Home  »  Company  »  Kothari Ferment.  »  Quotes  »  Notes to Account
Enter the first few characters of Company and click 'Go'

Notes to Accounts of Kothari Fermentation & Biochem Ltd.

Mar 31, 2018

Notes to the financial statements for the year ended 31st March, 2018

1. Reporting Entity

Kothari Fermentation and Biochem Limited referred to as “the Company” is domiciled in India. The Company’s registered office is at 16, Community Centre, 1st Floor, Saket, New Delhi-110017. The Company is a manufacturer of Yeast and its derivatives. The Factory of the Company is situated at Village Rajarampur, Industrial Area Sikandrabed, Distt. Bulandshahr in the State of U.P.

These financial statements were authorised for issue by the Board of Directors on their meeting held on 23rd May, 2018.

a. Terms and rights attached to equity shares

Each holder of equity shares is entitled to one vote per share. In the event of liquidation of the company, the holders of equity shares will be entitled to receive remaining assets of the company. The distribution will be in proportion to the number of equity shares held by the shareholders. There is no restriction on distribution of dividend. However same other than interim dividend, is subject to the approval of the shareholders in the Annual General Meeting.

a. Securities

Loan outstanding at the end of current financial year of Rs. 496.59 (As at 31st March’ 2017 Rs. 343.13, as at 1st April’ 2016 Rs. 403.21) carrying interest @ 10.15 - 11.15% p.a. is repayable in monthly intallments as per the terms of sanction. The same is secured by an immovable property owned by one of the director and one of the promoters of the company and also secured by personal guarantee of two directors of the company. Loans taken for purchase/ installation of various plant & machineries and other fixtures, outstanding at the end of current financial year of Rs. 590.59 (As at 31st March’ 2017 Rs. 652.92, as at 1st April’ 2016 Rs. 351.22 ) carries interest @ 9.85% to 11.90% p.a. The same is repayable in monthly installments as per their terms of sanctions and secured by hypothecation of the respective plant and machineries and other fixtures required for its operations and carry a pari passu charge on stock and debtors which are also hypothecated for CC Limit.

@ The Company has recognised MAT Credit Entitlement. The Company has concluded that the deferred tax assets on MAT Credit Entitlement will be recoverable using the estimated future taxable income based on the approved business plans and budgets. The Company is expected to generate taxable income in near future. The MAT Credit Entitlement can be carried forward as per local tax regulations and the Company expects to recover the same in due course.

2 Segment Reporting

According to Ind AS 108, identification of operating segments is based on Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) approach for making decisions about allocating resources to the segment and assessing its performance. The business activity of the company falls within one broad business segment viz. “Yeast” and substantially sale of the product is within the country. The Gross income and profit from the other segment is below the norms prescribed in Ind AS 108. Hence, the disclosure requirement of Ind AS 108 of ‘Segment Reporting’ is not considered applicable.

3 Leases Operating lease

The Company’s significant leasing arrangements are in respect of operating leases of premises for offices and officers’ residence. These leasing arrangements, which are cancellable, are typically for a period of 11 months and are usually renewable on mutually agreeable terms. The Company has recognised expense amounting to Rs. 35.45 Lacs (Previous year Rs. 32.54 Lacs)

4 Borrowing Cost

During the year, company has capitalized borrowing cost amounting to Rs. 29.04 Lacs ( Previous year Rs.23.94 Lacs).The capitalized rate used to determine the amount of borrowing cost to be capitalized is weighted average interest rate applicable to the entities general borrowing including term loan and working capital during the year is ~ 9.99% ( Previous Year ~11.66%).

5 Employee benefits

The Company contributes to the following post-employment defined benefit plans in India.

(i) Defined Contribution Plans:

The Company makes contributions towards provident fund to a defined contribution retirement benefit plan for qualifying employees. Under the plan, the Company is required to contribute a specified percentage of payroll cost to the retirement benefit plan to fund the benefits. During the year the Company has contributed to Government Provident Fund Rs. 27.39 (Previous year Rs. 24.45).

(ii) Defined Benefit Plan:

The Company provides for gratuity for employees in India as per the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Employees who are in continuous service for a period of 5 years are eligible for gratuity. The amount of gratuity payable on retirement/termination is the employees last drawn basic salary per month computed proportionately for 15 days salary multiplied for the number of years of service. Gratuity liabilty is being contributed to the Group Gratuity-cum-life Assurance Cash Accumulation Policy administered by the LIC of India.

The most recent actuarial valuation of plan assets and the present value of the defined benefit obligation for gratuity were carried out as at 31 March 2018. The present value of the defined benefit obligations and the related current service cost and past service cost, were measured using the Projected Unit Credit Method.

A. Based on the actuarial valuation obtained in this respect, the following table sets out the status of the gratuity plan and the amounts recognised in the Company’s financial statements as at balance sheet date:

6 Related parties

In accordance with the requirements of Ind AS 24 “Related Party Disclosures”, name of the related party, related party relationship,transactions and outstanding balances including commitments where control exists and with whom transactions have taken place during reported periods, are as detail below:

B. Fair value hierarchy

This section explains the judgements and estimates made in determining the fair values of the financial instruments that are:

(a) recognised and measured at fair value and

(b) measured at amortised cost and for which fair values are disclosed in the financial statements.

To provide an indication about the reliability of the inputs used in determining fair value, the Company has classified its financial instruments into the three levels prescribed under the accounting standard. An explanation of each level follows underneath the table.

Level 1: Level 1 hierarchy includes financial instruments measured using quoted prices. This includes listed equity instruments, traded bonds and mutual funds that have quoted price. The fair value of all equity instruments (including bonds) which are traded in the stock exchanges is valued using the closing price as at the reporting period.

Level 2: The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market (for example, traded bonds, over-the counter derivatives) is determined using valuation techniques which maximise the use of observable market data and rely as little as possible on entity-specific estimates. If all significant inputs required to fair value an instrument are observable, the instrument is included in level 2.

Level 3: If one or more of the significant inputs is not based on observable market data, the instrument is included in level 3. This is the case for unlisted equity securities.

There are no transfers between level 1 and level 2 during the year

The carrying amounts of trade receivables, trade payables, capital creditors and cash and cash equivalents and other bank balances are considered to be the same as their fair values, due to their short-term nature.

The fair values for loans, security deposits were calculated based on cash flows discounted using a current lending rate. They are classified as level 3 fair values in the fair value hierarchy due to the inclusion of unobservable inputs including counterparty credit. The fair values of non-current borrowings are based on discounted cash flows using a current borrowing rate. They are classified as level 3 fair values in the fair value hierarchy due to the use of unobservable inputs, including own credit risk.

For financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value, the carrying amounts are equal to the fair values.

II. Financial risk management

The Company has exposure to the following risks arising from financial instruments:

- credit risk;

- liquidity risk; and

- market risk

i. Risk management framework

The Company’s board of directors has overall responsibility for the establishment and oversight of the Company’s risk management framework. The board of directors has established the processes to ensure that executive management controls risks through the mechanism of property defined framework.

The Company’s risk management policies are established to identify and analyse the risks faced by the Company, to set appropriate risk limits and controls and to monitor risks and adherence to limits. Risk management policies and systems are reviewed by the board annually to reflect changes in market conditions and the Company’s activities. The Company, through its training and management standards and procedures, aims to maintain a disciplined and constructive control environment in which all employees understand their roles and obligations.

The Company’s Audit Committee oversees compliance with the Company’s risk management policies and procedures, and reviews the adequacy of the risk management framework in relation to the risks faced by the Company. The Audit Committee is assisted in its oversight role by Internal Audit. Internal Audit undertakes both regular and ad hoc reviews of risk management controls and procedures, the results of which are reported to the Audit Committee.

ii. Credit risk

Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Company if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations, and arises principally from the Company’s receivables from customers and investments in debt securities. The carrying amount of financial assets represents the maximum credit exposure. The Company monitor credit risk very closely both in domestic and export market. The Management impact analysis shows credit risk and impact assessment as low.

Trade and other receivables

The Company’s exposure to credit risk is influenced mainly by the individual characteristics of each customer. However, management also considers the factors that may influence the credit risk of its customer base, including the default risk of the industry and country in which customers operate.

The Company Management has established a credit policy under which each new customer is analyzed individually for creditworthiness before the Company’s standard payment and delivery terms and conditions are offered. The Company’s review includes market check, industry feedback, past financials and external ratings, if they are available, and in some cases bank references. Sale limits are established for each customer and reviewed quarterly. Any sales exceeding those limits require approval from the Management of the Company.

More than 60 % of the Company’s customers have been transacting with the Company for over four years, and no impairment loss has been recognized against these customers. In monitoring customer credit risk, customers are reviewed according to their credit characteristics, including whether they are an individual or a legal entity, their geographic location, industry and existence of previous financial difficulties

The Company establishes an allowance for impairment that represents its expected credit losses in respect of trade and other receivables. The management uses a simplified approach for the purpose of computation of expected credit loss for trade receivables The Company’s exposure to credit risk is influenced mainly by the individual characteristics of each customer. However, management also considers the factors that may influence the credit risk of its customer base, including the default risk of the industry and country in which customers operate.

The carrying amount net of loss allowances of trade receivables is Rs. 536.54 (31 March 2017 - Rs. 529.10, 1 April 2016 - Rs. 454.84).

During the period, the Company has made no write-offs of trade receivables, it does not expect to receive future cash flows or recoveries from collection of cash flows previously written off. The Company management also pursue all legal option for recovery of dues wherever necessary based on its internal assessment

A default on a financial asset is when counterparty fails to make payments within 60 days when they fall due.

iii. Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will encounter difficulty in meeting the obligations associated with its financial liabilities that are settled by delivering cash or another financial asset. The Company’s approach to managing liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will have sufficient liquidity to meet its liabilities when they are fallen due, under both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring unacceptable losses or risking damage to the Company’s reputation

Prudent liquidity risk management implies maintaining sufficient cash and marketable securities and the availability of funding through an adequate amount of committed credit facilities to meet obligations when due and to close out market positions. Due to the dynamic nature of the underlying businesses, Company treasury maintains flexibility in funding by maintaining availability under committed credit lines.

Management monitors rolling forecasts of the Company’s liquidity position (comprising the undrawn borrowing facilities) and cash and cash equivalents on the basis of expected future cash flows. This is generally carried out at unit level and monitored through caproate office of the Company in accordance with practice and limits set by the Company. These limits vary by location to take into account requirement, future cash flow and the liquidity in which the entity operates. In addition, the Company’s liquidity management strategy involves projecting cash flows in major currencies and considering the level of liquid assets necessary to meet these, monitoring balance sheet liquidity ratios against internal and external regulatory requirements and maintaining debt financing plans.

The bank overdraft facilities may be drawn at any time and may be terminated by the bank without notice. Subject to the continuance of satisfactory credit ratings, the bank loan facilities may be drawn at any time in indian rupee and have an average maturity within a year.

The inflows/(outflows) disclosed in the above table represent the contractual undiscounted cash flows relating to derivative financial liabilities held for risk management purposes and which are not usually closed out before contractual maturity. The interest payments on variable interest rate loans in the table above reflect market forward interest rates at the reporting date and these amounts may change as market interest rates change.

iv. Market risk

Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices - such as foreign exchange rates and interest rates - will affect the Company’s income or the value of its holdings of financial instruments. The objective of market risk management is to manage and control market risk exposures within acceptable parameters, while optimizing the return.

The Company uses derivatives like forward contracts to manage market riskson account of foreign exchange and various debt instruments on account of interest rates. All such transactions are carried out within the guidelines set by the Board of Directors.

v. Currency risk

The Company has no foreign currency exposure.

Interest rate risk

The Company’s main interest rate risk arises from long-term borrowings with variable rates, which expose the Company to cash flow interest rate risk. During 31st March, 2018 and 31st March, 2017, the Company’s borrowings at variable rate were denominated in Indian Rupees.

Currently the Company’s borrowings are within acceptable risk levels, as determined by the management, hence the Company has not taken any swaps to hedge the interest rate risk.

Cash flow sensitivity analysis for variable-rate instruments

A reasonably possible change of 50 basis points in interest rates at the reporting date would have increased (decreased) equity and profit or loss by the amounts shown below. This analysis assumes that all other variables, in particular foreign currency exchange rates, remain constant.

Fair value sensitivity analysis for fixed-rate instruments

The Company does not account for any fixed-rate financial assets or financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss. Therefore, a change in interest rates at the reporting date would not affect profit or loss.

7 First Time Adoption of Ind AS

As stated in note 2, these are the Company’s first financial statements prepared in accordance with Ind AS.

The accounting policies set out in note 2 have been applied in preparing the financial statements for the year ended 31st March, 2018, the comparative information presented in these financial statements for the year ended 31st March, 2017 and in the preparation of an opening Ind AS statement of financial position at 1st April, 2016 (the Company’s date of transition). In preparing its opening Ind AS statement of financial position, the Company has adjusted amounts reported previously in financial statements prepared in accordance with Indian GAAP (previous GAAP). An explanation of how the transition from previous GAAP to Ind AS has affected the Company’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows is set out in the following tables and the notes that accompany the tables.

Exemptions and exceptions availed set out below are the applicable Ind AS 101 optional exemptions and mandatory exceptions applied in the transition from previous GAAP to Ind AS.

A. Ind AS optional exemptions

(i) Deemed cost

Ind AS 101 permits a first-time adopter to elect to continue with the carrying value for all of its property, plant and equipment as recognised in the financial statements as at the date of transition to Ind AS, measured as per the previous GAAP and use that as its deemed cost as at the date of transition after making necessary adjustments for de-commissioning liabilities. This exemption can also be used for intangible assets covered by Ind AS 38 Intangible Assets.

Accordingly, the Company has elected to measure all of its property, plant and equipment and intangible assets at their previous GAAP carrying value.

(ii) Leases

Appendix C to Ind AS 17 requires an entity to assess whether a contract or arrangement contains a lease. In accordance with Ind AS 17, this assessment should be carried out at the inception of the contract or arrangement. Ind AS 101 provides an option to make this assessment on the basis of facts and circumstances existing at the date of transition to Ind AS, except where the effect is expected to be not material. The Company has elected to apply this exemption for such contracts/ arrangements.

B. Ind AS mandatory exceptions

(i) Estimates

An entity’s estimates in accordance with Ind AS at the date of transition to Ind AS shall be consistent with estimates made for the same date in accordance with previous GAAP (after adjustments to reflect any difference in accounting policies), unless there is objective evidence that those estimates were in error.

Ind AS estimates as at 1st April, 2016 are consistent with the estimates as at the same date made in conformity with previous GAAP. The Company made estimates for Impairment of financial assets based on expected credit loss model in accordance with Ind AS at the date of transition as these were not required under previous GAAP

(ii) Classification and measurement of financial assets Ind AS 101 requires an entity to assess classification and measurement of financial assets on the basis of the facts and circumstances that exist at the date of transition to Ind AS.

C. Reconciliations between previous GAAP and Ind AS

Ind AS 101 requires an entity to reconcile equity, total comprehensive income and cash flows for prior periods. The following tables represent the reconciliations from previous GAAP to Ind AS.

Reconciliation of equity

D. Notes to first-time adoption:

1'' Borrowings

Ind AS 109 requires transaction costs incurred towards origination of borrowings to be deducted from the carrying amount of borrowings on initial recognition. These costs are recognised in the profit or loss over the tenure of the borrowing as part of the interest expense by applying the effective interest rate method.

2'' Remeasurements of post-employment benefit obligations

Under Ind AS, remeasurements i.e. actuarial gains and losses and the return on plan assets, excluding amounts included in the net interest expense on the net defined benefit liability are recognised in other comprehensive income instead of statement of profit and loss. Under the previous GAAP, these remeasurements were forming part of the statement of profit and loss for the year. As a result of this change, the profit for the year ended March 31, 2017 increased by Rs. 9.84 (Net of Tax Rs. 6.58) There is no impact on the total equity as at 31st March, 2017. 3'' Deferred Tax

Under previous GAAP, deferred tax was prepared using income statement approach. Under Ind AS, company has prepared deferred tax using balance sheet approach. Also, deferred tax have been recognised on the adjustments made on transition to Ind AS.

4'' Retained earnings

Retained earnings as at April 1, 2016 has been adjusted consequent to the above Ind AS transition adjustments 5'' Other comprehensive income

Under Ind AS, all items of income and expense recognised in a period should be included in the statement of profit and loss for the period, unless a standard requires or permits otherwise. Items of income and expense that are not recognised in profit or loss but are shown in the statement of profit and loss as ‘other comprehensive income’ includes remeasurements of defined benefit plans and tax thereon. The concept of other comprehensive income did not exist under previous GAAP

8 Balances of certain trade receivables, advances, trade payables and other liabilities are in the process of confirmation and/or reconciliation.

9 Segment Reporting

According to Ind AS 108, identification of operating segments is based on Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) approach for making decisions about allocating resources to the segment and assessing its performance. The business activity of the company falls within one broad business segment viz. “Yeast” and substantially sale of the product is within the country. The Gross income and profit from the other segment is below the norms prescribed in Ind AS 108. Hence, the disclosure requirement of Ind AS 108 of ‘Segment Reporting’ is not considered applicable.

10 Capital management

The Company’s policy is to maintain a strong capital base so as to maintain investor, creditor and market confidence and to sustain future development of the business. Management monitors the return on capital as well as the level of dividends to ordinary shareholders. The following table summarises the capital of the Company :


Mar 31, 2016

1 Term loan from bank includes various loans taken from Punjab National Bank as under

a Loan outstanding at the end of current financial year of Rs.403.21 lacs carrying interest @ 11.50% p.a. is repayable in monthly installment as per the terms of sanction. The same is secured by an immovable property owned by one of the director and one of the promoters of the company and also secured by personal guarantee of two directors of the company. b Loans, taken for purchases / installation of various plant & machineries and other fixtures, outstanding at the end of current financial year of Rs.351.22 carries interest @ 11.50% -11.75% p.a. The same are repayable in monthly installments as per their terms of sanctions and secured by the hypothecation of the respective plant & machineries and other fixtures required for its operation and carry a pari passu charge on stock and debtors which are also hypothecated for CC Limit.

2 Vehicle loans are secured against hypothecation of motor vehicles purchased there under which are repayable in monthly installments as per terms of sanction.

7.1 Cash Credit facilities from banks together with interest and other charges thereon are secured by way of hypothecation of stock (raw material , stock in process, semi finished and finished goods) and book debts The same is also secured by equitable mortgage on the immovable properties of the Company situated at Village Rajarampur Industrial Area, Sikandrabad, Bulandshahar (U.P.) and by way of hypothecation charge over all moveable assets forming part of fixed/block of assets of the company. The facility is also guaranteed by the directors of the Company. The same are repayable on demand and carries interest @ BR 2.25%-0.75% on monthly rest.

3. (I) Contingent Liabilities not provided for (As certified by the Management)

(a) Claims against the company towards listing fee for a stock exchange not acknowledged as debt is Rs.1.36 Lacs (Previous Year Rs. 1.36 Lacs) as company has sought delisting from the concerned stock exchange.

(b) Demand of Income Tax amounting to Rs.665.81 lacs (Previous Year Rs. Nil) under Income Tax Act disputed in Appeal.

(c) Outstanding Bank Guarantees for Rs. 106.95 lacs (Previous Year Rs.90.69 lacs)

(ii) Capital Commitments: (rs In Lakhs)

4. Amount recoverable from Statutory Authorities shown under schedule “Short Term Loans & Advances” of the balance sheet includes a sum of Rs.46,13,849/- for which the company filed a claim before the trade tax authorities during the F.Y.2009-10 for refund of Trade Tax paid on purchases and stock transfer in respect of Molasses for the earlier years in view of the decision of the Hon''ble Allahabad High Court in the case of M/s. SAF Yeast Company Private Limited vs. State of U.P. and Another. Further, against the Special Leave Petition (SLP) preferred by the State of U.P. in this matter, Hon''ble Supreme Court has stayed the payment of refund till final hearing of the matter and the SLP is still pending before the Court.

5. The Company has not received any information from suppliers or service providers, whether they are covered under the “Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (Development) Act, 2006”. Therefore, it is not possible to give the information required under the Act.

6. In the opinion of the Board, the Current Assets, Loans and Advances including Sundry Debtors are of the value as stated in financial statement in the ordinary course of business, although, some of them are outstanding for a long period. The provision of all known liabilities has been made. The accounts of certain debtors, creditors, other liabilities and advances are subject to confirmation and reconciliation.

7. The arbitration cases relating to supply of rice to Govt. of Bangladesh during 1995-96 pending in Bangladesh have been awarded in favour of company allowing the claim of USD 427,021.89 against Govt. of Bangladesh. The arbitration awards has been made rule of law by the Bangladesh Courts. The appeal before the Hon''ble Supreme Court of Bangladesh filed by the Govt. of Bangladesh has been dismissed by the Hon''ble Court on 13th February, 2014. Any claims/amount receivable in this matter to the company from the Govt. of Bangladesh will be recognized in the books of accounts of the company on receiving of the same.

8. As the Company''s business activity falls within a single primary business segment viz. “Manufacturing of Yeast” and there is no reportable secondary segment i.e. geographical segment, the disclosure requirement of Accounting Standard-17 “Segmental Reporting” as notified by the Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2006 (as amended) is not applicable.

9. The company has given loans covered u/s 186(4) of the Companies Act, 2013 to a party M/s. Glocom Impex Private Limited of Rs.36.07 Lacs during the year (Previous year - Rs.217.90 Lacs) as temporary advances. The balance outstanding of the above-said advance as on 31.03.2016 is Rs.15.70 Lacs (Previous year - Rs.197.42 Lacs). Interest charged on this advance is @ 12% p.a. higher than the prevailing yield rates of Government Securities as prescribed u/s 186(7) of the Act.

10. Defined Benefit Plan:

The employees'' gratuity fund scheme of the Company managed by Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) is a defined benefit plan. The present value of obligation is determined based on actuarial valuation using the Projected Unit Credit Method, which recognized each period of service as giving rise to additional unit of employee benefit entitlement and measures each unit separately to build up the final obligation.

11. Related Party Disclosures :

Related party disclosures as required by AS-18”Related party disclosures” are given below

Key Management Personnel & their relatives -Mr. Pramod Kothari Managing Director

-Mrs. Kavita Kothari Whole-Time Director

-Ms. Khushboo Kothari Executive Director (Tech.)

-Mr. Siddhant Kothari Executive Director (Tech.)

- Mrs. Isha Gupta Company Secretary

- Mr. Arun Kumar Sekhani Chief Financial Officer Note: 1) Mrs. Kavita Kothari is wife of Mr. Pramod Kothari.

2) Ms. Kushboo Kothari is daughter of Mr. Pramod Kothari.

3) Mr. Siddhant Kothari is son of Mr. Pramod Kothari.

Entities over which company or managerial personnel or their relative exercise significant influence -Chaudhry Bros. Traders and Builders Pvt. Ltd.


Mar 31, 2015

A) CORPORATE INFORMATION

Kothari Fermentation and Biochem Limited ("The Company") is a public limited company incorporated in 1990 under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. The Company is engaged in the business of manufacturing of Yeast and its derivatives.

The equity shares of the Company are presently listed on Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE). The Company is headquartered at New Delhi and the works of the Company is situated at Village Rajarampur, Industrial Area Sikandrabad, Distt. Bulandshahr in the State of U.P.

2.1 Term Loan of Rs.65.00 lacs taken from Punjab National Bank during the current financial year carries interest @ 11.75% p.a. and repayable in 35 monthly installment from the due date of repayment viz. Dec. 2014. The aforesaid loans are secured by hypothecation of a Machinery and other fixtures required for its operation (i.e. German Separator Machine) and security hypothecated for CC limit i.e. stock and book debts.

2.2 Term Loan of Rs.452.00 lacs taken from Religare Finvest Limited during the financial year 2010-11 has been repaid during the current financial year.

2.3 Term Loan of Rs.497.00 lacs taken from TATA Capital Financial Services Limited during the current financial year carries interest @ 12.00% p.a., repayable in 84 monthly installment from the due date of repayment viz. 9th June 2014.

The aforesaid loans are secured by immovable property belonging to a director and one of the promoters of the company and guaranteed by the other promoters.

2.4 Vehicle loans are secured against hypothecation of motor vehicles purchased thereunder which are repayable on different dates.

3.1 Cash Credit facilities from banks together with interest and other charges thereon are secured by way of hypothecation of stock (raw material , stock in process, semi finished and finished goods) and book debts The same is aslo secured by equitable mortgage on the immova ble properties of the Company situated at Village Rajarampur Industrial Area, Sikandrabad, Bulandshahar (U.P.) and by way of hypothecation charge ove r all moveable assets forming part of fixed/block of assets of the company. The facility is also guaranteed by the directors of the Company. The same are repayable on demand and carries interest @ BR 2.25%-0.75% on monthly rest.

4. Pursuant to the enactment of Companies Act, 2013, the Company has applied the estimated useful lives as specified in Schedule II, except in respect of certain assets as disclosed in Accounting Policy on Depreciation, Amortisation and Depletion. Accordingly the unamortised carrying value is being depreciated/ amortised over the revised/ remaining useful lives. The written down value of fixed assets whose live; have expired as at 1st April 2014 have been adjusted net of deferred tax, in the opening balance of Profit and Loss Account amounting to Rs.6.75 lacs.

5. (i) Contingent Liabilities not provided for (As certified by the Management):

(a) Claims against the company towards listing fee for one (Previous Year two) stock exchange not acknowledged as debt is Rs.1.36 Lacs (Previous Year Rs. 3.29 Lacs) as company has sought delisting from the concerned stock exchanges.

(b) Outstanding Bank Guarantees for Rs.90.69 lacs (Previous Year Rs.43.42 lacs)

(ii) Capital Commitments

Estimated amount of contracts remaining to be executed on capital account and not provided for:

(Rs. In Lakhs) 2014-15 2013-14

Fixed Assets ( net of advances ): 197.31 63.12

6. Amount recoverable from Statutory Authorities shown under schedule "Short Term Loans & Advances" of the balance sheet includes a sum of Rs.46,13,849/- for which the company filed a claim before the trade tax authorities during the F.Y.2009-10 for refund of Trade Tax paid on purchases and stock transfer in respect of Molasses for the earlier years in view of the decision of the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of M/s. SAF Yeast Company Private Limited vs. State of U.P. and Another. Further, against the Special Leave Petition (SLP) preferred by the State of U.P. in this matter, Hon'ble Supreme Court has stayed the payment of refund till final hearing of the matter and the SLP is still pending before the Court.

7. The Company has not received any information from suppliers or service providers, whether they are covered under the "Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (Development) Act, 2006". Therefore, it is not possible to give the information required under the Act.

8. In the opinion of the Board, the Current Assets, Loans and Advances including Sundry Debtors are of the value as stated in financial statement in the ordinary course of business. The provision of all known liabilities has been made. The accounts of certain debtors, creditors, other liabilities and advances are subject to confirmation and reconciliation.

9. The arbitration cases relating to supply of rice to Govt. of Bangladesh during 1995-96 pending in Bangladesh have been awarded in favour of company allowing the claim of USD 427,021.89 against Govt. of Bangladesh. The arbitration awards has been made rule of law by the Bangladesh Courts. The appeal before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Bangladesh filed by the Govt. of Bangladesh has been dismissed by the Hon'ble Court on 13th February, 2014. Any claims/amount receivable in this matter to the company from the Govt. of Bangladesh will be recognized in the books of accounts of the company on receiving of the same.

10. As the Company's business activity falls within a single primary business segment viz. "Manufacturing of Yeast" and there is no reportable secondary segment i.e. geographical segment, the disclosure requirement of Accounting Standard-17 "Segmental Reporting" as notified by the Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2006 (as amended) is not applicable.

11. Defined Benefit Plan:

The employees' gratuity fund scheme of the Company managed by Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) is a defined benefit plan. The present value of obligation is determined based on actuarial valuation using the Projected Unit Credit Method, which recognized each period of service as giving rise to additional unit of employee benefit entitlement and measures each unit separately to build up the final obligation.

12. Previous year's figures have been re-grouped/reclassified wherever necessary, to make them comparable


Mar 31, 2013

1. Contingent Liabilities not provided for (As certified by the Management)

(a) Claims against the company towards listing fee for three stock exchanges not acknowledged as debt is Rs. 4.80 Lacs (Previous Year Rs. 4.59 Lacs) as company has sought delisting from these stock exchanges.

(b) Outstanding Bank Guarantees for Rs.15.55 lacs (Previous Year Rs.31.03 lacs)

(c) Demand of excise duty amounting to Rs. 2.52 Lacs (Previous Year Rs. 2.52 Lacs) due to non- allowability of certain expenses by the department. Against the appeal of the company, the Custom, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) remanded the matter to original adjudicating authority to decide the said issue and the matter is pending before the appropriate authority.

2. Amount recoverable from Statutory Authorities shown under schedule "Short Term Loans & Advances" of the balance sheet includes a sum of Rs.46,13,849/- for which the company filed a claim before the trade tax authorities during the F.Y.2009-10 for refund of Trade Tax paid on purchases and stock transfer in respect of Molasses for the earlier years in view of the decision of the Hon''ble Allahabad High Court in the case of M/s. SAF Yeast Company Private Limited vs. State of U.P. and Another. Further, against the Special Leave Petition (SLP) preferred by the State of U.P. in this matter, Hon''ble Supreme Court has stayed the payment of refund till final hearing of the matter and the SLP is still pending before the Court.

3. The Company has not received any information from suppliers or service providers, whether they are covered under the "Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (Development) Act, 2006". Therefore, it is not possible to give the information required under the Act.

4. In the opinion of the Board, the Current Assets, Loans and Advances including Sundry Debtors are of the value as stated in financial statement in the ordinary course of business, although, some of them are outstanding for a long period. The provision of all known liabilities has been made. The accounts of certain debtors, creditors, other liabilities and advances are subject to confirmation and reconciliation.

5. The arbitration cases relating to supply of rice to Govt. of Bangladesh during 1995-96 pending in Bangladesh have been awarded in favour of company allowing our claims of USD 427,021.89 against Govt. of Bangladesh. The arbitration awards have been filed with the appropriate court in Bangladesh and the Court has made the award as rule of law. In this matter the appeal filed by the Govt. of Bangladesh before the hon''ble High Court at Bangladesh has been dismissed in July, 2012. However, the Govt. of Bangladesh preferred an appeal before the Hon''ble Supreme Court of Bangladesh, which is pending yet before the Court.

6. As the Company''s business activity falls within a single primary business segment viz. "Manufacturing of Yeast" and there is no reportable secondary segment i.e. geographical segment, the disclosure requirement of Accounting Standard-17 "Segmental Reporting" as notified by the Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2006 (as amended) is not applicable.

7. a) Provision for tax under Income Tax Act, 1961 has not been made in view of the adjustable brought forwarded accumulated losses/unabsorbed depreciation.

b) No provision for minimum alternative tax (MAT) on book profit has been made in the accounts in light of the direction of Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) in the sanctioned scheme and the matter is under consideration with the appropriate authority.

8. Defined Benefit Plan:

The employees'' gratuity fund scheme of the Company managed by Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) is a defined benefit plan. The present value of obligation is determined based on actuarial valuation using the Projected Unit Credit Method, which recognized each period of service as giving rise to additional unit of employee benefit entitlement and measures each unit separately to built up the final obligation.

9. Related Party Disclosures (AS- 18):

Related party disclosures as required by AS-18 are given below

(a) Key Managerial Personnel & their Relatives

(i) Mr. Moti Lal Kothari Managing Director

(ii) Mr. Pramod Kothari Managing Director

Note: 1. Mr. Pramod Kothari is the son of Mr. Moti Lal Kothari. 2. Mr. Moti Lal Kothari deceased on 03.09.2012.

Entities over which company or managerial personnel or their relatives exercise significant influence

- Chaudhry Bros.Traders and Builders Pvt. Ltd.

- Kothari Thermoplast Pvt. Ltd.

10. Previous year''s figures have been re-grouped/reclassified wherever necessary, to make them comparable


Mar 31, 2012

1. Contingent Liabilities not provided for (As certified by the Management)

(a) Claims against the company towards listing fee for three stock exchanges not acknowledged as debt is Rs. 3.63 Lacs (Previous Year Rs. 3.11 Lacs) as company has sought delisting from these stock exchanges.

(b)Outstanding Bank Guarantees for Rs.31.03 lacs (Previous Year Nil)

(c) The company has filed an appeal before The Custom, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in the matter of excise duty involving disputed amount of Rs. 2.52 Lacs (Previous Year Rs. 2.52 Lacs). The case is in progress and the company is likely to succeed. The matter being sub-judice, no provision has been made in the books of accounts.

(d) Demand of entry tax amounting to Rs.4.36 Lacs (Previous Year Rs. 4.36 Lacs) under U. P. VAT Act disputed in Appeal. However, the same has been deposited with department under protest.

2. Amount recoverable from Statutory Authorities shown under schedule "Short Term Loans & Advances" of the balance sheet includes a sum of Rs.46,13,849/- for which the company filed a claim before the trade tax authorities during the F.Y.2009-10 for refund of Trade Ta x paid on purchases and stock transfer in respect of Molasses for the earlier years in view of the decision of the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of M/s. SAF Yeast Company Private Limited vs. State of U.P. and Another. The claim of the company before the appropriate authorities is still pending.

3. The Company has not received any information from suppliers or service providers, whether they are covered under the "Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (Development) Act, 2006". Therefore, it is not possible to give the information re- quired under the Act.

4. In the opinion of the Board, the Current Assets, Loans and Advances including Sundry Debtors are of the value as stated in financial statement in the ordinary course of business, although, some of them are outstanding for a long period. The provision of all known liabilities has been made. The accounts of certain debtors, creditors, other liabilities and advances are subject to confirmation and reconciliation.

5.The arbitration cases relating to supply of rice to Govt. of Bangladesh during 1995-96 pending in Bangladesh have been awarded in favour of company allowing our claims of USD 427,021.89 against Govt. of Bangladesh. The arbitration awards have been filed with the appropriate court in Bangladesh and the Court has made the award as rule of law. However, the Govt. of Bangladesh filed an appeal against the same before the Hon'ble High Court at Bangladesh, which is pending yet.

6. As the Company's business activity falls within a single primary business segment viz. "Manufacturing of Yeast" and there is no reportable secondary segment i.e. geographical segment, the disclosure requirement of Accounting Standard-17 "Seg- mental Reporting" as notified by the Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2006 (as amended) is not applicable.

7.a) Provision for tax under Income Tax Act, 1961 has not been made in view of the adjustable brought forwarded accumu- lated losses/unabsorbed depreciation.

b) No provision for minimum alternative tax (MAT) on book profit has been made in the accounts in light of the direction to the appropriate authority by order of Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) as "To consider to grant exemption from the levy of MAT under section 115JB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for a period upto 31.03.08 or till the accumulated losses are wiped out as per Income Tax Act, 1961, whichever is later". The matter is yet to be confirmed for exemption by the appropriate authority.


Mar 31, 2011

1. CONTINGENT LIABILITIES :

(a) Claims against the company towards listing fee for three stock exchanges not acknowledged as debt is Rs. 3.11 Lacs (Previous Year Rs. 2.91 Lacs) as company has sought delisting from these stock exchanges.

(b) The company has filed an appeal before The Custom, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in the matter of excise duty involving disputed amount of Rs. 2.52 Lacs. The case is in progress and the company is likely to succeed. The matter being sub-judice, no provision has been made in the books of accounts.

(c) Demand of entry tax amounting to Rs.4.36 Lacs under U P VAT Act disputed in Appeal. How ever the same has been deposited with department under protest.

(d) Demand of service tax amounting to Rs.5.34 Lacs and demand of penalty amounting to Rs.5.34 Lacs under section 76 of Finance Act, 1994 for service tax disputed in Appeal.

2. Secured Loan

i) Working capital loan from Punjab National Bank is secured by way of hypothecation of inventories and book debts, equitable mortgage of factory land and building, first charge on block of assets of the company for plant & machinery and Effluent Treatment Plant and all so personally guaranteed by the directors of the company.

ii) Loan from Religare Finvest Limited is secured by immovable property situated at C-4A and 4B, N-122, Panchsheel Park, New Delhi belonging to the relatives of directors of the Company and also guaranteed by the Directors of the company and their Associate concern.

iii) Vehicle loans are secured against respective vehicles.

3. In the opinion of the Board, the Current Assets, Loans and Advances including Sundry Debtors are of the value as stated in financial statement in the ordinary course of business, although, some of them are outstanding for a long period. The provision of all known liabilities has been made. The accounts of certain Sundry Debtors, Creditors, banks and loans & Advances are subject to confirmation and reconciliation.

4. Balance with taxation departments shown under schedule "Loans & Advances" of the balance sheet includes a sum of Rs. 46,13,849/- for which the company filed a claim before the trade tax authorities during the F.Y.2009-10 for refund of Trade Tax paid on purchases and stock transfer in respect of Molasses for the earlier years in view of the decision of the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of M/s. SAF Yeast Company Private Limited vs. State of U.P. and Another. The claim of the company before the appropriate authorities is still pending.

5. In view of the order of Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) and brought forwarded accumulated losses/unabsorbed depreciation, no provision for income tax/ MAT for the year has been made in the accounts.

6. In view of the accumulated business losses & unabsorbed depreciation and since there is no reasonable certainty of realization, the company has not recognized the deferred tax liability/asset arising on account of timing difference as stipulated in Accounting Standard (AS-22), "Accounting for taxes of Income" issued by the Institute of Chartered Accoun- tants of India by way of prudence.

7. The Company has not received any information from suppliers or service providers, whether they are covered under the "Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (Development) Act, 2006". Therefore, it is not possible to give the information required under the Act.

8. Managerial Remuneration under Section 198 of the Companies Act, 1956:

i) Remuneration to Mr. M L Kothari (Managing Director): Rs.2,70,000/- (Previous year Rs. 2,15,000/-) ii) Remuneration to Mr. Pramod Kothari (Managing Director): Rs.3,30,000/- (Previous year Rs. 2,25,000/-)

9. The arbitration cases relating to supply of rice to Govt. of Bangladesh during 1995-96 pending in Bangladesh have been awarded in favour of company allowing our claims of USD 427,021.89 against Govt. of Bangladesh. The arbitration awards have been filed with the appropriate court in Bangladesh and the Court has made the award as rule of law. However, the Govt. of Bangladesh filed an appeal against the same before the Hon'ble High Court at Bangladesh, which is pending yet.

10. RELATED PARTY DISCLOSURE (AS- 18) (a) Key Personnel & Relatives

(i) Mr. Moti Lal Kothari Chairman & Managing Director

(ii) Mr. Pramod Kothari Managing Director

Note: Mr. Pramod Kothari is the son of Mr. Moti Lal Kothari.

(c) There is no amount written off or written back in respect of debts due from or to related parties.

Note:

(i) The amount of loan/advances received and given have been paid and received back in full during the year itself.

(ii) Related party relationship is as identified by the management and relied upon by the Auditors.

11. Previous year's figures have been re-grouped/reclassified wherever necessary, to make them comparable.

12. Schedule A to M form integral part of the Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss Account.


Mar 31, 2010

1. CONTINGENT LIABILITIES:

(a) Claims against the company towards listing fee for three stock exchanges not acknowledged as debt is Rs. 2.91 Lacs (Previous Year Rs. 2.71 Lacs) as company has sought delisting from these stock exchanges.

(b) The company has filed an appeal before The Custom, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in the matter of excise duty involving disputed amount of Rs. 2.52 Lacs. The case is in progress and the company is likely to succeed. The matter being sub-judice, no provision has been made in the books of accounts. (c) Demand of entry tax amounting to Rs.4.36 Lacs and demand of penalty amounting to Rs.1.28 Lacs for incomplete entries in statutory form under U P VAT Act disputed in Appeal.

2. In the opinion of the Board, the Current Assets, Loans and Advances including Sundry Debtors are of the value as stated in financial statement in the ordinary course of business, although, some of them are outstanding for a long period. The provision of all known liabilities has been made. The accounts of certain Sundry Debtors, Creditors and Loans & Advances are subject to confirmation and reconciliation.

3. In view of the order of Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) and brought forwarded accumulated losses/ unabsorbed depreciation, no provision for income tax/ MAT for the year has been made in the accounts.

4. In view of the accumulated business losses & unabsorbed depreciation and since there is no reasonable certainty of realization, the company has not recognized the deferred tax liability/asset arising on account of timing difference as stipulated in Accounting Standard (AS-22), "Accounting for taxes of Income" issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India by way of prudence.

5. The Company has not received any information from suppliers or service providers, whether they are covered under the "Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (Development) Act, 2006". Therefore, it is not possible to give the information required under the Act.

6. Managerial Remuneration under Section 198 of the Companies Act, 1956:

i) Remuneration to Mr. M L Kothari (Managing Director): Rs.2,15,000/- (Previous year Rs.1,80,000/-) ii) Remuneration to Mr. Pramod Kothari (Managing Director): Rs.2,25,000/- (Previous year Rs.1,20,000/-)

7. The arbitration cases relating to supply of rice to Govt. of Bangladesh during 1995-96 pending in Bangladesh have been awarded in favour of company allowing our claims of USD 427,021.89 against Govt. of Bangladesh. The arbitration awards have been filed with the appropriate court in Bangladesh and the Court has made the award as rule of law. However, the Govt. of Bangladesh filed an appeal against the same before the Honble High Court at Bangladesh, which is pending yet.

8. Previous years figures have been re-grouped/reclassified wherever necessary, to make them comparable.

9. Schedule A to M form integral part of the Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss Account.

Get Instant News Updates
Enable
x
Notification Settings X
Time Settings
Done
Clear Notification X
Do you want to clear all the notifications from your inbox?
Settings X