section 189 of the Act. Accordingly, the provisions of clauses 3(iii)(a), 3(iii)(b) and 3(iii)(c) of the Order are not applicable.

(iv) In our opinion, the Company has complied with the provisions of Section 186 in respect of investments. Further, in our opinion, the Company has not entered into any transaction covered under Section 185 and Section 186 of the Act in respect of loans, guarantees and security.

(v) In our opinion, the Company has not accepted any deposits within the meaning of Sections 73 to 76 of the Act and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014 (as amended). Accordingly, the provisions of clause 3(v) of the Order are not applicable.

(vi) We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the Company pursuant to the Rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under sub-section (1) of Section 148 of the Act in respect of Company’s products and are of the opinion that, prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. However, we have not made a detailed examination of the cost records with a view to determine whether they are accurate or complete.

(vii) (a) The Company is regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, employees’ state insurance, income-tax, sales tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value added tax, cess and other material statutory dues, as applicable, to the appropriate authorities. Further, no undisputed amounts payable in respect thereof were outstanding at the year-end for a period of more than six months from the date they become payable.

(b) The dues outstanding in respect of income-tax, sales tax, service-tax, duty of customs, duty of excise and value added tax on account of any dispute, are as follows:

Statement of Disputed Dues

Name of the statute	Nature of dues	Amount (Rs. in lacs)	Amount paid under protest (Rs. in lacs)	Period to which the amount relates	forum where dispute is pending
Central Excise Act, 1944	Excise duty and penalty	39.90	Nil	February 2010 to March 2010	Customs, Excise and Service tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi
Central Excise Act, 1944	Excise duty and penalty	53.27	Nil	November 2010 to January 2011	Customs, Excise and Service tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi
Income-tax Act, 1961	Demand under the Income-tax Act, 1961	0.62	Nil	Assessment year 2013-14	Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)

(viii) The Company has not defaulted in repayment of loans or borrowings to any bank during the year. The Company did not have any outstanding loans payable to any financial institution or government during the year. Further, the Company does not have any outstanding debentures during the year.

(ix) The Company did not raise moneys by way of initial public offer or further public offer (including debt instruments). In our opinion, the term loans were applied for the purposes for which the loans were obtained.

(x) No fraud by the Company or on the Company by its officers or employees has been noticed or reported during the period covered by our audit.

(xi) Managerial remuneration has been paid and provided by the Company in accordance with the requisite approvals mandated by the provisions of Section 197 of the Act read with Schedule V to the Act.

(xii) In our opinion, the Company is not a Nidhi Company. Accordingly, provisions of clause 3(xii) of the Order are not applicable.

(xiii) In our opinion, all transactions with the related parties are in compliance with Sections 177 and 188 of Act, where applicable, and the requisite details have been disclosed in the financial statements etc., as required by the applicable Ind AS.

(xiv) During the year, the Company has made preferential allotment of shares. In respect of the same, in our opinion, the Company has complied with the requirement of Section 42 of the Act and the Rules framed thereunder. Further, in our opinion, the amounts so raised were applied for the purposes for which these securities were issued, though idle funds which were not required for immediate utilisation have been invested in liquid investments, payable on demand. During the year, the Company did not make any private placement of shares or fully/partly convertible debentures.

(xv) In our opinion, the Company has not entered into any non-cash transactions with the directors or persons connected with them covered under Section 192 of the Act.

(xvi) The Company is not required to be registered under Section 45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934.

Annexure II to the Independent Auditor’s Report of even date to the members of Sterling Tools Limited on the standalone financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2018

Annexure II

Independent Auditor’s Report on the Internal Financial Controls under Clause (i) of Sub-section 3 of Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 (‘the Act’)

1. In conjunction with our audit of the standalone financial statements of Sterling Tools Limited (‘the Company’) as at and for the year ended 31 March 2018, we have audited the internal financial controls over financial reporting (‘IFCoFR’) of the Company as at that date.

Management’s Responsibility for Internal Financial Controls

2. The Company’s Board of Directors is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal financial controls based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting (‘the Guidance Note’) issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (‘ICAI’). These responsibilities include the design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls that were operating effectively for ensuring the orderly and efficient conduct of the Company’s business, including adherence to the Company’s policies, the safeguarding of its assets, the prevention and detection of frauds and errors, the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, and the timely preparation of reliable financial information, as required under the Act.

Auditor’s Responsibility

3. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s IFCoFR based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by the ICAI and deemed to be prescribed under Section 143(10) of the Act, to the extent applicable to an audit of IFCoFR, and the Guidance Note issued by the ICAI. Those Standards and the Guidance Note require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether adequate IFCoFR were established and maintained and if such controls operated effectively in all material respects.

4. Our audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the adequacy of the IFCoFR and their operating effectiveness. Our audit of IFCoFR includes obtaining an understanding of IFCoFR, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error.

5. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the Company’s IFCoFR.

Meaning of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting

6. A company’s IFCoFR is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s IFCoFR include those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorisations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorised acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Inherent Limitations of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting

7. Because of the inherent limitations of IFCoFR, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of the IFCoFR to future periods are subject to the risk that the IFCoFR may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Opinion

8. In our opinion, the Company has, in all material respects, adequate internal financial controls over financial reporting and such controls were operating effectively as at 31 March 2018, based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note issued by the ICAI.

For Walker Chandiok & Co LLP

Chartered Accountants

Firm’s Registration No.: 001076N/N500013

per Anamitra Das

Place: Faridabad Partner

Date: 23 May 2018 Membership No.: 062191

---

Mar 31, 2017

Independent Auditor’s Report

TO THE MEMBERS OF STERLING TOOLS LIMITED

Report on the Standalone financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying standalone financial statements of Sterling Tools Limited (“the Company”), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at March 31, 2017, the Statement of Profit and Loss, the Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management’s Responsibility for the Standalone financial Statements

The Company''s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 (“the Act”) with respect to the preparation of these standalone financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies(Accounts) Rules, 2014. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding of the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor’s Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these standalone financial statements based on our audit.

We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made there under.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant to the Company''s preparation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Company''s directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on standalone financial statements.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid standalone financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31, 2017, its profit and cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by section 143(3) of the Act, we report that:

(a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit.

(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books.

(c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account.

(d) In our opinion, the aforesaid standalone financial statements comply with the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014.

(e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on March 31, 2017 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2017 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164(2) of the Act.

(f) With respect to the adequacy of the internal financial controls over financial reporting of the Company and the operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to our separate Report in “Annexure A”.

(g) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor''s Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i. On the basis of written representations received from the management of the Company, the Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position in its financial statements- Refer Note No. 8 “Contingent Liabilities & Commitments "to the financial statements.

ii. The Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses. However, the Company uses derivative financial instruments such as forward contracts to hedge its risks associated with certain foreign currency transactions; which are short term in nature and details of outstanding contracts is disclosed in Note No. 29 of the financial statements

iii. There has been no delay in transferring amounts, required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.

iv. The Company has provided requisite disclosures in the financial statements as regards its holding and dealings in Specified Bank during the period from 8^th November 2016 to 30^th December 2016; and such disclosures are in accordance with the books of account maintained by the Company.-Refer Note No 32 to the financial statements.

2. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2016 (“the Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of Section 143 (11) of the Act, we give in “Annexure B" a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.

Annexure ‘A’ to the Independent Auditors’ Report of even date on the standalone financial statement of Sterling Tools Limited

Report on the Internal Financial Controls under Clause (i) of Sub-section 3 of Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 (“the Act”)

We have audited the internal financial controls over financial reporting of Sterling Tools Limited (“the Company”) as of March 31, 2017 in conjunction with our audit of the standalone financial statements of the Company for the year ended on that date.

Management’s Responsibility for Internal Financial Controls

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal financial controls based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI). These responsibilities include the design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls that were operating effectively for ensuring the orderly and efficient conduct of its business, including adherence to company''s policies, the safeguarding of its assets, the prevention and detection of frauds and errors, the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, and the timely preparation of reliable financial information, as required under the Companies Act, 2013.

Auditors’ Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company''s internal financial controls over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting (the “Guidance Note”) and the Standards on Auditing, issued by ICAI and deemed to be prescribed under section 143(10) of the Companies Act, 2013, to the extent applicable to an audit of internal financial controls, both applicable to an audit of Internal Financial Controls and, both issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards and the Guidance note require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether adequate internal financial controls over financial reporting was established and maintained and if such controls operated effectively in all material respects.

Our audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the adequacy of the internal financial controls system over financial reporting and their operating effectiveness. Our audit of internal financial controls over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal financial controls over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the Company''s internal financial controls system over financial reporting.

Meaning of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting

A Company''s internal financial control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company''s internal financial control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company''s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Inherent Limitations of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting

Because of the inherent limitations of internal financial controls over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of the internal financial controls over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the internal financial control over financial reporting may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Opinion

In our opinion, the Company has, in all material respects, an adequate internal financial controls system over financial reporting and such internal financial controls over financial reporting were operating effectively as at March 31, 2017, based on “the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.

Annexure ‘B’ To the Independent Auditors’ Report

The Annexure referred to in independent Auditors'' Report to the members of the Company on the standalone financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2017; we report that:

i) In respect of fixed assets:

a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

b) The Company has a regular programme of physical verification of its fixed assets by which fixed assets are verified at periodic intervals. In accordance with this programme for the year, no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification. In our opinion, such periodicity of physical verification is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets.

c) On the basis of written representation received from the management of the Company, the title deeds of immovable properties held in the name of the Company are mortgaged with the Banks for securing the long term and short term borrowings raised by the Company.

ii) In respect of its inventory:

a) On the basis of information and explanation provided by the management, inventories have been physically verified by the management during the year. In our opinion, the frequency of physical verification followed by the management is reasonable.

b) No material discrepancies were noticed on verification between the physical stocks and the book records.

iii) (a) to (c) According to the information and explanation given to us, the Company had not granted loans, secured or unsecured, to any of the Companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013. Therefore, the provisions of paragraph 3(iii) (a) to (c) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2016 are not applicable to the Company.

iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanation given to us, the Company has complied with the provisions of section 185 and 186 of the Act in respect of making investments as applicable. However no loans, guarantees & securities have been granted by the Company to the Companies, firms or other parties covered under section 185 and 186 of the Act.

v) The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public. Accordingly, the provisions of paragraph 3(v) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2016 are not applicable to the Company.

vi) On the basis of available information and explanation provided to us, the Central Government has not prescribed maintenance of cost records under sub-section (1) of section 148 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Companies (Cost Records and Audit) Amendment Rules, 2014 dated December 31, 2014 to the current operations carried out by the Company. Accordingly, the provisions of paragraph 3(vi) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2016 are not applicable to the Company.

vii) In respect to statutory dues:

a) The Company is generally regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues including Provident Fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Service Tax, duty of Customs, duty of Excise, Value Added Tax, Cess and any other material statutory dues applicable to it with the appropriate authorities. There were no undisputed amounts payable in respect of Provident Fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Service Tax, duty of Customs, duty of Excise, Value Added Tax, Cess and any other material statutory dues in arrears as at March 31, 2017 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

b) According to the records of the Company examined by us and the information and explanations given to us, there were no dues of Income Tax or Sales Tax or Service Tax or duty of Customs or duty of Excise or Value Added Tax which have not been deposited on account of any dispute except the following, which have not been deposited on account of dispute:

S.No.	Name of the Statute	Nature of Dues	Amount (?)	Period to which amount relates	Forum where dispute is pending
1.	Central Excise Act, 1944	(a) Excise Duty and Penalty	3,990,394	February 2010 -March 2010	CESTAT, New Delhi
		(b) Excise Duty and Penalty	5,326,546	November 2010 -January 2011	CESTAT, New Delhi
2.	Central Excise Act, 1944	Interest on Excise Duty & penalty referred in point 1(a) & (b) above	4,283,637	February 2010 -January 2011	Since excise duty and penalty referred in point1(a) & (b) above are pending at CESTAT, New Delhi, therefore interest relating to said matters will be decided accordingly
3.	Haryana Value Added Tax, 2003	Vat on account of Sale of Capital Goods (Cars)	98,594	A.Y. 2009-10	Hon''ble Haryana Tax Tribunal at Chandigarh
4.	Income Tax Act, 1961	Demand under the Income Tax Act, 1961	61,830	A.Y. 2013-14	Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (Income Tax Department)
5.	Income Tax Act, 1961	Demand under the Income Tax Act, 1961	94,250	A.Y 2014-15	Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (Income Tax Department)

viii) On the basis of information and explanation provided to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of loans and borrowings to financial institution and bank. The Company has not taken any loan from Government or has not issued any debentures.

ix) The Company did not raise any money by the way of initial public or further public offer (including debt instruments) during the year. However, the term loans taken during the year were applied for the purpose for which the same has been raised.

x) According to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud by the Company or on the Company by its officers or employees has been noticed or reported during the year.

xi) The Company has paid/provided managerial remuneration in accordance with provisions of section 197 read with Schedule V to the Companies Act, 2013 as applicable to the Company.

xii) The Company is not a nidhi company and hence, the provisions of paragraph 3(xii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xiii) During the course of our examination of the books and records of the Company, all transactions entered with the related parties are in compliance with sections 177 and 188 of Companies Act, 2013 and the details have been disclosed in the financial statements etc, as required by the applicable accounting standards.

xiv) The Company has not made any preferential allotment or private placement of shares or fully or partly convertible debentures during the year under review. Accordingly, the provisions of paragraph 3(xiv) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xv) The Company has not entered into any non-cash transactions with directors or persons connected with him and hence provisions of section 192 of the Companies Act, 2013 are not applicable.

xvi) The Company is not required to be registered under section 45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934. Accordingly, the provisions of paragraph 3(xvi) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

For S.R. Dinodia & Co. LLP

Chartered Accountants,

Firm Registration Number 001478N/N500005

(Pradeep Dinodia)

Place of Signature: Faridabad Partner

Date:26 May, 2017 Membership No. 080617

---

Mar 31, 2016

TO THE MEMBERS OF STERLING TOOLS LIMITED

Report on the Standalone financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Sterling Tools Limited (“the Company”), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at March 31, 2016, the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory information,

Management’s Responsibility for the Standalone financial Statements

The Company''s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in section 134(5) of the Companies Act,

2013 (“the Act”) with respect to the preparation of these standalone financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding of the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor’s Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these standalone financial statements based on our audit.

We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made there under.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant to the Company''s preparation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Company''s directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on standalone financial statements.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid standalone financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31, 2016, its profit and cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2016 (“the Order”) issued by the Central

Government of India in terms of sub-section (11) of section 143 of the Act, we give in the Annexure A,

a statement on the matters specified in the paragraph 3 and 4 of the order.

2. As required by section 143(3) of the Act, we report that:

(a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit.

(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books.

(c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account.

(d) In our opinion, the aforesaid standalone financial statements comply with the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014.

(e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on March 31, 2016 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2016 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164(2) of the Act.

(f) With respect to the adequacy of the internal financial controls over financial reporting of the Company and the operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to our separate Report in “Annexure-B”.

(g) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor''s Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i. On the basis of written representations received from the management of the Company, the Company does not have any pending litigations which would impact its financial position; except for the cases which are disclosed under sub-note “Contingent Liabilities & Commitments” under Note No. 8 of the financial statements.

ii. The Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses. However, the Company uses derivative financial instruments such as forward contracts to hedge its risks associated with certain foreign currency transactions; which are short term in nature and details of outstanding contracts is disclosed in Note No. 29 of the financial statements.

iii. There were no amounts which were required to be transferred to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.

Annexure ‘A’ To the Independent Auditors’ Report

The Annexure referred to in independent Auditors'' Report to the members of the Company on the standalone financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2016, we report that:

i) In respect of fixed assets:

a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

b) The Company has a regular programmed of physical verification of its fixed assets by which fixed assets are verified at periodic intervals. In accordance with this programmed for the year, no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification. In our opinion, such periodicity of physical verification is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets.

c) On the basis of written representation received from the management of the Company, the title deeds of immovable properties held in the name of the Company are mortgaged with the Banks for securing the long term borrowings and credit limits raised by the Company.

ii) In respect of its inventory:

a) On the basis of information and explanation provided by the management, inventories have been physically verified by the management during the year. In our opinion the frequency of physical verification followed by the management is reasonable.

b) No material discrepancies were noticed on verification between the physical stocks and the book records.

iii) (a) to (c) According to the information and explanation given to us, the Company had not granted loans, secured or unsecured, to any of the Companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013. Therefore, the provisions of paragraph 3(iii) (a) to (c) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2016 are not applicable to the Company.

iv) According to the information and explanation given to us, The Company has no loans, investments, guarantees, and security covered under the provisions of section 185 and 186 of the Companies Act, 2013. Therefore, the provisions of paragraph 3(iv) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order,

2016 are not applicable to the Company.

v) The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public.

vi) On the basis of available information and explanation provided to us, the Central Government has not prescribed maintenance of cost records under sub-section (1) of section 148 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Companies (Cost Records and Audit) Amendment Rules, 2014 dated December 31, 2014 to the current operations carried out by the Company. Accordingly, the provisions of paragraph 3(vi) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2016 are not applicable to the Company.

vii) (a) The Company is generally regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, employees'' state insurance, income tax, sales tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value added tax, cases and any other statutory dues with appropriate authorities.

Further there were no undisputed outstanding statutory dues as on the last day of the financial year concerned for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(b) According to the records of the Company examined by us and the information and explanations given to us, there were no dues of income tax or sales tax or service tax or duty of customs or duty of excise or value added tax, except the following, which have not been deposited on account of any dispute:

S.No.	Name of the Statute	Nature of Dues	Amount (Rs.)	Period to which amount relates	Forum where dispute is pending
1.	Central Excise Act, 1944	(a) Excise Duty and Penalty	3,990,394	February 2010-March 2010	CESTAT, New Delhi
		(b) Excise Duty and Penalty	5,326,546	November 2010-January 2011	CESTAT, New Delhi
		(c) Excise Duty and Penalty	22,226,095	February 2011 -September 2015	Office of Commissioner of Central Excise Audit - II
2.	Central Excise Act, 1944	Interest on Excise Duty & penalty referred in point 1(a) & (b) above	3,678,036	February 2010-January 2011	Since excise duty and penalty referred in point 1(a) & (b) above are pending at CESTAT, New Delhi, therefore interest relating to said matters will be decided accordingly
3.	Haryana Value Added Tax, 2003	Vat on account of Sale of Capital Goods (Cars)	98,594	A.Y. 2009-10	Hon''ble Haryana Tax Tribunal at Chandigarh
4.	Haryana Value Added Tax, 2003	Liability of Sales Tax due to pending C Forms	144,169,643	A.Y. 2013-14 to A.Y. 2015-16	Jurisdictional Assessing Officer. (Haryana Value Added Tax Department)
5.	Income Tax Act, 1961	Demand under the Income Tax Act, 1961	62,830	A.Y. 2013-14	Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (Income Tax Department)
6.	Income Tax Act, 1961	Demand under the Income Tax Act, 1961	1,185,580	A.Y. 2014-15	Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (Income Tax Department)

viii) On the basis of information and explanation provided to us, Company has not defaulted in repayment of loans and borrowings to the bank. However, there were no dues outstanding towards debenture holders as at March 31, 2016.

ix) The Company did not raise any money by the way of initial public or further public offer (including debt instruments) during the year. However, the term loans taken during the year were applied for the purpose for which the same has been raised.

x) According to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud by the Company or on the Company by its officers or employees has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.

xi) The Company has paid or provided managerial remuneration to its directors during the year in accordance with provisions of section 197 read with Schedule V to the Companies Act, 2013 as applicable to the Company.

xii) The Company is not a nidhi company hence the provisions of paragraph 3(xii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xiii) During the course of our examination of the books and records of the Company, all transactions entered with the related parties are in compliance with section 177 and 188 of Companies Act, 2013 and the details have been disclosed in the financial statements etc, as required by the applicable accounting standards.

xiv) The Company has not made any preferential allotment or private placement of shares or fully or partly convertible debentures during the year under review. Accordingly, the provisions of paragraph 3(xiv) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xv) The Company has not entered into any non-cash transactions with directors or persons connected with him. Accordingly, the provisions of paragraph 3(xv) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

xvi) The Company is not required to be registered under section 45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934. Accordingly, the provisions of paragraph 3(xvi) of the Order are not applicable to the

Annexure ‘B’ to the Independent Auditors’ Report of even date on the standalone financial statement of Sterling Tools Limited

Report on the Internal Financial Controls under Clause (i) of Sub-section 3 of Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 (“the Act”)

We have audited the internal financial controls over financial reporting of Sterling Tools Limited (“the Company”) as of March 31, 2016 in conjunction with our audit of the standalone financial statements of the Company for the year ended on that date.

Management’s Responsibility for Internal financial Controls

The Company''s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal financial controls based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI). These responsibilities include the design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls that were operating effectively for ensuring the orderly and efficient conduct of its business, including adherence to company''s policies, the safeguarding of its assets, the prevention and detection of frauds and errors, the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, and the timely preparation of reliable financial information, as required under the Companies Act, 2013.

Auditors’ Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company''s internal financial controls over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting (the “Guidance Note”) and the Standards on Auditing, issued by ICAI and deemed to be prescribed under section 143(10) of the Companies Act, 2013, to the extent applicable to an audit of internal financial controls, both applicable to an audit of Internal Financial Controls and, both issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards and the Guidance note require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether adequate internal financial controls over financial reporting was established and maintained and if such controls operated effectively in all material respects.

Our audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the adequacy of the internal financial controls system over financial reporting and their operating effectiveness. Our audit of internal financial controls over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal financial controls over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the Company''s internal financial controls system over financial reporting.

Meaning of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting

A Company''s internal financial control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal financial control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and

(3) Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Inherent Limitations of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting

Because of the inherent limitations of internal financial controls over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of the internal financial controls over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the internal financial control over financial reporting may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Opinion

In our opinion, the Company has, in all material respects, an adequate internal financial controls system over financial reporting and such internal financial controls over financial reporting were operating effectively as at March 31, 2016, based on “the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.

For S.R. Dinodia & Co.LLP

Chartered Accountants,

Firm Registration Number 001478N/N500005

(Pradeep Dinodia)

Place of Signature: Faridabad Partner

Date: 20 May, 2016 Membership No. 080617

---

Mar 31, 2015

1. We have audited the accompanying financial statements of M/S STERLING TOOLS LIMITED ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at March 31,2015, and the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

2. Management's Responsibility for the Financial Statements

The Company's Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act") with respect to the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records inaccordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

3. Auditor's Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made thereunder.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

4. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant to the Company's preparation of the financial statements that give true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on whether the Company has in place an adequate internal financial controls system over financial reporting and the operating effectiveness of such controls. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by Company's directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

5. Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31, 2015;

(b) in the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the Profit for the year ended on that date; and

(c) In the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

6. Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2015 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (11) of section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.

2. As required by section 143(3) of the Companies Act 2013, we report that:

a. We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;

b. In our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books and further proper returns adequate for the purpose of audit has been received from the branches not visited by us;

c. The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account;

d. In our opinion, the aforesaid financial statements comply with the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014.

e. In our opinion there are no financial transactions or matters that may have adverse effect on the functioning of the Company

f. On the basis of written representations received from the directors as on March 31,2015 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31,2015 from being appointed as a director in terms of sub-section (2) of section 164 of the Companies Act, 2013;

g. With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor's Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i. On the basis of written representation received from the management of the Company, no litigation is pending against the Company's which would impact its financial position.

ii. The Company did not have any long term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses.

iii. There were no amounts which were required to be transferred to the Investor Education and Protection Fund.

ANNEXURE TO THE AUDITORS’ REPORT

(Referred to in Paragraph 1 under the heading of "Report on Other Legal & Regulatory Requirements" of our report of even date)

RE: M/S STERLING TOOLS LIMITED

i) a) The company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitativedetails and situation of fixed assets.

b) All the assets have been physically verified by the management during the year and there is a regular programme of verification which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

ii) The inventory, except goods in transit, has been physically verified by the management during the year. In our opinion, the frequency of such verification is reasonable.

b) The procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the company and the nature of business.

c) The company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The discrepancies noticed on verification between the physical stocks and the book records have been properly dealt with in the books of account.

iii) (a) to (b) According to the information and explanation given to us, the company had not granted loan to any of the Company covered in the register maintained under section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013. Therefore, the provisions of clause 3(iii) (a) to (b) of the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2015 are not applicable to the company.

iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there are adequate internal control systems commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard to purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services. Further, on the basis of our examination of the books and records of the Company, carried out in accordance with the generally accepted auditing practices, there is no continuing failure to correct the weaknesses in the aforesaid internal control systems.

v) In our opinion and according to the information and explanation given to us, since the company has not accepted any deposits within the meaning of section 73 to 76 of the Companies Act, 2013, therefore the question of the compliance of any directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and the provisions of sections 73 to 76 or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act and the rules framed there under does not arise.

vi) We have broadly reviewed the books of accounts maintained by the Company pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under sub-section (1) of section 148 of the Companies Act, 2013 and are of the opinion that, prime facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have not, however, made a detailed examination of the records with a view of determine whether they are accurate or complete.

vii) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of our examination of the records of the company, amounts deducted/accrued in the books of account in respect of undisputed statutory dues including Provident Fund, Employees' State insurance, Income tax, Sales tax, Service tax, Customs duty, Excise duty, Investor Education and Protection Fund, cess and other material statutory dues have generally been regularly deposited during the year by the Company with the appropriate authorities, According to the information and explanations given to us no undisputed amounts payable in respect of Provident Fund, Employees' State insurance, Income tax, Sales tax, Service tax, Customs duty, Excise duty, Investor Education and Protection Fund, cess and other material statutory dues were in arrears as at 31st March,2015 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(b) According to the records of the Company examined by us and the information and explanations given to us, there are no dues of income tax and other statutory dues, except the following, which have not been deposited on account of any dispute.

The following dues of Excise duty have not been deposited by the Company on account of dispute:

Name of the Nature of Amount Period to which Statute Dues (Rupees) amount relates

a) Central Excise Duty 189,015,254 June 2006-Dec Excise Act and Penalty 2008

106,987,422 Jan 2009-Oct 2010 3,990,394 February 2010-March 2010 5,326,546 November 2010-January 2011

b)Central Interest on 132,201,996 June 2006-January Excise Act Excise Duty & 2011 penalty referred in clause (a) above

c) Haryana Vat on account 98,594 A.Y. 2009-10 Value Added of Sale of Tax, 2003 Capital Goods (cars)

d) Income Income 137,500 A.Y 2012-13 Tax Act, 1961 tax liability on account of disallowance u/s 14A of Income tax Act, 1961

e) Income Refund of 9,532,772 A.Y 2012-13 Tax Act, 1961 A.Y 2012-13 is adjusted against interest u/s 234B of Income tax Act, 1961

Name of the Forum where dispute is Statute pending

a) Central CESTAT, New Delhi Excise Act

CESTAT, New Delhi CESTAT, New Delhi

CESTAT, New Delhi

b)Central Since excise duty and penalty Excise Act referred in clause a) above is pending at CESTAT, New Delhi, therefore interest relating to said matters will be decided accordingly

c) Haryana Hon'ble Haryana Tax Tribunal Value Added at Chandigarh Tax, 2003

d) Income CIT (Appeals), VIII, New Delhi Tax Act, 1961

e) Income Rectification u/s 154 of Tax Act, 1961 Income tax Act, 1961 is pending at Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 24(2), New Delhi.

(c) On the basis of information and explanations given to us by the management, no amount was required to be transferred to investor education and protection fund in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) and rules made there under.

viii) The company does not have any accumulated losses at the end of the financial year and has not incurred cash losses during the financial year covered by our audit and in the immediately preceding financial year.

ix) In our opinion and on the basis of information and explanation given to us, the company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to banks during the year. There were no dues payable to any financial institution or debenture holders.

x) In our opinion and on the basis of information and explanation given to us, the company has not given guarantees for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions. Therefore, the provisions of clause 3(x) of the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2015 are not applicable to the company.

xi) On the basis of information and explanation given to us, we are of opinion that the term loans were applied for the purposes for which the loans were obtained.

xii) During the course of our examination of the books and records of the Company carried out in accordance with the generally accepted auditing practices in India, we have neither come across any instance of fraud on or by the Company, noticed or reported during the year, nor have been informed of such case by the management.

For S. R. DINODIA & CO. LLP.

CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS, REGN. NO.001478N/N500005

(SANDEEP DINODIA) PARTNER M.NO. 083689

PLACE: NEW DELHI DATE : 25 MAY 2015

---

Mar 31, 2014

1. Report on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of M/S STERLING TOOLS LIMITED, ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 31st March, 2014, and the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

2. Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act") read with the General Circular No. 15/2013 dated 13th September 2013 of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs in respect of Section 133 of the Companies Act 2013. This responsibility includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

3. Auditor''s Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

4. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Company''s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity''s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

5. Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

(a) In the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31st March 2014;

(b) In the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the Profit for the year ended on that date; and

(c) In the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

6. Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Act, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.

As required by section 227(3) of the Act, we report that:

a. we have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;

b. in our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

c. the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account;

d. in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards referred to in subsection (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 read with the General Circular No. 15/2013 dated 13th September 2013 of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs in respect of Section 133 of the Companies Act 2013;

e. On the basis of written representations received from the directors as on 31st March 2014 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March 2014 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;

f. Since the Central Government has not issued any notification as to the rate at which the cess is to be paid under section 441A of the Companies Act, 1956 nor has it issued any Rules under the said section, prescribing the manner in which such cess is to be paid, no cess is due and payable by the Company.

ANNEXURE TO THE AUDITORS'' REPORT (Referred to in paragraph 6 of our audit report of even date) RE: M/S STERLING TOOLS LIMITED

(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) All the assets have been physically verified by the management during the year and there is a regular programme of verification which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

(c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, fixed assets disposed off during the year were not substantial, and therefore, do not affect the going concern assumption.

(ii) (a) The inventory, except goods in transit, has been physically verified by the management during the year. In our opinion, the frequency of such verification is reasonable.

(b) The procedures for physical verification of inventories followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

(c) The company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The discrepancies noted between the stocks as per physical verification and the book records have been properly dealt with in the books of account.

(iii) As informed, the Company has neither granted nor taken any loans, secured or unsecured, to/from companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, provisions of paragraph 4(iii) (b), (c), (d), (f) and (g) of the Order are not applicable.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there are adequate internal control systems commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard to purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods. Further, on the basis of our examination of the books and records of the Company, carried out in accordance with the generally accepted auditing practices, there is no continuing failure to correct the weaknesses in the aforesaid internal control systems.

(v) (a) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to in Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been entered in the register required to be maintained under that section.

(b) In our opinion and according to explanation given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or arrangements entered in the register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 and exceeding values of Rs.5 Lacs have been made at prices which are reasonable with regard to the prevailing market prices at the relevant times.

(vi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not accepted any deposits within the meaning of section 58A, 58AA and the other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and rules framed there-under.

(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with its size and nature of its business.

(viii) We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the Company pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under section 209 (1) (d) of the Companies Act,1956 and are of the opinion that, prime facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have not, however, made a detailed examination of the records with a view of determine whether they are accurate or complete.

(ix) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of our examination of the records of the company, amounts deducted/accrued in the books of account in respect of undisputed statutory dues including Provident Fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Income-tax, Sales-tax, Customs duty, Excise duty, Service tax, Investor Education and Protection Fund and other material statutory dues have generally been regularly deposited during the year by the Company with the appropriate authorities, According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of Provident Fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Income- tax, Customs duty, Service tax, Investor Education and Protection Fund and cess and other material statutory dues were in arrears as at 31 March 2014 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, there are no dues of Income-tax, Customs duty, Sales tax, Service Tax, Wealth tax and Cess which have not been deposited with the appropriate authorities on account of any dispute.

The following dues of Excise duty have not been deposited by the Company on account of dispute:

Name of the Nature of Amount Period to Forum where Statute Dues (Rupees) which amount relates dispute is pending

Central Excise Act Excise Duty 189,015,254 June 2006- Dec 2008 CESTAT, New Delhi and Penalty 106,987,422 Jan 2009-Oct 2010 CESTAT, New Delhi

3,990,394 February 2010- March 2010 CESTAT, New Delhi

5,326,546 November 2010-CESTAT, New Delhi January 2011

544,764 October 2004- Comissioner (Appeals), November 2004 Customs & Central Excise, Delhi-IV, New CGO Complex, NH-IV Faridabad.

(x) The company does not have any accumulated losses at the end of the financial year and has not incurred cash losses during the financial year covered by our audit and in the immediately preceding financial year.

(xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to banks during the year. There were no dues payable to any financial institution or debenture holders.

(xii) The company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xii) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the company.

(xiii) The company is not a chit fund or a nidhi mutual benefit fund society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the company.

(xiv) The company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the company.

(xv) In our opinion and on the basis of information and explanation given to us, the company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xv) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the company.

(xvi) On the basis of information and explanation given to us, we are of opinion that the term loans were applied for the purposes for which the loans were obtained.

(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of an overall examination of the balance sheet of the company, in our opinion, funds raised on short term basis have not been used for long term investments.

(xviii)During the year, the Company has not allotted any shares on preferential basis to parties and companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(xix) The Company has not issued any debentures during the year. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xix) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.

(xx) According to the information and explanation given to us, the company has not raised any money by way of public issue during the year covered under audit. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xx) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.

(xxi) During the course of our examination of the books and records of the Company carried out in accordance with the generally accepted auditing practices in India and according to the information and explanation given to us, we have neither come across any instance of fraud on or by the Company, noticed or reported during the year nor have we been informed of such case by the management.

For S.R.DINODIA & CO. LLP.

CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

Reg. No. 01478N/N500005

(SANDEEP DINODIA) PLACE : NEW DELHI PARTNER

DATE : 30.05.2014 M. NO. 083689

---

Mar 31, 2013

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of M/S STERLING TOOLS LIMITED, ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 31st March, 2013, and the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act"). This responsibility includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor''s Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Company''s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31 st March 2013;

(b) in the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the Profit for the year ended on that date; and

(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Act, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.

As required by section 227(3) of the Act, we report that:

a. we have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;

b. in our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

c. the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account;

d. in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards referred to in subsection (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956;

e. On the basis of written representations received from the directors as on 31 st March 2013 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March 2013 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;

f. Since the Central Government has not issued any notification as to the rate at which the cess is to be paid under section 441A of the Companies Act, 1956 nor has it issued any Rules under the said section, prescribing the manner in which such cess is to be paid, no cess is due and payable by the Company.

ANNEXURE TO THE AUDITORS'' REPORT

(Referred to in paragraph 6 of our audit report of even date)

RE: M/S STERLING TOOLS LIMITED

(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) All the assets have been physically verified by the management during the year and there is a regular programme of verification which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

(c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, fixed assets disposed off during the year were not substantial, and therefore, do not affect the going concern assumption.

(ii) (a) The inventory, except goods in transit, has been physically verified by the management during the year. In our opinion, the frequency of such verification is reasonable.

(b) The procedures for physical verification of inventories followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

(c) The company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The discrepancies noted between the stocks as per physical verification and the book records have been properly dealt with in the books of account.

(iii) As informed, the Company has neither granted nor taken any loans, secured or unsecured, to/from companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, provisions of paragraph 4(iii) (b), (c), (d), (f) and (g) of the Order are not applicable.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there are adequate internal control systems commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard to purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods. Further, on the basis of our examination of the books and records of the Company, carried out in accordance with the generally accepted auditing practices, there is no continuing failure to correct the weaknesses in the aforesaid internal control systems.

(v) (a) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to in Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been entered in the register required to be maintained under that section.

(b) In our opinion and according to explanation given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or arrangements entered in the register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 and exceeding values of Rs.5 Lacs have been made at prices which are reasonable with regard to the prevailing market prices at the relevant times.

(vi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not accepted any deposits within the meaning of section 58A, 58AAand the other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and rules framed there-under.

(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with its size and nature of its business.

(viii) We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the Company pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under section 209 (1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 and are of the opinion that, prime facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have not, however, made a detailed examination of the records with a view of determine whether they are accurate or complete.

(ix) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of our examination of the records of the company, amounts deducted/accrued in the books of account in respect of undisputed statutory dues including Provident Fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Income-tax, Sales-tax, Customs duty, Excise duty, Service tax, Investor Education and Protection Fund and other material statutory dues have generally been regularly deposited during the year by the Company with the appropriate authorities,

According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of Provident Fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Income-tax, Customs duty, Service tax, Investor Education and Protection Fund and cess and other material statutory dues were in arrears as at 31 March 2013 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, there are no dues of Income-tax, Customs duty, Sales tax, Service Tax, Wealth tax and Cess which have not been deposited with the appropriate authorities on account of any dispute.

(x) The company does not have any accumulated losses at the end of the financial year and has not incurred cash losses during the financial year covered by our audit and in the immediately preceding financial year.

(xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to banks during the year. There were no dues payable to any financial institution or debenture holders.

(xii) The company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xii) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the company.

(xiii) The company is not a chit fund or a nidhi mutual benefit fund society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the company.

(xiv) The company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the company.

(xv) In our opinion and on the basis of information and explanation given to us, the company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xv) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the company.

(xvi) On the basis of information and explanation given to us, we are of opinion that the term loans were applied for the purposes for which the loans were obtained.

(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of an overall examination of the balance sheet of the company, in our opinion, funds raised on short term basis have not been used for long term investments.

(xviii)During the year, the Company has not allotted any shares on preferential basis to parties and companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(xix) The Company has not issued any debentures during the year. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xix) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.

(xx) According to the information and explanation given to us, the company has not raised any money by way of public issue during the year covered under audit. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xx) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.

(xxi) During the course of our examination of the books and records of the Company carried out in accordance with the generally accepted auditing practices in India and according to the information and explanation given to us, we have neither come across any instance of fraud on or by the Company, noticed or reported during the year nor have we been informed of such case by the management.

For S. R. DINODIA & CO.

CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

Reg. No. 001478N

(SANDEEP DINODIA)

Place: New Delhi PARTNER

Date: 13.05.2013 M.NO. 083689

---

Mar 31, 2012

1. We have audited the attached balance sheet of M/S STERLING TOOLS LIMITED, as at 31 March 2012, the profit and loss account and also the cash flow statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes (a) examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statement (b) assessing the accounting principles used in the preparation of the financial statements (c) assessing significant estimates made by management in the preparation of the financial statements and (d) evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

3. As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 [as amended by the Companies (Auditor's Report) (Amendment) Order 2004] issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.

4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report that:

(i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

(ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

(iii) The balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash flow statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

(iv) In our opinion, the balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash flow statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956;

(v) On the basis of written representations received from the directors as on 31 March 2012 and taken on record by the Board of Directors. We report that none of the directors is disqualified as on 31 March 2012 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;

(vi) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956 in the manner so required; and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

(a) In the case of the balance sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31 March 2012;

(b) in the case of the profit and loss account, the profit for the year ended on that date; and

(c) in the case of the cash flow statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) All the assets have been physically verified by the management during the year and there is a regular programme of verification which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

(c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, fixed assets disposed off during the year were not substantial, and therefore, do not affect the going concern assumption.

(ii) (a) The inventory, except goods in transit, has been physically verified by the management during the year. In our opinion, the frequency of such verification is reasonable.

(b) The procedures for physical verification of inventories followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

(c) The company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The discrepancies noted between the stocks as per physical verification and the book records have been properly dealt with in the books of account.

(iii) As informed, the Company has neither granted nor taken any loans, secured or unsecured, to/from companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, provisions of paragraph 4(iii)(b), (c), (d), (f)and (g) of the Order are not applicable.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there are adequate internal control systems commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard to purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods. Further, on the basis of our examination of the books and records of the Company, carried out in accordance with the generally accepted auditing practices, there is no continuing failure to correct the weaknesses in the aforesaid internal control systems.

(v) (a) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to in Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been entered in the register required to be maintained under that section.

(b) In our opinion and according to explanation given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or arrangements entered in the register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 and exceeding values of Rs.5 Lacs have been made at prices which are reasonable with regard to the prevailing market prices at the relevant times.

(vi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not accepted any deposits within the meaning of section 58A, 58AA and the other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and rules framed there-under.

(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with its size and nature of its business.

(viii) We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the Company pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under section 209 (1) (d) of the Companies Act,1956 and are of the opinion that, prime facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have not, however, made a detailed examination of the records with a view of determine whether they are accurate or complete.

(ix) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of our examination of the records of the company, amounts deducted/accrued in the books of account in respect of undisputed statutory dues including Provident Fund, Employees' State Insurance, Income-tax, Sales-tax, Customs duty, Excise duty, Service tax, Investor Education and Protection Fund and other material statutory dues have generally been regularly deposited during the year by the Company with the appropriate authorities, According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of Provident Fund, Employees' State Insurance, Income- tax, Customs duty, Service tax, Investor Education and Protection Fund and cess and other material statutory dues were in arrears as at 31 March 2012 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, there are no dues of Income-tax, Customs duty, Sales tax, Service Tax, Wealth tax and Cess which have not been deposited with the appropriate authorities on account of any dispute.

The following dues of Excise duty have not been deposited by the Company on account of dispute:

Name of the Nature of Amount Period to Forum where Statute Dues (Rupees) which amount dispute is relates pending

Central Excise Act Excise Duty 335,825 2006-2007 'Faridabad' Range - 24

189,015,254 June 2006- Dec 2008 CESTAT, New Delhi

106,987,422 Jan 2009- 0ct 2010 CESTAT, New Delhi

(x) The company does not have any accumulated losses at the end of the financial year and has not incurred cash losses during the financial year covered by our audit and in the immediately preceding financial year.

(xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to banks during the year. There were no dues payable to any financial institution or debenture holders.

(xii) The company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xii) of the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the company.

(xiii) The company is not a chit fund or a nidhi mutual benefit fund society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the company.

(xiv) The company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the company.

(xv) In our opinion and on the basis of information and explanation given to us, the company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xv) of the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the company.

(xvi) On the basis of information and explanation given to us, we are of opinion that the term loans were applied for the purposes for which the loans were obtained.

(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of an overall examination of the balance sheet of the company, in our opinion, funds raised on short term basis have not been used for long term investments.

(xviii)During the year, the Company has not allotted any shares on preferential basis to parties and companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(xix) The Company has not issued any debentures during the year. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xix) of the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.

(xx) According to the information and explanation given to us, the company has not raised any money by way of public issue during the year covered under audit. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xx) of the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.

(xxi) During the course of our examination of the books and records of the Company carried out in accordance with the generally accepted auditing practices in India and according to the information and explanation given to us, we have neither come across any instance of fraud on or by the Company, noticed or reported during the year nor have we been informed of such case by the management.

For S.R.DINODIA & CO.

CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

Reg. No. 01478N

(SANDEEP DINODIA)

PLACE: NEW DELHI PARTNER

DATE : 15.05.2012 M. NO. 83689

---

Mar 31, 2011

1. We have audited the attached balance sheet of M/S STERLING TOOLS LIMITED, as at 31 March 2011, the profit and loss account and also the cash flow statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes (a) examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statement (b) assessing the accounting principles used in the preparation of the financial statements (c) assessing significant estimates made by management in the preparation of the financial statements and (d) evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 [as amended by the Companies (Auditors Report) (Amendment) Order 2004] issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.

4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report that:

(i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

(ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

(iii) The balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash flow statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

(iv) In our opinion, the balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash flow statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956;

(v) On the basis of written representations received from the directors as on 31 March 2011 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on 31 March 2011 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;

(vi) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956 in the manner so required; and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

(a) In the case of the balance sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31 March 2011;

(b) in the case of the profit and loss account, the profit for the year ended on that date; and

(c) in the case of the cash flow statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

NNEXURE TO THE AUDITORS REPORT (Referred to in paragraph 3 of our audit report of even date) RE: M/S STERLING TOOLS LIMITED

(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) All the assets have been physically verified by the management during the year and there is a regular programme of verification which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

(c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, fixed assets disposed off during the year were not substantial, and therefore, do not affect the going concern assumption.

(ii) (a) The inventory, except goods in transit, has been physically verified by the management during the year. In our opinion, the frequency of such verification is reasonable.

(b) The procedures for physical verification of inventories followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

(c) The company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The discrepancies noted between the stocks as per physical verification and the book records have been properly dealt with in the books of account.

(iii) As informed, the Company has neither granted nor taken any loans, secured or unsecured, to/from companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, provisions of paragraph 4(iii) (b), (c), (d), (f) and (g) of the Order are not applicable.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there are adequate internal control systems commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard to purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods. Further, on the basis of our examination of the books and records of the Company, carried out in accordance with the generally accepted auditing practices, there is no continuing failure to correct the weaknesses in the aforesaid internal control systems.

(v) (a) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to in Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been entered in the register required to be maintained under that section.

(b) In our opinion and according to explanation given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or arrangements entered in the register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 and exceeding values of Rs.5 Lacs have been made at prices which are reasonable with regard to the prevailing market prices at the relevant times.

(vi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not accepted any deposits within the meaning of section 58A, 58AA and the other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and rules framed there-under.

(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with its size and nature of its business.

(viii) We have broadly reviewed the books of accounts maintained by the Company pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under section 209 (1) (d) of the

Companies Act,1956 and are of the opinion that, prime facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have not, however, made a detailed examination of the records with a view of determine whether they are accurate or complete.

(ix) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of our examination of the records of the company, amounts deducted/accrued in the books of account in respect of undisputed statutory dues including Provident Fund, Employees State Insurance, Income-tax, Sales-tax, Customs duty, Excise duty, Service tax, Investor Education and Protection Fund and other material statutory dues have generally been regularly deposited during the year by the Company with the appropriate authorities,

According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of Provident Fund, Employees State Insurance, Income-tax, Customs duty, Service tax, Investor Education and Protection Fund and cess and other material statutory dues were in arrears as at 31 March 2011 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, there are no dues of Income-tax, Customs duty, Sales tax, Wealth tax and Cess which have not been deposited with the appropriate authorities on account of any dispute.

The following dues of Excise duty and Service tax have not been deposited by the Company on account of dispute:

Name of the Nature of Amount Period to Forum where Statute Dues (Rupees) which amount dispute is relates pending

Central Excise Excise Duty 335,825 2006-2007 Faridabad Range Act -24 451,784 2006-2007 Faridabad Range -17 30,073,430 2006-2007, 2007-2008 Faridabad Range -8 & 2008-2009, (up to September 2008

189,015,254 June 2006-Dec CESTAT, New Delhi 2008 106,987,422 January 2009- CESTAT, New Delhi Oct 2010

(x) The company does not have any accumulated losses at the end of the financial year and has not incurred cash losses during the financial year covered by our audit and in the immediately preceding financial year.

(xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to banks during the year. There were no dues payable to any financial institution or debenture holders.

(xii) The company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xii) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the company.

(xiii) The company is not a chit fund or a nidhi mutual benefit fund society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the company.

(xiv) The company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the company.

(xv) In our opinion and on the basis of information and explanation given to us, the company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xv) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the company.

(xvi) On the basis of information and explanation given to us, we are of opinion that the term loans were applied for the purposes for which the loans were obtained.

(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of an overall examination of the balance sheet of the company, in our opinion, funds raised on short term basis have not been used for long term investments.

(xviii)During the year, the Company has not allotted any shares on preferential basis to parties and companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(xix) The Company has not issued any debentures during the year. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xix) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.

(xx) According to the information and explanation given to us, the company has not raised any money by way of public issue during the period covered under audit. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xx) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.

(xxi) During the course of our examination of the books and records of the Company carried out in accordance with the generally accepted auditing practices in India and according to the information and explanation given to us, we have neither come across any instance of fraud on or by the Company, noticed or reported during the year nor have we been informed of such case by the management.



For S.R.DINODIA & CO. CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS Reg. No. 01478N



(SANDEEP DINODIA) PARTNER M. NO. 83689

PLACE : NEW DELHI DATE : 17th May, 2011

---

Mar 31, 2010

1. We have audited the attached balance sheet of M/S STERLING TOOLS LIMITED, as at 31 March 2010, the profit and loss account and also the cash flow statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes (a) examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statement (b) assessing the accounting principles used in the preparation of the financial statements (c) assessing significant estimates made by management in the preparation of the financial statements and (d) evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 [as amended by the Companies (Auditors Report) (Amendment) Order 2004] issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.

4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report that:

(i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

(ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

(iii) The balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash flow statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

(iv) In our opinion, the balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash flow statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956;

(v) On the basis of written representations received from the directors as on 31 March 2010 and taken on record by the Board of Directors. We report that none of the directors is disqualified as on 31 March 2010 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;

(vi) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956 in the manner so required; and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

(a) In the case of the balance sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31 March 2010;

(b) in the case of the profit and loss account, the profit for the year ended on that date; and

(c) in the case of the cash flow statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

ANNEXURE TO THE AUDITORS REPORT

(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) All the assets have been physically verified by the management during the year and there is a regular programme of verification which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

(c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, fixed assets disposed off during the year were not substantial, and therefore, do not affect the going concern assumption.

(ii) (a) The inventory, except goods in transit, has been physically verified by the management during the year. In our opinion, the frequency of such verification is reasonable.

(b) The procedures for physical verification of inventories followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

(c) The company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The discrepancies noted between the stocks as per physical verification and the book records have been properly dealt with in the books of account.

(iii) As informed, the Company has neither granted nor taken any loans, secured or unsecured, to/from companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, provisions of paragraph 4(iii) (b), (c), (d), (f) and (g) of the Order are not applicable.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there are adequate internal control systems commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard to purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods. Further, on the basis of our examination of the books and records of the Company, carried out in accordance with the generally accepted auditing practices, there is no continuing failure to correct the weaknesses in the aforesaid internal control systems.

(v) (a) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to in Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been entered in the register required to be maintained under that section.

(b) In our opinion and according to explanation given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or arrangements entered in the register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 and exceeding values of Rs.5 Lacs have been made at prices which are reasonable with regard to the prevailing market prices at the relevant times.

(vi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not accepted any deposits within the meaning of section 58A, 58AA and the other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and rules framed there-under.

(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with its size and nature of its business.

(viii) We have broadly reviewed the books of accounts maintained by the Company pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under section 209 (1) (d) of the Companies Act,1956 and are of the opinion that, prime facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have not, however, made a detailed examination of the records with a view of determine whether they are accurate or complete.

(ix) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of our examination of the records of the company, amounts deducted/accrued in the books of account in respect of undisputed statutory dues including Provident Fund, Employees State Insurance, Income-tax, Sales-tax, Customs duty, Excise duty, Service tax, Investor Education and Protection Fund and other material statutory dues have generally been regularly deposited during the year by the Company with the appropriate authorities,

According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of Provident Fund, Employees State Insurance, Income-tax, Customs duty, Service tax, Investor Education and Protection Fund and cess and other material statutory dues were in arrears as at 31 March 2010 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, there are no dues of Income-tax, Customs duty, Sales tax, Wealth tax and Cess which have not been deposited with the appropriate authorities on account of any dispute.

The following dues of Excise duty and Service tax have not been deposited by the Company on account of dispute:

Name of the Nature of Amount Period to Forum where

Statute Dues (Rupees) which amount dispute is relates pending

Central Excise Excise Duty 335,825 2006-2007 Faridabad Range-24 and Salt Act 451,784 2006-2007 Faridabad Range-17 6,196,734 2006-2007, 2007-2008 Faridabad Range-8 & 2008-2009, (up to September 2008

Central Excise Service Tax 2,285,015 2005-2006 Faridabad Range-24 and Salt Act 2,629,127 2006-2007 Faridabad Range-24 7,725,685 2006-2007 Faridabad Range-17 4,835,135 2007-2008 Faridabad Range-24

(x) The company does not have any accumulated losses at the end of the financial year and has not incurred cash losses during the financial year covered by our audit and in the immediately preceding financial year.

(xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to banks during the year. There were no dues payable to any financial institution or debenture holders.

(xii) The company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xii) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the company.

(xiii) The company is not a chit fund or a nidhi mutual benefit fund society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the company.

(xiv) The company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the company.

(xv) In our opinion and on the basis of information and explanation given to us, the company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xv) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the company.

(xvi) On the basis of information and explanation given to us, we are of opinion that the term loans were applied for the purposes for which the loans were obtained.

(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of an overall examination of the balance sheet of the company, in our opinion, funds raised on short term basis have not been used for long term investments.

(xviii)During the year, the Company has not allotted any shares on preferential basis to parties and companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

(xix) The Company has not issued any debentures during the year. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xix) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.

(xx) According to the information and explanation given to us, the company has not raised any money by way of public issue during the period covered under audit. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xx) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.

(xxi) During the course of our examination of the books and records of the Company carried out in accordance with the generally accepted auditing practices in India and according to the information and explanation given to us, we have neither come across any instance of fraud on or by the Company, noticed or reported during the year nor have we been informed of such case by the management.

For S.R.DINODIA & CO.

CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

Reg. No. 01478N

(SANDEEP DINODIA)

PLACE: NEW DELHI PARTNER

DATE: 10th May, 2010 M. NO. 83689