Mar 31, 2023
Rights, preferences and restrictions attached to equity shares
The Company has one class of equity shares having par value of ''1 per share (31st March 2022: ''1 per share). Each holder of equity shares is entitled to one vote per share. The Company declares and pays dividend in Indian rupees.
The Company has paid final dividend of '' 0.40 per equity share of face value ''1 each, which was declared during last year..
The Board of Directors at its Meeting held on 29 May 2023, has recommended a final dividend @ 75% i.e. ''0.75 per equity share. The dates of the book closure for the entitlement of such final dividend and Annual General Meeting shall be decided and informed in due course of time. In the event of liquidation of the Company, the share holders of equity shares will be entitled to receive remaining assets of the Company, after distribution of all preferential amounts. The distribution will be in proportion to the number of equity shares held by the share holders.
Nature and purpose of other equity1. Capital reserve :
The same has been created in accordance with provision of the Act on forfeiture of shares and debentures in past and is not available for distribution to owners.
2. Capital redemption reserve:
The same has been created on redemption of share capital and shall be utilised in accordance with provision of the Act.
Securities premium is used to record the premium received on issue of shares. It is utilised in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.
General reserve is created from time to time by way of transfer of profits from retained earnings for appropriation purpose.
Retained earnings are the accumulated profits earned by earned by the Company till date, as adjusted for distribution to owners.
Deferred tax assets are recognised for all deductible temporary differences, the carry forward of unused tax credits and any unused tax losses. Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary differences, and the carry forward of unused tax credits and unused tax losses can be utilised. The same is assessed every year basis business projections of taxable profits in future.
The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each reporting date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred tax asset to be utilised. Unrecognised deferred tax assets are re-assessed at each reporting date and are recognised to the extent that it has become probable that future taxable profits will allow the deferred tax asset to be recovered.
B Defined benefit plan GRATUITY
In accordance with The Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, the company provides for gratuity, as defined benefit plan. The gratuity plan provides for a lump sum payment to the employees at the time of separation from the service on completion of vested year of employment i.e. five years. The liability of gratuity plan is provided based on actuarial valuation as at the end of each financial year based on which the Company contributes the ascertained liability to Life Insurance Corporation of India and Indiafirst Life Insurance Company Limited with whom the plan assets are maintained.
* DHBVN had demanded t 5.60 crores (31 March 2022 : t 5.60 crores) for overdrawing power as compared to approved load limit. DHBVN filed a writ petition before Honâble High Court of Punjab and Haryana which was dismissed on account of nonprosecution on February 15, 2016. Thereafter, DHBVN filed case against the Company with divisional bench of Honourable High Court of Punjab and Haryana. The Company has deposited t 3.60 crores with DHBVN. The case is presently pending and next hearing on July 18, 2023.
(ii) The Company has given comfort letters to banks for funds raised by its subsidiary companies, namely Rico Jinfei Wheels Limited t 20.76 crores (31 March 2022 : t 26.25 crores)
(iii) The Company has given corporate Guarantee for the funds raised by its subsidiary company AAN Engineering Industries Limited t NIL (31 March 2022 : t 0.39 crores).
The Companyâs exposure arises mainly on import (of raw material and capital items), export (of finished goods) and foreign currency borrowings. The Company follows a policy of matching of import and export exposures (natural hedge) to reduce the net exposure in any foreign currency. Whenever the natural hedge is not available or is not fully covering the foreign currency exposure of the Company, management uses certain derivative instruments to manage its exposure to the foreign currency risk. Foreign currency transactions are managed within approved policy parameters. The Company uses forward contracts, cross currency swap and interest rate swaps to hedge its exposure to foreign currency and interest rate risk. Effective April 1,2019, these derivatives are designated as hedging instruments in respect of foreign currency risk and interest rate risk in cash flow hedges.
Hedge effectiveness is determined at the inception of the hedge relationship, and through periodic prospective effectiveness assessments to ensure that an economic relationship exists between the hedged item and hedging instrument. The economic relationship and hedge effectiveness are based on the qualitative factors and the use of a hypothetical derivative where appropriate. The Company has established a hedge ratio of 1:1 for the hedging relationships as the underlying risk and notional amount of the hedging instruments are identical to the hedged items.
The Companyâs principal financial liabilities, other than derivatives, comprise loans and borrowings, trade and other payables. The main purpose of these financial liabilities is to finance the Companyâs operations and to support its operations. The Companyâs principal financial assets other than derivatives comprise investments, loans given, trade and other receivables and cash and cash equivalents that derive directly from its operations. The Company also enters into foreign exchange derivative transactions.
The Company is exposed to market risk, credit risk and liquidity risk. The Companyâs senior management oversees the mitigation of these risks. The Companyâs financial risk activities are governed by appropriate policies and procedures and that financial risks are identified, measured and managed in accordance with the Companyâs policies and risk objectives. All derivative activities for risk management purposes are carried out by specialist teams that have the appropriate skills, experience and supervision. It is the Companyâs policy that no trading in foreign exchange derivatives for speculative purposes will be undertaken. The policies for managing each of these risks, which are summarized below:-
Market risk is the risk that future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market prices. Market risk comprises of two types of risks namely currency risk and interest rate risk. The objective of the market risk management is to manage and control market risk exposure within acceptable parameters while optimising the return. a. Foreign currency risk:
Foreign currency risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of an exposure will fluctuate because of changes in foreign exchange rates. The Companyâs exposure to the risk of changes in foreign exchange rates relates primarily to the Companyâs operating activities (when revenue or expense is denominated in a foreign currency), investments & borrowing in foreign currency, etc.
The Companyâs exposure arises mainly on import (of raw material and capital items), export (of finished goods) and foreign currency borrowings. The Company follows a policy of matching of import and export exposures (natural hedge) to reduce the net exposure in any foreign currency. Whenever the natural hedge is not available or is not fully covering the foreign currency exposure of the Company, management uses certain derivative instruments to manage its exposure to the foreign currency risk. Foreign currency transactions are managed within approved policy parameters.
Cash and cash equivalents and bank balances
Credit risk relating to cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash is considered negligible as counterparties are banks. The management considers the credit quality of deposits with such banks to be good and reviews the banking relationships on an on-going basis.
Trade receivables are unsecured in nature and are derived from revenue earned from customers. Trade receivable are non-interest bearing and are settled upto 30 to 180 days terms.
Credit risk is managed through credit approvals, establishing credit limits and continuously monitoring the credit worthiness of customers to whom the Company grants credit terms in the normal course of business. In accordance with Ind AS 109, the Company uses expected credit loss model to assess the impairment loss. The Company uses a provision matrix to compute the expected credit loss allowance of trade receivables. The provision matrix takes into account available external and internal credit risk factors such as default risk of industry, historical experience for customers, etc. However, the allowance for lifetime expected credit loss on customer balances for the year ended 31 March 2023 and 31 March 2022 is insignificant.
46 Business Combination (common control transaction with its wholly owned subsidiary company, Rico Investments Limited and step down subsidiary companies namely RASA Autocom Limited and Rico Aluminium and Ferrous Auto Components Limited.
The Board of Directors of the Company, based on the recommendation of Audit Committee, in its meeting held on 26 July 2021, have considered and approved the Scheme of Amalgamation (âSchemeâ) for merger of its subsidiary company namely M/s. Rico Investments Limited and step down subsidiary companies namely M/s. RASA Autocom Limited and M/s. Rico Aluminium and Ferrous Auto Components Limited (âTransferor Companiesâ) with the Company, pursuant to Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013, with effect from Appointed Date i.e. 01 April 2021. The Scheme was filed with National Company Law Tribunal (âNCLTâ) on 29 September 2021 and was approved by NCLT on 15 February 2023.
Pursuant to the Scheme, all the assets, liabilities, reserves and surplus of transferror companies have been vested in the Company with effect from 1 April 2021 at the carrying values in financial statements of transferor companies in accordance with IND AS 103.
The Company has established a comprehensive system of maintenance of information and documents as required by the transfer pricing legislation under sections 92-92F of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Since the law requires existence of such information and documentation to be contemporaneous in nature, the Company is in the process of updating the documentation of the international transactions entered into with the associated enterprises from 1 April 2022 and expects such records to be in existence before the due date of filing of income tax return. The management is of the opinion that its international transactions are at armâs length so that the aforesaid legislation will not have any impact on the Standalone Financial Statements, particularly on the amount of tax expense and that of provision for taxation.
The Company is engaged in the business of manufacturing and assembling of automotive components. The Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) evaluates the Companyâs performance and allocates resources based on an analysis of various performance indicators by industry classes. All operating segmentsâ operating results are reviewed regularly by CODM to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segments and assess their performance. CODM believes that these are governed by same set of risk and returns hence CODM reviews as one balance sheet component. Further, the economic environment in which the company operates is significantly similar and not subject to materially different risk and rewards.
The operating segment of the Company is identified to be âAutomotive componentsâ as the CODM reviews business performance at an overall Company level as one segment.
Accordingly, as the company operates in a single business and geographical segment, the reporting requirements for primary and secondary disclosures under Indian Accounting Standard - 108 Operating Segment have not been provided in the standalone financial statements.
The Companyâs capital management objectives are:
The capital structure of the Company consists of debt, cash and cash equivalents and equity attributable to equity shareholders of the Company which comprises issued share capital (including premium) and accumulated reserves disclosed in the Statement of Changes in Equity. The Companyâs capital management objective is to achieve an optimal weighted average cost of capital while continuing to safeguard the Companyâs ability to meet its liquidity requirements (including its commitments in respect of capital expenditure) and repay loans as they fall due. The Company manages its capital structure and makes adjustments in light of changes in economic conditions and the requirements of the financial covenants. To maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Company may adjust the dividend payment to shareholders, return capital to shareholders or issue new shares. The Company monitors capital using a gearing ratio, which is debt divided by total equity. The Companyâs policy is to keep an optimum gearing ratio. The Company includes within debt, interest bearing loans and borrowings.
52 Events after Balance sheet date
There are no reportable subsequent events after the balance sheet date.
53 Additional regulatory information not disclosed elsewhere in the financial information
(i) No proceeding has been initiated or pending against the Company for holding any benami property under the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 (45 of 1988) and rules made thereunder.
(ii) The Company has not been declared as wilful defaulter by any bank or financial Institution or other lender.
(iii) The Company has not entered into any transactions with companies struck off under section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013
or section 560 of Companies Act, 1956.
(iv) The Company (as per the provisions of the Core Investment Companies (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016) does not have more than one CIC (the same is not required to be registered with RBI as not being Systemically Important CIC ).
(v) The Company has not revalued its property, plant and equipment (including right-of-use assets) or intangible assets or both during the current or previous year.
(vi) The Company has not traded or invested in Crypto currency or Virtual Currency during the financial year.
(vii) The Company has not entered into any scheme of arrangement which has an accounting impact on current or previous financial year.
(viii) The Company has complied with the number of layers prescribed under the Companies Act, 2013.
(ix) The Company does not have any charge which is yet to be registered with ROC beyond the statutory period.
(x) The Company has not advanced or provided loan to or invested funds in any entities including foreign entities (Intermediaries)
or to any other persons, with the understanding that the intermediary shall:
i. directly or indirectly lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or on behalf of the Company (ultimate beneficiaries) or
ii. provide any guarantee, security or the like to or on behalf of the ultimate beneficiaries.
(xi) The Company has not received any fund from any persons or entities, including foreign entities (Funding Party) with the understanding (whether recorded in writing or otherwise) that the Company shall:
i. directly or indirectly lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or on behalf of the Funding Party (ultimate beneficiaries) or
ii. provide any guarantee, security or the like on behalf of the ultimate beneficiaries.
(xii) The Company has not undertaken any transaction which is not recorded in the books of accounts that has been surrendered or disclosed as income during the year in the tax assessments under the Income Tax Act, 1961 (such as, search or survey or any other relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961).
Mar 31, 2018
1. CORPORATE INFORMATION
Rico Auto Industries Limited (âthe Companyâ) was incorporated in India on March 07, 1983. The Company supplies a broad range of high-precision fully machined aluminum and ferrous components and assemblies to Original Equipment Manufacturers across the globe. Its integrated services include design, development, tooling, casting, machining, assembly and research and development across aluminum and ferrous products. The Company is in the business of manufacturing and sale of auto components for two wheelers and four wheelers
2. STANDARDS AND INTERPRETATIONS ISSUED BUT NOT EFFECTIVE
I n March 2018, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs issued the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Amendment Rules, 2018 via notification dated March 28, 2018 to further amend Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015, notifying a new revenue recognition standard Ind AS 115, âRevenue from Contracts with Customersâ. This amendment replaces Ind AS 18, âRevenueâ and Ind AS 11, âConstruction Contractsâ. An insertion to Appendix B, âForeign currency transaction and advance considerationâ to Ind AS 21, âThe effect of change in exchange rates has also been notified. The amendments are applicable to the Company from April 01, 2018.
Ind AS 115: âRevenue from Contracts with Customersâ
Ind AS 115 provides a single, principles based five-step model to be applied to all contracts with customers The five steps in the model are as follows:
a) Identify the contract(s) with the customer;
b) Identify the performance obligations in the contract;
c) Determine the transaction price;
d) Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contracts;
e) Recognise revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.
Insertion of Appendix B to Ind AS 21: âThe effect of changes in foreign exchange ratesâ
The amendment clarifies that, in determining the spot exchange rate to use on initial recognition of the related asset, expense or income (or part of it) on the derecognition of a non-monetary asset or non-monetary liability relating to advance consideration, the date of the transaction is the date on which an entity initially recognises the non-monetary asset or non-monetary liability arising from the advance consideration. If there are multiple payments or receipts in advance, then the entity must determine the transaction date for each payment or receipt of advance consideration.
Entities may apply the amendments on a fully retrospective basis. Alternatively, an entity may apply the Interpretation prospectively to all assets, expenses and income in its scope that are initially recognized on or after:
(i) The beginning of the reporting period in which the entity first applies the interpretation or
(ii) The beginning of a prior reporting period presented as comparative information in the financial statements of the reporting period in which the entity first applies the interpretation.
The Company has evaluated the requirements of the amendments and do not consider the impact on the financial statements to be material.
3. BASIS OF PREPERATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES.
3.1 Basis of preparation and presentation
i) Compliance with Ind AS
In accordance with the notification dated February 16, 2015, issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, the Company has adopted Indian Accounting Standards (referred to as âInd ASâ) notified under section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013 (âthe actâ) read with the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015 (as amended) and other relevant provisions of the act with effect from April 01, 2016.
These are the Companyâs first Ind AS financial statements. The date of transition to Ind AS is April 01, 2016. The mandatory exceptions and optional exemptions availed by the Company on First-time adoption have been detailed in Note 49.
Up to the year ended March 31, 2017, the Company had prepared the financial statements under the historical cost convention on accrual basis in accordance with the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles applicable in India, and the applicable Accounting Standards as prescribed under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 (âActâ), read with the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014 (âPrevious GAAPâ).
On adoption of Ind AS by the Company, the Company has adopted Ind AS and accordingly, the previous year figures in the financial statements have been restated in compliance to Ind AS and in accordance with Ind AS 101-âFirst Time adoption of Indian Accounting Standardsâ (Ind AS 101), the Company has presented a reconciliation of other equity under previous GAAP and Ind AS as at March 31, 2017, and April 01, 2016 and of the cash flow statement, profit after tax as per previous GAAP and total comprehensive income under Ind AS for the year ended March 31, 2017.
ii) Functional and presentation currency:
These financials are presented in Indian Rupees (INR), which is also the Companyâs functional currency.
iii) Going concern and basis measurement
The financial statements have been prepared on going concern basis under the historical cost convention on accrual basis except for certain financial assets and financial liabilities, defined benefit plans that are measured at fair values at the end of each reporting period.
All assets and liabilities have been classified as current or non-current as per the Companyâs operating cycle and other criteria set out in the Companies Act, 2013.
4. SIGNIFICANT ESTIMATES AND JUDGEMENTS
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with Ind AS requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amount of assets, liabilities, income, expenses and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of these financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses for the years presented. Actual results may differ from the estimates. Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed at each balance sheet date. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimates are revised and future periods affected. In particular, information about significant areas of estimation uncertainty and critical judgements in applying accounting policies that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognised in the financial statements are includes:
- measurement of defined benefit obligations;
- estimation of useful lives of property, plant and equipment;
- provision and contingent liabilities; and
- carrying values of inventories.
d) Description of the rights, preferences and restrictions attached to each class of shares
Equity shares : The Company has only one class of equity shares having a face value of Rs.1 per share. All the existing equity shares rank pari passu in all respects including but not limited to entitlement for dividend, bonus issue and rights issue. These equity shares are listed on the National Stock Exchange of India Limited and BSE Limited.
In the event of liquidation of the Company, the holder of equity shares will be entitled to receive remaining assets of the Company, after settling of all liabilities. The distribution will be in proportion to the number of equity shares held by the shareholders.
The above information is furnished as per the shareholders register as on March 31, 2018.
f) The Company has not issued bonus shares, equity shares issued for considerations other than cash and also no shares has been bought back during the period of five years immediately preceding the reporting period.
Description of reserves
a. Capital reserve
The same has been created in accordance with provision of the Act on forfeiture of shares and debentures in past and is not available for distribution to owners.
b. Capital redemption reserve
The same has been created on redemption of share capital and shall be utilised in accordance with provision of the Act.
c. Securities premium reserve
Securities premium reserve is used to record the premium on issue of shares. The reserve will be utilised in accordance with provisions of the Act.
d. Foreign currency monetary item translation difference
Exchange differences arising on long term foreign currency monetary items (long term loans) are accumulated in the âForeign Currency Monetary Item Translation Difference Accountâ and amortised over the remaining term of the loan.
e. General reserve
General reserve is created from time to time by way of transfer of profits from retained earnings for appropriation purpose.
* The management considers that the carrying amount of financial assets and financial liabilities recognised at amortised cost in the balance sheet approxiamtes their fair value.
B. Fair value hierarchy
The categories used are as follows:
Level 1: Quoted prices in an active market.
Level 2: I nputs other than the quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3: Discounted cash flow method is used to capture the present value of the expected future economic benefits that will flow to the company.
5. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
The capital structure of the Company consists of debt, cash and cash equivalents and equity attributable to equity shareholders of the Company which comprises issued share capital (including premium) and accumulated reserves disclosed in the Statement of Changes in Equity. The Companyâs capital management objective is to achieve an optimal weighted average cost of capital while continuing to safeguard the Companyâs ability to meet its liquidity requirements (including its commitments in respect of capital expenditure) and repay loans as they fall due. The Company manages its capital structure and makes adjustments in light of changes in economic conditions and the requirements of the financial covenants. To maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Company may adjust the dividend payment to shareholders, return capital to shareholders or issue new shares. The Company monitors capital using a gearing ratio, which is debt divided by total equity. The Companyâs policy is to keep an optimum gearing ratio. The Company includes within debt, interest bearing loans and borrowings.
* includes short term and long term borrowings with current maturities.
* includes equity share capital and other equity.
Note: The Company is in compliant with all the loan covenants on all the borrowings outstanding as on the financial statements date.
6. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT
6A. Market risk:
Market risk is the risk that future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market prices. Market risk comprises of two types of risk namely currency risk and interest rate risk. The objective of the market risk management is to manage and control market risk exposure within acceptable parameters while optimising the return.
a. Foreign currency risk:
The Companyâs exposure arises mainly on import (of raw material and capital items), export (of finished goods) and foreign currency borrowings. The Company follows a policy of matching of import and export exposures (natural hedge) to reduce the net exposure in any foreign currency. Whenever the natural hedge is not available or is not fully covering the foreign currency exposure of the Company, management uses certain derivative instruments to manage its exposure to the foreign currency risk. Foreign currency transactions are managed within approved policy parameters.
(i) Particulars of unhedged foreign exposure as at the reporting date
The Company exposure to foreign currency risk at the end of the reporting period expressed in INR are as follows:
6B. Credit risk:
Credit risk refers to the risk of default on its obligation by the customer/counter party resulting in a financial loss. The Groupâs exposure to credit risk is limited to the carrying amount of financial assets recognised at the date of the balance sheet, as summarised below:
Cash and cash equivalents and bank balances
Credit risk relating to cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash is considered negligible as counterparties are banks. The management considers the credit quality of deposits with such banks to be good and reviews the banking relationships on an on-going basis. Investments include investment in liquid mutual fund units having low credit risk.
Trade Receivables
Trade receivables are unsecured in nature and are derived from revenue earned from customers. Credit risk is managed through credit approvals, establishing credit limits and continuously monitoring the credit worthiness of customers to whom the Company grants credit terms in the normal course of business. On account of adoption of Ind AS 109, the Company uses expected credit loss model to assess the impairment loss. The Company uses a provision matrix to compute the expected credit loss allowance of trade receivables. The provision matrix takes into account available external and internal credit risk factors such as default risk of industry, historical experience for customers, etc. However, the allowance for lifetime expected credit loss on customer balances for the year ended March 31, 2018 and March 31, 2017 is insignifant. Top five customers for the year ended March 31, 2018 constitutes 65.37% of net trade receivables (March 31, 2017: 63.29% March 31, 2016: 67.23% ).
Other financial assets measured at amortised cost
Other financial assets measured at amortised cost includes loans and advances to related parties and employees, security deposits and others. Credit risk related to these other financial assets is managed by monitoring the recoverability of such amounts continuously. Given below is the ageing of trade receivable and loans:
6C. Liquidity Risk:
The Company manages liquidity risk by maintaining adequate reserves and banking facilities, by continuously monitoring forecast and actual cash flows and by matching the maturity profiles of financial assets and liabilities for the Company. The Company has established an appropriate liquidity risk management framework for itâs short term, medium term and long term funding requirement.
The below tables summarise the maturity profile of the Companyâs financial assets and financial liabilities:
A3. Others
Surety bonds executed in favour of the President of India, under Export Promotion Capital Goods Scheme (EPCG) for importing capital goods at concessional rate of custom duty. Amount of custom duty involved is Rs. 4.28 crores (March 31, 2017: Rs. 4.28 crores and April 01, 2016: Rs. 4.28 crores).
B. Defined benefit plan GRATUITY
I n accordance with the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, the Company provides for gratuity, as defined benefit plan. The gratuity plan provides for a lump sum payment to the employees at the time of separation from the service on completion of vested year of employment i.e. five years. The liability of gratuity plan is provided based on actuarial valuation as at the end of each financial year based on which the Company contributes the ascertained liability to Life Insurance Corporation of India with whom the plan assets are maintained.
B6. Sensitivity analysis for gratuity liability
Significant Actuarial Assumptions for the determination of the defined benefit obligation are discount rate, expected salary increase and employee turnover. The sensitivity analysis below, have been determined based on reasonably possible changes of the assumptions occurring at end of the reporting period, while holding all other assumptions constant. The result of Sensitivity analysis is given below:
7. The Companyâs operating lease payments pertains to premises taken on lease for operating activities. Aggregate rental expenses under operating leases amounted to Rs. 1.85 crores (March 31, 2017: Rs. 2.20 crores and April 01, 2016: Rs. 1.07 crores) for the year, has been charged to the statement of profit and loss.
8. RELATED PARTY DISCLOSURES
I. Related parties
A. Subsidiaries A1. Indian
i. AAN Engineering Industries Limited
ii. Rico Investments Limited*
iii. Rico Aluminium and Ferrous Auto components (step down subsidiary)
iv. Rasa Autocom Limited (step down subsidiary)
v. Rico Jinfei Wheels Limited (step down subsidiary)
vi. Uttarakhand Automotives Limited***
A2. Foreign
i. Rico Auto Industries Inc. (USA)
ii. Rico Auto Industries (UK) Limited, UK
B. Joint Venture
Magna Rico Powertrain Private Limited
C. Other Related Parties (Entity in which KMP exercise significant influence)
i. Kapsons Associates Investments Private Limited
ii. Higain Investments Private Limited
iii. Magpie Finvest Advisors Private Limited vi. Octan Media Limited
v. ASN Properties Private Limited
vi. Rico Castings Limited
vii. T.K. Precision Private Limited
viii. Kapbros Engineering Industries Limited
ix. Haridwar Estates Private Limited
x. Ishwara Manufacturing Services Private Limited
D. Key management personnel
i. Shri Arvind Kapur -Chairman, CEO & Managing Director
ii. Shri Arun Kapur - Joint Managing Director
iii. Shri Rakesh Kapur - Non Executive Director
vi. Smt. Upasna Kapur - Non Executive Director
v. Shri Amarjit Chopra - Independent Director
vi. Shri Satish Sekhri - Independent Director
vii. Shri Ashok Seth - Independent Director
viii. Shri Kanwal Monga - Independent Director
ix. Shri Rajeev Kapoor - Independent Director
x. Shri Vinod Kumar Nagar - Independent Director
xi. Shri Sanjay Syal- Chief Financial Officer (upto February 7, 2017) *
xii. Shri Rakesh Kumar Sharma - Chief Financial Officer (from August 04, 2017) *
xiii. Shri B.M Jhamb- Company Secretary*
* as per the Companies Act 2013
* Amounts have been rounded off to zero
** As the liabilities for the gratuity and compensated absence are provided on an actuarial basis for the Company as a whole rather than each individual employee, the amounts pertaining specifically to KMP are not known and hence, not included in the above table. Gratuity and compensated absence, are included based on actual payment in respective year based in the above table.
*** Amalgamated with the Company as per the Order dated 09/01/2018 passed by the Honâble NCL T, Chandigarh.
Note: In respect of details of personal guarantee given by promoters or directors, refer Note 16 Note: The above transactions are in the ordinary course of business.
9. The Company has opted to provide segment information in its consolidated financial statement in accordance with Ind AS 108 - Operating Segments.
10. In accordance with Accounting Standard 11 (under previous GAAP) âThe effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Ratesâ, the Company had chosen to avail the option to capitalise exchange differences arising on long term foreign currency monetary items to the cost of the relevant fixed assets and amortising it over the remaining useful life of the fixed assets. The Company has elected to continue with this accounting treatment as per option given in para D13AA of Ind AS 101 (refer note 49 for details). Amount remaining to be amortised is as under:
11. As per the transfer pricing norms applicable in India, the Company is required to use certain specified methods in computing armâs length price of transactions between the associated enterprises and maintain prescribed information and documents related to such transactions. The appropriate method to be adopted will depend on the nature of the transactions/class of transactions, class of associated persons, functions performed and other factors, which have been prescribed. The Company is in the process of updating the transfer pricing study for the current financial period. However, in the opinion of the management the same would not have a material impact on these financial statements.
12. During the current year, the Honâable National Company Law Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench vide its Order dated December, 2017 (received on January 09, 2018) has approved the Schemes of Amalgamation (the âUAL Schemeâ) which inter alia includes the amalgamation of a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company namely Uttarakhand Automotive Limited (âUALâ). The appointed date is April 01, 2015. The same has been accounted for using the âpooling of interestâ method (in accordance with the approved scheme) and also the guidance mentioned under Appendix C of Ind AS 103, Business Combinations. Consequently, the Company has recorded an adjustment amounting to Rs.0.34 crore in the retained earnings as on the April 01, 2016, being the earliest period presented.
13. Exceptional items for the current year and previous year include expenditure incurred pursuant to Voluntary Retirement Scheme of the Company amounting to Rs.6.80 crores and Rs.0.66 crore respectively.
14. Corporate social responsibility
As per Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013, a CSR committee has been formed by the Company. The areas of CSR activities are promoting education among children. The funds were primarily allocated and utilised for the activities that are specified in Schedule VII of the Companies Act, 2013.
a) Gross amount required to be spent by the Company during the year is Nil.
b) Amount spent during the year on:
15. FIRST-TIME ADOPTION OF Ind AS
These are the first financial statements prepared in accordance with Ind AS by the Company.
The accounting policies and other principles set out in Note 2 and 3 have been applied in preparing financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2018, the comparative information presented in these financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2017 and in preparation of an opening Ind AS balance sheet at April 01, 2016 (the transition date). In preparing its opening Ind AS balance sheet , the Company has adjusted the amounts reported previously in financial statements prepared in accordance with the accounting standards notified under Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2006(as amended) and other relevant provisions of the act (previous GAAP or Indian GAAP).
An explanation of how the transition from previous GAAP to Ind AS has affected the Companyâs financial position, financial performance and cash flows is set out in following tables and notes.
A. Exemptions and exceptions availed
Set out below are the applicable Ind AS 101 optional exemptions and mandatory exceptions applied in the transition from previous GAAP to Ind AS.
A1. Ind AS optional exemptions A1.1 Deemed cost
I nd AS 101 permits a first time adopter to elect to continue with the carrying value for all of its property plants and equipment as recognised in the financial statements as the date of transition to Ind AS, measured as per the previous GAAP and use that as its deemed cost as at the date of transition. This exemption can also used for intangible assets covered by Ind AS 38 Intangible Assets.
Accordingly, the Company has elected to measure all of its property, plant and equipment, intangible assets at their previous GAAP carrying value.
A1.2 Long term foreign currency monetry items
The Company has elected to continue policy adopted for accounting for exchange differences arising from translation of long-term foreign monetry item recognised in financial statement for period ending immediately before beginning of first Ind AS financial reporting period as per previous GAAP i.e., April 01, 2017.
A1.3 Investment in subsidiaries/ Joint venture/ Assocoates
As per Ind AS 101 , If a first-time adopter measures such an investment at cost in accordance with Ind AS 27, it shall measure that investment at one of the following amounts in its separate opening Ind AS Balance Sheet:
(a) cost determined in accordance with Ind AS 27; or
(b) deemed cost, the deemed cost of such an investment shall be its:
(i) fair value at the entityâs date of transition to Ind AS in its separate financial statements; or
(ii) previous GAAP carrying amount at that date
Accordingly, the company has availed the exemption and has measured these investments at previous GAAP carrying amounts at the transition date.
A2. Ind AS mandatory exceptions A.2.1 Estimates
An entityâs estimates in accordance with Ind ASâs at the date of transition to Ind AS shall be consistent with estimates made for the same date in accordance with previous GAAP (after adjustments to reflect any difference in accounting policies), unless there is objective evidence that those estimate were in error.
There is no such estimate which is changed while applying Ind AS. All the estimates as per previous GAAP is carried forward as in Ind AS transition balance sheet as at April 01, 2016.
Further, The Company made estimates for following items in accordance with Ind AS at the date of transition as these were not required under previous GAAP:
- Investment in equity instruments carried at FVTPL or FVOCI;
- Investment in debt instruments carried at amortised cost; and
- Impairment of financial assets based on expected credit loss model.
A.2.2 Classification and measurement of financial assets
Ind AS 101 requires an entity to assess classification of financial assets on the basis of facts and circumstances existing as on the date of transition. Further, the standard permits measurement of financial assets accumulated at amortised cost based on facts and circumstances at the date of transition if retrospective application is impracticable.
Accordingly, the Company has determined the classification of financial assets based on facts and circumstances that exist on the date of transition.
B.7 Notes to Ind AS 101 - First time Adoption of Indian Accounting Standards reconciliation
a. Measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities at amortised cost: Under Previous GAAP, all assets and liabilities that are now classified under the head financial assets and financial liabilities were carried at cost.
Under Ind AS, certain financial assets and financial liabilities are subsequently measured at amortised cost which involves the application of effective interest rate method (EIR). In applying the effective interest method, an entity identifies fees that are an integral part of the effective interest rate of a financial instrument. The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments or receipts through the expected life of the financial asset or financial liability to the gross carrying amount of the financial asset or financial liability.
b. Fair valuation of investments in mutual fund (fair value through profit and loss account): Under the previous GAAP, long term investments were measured at cost less diminution in value . Under the Ind AS, investments in mutual fund are measured at fair value as at the transition date, the Company has made irrevocable choice to account for these investments at fair value through profit and loss (FVTPL).
c. Prior period items: Under previous GAAP, prior period items were reflected as part of current year expense or income in the statement of profit and loss. Under Ind AS, the prior period items are adjusted to the period to which they relate and these are adjusted against opening equity of the earliest period presented.
d. Proposed dividend: Under the previous GAAP, dividends proposed by the board of directors after the balance sheet date but before the approval of the financial statements were considered as adjusting events. Accordingly, provision for proposed dividend was recognised as a liability. Under Ind AS, such dividends are recognised when the same is approved by the shareholders in the general meeting. Accordingly, the liability for proposed dividend included under provisions has been reversed with corresponding adjustment to retained earnings.
e. Merger of Uttarakhand Aoutomotives Limited (UAL): Effect of retrospective application of Ind AS 103- Business Combinations for UAL merger affected from April 01, 2015. (refer Note 46)
f. Government Grant (EPCG): Under the previous GAAP, EPCG benefit were not considered as government grant. Under Ind AS, EPCG benefits are considered as government grant thus EPCG benefit has been considered as Deferred revenue under other liabilities and a equivalent portion has been added up to the gross block of plant and machinery. The deferred revenue is being amortised over the life of the assets considering the benefits of grant to be over the life of the asset.
g. Re-measurement gains on defined benefit plans: Under Ind AS, Remeasurements i.e. actuarial gains and losses and the return on plan assets, excluding amounts included in the net interest expense on the net defined liability, are recognised in other comprehensive income instead of profit and loss in previous GAAP.
h. Excise duty: Under previous GAAP, excise duty and certain sales related obligations had been netted off with income from sale of tyres, tubes and flaps, however under Ind AS, these items have been shown under expenses.
i. Deferred Tax: Under Ind AS, deferred tax has been recalculated in respect of above changes and the deferred tax impact as at the transition date has been recognised in opening reserves and for the year ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2018 has been recognised in the Statement of profit and loss.
16. RECONCILIATION OF LIABILITIES FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Amendment to Ind AS 7 Satatement of cashflows, which require the entities to provide disclosures that enable users of financial statements to evaluate changes in liabilities arising from financing activities, including both change sarising from cash flows and non cash changes,suggesting inclusion of a reconciliation between the opening and closing balances in the Balance Sheet for liabilities arising from financing activities, to meet the disclosure requirements.The adoption of the amendment did not have any material impact on the financial statements, accordingly, the reconciliation is not disclosed.
17. EVENTS AFTER THE BALANCE SHEET DATE
The Board of Directors have recommended a final dividend of Rs.0.40 per share amounting to Rs.5.41 crores on equity Shares of Rs.1/- each for the year, subject to approval from shareholders. Dividend distribution tax on the same amounts to Rs.1.10 crores.
18. Revenue of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2018 is net of Goods and Service Tax (GST) which is applicable to the Company from July 01, 2017, however, revenue for the period upto June 30, 2017 is net of Value added taxes but gross of excise duty. Accordingly, revenue for the period ended March 31, 2018 is not comparable with the previous year presented in these financial statements. Similarly expenses are also not comparable.
19. Previous yearâs figures have been regrouped / reclassified, where necessary, to confirm to this yearâs classification.
20. The financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2018 were authorised and approved for issue by the Board of Directors on May 25, 2018.
Mar 31, 2017
Note 1 - CORPORATE INFORMATION
Rico Auto Industries Limited was incorporated in India on March 7, 1983. Rico supplies a broad range of high-precision fully machined aluminum and ferrous components and assemblies to Original Equipment Manufacturers across the globe. Its integrated services include design, development, tooling, casting, machining, assembly and research and development across aluminium and ferrous products. The Company is in the business of manufacturing and sale of auto components for two wheelers and four wheelers.
Note 2 - CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
I) Demand against the Company not acknowledged as liability
Income tax cases
a. Income tax department has raised demand for Rs. 0.02 crores (previous year Rs. 0.07 crores). This is on account of filing of incorrect particulars regarding challans deposited as compared to deposited for the year up to 2011-12. The liability has reduced after correct submission of particulars in revised challans.
Sales tax cases
a. A demand was raised under Haryana VAT Act 2003 for denial of input credit availed on purchase of furnace oil. The demand was confirmed by Joint Commissioner (Range) for Rs. 0.04 crores (previous year Rs. 0.04 crores). An appeal was filed with Haryana Sales Tax Tribunal on February 23, 2013. The Tribunal had remanded the case back to Joint Commissioner, Gurgaon. The Joint Commissioner has passed an adverse order against the Company. The Company has again appealed against the order of Joint Commissioner with the Haryana Sales Tax Tribunal.
b. A demand was raised under Haryana VAT Act 2003 for denial of input credit availed on purchase of furnace oil. The order passed by the Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Rewari for Rs. 0.22 crores (previous year Rs. 0.22 crores). The Tribunal had remanded the case back to Assessing Authority. The Assessing Authority has passed an adverse order against the Company. The Company has again appealed against the order of the Assessing Authority.
Excise and service tax cases
a. A show cause notice was issued by the Commissioner on removal of dies for job work without payment of duty. Commissioner passed the order on September 15, 2008 demanding excise duty of Rs. 0.75 crores, penalty of equal amount, interest at the applicable rate and a fine in lieu of confiscation of Rs. 0.10 crores on the dies released provisionally. Further, Company has also furnished a bond of Rs. 0.42 crores and a bank guarantee of Rs. 0.004 crores. A stay application was filed before the CESTAT. Total amount involved is Rs. 2.96 crores (previous year Rs. 2.84 crores). Current year movement represents interest.
b. A show cause notice was received from the Joint Commissioner of Central Excise towards cenvat credit availed on custom house agent and courier export related services during previous years 2004-05 to 2007-08. The Commissioner has confirmed the demand against which the Company filed an appeal before CESTAT. CESTAT ordered pre deposition of Rs. 0.24 crores. The amount involved was Rs. 1.55 crores. During the year, the Company has received an order from CESTAT in its favour.
c. A show cause notice was received from Additional Commissioner of Central Excise on availment of cenvat on construction and other repair and maintenance service during previous years 2005-06 to 2010-11. Commissioner of Central Excise confirmed the demand against which the Company filed an appeal before the CESTAT on June 29, 2012. CESTAT has granted an unconditional stay on February 19, 2013. Matter is pending for final decision before the Tribunal. Amount involved is Rs. 2.36 crores (previous year Rs. 2.27 crores). Current year movement represents interest.
d. Department has issued a show cause notice dated January 17, 2011 in respect of claim of cenvat on insurance, catering, tent house and taxi & travels for the period 2010-11. Joint commissioner has confirmed the demand against reply filed. An appeal was filed before the commissioner of central excise (appeals) Delhi-III, Gurgaon on January 31, 2012. Commissioner (Appeals) in its order dated January 21, 2013 decided the appeal in favour of Company on May 7, 2013. The department has filed an appeal before Tribunal against said order. The amount involved was Rs. 0.45 crores. During the year, the Company has received an order from CESTAT in its favour.
e. Department has issued a show cause notice received from Joint Commissioner of Central Excise dated October 08, 2008 in respect of claim of cenvat on insurance, catering, tent house and taxi & travels for the period 2004-05 to 2007-08. Demand was confirmed by Additional Commissioner, against reply filed. Appeal filed before the Commissioner of central excise (appeals) Delhi-III, Gurgaon on March 21, 2014. The amount involved was Rs. 1.37 crores. During the year, the Company has received an order from CESTAT in its favour.
f. Department has issued a show cause notice dated April 17, 2009 in respect of claim of cenvat on insurance, catering, tent house and taxi & travels for the period 2008-09. On January 30, 2014, Additional Commissioner has confirmed the demand against the reply filed. Appeal filed before the Commissioner of central excise (appeals) Delhi-III, Gurgaon on March 21, 2014. The amount involved was Rs. 0.20 crores. During the year, the Company has received an order from CESTAT in its favour.
g. Department has issued a show cause notice dated February 18, 2010 in respect of claim of cenvat on insurance, catering, tent house and taxi & travels for the period February, 2009 to December, 2010 . On January 30, 2014, Additional Commissioner has confirmed the demand against the reply filed. Appeal filed before the commissioner of central excise (appeals) Delhi-III, Gurgaon on March 21, 2014. The amount involved was Rs. 0.31 crores. During the year, the Company has received an order from CESTAT in its favour.
h. Department has issued a show cause notice dated December 27, 2011 in respect of claim of cenvat on insurance, catering, tent house and taxi & travels for the period January 2011 to November 2011. On January 30, 2014, Additional Commissioner has confirmed the demand against the reply filed. Appeal filed before the commissioner of central excise (appeals) Delhi-III, Gurgaon on March 21, 2014. The amount involved was Rs. 0.02 crores. During the year, the Company has received an order from CESTAT in its favour.
i. Department has issued a show cause notice dated December 31, 2012 in respect of claim of cenvat on insurance, catering, tent house and taxi & travels for the period December 2011 to November 2012. On January 30, 2014, Additional Commissioner has confirmed the demand against the reply filed. Appeal filed before the commissioner of central excise (appeals) Delhi-III, Gurgaon on March 21, 2014. The amount involved was Rs. 0.79 Crores. During the year, the Company has received an order from CESTAT in its favour.
j. A show cause notice has been received from the Additional Commissioner of Central Excise towards Cenvat availed on outward freight during 2005-06 and 2006-07. The Joint Commissioner confirmed the demand against which the Company appealed before CESTAT. The Tribunal remanded back the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) and it is pending before it. Amount involved is Rs. 0.27 Crores (previous year Rs. 0.26 crores). Current year movement represents interest.
k. A show cause notice has been received from commissioner of central excise to deposit inadmissible cenvat credit availed on the capital goods destroyed in fire. The demand has been confirmed by Additional Commissioner against which the Company appealed before the Commissioner (Appeals) of Central Excise. Amount involved is Rs. 1.69 crore (Previous year Rs. 1.64 Crores). Current year movement represents interest.
Others
a. Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam (DHBVN) had demanded Rs. 5.60 crores (previous year Rs. 5.60 crores) for overdrawing power as compared to approved load limit. DHBVN filed a writ petition before Honorable High Court of Punjab and Haryana which was dismissed on account of non-prosecution on February 15, 2016. DHBVN filed an appeal before double judge bench and the next hearing was scheduled on November 23, 2016. Further, the next hearing date was set on August 21, 2017. The Company has deposited Rs. 3.60 crores during the financial year 2011-12 which is disclosed in Note 21 -âShort term loans and advancesâ under sub head âOthersâ.
b. A demand was raised under Haryana Local Area Development Tax Act, 2000 for tax on central purchase of certain items. An appeal was filed before with Joint Commissioner (Appeal) and the amount involved is Rs. 0.01 crores (Previous year Rs. 0.01 crores).
II) Guarantees
a) On behalf of subsidiary companies:
The Company has given corporate guarantees to the bankers for the loan taken by following step down subsidiary company:
The outstanding amount as on March 31, 2017 of the above mentioned loan as per the books of accounts of Rasa Autocom Limited is Nil (previous year Rs. 0.54 crores).
III) Others
Surety bonds executed in favour of the President of India, under Export Promotion Capital Goods Scheme (EPCG) for importing capital goods at concessional rate of custom duty, amounting to Rs. 4.66 crores (previous year Rs. 4.66 crores). Amount of custom duty involved is Rs. 4.28 crores (previous year Rs. 4.28 crores)
Note 44 - The Companyâs operating lease payments pertains to premises taken on lease for operating activities. Aggregate rental expenses under operating leases amounted to Rs. 2.20 crores (previous year Rs. 1.07 crores) for the year, has been charged to the statement of profit and loss.
* A Subsidiary Company namely Rico Investments Limited has been incorporated on January 7, 2015. Rico Investments Limited is a Core Investment Company (CIC), incorporated for the purpose of acquiring and holding strategic Investments in the Group Companies of Rico Auto Industries Limited. The Company holds investment in three subsidiaries, namely Rasa Autocom Limited, Rico Jinfei Wheels Limited and Rico Aluminium and Ferrous Auto components Limited (formerly known as RAA Autocom Limited).
B. Key management personnel
Details of key managerial personnel are as under:
i) Shri Arvind Kapur - Chairman, CEO & Managing Director
ii) Shri Arun Kapur - Joint Managing Director
iii) Shri Sanjay Syal - Chief Financial Officer (upto February 7, 2017)*
iv) Shri B.M jhamb - Company Secretary*
* as per the Companies Act 2013
Note 3 - Segment information as required under AS-17 âSegment Reportingâ, has been provided in the consolidated financial statements of the Company and therefore no separate disclosure on segment information is given in these standalone financial statements
Note 4 - In accordance with Accounting Standard 11 âThe effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Ratesâ, the Company has chosen to avail the option to capitalise exchange differences arising on long term foreign currency monetary items to the cost of the relevant fixed assets and amortising it over the remaining useful life of the fixed assets. Amount remaining to be amortised is as under:
Note 5 - As per the transfer pricing norms applicable in India, the Company is required to use certain specified methods in computing armâs length price of transactions between the associated enterprises and maintain prescribed information and documents related to such transactions. The appropriate method to be adopted will depend on the nature of the transactions/class of transactions, class of associated persons, functions performed and other factors, which have been prescribed. The Company is in the process of conducting a transfer pricing study for the current financial period. However, in the opinion of the management the same would not have a material impact on these financial statements. Accordingly, these financial statements do not include any adjustments for the transfer pricing implications, if any.
Note 6 - The scheme of Amalgamation of Uttarakhand Automotives Limited, Wholly Owned Subsidiary with its Holding Company Rico Auto Industries Limited as approved by the shareholders on January 30, 2017 has been filed with the Honâble High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. Consequent to the amendment in the Companies Act, 2013, the matter has been transferred to National Company Law Tribunal, Chandigarh (NCLT). The next date of hearing fixed for the said matter is July 11, 2017.
Note 7 - Exceptional items for the current year and previous year include expenditure incurred pursuant to Voluntary Retirement Scheme of the Company amounting to Rs. 0.66 crores and Rs. 2.85 crores respectively.
Note 8 - CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
As per Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013, a CSR committee has been formed by the Company. The areas of CSR activities are promoting education among children. The funds were primarily allocated and utilised for the activities that are specified in Schedule VII of the Companies Act, 2013.
a) Gross amount required to be spent by the Company during the year is Nil.
b) Amount spent during the year on:
Note 9 - Prior period tax represents net impact of write back of excess provisions of earlier years amounting to Rs.0.52 Crores and additional provision created for demand pertaining to earlier years which has been received during the year amounting to Rs.0.19 Crores.
Note 10 - Disclosure on Specified Bank Notes (SBNs)
Disclosure in respect of Specified Bank Notes (SBN) as specified by Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) vide notification no. G.S.R. 308(e) dated March 30, 2017 is given below:
Note 11 - Previous yearâs amounts have been regrouped/ reclassified, wherever considered necessary to make them comparable with those of the current year.
This is the summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information referred to in our report of even date.
Mar 31, 2016
Note 1 - Segment information as required under AS-17 âSegment Reportingâ, has been provided in the consolidated financial statements of the Company and therefore no separate disclosure on segment information is given in these standalone financial statements.
Note 2 - In accordance with Accounting Standard 11 âThe effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Ratesâ, the Company has chosen to avail the option to capitalize exchange differences arising on long term foreign currency monetary items to the cost of the relevant fixed assets and amortizing it over the remaining useful life of the fixed assets. Amount remaining to be amortized is as under:
Note 3 - As per the transfer pricing norms applicable in India, the Company is required to use certain specified methods in computing armâs length price of transactions between the associated enterprises and maintain prescribed information and documents related to such transactions. The appropriate method to be adopted will depend on the nature of the transactions/class of transactions, class of associated persons, functions performed and other factors, which have been prescribed. The Company is in the process of conducting a transfer pricing study for the current financial period. However, in the opinion of the management the same would not have a material impact on these financial statements. Accordingly, these financial statements do not include any adjustments for the transfer pricing implications, if any.
Note 4 - On March 14, 2016, the Company submitted an application along with the draft Scheme of Amalgamation of Uttarakhand Automotives Limited, wholly owned subsidiary with its Holding Company Rico Auto Industries Limited, as required by Regulation 37 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 to BSE Limited and National Stock Exchange of India Limited. Once approved, Company will proceed to file the petition before the Honâble High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.
Note 5 - During the year ended March 31, 2015, the Company completed the sale of all of its shares in the Joint Venture, FCC Rico Limited, a joint venture between the Company and FCC Co. Ltd., Japan for a total gross consideration of Rs.495.00 crores to FCC Co. Ltd., Japan and/or its affiliates. The transaction was carried out at armâs length based on valuation performed by the valuation expert. Consequently, upon disposal, income and expenses are recorded up to the date of disposal and all assets and liabilities are derecognized from the consolidated financial statements.
Note 6 - During the year ended March 31 2015, the Company had carried out a comprehensive review of its business activities/investment in subsidiaries and has identified certain businesses undergoing continuing pressure. In order to turnaround these business divisions, the management has, with a strategic view and bring in more focused attention on these businesses, decided to restructure its business activities to ensure optimize operational efficiency and consequently maximize the shareholdersâ value. As part of the restructuring, the Company:
A. Sold its (i) Ferrous based Auto Components Business Division located at Gurgaon and Manesar (Haryana) (âFerrous Undertakingâ) and (ii) Non-ferrous based Auto Components Business Division located at Sanand (Non-ferrous undertaking) (collectively may be referred as âUndertakingâ); to its one of the Subsidiary Companies namely Rico Aluminium and Ferrous Auto Components Limited âRAFAâ (formerly known as RAA Autocom Limited) as going concern on a slump sale basis and on armâs length. The lump sum sale consideration for Ferrous and Non-ferrous Undertaking is Rs.39.59 crores and Rs.4.81 crores respectively, which has been arrived at without values being assigned at individual assets and liabilities, was received by the Company. Consequently, loss of Rs.173.62 crores had been recorded under exceptional items.
B. Sold investments in Subsidiaries namely RAFA , Rasa Autocom Limited and Rico Jinfei Wheels Limited for an aggregate consideration of Rs.1.50 crores to another Subsidiary Company namely Rico Investments Limited incorporated for the purpose of holding the investment in the Group Companies as a Core Investment Company. The aforesaid consideration has been determined on armâs length based on valuation report of an Independent Valuer. Consequently, loss of Rs.49.07 crores had been recorded under exceptional items.
Note 7 - Exceptional items for the current year include expenditure incurred pursuant to Voluntary Retirement Scheme of the Company amounting to Rs.2.85 crores.
Previous year exceptional items included:
a. Sale of shares in the Joint Venture, FCC Rico Limited:
Consequent to the sale of all shares held by the company in the joint venture for a total gross consideration of Rs.495.00 crores, the company had recorded a gain of Rs.491.05 crores. Further, legal and professional expenses of Rs.4.42 crores were incurred in relation to sale of investment in FCC Rico Limited, have been netted from the sale consideration.
b. Loss on sale of business divisions:
As detailed in Note 52A above, the Company had sold its (a) Ferrous Undertaking and (b) Non- Ferrous based auto components business division on a going concern basis and had recorded a loss of Rs.173.62 crores.
c. Loss on sale of investments in subsidiaries:
As detailed in Note 52B above, the Company had sold its investment in RAFA (formerly known as RAA Autocom Limited), Rasa Autocom Limited and Rico Jinfei Wheels Limited and had recorded a loss of Rs.49.07 crores.
d. Loss on diminution in the value of loans and advances:
The Company entered into settlement agreement with RAFA (formerly known as RAA Autocom Limited), Uttarakhand Automotives Limited, Rico Jinfei Wheels Limited and Rasa Autocom Limited for recovery of loans aggregating to Rs.100.19 crores given by the company over the past few years. As per the settlement agreement, out of Rs.100.19 crores, an aggregate of Rs.30.49 crores, representing interest accrued on such loans and Rs.8.67 crores of the loan balance recoverable from Uttarakhand Automotives Limited has been written off.
e. Other items:
Expenditure incurred pursuant to Voluntary Retirement Scheme of the company amounting to Rs.2.58 crores and Land written off amounting to Rs.1.26 crores.
Note 8 - Corporate Social Responsibility
As per Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013, a CSR committee has been formed by the Company. The areas of CSR activities are promoting education among children. The funds were primarily allocated and utilized for the activities which are specified in Schedule VII of the Companies Act, 2013.
a) Gross amount required to be spent by the Company during the year is Nil.
b) Amount spent during the year on :
Note 9 - Prior period tax represents depreciation adjustment between current tax and deferred tax.
Note 10 - Previous yearâs amounts have been regrouped/ reclassified, wherever considered necessary to make them comparable with those of the current year.
This is the summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information referred to in our report of even date.
Mar 31, 2015
A. Income tax department has raised demand for Rs. 0.18 crores
(previous year Rs. 0.15 crores). This is on account of filing of
incorrect particulars regarding challans deposited as compared to
actual challans deposited.
Sales Tax Cases
b. Demand order of assessment received under Haryana VAT Act 2003 for
Rs.0.43 crores for disallowing the input tax on purchase of furnace
oil. An appeal has been filed on May 15, 2010 before the Joint Excise &
Taxation Commissioner (Appeals), Faridabad. The appeal was decided by
the Joint Commissioner (Appeals) and the case was remanded back to the
Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Gurgaon (West). During the
year the Company has received an order from the Deputy Excise and
Taxation Commissioner, Gurgaon (West) in its favour.
c. A demand was raised under Haryana VAT Act 2003 for denial of input
credit availed on purchase of furnace oil. The demand was confirmed by
Joint Commissioner (Range) for Rs. 0.04 crores (previous year Rs. 0.04
crores). An appeal was filed with Haryana Sales Tax Tribunal on
February 23, 2013. Tribunal has remanded the case back to Joint
Commissioner, Gurgaon.
d. During the year ended March 31, 2015 a demand was raised under
Haryana VAT Act 2003 for denial of input credit availed on purchase of
furnace oil. The order passed by the Deputy Excise and Taxation
Commissioner, Rewari for Rs. 0.22 crores. The Company has filed an
appeal with Haryana Sales Tax Tribunal on August 25, 2014 and is
presently pending before it.
Excise and Service Tax Cases
e. Department has issued a show cause notice dated August 23, 2007 on
the ground that the capital goods namely roof ventilator and
evaporating cooling machine are not capital goods for the purpose of
availment of CENVAT credit. Commissioner of Central Excise has
confirmed the demand along with an equal amount of penalty. The Company
aggrieved by the order field an appeal before CESTAT on April 28, 2009
against the decision. However, the CESTAT has granted unconditional
stay from recovery of impugned amount on deposit of Rs. 0.03 crores.
Amount involved is Rs. 0.47 crores (previous year Rs. 0.44 crores). No
hearing has taken place since June 15, 2009. Current year movement
represents interest.
f. A show cause notice was issued by the Commissioner on removal of
dies for job work without payment of duty. Commissioner passed the
order on September 15, 2008 demanding excise duty of Rs. 0.75 crores,
penalty of equal amount, interest at the applicable rate and a fine in
lieu of confiscation of Rs. 0.10 crores on the dies released
provisionally. Further, Company has also furnished a bond of Rs 0.42
crores and a bank guarantee of Rs 0.004 crores. A stay application was
filed before the CESTAT. Total amount involved is Rs. 2.71 crores
(previous year Rs. 2.57 crores). Current year movement represents
interest.
g. A show cause notice was received from the Joint Commissioner of
Central Excise towards cenvat credit availed on custom house agent and
courier export related services during previous years 2004-05 to
2007-08. The Commissioner has confirmed the demand against which the
Company filed an appeal before CESTAT. CESTAT ordered pre deposition of
Rs. 0.24 crores. The amount involved is Rs. 1.47 crores (previous year
Rs. 1.40 crores). Current year movement represents interest.
h. A show cause notice was received from Additional Commissioner of
Central Excise on a ailment of cenvat on construction and other repair
and maintenance service during previous years 2005-06 to 2010-11.
Commissioner of Central Excise confirmed the demand against which the
Company filed an appeal before the CESTAT on June 29, 2012. CESTAT has
granted an unconditional stay on February 19, 2013.. Matter is pending
for final decision before the Tribunial amount involved is Rs. 2.15
crores (previous year Rs. 2.04 crores). Current year movement
represents interest.
i. Department has issued a show cause notice dated January 17, 2011 in
respect of claim of cenvat on insurance, catering, tent house and taxi
& travels for the period 2010-11. Joint commissioner has confirmed the
demand against reply filed. An appeal was filed before the commissioner
of central excise (appeals) Delhi-Ill, Gurgaon on January 31, 2012.
Commissioner (Appeals) in its order dated January 21, 2013 decided the
appeal in favour of Company on May 7, 2013, department has been filed
Appeal before Tribunal against said order. The amount involved is
Rs.0.42 crores (Previous year Rs. 0.40 crores). Current year movement
represents interest.
j. Department has issued a show cause notice received from Joint
Commissioner of Central Excise dated October 08, 2008 in respect of
claim of cenvat on insurance, catering, tent house and taxi & travels
for the period 2004-05 to 2007-08. Demand confirmed by Additional
Commissioner, against reply filed. Appeal filed before the commissioner
of central excise (appeals) Delhi-Ill, Gurgaon on March 21, 2014. The
amount involved is Rs. 1.30 crores (Previous year Rs. 1.23 crores).
Current year movement represents interest.
k. Department has issued a show cause notice dated April 17, 2009 in
respect of claim of cenvat on insurance, catering, tent house and taxi
& travels for the period 2008-09. On January 30, 2014 Additional
Commissioner has confirmed the demand against the reply filed. Appeal
filed before the commissioner of central excise (appeals) Delhi-Ill,
Gurgaon on March 21, 2014. The amount involved is Rs. 0.19 crores
(Previous year Rs. 0.18 crores). Current year movement represent
interest.
I. Department has issued a show cause notice dated February 18, 2010 in
respect of claim of cenvat on insurance, catering, tent house and taxi
& travels for the period February, 2009 to December, 2010 . On January
30, 2014 Additional Commissioner has confirmed the demand against the
reply filed. Appeal filed before the commissioner of central excise
(appeals) Delhi-Ill, Gurgaon on March 21, 2014. The amount involved is
Rs. 0.29 crores (Previous year Rs. 0.27 crores). Current year movement
represent interest.
m. Department has issued a show cause notice dated December 27, 2011 in
respect of claim of cenvat on insurance, catering, tent house and taxi
& travels for the period January, 2011 to November, 2011. On January
30, 2014 Additional Commissioner has confirmed the demand against the
reply filed. Appeal filed before the commissioner of central excise
(appeals) Delhi-Ill, Gurgaon on March 21, 2014. The amount involved is
Rs. 0.01 crores (Previous year Rs. 0.01 crores).
n. Department has issued a show cause notice dated December 31, 2012 in
respect of claim of cenvat on insurance, catering, tent house and taxi
& travels for the period December, 2011 to November, 2012. On January
30, 2014 Additional Commissioner has confirmed the demand against the
reply filed. Appeal filed before the commissioner of central excise
(appeals) Delhi-Ill, Gurgaon on March 21, 2014. The amount involved is
Rs. 0.73 crores (Previous year Rs. 0.68 crores).
o. Additional commissioner disallowed cenvat credit availed on
consultancy charges, courier charges etc. for the period March 2005 to
December 2010 amounting to Rs. 0.39 crores, imposed penalty of Rs. 0.39
crores and provisional interest of Rs. 0.18 crores. The Company filed
an appeal against the order before the Commissioner (Appeals) which was
adjudged in favor of the Company on February 15, 2013. Department has
filed further Appeal before CESTAT against the order on June 06, 2013.
The amount involved was Rs. 0.96 crores. During the year the Company
has received an order from the CESTAT in its favour.
p. Assistant Commissioner disallowed cenvat credit availed on service
tax paid on different activities. Amount involved is Rs. 0.06 crores.
The case wass decided by Commissioner (Appeals) against the Company on
February 11, 2011. Company has filed an appeal before the Tribunal.
During the year the Company has received an order from the CESTAT in
its favour.
q. Department has issued a show cause notice dated December 14, 2011 in
respect of claim of cenvat on input services namely courier, insurance,
bank processing, transport, travel agency for the period 2011-12. On
February 3, 2014. Commissioner of Central Excise has confirmed the
demand. Appeal filed before the Commissioner of Central excise
(Appeals) on April 7, 2014. The amount involved is Rs.0.11 crores.
During the year the Company has received an order from the Commissioner
of Central Excise (Appeals) in its favour.
r. A show cause notice was issued disallowing cenvat credit related to
service tax. An appeal was filed before the Commissioner (Appeals) and
the decision was given in favor of the department. The Company filed an
appeal before Tribunal against the decision and the Tribunal remanded
back the case to Commissioner (Appeals). The amount involved is Rs.
0.05 crores. During the year the Company has received an order from the
Commissioner (Appeals) in its favour.
s. A show cause notice has been received from the Additional
Commissioner of Central Excise towards Cenvat availed on outward
freight during 2005-06 and 2006-07. The Joint Commissioner confirmed
the demand against which the Company appealed before CESTAT. The
Tribunal remanded back the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) and it is
pending before it. Amount involved is Rs.0.25 crores (previous year Rs.
0.24 crores). Current year movement represents interest.
Others
t. Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam (DHBVN) has demanded Rs. 5.60
crores (previous year Rs. 5.60 crores) for overdrawing power as
compared to approved load limit. DHBVN filed a writ petition before
Honorable High Court of Punjab and Haryana and presently the case is
pending and hearing is now adjourned to September 4, 2015. The Company
has deposited Rs 3.60 crores during the financial year 2011-12.
u. A demand was raised under Haryana Local Area Development Tax Act,
2000 for tax on central purchase of certain items. An appeal was filed
before with Joint Commissioner (Appeal) and the amount involved is Rs.
0.01 crores (Previous year Rs. 0.01 crores).
I) Guarantees
a. On behalf of subsidiary companies:
The Company has given Corporate Guarantees to the Bankers for the loan
taken by following Subsidiaries:
Note 1 Â CURRENT ASSETS, LOANS & ADVANCES
In the opinion of the Board of Directors, current assets, loans and
advances are having the value at which they are stated in the Balance
Sheet, if realized in the ordinary course of business save as otherwise
stated in this Balance Sheet.
Note 2 - The Company's operating lease payments are due on premises
and certain other items taken on lease for operating activities.
Aggregate rental expenses under operating leases amounted to Rs.1.34
crores (previous year Rs. 1.80 crores) for the year, has been charged
to the Statement of Profit and Loss.
* A Subsidiary Company namely Rico Investments Limited has been
incorporated on January 7, 2015. The Company has made an investment of
Rs.46.00 crores in the Equity Share Capital and Rs.44.00 crores in the
Preference Share Capital, (Compulsorily convertible Preference Shares)
in aggregate amounting to Rs.90.00 crores. Rico Investments Limited is
a Core Investment Company (CIC) - NBFC, incorporated for the purpose of
acquiring and holding strategic Investments in the Group Companies of
Rico Auto Industries Limited. The Company holds investment in three
subsidiaries, namely Rasa Autocom Limited, Rico Jinfei Wheels Limited
and Rico Aluminum and Ferrous Auto components Limited (formerly known
as RAA Autonomy Limited).
Note 3 Â Segment information as required under AS-17 "Segment
Reporting", has been provided in the consolidated financial statements
of the Company and therefore no separate disclosure on segment
information is given in these standalone financial statements.
Note 4 Â In accordance with Accounting Standard 11 "The effects of
Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates", the Company has chosen to avail the
option to capitalize exchange differences arising on long term foreign
currency monetary items to the cost of the relevant fixed assets and
amortizing it over the remaining useful life of the fixed assets.
Amount remaining to be amortized is as under:
Note 5 Â During the current year, the Company has carried out a
comprehensive review of its business activities/investment in
Subsidiaries and has identified certain businesses undergoing
continuing pressure. In order to turnaround these business divisions,
the management has, with a strategic view and bring in more focused
attention on these businesses, have decided to restructure its business
activities to ensure optimize operational efficiency and consequently
maximize the shareholders' value. As part of the restructuring, the
Company after obtaining the shareholders approval on March 14, 2015.
A. Sold its (i) Ferrous based Auto Components Business Division located
at Gurgaon and Manesar (Haryana) ("Ferrous Undertaking") and (ii)
Non-ferrous based Auto Components Business Division located at Sanand
(Non-ferrous undertaking) (collectively may be referred as
"Undertaking"); to its one of the Subsidiary Companies namely Rico
Aluminum and Ferrous Auto Components Limited "RAFA" (formerly known as
RAA Autocom Limited) as going concern on a slump sale basis and on
arm's length. The lump sum sale consideration for Ferrous and
Non-ferrous Undertaking is Rs.39.59 crores and Rs.4.81 crores
respectively, which has been arrived at without values being assigned
at individual assets and liabilities, is received by the Company.
Consequently, loss of Rs.173.62 crores has been recorded under
exceptional items. The following statement shows the revenue and
expenses of continuing and discontinuing operations:
Note 6 - Exceptional items include the following:
a. Sale of shares in the Joint Venture, FCC Rico Limited
Consequent to the sale of all shares held by the Company in the joint
venture for a total gross consideration of Rs. 495.00 crores, the
Company has recorded a gain of Rs. 491.05 crores. Further, legal and
professional expenses of Rs. 4.42 crores are incurred in relation to
sale of investment in FCC Rico Limited, have been netted from the sale
consideration.
b. Loss on sale of business divisions
As detailed in Note 48A above, the Company has sold its (a) Ferrous
Undertaking and (b) Non- Ferrous based auto components business
division on a going concern basis and has recorded a loss of Rs. 173.62
crores.
c. Loss on sale of investments in subsidiaries
As detailed in Note 48B above, the Company has sold its investment in
Rico Aluminum and Ferrous Auto Components Limited (formerly known as
RAA Autocom Limited), Rasa Autonomy Limited and Rico Jinfei Wheels
Limited and has recorded a loss of Rs. 49.07 crores.
d. Loss on diminution in the value of loans and advances
During the year, the Company entered into settlement agreement with
Rico Aluminum and Ferrous Auto Components Limited (formerly known as
RAA Autocom Limited), Uttrakhand Automotive limited, Rico Jinfei Wheels
Limited and Rasa Autocom limited for recovery of loans aggregating to
Rs. 100.19 crores given by the Company over the past few years. As per
the settlement agreement, out of Rs. 100.19 crores, an aggregate of
Rs. 30.49 crores, representing interest accrued on such loans and Rs.
8.67 crores of the loan balance recoverable from Uttrakhand Automotive
Limited has been provided for.
e. Other items
Exceptional item also include expenditure incurred pursuant to
voluntary retirement scheme of the Company amounting to Rs. 2.58 crores
and assets write off amounting to Rs. 1.25 crores.
Note 7 - Effective from April 1, 2014, the Company has charged
depreciation based on the revised remaining useful life of the assets
as per the requirement of Schedule II of the Companies Act, 2013.
Further, based on transitional provision provided in Note 7(b) of
Schedule II, an amount of Rs. 2.89 crores (depreciation of Rs. 4.28
crores, related tax impact of Rs.1.39 crores) has been adjusted against
retained earnings. Based on the technical estimate and history of
usage, the Company has retained useful life of certain categories of
plant and machinery which is higher than the useful life as indicated
in Schedule II. Owing to aforementioned change in estimate (except for
certain categories of plant and machinery where the earlier useful life
is retained), depreciation charge for the year is lower by Rs. 0.79
crores.
Note 8 Â During the year, the Company completed the sale of all of its
shares in the Joint Venture, FCC Rico Limited, a joint venture between
the Company and FCC Co. Ltd., Japan for a total gross consideration of
Rs.495.00 crores to FCC Co. Ltd., Japan and/or its affiliates as on
December 23, 2014. The transaction was carried out at arm's length
based on valuation performed by the valuation expert.
Note 9 Â As per the transfer pricing norms applicable in India, the
Company is required to use certain specified methods in computing arm's
length price of transactions between the associated enterprises and
maintain prescribed information and documents related to such
transactions. The appropriate method to be adopted will depend on the
nature of the transactions/class of transactions, class of associated
persons, functions performed and other factors, which have been
prescribed. The Company is in the process of conducting a transfer
pricing study for the current financial period. However, in the opinion
of the management the same would not have a material impact on these
financial statements. Accordingly, these financial statements do not
include any adjustments for the transfer pricing implications, if any.
Note 10 Â Previous year's amounts have been regrouped/ reclassified,
wherever considered necessary to make them comparable with those of the
current year.
Mar 31, 2014
Note 1 - CORPORATE INFORMATION
Rico Auto Industries Limited was incorporated in India on 7 March,
1983. Rico supplies a broad range of high-precision fully machined
aluminum and ferrous components and assemblies to Original Equipment
Manufacturers across the globe. Its integrated services include design,
development, tooling, casting, machining, assembly and research and
development across aluminium and ferrous products. The Company is in
the business of manufacturing and sale of auto components for two
wheelers and four wheelers.
I) Others
a. Surety bonds executed in favor of the President of India, under
Export Promotion Capital Goods Scheme (EPCG) for importing capital
goods at concessional rate of custom duty, amounting to Rs.120.83
crores (previous year Rs.120.83 crores).
Note 2 - A fire broke out on December 7, 2012 at one section of the
Company''s ferrous foundry unit located at the Gurgaon plant. As a
result, fixed assets having a written down value of Rs.1.55 crores and
stores and spares amounting to Rs.0.29 crore were destroyed. Net amount
of Rs. 0.02 crore (last year Rs.1.02 crores) has been shown as
receivable from insurance Company in the books of accounts. The
management has lodged a claim with the insurance Company and does not
foresee any financial loss on this account.
Note 3 - The Company has performed a detailed assessment involving an
independent valuer to determine whether there is any permanent
diminution in the value of investments in two subsidiaries namely Rasa
Autocom Limited and Rico Jinfei Wheels Limited and if advances or other
receivables as of March 31,2014, from such subsidiaries are
recoverable. Material estimates and judgments used for the purposes of
business plans of these subsidiaries, which form the basis of such
assessment, continue to be appropriate, accordingly, the management has
concluded that no adjustments to the carrying values of underlying
investments aggregating to Rs.50.53 crores and advances or other
receivables aggregating to Rs.54.07 crores pertaining to these
subsidiaries are required to be made in the financial statements for
the year ended March 31,2014.
Note 4 - The Company''s operating lease payments are due on premises
taken on lease for operating activities. Aggregate rental expenses
under operating leases amounted to Rs.1.80 crores (previous year
Rs.1.33 crores) for the year, has been charged to the statement of
profit and loss.
Note 5 - RELATED PARTY DISCLOSURES
A. Related Parties where control exists
Name of the Related Parties Description of Relationship
Rico Auto Industries Inc. USA Subsidiary
Rico Auto Industries (UK) Limited, UK Subsidiary
Rasa Autocom Limited Subsidiary
Uttarakhand Automotives Limited Subsidiary
RAA Autocom Limited Subsidiary
Rico Jinfei Wheels Limited Subsidiary
AAN Engineering Industries Limited Subsidiary
FCC Rico Limited Joint Venture
Magna Rico Powertrain Private Limited Joint Venture
Kapsons Associates Investments Private Limited Entity in which KMP
exercise significant influence
Rico Castings Limited Entity in which KMP exercise significant
influence
Higain Investments Private Limited Entity in which KMP exercise
significant influence
Octan Media Limited Entity in which KMP exercise significant influence
Kapbros Engineering Industries Limited Entity in which KMP exercise
significant influence
Raasaa Retail Private Limited Entity in which KMP exercise significant
influence
Haridwar Estates Private Limited Entity in which KMP exercise
significant influence
B. Key Management Personnel
Details of Key Managerial Personnel are as under:
i) Shri Arvind Kapur - Chairman, CEO & Managing Director
ii) Shri Arun Kapur - Joint Managing Director
Note 5 - Segment Information, as required under AS-17 "Segment
Reporting", has been provided in the consolidated financial
statements of the company and therefore no separate disclosure on
segment information is given in these standalone financial statements.
Note 6 - As per the transfer pricing norms applicable in India, the
Company is required to use certain specified methods in computing arm''s
length price of transactions between the associated enterprises and
maintain prescribed information and documents relating to such
transactions. The appropriate method to be adopted will depend on the
nature of the transactions/class of transactions, class of associated
persons, functions performed and other factors, which have been
prescribed. The Company is in the process of conducting a transfer
pricing study for the current financial period. However, in the opinion
of the management the same would not have a material impact on these
financial statements. Accordingly, these financial statements do not
include any adjustments for the transfer pricing implications, if any.
Note 7 - Previous year''s amounts have been regrouped/ reclassified,
wherever considered necessary to make them comparable with those of the
current year.
Mar 31, 2013
Note 1 - CORPORATE INFORMATION
Rico Auto Industries Limited was incorporated in India on 7th March,
1983. Rico supplies a broad range of high-precision fully machined
aluminium and ferrous components and assemblies to Original Equipment
Manufacturers across the globe. Its integrated services include design,
development, tooling, casting, machining, assembly and research and
development across aluminium and ferrous products. The Company is in
the business of manufacturing and sale of auto components for two
wheelers and four wheelers.
Note 2 - CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
I) Demand against the Company not acknowledged as Liability
(Rs. in Crores)
Year ended Year ended
Particulars March 31,
2013 March 31, 2012
i) Income Tax 0.16 4.58
ii) Sales Tax 0.79 0.49
iii) Excise and Service Tax 11.42 10.46
iv) Others 5.61 5.61
Income Tax Cases
a. Income tax department has raised demand for Rs.0.12 crore (previous
year Rs.4.54 crores). This is on account of filing of incorrect
particulars regarding challans deposited as compared to actual challans
deposited. The Company has rectified error of Rs.4.54 crores during the
year ended March 31, 2013.
b. Demand of Rs.0.04 crore (previous year Rs.0.04 crore), including
interest, for the assessment year 2005-06 was issued in relation to
disallowance of certain expenses amounting to Rs.0.05 crore. The demand
was set aside by Commissioner (Appeals) and a further appeal was filed
on November 27, 2012 before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh.
Hearing before ITAT was held on May 14, 2013 and the matter was decided
in favor of the Company. The order copy of the ITAT is awaited.
Sales Tax Cases
a. Demand order of assessment received under Haryana VAT Act, 2003 for
Rs.0.45 crore (previous year Rs.0.45 crore) for disallowing the input
tax on purchase of furnace oil. An appeal has been filed on May 15,
2010 before the Joint Excise & Taxation Commissioner (Appeals),
Faridabad.
b. The Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner-cum-assessing
authority, Gurgaon has raised demand order dated March 29, 2013 of
Rs.0.30 crore (previous year Nil) against short submission of C forms.
The Company is required to submit the relevant C forms by May 30, 2013.
c. A demand was raised under Haryana VAT Act, 2003 for denial of input
credit availed on purchase of furnace oil. The demand was confirmed by
Joint Commissioner (Range) for Rs.0.04 crore (previous year Rs.0.04
crore). An appeal was filed with Haryana Sales Tax Tribunal on February
23, 2013. The matter is yet to be decided by the Tribunal.
Excise and Service Tax Cases
a. Department has issued a show cause notice dated August 23, 2007 on
the ground that the capital goods namely roof ventilator and
evaporating cooling machine are not capital goods for the purpose of
availment of CENVAT credit. Commissioner of Central Excise has
confirmed the demand along with an equal amount of penalty. Appeal
filed to CESTAT on April 28, 2009 against the decision. However, the
CESTAT has granted unconditional stay from recovery of impugned amount
on deposit of Rs.0.03 crore. Amount involved is Rs.0.42 crore (previous
year Rs.0.36 crore). No hearing has taken place since June 15, 2009.
b. A show cause notice was received from the Commissioner of Central
Excise on March 16, 2004 by Dharuhera division. Through order of
Commissioner of Central Excise, Cenvat credit disallowed is Rs.0.55
crore and penalty and interest is also levied. Total amount involved is
Rs.1.91 crores (previous year Rs.1.81 crores). CESTAT has in its order
dated May 8, 2013 decided the appeal in favor of the Company. But the
time limit for the department to file further appeal against the
decision has not lapsed.
c. Central Excise Authority had denied MODVAT/CENVAT availed for wrong
description of material and tariff number on invoice of the vendor. The
amount involved is Rs.0.15 crore (previous year Rs.0.14 crore). The
Additional Commissioner, Central Excise, Delhi has decided in favor of
the Company. An appeal was filed by Commissioner of Central excise,
Delhi, before CESTAT on July 29, 2008, against the order. CESTAT upheld
the decision given by Commissioner (Appeals) in favor of the Company.
But the time limit for the department to file further appeal against
the decision has not lapsed, hence this is considered as contingent
liability.
d. A show cause notice was issued by the Commissioner on removal of
dies for job work without payment of duty. Commissioner passed the
order on September 15, 2008 demanding excise duty of Rs.0.75 crore,
penalty of equal amount, interest at the applicable rate and a fine in
lieu of confiscation of Rs.0.10 crore on the dies released
provisionally. Further, Company has also furnished a bond of Rs.0.42
crore and a bank guarantee of Rs.0.004 crore. A stay application was
filed before the CESTAT. Total amount involved is Rs.2.36 crores
(previous year Rs.2.22 crores).
e. A show cause notice has been received from the Additional
Commissioner of Central Excise towards Cenvat availed on outward
freight during 2005-06 and 2006-07. The Joint Commissioner confirmed
the demand against which the Company appealed before CESTAT. The
Tribunal remanded back the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) and it is
pending before it. Amount involved is Rs.0.22 crore (previous year
Rs.0.21 crore).
f. A show cause notice was received from the Joint Commissioner of
Central Excise towards cenvat credit availed on custom house agent and
courier export related services during previous years 2004-05 to
2007-08. The Commissioner has confirmed the demand against which the
Company filed an appeal before CESTAT. CESTAT ordered pre deposition of
Rs.0.24 crore. The amount involved is Rs.1.33 crores (previous year
Rs.1.01 crores).
g. A show cause notice was received from Additional Commissioner of
Central Excise on availment of cenvat on construction and other repair
and maintenance service during previous years 2005-06 to 2010-11.
Commissioner of Central Excise confirmed the demand against which the
Company filed an appeal before the CESTAT on June 29, 2012. CESTAT has
granted an unconditional stay on February 19, 2013. The amount involved
is Rs.1.92 crores (previous year Rs.1.81 crores).
h. Additional Commissioner disallowed cenvat credit availed on
consultancy charges, courier charges etc. for the period March, 2005 to
December, 2010 amounting to Rs.0.39 crore, imposed penalty of Rs.0.39
crore and provisional interest of Rs.0.09 crore. The Company filed an
appeal against the order before the Commissioner (Appeals) which was
adjudged in favor of the Company on February 15, 2013. But the time
limit to file further appeal against the decision has not lapsed. The
amount involved is Rs.0.88 crore (previous year Rs.0.81 crore).
i. Assistant Commissioner disallowed cenvat credit availed on service
tax paid on different activities. Amount involved is Rs.0.06 crore
(previous year Rs.0.06 crore). The case is decided by Assistant
Commissioner against the Company on February 11, 2011. Company has
filed an appeal before the Commissioner against the order. Hearing for
the appeal is on June 5, 2013.
j. A show cause notice was issued by the department as the Company did
not charge service tax on the amount charged for modification of dies
on request of customers. Amount involved is Rs.0.24 crore (previous
year Rs.0.24 crore). The case is decided by Additional Commissioner in
favor of the Company on May 25, 2013. But the time limit for the
department to file further appeal against the decision has not lapsed.
k. A show cause notice was issued disallowing cenvat credit related to
service tax. An appeal was filed before the Commissioner (Appeals) and
the decision was given in favor of the department. The Company intends
to file an appeal to Tribunal against the decision. The amount involved
is Rs.0.04 crore (previous year Rs.0.04 crore).
l. The department has issued a show cause notice for selling identical
parts at two different assessable values to the same customer at the
same time and place of removal. Amount involved is Rs.1.89 crores
(previous year Rs.1.75 crores). Company has submitted their reply
against show cause order to the Commissioner of Central Excise.
Others
a. Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam (DHBVN) has demanded Rs.5.60
crores (previous year Rs.5.60 crores) for overdrawing power as compared
to approved load limit. Case is pending at Hon''ble High court of Punjab
and Haryana through writ petition filed on January 22, 2013 by DHBVN.
The case came up for hearing on March 5, 2013 and is adjourned till
September 10, 2013 for further hearing.
b. A demand was raised under Haryana Local Area Development Tax Act,
2000 for tax on central purchase of certain items. An appeal was filed
before Joint Commissioner (Appeal) and the amount involved is Rs.0.01
crore (previous year Rs.0.01 crore).
III) Others
a. Letters of Credit outstanding in favour of suppliers for Rs.6.14
crores (previous year Rs.5.82 crores).
b. Surety bonds executed in favor of the President of India, under
Export Promotion Capital Goods Scheme (EPCG) for importing capital
goods at concessional rate of custom duty, amounting to Rs.120.83
crores (previous year Rs.120.83 crores).
Note 3 Â The management has identified enterprises which have provided
goods and services to the Company and which qualify under the
definition of micro and small enterprises, as defined under Micro,
Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (MSMEDA).
Accordingly, the disclosure in respect of the amounts payable to such
enterprises as at March 31, 2013 has been made in the financial
statements based on information received and available with the
Company.
Note 4 Â A fire broke out on December 7, 2012 at one section of the
Company''s ferrous foundry unit located at the Gurgaon plant. As a
result, fixed assets having a written down value of Rs.1.55 crores and
raw materials amounting to Rs.0.29 crore were destroyed. Net amount of
Rs.1.02 crores (after considering the salvage value of Rs.0.82 crore)
has been shown as receivable from insurance Company in the books of
accounts. The management has lodged a claim with the insurance Company
and does not foresee any financial loss on this account.
Note 5 Â Until March 31, 2012, the Company was recording dies and
moulds as stores and spares in inventory which was charged to
consumption in the year of use. During the year ended March 31, 2013
the Company, based on the technical evaluation and keeping in view the
industry practice, has changed its accounting policy wherein such
inventory is treated as fixed assets. Dies are now depreciated over
their respective useful lives based on a technical estimate. Due to
this change in accounting policy, reported profit for the current year
is higher by Rs.9.07 crores whereas fixed assets are higher by Rs.21.43
crores and inventory is lowgr by Rs.12.36 crores.
Note 6 Â CURRENT ASSETS, LOANS & ADVANCES
In the opinion of the Board of Directors, current assets, loans and
advances are having the value at which they are stated in the Balance
Sheet, if realized in the ordinary course of business save as otherwise
stated in this Balance Sheet.
Note 7 Â The Company''s operating lease payments are due on premises
taken on lease for operating activities. Aggregate rental expenses
under operating leases amounted to Rs.1.33 crores (previous year
Rs.0.28 crore) for the year, has been charged to the statement of
profit and loss.
Note 8 Â The Company has taken advantage of the exemption contained in
Accounting Standard (AS) 17 on "Segment Reporting" and therefore not
disclosed segment information in its standalone financial statements.
The segment information has been disclosed in the summary of
significant accounting policies and other explantory notes of the
consolidated financial statements.
Note 9 Â Pursuant to the notification issued by The Ministry of
Corporate Affairs dated May 11, 2011 read with the notification issued
on March 31, 2009, the Company has chosen to avail the option to
capitalise exchange differences arising on long term foreign currency
monetary items to the cost of the relevant fixed assets and amortising
it over the remaining useful life of the fixed assets. Amount
remaining to be amortised is as under:
Note 10 Â Previous year''s amounts have been re-grouped/re-classified,
wherever considered necessary to make them comparable with those of the
current year.
Mar 31, 2012
Note 1 - CORPORATE INFORMATION
Rico Auto Industries Limited was incorporated in India on 7th March,
1983. Rico is a dynamic world-class engineering group, supplying a
broad range of high-precision fully machined aluminium and ferrous
components and assemblies to OEMs across the globe. Its integrated
services include design, development, tooling, casting, machining,
assembly and R&D across aluminium and ferrous products. The Company is
in the business of manufacturing and sale of Auto Components for Two
Wheelers & Four Wheelers.
SECURED LOANS
Security Details of Current Year:
a) Foreign Currency USD Term Loans, Non-Funded Capex Limits and Rupee
Term Loans are secured by hypothecation of movable fixed assets, both
present & future, of the Company ranking first pari-passu charge basis
among Axis Bank Limited, Export- Import Bank of India, IndusInd Bank
Limited, Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, State Bank of Hyderabad, State
Bank of Patiala and Yes Bank Limited. These Loans are also secured by
mortgage by way of deposit of title deeds of the immovable properties
of the Company situated at Dharuhera and Gurgaon ranking pari-passu
charge basis amongst the said banks.
b) Term Loan of Rs.25.00 Crores from Yes Bank Limited is additionally
secured by corporate guarantee of an Associate Company and personal
guarantees of Managing Director, Joint Managing Director and a Director
of the Company.
c) Capex - Non Funded Facilities of Rs.11.00 Crores & Rs.10.00 Crores
availed from IDBI Bank Limited and Yes Bank Limited respectively are
secured by exclusive charge on all machineries/assets imported/acquired
by utilising the said facilities.
Terms of Repayment:
à Axis Bank Limited - Loan-I, Terms: Originally taken for Rs.30.00
Crores in March, 2010 repayable in 14 quaterly instalments after
moratorium of six quarters. Last Instalment is repayable in March,
2015, Rate of Interest as on 31st March, 2012: 13.75% (Previous Year:
12.50%).
à Axis Bank Limited - Loan-II, Terms: Originally taken for Rs.25.00
Crores in March, 2011 repayable in 14 quaterly instalments after
moratorium of six quarters. Last Instalment is repayable in March,
2016, Rate of Interest as on 31st March, 2012: 13.50% (Previous Year:
12.25%).
à State Bank of Hyderabad - Loan-I, Terms: Originally taken for
Rs.40.00 Crores in November, 2009 repayable in 14 quaterly instalments
after moratorium of six quarters. Last Instalment is repayable in
November, 2014. Rate of Interest as on 31st March, 2012: 13.50%
(Previous Year: 13.00%).
à State Bank of Hyderabad - Loan-II, Terms: Originally taken for
Rs.30.00 Crores in September, 2010 repayable in 14 quaterly instalments
after moratorium of six quarters. Last Instalment is repayable in
September, 2015. Rate of Interest as on 31st March, 2012: 13.50%
(Previous Year: 13.00%).
à State Bank of Patiala - Loan-I, Terms: Originally taken for Rs.35.00
Crores in September, 2009 repayable in 14 quaterly instalments after
moratorium of six quarters. Last Instalment is repayable in September,
2014. Rate of Interest as on 31st March, 2012: 14.25% (Previous Year:
12.50%).
à State Bank of Patiala - Loan-II, Terms: Originally taken for Rs.50.00
Crores in January, 2011 repayable in 12 quarterly instalments after
moratorium of eight quarters. Last Instalment is repayable in January,
2016. Rate of Interest as on 31st March, 2012: 14.25% (Previous Year:
12.50%).
à Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited - Loan-I, Terms: Originally taken for
Rs.30.00 Crores in September, 2009 repayable in 12 quarterly
instalments after moratorium of zero quarters. Last Instalment is
repayable in September, 2012. Rate of Interest as on 31st March, 2012:
11.00% (Previous Year: 11.00%).
à Yes Bank Limited - Loan-I, Terms: Originally taken for Rs.25.00
Crores in December, 2008 repayable in 30 monthly instalments after
moratorium of eighteen months. Last Instalment is repayable in
December, 2012. Rate of Interest as on 31st March, 2012: 14.95%
(Previous Year: 12.95%).
à Export-Import Bank of India - Loan-I, Terms: Originally taken for
Rs.15.97 Crores in February, 2011 repayable in 20 quarterly instalments
after moratorium of eight quarters. Last Instalment is repayable in
February, 2018. Rate of Interest as on 31st March, 2012: 11.72%
(Previous Year: 10.99%).
à Export-Import Bank of India - Loan-II, Terms: Originally taken for
USD Two Millions in February, 2011 repayable in 20 quarterly
instalments after moratorium of eight quarters. Last Instalment is
repayable in February, 2018. Rate of Interest as on 31st March, 2012:
L 4.50% (Previous Year: L 4.50%).
à IndusInd Bank Limited - Loan-I, Terms: Took over Rs.39.29 Crores
Rupee Term Loan of IDBI Bank Limited in equivalent USD in April, 2011.
Last Instalment is repayable to IndusInd Bank in March, 2014. Rate of
Interest as on 31st March, 2012: 8.05% (Previous Year: IDBI Bank
Limited: Taken for Rs.50.00 Crores in March, 2009 repayble in 14
quaterly instalments after moratorium of six quarters. Rate of Interest
as on 31st March, 2011: 14.00%).
Security Details of Previous Year:
a) Foreign Currency ECB Loan, USD Loan, Non-Funded Capex Limits and
Rupee Term Loans are secured by hypothecation of movable fixed assets,
both present & future, of the Company ranking first pari-passu charge
basis among Axis Bank Limited, Citibank N.A., IDBI Bank Limited,
Export-Import Bank of India, Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, State Bank of
Hyderabad, State Bank of Patiala, Standard Chartered Bank and Yes Bank
Limited. These Loans are also secured by mortgage by way of deposit of
title deeds of the immovable properties of the Company situated at
Dharuhera and Gurgaon ranking pari-passu charge basis amongst the said
banks except that of USD/INR Loan equivalent to Rs.50.00 Crores from
Export-Import Bank of India, Rupee Term Loan/ Non- Funded Limit of
Rs.40.00 Crores from State Bank of Hyderabad, Rupee Term Loan of
Rs.50.00 Crores from State Bank of Patiala and Rupee Term Loan from
Axis Bank Limited for Rs.25.00 Crores which are yet to be secured by
mortgage of deposit of title deeds of abovesaid properties of the
Company.
b) Term Loan of Rs.25.00 Crores from Yes Bank Limited is additionally
secured by corporate guarantee of an Associate Company and personal
guarantees of Managing Director, Joint Managing Director and a Director
of the Company.
c) Capex - Non Funded Facilities of Rs.11.00 Crores, Rs.11.00 Crores &
Rs.10.00 Crores availed from IDBI Bank Limited, Kotak Mahindra Bank
Limited and Yes Bank Limited respectively are secured by exclusive
charge on all machineries/assets imported/ acquired by utilising the
said facilities.
UNSECURED LOANS
Security Details of Current Year:
Term Loan of Tata Capital Limited is secured by personal guarantee of
Managing Director of the Company.
Terms of Repayment:
à Tata Capital Limited - Terms : Taken for Rs.5.82 Crores in June, 2011
repayable in 60 monthly instalments after moratorium of twelve months.
Last Instalment is repayable in June, 2017. Rate of Interest as on 31st
March, 2012 : 14.50% (Previous Year: Not Applicable).
WORKING CAPITAL LOANS
Working Capital Loans from Banks are secured by hypothecation of
current assets including receivables & inventories, both present &
future, ranking first pari-passu charge basis among Axis Bank Limited,
Citibank N.A., DBS Bank Limited, HDFC Bank Limited, IDBI Bank Limited,
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, Standard Chartered Bank, State Bank of
Hyderabad, State Bank of India, State Bank of Patiala, The Hongkong &
Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited and Yes Bank Limited.
Security Details of Current Year:
à State Bank of India for Working Capital of Rs.14.00 Crores &
Non-Funded Rs.1.00 Crore: First pari-passu charge on all the current
assets of the Company including all types of Stocks of raw material,
stores, spares, stock-in-process, finished goods etc, lying in their
premises, godowns, elsewhere including goods in transit and Company's
book debts/receivables, both present and future.
à IDBI Bank Limited for Working Capital of Rs.20.00 Crores & Non-Funded
Rs.5.00 Crores: First pari-passu charge on the entire current assets of
the Company in the form of stock of raw materials, packaging materials,
stock-in-process, finished goods, stores and consumables & receivables.
à HDFC Bank Limited for Working Capital of Rs.10.00 Crores:
Hypothecation of Company's entire current assets including inventories,
book debts both present and future.
à The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited for Working
Capital of Rs.20.00 Crores: First pari-passu charge on currents assets
of the Company.
à Yes Bank Limited for Working Capital of Rs.5.00 Crores: First
pari-passu charge on current assets of the Company.
à Citibank N.A. for Working Capital of Rs.12.54 Crores & Non-Funded
Rs.1.36 Crores: First pari-passu charge on all present and future book
debts and stocks of the Company.
à Standard Chartered Bank for Working Capital of Rs.41.20 Crores: First
pari-passu charge on stock and book debts of the Company.
à DBS Bank Limited for Working Capital of Rs.10.00 Crores: First
pari-passu charge on stock and book debts of the Company.
à State Bank of Patiala for Working Capital of Rs.30.00 Crores &
Non-Funded Rs. 20.00 Crores: First charge over current assets of the
Company ranking pari-passu basis with other lenders, both present &
future.
à Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited for Working Capital of Rs.2.00 Crores:
First charge on all existing and future current assets of the Company.
à State Bank of Hyderabad for Working Capital of Rs.5.00 Crores: First
charge over current assets of the Company, both present and future,
ranking pari-passu basis with other lenders.
à Axis Bank Limited for Non-Funded limits of Rs.25.00 Crores: First
pari-passu charge on current assets of the Company.
Security Details of Previous Year:
à State Bank of India for Working Capital of Rs.14.00 Crores &
Non-Funded Rs.1.00 Crore: First pari-passu charge on all the current
assets of the Company including all types of Stocks of raw material,
stores, spares, stock-in-process, finished goods etc, lying in their
premises, godowns, elsewhere including goods in transit and Company's
book debts/receivables, both present and future.
à IDBI Bank Limited for Working Capital of Rs.20.00 Crores & Non-Funded
Rs.5.00 Crores: First pari-passu charge on the entire current assets of
the Company in the form of stock of raw materials, packaging materials,
stock-in-process, finished goods, stores and consumables & receivables.
à HDFC Bank Limited for Working Capital of Rs.10.00 Crores:
Hypothecation of Company's entire current assets including inventories,
book debts both present and future.
à The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited for Working
Capital of Rs.20.00 Crores: First pari-passu charge on currents assets
of the Company.
à Yes Bank Limited for Working Capital of Rs.5.00 Crores: First
pari-passu charge on current assets of the Company.
à Citibank N.A. for Working Capital of Rs.12.54 Crores & Non-Funded
Rs.1.36 Crores: First pari-passu charge on all present and future book
debts and stocks of the Company.
à Standard Chartered Bank for Working Capital of Rs.41.20 Crores: First
pari-passu charge on stock and book debts of the Company.
à DBS Bank Limited for Working Capital of Rs.10.00 Crores: First
pari-passu charge on stock and book debts of the Company.
à State Bank of Patiala for Working Capital of Rs.30.00 Crores &
Non-Funded Rs. 20.00 Crores: First charge over current assets of the
Company ranking pari-passu basis with other lenders, both present &
future.
à Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited for Working Capital of Rs.2.00 Crores:
First charge on all existing and future current assets of the Company.
à State Bank of Hyderabad for Working Capital of Rs.5.00 Crores: First
charge over current assets of the Company, both present and future,
ranking pari-passu basis with other lenders.
à Axis Bank Limited for Non-Funded limits of Rs.25.00 Crores: First
pari-passu charge on current assets of the Company.
OTHER LOANS
Security Details of Current Year:
Other Loans from Banks and Companies are secured against hypothecation
of the vehicles financed.
Security Details of Previous Year:
Other Loans from Banks and Companies are secured against hypothecation
of the vehicles financed.
UNSECURED LOANS
Security Details of Current Year:
Unsecured Foreign Currency Loans are Buyers' Credit Facility taken from
various Banks located outside India under secured Non-Funded Facilities
sanctioned and guaranteed by Banks in India viz. Axis Bank Limited, DBS
Bank Limited, IDBI Bank Limited, State Bank of Patiala, Standard
Chartered Bank and Yes Bank Limited. It also includes a Packing Credit
Foreign Currency Facility of Rs.40.00 Crores with sub limits of INR
facility of Rs.30.00 Crores of Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited.
Security Details of Previous Year:
Unsecured Foreign Currency Loans are Buyers' Credit Facility taken from
various Banks located outside India under secured Non-Funded Facilities
sanctioned and guaranteed by Banks in India viz. Axis Bank Limited, DBS
Bank Limited, State Bank of Patiala, Standard Chartered Bank and Yes
Bank Limited. It also includes a Packing Credit Foreign Currency
Facility of Rs.30.00 Crores with sub limits of INR facility of Rs.20.00
Crores of Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited.
Note 2 - CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND COMMITMENTS
I) Contingent Liabilities
Claims against the Company/disputed liabilities not acknowledged as
debts
(Rs. in Crores)
Year ended Year ended
Particulars March 31, 2012 March 31, 2011
i) Excise Duty 4.71 4.41
ii) Service Tax 4.50 1.38
iii) Income tax demands 4.73 11.15
iv) Sales tax/VAT 0.43 6.54
v) LADT 0.01 0.01
vi) Dakshin Haryana Bijili Vitran
Nigam 5.60
i) In relation to 36(I)(i) above Excise Duty cases contested by the
Company comprise of:
Show Cause Notice has been received from Assistant Commissioner of
Central Excise on dated 23rd August, 2007 in respect of claim of cenvat
on roof ventilator, evaporating cooling machine etc. appeal rejected by
Commissioner Central Excise.
Appeal filed to CEATAT for fresh decision on dated 28th April, 2009.
The amount involved is Rs.0.39 Crore (Previous year Rs.0.37 Crore).
Show Cause Notice received from Commissioner of Central Excise on dated
16th March, 2004. Disallowed the cenvat credit on the basis of sub
heading by the Commissioner of Central Excise. The amount involved is
Rs.1.91Crores (Previous year Rs.1.74 Crores).
SCN No. V (87) 15 CE-Adj/D-III/Com/161/07 dated 09.09.2008 issued by
Commissioner, (Central Excise Delhi- III) office of Commissioner
Central Excise, Delhi III Udyog Vihar, Gurgaon (Case: Removal of dies
under Rule 67/95 without payment of Duty). The Commissioner passed the
order dated 15th September, 2008 demanding excise duty of Rs.0.75 Crore
on dies sent on job work, penalty equal to the amount of duty i.e.
Rs.0.75 Crore along with interest at the applicable rates and a fine of
Rs.10.00 lacs on the dies released provisionally. Stay application was
filed with the Tribunal. The amount involved is Rs.2.26 Crores
(Previous year Rs.2.16 Crores).
Modvat of Central Excise duty on purchase of raw material from M/s
Agsons Agencies (India) Private Limited has been denied by the Central
Excise Authority for wrong description of material & tariff. No. The
Addl. Commissioner, Central Excise, Delhi vide Order No. 04/4039 dated
28.03.2007 had dropped the proceedings & the case was decided in our
favour. Appeal No. E/2191/2008 dated 29.07.2008 in CESTAT filed by CCE,
Delhi III, Guragon against the order passed in favour of Rico (Case:
Agsons Agencies) The amount involved is Rs.0.14 Crore (Previous Year
Rs.0.13 Crore).
(ii) In relation to 36(I)(ii) above Service Tax cases disputed by the
Company comprise of:
Show Cause Notice has been received from Addl. Commissioner of Central
Excise on dated 23rd August, 2007 in respect of claim of cenvat on out
ward freight for the period 2005-06 to 2006-07. Demand confirmed by
Joint Commissioner Central Excise, and again appeal filed to
Commissioner of Central Excise for fresh decision on dated 2nd June,
2008. The amount involved is Rs.0.21Crore (Previous year Rs.0.20
Crore).
Show Cause Notice has been received from Joint Commissioner of Central
Excise on dated 11th November, 2008 in respect of claim of cenvat on
CHA & Courier Export related services for the period 2004-05 to
2007-08. Demand confirmed by the Commissioner Central Excise against
appeal filed and again appeal filed to CESTAT for fresh decision on
dated 2nd July, 2010. The amount involved is Rs.1.26 Crores (Previous
year Rs.1.18 Crores).
Show Cause Notice has been received from Addl. Commissioner of Central
Excise on dated 17th January, 2011 in respect of claim of cenvat on
insurance, ctering, tent house and taxi & travels for the period
2010-11. Demand confirmed by joint commissioner, against reply filed.
Appeal filed before the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals)
Delhi-III, Gurgaon on 31.01.2012. The amount involved is Rs.0.35 Crore
(Previous year Rs.Nil).
Show cause notice has been received from Addl. Commissioner of Central
Excise on dated 28th July, 2010 in respect of claim of cenvat on
Constraction & other repair & maintenance service for the period
2005-06 to 2010-11. Demand confirmed by Commissioner of Central Excise,
Delhi-III, Gurgaon. Pending for appeal filing to CESTAT. The amount
involved is Rs.1.81 Crores (Previous year Rs.Nil).
Show Cause Notice issued to Rico under Rule 14&15 of Cenvat Credit on
Service Tax for denial of Cenvat Credit for indirect/direct services
related to business. Dy. Commissioner Division-5 Central Excise
disallowed the amount of Rs.0.06 Crore. Rico appeal Commissioner Appeal
Central Excise, Delhi-III, Gurgaon. Appeal is decided on 30.03.2012 in
which Rs.0.05 Crore allowed on services & few services related to
building repair & foundation of machinery, repair of vehicle etc. for
Rs.0.01 Crore disallowed for which we are filling appeal in Tribunal
Appeal to be filed upto 12.06.2012.
Show Cause Notice issued to Rico under Rule 2(1) of Cenvat Credit Rule
2004 for denial of input credit for direct/indirect services,
Additional Commissioner Excise Delhi-III disallowed Rs.0.39 Crore
Credit & Imposed Penalty of Rs.0.39 Crore & Interest Rs.0.09 Crore
(provisional up to March,12). Rico is filling appeal against this order
before Commissioner Appeal Delhi-III, Gurgaon, Last date for appeal on
12.06.2012 so we will submit appeal before due date.
(iii) In relation to 36(I)(iii) above Income Tax cases disputed by the
Company comprise of:
Income Tax TDS department has raised demand for Rs.11.15 Crores upto
previous year and Rs.0.70 Crore during current year. These demands
pertain to technical error on account of recent e-governance system of
Income Tax department. We have rectified TDS Returns for Rs.11.15
Crores and NIL Orders have been received for Rs.7.31 Crores till
31.3.2012. For remaining amount of Rs.4.54 Crores demand, the cases are
in process and will be settled favourably as above and so no provision
has been considered necessary.
A demand u/s 156 of the Income Tax Act,1961 for the assessment year
2005-06 for Rs.0.17 Crore out of which 50% demand was paid i.e. Rs.0.08
Crore issued to us, in relation to disallowance u/s 14A with respect to
Rule 8D of Income Tax Rules, 1962 amounting to Rs.0.26 Crore. The
appeal was filed in December, 2011 to the Commissioner of Income Tax
(Appeals)-I/II, Ludhiana.
A demand u/s 156 of the Income Tax Act,1961 for the assessment year
2008-09 for Rs.0.10 Crore issued to us, in relation to disallowance u/s
14A with respect to Rule 8D of Income Tax Rules, 1962 amounting to
Rs.0.30 Crore, disallowance in
Director's Foreign Travelling amounting to Rs.0.01Crore and relating to
publicity and advertising to the tune of Rs.0.01 Crore. The appeal was
filed in December, 2011 to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-
I/II, Ludhiana.
iv) In relation to 36(I)(iv) above notice for the Sales Tax demand of
Rs.0.43 Crore for assessment year 2006-07:
This demand order of assessment arises u/s 9(2b) read with Section
14(6) of HVAT Act, 2003 of Rs.0.43 Crore raised by Sales Tax Department
by disallowing the Input Tax on the purchase of furnace oil. It
includes interest amount Rs.0.20 Crore. The entire amount of Sales Tax
has not been deposited. Appeal against demand was filed on 15.05.2010,
before the Joint Excise & Taxation Commissioner (Appeals), Faridabad.
vi) In relation to 36(I)(vi) above notice for short assessment on
account of Maximum Demand Indicator Rs.5.60 Crores:
We applied for extension of load from 9000 KW to 18000 KW with contract
demand from 10000 KVA to 20000 KVA on 21.10.2005. The same was to be
sanctioned by the Director (Oprn.) DHBVN. The load was to be fed at
66KV level as such the approval of HVPNL Authority was required prior
to sanction of the extended load.
The Director HVPNL approved the release of extension of load from 10000
KVA to 20000 KVA temporarily from existing Mahrauli Road S/s. and
finally from 66 KV sub-station at Sector 38, Gurgaon.
Rico complied with all the terms and conditions of the Demand Notice
and thereafter the extension of load was released temporarily from 66
KV Mahrauli Road S/s as a time gap arrangement till completion of Bay
at 66 KV substation sector-38, Gurgaon.
The extension of load was shifted to 66 KV sub-station Sector-38,
Gurgaon in the month of November, 2008 as a permanent feeding
arrangement. As per the mandatory requirement of the distribution
companies a Tripartite Agreement on this account was executed in
between DHBVN, HVPNL and Rico on 03.08.2009 for extension of load from
9000 KW to 18000 KW with contract demand from 10000 KVA to 20000 KVA.
In view of above it is very well clear that our Contract Demand from
10000 KVA to 20000 KVA has been considered, sanctioned and approved by
DHBVN and HVPNL. Also we have been continuously billed per month right
from 2006 to May, 2011 for our contract demand as 20000 KVA in each and
every monthly electricity bill.
Aggrieved by the demand of DHBVN we filed a civil suit for declaration
with consequential relief of permanent injunction in the Court of Civil
Judge, Gurgaon on 14.10.2011. The court pronounced its judgment with
the direction to DHBVN. That "To decide the
reply/representation/objection of the plaintiff on merit after
affording a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the plaintiff before
recovering the proposed amount Rs.5.60 Crores as per law."
The DHBVN passed final order without personal hearing in violation of
civil court and has directed to deposit the entire amount Rs.5.60
Crores with in 7days.
Aggrieved by unjustified demand notice we filed a petition before HERC
on 07.12.2011. The commission heard the case on 12.01.12 & 06.03.12 and
directed us to exhaust CGRF and Ombudsman before coming to them.
Thereafter we filed a complaint in the CGRF at Hisar on 12.03.2012 the
forum heard the complaint on 28.03.12 and passed his order that this
forum has no jurisdiction to entertain the present complaint.
Thereafter we filed a petition before the Ombudsman at Panchkula on
08.05.2012 against the erroneous order passed by CGRF Hisar, where this
case to be heard on 06.06.2012.
II) Guarantees:
i) Banks have given guarantees on behalf of the Company for Rs.3.63
Crores (Previous year Rs.4.01 Crores).
ii) Letters of Credit outstanding in favour of suppliers for Rs.5.82
Crores (Previous year Rs.34.22 Crores).
iii) The Company has given corporate guarantees to the banks of two of
its subsidiaries (a) Rasa Autocom Limited (wholly owned) for Rs.43.00
Crores (Previous Year Rs.Nil), (b) Rico Jinfei Wheels Limited (92.5%
owned) for Rs.10.00 Crores during the year (Previous Year Rs.Nil).
iv) Surety Bonds executed in favour of The President of India, under
Export Promotion Capital Goods Scheme (EPCG) for importing capital
goods at concessional rate of custom duty, amounting to Rs.120.83
Crores (Previous year Rs.120.83 Crores).
III) Commitments:
Estimated amount of contracts remaining to be executed on capital
account and not provided for (net of advances) Rs.11.69 Crores
(Previous year Rs.14.90 Crores).
Note 3 - Current Assets, Loans & Advances:
In the opinion of the Board of Directors, the Current Assets, Loans and
Advances are having the value at which they are stated in the Balance
Sheet, if realized in the ordinary course of business save as otherwise
stated in this Balance Sheet elsewhere.
Note 4 - The Company has sold the entire 475680 fully paid-up equity
shares of Rs.100/- each of its Joint Venture and Subsidiary Company
namely KRP Auto Industries Limited to other Joint Venture Partner
namely Kailash Royal Premium Projects Private Limited. The entire
consideration of Rs. 20.30 Crores including the amount of premium
towards our investment has been received and consequently, said Joint
Venture & Subsidiary ceased on 12th December, 2011. The transaction
does not involve any profit/loss and also there is no impact on
business operation of the Company.
Note 5 - The Company has sold the entire 5,50,00,000 fully paid-up
equity shares of Rs.10/- each of its Joint Venture Company namely
Continental Rico Hydraulic Brakes India Private Limited to the other
Joint Venture Partner Group Company namely Continental Automotive
Holding Netherlands BV. The entire consideration of Rs.48,61,06,000/-
towards our investment has been received and consequently, said Joint
Venture ceased on 9th March, 2012.
Note 6 - The amount has been given in Crore Rupees unless otherwise
stated.
Note 7 - Previous Year Figures:
For the year ended 31st March, 2011, the Company has prepared and
presented its financial statements as per applicable pre revised
Schedule VI of the Companies Act, 1956. For the year ended 31st March,
2012, the revised Schedule VI notified under the Companies Act, 1956
has become applicable to the Company. The Company has reclassified
previous year figures to confirm to this year's classification. The
adoption of revised Schedule VI does not impact recognition and
measurement principles followed for preparation of financial
statements. However, it significantly impacts presentation and
disclosures made in the financial statements, particularly the
presentation of balance sheet.
Mar 31, 2011
1. Lease hold land includes Rs.16.91 Crores (Gross) of lands situated
at Bhiwadi (Rajasthan), Oragadam (Chennai) & Singur (West Bengal)
(Previous year Rs.25.88 Crores).
2. In the opinion of the Board of Directors, the Current Assets, Loans
and Advances are having the value at which they are stated in the
Balance Sheet, if realized in the ordinary course of business save as
otherwise stated in this Balance Sheet elsewhere.
3. During the year Commercial Production was started on 21st January,
2011 at Sanand (Gujarat).
4. The Company after obtaining the approval of Karnataka Industrial
Areas Development Board (KIADB) has transferred on 30th October, 2010
lease hold rights of plot of land measuring 80,937 Sq. Mtrs. situated
at Plot No. 283, Bommasandra - Jigani Link Road Industrial Area,
Bangalore, to the Joint Venture & Subsidiary Company KRP Auto
Industries Limited for a consideration of Rs.20.25 Crores received by
way of Equity Shares of the said Company.
5. The Other Income includes amounts of Rs.10.61 Crores and Rs.9.29
Crores being the Profits on transfer of leasehold rights/interests of
the Company in the immovable properties at Ambernath (Mumbai) and
Bommasandra (Bangalore) respectively.
6. As a temporary support to its Wholly Owned Subsidiary Rasa Autocom
Limited, the Company has allowed to utilize its letters of credit
limits with Yes Bank Limited to the extent of Rs.5.00 Crores out of
which actual utilization was Rs.3.84 Crores. Yes Bank Limited has
already given an In-principle Letter sanctioning funded and non-funded
limits to Rasa Autocom Limited independently and this arrangement is
till its final sanction and disbursement only.
7. RELATED PARTY DISCLOSURES
Related Party Disclosures as required under Accounting Standard
(AS-18), issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.
B. Key Management Personnel
Details of Key Managerial Personnel are as under:
i) Shri Arvind Kapur - Vice Chairman, CEO & Managing Director
ii) Shri Arun Kapur - Joint Managing Director
8. CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
i) Estimated amount of contracts remaining to be executed on capital
account and not provided for (net of advances) Rs.14.90 Crores
(Previous year Rs.17.38 Crores).
ii) Banks have given guarantees on behalf of the Company worth of
Rs.4.01 Crores (Previous year Rs.2.49 Crores).
iii) Letters of Credit outstanding in favour of suppliers for Rs.34.22
Crores (Previous year Rs.30.88 Crores).
iv) The Company has given counter guarantees to the extent of Rs.13.04
Crores, Rs.7.20 Crores, Rs.6.72 Crores, Rs.5.81 Crores and Rs.4.31
Crores respectively to Axis Bank Limited, State Bank of Patiala,
Standard Chartered Bank, DBS Bank Limited & Yes Bank Limited for the
payment of Buyers' Credits arranged through them from Foreign Banks.
v) Disputed statutory demands in appeals before relevant Hon'ble
Appellate Authorities:
a) Sales Tax Rs.6.54 Crores (Previous Year Rs.7.95 Crores).
b) Central Excise & Service Tax Rs.5.79 Crores (Previous year Rs.4.35
Crores).
c) Local Area Development Tax (LADT) Rs.0.01Crore (Previous year
Rs.0.01 Crore).
d) Income Tax Rs.11.15 Crores (Previous year Rs.1.78 Crores).
Based on favourable judgements in similar cases, legal opinion taken by
the Company, discussions with the solicitors etc. the Company believe
that there is fair chance of decisions in our favour in respect of the
items listed at (v) (a) (b) (c) and (d) above. Hence no provision has
been considered necessary against the same.
vi) Surety Bonds executed in favour of The President of India, under
Export Promotion Capital Goods Scheme (EPCG) for importing Capital
goods at concessional rate of custom duty, amounting to Rs.120.83
Crores (Previous year Rs.122.19 Crores).
9. During the year 64,30,000 Warrants out of the 97,00,000 Warrants
allotted to the Promoter Group Company namely M/s. Kapsons Associates
Investments Private Limited have been converted by way of second &
final tranche into 64,30,000 Equity Shares of Re.1/- each at a premium
of Rs.16.50 per share (already received Rs.4.40 per warrant alongwith
application) and the balance amount of Rs.13.10 per equity share
aggregating to Rs.8,42,33,000/- collected from the allottee against the
allotment of 64,30,000 equity shares, has been utilized for the purpose
it has been raised. The Paid-up Share Capital has increased to
Rs.13,52,85,000/- after this allotment during the year.
ii) The amount of interest accrued & remaining unpaid at the end of the
financial year 2010-2011 is Nil (Previous year Nil).
iii) There is no any interest remaining due & payable for any of the
earlier years.
10. The amount has been given in Crore Rupees unless otherwise stated.
11. Previous year figures have been re-grouped or re-arranged wherever
found necessary.
12. Schedules 1 to 15 form an integral part of the Balance Sheet and
Profit & Loss Account.
Mar 31, 2010
1. Building includes cost of leasehold land & building at Ambernath
(Mumbai) Maharashtra amounting to Rs.0.44 Crore (Previous year Rs.0.44
Crore).
2. Lease hold land includes Rs.25.88 Crores (Gross) of land situated
at Oragadam (Chennai), Bommasandra (Bangalore), Singur (West Bengal)
and Bhiwadi (Rajasthan) (Previous year Rs.15.30 Crores). Title of lease
hold land at Bhiwadi is yet to be registered in the name of Company.
3. The Company had acquired the Land in Singur (West Bengal) for
setting up the plant to cater the demand of components for Tata Nano
Car Project. The Company has invested some amount of money on this
project. But due to some abnormal circumstances beyond the control of
the Company the work of the project has been stopped.
4. In the opinion of the Board of Directors, the Current Assets, Loans
and Advances are having the value at which they are stated in the
Balance Sheet, if realized in the ordinary course of business save as
otherwise stated in this Balance Sheet elsewhere.
5. During the year Commercial Production was started on 22nd March,
2010 at Haridwar.
6. During the year, Company has incorporated a Company under the name
"KRP Auto Industries Limited" jointly with M/s. Kailash Royal Premium
Projects Private Limited, for manufacturing of Auto Components at the
CompanyÃs Industrial Plot at Bangalore. The Company has invested
Rs.0.05 Crore in the Subsidiary Company constituting 95% of its paid-up
capital.
7. Disclosure under Accounting Standard (AS)19 on leased assets and
lease rent.
i) Minimum lease rent payments of Rs.1.93 Crores (Previous year Rs.5.40
Crores) has been recognized in the statement of Profit & Loss Account
for the year ended 31st March, 2010.
ii) Total amount of future minimum lease rent payments under
non-cancellable operating lease periods:
a) Not later than one year Rs. Nil (Previous year Rs.1.84 Crores).
b) Later than one year but not later than five year Rs.Nil (Previous
year Rs.0.03 Crore).
c) Lease tenure 42 to 72 months.
B. Key Management Personnel
Details of Key Managerial Personnel are as under:
i) Shri Arvind Kapur à Vice Chairman, CEO & Managing Director
ii) Shri Arun Kapur à Joint Managing Director
8. CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
i) Estimated amount of contracts remaining to be executed on capital
account and not provided for (net of advances) Rs.17.38 Crores
(Previous year Rs.30.59 Crores).
ii) Banks have given guarantees on behalf of the Company worth of
Rs.2.49 Crores (Previous year Rs.1.98 Crores).
iii) Letters of Credit outstanding in favour of suppliers for Rs.30.88
Crores (Previous year Rs.4.15 Crores).
iv) The Company has given counter guarantees to the extent of Rs.22.03
Crores, Rs.16.43 Crores, Rs.5.72 Crores and Rs.1.33 Crores respectively
to Axis Bank Limited, State Bank of Patiala, Standard Chartered Bank
and DBS Bank Limited for the payment of Buyersà Credits arranged
through them from Foreign Banks.
v) The Company has executed General Surety Bonds for Rs.1.00 Crore
(Previous year Rs.1.00 Crore) in favour of The President of India,
under Central Excise Act, 1944.
vi) Disputed statutory demands in appeals before relevant HonÃble
Appellate Authorities:
a) Sales Tax Rs.7.95 Crores (Previous year Rs.6.34 Crores).
b) Central Excise & Service Tax Rs.4.35 Crores (Previous year Rs.3.79
Crores).
c) Local Area Development Tax (LADT) Rs.0.01 Crore (Previous year
Rs.0.01 Crore).
d) Income Tax Rs.1.78 Crores (Previous year Rs.0.91 Crore).
vii) Surety Bonds executed in favour of The President of India, under
Export Promotion Capital Goods Scheme (EPCG) for importing Capital
goods at concessional rate of custom duty, amounting to Rs.122.19
Crores (Previous year Rs.122.19 Crores).
Based on favourable judgements in similar cases, legal opinion taken by
the Company, discussions with the solicitors etc. the Company believe
that there is fair chance of decisions in our favour in respect of the
items listed at (vi) (a) (b) (c) and (d) above. Hence no provision has
been considered necessary against the same.
9. During the year:
i) the Company has allotted 97,00,000 Warrants convertible into
equivalent number of Equity Shares of Re.1/- each at a premium of
Rs.16.50 per share on preferential basis to the Promoter Group Company
in accordance with SEBI Guidelines. The Warrant holder has the option
of subscribing for 1 equity share of the Company of Re.1/- per warrant
at a premium of Rs.16.50 per equity share to be exercised within a
period of 18 months from the date of allotment i.e. 11th July, 2009. In
case, the options are not exercised, the amount paid of Rs.4.40 per
Warrant is liable to be forfeited. The Company has received an amount
of Rs.4.40 per warrant being not less than 25 per cent of the offer
price, aggregating to Rs.4.26 crores from the Warrant holder against
allotment of warrants. The amount collected against warrants shall be
adjusted against the price payable subsequently for subscribing the
share by exercising the option. The money received towards allotment of
said warrants has been used for the working capital requirement of the
Company.
ii) 32,70,000 Warrants out of the 97,00,000 Warrants allotted to the
Promoter Group Company namely M/s. Kapsons Associates Investments
Private Limited have been converted by way of first tranche into
32,70,000 equity shares of Re.1/- each at a premium of Rs.16.50 per
share (already received Rs.4.40 per warrant alongwith application) and
the balance amount of Rs.13.10 per equity share aggregating to
Rs.4,28,37,000/- collected from the allottee against the allotment of
32,70,000 equity shares, will be utilized for the purpose it has been
raised. The Paid-up Share Capital has increased to Rs.12,88,55,000/-
after this allotment.
10. Consequent to the labour unrest in the Company during the period
from 21st September, 2009 to 5th November, 2009 production was
disrupted, resulting in production loss of around Rs.42.00 Crores both
for domestic and overseas customers.
ii) The amount of interest accrued & remaining unpaid at the end of the
financial year 2009-2010 is Nil. iii) There is no any interest
remaining due & payable for any of the earlier years.
11. The amount has been given in Crore Rupees unless otherwise stated.
12. Previous year figures have been re-grouped or re-arranged wherever
found necessary.
13. Schedules 1 to 14 form an integral part of the Balance Sheet and
Profit & Loss Account.
NOTE : 1. Sales includes interunit/intraunit Rs.22.72 Crores (Previous
year Rs.25.74 Crores). 2. Closing Stock includes Ware House Stock
52474 Nos.
NOTE : Consumption includes interunit/intraunit Rs.20.76 Crores
(Previous year Rs.22.00 Crores).
It is not feasible to furnish quantitative information of other
materials, components and stores & spares parts consumed in view of
considerable number of items diverse in size and volume.
Notes :
1. The above statement has been prepared under indirect method except
in case of dividend which has been considered on the basis of actual
movement of cash, with corresponding adjustments in assets and
liabilities.
2. Cash and cash equivalents represent cash and bank balances only.
3. Additions to fixed assets are stated inclusive of movements of
Capital work-in-progress between beginning and end of the year and
treated as part of investing activities.
4. Previous year figures have been re-grouped/recast, wherever
necessary.