Mar 31, 2018
Report on the Ind AS financial statements
We have audited the accompanying Ind AS financial statements of MIRC Electronics Limited ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at March 31, 2018, the Statement of Profit and Loss, including the statement of Other Comprehensive Income, the Cash Flow Statement and the changes in Equity for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Management''s Responsibility for the Ind AS financial statements
The Company''s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act") with respect to the preparation of these Ind AS financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance including other comprehensive income, cash flows and changes in equity of the Company in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) specified under section 133 of the Act, read with the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015, as amended. This responsibility includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding of the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and the design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial control that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the Ind AS financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditor''s Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these Ind AS financial statements based on our audit. We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made thereunder. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, as specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the Ind AS financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the Ind AS financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the Ind AS financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant to the Company''s preparation of the Ind AS financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Company''s Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the Ind AS financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the Ind AS financial statements.
Opinion
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the Ind AS financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31, 2018, its profit and its cash flows and the changes in equity for the year ended on that date.
Emphasis of Matter
We draw attention to note 35 to the financial statement which describes recognition of preference shares and de-recognition of outstanding receivables consequent to the scheme of the arrangement filed by one of the party and approved by NCLT vide its order dated August 24, 2017. As per the terms of the scheme, certain preference shares are allotted to the Company with effect from December 01, 2016. Consequent to the said allotment loss of Rs. 1,507 lakhs, arising on account of difference between the fair valuation of preference shares on December 01, 2016 and the carrying value of outstanding receivables as on that date, is recognized and disclosed as an ''Exceptional Item'' in comparative figures for the year ended March 31, 2017. Our opinion is not qualified in respect of this matter.
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s report) Order, 2016 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (11) of section 143 of the Act, we give in Annexure 1 a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.
2. As required by section 143 (3) of the Act, we report that:
(a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;
(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books;
(c) The Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss including the Statement of Other Comprehensive Income, the Cash Flow Statement and Statement of Changes in Equity dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account;
(d) In our opinion, the aforesaid Ind AS financial statements comply with the Accounting Standards specified under section 133 of the Act, read with the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015, as amended;
(e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors as on March 31, 2018, and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2018, from being appointed as a director in terms of section 164 (2) of the Act;
(f) With respect to the adequacy of the internal financial controls over financial reporting of the Company with reference to these Ind AS financial statements and the operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to our separate Report in Annexure 2 to this report;
(g) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor''s Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:
i. The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position in its Ind AS financial statements - Refer Note 39 to the Ind AS financial statements.
ii. The Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses.
iii. There has been no delay in transferring amounts, required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.
Annexure referred to in paragraph 1 under the heading ''Report on other Legal and Regulatory Requirements'' of ourreport of even date
Re: MIRC Electronics Limited (the "Company")
(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.
(b) All fixed assets were physically verified by the management in the previous year in accordance with a planned programme of verifying them once in three years which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.
(c) According to the information and explanations given by the management, the title deeds of immovable properties included in property, plant and equipment are held in the name of the company.
(ii) The inventory has been physically verified by the management during the year. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is reasonable. No material discrepancies were noticed on such physical verification.
(iii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to companies, firms, Limited Liability Partnerships or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 3(iii) (a), (b) and (c) of the Order are not applicable to the Company and hence not commented upon.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there are no loans, investments, guarantees, and securities given in respect of which provisions of section 185 and 186 of the Companies Act 2013 are applicable and hence not commented upon.
(v) The Company has not accepted any deposits within the meaning of Sections 73 to 76 of the Act and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014 (as amended). Accordingly, the provisions of clause 3(v) of the Order are not applicable.
(vi) We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the Company pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under section 148(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, related to the manufacture or service of consumer appliances, and are of the opinion that prima facie, the specified accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have not, however, made a detailed examination of the same.
(vii) (a) Undisputed statutory dues including sales tax, duty of custom, duty of excise, service tax and other material statutory dues have been regularly deposited with the appropriate authorities except income-tax, provident fund, goods and service tax, employees state insurance, profession tax, labour welfare fund where there have been delays in few cases, which are, however, not serious.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, undisputed dues in respect of provident fund and other statutory dues which were outstanding, at the year-end for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable are as follows:
Name of the statute |
Nature of the dues |
Amount (Rs. in Lacs) |
Period to which the amount relates |
Due Date |
Date of Payment |
The Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 |
Provident Fund |
0.17 |
Aug-17 |
September 15, 2017 |
Not paid |
(c) According to the records of the Company, the dues outstanding of income tax, sales tax, service tax, duty of excise, duty of customs, on account of any dispute, are as follows:
Nature of Dues |
Forum |
Years pertains to* |
Amount of dispute in Rs. in Lacs) |
Income Tax |
ITAT |
2010-2013 |
448.37 |
CIT(A) |
2016 |
494.16 |
|
High Court |
2001-2008,2011 |
1432.45 |
|
Service Tax |
CESTAT |
2005-2015 |
6188.10 |
Commissioner (Appeals) |
2007-2016 |
99.65 |
|
Excise Duty |
HIGH COURT |
1999 |
10.00 |
CESTAT |
2000, 2001-2005, 2007-2012 |
194.35 |
|
Customs Duty |
CESTAT |
2013 |
174.18 |
Commissioner of Customs |
2013,2014 |
50.88 |
|
Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) |
2016 |
0.10 |
|
Deputy Commissioner of Customs |
2015, 2016 |
88.74 |
|
Supreme Court |
2013 |
1406.94 |
Additional Commissioner (Appeals) |
2011 |
0.90 |
|
Appellate Authority |
2011-2012,2014 |
29.03 |
|
Assessing Authority |
2010-2013 |
628.72 |
|
Assistant Commissioner |
2012-2015 |
269.90 |
|
Board of Madhya Pradesh Commercial Taxes, Bhopal |
1998 |
9.72 |
|
Commissioner |
1993-1994, 19961999, 2001-2004, 2006-2009 |
129.28 |
|
Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) |
2001 |
370.32 |
|
Sales Tax (Centre and state) |
Deputy excise and taxation Commissioner/ Commercial Taxes/Sales tax |
1998,2000-2001, 2004-2006,2008-10 |
66.96 |
Deputy Commissioner |
2011 ,2016 |
164.13 |
|
Excise & Taxation officer |
2009,2013 |
4.09 |
|
High Court |
2003-2005, 2011 |
206.63 |
|
Joint Commissioner |
2002, 2004, 2006, 2009, 2011, 2013 2014, 2016 |
12.89 |
|
Joint Commissioner (Appeals) |
2006-2010 |
4187.18 |
|
Revisional Board |
2006-2011 |
474.57 |
|
VAT Officer |
2011-13 |
16.67 |
|
Sr. Joint commissioner |
2013 |
9.99 |
|
Supreme Court |
2008,2010-2011 |
892.66 |
|
Tribunal |
2003-2004, 20062007 |
220.74 |
|
Stamp Duty |
Chief Controlling Revenue Authority |
1996-1997 |
39.40 |
* Years represent AY for Income tax and financial year for other dues, (both years inclusive) |
(viii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given by the management, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of loans or borrowing to a financial institution, bank or government. The Company did not have any loans or borrowing in respect of debentures during the year.
(ix) According to the information and explanations given by the management, during the year the Company has not raised any money way of initial public offer / further public offer / debt instruments and term loans hence, reporting under clause (ix) is not applicable to the Company and hence not commented upon.
(x) Based upon the audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and according to the information and explanations given by the management, we report that no fraud by the Company or no fraud on the Company by the officers and employees of the Company has been noticed or reported during the year.
(xi) According to the information and explanations given by the management, the managerial remuneration has been paid / provided in accordance with the requisite approvals mandated by the provisions of section 197 read with Schedule V to the Companies Act, 2013.
(xii) In our opinion, the Company is not a Nidhi company. Therefore, the provisions of clause 3(xii) of the order are not applicable to the Company and hence not commented upon.
(xiii) According to the information and explanations given by the management, transactions with the related parties are in compliance with section 177 and 188 of Companies Act, 2013 where applicable and the details have been disclosed in the notes to the financial statements, as required by the applicable accounting standards.
(xiv) According to the information and explanations given by the management, the Company has complied with provisions of section 42 of the Companies Act, 2013 in respect of the preferential allotment or private placement of shares during the year. According to the information and explanations given by the management, we report that the amounts raised, have been used for the purposes for which the funds were raised.
(xv) According to the information and explanations given by the management, the Company has not entered into any noncash transactions with directors or persons connected with him as referred to in section 192 of Companies Act, 2013.
(xvi) According to the information and explanations given to us, the provisions of section 45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 are not applicable to the Company.
ANNEXURE TO THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR''S REPORT OF EVEN DATE ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MIRC ELECTRONICS LIMITED
Report on the Internal Financial Controls under Clause (i) of Sub-section 3 of Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act")
We have audited the internal financial controls over financial reporting of MIRC Electronics Limited ("the Company") as of March 31, 2018 in conjunction with our audit of the financial statements of the Company for the year ended on that date.
Management''s Responsibility for Internal Financial Controls
The Company''s Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal financial controls based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. These responsibilities include the design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls that were operating effectively for ensuring the orderly and efficient conduct of its business, including adherence to the Company''s policies, the safeguarding of its assets, the prevention and detection of frauds and errors, the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, and the timely preparation of reliable financial information, as required under the Companies Act, 2013.
Auditor''s Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company''s internal financial controls over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting (the "Guidance Note") and the Standards on Auditing as specified under section 143(10) of the Companies Act, 2013, to the extent applicable to an audit of internal financial controls and, both issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards and the Guidance Note require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether adequate internal financial controls over financial reporting was established and maintained and if such controls operated effectively in all material respects.
Our audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the adequacy of the internal financial controls system over financial reporting and their operating effectiveness. Our audit of internal financial controls over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal financial controls over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the internal financial controls over financial reporting with reference to these financial statements
Meaning of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting With Reference to these Financial Statements
A company''s internal financial control over financial reporting with reference to these financial statements is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company''s internal financial control over financial reporting with reference to these financial statements includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;
(2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorisations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorised acquisition, use, or disposition of the company''s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Inherent Limitations of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting With Reference to these Financial Statements
Because of the inherent limitations of internal financial controls over financial reporting with reference to these financial statements, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of the internal financial controls over financial reporting with reference to these financial statements to future periods are subject to the risk that the internal financial control over financial reporting with reference to these financial statements may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Opinion
In our opinion, the Company has, in all material respects, adequate internal financial controls over financial reporting with reference to these financial statements and such internal financial controls over financial reporting with reference to these financial statements were operating effectively as at March 31, 2018, based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.
For S R B C & CO LLP
Chartered Accountants
ICAI Firm Registration Number: 324982E/E300003
per Jayesh Gandhi
Partner
Membership Number: 037924
Place of Signature: Mumbai
Date: May 17, 2018
Mar 31, 2017
To the Members of MIRC Electronics Limited Report on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of MIRC Electronics Limited ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at March 31, 2017, the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information. Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements The Company''s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act") with respect to the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards specified under section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014 and the Companies (Accounting Standards) Amendment Rules, 2016. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding of the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and the design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial control that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditor''s Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made there under. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing, issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, as specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant to the Company''s preparation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Company''s Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the financial statements.
Opinion
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31, 2017, its loss, and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s report) Order, 2016 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (11) of section 143 of the Act, we give in the
Annexure 1 a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.
2. As required by section 143 (3) of the Act, we report that:
(a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;
(b) In our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books;
(c) The Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account;
(d) In our opinion, the aforesaid financial statements comply with the Accounting Standards specified under section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014 and the Companies (Accounting Standards) Amendment Rules, 2016;
(e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors as on March 31, 2017, and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2017, from being appointed as a director in terms of section 164 (2) of the Act;
(f) With respect to the adequacy of the internal financial controls over financial reporting of the Company and the operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to our separate Report in "Annexure 2" to this report;
(g) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor''s Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:
i. The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position in its financial statements - Refer Note 31 to the financial statements;
ii. The Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses.
iii. There has been no delay in transferring amounts, required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.
iv. The Company has provided requisite disclosures in Note 42 to these financial statements as to the holding of Specified Bank Notes on November 8, 2016 and December 30, 2016 as well as dealings in Specified Bank Notes during the period from November 8, 2016 to December 30, 2016. However, as stated in Note 42 to the financial statements amounts aggregating to Rs. 0.44 lacs as represented to us by the management have been utilized for other than permitted transactions.
Annexure referred to in paragraph 1 under the heading
"Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements" of our report of even date
Re: MIRC Electronics Limited (''the Company'')
(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.
(b) All fixed assets have not been physically verified by the management during the year but there is a regular programme of verification which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.
(c) According to the information and explanations given by the management, the title deeds of immovable properties included in property, plant and equipment are held in the name of the Company.
(ii) The management has conducted physical verification of inventory at reasonable intervals during the year and no material discrepancies were noticed on such physical verification.
(iii) (a) According to the information and explanations given
to us, the Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to companies, firms, Limited Liability Partnerships or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 3(iii)(a), (b) and (c) of the Order are not applicable to the Company and hence not commented upon.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there are no loans, investments, guarantees, and securities given in respect of which provisions of section 185 and 186 of the Companies Act 2013 are applicable and hence not commented upon.
(v) The Company has not accepted any deposits within the meaning of Sections 73 to 76 of the Act and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014 (as amended). Accordingly, the provisions of clause 3(v) of the Order are not applicable.
(vi) We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the Company pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under section 148(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, related to the manufacture or service of consumer appliances, and are of the opinion that prima facie, the specified accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have not, however, made a detailed examination of the same.
(vii) (a) Undisputed statutory dues including sales-tax, duty of custom, duty of excise, cess and other material statutory dues have been regularly deposited with the appropriate authorities except income-tax, value added tax, entry tax, employees state insurance, profession tax, service tax, provident fund, labour welfare fund where there have been delays in few cases, which are, however, not serious.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, undisputed dues in respect of provident fund, employees'' state insurance, income-tax, service tax, value added tax, labour welfare fund, cess and other statutory dues which were outstanding, at the year end, for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable, are as follows:
Statement of Arrears of Statutory Dues Outstanding for More than Six Months
Name of the Statute |
Nature of the Dues |
Amount ('' in lacs) |
Due Date |
Date of Payment |
The Maharashtra Labour Welfare Fund Act, 1953 |
MLWF |
0.01 |
April 15, 2015 |
Not paid |
The Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 |
ESIC |
0.25 |
April 21, 2015 |
Not paid |
The Maharashtra State Tax on Professions, Trade, Callings and Employment Act, 1975 |
Professional Tax |
0.15 |
April 30, 2015 |
Not paid |
The Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 |
Provident Fund |
0.71 |
April 20, 2015 |
Not paid |
The Finance act, 1994 |
Service Tax |
1.64 |
April 06, 2016 |
Not paid |
The Income Tax Act, 1961 |
TDS |
0.65 |
April 30, 2015 |
Not paid |
The Income Tax Act, 1961 |
TDS |
2.45 |
April 30, 2015 |
Not paid |
The Maharashtra VAT Act, 2002 |
VAT |
5.88 |
April 22, 2016 |
Not paid |
The Maharashtra VAT Act, 2002 |
VAT |
0.44 |
Sept 22, 2016 |
Not paid |
(c) According to the records of the Company, the dues outstanding of income-tax, sales-tax, wealth-tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty, value added tax and cess on account of any dispute, are as follows:
Nature of Dues |
Forum |
Financial Year |
Amount |
Income Tax |
ITAT |
2010-2013 |
286.09 |
CIT(A) |
2014-2015 |
66.44 |
|
High Court |
2001- 2006, 2008 |
1,608.21 |
|
Service Tax |
CESTAT |
2005-2015 |
6,078.41 |
Excise Duty |
Commissioner (Appeals) |
2007-2016 |
207.85 |
Commissioner of Central Excise |
1998, 2000 |
2.02 |
|
High Court |
1999 |
10.00 |
|
CESTAT |
2000, 2005, 2007-2012 |
102.42 |
|
Customs |
CESTAT |
2013 |
174.18 |
Duty |
Commissioner of Customs |
2013, 2014 |
50.88 |
Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) |
2016 |
0.10 |
|
Deputy Commissioner of Customs |
2015, 2016 |
88.74 |
|
Supreme Court |
2013 |
1,406.94 |
|
Additional Commissioner (Appeals) |
2011 |
0.87 |
|
Appellate Authority |
2012-2014 |
29.90 |
|
Assessing Authority |
2011-2013 |
643.81 |
|
Assistant Commissioner |
2012-2015 |
272.24 |
|
Sales Tax |
Board of Madhya Pradesh Commercial Taxes, Bhopal |
1998 |
9.72 |
(Centre and state) |
Commissioner |
1993-1994, 1996-1999, 2001-2004, 2006-2009 |
129.28 |
Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) |
2001, 2009 |
410.20 |
|
Deputy excise and taxation Commissioner |
2010 |
0.14 |
|
Deputy Commissioner |
1998, 2000-2001, 2004- 2006, 2008-2013 |
33.31 |
Nature of Dues |
Forum |
Financial Year |
Amount |
Excise & Taxation officer |
2009, 2013 |
4.09 |
|
High Court |
2003- 2005, 2011 |
225.49 |
|
Joint Commissioner |
2002, 2004, 2006, 2009, 2011, 2013, 2014, 2016 |
12.89 |
|
Joint Commissioner (Appeals) |
2006-2010 |
3,846.54 |
|
Provisional Board |
2006-2011 |
474.57 |
|
VAT Officer |
2011-13 |
16.67 |
|
Sr. Joint commissioner |
2013 |
9.99 |
|
Supreme Court |
2008, 20102011 |
892.66 |
|
Tribunal |
2003-2004, 2006-2007 |
221.05 |
(viii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given by the management, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of loans or borrowing to a financial institution, bank or government or dues to debenture holders.
(ix) According to the information and explanations given by the management, the Company has not raised any money by way of initial public offer / further public offer / debt instruments and term loans hence, reporting under clause (ix) is not applicable to the Company and hence not commented upon.
(x) Based upon the audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and according to the information and explanations given by the management, we report that no fraud by the Company or no fraud / material fraud on the Company by the officers and employees of the Company has been noticed or reported during the year.
(xi) Based on our audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and according to the information and explanations given by the management, we report that the managerial remuneration has been paid / provided in accordance with the requisite approvals mandated by the provisions of section 197 read with Schedule V to the Companies Act, 2013.
(xii) In our opinion, the Company is not a nidhi Company. Therefore, the provisions of clause 3(xii) of the order are not applicable to the Company and hence not commented upon.
(xiii) According to the information and explanations given by the management, transactions with the related parties are in compliance with section 177 and 188 of Companies Act, 2013 where applicable and the details have been disclosed in the notes to the financial statements, as required by the applicable accounting standards.
(xiv) According to the information and explanations given by the management, the Company has complied with provisions of section 42 of the Companies Act, 2013 in respect of the preferential allotment or private placement of equity shares during the year. According to the information and explanations given by the management, we report that the amounts raised, have been used for the purposes for which the funds were raised.
(xv) According to the information and explanations given by the management, the Company has not entered into any noncash transactions with directors or persons connected with him.
(xvi) According to the information and explanations given to us, the provisions of section 45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 are not applicable to the Company.
ANNEXURE 2 TO THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR''S REPORT OF EVEN DATE ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MIRC ELECTRONICS LIMITED
Report on the Internal Financial Controls under Clause (i) of Sub-section 3 of Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act")
We have audited the internal financial controls over financial reporting of MIRC Electronics Limited ("the Company") as of March 31, 2017 in conjunction with our audit of the financial statements of the Company for the year ended on that date. Management''s Responsibility for Internal Financial Controls The Company''s Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal financial controls based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. These responsibilities include the design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls that were operating effectively for ensuring the orderly and efficient conduct of its business, including adherence to the Company''s policies, the safeguarding of its assets, the prevention and detection of frauds and errors, the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, and the timely preparation of reliable financial information, as required under the Companies Act, 2013.
Auditor''s Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company''s internal financial controls over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting (the "Guidance Note") and the Standards on Auditing as specified under section 143(10) of the Companies Act, 2013, to the extent applicable to an audit of internal financial controls and, both issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards and the Guidance Note require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether adequate internal financial controls over financial reporting was established and maintained and if such controls operated effectively in all material respects.
Our audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the adequacy of the internal financial controls system over financial reporting and their operating effectiveness. Our audit of internal financial controls over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal financial controls over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the internal financial controls system over financial reporting.
Meaning of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting
A Company''s internal financial control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A Company''s internal financial control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company''s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Inherent Limitations of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting
Because of the inherent limitations of internal financial controls over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of the internal financial controls over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the internal financial control over financial reporting may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Opinion
In our opinion, the Company has, in all material respects, an adequate internal financial controls system over financial reporting and such internal financial controls over financial reporting were operating effectively as at March 31, 2017, based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.
For S R B C & CO LLP
Chartered Accountants
ICAI Firm Registration Number: 324982E/E300003
per Jayesh Gandhi Partner
Membership Number: 037924
Place of Signature: Mumbai
Date: May 22, 2017
Mar 31, 2016
To the Members of MIRC Electronics Limited Report on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying standalone financial statements of MIRC Electronics Limited ("the Company"), which comprises the Balance Sheet as at March 31, 2016, the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements
The Company''s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act") with respect to the preparation of these standalone financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards specified under section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding of the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and the design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial control that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditor''s Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these standalone financial statements based on our audit. We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made there under. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing, issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, as specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant to the Company''s preparation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Company''s Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the standalone financial statements.
Opinion
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the standalone financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31, 2016, its loss, and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s report) Order, 2016 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (11) of section 143 of the Act, we give in the Annexure 1 a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.
2. As required by section 143 (3) of the Act, we report that:
(a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;
(b) In our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books;
(c) The Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account;
(d) In our opinion, the aforesaid standalone financial statements comply with the Accounting Standards specified under section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014;
(e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors as on March 31, 2016, and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2016, from being appointed as a director in terms of section 164 (2) of the Act;
(f) With respect to the adequacy of the internal financial controls over financial reporting of the Company and the operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to our separate Report in "Annexure 2" to this report;
(g) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor''s Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:
i. The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position in its financial statements - Refer Note 27 to the financial statements;
ii. The Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses.
iii. There has been no delay in transferring amounts, required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company
Re: MIRC Electronics Limited (''the Company'')
(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.
(b) All fixed assets have not been physically verified by the management during the year but there is a regular programmed of verification which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.
(c) Based on our audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and according to information and explanations given by the management, the title deeds of immovable properties included in fixed assets are held in the name of the company.
(ii) The management has conducted physical verification of inventory at reasonable intervals during the year and no material discrepancies were noticed on such physical verification.
(iii) (a) The Company has granted unsecured loans to two companies covered in the register maintained under section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the terms and conditions of the grants and loans are not prejudicial to the company''s interest.
(a) In respect of loans granted to companies covered in the register maintained under section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013, repayment of the principal amount is as stipulated and payment of interest has been regular.
(c) There is no amount of loans granted to companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013 which are overdue for more than ninety days.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, provisions of section 185 and 186 of the Companies Act 2013 in respect of loans to directors including entities in which they are interested and in respect of loans and advances given, investments made and, guarantees, and securities given have been complied with by the company
(v) The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public.
(vi) . We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the Company pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under section 148(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, related to the products manufactured and are of the opinion that prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have not, however, made a detailed examination of the same.
(vii) (a) Undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, employees'' state insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, service tax duty of custom, duty of excise , value added tax, cess and other material statutory dues have not been regularly deposited with the appropriate authorities and there have been serious delays in large number of cases.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of provident fund, employees'' state insurance, income-tax, service tax, sales-tax, duty of custom, duty of excise, value added tax, cess and other material statutory dues were outstanding, at the year end, for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.
(c) According to the records of the Company, the dues outstanding of income-tax, sales-tax, wealth-tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty, value added tax and cess on account of any dispute, are as follows:
* Years represent AY for Income tax and financial year for other dues, (both years inclusive)
(viii) Based on our audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and according to information and explanations given by the management, the Company has delayed in repayment of dues to bank during the year to the extent of Rs 9,029,801/-(the delay in such repayments being for less than 4 days in each individual case) and no such dues were in arrears as on the balance sheet date.
(ix) Based on our audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and according to the information and explanations given by the management and on an overall examination of the balance sheet, we report that monies raised by way of term loans were applied for the purposes for which those were raised.
(x) Based upon the audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and according to the information and explanations given by the management, we report that no fraud by the company or on the company by the officers and employees of the Company has been noticed or reported during the year.
(xi) Based on our audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and according to the information and explanations given by the management, we report that the managerial remuneration has been paid / provided in accordance with the requisite approvals mandated by the provisions of section 197 read with Schedule V to the Companies Act, 2013.
(xii) In our opinion, the Company is not a nidhi company. Therefore, the provisions of clause 3(xii) of the order are not applicable to the Company and hence not commented upon.
(xiii) Based on our audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and according to the information and explanations given by the management, transactions with the related parties are in compliance with section 177 and 188 of Companies Act, 2013 where applicable and the details have been disclosed in the notes to the financial statements, as required by the applicable accounting standards.
(xiv) Based on our audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and according to the information and explanations given by the management, the Company has complied with provisions of section 42 of the Companies Act, 2013 in respect of the preferential allotment or private placement of shares during the year. Based on our audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and according to the information and explanations given by the management, we report that the amounts raised, have been used for the purposes for which the funds were raised.
(xv) Based on our audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and according to the information and explanations given by the management, the Company has not entered into any non-cash transactions with directors or persons connected with him.
(xvi) According to the information and explanations given to us, the provisions of section 45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 are not applicable to the Company.
Report on the Internal Financial Controls under Clause (i) of Subsection 3 of Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act")
We have audited the internal financial controls over financial reporting of MIRC Electronics Limited ("the Company") as of March 31, 2016 in conjunction with our audit of the standalone financial statements of the Company for the year ended on that date.
Management''s Responsibility for Internal Financial Controls
The Company''s Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal financial controls based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. These responsibilities include the design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls that were operating effectively for ensuring the orderly and efficient conduct of its business, including adherence to the Company''s policies, the safeguarding of its assets, the prevention and detection of frauds and errors, the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, and the timely preparation of reliable financial information, as required under the Companies Act, 2013.
Auditor''s Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company''s internal financial controls over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting (the "Guidance Note") and the Standards on Auditing as specified under section 143(10) of the Companies Act, 2013, to the extent applicable to an audit of internal financial controls, both applicable to an audit of Internal Financial Controls and, both issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards and the Guidance Note require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether adequate internal financial controls over financial reporting was established and maintained and if such controls operated effectively in all material respects.
Our audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the adequacy of the internal financial controls system over financial reporting and their operating effectiveness. Our audit of internal financial controls over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal financial controls over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the internal financial controls system over financial reporting.
Meaning of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting
A company''s internal financial control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company''s internal financial control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company''s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Inherent Limitations of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting
Because of the inherent limitations of internal financial controls over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of the internal financial controls over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the internal financial control over financial reporting may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Opinion
In our opinion, the Company has, in all material respects, an adequate internal financial controls system over financial reporting and such internal financial controls over financial reporting were operating effectively as at March 31, 2016, based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.
For S R B C & CO LLP Chartered Accountants ICAI Firm Registration Number: 324982E/E300003
Per Jayesh Gandhi Partner Membership Number: 037924
Place of Signature: Mumbai Date: 26 May 2016
Mar 31, 2015
We have audited the accompanying standalone financial statements of
MIRC Electronics Limited ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance
Sheet as at March 31, 2015, the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash
Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of significant
accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Management's Responsibility for the Financial Statements
The Company's Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated
in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act")with respect to
the preparation of these standalone financial statements that give a
true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and
cash flows of the Company in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards
specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the
Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014. This responsibility also includes
maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the
provisions of the Act for safeguarding of the assets of the Company and
for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection
and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments
and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and the design,
implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial control
that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and
completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and
presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view
and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditor's Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these standalone
financial statements based on our audit. We have taken into account the
provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and
matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the
provisions of the Act and the Rules made thereunder. We conducted our
audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing, issued by the
Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, as specified under Section
143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical
requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material
misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures
selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of
the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether
due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor
considers internal financial control relevant to the Company's
preparation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view
in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on
whether the Company has in place an adequate internal financial
controls system over financial reporting and the effectiveness of such
controls. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of
accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting
estimates made by the Company's Directors, as well as evaluating the
overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the
audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to
provide a basis for our audit opinion on the standalone financial
statements.
Opinion
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the
explanations given to us, the standalone financial statements give the
information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a
true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India of the state of affairs of the Company as
at March 31, 2015, its profit and its cash flows for the year ended on
that date.
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
1. As required by the Companies (Auditor's report) Order, 2015 ("the
Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of
sub-section (11) of Section 143 of the Act, we give in the Annexure 1 a
statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.
2. As required by Section 143 (3) of the Act, we report that:
(a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations
which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the
purpose of our audit;
(b) In our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been
kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those
books;
(c) The Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of
account;
(d) In our opinion, the aforesaid standalone financial statements
comply with the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the
Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014;
(e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors
as on March 31, 2015, and taken on record by the Board of Directors,
none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2015, from being
appointed as a director in terms of Section 164 (2) of the Act;
(f) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor's
Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors)
Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and
according to the explanations given to us:
i. The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its
financial position in its financial statements - Refer Note 27 to the
financial statements;
ii. The Company did not have any long-term contracts including
derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable
losses;
iii. There has been no delay in transferring amounts, required to be
transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the
Company.
ANNEXURE TO THE AUDITOR'S REPORT
Annexure referred to in paragraph 1 under the heading "Report on Other
Legal and Regulatory Requirements" of our report of even date
Re: MIRC Electronics Limited ('the Company')
(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
(b) All fixed assets have not been physically verified by the
management during the year but there is a regular programme of
verification which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the
size of the Company and the nature of its assets. No material
discrepancies were noticed on such verification.
(ii)(a) The management has conducted physical verification of inventory
at reasonable intervals during the year.
(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by
the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of
the Company and the nature of its business.
(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory and no
material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.
(iii) (a) In respect of loans granted to Company covered in the
register maintained under Section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013,
repayment of the principal amount is as stipulated and payment of
interest has been regular.
(b) There is no overdue amount of loans granted to companies, firms or
other parties listed in the register maintained under Section 189 of
the Companies Act, 2013.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate
with the size of the Company and the nature of its business, for the
purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and
services. During the course of our audit,we have not observed any major
weakness or continuing failure to correct any major weakness in the
internal control system of the company in respect of these areas.
(v) The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public.
(vi) We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the
Company pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government for the
maintenance of cost records under section 148(1) of the Companies Act,
2013, related to the products manufactured and are of the opinion that
prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been made and
maintained. We have not, however, made a detailed examination of the
same.
(vii) (a) Undisputed statutory dues including provident fund,
employees' state insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, wealth-tax, service
tax, customs duty, excise duty, value added tax, cess and other
material statutory dues have not been regularly deposited with the
appropriate authorities and there have been serious delays in large
number of cases.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
undisputed amounts payable in respect of provident fund, employees'
state insurance, income- tax, wealth-tax, service tax, sales-tax,
customs duty, excise duty, value added tax, cess and other material
statutory dues were outstanding, at the year end, for a period of more
than six months from the date they became payable.
(c) According to the records of the Company, the dues outstanding of
income-tax, sales-tax, wealth-tax, service tax, customs duty, excise
duty, value added tax and cess on account of any dispute, are as
follows:
Nature of Financial Year Forum where dispute Amount in
Dues is pending Lakhs
Excise Duty 1997-98,1999-00, Commissioner (Appeals) 52.02
2001-05
1998 - 99 High Court 10.00
1999 - 00 CESTAT 23.80
Service Tax 2004 - 2011 Service Tax Appellate 696.55
Tribunal
2007 - 12 Commissioner (Appeals) 80.33
Customs 2012-13 CESTAT 174.18
2012-13 Supreme Court 1,406.94
2014-15 Assistant Commissioner 25.07
2014-15 JC COMMISSIONER 22.81
2012-2013, Commissioner 50.88
2013-2014
Sales Tax 2009-10,2011-12 AA -ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER 0.99
(Central & 2008-09,2011-12 Appellate Authority 54.40
State)
2009-10 Assessing Authority 314.87
2002-03,2003-04, Commercial Tax Tribunal 205.69
2005-06,2006-07,
2007-08
1992-94,1995-99, Commissioner 47.04
2000-2004,
2008-2009
1997-98,1999-01, Deputy Commissioner 49.24
2003-06, 2007-10,
2010-12
2009-10 Deputy excise and taxation 0.14
Commissioner
2000-01,2008-09, Deputy Commissioner (A) 1,788.33
2011-12, 2012-13
2008-09,2010-11, Excise & Taxation officer 4.60
2012-13
2002-05 High Court 178.30
2001-02, 2003-04, Joint Commissioner 2.98
2005-07,2010-2011
2005-06, 2012-13 Joint Commissioner(Appeals) 727.95
2003-04, 2005-08, Revisional Board. 1,302.28
2010-11
2010-12, 2013-15 Assistant Commissioner 211.13
2008-2009 MP COM TAX DEP 1.86
2010-2011 VAT officer 4.00
1997-1998 Board of Commercial Taxes, 9.72
Bhopal
2006-08, 2009-11 Supreme Court 914.98
Income Tax 1996-97,1999-00, High court 1,440.65
2000-01,2002-03,
2003-04,2004-05,
2005-06, 2006-07
2007-08,2009-10 Appellate Tribunal 283.31
2008-09,2010-11, CIT (Appeals) 318.82
2011-12
(d) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
amount required to be transferred to investor education and protection
fund in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Companies Act,
1956 (1 of 1956) and rules made thereunder has been transferred to such
fund within time.
(viii) The Company has no accumulated losses at the end of the
financial year and it has not incurred cash losses in the current
financial year. In the immediately preceding financial year, the
Company had incurred cash loss.
(ix) Based on our audit procedures and as per the information and
explanations given by the management, we are of the opinion that the
Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to a financial
institution, bank or debenture holders.
(x) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has given guarantee for loans taken by its subsidiary from
banks, the terms and conditions whereof, in our opinion, are not
prima-facie prejudicial to the interest of the Company as it is given
for its subsidiary.
(xi) The Company did not have any term loans outstanding during the
year.
(xii) Based upon the audit procedures performed for the purpose of
reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and as per
the information and explanations given by the management, we report
that no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during
the year.
For S R B C & CO LLP
Chartered Accountants
ICAI Firm Registration Number: 324982E
per Jayesh Gandhi
Partner
Membership No.: 037924
Place : Mumbai
Date : May 07, 2015
Mar 31, 2014
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of MIRC
Electronics Limited ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet
as at March 31, 2014, and the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash
Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of signif cant
accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial
statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, f
-inancial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the
Accounting Standards notif ed under the Companies Act, 1956, read with
General Circular 8/2014 dated 4 April 2014 issued by the Ministry of
Corporate Af airs. This responsibility includes the design,
implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the
preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a
true and fair view and are free from material mis-statement, whether
due to fraud or error.
Auditor''s Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance
with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with
ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures
selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of
the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether
due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor
considers internal control relevant to the Company''s preparation and
fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances but not for the
purpose of expressing an opinion on the ef ectiveness of the entity''s
internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness
of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the audit
evidence we have obtained is suf cient and appropriate to provide a
basis for our audit opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the
explanations given to us, the financial statements give the information
required by the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act") in the manner so
required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the
accounting principles generally accepted in India:
(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at March 31, 2014;
(b) in the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the loss for
the year ended on that date; and
(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the
year ended on that date.
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 ("the
Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of
sub-section (4A) of Section 227 of the Act, we give in the Annexure a
statement on the matters specif ed in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.
2. As required by section 227(3) of the Act, we report that:
(a) We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit;
(b) In our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been
kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those
books;
(c) The Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of
account;
(d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss and
Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards notif ed under
the Companies Act, 1956, read with General Circular 8/2014 dated April
4, 2014 issued by the Ministry of Corporate Af airs;
(e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors
as on March 31, 2014, and taken on record by the Board of Directors,
none of the directors is disqualif ed as on March 31, 2014, from being
appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of
section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.
Annexure referred to in paragraph 1 under the heading "Report on Other
Legal and Regulatory Requirements" of our report of even date
Re: MIRC Electronics Limited (''the Company'')
(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
(b) All fixed assets were physically verif ed by the management in the
previous year in accordance with a planned programme of verifying them
once in three years which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard
to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. No material
discrepancies were noticed on such verif cation.
(c) There was no disposal of a substantial part of fixed assets during
the period.
(ii) (a) The management has conducted physical verification of
inventory at reasonable intervals during the year.
(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by
the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of
the Company and the nature of its business.
(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory and no
material discrepancies were noticed on physical verif cation.
(iii) (a) The Company has granted loan to three parties covered in the
register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The
maximum amount involved during the year was Rs. 356 lakhs and the
year-end balance of loans granted to such parties was Rs. 125 lakhs.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions for
such loans are not prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the
Company.
(c) The loans granted are re-payable on demand. We are informed that
the loans have been repaid on demand and thus, there has been no
default on the part of the parties to whom the money has been lent. The
payment of interest has been regular.
(d) There is no overdue amount of loans granted to companies, firms or
other parties listed in the register maintained under Section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956.
(e) According to information and explanations given to us, the Company
has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured, from companies, firms or
other parties covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(iii)
(e) to (g) of the Order are not applicable to the Company and hence not
commented upon.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate
with the size of the Company and the nature of its business, for the
purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and
services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any
major weakness or continuing failure to correct any major weakness in
the internal control system of the company in respect of these areas.
(v) (a) According to the information and explanations provided by the
management, we are of the opinion that the particulars of contracts or
arrangements referred to in Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 that
need to be entered into the register maintained under section 301 have
been so entered.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or
arrangements and exceeding the value of Rupees five lakhs have been
entered into during the financial year at prices which are reasonable
having regard to the prevailing market prices at the relevant time.
(vi) The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public.
(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system
commensurate with the size of the Company and nature of its business.
(viii) We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the
Company pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government for the
maintenance of cost records under section 209(1)(d) of the Companies
Act, 1956, related to the products manufactured and are of the opinion
that prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been made
and maintained. We have not, however, made a detailed examination of
the same
(ix) (a) Undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor
education and protection fund, employees'' state insurance, income-tax,
sales-tax, wealth-tax, service tax customs duty, excise duty cess and
other material statutory dues have not been regularly deposited with
the appropriate authorities and there have been serious delays in large
number of cases. The said delayed statutory dues are subsequently paid.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
undisputed amounts payable in respect of provident fund, investor
education and protection fund, employees'' state insurance, income-tax,
wealth-tax, service tax, sales-tax, customs duty, excise duty cess and
other material statutory dues were outstanding, at the year end, for a
period of more than six months from the date they became payable.
(c) According to the records of the Company, the dues outstanding of
income-tax, sales-tax, wealth-tax, service tax, customs duty, excise
duty and cess on account of any dispute, are as follows:
Nature of Financial Year Forum where Dispute is Pending Amount in
dues Lakhs
Excise
Duty 1999 - 2000 &
2005 - 2006,
2004 to 2010 CESTAT 230.44
1998 Â 1999 High Court 10.00
1997 - 1998,
1999 - 2000,
2001 - 2005,
2010 to 2012 Commissioner of Excise & Custom 56.43
Service
Tax 2004 Â 2011 Service Tax Appellate Tribunal 612.00
2003 - 2004,
2005 - 2006,
2006 - 2007,
2007 Â 2008 Revisional Board 181.38
2005 Â 2006 Additional Commissioner 13.20
2009 Â 2010 Assessing Authority 318.84
2008 Â 2009 Commissioner 47.04
1997 - 1998,
1999 - 2000,
2000 - 2001,
2003 - 2004, Deputy Commissioner of
Commercial Taxes 32.08
2004 - 2005,
2005 - 2006,
2006 - 2007,
2007 - 2008,
2009 - 2010
Sales Tax
2000 - 2001,
2008 - 2009,
2011 - 2012,
2012 Â 2013 Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) 1,773.35
(Central &
1991 - 1992,
2002 - 2003,
2003 - 2004,
2004 - 2005,
2005 - High Court 322.08
State)
2006, 2006 -
2007, 2007 Â
2008
2003 - 2004,
2005 - 2006,
2006 - 2007,
2007 - 2008, Joint Commissioner 341.80
2010 - 2011
2006 - 2007,
2009 - 2010,
2010 Â 2011 Joint Commissioner of
Commercial Taxes (Appeal) 18.88
2002 - 2003,
2003 - 2004,
2005 - 2006,
2006 Â 2007 Tribunal 65.30
2008 Â 2009 Board of Madhya Pradesh
Commercial Taxes 11.58
2005 Â 2006 Joint Commissioner Appeals 651.66
Income Tax 2009 Â 2010 CIT (Appeals) 110.77
(x) The Company has no accumulated losses at the end of the financial
year but it has incurred cash losses in the current and immediately
preceding financial year.
(xi) Based on our audit procedures and as per the information and
explanations given by the management, we are of the opinion that the
Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to a financial
institution, bank or debenture holders.
(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us and
based on the documents and records produced before us, the Company has
not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of
pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
(xiii) In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi /
mutual benef t fund / society. Therefore, the provisions of clause
4(xiii) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 (as amended)
are not applicable to the Company.
(xiv) In our opinion, the Company is not dealing in or trading in
shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the
provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order,
2003 (as amended) are not applicable to the Company.
(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has given guarantee for loans taken by its wholly owned
subsidiary from banks, the terms and conditions whereof, in our
opinion, are not prima-facie prejudicial to the interest of the Company
as it is given for wholly owned subsidiary.
(xvi) Based on the information and explanations given to us by the
management, term loans were applied for the purpose for which the loans
were obtained.
(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on
an overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, we report
that funds raised on short term basis have not been used for long term
investment, however funds infused by the promoters and funds released
by way of reduction in working capital have been utilized for meeting
loss incurred during the year.
(xviii) The Company has not made any preferential allotment of
shares to parties or companies covered in the register maintained under
Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(xix) The Company did not have any outstanding debentures during the
year.
(xx) The Company has not raised any money through public issue during
the year.
(xxi) Based upon the audit procedures performed for the purpose of
reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and as per
the information and explanations given by the management, we report
that no material fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or
reported during the year.
For S. R. Batliboi & Co. LLP
ICAI Firm registration number: 301003E
Chartered Accountants
per Ravi Bansal
Partner
Membership No: 49365
Place : Mumbai
Date : May 15, 2014
Mar 31, 2013
1. Report on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying fnancial statements of MIRC
ELECTRONICS LIMITED (''the Company''), which comprise the Balance Sheet
as at March 31, 2013, and the Proft and Loss Statement and Cash Flow
Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of signifcant
accounting policies and other explanatory information.
2. Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements
Management of the Company is responsible for the preparation of these
fnancial statements that give a true and fair view of the fnancial
position, fnancial performance and cash fows of the Company in
accordance with the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section
(3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act"). This
responsibility includes the design, implementation and maintenance of
internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of the
fnancial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from
material misstatements, whether due to fraud or error.
3. Auditor''s Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these fnancial
statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance
with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India. Those standards require that we comply with
ethical requirement and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the fnancial statements are free from material
misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit
evidence about the amount and disclosures in the fnancial statements.
The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the
assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the fnancial
statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk
assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the
Company''s preparation and fair presentation of the fnancial statements
in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of
accounting policies used and reasonableness of the accounting estimates
made by the management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation
of the fnancial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have
obtained is sufcient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit
opinion.
4. Opinion
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the
explanations given to us, the fnancial statements give the information
required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair
view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in
India:
(i) In the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of afairs of the
Company as at March 31, 2013;
(ii) In the case of the Proft and Loss Statement, of the loss for the
year ended on that date; and
(iii) In the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash fows for the
year ended on that date.
5. Emphasis of Matters
(i) We draw attention to Note no. 29 of the Financial Statements with
regards to the claim receivable from the Insurance Company and
outstanding of Rs. 4995.50 lacs as on the balance sheet date. The
Management of the Company is confdent of recovery of the full amount
and therefore no further provision has been made. Our opinion is not
qualifed in respect of this matter.
(ii) We also draw attention to Note no. 34 of the fnancial statements
relating to excess managerial remuneration of Rs. 65.07 lacs charged to
the proft and loss statement of the current year, which is subject to
the approval of the Central Government. Our opinion is not qualifed in
respect of this matter.
6. Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
(i) As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) order, 2003 issued
by the Central Government of India in terms of sub- section (4A) of
section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a
statement of the matters specifed in paragraph 4 and 5 of the said
order.
(ii) Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in Paragraph 6
(i) above, as required by section 227(3) of the Act, we report that;
(a) we have obtained all the information and explanation which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit;
(b) in our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been
kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those
books;
(c) the Balance Sheet, Proft and Loss Statement and Cash Flow Statement
dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;
(d) in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Proft and Loss Statement and
Cash Flow Statement dealt herewith comply with the Accounting Standards
referred to in Section 211 (3C) of the Companies Act, 1956;
(e) on the basis of the written representations received from the
Directors and taken on records by the Board of Directors, none of the
Director is disqualifed, as at the balance sheet date, from being
appointed as a Director in terms of section 274 (1) (g) of the
Companies Act, 1956;
(f) since the Central Government has not issued any notifcation as to
the rate at which the cess is to be paid under section 441A of the
Companies Act, 1956 nor has it issued any Rules under the said section,
prescribing the manner in which such cess is to be paid, no cess is due
and payable by the Company.
Referred to in paragraph 6 (i) of the Auditors Report of even date of
MIRC ELECTRONICS LIMITED for the year ended March 31, 2013.
(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of its fxed
assets.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has a regular programme of physical verifcation by which a
substantial portion of the fxed assets has been physically verifed by
the management during the year. In our opinion, the frequency of
verifcation of the fxed assets by the management is reasonable having
regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. To the
best of our knowledge, no material discrepancies were noticed on
verifcation conducted during the year as compared with the book records
and the same have been appropriately dealt with in the books of
account.
(c) Fixed assets disposed of during the year were not substantial to
afect Going Concern Assumption.
(ii) (a) Inventories have been physically verifed during the year by
the Management. In our opinion, the frequency of verifcation is
reasonable.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the procedures of physical verifcation of inventories
followed by the Management were reasonable and adequate in relation to
the size of the Company and the nature of its business.
(c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company is maintaining proper records of inventory.
The discrepancies noticed on physical verifcation as compared to the
book records were not material and have been properly dealt with in the
books of account.
(iii) (a) The Company has granted unsecured loan to three parties
covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956. The outstanding amount as at the balance sheet date and
maximum amount outstanding during the year is Rs. 356 lacs and Rs. 604 lacs
respectively.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions on
which said loans have been granted are not, prima facie, prejudicial to
the interest of the Company.
(c) As per the repayment terms of the loan no amount is due, however an
amount of Rs. 208.70 lacs is prepaid and the interest is received as per
the terms on due date.
(d) The Company has not taken any unsecured loan from parties covered
in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act,
1956.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there are adequate internal control procedures
commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its
business with regard to purchases of inventory, fxed assets and with
regard to the sale of goods and services. During the course of our
audit, we have not observed any major weakness in the internal control
system.
(v) To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the
information and explanations given to us:
a) The particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to in Section
301 that need to be entered in the Register maintained under the said
section have been so entered.
b) During the year, there are transactions of purchase of services,
exceeding rupees fve lacs per annum, from one party covered under
section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. As per the information and
explanation provided to us, the said purchases of services are of a
special nature and therefore, comparative prices are not available.
(vi) The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public and
hence section 58A and 58AA of the Companies Act, 1956 and rules framed
there under are not applicable to the Company.
(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system
commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
(viii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Central Government has prescribed maintenance of cost records under
Section 209 (1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 for the products
manufactured by the Company. We have broadly reviewed the books of
account maintained and in our opinion; prima facie, the prescribed
accounts and records have been made and maintained by the Company. We
have not, however, made a detailed examination of the records with a
view to determine whether they are accurate or complete.
(ix) (a) According to the information and explanations provided to us,
the Company is generally regular in depositing undisputed statutory
dues including Provident fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund,
Employees'' State Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service
Tax, Custom duty, Excise duty, cess and other applicable statutory dues
with the appropriate authorities. No undisputed statutory dues payable
were in arrears as at March 31, 2013, for a period of more than six
months from the date they became payable.
(x) The Company does not have accumulated losses as at March 31, 2013
and has incurred cash loss during the current fnancial year covered by
our audit and in the immediately preceding fnancial year.
(xi) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to any fnancial
institutions or banks.
(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by
way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
(xiii) The Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi / mutual beneft fund /
society. The provisions of clause 4 (xiii) of the Order, therefore, are
not applicable to the Company.
(xiv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities, debentures and
other investments.
(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has given a guarantee of Rs. 2132 lacs for loans taken by one of
its wholly owned subsidiaries from bank. In our opinion, the terms and
conditions of the guarantee are, prima facie, not considered
prejudicial to the interest of the Company as it is given for the
wholly owned subsidiary.
(xvi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there were no term loans raised during the year.
(xvii) I n our opinion and according to the information and
explanations given to us, and on an overall examination of the Balance
Sheet of the Company, we report that funds raised on short-term basis
have not been utilised for long term investment.
(xviii) A c c o r ding to the information and explanations given to us,
during the year, the Company has not made any preferential allotment of
shares to parties and Companies covered in the register maintained
under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(xix) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not issued any secured debentures, which are outstanding
during the year.
(xx) During the year, the Company has not raised any money by way of a
public issue.
(xxi) To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the
information and explanations given to us, we report that no fraud on or
by the Company has been noticed or reported, during the year.
For N. M. RAIJI & CO.
Chartered Accountants
Firm Registration No.108296W
J. M. GANDHI
Place : Mumbai Partner
Date : May 14, 2013 Membership No: 37924
Mar 31, 2012
1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of MIRC Electronics
Limited ('the Company') as at March 31, 2012 and also the related
Profit and Loss Statement and the Cash Flow Statement for the year
ended on that date annexed thereto. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with standards on auditing
generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003, as
amended by the Companies (Auditor's Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004
(hereinafter to be referred to as "the Order") issued by the Central
Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the
Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the
matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order, to the
extent applicable.
4. Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to Note no. 28(1)
to the financial statements in respect of fire at one of the Company's
manufacturing plant and assessment of loss by the management. In
absence of any confirmation from the insurance company, we have relied
on the management assessment.
5. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 3
above, we report that:
(i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit;
(ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of
those books;
(iii) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Statement and Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account;
(iv) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Statement and
Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the
accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of
the Companies Act, 1956;
(v) On the basis of written representations received from the directors
as on March 31, 2012 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we
report that none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2012
from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-
section (1) of Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;
(vi) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said financial statements together
with the notes thereon give the information required by the Companies
Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in
conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:
(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at March 31, 2012;
(b) in the case of the Profit and Loss Statement, of the Loss for the
year ended on that date and
(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the
year ended on that date.
Referred to in paragraph 3 of the Auditors report of even date of MIRC
Electronics Limited for the year ended March 31, 2012.
(i) a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets;
b) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has a regular programme of physical verification by which a
substantial portion of the fixed assets has been physically verified by
the management during the year. In our opinion, the frequency of
verification of the fixed assets by the management is reasonable having
regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. To the
best of our knowledge, no material discrepancies were noticed on
verification conducted during the year as compared with the book
records and the same have been appropriately dealt with in the books of
accounts.
c) During the year certain manufacturing assets was destroyed by fire.
However it does not affect the going concern assumption as the Company
has other manufacturing location.
(ii) a) Inventories have been physically verified by the Management
during the year. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is
reasonable.
b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the procedures for physical verification of the
inventories followed by the management were generally reasonable and
adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its
business.
c) In our opinion the Company is maintaining proper records of
inventory. The discrepancies noticed between the physical stocks and
the book stocks were not material and have been properly dealt with in
the books of account.
(iii) a) The Company has granted unsecured loan to three parties
covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956. The outstanding amount as at the balance sheet date and
maximum amount outstanding during the year is Rs 604.00 lacs and Rs
1094.00 lacs respectively.
b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions on
which said loans have been granted are not, prima facie, prejudicial to
the interest of the Company.
c) As per the repayment terms of the loan no amount is due, however an
amount of Rs 490 lacs is prepaid and the interest is received as per the
terms on due date.
d) The Company has not taken any unsecured loan from parties covered in
the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, generally there are adequate internal control procedures
commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its
business with regard to purchase of inventory, fixed assets and for
sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, no major
weakness has been noticed in the internal control system.
(v) a) To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the
information and explanations given to us, we are of the opinion that
the particulars of contracts and arrangements that need to be entered
into the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act,
1956 have been properly entered in the said register.
b) During the year, there are transactions of purchase of services,
exceeding rupees five lacs per annum, from one party covered under
section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. As per the information and
explanation provided to us, the said purchases of services are of a
special nature and therefore, comparative prices are not available.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has complied with the provisions of Sections
58A and 58AA of the Companies Act, 1956 and the rules framed there
under with regard to the deposits accepted from the public. We are
informed by the Management that no order has been passed by the Company
Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or
any court or any other Tribunal in this regard.
(vi) In our opinion, the Company has adequate system of internal audit,
which is commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
(vii) We have broadly reviewed the books of accounts maintained by the
Company pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government under
Section 209(1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 for maintenance of cost
records in respect of products manufactured and are of the opinion
that, prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been
maintained by the Company. We have, however, not made a detailed
examination of the records with a view to determine whether they are
accurate or complete.
(viii) a) According to the information and explanations provided to us,
the Company is generally regular in depositing undisputed statutory
dues including Provident fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund,
Employees' State Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service
Tax, Custom duty, Excise duty, Service Tax, cess and other applicable
statutory dues with the appropriate authorities.
b) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
details of statutory dues which have not been deposited with the
concerned authorities on account of dispute are given below:
Nature of Relevant Financial
Year Forum where Dispute
Is Pending Amount
dues involved
(Rs. in
Lacs)
Central 1998-99 High Court 72.69
Excise
1997-98, 1999-2000,
2001-05, 2005-06 Commissioner Central
Excise 54.25
1999-2000, 2005-06 Excise Appellate
Tribunal 181.10
1997-98 Board of Madhya Pradesh
Commercial Taxes, Bhopal 9.72
1991-92, 2002-08 High Court 320.96
2007-08 Supreme Court 0.55
1992-94, 1995-99,
2000-04, Commissioner 39.20
2006-07, 2008-09
2003-04, 2005-07 Revisional Board 187.49
Sales Tax 2005-06 Deputy Commissioner
Sales Tax 5.09
2008-09 Deputy Excise and
Taxation Commissioner 3.98
1997-98, 1999-01,
2003-05, 2006-08, Deputy Commissioner of
Commercial Taxes 35.12
2005-08 Additional Commissioner
Sales Tax 24.96
2008-09 Assistant Commissioner
(Appeal) 38.03
2002-04 Tribunal 58.87
2001-02, 2003-04,
2005-06, 2006-07 Joint Commissioner -
Sales Tax 3.04
Income Tax 2007-08 CIT (Appeals) 77.69
Customs 1998-99, 2001-02,
2008-11 Commissioner of Customs 311.36
Service Tax 2004-2011 Service Tax Appellate
Tribunal 30462.31
(ix) The company does not have accumulated losses and has incurred cash
losses during the financial year and has not incurred cash loss in
immediately preceding financial year.
(x) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to any financial
institutions or banks.
(xi) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by
way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
(xii) The Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/mutual benefit
fund/society. The provisions of clause 4 (xiii) of the Order,
therefore, are not applicable to the Company.
(xiii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities, and
debentures. However, it has dealings in Mutual Fund units during the
year. For the transactions in Mutual fund units the Company has
maintained proper records and has made timely entries therein. All the
shares, securities and other investments are held by the Company in its
own name.
(xiv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the terms and conditions on which the Company has given
guarantee for loan taken by its subsidiary from bank is not, prima
facie, prejudicial to the interest of the Company.
(xv) In our opinion and on the basis ofthe information and explanation
given to us, the term loans have been applied for the purpose for which
they were raised other than amounts temporarily invested pending
utilisation of the funds for the stated use.
(xvi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the
Company, we report that funds raised on short-term basis have not been
utilised for long term investment.
(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us,
during the year, the Company has not made any preferential allotment of
shares to parties and companies covered in the register maintained
under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(xviii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not issued any secured debentures, which are outstanding
during the year.
(xix) During the year, the Company has not raised any money by way of a
public issue.
(xx) To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the
information and explanations given to us, we report that no fraud on or
by the Company has been noticed or reported, during the year.
For N. M. RAIJI & CO.
Chartered Accountants
Firm Registration No.108296W
J. M. GANDHI
Place : Mumbai Partner
Date : May 29, 2012 Membership No: 37924
Mar 31, 2010
1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of MIRC Electronics
Limited, as at March 31, 2010 and also the related Profit and Loss
Account and the Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date
annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the CompanyÃs management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on these financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with standards on auditing
generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (AuditorÃs Report) Order, 2003, as
amended by the Companies (AuditorÃs Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004
(hereinafter to be referred to as Ãthe OrderÃ) issued by the Central
Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of Section 227 of the
Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the
matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order, to the
extent applicable.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 3
above, we report that:
(i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit;
(ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of the
books;
(iii) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account;
(iv) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and
Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the
accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of
the Companies Act, 1956;
(v) On the basis of written representations received from the directors
as on March 31, 2010 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we
report that none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2010
from being appointed as a director in terms of Clause (g) of
sub-section (1) of Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;
(vi) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said financial statements together
with the notes thereon give the information required by the Companies
Act, 1956, in the manner so required and gives a true and fair view in
conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:
(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at March 31, 2010;
(b) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the Profit for the
year ended on that date and
(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the
year ended on that date.
ANNEXURETOTHEAUDITORS REPORT Referred to in paragraph 3 of the
Auditors report of even date of MIRC Electronics Limited for the year
ended March 31, 2010.
(i) a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars, including quantitative details and situation of its fixed
assets.
b) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has a regular programme of physical verification by which a
substantial portion of the fixed assets has been physically verified by
the management during the year. In our opinion, the frequency of
verification of the fixed assets by the management is reasonable having
regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. To the
best of our knowledge, no material discrepancies were noticed on
verification conducted during the year as compared with the book
records and the same have been appropriately dealt with in the books of
accounts.
c) The assets disposed off during the year are not significant and
therefore do not affect the going concern assumption.
(ii) a) Inventories have been physically verified by the Management
during the year. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is
reasonable.
b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the procedures for physical verification of the
inventories followed by the management were generally reasonable and
adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its
business.
c) In our opinion the Company is maintaining proper records of
inventory. The discrepancies noticed between the physical stocks and
the book stocks were not material and have been properly dealt with in
the books of account.
(iii) a) The Company has granted unsecured loan to four parties covered
in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act,
1956. The aggregate maximum amount during the year and outstanding
amount as at the balance sheet date of such loan both are Rs. 1362.25
lacs.
b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions on
which said loans have been granted are not, prima facie, prejudicial to
the interest of the Company.
c) As per the terms of the loan, principal amount is not due during the
year and interest is received as per the terms.
d) The Company has not taken any unsecured loan from parties covered in
the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, generally there are adequate internal control procedures
commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its
business with regard to purchase of inventory, fixed assets and for
sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, no major
weakness has been noticed in the internal control system.
(v) a) To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the
information and explanations given to us, we are of the opinion that
the particulars of contracts and arrangements that need to be entered
into the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act,
1956 have been properly entered in the said register.
b) During the year, there are transactions of purchase of materials and
services from two parties covered under Section 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956 and exceeding Rupees five lacs. As per the information and
explanation provided to us, the said purchases are made at prevailing
market prices except for purchases of special nature wherein
comparative prices of similar goods are not available. Also, there are
transactions of sale of spares and sale of services to two parties
covered under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 exceeding Rupees
five lacs. These are entered at prices which are reasonable having
regard to the prevailing market prices at the time of sale.
(vi) The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public, hence
the provision of Section 58A, 58AA or any other relevant provisions of
the Companies Act, 1956 and the rules framed there under are not
applicable.
(vii) In our opinion, the Company has adequate system of internal
audit, which is commensurate with its size and nature of its business.
(viii) We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the
Company pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government under
Section 209(1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 for maintenance of cost
records in respect of products manufactured and are of the opinion
that, prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been
maintained by the Company. We have, however, not made a detailed
examination of the records with a view to determine whether they are
accurate or complete.
(ix) a) According to the information and explanation provided to us,
during the year the Company is generally regular in depositing with
appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including amount of
provident fund, investor education and protection fund, employeesÃ
state insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, wealth-tax, customs duty,
excise-duty, service tax, cess and other material statutory dues,
applicable to it.
b) The following are the details of disputed Income-Tax, Excise Duty,
Customs Duty and Sales-Tax that have not been paid to the concerned
authorities.
Name of Statute Relevant Financial Year Forum where Dispute
is Pending
Income Tax 2007-08 Commissioner Income Tax (A)
Income Tax 2005-06 Commissioner Income Tax
Central Excise 1998-1999 High Court
Central Excise 1997-98, 1999-00, Commissioner Central Excise
2005-06, 2008-09
Central Excise 1999-00, 2001 to 2005 CESTAT
2005-06
Customs 1998-99, 2001-02 Commissioner Customs
Sales Tax 1991-92, 2000-01, High Court
2004-05, 2005-06
Sales Tax 1997-98 Board of Madhya Pradesh
Commercial Taxes, Bhopal
Sales Tax 1992-93, 1993-94, Commissioner of Sales Tax
1995-96 to 2006-07
Sales Tax 2007-08 Deputy Commissioner Sales Tax
Sales Tax 2005-06 ADC - Sales Tax
Sales Tax 2003-04, 2005-06 Revisional Board
Sales Tax 1996-97, 2001-02, Tribunal
2002-03, 2003-04
Sales Tax 1995-96, 1996-97, ACCT Appellate
1997-98, 1998-99,
2000-01, 2006-07
Sales Tax 1987-88, 2001-02 Joint Commissioner - Sales Tax
Name of Statue Unpaid Amount
(Rs. in Lacs)
Income Tax 224.88
Income Tax 69.27
Central Excise 62.44
Central Excise 416.97
Central Excise 226.41
Customs 37.71
Sales Tax 1064.15
Sales Tax 9.72
Sales Tax 193.98
Sales Tax 8.94
Sales Tax 65.07
Sales Tax 1185.80
Sales Tax 130.16
Sales Tax 490.13
Sales Tax 0.34
(x) The company does not have accumulated losses and has not incurred
cash losses during the financial year and immediately preceding
financial year.
(xi) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to financial
institutions, banks or debenture holders.
(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by
way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
(xiii) The Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/ mutual fund benefit
fund/ society. Therefore, the provisions of Clause 4(xiii) of the
Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the
Company.
(xiv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities and debentures.
However, it has dealings in Mutual Fund Units during the year. For the
transactions in Mutual fund units the Company has maintained proper
records and has made timely entries therein. All the shares, securities
and other investments are held by the Company in its own name.
(xv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the terms and conditions on which the Company has given
guarantee for loan taken by its subsidiary from bank is not, prima
facie, prejudicial to the interest of the Company.
(xvi) In our opinion and on the basis of the information and
explanations given to us, the term loans have been applied for the
purpose for which they were raised other than amounts temporarily
invested pending utilisation of the funds for the stated use.
(xvii) On the basis of our examination of the books of account and the
information and explanations given to us, we report that the funds
raised on short-term basis have not been used for long-term investment.
(xviii) During the year, the Company has not made any preferential
allotment of shares to parties and companies covered in the Register
maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(xix) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not issued any secured debentures, which are outstanding
during the year.
(xx) During the period covered by our audit report, the Company has not
raised any money by way of public issue.
(xxi) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
material fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during
the year.
For N.M. Raiji & Co.
Chartered Accountants
J. M. Gandhi
Partner
Place : Mumbai Membership No. 37924
Date : May 3, 2010
Firm Registration No.108296W
Disclaimer: This is 3rd Party content/feed, viewers are requested to use their discretion and conduct proper diligence before investing, GoodReturns does not take any liability on the genuineness and correctness of the information in this article